a call to action [Fwd: LWN headline: Blame Fedora = High Praise]

[Karsten Wade]

In the article referenced below there is an (implied) call to action for
Fedora:

"One might well wonder why certain Fedora users feel the need to repeat
these complaints so often. Perhaps the project is not doing an adequate
job of communicating what it is trying to do. One assumes that, if
people understood what Fedora is, they would not complain about it not
being something it can never be."

Is this true?

What are we doing to get this message out?

What can we do better?

Etc.

I can blog all I want, but if it's only the choir who is reading, then
what?

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Matt Domsch <matt at domsch.com>

    Check out LWN.net for today's weekly edition.  Subscribers (and I do 
encourage folks to subscribe) will find it interesting.  Non-subscribers 
should look at this:
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/230042/5181766fe793aa6b/


-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20070411/6f8a7c54/attachment.sig>