[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Life Cycle



Hi,

IMHO, I really don't think we should do this, most people use Fedora for personal computer.

I am one of the people who like my system to be up-to-date and use the most recent technologies.

You can still use Fedora 6 if you want, I don't think there's any problem with that :)

Oh, BTW, isn't the life cycle now 6 months? Last release (Fedora 7) was in May, and Fedora 8 will be released in November, and that is what most popular distros do.

Cheers!

On 10/23/07, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira <rodrigopadula projetofedora org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi All!!

I'm thinking about the Fedora Life Cycle and i have some conclusions:

- - 13 months is a very short life cycle time and it's a bad thing
thinking in the Fedora Marketing (I am constantly asked about it in my
lectures).
- - with this short time we cannot use Fedora in production servers. In
Brazil we have BIG FEDORA CASES and it's a major concern of Brazilian TI
Managers.
- - many of linux distributions has more than 13 months of life cycle

So,how can we extend that life cycle to increase for at least 2 years by
release?

IMHO, we should do this!!

Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira
http://www.projetofedora.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHRFdPg3HAC1vlg4RAkwEAJ9yCrxDLPzwgAaoyMjMSqMJpHPEVQCgn6U3
84Tlew5BXAEyNvGZWVa7o7w=
=T5JA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list



--
Laith Juwaidah
ljuwaidah gmail com
http://www.ljuwaidah.com
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]