[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Problem while building packages



Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu tomeuvizoso net>wrote:
>>
>>> As Jeremy said, you seem to have either too recent activities or a too
>>> old sugar stack. This commit adapted the Browse activity to the new
>>> API, and broke it with the older:
>>>
>>> So I guess that if F9 cannot update to a newer Sugar, then older
>>> activities should be used.
>>
>> Fedora 9 packages are obsolete and doesn't really work at the moment :(
>>
>> Even if we updated Sugar we would be in troubles with pyxpcom. I'd prefer to
>> keep focusing on Fedora 10 for now, since there is quite a bit of work to do
>> there yet and the freeze is approaching.
> 
> Yeah, I agree to focus on F10. xulrunner is a prominent issue that we 
> likely would not solve.

With Fedora 10 Beta I was able to make some packages.  Thanks for your help.

Fabian.

-- 
Fingerprint: 2F6C 930F D3C4 7E38 6AFA 4EB4 E23C D2DD 36A4 397F

Fedora always leads and never follows.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]