Meetings
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Sun Oct 23 09:39:47 UTC 2005
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:26 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote:
> Any other opinions or ideas?
We could have timezone-based working groups.
With the alternating days, there are going to be people who never make
one or the other of the alternating meetings. There will be some who
make all the meetings, regardless of the time.
Rather than having most of the group always be one week out of the loop,
we could divide the group by timezones, and group task assignments by
those individuals.
The floaters, who go to both meetings, can carry useful threads across
the two meetings.
I've no idea if this is a good idea, I'm just putting it out there as it
occurred to me. :)
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20051023/d06d5d9e/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list