[Guidelines Change] Conflicts
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Mon May 7 15:14:51 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 17:06 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Just wondering (and *not* meant as a critique!): Wasn't the "unwritten
> rule" that the Packaging Committee handles theoretical packaging while
> FESCo handles practical packaging? Or did I get something wrong?
>
> *If* the Packaging Committee handles practical packaging like "Approve
> Conflicts" I'd suggest we should consider moving "Request for packages
> with static libs" and maybe "Appoval requests for kmod packages" from
> FESCo's duty's over to the Packaging Committee.
Not quite sure. Does FESCo want to handle "practical packaging" or push
it to the FPC?
~spot
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list