Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2007-03-22

[Jesse Keating]

On Friday 23 March 2007 09:05:33 Tomas Janousek wrote:
> And what difference does it make? I don't think your statement about the
> position of the dist tag is true. Since 4.1 and 4.fc6 are compared the same
> as 4.1 and 4, it's ok. It's common practice to add minor release numbers
> for spec changes etc. as long as one is sure it won't break the order of
> versions.

Yes, but when the same version is shipped on multiple branches, you have to 
add your minor version bump after the dist-tag, not before it.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070323/21a9cf00/attachment.sig>