PPC64 builds (was Re: Merge Status - Building available)

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Fri May 4 20:36:31 UTC 2007


On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 12:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Well, anything that requires mono can probably piggyback on 238950,
> as opposed to having its own separate one.

That makes sense, as long as we can find the packages when we want to
turn them on again (hell, I did firefox/ppc64 and that was as pointless
as mono is). Having separate bugs which _depend_ on 238950 might be
better.

-- 
dwmw2




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list