UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Fri Mar 14 07:49:51 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 18:14 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml
>
> Diff from the previous version:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml?action=diff&rev2=2&rev1=1
It doesn't address multilib. For example, the -devel packages should
require ocaml of the _same_ architecture, not just "ocaml".
In particular, the example that "ocaml-pcre-devel needs an explicit
'Requires: pcre-devel'" is wrong, because an i386 pcre-devel package
would satisfy that, while not being particularly useful for an x86_64
ocaml-pcre-devel.
Because of bug #235755 you may need to use virtual provides or
file-based dependencies to express the dependencies correctly.
Unless we put 235755 on the F9Blocker... :)
--
dwmw2
More information about the Fedora-ocaml-list
mailing list