Post FUDCon Survey

[Mel Chua]

>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Mel Chua<mel at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>>> about it... perhaps we go with the temp solution now, and simultaneously
>>>>> schedule a "get limesurvey up" hackfest at some point?

> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Robyn Bergeron<robyn.bergeron at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> If someone is interested in getting the infrastructure up internally
>> while you guys are at FUDCon (btw, my status is I fail, I haven't even
>> filed tickets yet... sorry!) I can get the questions up this weekend
>> on it.
>>
>> Alternately, if that's not possible, I can do the temporary, JUST
>> TEMPORARY, fix of doing it on limeservice.
>>
>> Yaakov, can you send the questions you were interested in asking to
>> the list?  I'll add them to the other list of questions (they will
>> resemble what is in
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Surveys/FUDConF9 ... with
>> obvious changes about dates/places, etc), post the full final question
>> list to the mailing list for general approval, and get them up.
>>
>> Let me know what you guys think.  Sorry I'm not there :)
>>
>> -Robyn

On 12/04/2009 04:36 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
 > And a heads up - Limeservice allows 25 free respondents, after that
 > there is a fee ($10 for 100, $22 for 250, etc.)  I'm assuming we would
 > have more than 25, but if there is more than 100 (or I guess, 125)
 > then let me know, if that is the route we want to go down
 > -temporarily- :)
 >
 > -Robyn

Wrapping up this email thread - I think Ryan was going to get us 
limesurvey up on infra soon, but I'm not sure if this is coming in time 
to use it for the FUDCon survey. Ryan, any thoughts? Should Robyn be 
getting up a temporary fix for just this one survey?

--Mel

PS: There's a high probability that someone will reply and tell me "oh, 
we figured this out in #fedora-mktg days ago, we're all set." ;)