a call to action [Fwd: LWN headline: Blame Fedora = High Praise]
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Thu Apr 19 02:30:44 UTC 2007
Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I did suggest something very similar at
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-March/msg00139.html
>> Apparently there isn't much traction to this idea.
>
> I read through the thread and I didn't get that idea at all.
> In fact, the idea I got was more confusion than anything.
> I.e., people are reading the problem in different ways.
At any rate, we need people to implement it.
> 1) You cross-reference the PCI/USB/etc... Vendor ID to a name, possibly
> also spit out the product name. That informs the user.
>
> 2) If the Device ID is a known, binary-only issue that Fedora cannot
> redistribute, inform the user that these drivers do not come with
> Fedora, and a Bugzilla entry should _not_ be filed for support.
>
> In fact, #2 would _also_ have the added bonus of addressing the endless
> number of bug reports being filed -- something one person explicitly
> complained about in that thread.
Then there are two other related projects which might interest you.
https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/LHCP/
https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/smolt/wiki
Rahul
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list