Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2007-03-22

[Axel Thimm]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:40:51PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:22:15 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:34:02 -0400 (EDT), buildsys wrote:
> > > 
> > > > limb AT jcomserv.net:
> > > >     ettercap
> > > >       FE5 > FE6 (0:0.7.3-13.3.fc5 > 0:0.7.3-12.fc6)
> > > >       FE5 > FE7 (0:0.7.3-13.3.fc5 > 0:0.7.3-12.fc7)
> > > >     
> > > >     gnubg
> > > >       FE5 > FE7 (0:20061119-8.fc5.2 > 0:20061119-7.fc7)
> > > >       FE6 > FE7 (0:20061119-8.fc6 > 0:20061119-7.fc7)
> > > >     
> > > >     xmoto-edit
> > > >       FE5 > FE6 (0:0.2.4-6.1.fc5 > 0:0.2.4-6.fc6)
> > > >       FE5 > FE7 (0:0.2.4-6.1.fc5 > 0:0.2.4-6.fc7)
> > > >     
> > > > miker5slow AT grandecom.net:
> > > >     etherape
> > > >       FE5 > FE6 (0:0.9.7-4.1.fc5 > 0:0.9.7-4.fc6)
> > > >       FE5 > FE7 (0:0.9.7-4.1.fc5 > 0:0.9.7-4.fc7)
> > > 
> > > The issues with "ettercap", "xmoto-edit" and "etherape" are one of the
> > > infamous problems when adding a %dist tag.
> > 
> > Ehem. All of the above have the same inequality relation if you drop
> > the disttag ...
> 
> Impossible, because then you cannot tag and build the packages in the way
> they have been built above. Only due to the added %disttag, it was
> possible to keep the rest of %release equal across multiple branches.

You're setting 13.3 and 12 as well as 4.1 and 4 to be equal. OK, that
must count as cheating at the very least. ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070323/6d2ae8c8/attachment.sig>