fonts packages review and conffile-without-noreplace-flag warning

[Callum Lerwick]

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 08:00 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 27 mars 2007 à 22:26 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> 
> > If the font is removed, then the config file has to be updated.  But the
> > thing is that the user intiates all of these actions.
> 
> Bzzt
> - when you bundle lots of different fonts in a single package the user
> can't control fonts at the rpm level, since the bundle will always exist
> but with different contents (that's a big problem with fonts-region
> packages)

Bundling multiple, not directly related items together in a single RPM
is just plain wrong in any case. Each font should be split into its own
package, and the "fonts-japanese" package can be a meta-package that
depends on them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070328/3d5484d8/attachment.sig>