ppc64 packages that did not build for dist-fc7

Denis Leroy denis at poolshark.org
Wed May 30 11:45:46 UTC 2007


Bill Nottingham wrote:
> As part of the merge, we bootstrapped and imported Extras for ppc64.
> 
> Not all packages built correctly. Logs of the failures are available at:
> 	http://people.redhat.com/notting/ppc64-rebuild/
> 
> Bugs have only been filed for some of these at this point. Common
> failure cases are:
> 
> - build deps: no ocaml support on ppc64 (being worked on)
> - build deps: no mono support on ppc64 (needs excludearch)
> - inability to build shared libraries. This is due to ancient libtool
>   stuff in the package; a patch can be found at:
>      http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154193
> 
> The list of packages:
> 
[...]
> brasero-0.5.2-1.fc7

"No Package Found for libbeagle-devel >= 0.1.1"

It looks as though beagle is not built for ppc64, from the beagle SPEC file:

# Mono only available on these:
ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha


I'll remove beagle support from brasero for ppc64.




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list