ETA on the CMS? (Was: Podcast feed)

[Susan Lauber]

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jack Aboutboul <jaa at redhat.com> wrote:
> Where is the documentation on whats going on with this, if any?  What did we
> decide to use?

The evaluation period was tracking on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CMS_solution_for_Fedora_Project_websites
(a page that probably needs updates)

The decision was zikula.
Infrastructure has provided a test system but it needs to be redone
with the fedora rpms
The modules need to be packaged.
The list of modules to package is is in this thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2009-May/msg00041.html
At least one is started: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091

There are a number of Docs Project members that want to learn to
package but all need help (probably with more than just packaging)
There may be a packaging class focusing on these modules at the FAD at
SELF (I wish I could go).

-Susan

>
> Jack
>
> David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ian Weller <ian at ianweller.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> CMS coming soon
>>>>
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, what's the ETA on this?
>>>
>>
>> Def. post-F-11
>> I honestly haven't had the time I wish I could dedicate to getting all
>> of the modules packaged.
>> In addition, Toshio pointed out several problems which have required
>> packaging some additional php modules.
>>
>> I'd argue we are 2 months away at our current rate - and I am probably
>> forgetting about some critical path stuff that needs to happen.
>>

-- 
Susan Lauber, (RHCX, RHCA, RHCSS)
Lauber System Solutions, Inc.
http://www.laubersolutions.com
gpg: 15AC F794 A3D9 64D1 D9CE  4C26 EFC3 11C2 BFA1 0974