Fedora review

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 00:21 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: 
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:16:14AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems
> > > But obviously they weren't answered for the review author.  So there is a 
> > > problem in our getting the message out.  What good is the wiki if its not 
> > > helping our users?
> > Hmmm -- the default firefox bookmarks in uptates/testing/3 seem to still be
> > "Red Hat, Inc.", "Red Hat Network", "Red Hat Linux Documentation", etc.
> > Maybe the Fedora Wiki could be there instead?
> 
> PS: serious suggestion, not just being a smartass because you're the
> maintainer of that package. :)

It's a good suggestion. 

AFAIK, we are now clear to link to fedorafaq.org and other sites that
themselves link to information that is non-free or possibly infringing
on patents.  We cannot link directly to such possibly-infringing sites.

For these bookmarks, here are a few I'd add.  Matt, do you want to file
the RFE? :)

fedorafaq.org
fedorausers.org
fedoralinks.org
fedora.redhat.com/docs
fedoraproject.org/wiki
fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems

-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20050719/519872b2/attachment.sig>