An alternate proposal to answer the guidelines question.

[Chris Weyl]

On 5/17/07, Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> 5) if a maintainer still doesn't fix a package, the arbitrator lets
> FESCO know that we need to start the orphan package process.

I like this, but think that step 5 should be something like "final
enforcement rests with FESCo"...  Give them a little more flexibility
than just forcibly orphaning a package.

                                -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia