Fedora more successful, developer-wise, than Ubuntu

[Zhukov Pavel]

On Dec 20, 2007 4:12 PM, Marc Wiriadisastra <marc at mwiriadi.id.au> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:06 +0300, Zhukov Pavel wrote:
> > On Dec 20, 2007 3:20 PM, Marc Wiriadisastra <marc at mwiriadi.id.au> wrote:
> > > Interesting post about whether Fedora is more popular for dev's than
> > > Ubuntu.
> > >
> > > http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/12/18/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu
> > >
> > > I personally don't think it's a fair comparison because Ubuntu is
> > > derived from Debian and there is cross over.  What I would like to see
> > > is a comparison with Debian and Fedora to see what the actual numbers
> > > are.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Marc
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> > > Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
> > >
> > Fedora project managed by RH. It means strict roadmap, defined
> > chekpoints, clear release cycle.
> > Debian on the other hand, fully community driven. no checkpoints, no
> > erelease cycle, no "head": Debian Project Leader have very limited
> > premissions.
> >
>
> I disagree while Fedora project is sponsored by RH the majority of the
> contributors are from the community.  Max blogged about this the other
> day if I remember correctly.
>
> I'm not to sure what the definition of a community project is but I
> would have thought more than 50% constitutes a community project?
>
> My point related mainly to developer-wise which translates to packagers
> and docs I think.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marc
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>

by "Community driven" i mean that roadmap and other major decisions
defined by community using voting or other procedures.