"Official" communications

[Greg DeKoenigsberg]

We're having a FF board meeting tomorrow.  This topic -- "official 
communications" -- will come up.  Will keep you posted.

--g

---------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Foundation || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
---------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > >Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> > >>>>Developers have been 
> > >>>>communicating that this release cycle was only for FC5 for quite a while 
> > >>>>now.
> > >>>Yeah, and it seems that was not enough.
> > >>Depends on where you get the information from. For example, distrowatch 
> > >>corrected its previous misconception recently. 
> > >>http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060123#1
> > >That's not "official" -
> > >
> > What do you consider official?.
> 
> Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed mail to
> one of the mailinglists from a official person. A press-release.
> 
> But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or
> wikipedia-writers. 
> 
> >  How do we communicate all the official 
> > information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions?
> 
> At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
> community if they are floating around like this one.
> 
> How? Red Hat magazine? fedora.redhat.com? Wiki probably is not the best
> place because I suspect some people don't trust the informations there.
> -- 
> Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>
> 
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>