development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5 Test2 (LWN): Some comments)

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at
Mon Jan 30 11:20:21 UTC 2006

Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >>>>Developers have been 
> >>>>communicating that this release cycle was only for FC5 for quite a while 
> >>>>now.
> >>>Yeah, and it seems that was not enough.
> >>Depends on where you get the information from. For example, distrowatch 
> >>corrected its previous misconception recently. 
> >>
> >That's not "official" -
> >
> What do you consider official?.

Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed mail to
one of the mailinglists from a official person. A press-release.

But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or

>  How do we communicate all the official 
> information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions?

At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
community if they are floating around like this one.

How? Red Hat magazine? Wiki probably is not the best
place because I suspect some people don't trust the informations there.
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at>

More information about the Fedora-marketing-list mailing list