Associating the Red Hat and Fedora brands?
Jon Stanley
jonstanley at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 21:52:43 UTC 2008
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com> wrote:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/83360/
That's ancient history at this point. History we'd of course rather
not have to look back on, but we do. As of now, I think that Fedora
is the most transparent commercially backed distribution out there.
> This is pretty much the most accurate depiction of how the great brand
> gulf between Fedora and Red Hat started. And in many people's minds, that
> gulf has grown to such an extent that many don't have any way of
> associating Red Hat with Fedora *at all*.
Yep, sad but true.
>
> So let me ask you:
>
> If, in splash screens for Fedora, we put a tasteful "sponsored by Red Hat"
> with the Shadowman logo somewhere small... how would you all feel about
> that?
Go for it! Maybe we can attempt to repair some of the past "damage"
to the brand. I help in correcting lots of people's perceptions that
things are still how they were in the past.
Now the question is: Is rh_legal OK with this? :)
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list