Wording of Legal Issues myth
Toshio Kuratomi
toshio at tiki-lounge.com
Mon Aug 22 04:36:24 UTC 2005
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 12:46 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 8/21/05, Toshio Kuratomi <toshio at tiki-lounge.com> wrote:
> > The ForbiddenItems page is much more explicit:
> > Of course, the logical followup is: But I want to get foo and do bar,
> > how can I do one of the items listed above?
> >
> > The unofficial [WWW]http://fedorafaq.org provides useful answers on
> > commonly asked questions.
>
> You can reference fedorafaq.org and call it a place to find answers
> for common questions.. but you can not explictly state which questions
> it answers. Thats the line.
>
If this wording passed legal, I'm not going to try to find fault with
it :-)
> How about instead of trying to re-interpret or expand on what the
> forbiddenitems text as written, we either site the link or quote it
> verbatim and leave it at that. Any expansion beyond the exact text as
> written in the forbiddenitem page is going to need legal review. If
> the text of the forbiddenitems page has room for improvement we should
> inmprove the text on that page and use it as the cananoical
> explanation in all other communication mediums.
>
That would be excellent. I would agree with either of those approaches.
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20050821/b754a07c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list