keeping spare-time-contributors happy

[Julian Sikorski]

Rahul Sundaram pisze:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> And why not ? They worked well enough before, didn't they?
>>
>> Don't get me wrong I'm in favor of updates announcements and of
>> avoiding unneeded updates.
> 
> If you already in favor of these, I don't think you need any convincing
> that these are important for the end users. Sure, they aren't absolutely
> necessary but these are an improvement over what we had previously and
> there is some additional overhead as part of that.
> 
> If anyone in favor of the processes then implementation details can be
> improved. If anyone thinks that the processes themselves are not useful
> then any implementation won't make them happy. Don't mix these.
> 
> Rahul
The other problem is that pup does not display the info maintainers put
into bodhi yet.