development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5 Test2 (LWN): Some comments)
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Tue Jan 31 06:56:38 UTC 2006
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:58 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>
>
>>>>How do we communicate all the official
>>>>information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
>>>community if they are floating around like this one.
>>>How? Red Hat magazine?
>>>
>>>
>>I dont think writing a article exclusively about release changes in Red
>>Hat Magazine is worthy.
>>
>>
>
>Sure, but we have a Fedora Status page there -- one sentence there and
>the whole situation is clarified.
>
>
Feel free to write a note to fedoranews.org weekly. Fedora status
report is just a edited version of that
>
>
>>>fedora.redhat.com?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>The schedule page already shows the current release schedule. The next
>>schedule is undecided at this point
>>
>>
>
>And that's part of the problem IMHO.
>
You havent explained why.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list