The ongoing Fedora Forum discussion

[Marc Wiriadisastra]

+1 

I agree if people had been following the issues well they we would know
the hat issue has been gone over a few times and that its been decided
that its not to be used.

Marc
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 15:22 -0400, Jeremy Hogan wrote:
> On 9/21/05, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>         We wanted enough input to validate the direction the logo
>         should take.
>         The mechanism we used to gather that input was the Fedora
>         marketing list. 
>         Why?  Because this is *precisely* why the Fedora marketing
>         group exists.
>         And yes, that *necessarily* excludes 99% of the Fedora
>         community -- but it
>         *includes* the 1% who care enough about the direction of
>         Fedora's brand to 
>         get *directly* involved.
> 
> +1 
> 
> And not only that, but this particular issue is not up for broad
> debate, or a referendum, since RH marketing and legal have to make the
> final call. So inviting a mass of folks to contribute, only to find
> out that they didn't get their way, or that their input could be
> considered would have made them even madder.
> 
> Besides, we don't need the other 99% of the community telling us it
> should be a blue hat. ;-)
> 
> --jeremy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list