development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5 Test2 (LWN): Some comments)

[Rahul Sundaram]

Hi

>>>      
>>>
>>What do you consider official?.
>>    
>>
>
>Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed mail to
>one of the mailinglists from a official person. A press-release.
>
>But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or
>wikipedia-writers. 
>
>  
>
I am not sure whether journalists or wikipedia writers are picking up 
the notion of a permanent change release schedule. It has always been 
the case so far the the release schedule will change based on the 
release developments that is roughly not but not rigidly time based.

>> How do we communicate all the official 
>>information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions?
>>    
>>
>
>At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
>community if they are floating around like this one.
>
>How? Red Hat magazine? 
>
I dont think writing a article exclusively about release changes in Red 
Hat Magazine is worthy.

>fedora.redhat.com?
>
The schedule page already shows the current release schedule. The next 
schedule is undecided at this point

> Wiki probably is not the best
>place because I suspect some people don't trust the informations there.
>  
>
I am open to specific ideas.

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers