Fedora's mid-life crisis -- YUM v. APT v. SmartPM

Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org
Sun Aug 5 23:42:23 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 02:40 +0600, Imtiaz Rahi wrote:
> Only painful thing to me is YUM. RPM packages are good but YUM, Pirut
> and others are not good enough.
> Synaptic is still better to see what updates are available, then
> choose one and find out what are the dependencies which are going to
> be downloaded and etc. 

Why stop at Apt/Synaptic?

Why not just look at Smart Package Manager (aka SmartPM aka Smart)?
GUIs are standard.  Dependency resolution is outstanding, etc...

Also, last time I checked, Apt had _not_ addressed multi-architecture.
Anything Debian-based is still using chroot for i386 support.

> Why don't we arrange a poll ?

Why don't people contribute and directly change what they don't like?
;)

-- 
Bryan J. Smith         Professional, Technical Annoyance
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org   http://thebs413.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------
        Fission Power:  An Inconvenient Solution





More information about the Fedora-marketing-list mailing list