[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: SIG meeting



On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 12:08 -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 14:40 -0500, Colby Hoke wrote:
> 
> > Anyway, the point is: we want to help. We want to get organized and are 
> > committed to having the next launch go off with as much organization and 
> > backing as possible. We want this to continue with future launches as well.
> 
> +1
> 
> > So, I propose we have our meeting sometime mid next week - say Wednesday 
> > at 2EST? We can have it on #fedora-mktg if that's fine with everyone.
> 
> Although I used to feel differently, I'm now in favor of using
> #fedora-meeting, despite the scheduling challenges.  It raises the
> visibility of the work and gets discussions in front of many more people
> (lurkers) than having it on a stand-alone channel.
> 
> With that, for Wed. the available time slots[1] are:
> 
> 1600 UTC (1 pm EST)
> 1900 UTC (4 pm EST)  (oops, Colby and I have a conflict then)
> 
> *sigh*  Looks like it's time for #fedora-marketing-too (or something.)

So I'm not the only person who stumbles on the time -- although I
probably do it way more often. :-)  1900 UTC == 1400/2pm EST, 1100/11am
PST.  Does that make it better?

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
           Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]