keeping spare-time-contributors happy

[Hans de Goede]

Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram pisze:
>> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> And why not ? They worked well enough before, didn't they?
>>>
>>> Don't get me wrong I'm in favor of updates announcements and of
>>> avoiding unneeded updates.
>> If you already in favor of these, I don't think you need any convincing
>> that these are important for the end users. Sure, they aren't absolutely
>> necessary but these are an improvement over what we had previously and
>> there is some additional overhead as part of that.
>>
>> If anyone in favor of the processes then implementation details can be
>> improved. If anyone thinks that the processes themselves are not useful
>> then any implementation won't make them happy. Don't mix these.
>>
>> Rahul
> The other problem is that pup does not display the info maintainers put
> into bodhi yet.
> 

So you mean that we are doing this whole dance for like .. nothing?
Ah great planning guys.

Regards,

Hans