development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5 Test2 (LWN): Some comments)
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Mon Jan 30 18:14:53 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:25 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> While we are at the topic already: This fact was badly communicated.
> There seems to be a whole lot of confusion about the current Fedora
> release cycle in the community -- for example the german
> wikipedia-writers have a long discussion about it and nowhere can find a
> *official* statement [*1] that the nine month cycle for FC5 was only a
> exception:
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Fedora_Core#6_Monate
I'm confused. Wasn't our original and still official release schedule
every 6-9 months? Hasn't every release thus far fallen in that time
frame? Won't FC5 fall in that time frame (albeit on the far side)?
Where is the confusion coming from?
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20060130/25bcc537/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list