[Fedora-packaging] Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Mon Mar 3 16:57:40 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> - Clarify where documentation should go. Currently my practice has
> been to put just the license file (if any) in the main package's %doc,
> and the license file plus all other documentation & examples in
> the devel subpackage. This duplicates (only) the license file, but
> that seems acceptable since we shouldn't distribute software without
> its license.
-devel packages should Require the main package, thus, there really
isn't any need for the duplicate license copy.
~spot
More information about the Fedora-ocaml-list
mailing list