[Guidelines Change] Conflicts

Josh Boyer jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Mon May 7 15:13:18 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 10:14 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 17:06 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> > Just wondering (and *not* meant as a critique!): Wasn't the "unwritten
> > rule" that the Packaging Committee handles theoretical packaging while
> > FESCo handles practical packaging? Or did I get something wrong?
> > 
> > *If* the Packaging Committee handles practical packaging like "Approve
> > Conflicts" I'd suggest we should consider moving "Request for packages
> > with static libs" and maybe "Appoval requests for kmod packages" from
> > FESCo's duty's over to the Packaging Committee.
> 
> Not quite sure. Does FESCo want to handle "practical packaging" or push
> it to the FPC?

Personally, I'd rather leave it to FESCo.  Especially for kmods and
static libs.  Though I will guarantee you that for things like
Conflicts, etc the Packaging Committee's opinion will be very welcome ;)

josh




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list