Fact-check - Fedora OLPC article.

[Todd Robinson]

Thanks guys.

When I began the article it was intended to be about how good "Live" 
Flash/SD installations work under linux, and the "random list" was 
actually a list of the best performing Live Persistent distributions 
we've had the privileged of putting on Flash Drives. But I was also 
wanting to throw Fedora at the top of the list for the effort with the 
F10/XO...so I basically chunked it in at the beginning and end.

Anyway, I've updated the short article with the sugarlab.org info, 
inserted a missing heading, and re-arranged the "random list" which 
helped clean it up.

Thanks again!


~Todd

Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>   
>> Also, a random list of linux distributions at the end doesn't work very well
>> in a article about Fedora and OLPC. If you want to, you can highlight other
>> Linux distributions with OLPC focus.
>>     
>
> Agreed. And the good list of those is here :-)
> http://sugarlabs.org/go/Supported_systems
>
> cheers,
>
>
>
> m
>