ppc64 packages that did not build for dist-fc7
Denis Leroy
denis at poolshark.org
Wed May 30 11:45:46 UTC 2007
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> As part of the merge, we bootstrapped and imported Extras for ppc64.
>
> Not all packages built correctly. Logs of the failures are available at:
> http://people.redhat.com/notting/ppc64-rebuild/
>
> Bugs have only been filed for some of these at this point. Common
> failure cases are:
>
> - build deps: no ocaml support on ppc64 (being worked on)
> - build deps: no mono support on ppc64 (needs excludearch)
> - inability to build shared libraries. This is due to ancient libtool
> stuff in the package; a patch can be found at:
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154193
>
> The list of packages:
>
[...]
> brasero-0.5.2-1.fc7
"No Package Found for libbeagle-devel >= 0.1.1"
It looks as though beagle is not built for ppc64, from the beagle SPEC file:
# Mono only available on these:
ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha
I'll remove beagle support from brasero for ppc64.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list