Res: Fedora 9

John Mackay mackay3 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 17:47:35 UTC 2008


-1
Names have allways been relaxed and fun.

2008/1/20, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira <rodrigopadula at projetofedora.org>:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> +1
>
> Juan Camilo Prada escreveu:
> |
> |
> | On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 05:55 -0800, Henrique de Castro wrote:
> |> Here in Brazil (and I bet that in all Latin countries) the choice of
> |> this codenames have caused a negative reaction even in the more
> |> enthusiastic users.
> |
> | I agree, I'm from Colombia and so far many people think those names may
> | get fedora to lost some credibility
> | in front of some other distros. For example that Chupacabra, thats a
> | ridiculous code name (no offense to the one who proposed it)
> |
> |
> | Juan Camilo Prada - <jprada at fedoraproject.org>
> | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JuanCamiloPrada
> |
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHk6NrPg3HAC1vlg4RArE+AKCtkElfuFwDlfNQxgqmhpqJG5DJ3gCgrEO4
> Pzw3ZZXuJP6xydPhAHnkahY=
> =r2Ko
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20080121/cbe41025/attachment.htm>


More information about the Fedora-marketing-list mailing list