From cjb at laptop.org Tue Dec 1 00:07:48 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:07:48 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 48 In-Reply-To: (Christoph Derndorfer's message of "Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:49:16 +0100") References: <20091130062233.AAE27FA87E@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: Hi, > The advantages in terms of energy use must surely be tiny given > that we're talking about 5sec of reducing consumption by maybe > 0.5W. On the other hand turning off the backlight completely > after a certain amount of time as a first measure to reduce power > consumption strikes me as an interesting alternative to the > current implementation... We'll do both -- dim the backlight and suspend, and set an alarm for a wakeup to turn off the screen altogether a few minutes later. The reason for leaving the backlight dimmed for a few minutes is that it might be possible for you to continue to read the web or book page that you're looking at while it's dimmed and we're saving the big watts. Dimming the screen when idle is extremely common for laptops; OS X and gnome-power-manager do it too, so I don't think it's too much of a distraction. With the new versions of OHM, I do the dimming as a fade rather than an atomic change, so that should help it be less distracting too. (If it still feels distracting, I could make the fade take a little longer? It takes around 150ms right now.) Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From pgf at laptop.org Tue Dec 1 01:00:43 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:00:43 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 48 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20091130_191229_220695_AD9F9361) References: <20091130062233.AAE27FA87E@dev.laptop.org> (sfid-20091130_191229_220695_AD9F9361) Message-ID: <7459.1259629243@foxharp.boston.ma.us> chris wrote: > Hi, > > > The advantages in terms of energy use must surely be tiny given > > that we're talking about 5sec of reducing consumption by maybe > > 0.5W. On the other hand turning off the backlight completely > > after a certain amount of time as a first measure to reduce power > > consumption strikes me as an interesting alternative to the > > current implementation... > > We'll do both -- dim the backlight and suspend, and set an alarm for a > wakeup to turn off the screen altogether a few minutes later. The > reason for leaving the backlight dimmed for a few minutes is that it > might be possible for you to continue to read the web or book page > that you're looking at while it's dimmed and we're saving the big > watts. clearly we'll know more as we all use it more. i currently find the 20 second timeout much too short -- it's far too likely that i'll still be looking at the screen. > > Dimming the screen when idle is extremely common for laptops; OS X > and gnome-power-manager do it too, so I don't think it's too much of > a distraction. With the new versions of OHM, I do the dimming as a > fade rather than an atomic change, so that should help it be less > distracting too. (If it still feels distracting, I could make the > fade take a little longer? It takes around 150ms right now.) i also find the fade-up to be more distracting than the fade-down. and i think it makes the resume appear to take longer than it really does. (i tried the fade-up in powerd, and switched to instant-on pretty quickly.) paul =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From wad at laptop.org Tue Dec 1 09:36:07 2009 From: wad at laptop.org (John Watlington) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:36:07 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 48 In-Reply-To: <7459.1259629243@foxharp.boston.ma.us> References: <20091130062233.AAE27FA87E@dev.laptop.org> (sfid-20091130_191229_220695_AD9F9361) <7459.1259629243@foxharp.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: I would prefer to see the backlight dimming take place on a longer time scale (as Paul says, I'm frequently still reading when it happens) and the suspend happening much more aggressively. Does OHM have user configurable knobs ? Cheers, wad On Nov 30, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Paul Fox wrote: > chris wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> The advantages in terms of energy use must surely be tiny given >>> that we're talking about 5sec of reducing consumption by maybe >>> 0.5W. On the other hand turning off the backlight completely >>> after a certain amount of time as a first measure to reduce power >>> consumption strikes me as an interesting alternative to the >>> current implementation... >> >> We'll do both -- dim the backlight and suspend, and set an alarm >> for a >> wakeup to turn off the screen altogether a few minutes later. The >> reason for leaving the backlight dimmed for a few minutes is that it >> might be possible for you to continue to read the web or book page >> that you're looking at while it's dimmed and we're saving the big >> watts. > > clearly we'll know more as we all use it more. i currently find > the 20 second timeout much too short -- it's far too likely that > i'll still be looking at the screen. > >> >> Dimming the screen when idle is extremely common for laptops; OS X >> and gnome-power-manager do it too, so I don't think it's too much of >> a distraction. With the new versions of OHM, I do the dimming as a >> fade rather than an atomic change, so that should help it be less >> distracting too. (If it still feels distracting, I could make the >> fade take a little longer? It takes around 150ms right now.) > > i also find the fade-up to be more distracting than the > fade-down. and i think it makes the resume appear to take longer > than it really does. (i tried the fade-up in powerd, and > switched to instant-on pretty quickly.) > > paul > =--------------------- > paul fox, pgf at laptop.org > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel at lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel From dsd at laptop.org Tue Dec 1 09:47:47 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:47:47 +0000 Subject: VTE bug breaks Pippy activity Message-ID: <1259660867.2124.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi, There is a bug in the VTE package in Fedora 11 and 12 that breaks the Pippy activity (http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9479) All the hard work has been done, but I can't get the fix into Fedora. The maintainer is unresponsive to bugzilla and email. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537391 What can I do? (making a local build to ship in the OLPC OS is one option, but I'd like to get this fixed properly and I'm prepared to do the work) cheers Daniel From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Tue Dec 1 13:44:48 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:44:48 +0100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 48 In-Reply-To: <20091130062233.AAE27FA87E@dev.laptop.org> References: <20091130062233.AAE27FA87E@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <46a038f90912010544o2543dfd9v534cdd7e99fa9a28@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os48 And as the wiki says - remember to use the latest OFW with it. My XO had a bad case of psychedelic UI with q3a15, cured with q3a16... m. -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From cjb at laptop.org Tue Dec 1 15:25:14 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:25:14 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 48 In-Reply-To: (John Watlington's message of "Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:36:07 -0500") References: <20091130062233.AAE27FA87E@dev.laptop.org> <7459.1259629243@foxharp.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: Hi, > I would prefer to see the backlight dimming take place on a > longer time scale (as Paul says, I'm frequently still reading > when it happens) and the suspend happening much more > aggressively. Not quite sure what this means -- do you mean the dimming itself should take longer, or that it should be happening earlier than it does? > Does OHM have user configurable knobs ? Yeah. The first two numbers in /etc/ohm/plugins.d/timeouts.ini are the timeouts for beginning dimming and hitting suspend. I don't have an option for how long the dim itself takes to happen (but could add one). I've changed the downwards dim from 25ms * 6 to 35ms * 6 for the next build, and removed the dim altogether when coming back up. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From cjb at laptop.org Tue Dec 1 20:23:48 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:23:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 49 Message-ID: <20091201202348.A8E82FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os49 Compressed image size: 462.44mb (+51.16mb since build 48) Description of changes in this build: * OHM dims the backlight lower more gradually, but raises it immediately * Pretty boot now extends until Sugar has come up (#9772) * Add some content bundles (+60MB) * B2s should now stay asleep on power button press (#9762) * "Activities" on library home page links to activities.sl.o (#9767) * Improve olpc-update server selection logic (#9749) * View source key works in Etoys (#9733) * DC sensor mode in Measure might be fixed, needs testing (#9604) * Distance activity should be fixed, need testing (#9552) * We now pull activities from an activity group page (#9506) * Journal listview wasn't updating properly (#9744) * Etoys drawing performance is much improved (#9707) Package changes since build 48: -etoys-4.0.2337-1.noarch +etoys-4.0.2339-1.fc11.noarch -fedora-release-notes-11.0.0-2.fc11.noarch -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091127.1440.1.olpc.0caeb3a.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091130.1840.1.olpc.0940a43.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091127.1440.1.olpc.0caeb3a.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091130.1840.1.olpc.0940a43.i586 -ohm-0.1.1-9.25.20091130git.fc11.i586 +ohm-0.1.1-9.28.20091202git.fc11.i586 -olpc-bootanim-2.10-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-bootanim-2.11-1.fc11.i586 -olpc-library-2.0.2-1.fc11.noarch +olpc-library-2.0.3-1.fc11.noarch -olpc-update-2.20-1.fc11.noarch +olpc-update-2.21-1.fc11.noarch -olpc-utils-1.0.11-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-utils-1.0.12-1.fc11.i586 -sugar-0.84.7-1.fc11.10.i586 +sugar-0.84.7-1.fc11.11.i586 -tree-1.5.2.2-2.fc11.i586 +tree-1.5.3-1.fc11.i586 -xdg-utils-1.0.2-8.20081121cvs.fc11.noarch From cjb at laptop.org Tue Dec 1 21:04:42 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:04:42 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 49 In-Reply-To: <20091201202348.A8E82FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> (Chris Ball's message of "Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:23:48 -0500 (EST)") References: <20091201202348.A8E82FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: Hi, > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os49 If you have a 1.5 B2 (which almost everyone with a 1.5 machine does) and are using os47-os49, you'll need to turn off Automatic Power Management in the Sugar control panel, else the wireless device will go away after the first suspend and not come back until the next reboot. This doesn't happen on B3s, and we can throw a quirk into the kernel to fix it for B2s. We'll announce when there's a new build with a kernel that allows suspend/resume testing on B2s, but in the meantime you should avoid suspending them if you care about wireless. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Dec 1 22:16:32 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:16:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: yum repo problem in f11-xo1/os10 Message-ID: <967360.26615.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Apparently the build used packages from F11-updates-testing (eg glibc-common) however this repo is not included in the yum repos of the build From smparrish at gmail.com Tue Dec 1 22:30:10 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:30:10 -0500 Subject: yum repo problem in f11-xo1/os10 In-Reply-To: <967360.26615.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <967360.26615.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 17:16:32 Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Apparently the build used packages from F11-updates-testing (eg > glibc-common) however this repo is not included in the yum repos of the > build > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > updates-testing was supposed to be enabled. I'll check into it. Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #sugar, #fedora-devel, #packagekit From sebastian at when.com Tue Dec 1 22:53:34 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:53:34 +0100 Subject: yum repo problem in f11-xo1/os10 In-Reply-To: <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> References: <967360.26615.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B159E6E.8090008@when.com> Steven M. Parrish wrote: > On Tuesday 01 December 2009 17:16:32 Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: >> Apparently the build used packages from F11-updates-testing (eg >> glibc-common) however this repo is not included in the yum repos of the >> build >> > updates-testing was supposed to be enabled. I'll check into it. > > Steven I suppose that is because enabling a repo at build time doesn't necessarily enable it in the resulting system. That's also why we're adding a sugar.repo file in the kickstarts %post part for SoaS (to preserve it after building). Since updates-testing is disabled by default in Fedora, I guess in this case a sed call on the updates-testing.repo to enable it would be enough... --Sebastian From cjb at laptop.org Wed Dec 2 00:19:37 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:19:37 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 50 Message-ID: <20091202001938.5B204FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os50 Compressed image size: 462.60mb (+0.17mb since build 49) Description of changes in this build: * Wake-on-wlan works now, if you have a B2 with hardware mods or B3 * Remove default Jabber server (#9666) Package changes since build 49: -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091130.1840.1.olpc.0940a43.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091201.1740.1.olpc.a8610d9.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091130.1840.1.olpc.0940a43.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091201.1740.1.olpc.a8610d9.i586 -libpurple-2.6.3-2.fc11.i586 +libpurple-2.6.4-1.fc11.i586 -unzip-5.52-10.fc11.i586 +unzip-5.52-11.fc11.i586 -wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-4.fc11.i586 +wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-6.fc11.i586 From pgf at laptop.org Wed Dec 2 00:29:41 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:29:41 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 49 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20091201_185443_856745_1FDCD445) References: <20091201202348.A8E82FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> (sfid-20091201_185443_856745_1FDCD445) Message-ID: <4711.1259713781@foxharp.boston.ma.us> christoph wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > > > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os49 > > > > If you have a 1.5 B2 (which almost everyone with a 1.5 machine does) > > and are using os47-os49, you'll need to turn off Automatic Power > > Management in the Sugar control panel, else the wireless device will > > go away after the first suspend and not come back until the next > > reboot. > > > > This doesn't happen on B3s, and we can throw a quirk into the kernel > > to fix it for B2s. We'll announce when there's a new build with a > > kernel that allows suspend/resume testing on B2s, but in the meantime > > you should avoid suspending them if you care about wireless. > > > > Mmm, I just tried updating my machine and it's been stuck at "Performing > incremental rsync." for at least 20 minutes now. Someone had mentioned that > the first person to access an update triggers some sort of procedure on the > server but I wouldn't expect it to take that long. (And yes, I had > disabled Automatic Power Management before starting the update.) > > What also seems odd is that even though Sugar's battery monitor still shows > 65% the power LED turned red during the update process. Now that I've > connected the AC adapter the power LED is indeed orange but the tray icon > still acts as though I'm running on batteries. this sounds like #9765 paul =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From quozl at laptop.org Wed Dec 2 00:31:17 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:31:17 +1100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 49 In-Reply-To: References: <20091201202348.A8E82FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <20091202003117.GI7278@us.netrek.org> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Mmm, I just tried updating my machine and it's been stuck at > "Performing incremental rsync." for at least 20 minutes now. To see if it is progressing, issue this command at a root shell prompt while the olpc-update is running ... tcpdump -i eth0 -n port 873 ... you should see traffic, in the form of lines of output. > What also seems odd is that even though Sugar's battery monitor still > shows 65% the power LED turned red during the update process. Now that > I've connected the AC adapter the power LED is indeed orange but the > tray icon still acts as though I'm running on batteries. Yes, known as #9765. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From mavrothal at yahoo.com Wed Dec 2 06:10:01 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:10:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: yum repo problem in f11-xo1/os10 In-Reply-To: <4B159E6E.8090008@when.com> Message-ID: <566606.2676.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> > Steven M. Parrish wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 December 2009 17:16:32 Yioryos > Asprobounitis wrote: > >> Apparently the build used packages from > F11-updates-testing (eg > >>???glibc-common) however this repo > is not included in the yum repos of the > >>???build > >> > > updates-testing was supposed to be enabled.? I'll > check into it. > > > > Steven Fedora-updates-testing is not activated but that's an easy fix. The problem is that a lot of packages (found the glibc related) are coming from "@F11-updates-testing" as yum list indicates. So you can not resolve dependencies or even reinstall. Thus no compiling :( Try to yum install gcc to see what I'm talking about. From dsd at laptop.org Wed Dec 2 08:17:01 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:17:01 +0000 Subject: yum repo problem in f11-xo1/os10 In-Reply-To: <4B159E6E.8090008@when.com> References: <967360.26615.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> <4B159E6E.8090008@when.com> Message-ID: <818423da0912020017v34b68f69h23d7b455fc879c7f@mail.gmail.com> 2009/12/1 Sebastian Dziallas : > I suppose that is because enabling a repo at build time doesn't necessarily > enable it in the resulting system. > > That's also why we're adding a sugar.repo file in the kickstarts %post part > for SoaS (to preserve it after building). Since updates-testing is disabled > by default in Fedora, I guess in this case a sed call on the > updates-testing.repo to enable it would be enough... We have scripts to make sure that the configurations match, but maybe they haven't been ported from XO-1.5 to XO-1 yet. However in this case I think the problem is maybe i586 vs i686. I guess the build ships with glibc i686 and then yum gets confused trying to 'upgrade' to i586 when booted from XO-1. Yioryos, please (always) include the full error message. Daniel From cjb at laptop.org Wed Dec 2 23:35:50 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:35:50 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 51 Message-ID: <20091202233550.8A1B4FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os51 Compressed image size: 459.06mb (-3.54mb since build 50) Description of changes in this build: * add ethtool hostsleep kernel patches for wake-on-wlan testing * add kernel camera driver, not hooked up all the way to Record yet * add new activities: SocialCalc, Get Books * olpc-kbdshim now handles the volume control keys in Sugar and GNOME Package changes since build 50: -cpio-2.9.90-5.fc11.i586 +cpio-2.9.90-6.fc11.i586 -gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.25-2.fc11.i586 +gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.25-3.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091201.1740.1.olpc.a8610d9.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091201.1740.1.olpc.a8610d9.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 -logrotate-3.7.8-2.fc11.i586 +logrotate-3.7.8-3.fc11.i586 -olpc-kbdshim-8-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-kbdshim-9-1.20091201git9d57880.fc11.i586 -sugar-0.84.7-1.fc11.11.i586 +sugar-0.84.8-1.fc11.i586 -sugar-toolkit-0.84.5-1.fc11.3.i586 +sugar-toolkit-0.84.6-1.fc11.i586 From mavrothal at yahoo.com Thu Dec 3 21:59:51 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:59:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: dracut(?) problem Message-ID: <784170.56153.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> On the XO-1 under F11-XO1/os10, I patched with unionfs and recompiled the 2.6.31_xo kernel, to include unionfs and some other modules. Installed on the XO-1 with "make install". Then I made the initrd with "dracut initrd_name kenel_version" (dracut-olpc v0.30) and fixed the simlinks in /boot. Everything looked good but rebooting resulted in a kernel panic with the attached message (picture of the screen actually). I do not really know if the problem is with the kernel or the initrd or both (the message title can be misleading-just a guess) but the initrd is really huge, ~18MB compressed (!) and the mount complains might be indicative. Should I have added specific dracut command line options or change the (any) config file? Sorry for asking here but I couldn't find any xo-dracut howto. Thanks for any suggestions/pointers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dracut_small.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 122492 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Thu Dec 3 22:04:40 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 23:04:40 +0100 Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <784170.56153.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <784170.56153.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <46a038f90912031404qca4668btfce78b76ae02b061@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Everything looked good but rebooting resulted in a kernel panic with the attached message (picture of the screen actually). Um. Not pretty. AIUI, reinstalling the kernel rpm re-runs the correct dracut+kernelmods magic, you could try that. However, this may be broken now that we are using versioned FSs again. hth, m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From mavrothal at yahoo.com Thu Dec 3 22:32:00 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:32:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <46a038f90912031404qca4668btfce78b76ae02b061@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <78859.6107.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Thu, 12/3/09, Martin Langhoff wrote: > From: Martin Langhoff > Subject: Re: dracut(?) problem > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 5:04 PM > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:59 PM, > Yioryos Asprobounitis > > wrote: > > Everything looked good but rebooting resulted in a > kernel panic with the attached message (picture of the > screen actually). > > Um. Not pretty. AIUI, reinstalling the kernel rpm re-runs > the correct > dracut+kernelmods magic, you could try that. If I only knew what you mean and how to do that?... :-) If the idea is to "recover" my XO this is done already. If you mean that reinstalling (some) kernel rpm will correct the dracut process and allow me to build the new initrd, I have no clue. Just to point out that I did not use rpmbuild for the new kernel. Just "make oldmenuconfig/make/make modules_install/make install" However, this > may be > broken now that we are using versioned FSs again. > > hth, > > > m > -- > martin.langhoff at gmail.com > martin at laptop.org > -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - working > code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 00:23:55 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:23:55 -0500 Subject: yum repo problem in f11-xo1/os10 In-Reply-To: <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> References: <967360.26615.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <200912031923.55629.smparrish@gmail.com> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 17:30:10 Steven M. Parrish wrote: > On Tuesday 01 December 2009 17:16:32 Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > Apparently the build used packages from F11-updates-testing (eg > > glibc-common) however this repo is not included in the yum repos of the > > build > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > > updates-testing was supposed to be enabled. I'll check into it. > > Steven > Just as an FYI this is just a build for testing atm, it was not supposed to be out in the wild. I am hoping to do alot of testing on it this weekend at FUDCon and do an official release early next week. Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #sugar, #fedora-devel, #packagekit From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 00:26:42 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:26:42 -0500 Subject: yum repo problem in f11-xo1/os10 In-Reply-To: <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> References: <967360.26615.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <200912011730.11100.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <200912031926.42535.smparrish@gmail.com> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 17:30:10 Steven M. Parrish wrote: > On Tuesday 01 December 2009 17:16:32 Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > Apparently the build used packages from F11-updates-testing (eg > > glibc-common) however this repo is not included in the yum repos of the > > build > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > > updates-testing was supposed to be enabled. I'll check into it. > > Steven > Forgot to add I found the issue. I had a HD failure and when restoring from backups I forgot to re-enable updates-testing in my custom Fedora-release RPM. This has been fixed, and will be in the final release Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #sugar, #fedora-devel, #packagekit From pbrobinson at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 01:06:24 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:06:24 +0000 Subject: Broken dependencies: hulahop In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0911270854v4c634d6dwa894dcfb1649fec0@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091127135753.1C8391F8092@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> <242851610911270707m1057492fifd8e6a82c021e380@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0911270854v4c634d6dwa894dcfb1649fec0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0912031706u371b7e19r73a176e3b09d55ed@mail.gmail.com> Hi Tomeu, On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Looks like we need a new srpm for python-xpcom, which has been split >> out the xulrunner tarball in 1.9.2 (so F13). >> >> Anybody knows who could help with this? > > I have it on my list to look at, they need to add back in the python > module in FF 3.6. I've already asked about it on fedora-devel but > haven't had a chance to look at what's needed to re-enable it and to > provide a patch. I just posted this to the fedora thread just as a FYI Having a quick google around the mozilla.org site I found the following mercurial repo [1] so it looks like its been split out to a separate project but I'm not 100% sure. Its used by hulahop/sugar-browse so it would be useful to add back in some form or another but I has issues building it but then I know very little about the mozilla build system. Cheers, Peter [1] http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 01:40:30 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:40:30 -0500 Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <46a038f90912031404qca4668btfce78b76ae02b061@mail.gmail.com> References: <784170.56153.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <46a038f90912031404qca4668btfce78b76ae02b061@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200912032040.30808.smparrish@gmail.com> On Thursday 03 December 2009 17:04:40 Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis > > wrote: > > Everything looked good but rebooting resulted in a kernel panic with the > > attached message (picture of the screen actually). > > Um. Not pretty. AIUI, reinstalling the kernel rpm re-runs the correct > dracut+kernelmods magic, you could try that. However, this may be > broken now that we are using versioned FSs again. > > hth, > > > m > The XO-1 releases are not currently using a versioned FS. That is something I hope to work on this weekend at FUDCon. Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #sugar, #fedora-devel, #packagekit From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 02:12:36 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:12:36 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 51 In-Reply-To: <20091202233550.8A1B4FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> References: <20091202233550.8A1B4FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <200912032112.36879.smparrish@gmail.com> On Wednesday 02 December 2009 18:35:50 Chris Ball wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os51 > > Compressed image size: 459.06mb (-3.54mb since build 50) > > Description of changes in this build: > * add ethtool hostsleep kernel patches for wake-on-wlan testing > * add kernel camera driver, not hooked up all the way to Record yet > * add new activities: SocialCalc, Get Books > * olpc-kbdshim now handles the volume control keys in Sugar and GNOME > > Package changes since build 50: > > -cpio-2.9.90-5.fc11.i586 > +cpio-2.9.90-6.fc11.i586 > -gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.25-2.fc11.i586 > +gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.25-3.fc11.i586 > -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091201.1740.1.olpc.a8610d9.i586 > +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 > -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091201.1740.1.olpc.a8610d9.i586 > +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 > -logrotate-3.7.8-2.fc11.i586 > +logrotate-3.7.8-3.fc11.i586 > -olpc-kbdshim-8-1.fc11.i586 > +olpc-kbdshim-9-1.20091201git9d57880.fc11.i586 > -sugar-0.84.7-1.fc11.11.i586 > +sugar-0.84.8-1.fc11.i586 > -sugar-toolkit-0.84.5-1.fc11.3.i586 > +sugar-toolkit-0.84.6-1.fc11.i586 > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > Installed this on my XO 1.5 tonight and so far found 1 issue. Wireless dies after about a minute. in both sugar and gnome I lose wireless connectivity. Can't reconnect without a complete reboot, in fact when it drops out I can no longer see any wireless connections. ifconfig only shows the loopback device present Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #sugar, #fedora-devel, #packagekit From quozl at laptop.org Fri Dec 4 02:27:45 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:27:45 +1100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 51 In-Reply-To: <200912032112.36879.smparrish@gmail.com> References: <20091202233550.8A1B4FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> <200912032112.36879.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091204022745.GD2531@us.netrek.org> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > Installed this on my XO 1.5 tonight and so far found 1 issue. Wireless dies > after about a minute. in both sugar and gnome I lose wireless connectivity. > Can't reconnect without a complete reboot, in fact when it drops out I can no > longer see any wireless connections. > > ifconfig only shows the loopback device present (a) wireless will be stopped by suspend and resume unless you have the ECO to correct for it, (b) see also #9802 for a way to think you have suspend and resume disabled but really don't ... workaround is to toggle the checkbox. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From cjb at laptop.org Fri Dec 4 05:40:17 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 00:40:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 52 Message-ID: <20091204054017.D3199FA8DE@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os52 Compressed image size: 659.81mb (+200.74mb since build 51) Description of changes in this build: * This build contains firmware Q3A18; it should automatically upgrade to it. * Disable Xv in openchrome until it is fixed (#9719) * Add Wikipedia activities, fixed for 0.84 (#9794) * Include serial drivers for 3G modems (#9684) * /bootpart was being mounted read-only due to hardware bug (#9792) * Fix for booting from alternate install; testable in the *next* build (#9749) Package changes since build 51: +bootfw-q3a18-1.unsigned.i386 -fontpackages-filesystem-1.35-1.fc11.noarch +fontpackages-filesystem-1.41-1.fc11.noarch -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 -libtool-ltdl-2.2.6-11.fc11.1.i586 +libtool-ltdl-2.2.6-11.fc11.2.i586 -mdadm-3.0.3-1.fc11.i586 +mdadm-3.0.3-2.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-1.fc11.1.i586 +xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-1.fc11.2.i586 From pgf at laptop.org Fri Dec 4 05:47:55 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:47:55 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 52 In-Reply-To: <20091204054017.D3199FA8DE@dev.laptop.org> (sfid-20091204_004056_324244_566AC53E) References: <20091204054017.D3199FA8DE@dev.laptop.org> (sfid-20091204_004056_324244_566AC53E) Message-ID: <5395.1259905675@foxharp.boston.ma.us> chris wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os52 > > Compressed image size: 659.81mb (+200.74mb since build 51) > > Description of changes in this build: > * This build contains firmware Q3A18; it should automatically upgrade to it. > * Disable Xv in openchrome until it is fixed (#9719) > * Add Wikipedia activities, fixed for 0.84 (#9794) > * Include serial drivers for 3G modems (#9684) due to an oversight on my part, the USB_OPTION_SERIAL config change didn't make it into this build. next one for sure. paul > * /bootpart was being mounted read-only due to hardware bug (#9792) > * Fix for booting from alternate install; testable in the *next* build (#9749) > > Package changes since build 51: > > +bootfw-q3a18-1.unsigned.i386 > -fontpackages-filesystem-1.35-1.fc11.noarch > +fontpackages-filesystem-1.41-1.fc11.noarch > -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 > +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 > -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091202.1210.1.olpc.0afbb69.i586 > +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 > -libtool-ltdl-2.2.6-11.fc11.1.i586 > +libtool-ltdl-2.2.6-11.fc11.2.i586 > -mdadm-3.0.3-1.fc11.i586 > +mdadm-3.0.3-2.fc11.i586 > -xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-1.fc11.1.i586 > +xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-1.fc11.2.i586 > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel at lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 08:49:44 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 03:49:44 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 51 In-Reply-To: <20091204022745.GD2531@us.netrek.org> References: <20091202233550.8A1B4FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> <200912032112.36879.smparrish@gmail.com> <20091204022745.GD2531@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <200912040349.45592.smparrish@gmail.com> On Thursday 03 December 2009 21:27:45 James Cameron wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > > Installed this on my XO 1.5 tonight and so far found 1 issue. Wireless > > dies after about a minute. in both sugar and gnome I lose wireless > > connectivity. Can't reconnect without a complete reboot, in fact when it > > drops out I can no longer see any wireless connections. > > > > ifconfig only shows the loopback device present > > (a) wireless will be stopped by suspend and resume unless you have the > ECO to correct for it, > > (b) see also #9802 for a way to think you have suspend and resume > disabled but really don't ... workaround is to toggle the checkbox. > That I was aware of but this happens just after signing in and connecting. System has not been suspended its in use. Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #sugar, #fedora-devel, #packagekit From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 09:38:37 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 04:38:37 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 51 In-Reply-To: <20091204022745.GD2531@us.netrek.org> References: <20091202233550.8A1B4FA8C1@dev.laptop.org> <200912032112.36879.smparrish@gmail.com> <20091204022745.GD2531@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <200912040438.37608.smparrish@gmail.com> On Thursday 03 December 2009 21:27:45 James Cameron wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > > Installed this on my XO 1.5 tonight and so far found 1 issue. Wireless > > dies after about a minute. in both sugar and gnome I lose wireless > > connectivity. Can't reconnect without a complete reboot, in fact when it > > drops out I can no longer see any wireless connections. > > > > ifconfig only shows the loopback device present > > (a) wireless will be stopped by suspend and resume unless you have the > ECO to correct for it, > > (b) see also #9802 for a way to think you have suspend and resume > disabled but really don't ... workaround is to toggle the checkbox. > Turns out you were right. To me it just didn't seem like the same issue. That will teach me. Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #sugar, #fedora-devel, #packagekit From tomeu at sugarlabs.org Fri Dec 4 14:31:26 2009 From: tomeu at sugarlabs.org (Tomeu Vizoso) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:31:26 +0000 Subject: Broken dependencies: hulahop In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0912031706u371b7e19r73a176e3b09d55ed@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091127135753.1C8391F8092@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> <242851610911270707m1057492fifd8e6a82c021e380@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0911270854v4c634d6dwa894dcfb1649fec0@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912031706u371b7e19r73a176e3b09d55ed@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <242851610912040631s6a6d458eobc3219673c657919@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 01:06, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> Looks like we need a new srpm for python-xpcom, which has been split >>> out the xulrunner tarball in 1.9.2 (so F13). >>> >>> Anybody knows who could help with this? >> >> I have it on my list to look at, they need to add back in the python >> module in FF 3.6. I've already asked about it on fedora-devel but >> haven't had a chance to look at what's needed to re-enable it and to >> provide a patch. > > I just posted this to the fedora thread just as a FYI > > Having a quick google around the mozilla.org site I found the > following mercurial repo [1] so it looks like its been split out to a > separate project but I'm not 100% sure. Its used by > hulahop/sugar-browse so it would be useful to add back in some form or > another but I has issues building it but then I know very little about > the mozilla build system. Hi, I'm trying to get upstream to make a release, but I'm having trouble getting an answer since thanksgiving started. Will keep trying. Regards, Tomeu > Cheers, > Peter > > [1] http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom > -- ?Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.? - David Farning From tomeu at sugarlabs.org Fri Dec 4 15:01:34 2009 From: tomeu at sugarlabs.org (Tomeu Vizoso) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:01:34 +0000 Subject: [IAEP] noob download Sugar for XO In-Reply-To: <46a038f90912040652o292a7403iecaffada29f45406@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B189296.1040103@gmail.com> <4B1918D3.1020107@gmail.com> <46a038f90912040652o292a7403iecaffada29f45406@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <242851610912040701k2b7488afsae74786a263bcf26@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 14:52, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote: >> Perhaps it would be worthwhile creating a collection on >> http://activities.sugarlabs.org for 802 activities. > > That'd be awesome! > >> It would be great if more >> hands could help with this effort. > > Yes -- we need help. Steven Parrish is spinning builds, but stuff > needs testing, filing bugs with Fedora (and following up on them), > wrestling upstreams (X.org, kernel, etc) to fix bugs / land patches. > > This page is the entry point for anyone wanting to help with F11+Sugar > 0.84 on XO-1. > > Walter has mentioned that he thinks that probably backporting Sugar > 0.86 to F11 is low-hanging fruit. If anyone can test that assumption, > and provide a spin with that integration, it'd be a great thing too. Should be a matter of rebuilding the rpms, maybe even you can install the f12 rpms on f11 and have it working. If someone with some knowledge of fedora packaging wants to give it a try, I'm happy to help. Regards, Tomeu > >>> BTW, Hernan Pachas was asking for something similar, apparently with similar >>> luck > > Hern?n is doing the same thing that Yama, but with a few more XOs ;-) > > > > m > -- > ?martin.langhoff at gmail.com > ?martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect > ?- ask interesting questions > ?- don't get distracted with shiny stuff ?- working code first > ?- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > -- ?Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.? - David Farning From pbrobinson at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 15:54:20 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:54:20 +0000 Subject: Broken dependencies: hulahop In-Reply-To: <242851610912040631s6a6d458eobc3219673c657919@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091127135753.1C8391F8092@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> <242851610911270707m1057492fifd8e6a82c021e380@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0911270854v4c634d6dwa894dcfb1649fec0@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912031706u371b7e19r73a176e3b09d55ed@mail.gmail.com> <242851610912040631s6a6d458eobc3219673c657919@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0912040754w347f6db5k2034a02a6f80d54c@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 01:06, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Hi Tomeu, >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>> Looks like we need a new srpm for python-xpcom, which has been split >>>> out the xulrunner tarball in 1.9.2 (so F13). >>>> >>>> Anybody knows who could help with this? >>> >>> I have it on my list to look at, they need to add back in the python >>> module in FF 3.6. I've already asked about it on fedora-devel but >>> haven't had a chance to look at what's needed to re-enable it and to >>> provide a patch. >> >> I just posted this to the fedora thread just as a FYI >> >> Having a quick google around the mozilla.org site I found the >> following mercurial repo [1] so it looks like its been split out to a >> separate project but I'm not 100% sure. Its used by >> hulahop/sugar-browse so it would be useful to add back in some form or >> another but I has issues building it but then I know very little about >> the mozilla build system. > > Hi, > > I'm trying to get upstream to make a release, but I'm having trouble > getting an answer since thanksgiving started. Will keep trying. I also saw a bug [1] by Martin, one of the RH moz guys, to get a version number in the autoconf so he can build and package it up so it looks like its in hand. Cheers, Peter [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532052 From cjb at laptop.org Fri Dec 4 15:59:06 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:59:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 53 Message-ID: <20091204155906.5BF97FA8DE@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os53 Compressed image size: 659.12mb (-0.68mb since build 52) Description of changes in this build: * working camera! * kernel exposes wakeup reasons to userspace (#9793) * GSM driver really included this time (#9684) * add OLPC CA certificate (#9624) * add csound-python to build (#9583) * booting from alternate install can be tested in this build * remove Log and Terminal from default favorites view (#9796) Package changes since build 52: -csound-5.10.1-13.fc11.i586 +csound-5.10.1-14.fc11.i586 +csound-python-5.10.1-14.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091204.0910.1.olpc.e81f432.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091204.0910.1.olpc.e81f432.i586 -olpc-utils-1.0.12-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-utils-1.0.13-1.fc11.i586 From cjb at laptop.org Fri Dec 4 17:30:11 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:30:11 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 52 In-Reply-To: <4B18E260.6020905@laptop.org> (Richard A. Smith's message of "Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:20:16 -0500") References: <20091204054017.D3199FA8DE@dev.laptop.org> <4B18E260.6020905@laptop.org> Message-ID: Hi, >> * Add Wikipedia activities, fixed for 0.84 (#9794) > Ugh! You just made it almost impossible for me to download a > build here in China. Can you back this change out until we are > done with C1 bring up. No, I don't think so. We're getting ready to release, and it's important to prepare the build that we think we're going to ship. (It's not even clear to me that C1 bringup ends *before* we ship!) An example of why this is important: to my embarrassment, I didn't notice until yesterday morning that the Wikipedia activities did not work on F11/0.84, and never had; I had to spend a few hours fixing them up. I don't want to have any more surprises like that. > Or make us a special build with out this extra 200 megs? This is more likely. Let's talk about it on IRC. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 5 06:50:14 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:50:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 Message-ID: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os54 Compressed image size: 689.79mb (+30.67mb since build 53) This is the first release candidate (RC1) for the XO-1.5 F11 release! Here are some release-note-worthy bugs we know about in this RC and intend to fix soon: * If you have a B2 without hardware mods, you must disable suspend using Control Panel->Power->Automatic power management, else your wireless device will disconnect on suspend and not come back until the next reboot. * The camera will stop working after the first suspend. (#9809) * If you're using wireless with suspend on a B2+mods or B3, wireless may crash when coming out of suspend, requiring a reboot. (#9744) * The "create a network" section on the frame doesn't work if your nickname has more than five characters in. (#9807) Please help us find more bugs, and file them; if something doesn't work the way you think it should, and it's not represented on the bug list at http://dev.laptop.org/1.5, we need you to file it so that we can decide whether to fix it in the released build. Changes from previous build os53: * Power management settings are preserved across olpc-update (#9802) * Add inkscape, gimp, audacity (#9786) Package changes since build 53: +ImageMagick-6.5.1.2-1.fc11.i586 +ImageMagick-c++-6.5.1.2-1.fc11.i586 +OpenEXR-libs-1.6.1-8.fc11.i586 +aalib-libs-1.4.0-0.17.rc5.fc11.i586 +audacity-1.3.9-0.3.beta.fc11.i586 +babl-0.0.22-3.fc11.i586 +cairomm-1.8.0-1.fc11.i586 -crda-1.1.0_2009.11.10-1.fc11.i586 +crda-1.1.0_2009.11.25-1.fc11.i586 -expat-2.0.1-6.fc11.1.i586 +expat-2.0.1-8.fc11.i586 -fontconfig-2.7.2-1.fc11.i586 +fontconfig-2.8.0-1.fc11.i586 +gc-7.1-7.fc11.i586 +gegl-0.0.22-3.fc11.i586 +gimp-2.6.7-3.fc11.i586 +gimp-libs-2.6.7-3.fc11.i586 +glibmm24-2.20.0-2.fc11.i586 +gpm-libs-1.20.6-3.fc11.i586 +gsl-1.12-3.fc11.i586 +gtkmm24-2.16.0-1.fc11.i586 +gtkspell-2.0.16-1.fc11.i586 +ilmbase-1.0.1-4.fc11.i586 +inkscape-0.47-1.fc11.i586 +libid3tag-0.15.1b-8.fc11.i586 +libmng-1.0.10-2.fc11.i586 +libopenraw-0.0.5-3.fc11.i586 +libsamplerate-0.1.6-2.fc11.i586 +libsigc++20-2.2.2-3.fc11.i586 +libspiro-20071029-2.fc11.i586 -libtool-ltdl-2.2.6-11.fc11.2.i586 +libtool-ltdl-2.2.6-11.fc11.3.i586 -libxcb-1.2-4.fc11.i586 +libxcb-1.2-5.fc11.i586 -nautilus-2.26.4-2.fc11.i586 +nautilus-2.26.4-3.fc11.i586 -nautilus-extensions-2.26.4-2.fc11.i586 +nautilus-extensions-2.26.4-3.fc11.i586 -ohm-0.1.1-9.28.20091202git.fc11.i586 +ohm-0.1.1-9.32.20091205git.fc11.i586 +pangomm-2.24.0-1.fc11.i586 +soundtouch-1.4.0-2.fc11.i586 +vamp-plugin-sdk-2.0-5.fc11.i586 -vim-minimal-7.2.148-1.fc11.i586 +vim-minimal-7.2.315-1.fc11.i586 +wxBase-2.8.10-5.fc11.i586 +wxGTK-2.8.10-5.fc11.i586 -xapian-bindings-python-1.0.16-1.fc11.i586 +xapian-bindings-python-1.0.17-2.fc11.i586 -xapian-core-libs-1.0.16-1.fc11.i586 +xapian-core-libs-1.0.17-1.fc11.i586 +xdg-utils-1.0.2-8.20081121cvs.fc11.noarch From pbrobinson at gmail.com Sat Dec 5 21:56:54 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:56:54 +0000 Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 In-Reply-To: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> References: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> Hi Chris, > This is the first release candidate (RC1) for the XO-1.5 F11 release! > > Here are some release-note-worthy bugs we know about in this RC and > intend to fix soon: > > ?* If you have a B2 without hardware mods, you must disable suspend > ? using Control Panel->Power->Automatic power management, else your > ? wireless device will disconnect on suspend and not come back until > ? the next reboot. > > ?* The camera will stop working after the first suspend. ?(#9809) > > ?* If you're using wireless with suspend on a B2+mods or B3, wireless > ? may crash when coming out of suspend, requiring a reboot. ?(#9744) > > ?* The "create a network" section on the frame doesn't work if your > ? nickname has more than five characters in. ?(#9807) > > Please help us find more bugs, and file them; if something doesn't work > the way you think it should, and it's not represented on the bug list at > http://dev.laptop.org/1.5, we need you to file it so that we can decide > whether to fix it in the released build. I've just run this up on my newly acquired XO 1.5 (Thanks Adam) and I have a dmesg error (even on a clean reboot) "libertas: failed to load helper firmware". also I've got a number of sdhci register dumps (not sure if they're an issue). Cheers, Peter From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 5 22:03:48 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:03:48 -0500 Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Robinson's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:56:54 +0000") References: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Peter, > I've just run this up on my newly acquired XO 1.5 (Thanks Adam) > and I have a dmesg error (even on a clean reboot) "libertas: > failed to load helper firmware". also I've got a number of sdhci > register dumps (not sure if they're an issue). Please file a bug with dmesg output, this sounds odd; could be hardware. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From pbrobinson at gmail.com Sat Dec 5 22:38:30 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:38:30 +0000 Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 In-Reply-To: References: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0912051438r63bb1cebvf9f7b51420cd877a@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Peter, > > ? > I've just run this up on my newly acquired XO 1.5 (Thanks Adam) > ? > and I have a dmesg error (even on a clean reboot) "libertas: > ? > failed to load helper firmware". also I've got a number of sdhci > ? > register dumps (not sure if they're an issue). > > Please file a bug with dmesg output, this sounds odd; could be hardware. Ticket is http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9826 From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 5 22:41:59 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:41:59 -0500 Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0912051438r63bb1cebvf9f7b51420cd877a@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Robinson's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:38:30 +0000") References: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912051438r63bb1cebvf9f7b51420cd877a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Peter, > Ticket is http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9826 You're just hitting the B2 wifi resume bug: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-December/026692.html Please make sure other folks Adam gave laptops to know to expect this; it will happen on every one. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From pbrobinson at gmail.com Sat Dec 5 22:46:41 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:46:41 +0000 Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 In-Reply-To: References: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912051438r63bb1cebvf9f7b51420cd877a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0912051446n7c025613j351ca8ef061ce7f3@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Peter, > > ? > Ticket is http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9826 > > You're just hitting the B2 wifi resume bug: > > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-December/026692.html > > Please make sure other folks Adam gave laptops to know to expect this; > it will happen on every one. That wasn't from resume though, it was from power on. Is that the same issue? Peter From pbrobinson at gmail.com Sat Dec 5 22:47:10 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:47:10 +0000 Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0912051446n7c025613j351ca8ef061ce7f3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912051438r63bb1cebvf9f7b51420cd877a@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912051446n7c025613j351ca8ef061ce7f3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0912051447u9a99b41hf3818ceda781836e@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> ? > Ticket is http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9826 >> >> You're just hitting the B2 wifi resume bug: >> >> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-December/026692.html >> >> Please make sure other folks Adam gave laptops to know to expect this; >> it will happen on every one. > > That wasn't from resume though, it was from power on. Is that the same issue? Oh, and I've turned off the power management too. Peter From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 5 22:47:07 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:47:07 -0500 Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 1 In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0912051446n7c025613j351ca8ef061ce7f3@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Robinson's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:46:41 +0000") References: <20091205065015.81B9EFA884@dev.laptop.org> <5256d0b0912051356r3a990070ic17abcfa0f92d5a8@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912051438r63bb1cebvf9f7b51420cd877a@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0912051446n7c025613j351ca8ef061ce7f3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi, > That wasn't from resume though, it was from power on. Is that the > same issue? Yes, because automatic suspend/resume is turned on. The bug is from resume, as shown in the dmesg attached to #9826. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From mikus at bga.com Mon Dec 7 14:37:15 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:37:15 -0600 Subject: xdpyinfo - cursor Message-ID: <4B1D131B.3070300@bga.com> os54. Noticed xdpyinfo telling me - largest cursor: 1200x900 Oughtn't that be smaller ? mikus From dsd at laptop.org Tue Dec 8 13:08:43 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:08:43 +0000 Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <784170.56153.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <784170.56153.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1260277723.2140.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi Yioryos, On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:59 -0800, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > On the XO-1 under F11-XO1/os10, I patched with unionfs and recompiled the 2.6.31_xo kernel, to include unionfs and some other modules. > Installed on the XO-1 with "make install". > Then I made the initrd with "dracut initrd_name kenel_version" (dracut-olpc v0.30) and fixed the simlinks in /boot. > Everything looked good but rebooting resulted in a kernel panic with the attached message (picture of the screen actually). The way we develop is that we make changes to the kernel, commit it to git, then: make clean distclean make xo_1-kernel-rpm (or xo_1_5-kernel-rpm) Then you have a kernel RPM that you can install on the XO, which will take care of the initramfs for you. If you choose to develop another way then you're going to have to look carefully at the rpm spec file and make sure that you reproduce all the little things that it does. Daniel From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Dec 8 14:59:54 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:59:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <1260277723.2140.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <57275.65374.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> OK. I'll try learn more about git till then could you if this work flow has major flaws _if done locally_ ? git clone git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-2.6 cd olpc-2.6 commit -a # is the tree included already? (patch kernel) # do I need to "git add" the patch file and the file/folders that the patch generates? make clean distclean # this goes here, right? make xo_1_defconfig make menuconfig make commit -a #do I need this for the next steps? make xo_1-kernel-rpm Yes? Thx for your help (I know is a very busy time) --- On Tue, 12/8/09, Daniel Drake wrote: > From: Daniel Drake > Subject: Re: dracut(?) problem > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 8:08 AM > Hi Yioryos, > > On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:59 -0800, Yioryos Asprobounitis > wrote: > > On the XO-1 under F11-XO1/os10, I patched with unionfs > and recompiled the 2.6.31_xo kernel, to include unionfs and > some other modules. > > Installed on the XO-1 with "make install". > > Then I made the initrd with "dracut initrd_name > kenel_version" (dracut-olpc v0.30) and fixed the simlinks in > /boot. > > Everything looked good but rebooting resulted in a > kernel panic with the attached message (picture of the > screen actually). > > The way we develop is that we make changes to the kernel, > commit it to > git, then: > > ??? make clean distclean > ??? make xo_1-kernel-rpm > > (or xo_1_5-kernel-rpm) > > > Then you have a kernel RPM that you can install on the XO, > which will > take care of the initramfs for you. > > If you choose to develop another way then you're going to > have to look > carefully at the rpm spec file and make sure that you > reproduce all the > little things that it does. > > Daniel > > > From dsd at laptop.org Tue Dec 8 16:08:16 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:08:16 +0000 Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <57275.65374.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <57275.65374.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1260288496.2140.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 06:59 -0800, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > OK. I'll try learn more about git till then could you if this work flow has major flaws _if done locally_ ? > > git clone git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-2.6 > cd olpc-2.6 > commit -a # is the tree included already? No need to do this > (patch kernel) # do I need to "git add" the patch file and the file/folders that the patch generates? Yes, add all your changes and make a commit at this point. > make clean distclean # this goes here, right? Yes > make xo_1_defconfig > make menuconfig > make > commit -a #do I need this for the next steps? Drop all these > make xo_1-kernel-rpm Then do this. Daniel From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Dec 8 21:36:04 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:36:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <1260288496.2140.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <711639.41736.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Tue, 12/8/09, Daniel Drake wrote: > From: Daniel Drake > Subject: Re: dracut(?) problem > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 11:08 AM > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 06:59 -0800, > Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > OK. I'll try learn more about git till then could you > if this work flow has major flaws _if done locally_ ? > > > > git clone git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-2.6 > > cd olpc-2.6 > > > commit -a # is the tree included already? > > No need to do this > > > (patch kernel) # do I need to "git add" the patch file > and the file/folders that the patch generates? > > Yes, add all your changes and make a commit at this point. > > > make clean distclean # this goes here, right? > > Yes > > > make xo_1_defconfig > > make menuconfig > > make > > commit -a #do I need this for the next steps? > > Drop all these > > > make xo_1-kernel-rpm > > Then do this. Excellent, thanks. This makes building a breeze but patching/configuring a nightmare (for me). Is there any special kernel patching/configuration tool or everything is done manually? Oh well, maybe when XO-1.5 os is out. > > Daniel > > > From dsd at laptop.org Wed Dec 9 10:07:58 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:07:58 +0000 Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <711639.41736.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <1260288496.2140.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <711639.41736.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <818423da0912090207u544adbdeu153e5cfeb15d1c6d@mail.gmail.com> 2009/12/8 Yioryos Asprobounitis : > Excellent, thanks. > This makes building a breeze but patching/configuring a nightmare (for me). Is there any special kernel patching/configuration tool or everything is done manually? A nightmare, how? All it is is downloading the kernel source, patching it and compiling it. I don't see how it could be done any other way. Daniel From mavrothal at yahoo.com Wed Dec 9 12:03:09 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 04:03:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <818423da0912090207u544adbdeu153e5cfeb15d1c6d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <184729.75673.qm@web65516.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Wed, 12/9/09, Daniel Drake wrote: > From: Daniel Drake > Subject: Re: dracut(?) problem > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 5:07 AM > 2009/12/8 Yioryos Asprobounitis > : > > Excellent, thanks. > > This makes building a breeze but patching/configuring > a nightmare (for me). Is there any special kernel > patching/configuration tool or everything is done manually? > > A nightmare, how? > All it is is downloading the kernel source, patching it and > compiling > it.? I don't see how it could be done any other way. OK. I'm lost Cloning the Git olpc-2.6 a) kernel patches fail b) a lot of kernel sources are missing. Thus a nightmare. >From what I understood "make xo_1-kernel-rpm" will work only with the git clone and _not_ with the kernel src.rpm. Is that wrong. Does it also work with the kernel sources provided in http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/f11-xo1/ ??? (I guess I could try it :-) > > Daniel > From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Wed Dec 9 12:45:52 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:45:52 +0100 Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <184729.75673.qm@web65516.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <818423da0912090207u544adbdeu153e5cfeb15d1c6d@mail.gmail.com> <184729.75673.qm@web65516.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <46a038f90912090445h150d320co33b075c142c72342@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Cloning the Git olpc-2.6 a) kernel patches fail are you doing git-checkout to get the right branch? Right after the clone you'll be on 'master' which isn't useful... m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From mavrothal at yahoo.com Wed Dec 9 14:09:42 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:09:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <46a038f90912090445h150d320co33b075c142c72342@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <944298.12726.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Wed, 12/9/09, Martin Langhoff wrote: > From: Martin Langhoff > Subject: Re: dracut(?) problem > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: "Daniel Drake" , fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 7:45 AM > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, > Yioryos Asprobounitis > > wrote: > > > Cloning the Git olpc-2.6 a) kernel patches fail > > are you? doing git-checkout to get the right branch? > Right after the > clone you'll be on 'master' which isn't useful... > No I didn't. I guess the "olpc-2.6.31" is the branch of interest at the time. Correct?? Does your replay also means that "make xo_1-kernel-rpm" will _not_ work with kernel src.rpm and/or that "normal" 2.6.31 kernel patches should work on the olpc-2.6.31 git branch? Thx > > m > -- > martin.langhoff at gmail.com > martin at laptop.org > -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - working > code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > From cjb at laptop.org Wed Dec 9 20:24:08 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:24:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 2 Message-ID: <20091209202409.4E22DFA8E0@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os55 Compressed image size: 693.39mb (+3.60mb since build 54) This is the second release candidate (RC1) for the XO-1.5 F11 release! Here are some release-note-worthy bugs we know about in this RC and intend to fix soon: * If you have a B2 without hardware mods, you must disable suspend using Control Panel->Power->Automatic power management, else your wireless device will disconnect on suspend and not come back until the next reboot. * The camera will stop working after the first suspend. (#9809) * The "create a network" section on the frame doesn't work if your nickname has more than five characters in. (#9807) Please help us find more bugs, and file them; if something doesn't work the way you think it should, and it's not represented on the bug list at http://dev.laptop.org/1.5, we need you to file it so that we can decide whether to fix it in the released build. Changes from previous build os54: * Wakeup keypress is no longer repeated (#9779) * Add manufacturing run-in tests to the build (#9840) * Boot from alternate install should work (#9628) * User brightness choices now preserved across suspend (#9805) * Go into deep sleep after five minutes in suspend (#9847) * Backlight stays dimmed when woken by wlan packet or battery (#9848) * "Switch desktop" strings were untranslated (#9814) * Added Finance and StopWatch activities * Fix pippy examples (#9479) * Added wget, strace (#9822) * Fix "Sugar can't mount disks as inactive user" (#9828) * Fix font size changes, stop button pushed off toolbar (#9823) Package changes since build 54: -PolicyKit-olpc-1.2-2.fc11.noarch +PolicyKit-olpc-1.3-1.fc11.noarch -bootfw-q3a18-1.unsigned.i386 +bootfw-q3a20-1.unsigned.i386 -dracut-modules-olpc-0.3.0-1.fc11.i586 +dracut-modules-olpc-0.3.1-1.fc11.i586 -initscripts-8.95-1.i586 +initscripts-8.95.1-1.i586 -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091204.0910.1.olpc.e81f432.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091208.1640.1.olpc.7a5228e.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091204.0910.1.olpc.e81f432.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091208.1640.1.olpc.7a5228e.i586 -ohm-0.1.1-9.32.20091205git.fc11.i586 +ohm-0.1.1-9.34.20091209git.fc11.i586 +olpc-runin-tests-0.1-1.noarch -olpc-switch-desktop-0.6-1.fc11.noarch +olpc-switch-desktop-0.7-1.fc11.noarch -python-BeautifulSoup-3.0.7a-1.fc11.noarch +python-BeautifulSoup-3.0.8-1.fc11.noarch -rsync-3.0.6-0.fc11.i586 +rsync-3.0.6-1.fc11.i586 -sqlite-3.6.17-1.fc11.i586 +sqlite-3.6.20-1.fc11.i586 +strace-4.5.19-1.fc11.i586 +sugar-datastore-0.84.0-1.fc11.i586 -sugar-datastore-0.84.0-2.fc11.i586 -sugar-toolkit-0.84.6-1.fc11.i586 +sugar-toolkit-0.84.7-1.fc11.i586 -sugar-update-control-0.21-2.fc11.noarch +sugar-update-control-0.23-1.fc11.noarch -vte-0.20.5-1.fc11.i586 +vte-0.20.5-2.fc11.i586 +wget-1.12-2.fc11.i586 From cjb at laptop.org Thu Dec 10 01:50:32 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:50:32 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 56 Message-ID: <20091210015032.3B370FA8E0@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os56 Compressed image size: 691.46mb (-1.93mb since build 55) Description of changes in this build: * New revision of manufacturing run-in tests (#9840) Package changes since build 55: +lm_sensors-3.1.0-1.fc11.i586 +md5deep-3.4-1.fc11.i586 +memtester-4.1.2-1.fc11.i586 -olpc-runin-tests-0.1-1.noarch +olpc-runin-tests-0.1-2.noarch From cjb at laptop.org Fri Dec 11 06:17:48 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:17:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 57 Message-ID: <20091211061749.1B041FA884@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os57 Compressed image size: 695.87mb (+4.41mb since build 56) Description of changes in this build: * Now building from a static repo, so only changes we push are included. * Camera resume bug is fixed! (#9809) * OHM now always powers down WLAN in sleep mode (#9856) * Fix manufacturing run-in tests (#9840) Package changes since build 56: -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091208.1640.1.olpc.7a5228e.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091210.0210.1.olpc.b5dd718.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091208.1640.1.olpc.7a5228e.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091210.0210.1.olpc.b5dd718.i586 -ohm-0.1.1-9.34.20091209git.fc11.i586 +ohm-0.1.1-9.38.20091211git.fc11.i586 -olpc-runin-tests-0.1-2.noarch +olpc-runin-tests-0.2-1.noarch From mikus at bga.com Fri Dec 11 16:27:11 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:27:11 -0600 Subject: os57 - blocker - suspend prevents me from viewing screen Message-ID: <4B2272DF.9050005@bga.com> XO-1.5 B2. This sounds like #9865. Made the mistake of NOT disabling suspend the first thing after installing os57. While I was typing on my external USB keyboard, the screen dimmed and before I could react, the power LED went off (in other words, the XO-1,5 went into suspend, with the power LED slowly pulsing); soon the screen went dark. Pressed the power button. The screen briefly "flashed" into visibility, then went dark again (and the power LED went back to pulsing). I was unable to discover anything I could do that would let the screen get back to being usable. Rebooted. mikus From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 11 17:58:34 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:58:34 -0500 Subject: New F11 for the XO-1 Build 10 Message-ID: <200912111258.35265.smparrish@gmail.com> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/XO-1/builds/OS10 Today I have released build 10 for the XO-1. This release will require you to flash it onto your XO-1 so you will loose everything. Please be sure to backup you home directory before installing. Release notes can be found here http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1#Current_release:__OS10 Enjoy. -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #fedora-edu, #sugar, #packagekit From smparrish at gmail.com Fri Dec 11 18:55:56 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:55:56 -0500 Subject: Some testing notes for OS10 for the XO-1 Message-ID: <200912111355.57004.smparrish@gmail.com> If you are going to try out OS10 for the XO-1 here are a few things that need testing. Does it boot consistently into Sugar? Gnome? Any strange lockups? If so what were you doing? Can you upgrade packages using "yum update" from the command line? Does sound work? Can you suspend? Does it wake up? Please report any issues you have. Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #fedora-edu, #sugar, #packagekit From gary at garycmartin.com Fri Dec 11 19:41:43 2009 From: gary at garycmartin.com (Gary C Martin) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:41:43 +0000 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 53 In-Reply-To: <20091204155906.5BF97FA8DE@dev.laptop.org> References: <20091204155906.5BF97FA8DE@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: Hi Chris, On 4 Dec 2009, at 15:59, Chris Ball wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os53 > > Compressed image size: 659.12mb (-0.68mb since build 52) > > Description of changes in this build: > * working camera! > * kernel exposes wakeup reasons to userspace (#9793) > * GSM driver really included this time (#9684) > * add OLPC CA certificate (#9624) > * add csound-python to build (#9583) > * booting from alternate install can be tested in this build > * remove Log and Terminal from default favorites view (#9796) Just testing Steve's latest OS10 for the XO-1 build; was wondering if Analyze is another (admin/tech related) activity that can be dropped from the default favourites view? Regards, --Gary > > Package changes since build 52: > > -csound-5.10.1-13.fc11.i586 > +csound-5.10.1-14.fc11.i586 > +csound-python-5.10.1-14.fc11.i586 > -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 > +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091204.0910.1.olpc.e81f432.i586 > -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091203.0040.1.olpc.95ebb6f.i586 > +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091204.0910.1.olpc.e81f432.i586 > -olpc-utils-1.0.12-1.fc11.i586 > +olpc-utils-1.0.13-1.fc11.i586 > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list From gary at garycmartin.com Fri Dec 11 21:15:59 2009 From: gary at garycmartin.com (Gary C Martin) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:15:59 +0000 Subject: Some testing notes for OS10 for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <200912111355.57004.smparrish@gmail.com> References: <200912111355.57004.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <6330CA5E-A6D4-444C-861F-60168086E2F6@garycmartin.com> Hi Steven, Testing on XO-1 CL1. On 11 Dec 2009, at 18:55, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > If you are going to try out OS10 for the XO-1 here are a few things that need > testing. > > Does it boot consistently into Sugar? Gnome? Yes, but only tested over a few reboot cycles for each. > Any strange lockups? If so what were you doing? - Trackpad and keyboard stop working after letting XO to go into sleep. Power button wakes machine, backlight on, interface redraws, but no keyboard or mouse. Used power button to cycle sleeping/waking several times but no change. 2 presses of power button to switch off and try again. - Manually putting to sleep with the power button, same result. Interestingly, when the machine is asleep, moving the mouse or pressing keys does make the power led light up, but once machine is awake mouse and keys are dead again. - Seemed to break after dcon freeze (you can usually see the screen briefly jump/glitch), wiggling the mouse right after the screen glitch but before the screen blanked still lost keyboard and mouse input (at least on two occasions). > Can you upgrade packages using "yum update" from the command line? - Yes, tested both an install of vim, then a general update. > Does sound work? - Yes, tested in TamTam, Speak, Pippy, Memorize, Record. > Can you suspend? Does it wake up? - Yes, but with loss of keyboard and mouse as noted above. > Please report any issues you have. - For the majority of Activities I checked (Speak, Turtle Art, Moon, Memorize, Pippy, Read, Calculate, Labyrinth, Chat, Record, anything with the default Activity toolbar name/share/keep/stop), the Activity toolbar content now a tiny bit longer so that the Stop button is being pushed (by only a few pixels) into an overflow drop down menu :-( Did the gtk theme or widgets get tweaked, font size looks about right. Oddly enough I'm sure I disable the "Share with" widget in my Moon and Labyrinth activity code (as they don't yet support sharing), but they are now both showing the "Share with" widget in the toolbar, hmmmm.... - Record Activity only showing an audio tab, so can't test video or photo taking ability. - Booting into Gnome does not recognise the XO battery and shows a "battery may be broken broken or very low charge" warning (I was originally running the XO from battery at about 50% charge remaining, but you get the same warning if on mains power). - Still seeing two network device icons in bottom of the Sugar frame. Regards, --Gary From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Dec 11 22:51:52 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:51:52 -0800 (PST) Subject: Some testing notes for OS10 for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <200912111355.57004.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <637781.92416.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Connect on WEP wifi. OK Yum update (updated to the newer kernel). OK In spite the alsactl complains during boot sound in/out (record, tam-tam, speak)is OK Suspends on lid but on resume the screen comes up but no keyboard or mouse. On timeouts, dims and sleeps but does not blank. Blanks on keyboard input. Wakes up on power button but no keyboard mouse again. (Un-)checking the power management in the control panel does not change things. Toolbar does not fit! The stop button does not show in many activities for example. Terminal has huge fonts (>2x) Typing quotes (?) in Write results in loosing cursor focus. Touchpad feels more jumpy than usual bat this can be subjective or incidental I had all these issues after the last yum update of the "unofficial os10" where it updated sugar/suagr-toolkit and unfortunately too many other packages to remember --- On Fri, 12/11/09, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > From: Steven M. Parrish > Subject: Some testing notes for OS10 for the XO-1 > To: "fedora-olpc-list" , "OLPC Devel" , "Sugar Development" , devel-announce at lists.laptop.org, testing at lists.laptop.org > Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 1:55 PM > If you are going to try out OS10 for > the XO-1 here are a few things that need > testing. > > Does it boot consistently into Sugar?? Gnome? > > Any strange lockups?? If so what were you doing? > > Can you upgrade packages using "yum update" from the > command line? > > Does sound work? > > Can you suspend?? Does it wake up? > > > Please report any issues you have. > > Steven > > > -- > ===================================================== > Steven M. Parrish > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 > A9A6 13C0 > http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ > irc.freenode.net: > Nickname: SMParrish > Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #fedora-edu, #sugar, > #packagekit > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > From mikus at bga.com Sat Dec 12 01:51:24 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:51:24 -0600 Subject: http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os58/ Message-ID: <4B22F71C.9000907@bga.com> Why no os58.zd ? I like to keep om hand an image I can install with 'fs-update'. Besides, 'olpc-update' gives the impression of taking longer. mikus From ed at laptop.org Sat Dec 12 01:43:09 2009 From: ed at laptop.org (Ed McNierney) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:43:09 -0500 Subject: http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os58/ In-Reply-To: <4B22F71C.9000907@bga.com> References: <4B22F71C.9000907@bga.com> Message-ID: Mikus - Chris is very good about emailing build announcements when they're ready. If there hasn't been an announcement, and you happen to discover a few files lying about in an HTML-accessible place, please don't expect them to be of any particular use. When OS 58 has been reasonably checked out and uploaded, there will be the usual email announcement. In the meantime, feel free to keep testing OS 57! Thanks. - Ed On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > Why no os58.zd ? > > I like to keep om hand an image I can install with 'fs-update'. > Besides, 'olpc-update' gives the impression of taking longer. > > mikus > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel at lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 12 03:16:27 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:16:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 58 Message-ID: <20091212031627.65D7AFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os58 Compressed image size: 700.51mb (+4.64mb since build 57) Description of changes in this build: * Boot partition increased from 31M to 62M (#9871) * Help activity v12 added, from Seth Woodworth * Remove gnome-power-manager (#9781) * Fix "camera LED on when not recording" (#9798) * Add Sugar translations for ad-hoc network support (#9852) * Fix association with WEP Shared Key in Sugar (#9618) Package changes since build 57: -DeviceKit-power-010-0.3.20090810git.fc11.i586 -gnome-power-manager-2.26.4-3.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091210.0210.1.olpc.b5dd718.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091211.1040.1.olpc.34cf14d.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091210.0210.1.olpc.b5dd718.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091211.1040.1.olpc.34cf14d.i586 -olpc-utils-1.0.13-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-utils-1.0.14-1.fc11.i586 -sugar-0.84.8-1.fc11.i586 +sugar-0.84.9-1.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-1.fc11.2.i586 +xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-1.fc11.3.i586 From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 12 03:14:24 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:14:24 -0500 Subject: http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os58/ In-Reply-To: (Ed McNierney's message of "Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:43:09 -0500") References: <4B22F71C.9000907@bga.com> Message-ID: Hi, > When OS 58 has been reasonably checked out and uploaded, there > will be the usual email announcement. In the meantime, feel free > to keep testing OS 57! Thanks, Ed. Yes, I intentionally deleted os58.zd and os58.img.gz in order to save folks other than myself from downloading it, flashing it and realizing that it failed to boot. Please don't download a build before it's announced. It would be extremely confusing to have to answer a bug report against os58 with "Which version of os58 do you have?". I've uploaded a working build and released os58 now. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From quozl at laptop.org Sat Dec 12 05:04:30 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:04:30 +1100 Subject: os57 - blocker - suspend prevents me from viewing screen [#9865] In-Reply-To: <4B2272DF.9050005@bga.com> References: <4B2272DF.9050005@bga.com> Message-ID: <20091212050430.GC10671@us.netrek.org> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:27:11AM -0600, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > XO-1.5 B2. This sounds like #9865. I agree. Please convince the laptop to do it again, and if it does, see if removing the battery while leaving the power supply attached does anything for the symptom. It did for me. After that, without changing configuration, and before the next suspend, gather data on the state of the system ... I suggest dmesg, /var/log content, and the output of "ohmd --verbose --no-daemon". If it doesn't suspend on idle after you've done that, then that also matches my one experience of the problem. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 12 23:00:40 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:00:40 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 59 Message-ID: <20091212230041.2C3E2FA8E3@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os59 Compressed image size: 700.81mb (+0.29mb since build 58) Description of changes in this build: * switch to data=ordered (#9455) * fix activation over net/USB/SD (#9396) * create /security on boot partition so that OFW has access to it Package changes since build 58: -dracut-modules-olpc-0.3.1-1.fc11.i586 +dracut-modules-olpc-0.3.2-1.fc11.i586 From cjb at laptop.org Sun Dec 13 22:01:38 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:01:38 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 60 Message-ID: <20091213220138.87FACFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os60 Compressed image size: 703.93mb (+3.12mb since build 59) Description of changes in this build: * New firmware Q3A23 * New release of manufacturing run-in tests Package changes since build 59: -bootfw-q3a20-1.unsigned.i386 +bootfw-q3a23-1.unsigned.i386 -md5deep-3.4-1.fc11.i586 -olpc-runin-tests-0.2-1.noarch +olpc-runin-tests-0.2-2.noarch +xterm-242-3.fc11.i586 From cjb at laptop.org Mon Dec 14 17:24:31 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:24:31 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 61 Message-ID: <20091214172432.2972AFA8C1@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os61 Compressed image size: 705.43mb (+1.50mb since build 60) Description of changes in this build: * add Q3A24 to build (#9889) * fix Sugar five-character nickname limit on ad-hoc networks (#9807) Package changes since build 60: -bootfw-q3a23-1.unsigned.i386 +bootfw-q3a24-1.unsigned.i386 +sugar-0.84.9-1.fc11.1.i586 -sugar-0.84.9-1.fc11.i586 From walter.bender at gmail.com Mon Dec 14 23:42:27 2009 From: walter.bender at gmail.com (Walter Bender) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:42:27 +0800 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 61 In-Reply-To: References: <20091214172432.2972AFA8C1@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: Chris has been using 0.84 in his builds. -walter On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 >> http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os61 >> >> Compressed image size: 705.43mb (+1.50mb since build 60) >> >> Description of changes in this build: >> ?* add Q3A24 to build (#9889) >> ?* fix Sugar five-character nickname limit on ad-hoc networks (#9807) >> >> Package changes since build 60: >> >> -bootfw-q3a23-1.unsigned.i386 >> +bootfw-q3a24-1.unsigned.i386 >> +sugar-0.84.9-1.fc11.1.i586 >> -sugar-0.84.9-1.fc11.i586 > > Maybe I missed this in the earlier XO-1.5 builds but upon installing build > 61 I was surprised to see "Restart" again in the main hover menu. Wasn't it > decided awhile ago that removing that option from that menu was a good idea? > (IIRC #1206 dealt with that very topic and it was solved in Sugar 0.86 - > seems like a reasonably small change to consider for the final XO-1.5 builds > as well) > Cheers, > Christoph > -- > Christoph Derndorfer > co-editor, olpcnews > url: www.olpcnews.com > e-mail: christoph at olpcnews.com > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel at lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org From eric at christensenplace.us Mon Dec 14 23:46:51 2009 From: eric at christensenplace.us (Eric Christensen) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:46:51 -0500 Subject: Docs in Sugar Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In Gnome it's Yelp. In KDE it's khelpcenter. What does Sugar use to display help, and other, documentation? - --Eric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.10) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLJs5rAAoJEDbiLlqcYamxhLsQALxPxgbS1AJV3kHteVIN1Wii 0CsQ4vcacXjb+Cj86vsih1WDwBsJj3N7Ysq7fWUXo2l3WAdnCM3FzNZr4X/tMY70 KNjVS3XNwpaCu9qRWHZpIvS/eGCsukYna4DbUIVFwwd1RpRkjUweEq4fUY9L1Kje JnDOH1L1WxC7eAuNJHABIaOy7QD00tO5KHEbFeJ82M8fHnELaY5Y73oYSZR00lZV nB7F3/WkJTflByj5F3w/LJTnxPQl1LGyh0gJt2B/X3wUXGi+79B92ClN6qdRQwNm L6S2G7l2owqbU/aaCoEuiVaiXycYDnBkdm42gjIUJYaV4SiPhE2KvlDq2QTGWFBQ 9H+lT/kF93urtUeBG0Ko6SG4qvs2V9+p0hvC4HF+qT21aokwyOzNk3zTxivpdrbW w81ncsupHj2AMiZdhvsGglW7jMVwkdayy8EiNBMQAZof0yAJU79h1szXOJqFT/DD 5BfyyaBPJbPDEC5v0P7E6B1ahNXjRFW25TlvCdLyxRrzEDoF2iEHeGh8jA+U/ipH BReXmZmCMYv296GFffKMFox9qCpMuzpTkf2Q4SknfFvXfdYzOPzjP8ERCCly2UyW Ulrqozykx78EQLc7kC6IEN4qWG6Cx/cYjQTJvQ3ur9OqqYTBiI45wQbskDWk+rBV UoYWnViP31nNa9yz9Ptp =wHq2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From cjb at laptop.org Mon Dec 14 23:50:01 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:50:01 -0500 Subject: Docs in Sugar In-Reply-To: (Eric Christensen's message of "Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:46:51 -0500") References: Message-ID: Hi, > In Gnome it's Yelp. In KDE it's khelpcenter. What does Sugar > use to display help, and other, documentation? There's a Help activity, usually bundled by default, which brings up an offline version of http://laptop.org/manual/. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From eric at christensenplace.us Mon Dec 14 23:58:11 2009 From: eric at christensenplace.us (Eric Christensen) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:58:11 -0500 Subject: Docs in Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 18:50, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > > In Gnome it's Yelp. In KDE it's khelpcenter. What does Sugar > > use to display help, and other, documentation? > > There's a Help activity, usually bundled by default, which brings up > an offline version of http://laptop.org/manual/. > > - Chris. > -- > Chris Ball > One Laptop Per Child > Hi Chris, Do you know what software drives that offline manual? Is it just a browser or something more specialized like Yelp? The Fedora Documentation Project is working on making sure our documentation is accessible to everyone regardless of the desktop. I'm not as familiar with Sugar and didn't know if our current packages work on Sugar or if we need to work in a different format or what. Thanks, Eric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.10) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLJtETAAoJEDbiLlqcYamxRSIP/0knHsg/+qPThl02zsC1ybul B4qHnQKeQO0fBHLB/bFLjcngDvqdqSYeN5QqWvjc7NoUUVIcypIuEmITUCRmJC5T 7J0KIthhRgrM5mom3tU2KCSknmZXI+JkHaapOREk+mPfIhMJSmMptnGFsPa0ktKR +uq7ngtctTB5B3bKo8APCcXjE190M+DBW1HDybdQQHnX0xCgU5SwF43rqoAonngF xEls4mxJ+WsEwyEcetA8+jMx9e877ZzRLZicSeloQloZKciJ7Spy75+GrnBwnJje 3TKD9JXTjC5CaznHbRw0cq/raNeGjcNBK7EjS6bKZ9qP8h48khqZwHhoh1IE0sPG lyfnFXbUkl9o3PbQxd201/Ofeu/4k657gRU/Ptgydrz3i0d0OYZIKVYyta2z8qFe 4PjCDqxah1Kmydy0dmhe9eYL7yzMQlC7WIB4k1GTfJjt4Dj7F7BEwE3Beia+r/3e BLHCsVPhFJxnfEJIPVF3/o5NFGrrc9zWW9PvfTP61rqBNseXJOmpjHbKYOBVVcCM V+qYu89SCvGlz9zOujV2myybvS1sWJMR4rDjLR4B10/YwpnqnWTE7awX4kw+6KxK +5LfnvIj/U2Iqs0rLRJWr5KaQ8M3pgGs4RNqqT1vfpjCp2muJsgMmXhVAHjTSzbe YvEai9z8ZMG4T2f9zaht =HiW3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From quozl at laptop.org Tue Dec 15 00:11:20 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:11:20 +1100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 61 In-Reply-To: References: <20091214172432.2972AFA8C1@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <20091215001120.GN10390@us.netrek.org> I removed Restart, but it is in 0.86 and onwards. On the OLPC builds we're trying to carry as little change ourselves from 0.84, but a backport of the patch might be worth considering for a later 0.84 update release. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From cjb at laptop.org Tue Dec 15 00:54:05 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:54:05 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 62 Message-ID: <20091215005406.0818CFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os62 Compressed image size: 702.14mb (-3.28mb since build 61) Description of changes in this build: * change release version from "11.0" to "10.1", for consistent "year.release" naming scheme with previous releases. (#9806) (Not sure why this build lost 3MB compared to the last one without any package changes -- we should diff the tarball to find out.) From dirakx at gmail.com Tue Dec 15 03:25:42 2009 From: dirakx at gmail.com (Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:25:42 -0500 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 62 In-Reply-To: <20091215005406.0818CFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> References: <20091215005406.0818CFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os62 > > Compressed image size: 702.14mb (-3.28mb since build 61) > > Description of changes in this build: > ?* change release version from "11.0" to "10.1", for consistent > ? "year.release" naming scheme with previous releases. ?(#9806) just to add: Version naming scheme is at /etc/olpc-release > (Not sure why this build lost 3MB compared to the last one without > any package changes -- we should diff the tarball to find out.) > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > From cjb at laptop.org Wed Dec 16 05:36:21 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:36:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 63 Message-ID: <20091216053621.EFBA94375@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os63 Compressed image size: 702.48mb (+0.34mb since build 62) Description of changes in this build: * Refuse to load the camera driver if serial port is enabled (#9832) * Change OHM timeout before sleep from 5 mins to 10 mins (#9898) * Make the shortest rtcwake possible be 5 seconds, and do not set an rtcwake if timeouts.ini:timeouts.timer_rtcwake is set to 0 (#9900) Package changes since build 62: -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091211.1040.1.olpc.34cf14d.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091215.1440.1.olpc.9815d58.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091211.1040.1.olpc.34cf14d.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091215.1440.1.olpc.9815d58.i586 -ohm-0.1.1-9.38.20091211git.fc11.i586 +ohm-0.1.1-9.39.20091215git.fc11.i586 From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Wed Dec 16 19:12:17 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:12:17 +0100 Subject: Offer of help with Sugar and related packages Message-ID: <46a038f90912161112r6e5b6a1bre1e9685bef3ce659@mail.gmail.com> Sorry about the crosspost -- I think the best is to keep this thread going on fedora-olpc-list and to cc Guillermo Gomez ('gomix'). Note! IIRC, fedora-olpc-list has broken reply-to behaviour so to keep him cc'd takes extra effort (if you don't cc him explicitly, he'll get dropped). Guillermo is offering to help with Fedora packaging efforts related to Sugar & OLPC. He is asking that we put together a list of things that need help -- I've seen some such lists in the early days of this mailing list but I don't know if there is one now. I will start the conversation suggesting - (mentioned by Tomeu) Existing maintainers are overstretched -- review existing rpms in Fedora rawhide for freshness, offer to co-maintain or take over where it makes sense. Conssider packaging updates. - Scan bugzilla for bugs against sugar-* - Gnash packaging (Tomeu) It's not clear to me what Guillermo's plans are -- whether he'll work on it personally, has a team working on this, plans to have a team one day... in any case, Guillermo, I think it is an important first step to subscribe to fedora-olpc-list. This list is where things are being coordinated -- not being here you / your team won't be "in the know" with the things you need to know. It's pretty moderate traffic, nothing like lkml or fedora-devel... :-) cheers, m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Wed Dec 16 19:54:29 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:54:29 +0100 Subject: dracut(?) problem In-Reply-To: <944298.12726.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <46a038f90912090445h150d320co33b075c142c72342@mail.gmail.com> <944298.12726.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <46a038f90912161154y602fdaa2p8b601370864a780e@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > No I didn't. I guess the "olpc-2.6.31" is the branch of interest at the time. Correct?? Bingo! I think olpc-2.6.30 is your friend -- but check whatever the latest builds have. > Does your replay also means that "make xo_1-kernel-rpm" will _not_ work with kernel src.rpm and/or that "normal" 2.6.31 kernel patches should work on the olpc-2.6.31 git branch? I dunno... m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From pgf at laptop.org Wed Dec 16 22:39:17 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:39:17 -0500 Subject: Offer of help with Sugar and related packages In-Reply-To: <46a038f90912161112r6e5b6a1bre1e9685bef3ce659@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20091216_141610_905786_5F4231D6) References: <46a038f90912161112r6e5b6a1bre1e9685bef3ce659@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20091216_141610_905786_5F4231D6) Message-ID: <31861.1261003157@foxharp.boston.ma.us> martin wrote: > Sorry about the crosspost -- I think the best is to keep this thread > going on fedora-olpc-list and to cc Guillermo Gomez ('gomix'). Note! > IIRC, fedora-olpc-list has broken reply-to behaviour so to keep him > cc'd takes extra effort (if you don't cc him explicitly, he'll get > dropped). > > Guillermo is offering to help with Fedora packaging efforts related to > Sugar & OLPC. He is asking that we put together a list of things that > need help -- I've seen some such lists in the early days of this > mailing list but I don't know if there is one now. > > I will start the conversation suggesting > > - (mentioned by Tomeu) Existing maintainers are overstretched -- > review existing rpms in Fedora rawhide for freshness, offer to > co-maintain or take over where it makes sense. Conssider packaging > updates. > > - Scan bugzilla for bugs against sugar-* > > - Gnash packaging (Tomeu) there's a long-standing issue that we'd like an add-on rpm of "extra" kernel modules, for things like usb devices, bluetooth, etc. related bugs are #9684, #7326, #8408. this applies to both XO-1 and 1.5. paul > > It's not clear to me what Guillermo's plans are -- whether he'll work > on it personally, has a team working on this, plans to have a team one > day... in any case, Guillermo, I think it is an important first step > to subscribe to fedora-olpc-list. This list is where things are being > coordinated -- not being here you / your team won't be "in the know" > with the things you need to know. It's pretty moderate traffic, > nothing like lkml or fedora-devel... :-) > =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Thu Dec 17 11:06:19 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:06:19 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Offer of help with Sugar and related packages In-Reply-To: <4B2A0D2A.6070707@gmail.com> References: <46a038f90912161112r6e5b6a1bre1e9685bef3ce659@mail.gmail.com> <31861.1261003157@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <46a038f90912161515u3578a39bh504a94afdf5ecd3@mail.gmail.com> <4B2A0D2A.6070707@gmail.com> Message-ID: <46a038f90912170306q55ee3f43w885cf1f0c86037de@mail.gmail.com> Guillermo' s response. Please _make sure you CC Guillermo_ -- I am a lousy message forwarder. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Guillermo G?mez Date: 2009/12/17 Subject: Re: Fwd: Offer of help with Sugar and related packages To: Martin Langhoff El 16/12/09 18:45, Martin Langhoff escribi?: Thanks Martin and here goes some details: http://rpmdev.proyectofedora.org is a new regional project (LATAM) based on the idea to build a team, a latam team to package and develop new applications (or unmaintained one, orphans, etc) cooperating in our native language (spanish). Since its a new project, the team is just building up from ground zero. This thread started because we needed candidates to package and some people in Peru started to think that im personally interested, not the case, but, someone could be interested in the team. http://rpmdev.proyectofedora.org/wiki/rpmfed/Lista_de_aplicaciones_candidatas_a_ser_empaquetadas lists candidates for our members to choose. And plis excuse me , im will not suscribe another list ;) We just need the material or someone interested in our team to do so (ill make sure that our team knows that there are needs in olpc) brgds Guillermo > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Paul Fox > Date: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:39 PM > Subject: Re: Offer of help with Sugar and related packages > To: fedora-olpc-list > > > martin wrote: > ?> ?Sorry about the crosspost -- I think the best is to keep this thread > ?> ?going on fedora-olpc-list and to cc Guillermo Gomez ('gomix'). ?Note! > ?> ?IIRC, fedora-olpc-list has broken reply-to behaviour so to keep him > ?> ?cc'd takes extra effort (if you don't cc him explicitly, he'll get > ?> ?dropped). > ?> > ?> ?Guillermo is offering to help with Fedora packaging efforts related to > ?> ?Sugar& ?OLPC. He is asking that we put together a list of things that > ?> ?need help -- I've seen some such lists in the early days of this > ?> ?mailing list but I don't know if there is one now. > ?> > ?> ?I will start the conversation suggesting > ?> > ?> ? ?- (mentioned by Tomeu) Existing maintainers are overstretched -- > ?> ?review existing rpms in Fedora rawhide for freshness, offer to > ?> ?co-maintain or take over where it makes sense. Conssider packaging > ?> ?updates. > ?> > ?> ? ?- Scan bugzilla for bugs against sugar-* > ?> > ?> ? ?- Gnash packaging (Tomeu) > > there's a long-standing issue that we'd like an add-on rpm of > "extra" kernel modules, for things like usb devices, bluetooth, > etc. ?related bugs are #9684, #7326, #8408. ?this applies to both > XO-1 and 1.5. > > paul > > ?> > ?> ?It's not clear to me what Guillermo's plans are -- ?whether he'll work > ?> ?on it personally, has a team working on this, plans to have a team one > ?> ?day... in any case, Guillermo, I think it is an important first step > ?> ?to subscribe to fedora-olpc-list. This list is where things are being > ?> ?coordinated -- not being here you / your team won't be "in the know" > ?> ?with the things you need to know. It's pretty moderate traffic, > ?> ?nothing like lkml or fedora-devel... :-) > ?> > > =--------------------- > ?paul fox, pgf at laptop.org > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > > > -- ------------------------ http://www.neotechgw.com http://gomix.fedora-ve.org -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From dsd at laptop.org Thu Dec 17 18:16:05 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:16:05 +0000 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 62 In-Reply-To: <20091215005406.0818CFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> References: <20091215005406.0818CFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <1261073765.9963.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:54 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > (Not sure why this build lost 3MB compared to the last one without > any package changes -- we should diff the tarball to find out.) Uncompressed, os61.tree.tar has identical size to os62.tree.tar So this is just a LZMA compression thing, no actual increase in size. Daniel From crodas at paraguayeduca.org Thu Dec 17 19:38:03 2009 From: crodas at paraguayeduca.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar?= D. Rodas) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:38:03 -0300 Subject: Little issue with Midore Message-ID: <1261078683.6665.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hello All, In the FC-11, The Midore Browser comes as the default browser. It looks good so far, but it has a little bug, well it is not a proper bug, the font-size is too big displaying messages. As I said before, it is not a proper bug, and I fixed it by setting the default font size to 6px, in the ~/.config/midori/config, and it looks better. Is there a way to set this configuration by default?, I think it could be done in the RPM itself, in a %post stage. I might be wrong. If I'm not wrong, who is takes care of Midore (or perhaps Gnome) packaging? Even though Sugar is our target desktop we want everything to (sort of) work if some kid chooses to try out Gnome. Best regards From cjb at laptop.org Thu Dec 17 20:10:26 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:10:26 -0500 (EST) Subject: F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 3 Message-ID: <20091217201027.14C2BFA8C1@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os64 Compressed image size: 700.19mb (-2.29mb since build 63) This is the third release candidate (RC3) for the XO-1.5 F11 release! We expect this build to become the first release build (10.1.0) for the 1.5 machines after it passes final testing. B2 compatibility note: * If you have a B2 without hardware mods, you must disable suspend using Control Panel->Power->Automatic power management, else your wireless device will disconnect on suspend and not come back until the next reboot. Changes from previous build os63: * Add Q3A25 firmware * Fix collaboration on ad-hoc networks (#9669) * Remove GNOME Cheese app, which isn't working with our camera (#9841) Package changes since build 63: -bootfw-q3a24-1.unsigned.i386 +bootfw-q3a25-1.unsigned.i386 -cheese-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 From quozl at laptop.org Thu Dec 17 21:16:00 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:16:00 +1100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 62 In-Reply-To: <1261073765.9963.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20091215005406.0818CFA8E3@dev.laptop.org> <1261073765.9963.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20091217211600.GU8888@us.netrek.org> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 06:16:05PM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:54 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > > (Not sure why this build lost 3MB compared to the last one without > > any package changes -- we should diff the tarball to find out.) > > Uncompressed, os61.tree.tar has identical size to os62.tree.tar > So this is just a LZMA compression thing, no actual increase in size. I also looked into it briefly ... by comparing only the file names, and found the ordering of the files is changed, I had to sort the tar list. Changing the order of the bytes certainly changes the resulting compressed stream, and 3Mb seems not unreasonable over that total length. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From bochecha at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 18 08:54:57 2009 From: bochecha at fedoraproject.org (Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:54:57 +0100 Subject: Little issue with Midore In-Reply-To: <1261078683.6665.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1261078683.6665.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <2d319b780912180054j670a32d3ua574e06abdd6419a@mail.gmail.com> Hi, On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 20:38, C?sar D. Rodas wrote: > Hello All, > > In the FC-11, The Midore Browser comes as the default browser. It looks > good so far, but it has a little bug, well it is not a proper bug, the > font-size is too big displaying messages. > > As I said before, it is not a proper bug, and I fixed it by setting the > default font size to 6px, in the ~/.config/midori/config, and it looks > better. Is there a way to set this configuration by default?, I think it > could be done in the RPM itself, in a %post stage. Not if this is a per user only setting. Isn't there a system-wide configuration file ? If so, this file could be modified in the RPM. Also, beware that the problem might not appear on a different screen than th XO's. So by fixing this bug for the XO screen, you might be introducing it (i.e. too small fonts) for other screens. > who is takes care of Midore (or perhaps Gnome) packaging? You can find that out using the Fedora PackageDB: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/midori In our case, Peter Gordon is the Midori maintainer. If you want to report this issue, bugzilla would be the place to go. ---------- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Fri Dec 18 10:14:09 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:14:09 +0100 Subject: Little issue with Midore In-Reply-To: <2d319b780912180054j670a32d3ua574e06abdd6419a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1261078683.6665.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <2d319b780912180054j670a32d3ua574e06abdd6419a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <46a038f90912180214k7331cc78xf93a4f490fba7ce5@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: >> As I said before, it is not a proper bug, and I fixed it by setting the >> default font size to 6px, in the ~/.config/midori/config, and it looks >> better. Is there a way to set this configuration by default?, I think it >> could be done in the RPM itself, in a %post stage. It is a natural reaction to our screen being a bit special. On earlier OSs we've scaled up the 'zoom' for the xulrunner (gecko) engine; effectively scaling the whole page to 134%. Background - the whole page, and the topic I link to -- here http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Display#UI_design_and_physical_geometry > Also, beware that the problem might not appear on a different screen > than th XO's. So by fixing this bug for the XO screen, you might be > introducing it (i.e. too small fonts) for other screens. I think it'd be good to add it in the kickstart that builds the image. > If you want to report this issue, bugzilla would be the place to go. Don't think this is an upstream issue, unless you also find it on a non-xo. m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From crodas at paraguayeduca.org Fri Dec 18 13:36:54 2009 From: crodas at paraguayeduca.org (crodas) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:36:54 -0300 Subject: Little issue with Midore In-Reply-To: <1261078683.6665.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1261078683.6665.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <70c918673b469ff1c50f0d2a69356171@paraguayeduca.org> Hello, On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:38:03 -0300, C?sar "D. Rodas" wrote: > Hello All, > > In the FC-11, The Midore Browser comes as the default browser. It looks > good so far, but it has a little bug, well it is not a proper bug, the > font-size is too big displaying messages. s/Midore/Midori/g :-) When I said "messages" before, I meant "error messages". In order to reproduce it, just open a non valid URL. > > As I said before, it is not a proper bug, and I fixed it by setting the > default font size to 6px, in the ~/.config/midori/config, and it looks > better. Is there a way to set this configuration by default?, I think it > could be done in the RPM itself, in a %post stage. I might be wrong. If > I'm not wrong, who is takes care of Midore (or perhaps Gnome) packaging? > > Even though Sugar is our target desktop we want everything to (sort of) > work if some kid chooses to try out Gnome. > > > Best regards > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel at lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel Regards, From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Fri Dec 18 20:03:59 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:03:59 +0100 Subject: Little issue with Midore In-Reply-To: <70c918673b469ff1c50f0d2a69356171@paraguayeduca.org> References: <1261078683.6665.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <70c918673b469ff1c50f0d2a69356171@paraguayeduca.org> Message-ID: <46a038f90912181203j2b176f80n4d5866a99cda30da@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:36 PM, crodas wrote: > When I said "messages" before, I meant "error messages". In order to > reproduce it, just open a non valid URL. Oh! Does the same happen with other error messages from other apps? If so, we might need to bump gnome's font sizes. If not, then perhaps the bug is that Midori isn't using Gnome's configured font sizes ;-) cheers, m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From cjb at laptop.org Sat Dec 19 06:48:30 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:48:30 -0500 Subject: Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.0 final release! Message-ID: Hi, I'm very pleased to announce build os64 as the final 10.1.0 release build for XO-1.5 laptops. Here are its release notes: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.0 Instructions for installing the release on an XO-1.5 can be found at: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.0#Installation Many thanks to everyone who contributed to this release! - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From sverma at sfsu.edu Sat Dec 19 07:47:30 2009 From: sverma at sfsu.edu (Sameer Verma) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:47:30 -0800 Subject: Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.0 final release! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5fb387c70912182347s45e54b56off702a72989dd036@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very pleased to announce build os64 as the final 10.1.0 release > build for XO-1.5 laptops. Here are its release notes: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.0 > > Instructions for installing the release on an XO-1.5 can be found at: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.0#Installation > > Many thanks to everyone who contributed to this release! > > - Chris. > -- > Chris Ball > One Laptop Per Child > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > Hearty congratulations!!! Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Information Systems Director, Center for Business Solutions San Francisco State University http://verma.sfsu.edu/ http://cbs.sfsu.edu/ http://is.sfsu.edu/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomeu at sugarlabs.org Sat Dec 19 12:04:00 2009 From: tomeu at sugarlabs.org (Tomeu Vizoso) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:04:00 +0000 Subject: Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.0 final release! In-Reply-To: <5fb387c70912182347s45e54b56off702a72989dd036@mail.gmail.com> References: <5fb387c70912182347s45e54b56off702a72989dd036@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <242851610912190404g3f5b144kf8f1292ce491d2f5@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:47, Sameer Verma wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm very pleased to announce build os64 as the final 10.1.0 release >> build for XO-1.5 laptops. ?Here are its release notes: >> >> ? http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.0 >> >> Instructions for installing the release on an XO-1.5 can be found at: >> >> ? http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.0#Installation >> >> Many thanks to everyone who contributed to this release! >> >> - Chris. >> -- >> Chris Ball ? >> One Laptop Per Child >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-olpc-list mailing list >> Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > > > Hearty congratulations!!! Congratulations not only on the result but also on the process, which, at least from where I sit, has been seen as disciplined, realist and without drama. Cheers, Tomeu > Sameer > -- > Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. > Associate Professor, Information Systems > Director, Center for Business Solutions > San Francisco State University > http://verma.sfsu.edu/ > http://cbs.sfsu.edu/ > http://is.sfsu.edu/ > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > -- ?Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.? - David Farning From tomeu at sugarlabs.org Sun Dec 20 15:28:53 2009 From: tomeu at sugarlabs.org (Tomeu Vizoso) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:28:53 +0000 Subject: powerd or ohm? Message-ID: <242851610912200728r77765282xf874851c3736067a@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I think f11 for the XO 1.5 uses ohmd but from a recent message from Paul I think the images for the XO-1 are configured to use powerd or at least doesn't start ohmd by default. Steve, is there any plan on this? Thanks, Tomeu -- ?Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.? - David Farning From mikus at bga.com Sun Dec 20 22:48:56 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:48:56 -0600 Subject: XO-1.5 video rendering not always smooth Message-ID: <4B2EA9D8.2090901@bga.com> In the new snow-1.xo Activity, the falling "white spots" are noticeably jerkier in os64 (XO-1.5) than in os10 (XO-1). Also, on os64 the (software?) cursor sometimes "flickers" annoyingly. It is always noticeable in the google-chrome browser (on Sugar), and for instance in the new version of the cartoonbuilder-7.xo Activity. In contrast, the (hardware?) cursor in the Opera browser operates smoothly in os64 (on Sugar). mikus From dsd at laptop.org Sun Dec 20 23:09:46 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:09:46 +0000 Subject: XO-1.5 video rendering not always smooth In-Reply-To: <4B2EA9D8.2090901@bga.com> References: <4B2EA9D8.2090901@bga.com> Message-ID: <818423da0912201509t488d3d23j687b4e4be5b14996@mail.gmail.com> 2009/12/20 Mikus Grinbergs : > In the new snow-1.xo Activity, the falling "white spots" are noticeably > jerkier in os64 (XO-1.5) than in os10 (XO-1). > > Also, on os64 the (software?) cursor sometimes "flickers" annoyingly. > It is always noticeable in the google-chrome browser (on Sugar), and for > instance in the new version of the cartoonbuilder-7.xo Activity. ?In > contrast, the (hardware?) cursor in the Opera browser operates smoothly > in os64 (on Sugar). Thanks for the report. The support for the (brand new) video hardware found in the XO-1.5 is still in teething stages -- this is why the performance is bad. We've got the appropriate tickets open but it will take us some time to get there. Daniel From mikus at bga.com Mon Dec 21 02:27:39 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:27:39 -0600 Subject: XO-1.5 video rendering not always smooth Message-ID: <4B2EDD1B.1070901@bga.com> > The support for the (brand new) video hardware > found in the XO-1.5 is still in teething stages -- this is why the > performance is bad. We've got the appropriate tickets open but it will > take us some time to get there. I searched, but did not find tickets specifically addressing "poor motion" nor "cursor flicker" on XO-1.5. Opened #9921 to make sure. mikus From smparrish at gmail.com Tue Dec 22 19:13:59 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:13:59 -0500 Subject: powerd or ohm? In-Reply-To: <242851610912200728r77765282xf874851c3736067a@mail.gmail.com> References: <242851610912200728r77765282xf874851c3736067a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200912221413.59602.smparrish@gmail.com> On Sunday 20 December 2009 10:28:53 Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > I think f11 for the XO 1.5 uses ohmd but from a recent message from > Paul I think the images for the XO-1 are configured to use powerd or > at least doesn't start ohmd by default. > > Steve, is there any plan on this? > > Thanks, > > Tomeu > The next release will have ohm by default Should be out early next week. Steven -- ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: Nickname: SMParrish Channels: #fedora-kde, #fedora-olpc, #fedora-edu, #sugar, #packagekit From sebastian at when.com Wed Dec 23 23:56:34 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:56:34 +0100 Subject: Sugar 0.87.2 coming to Rawhide... Message-ID: <4B32AE32.6080708@when.com> ...FYI. Watch out for more packaging related stuff soon. --Sebastian From sebastian at when.com Mon Dec 28 21:06:48 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:06:48 +0100 Subject: Weekly Fedora Sugar Meetings Message-ID: <4B391DE8.7020207@when.com> Hi all, you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true. What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all kinds of crazy-awesome activities and other stuff for Fedora - which will get a Sugar environment with even more and better apps on its turn. So. Let's get this party started. I'm suggesting weekly meetings starting this Thursday, at 1500 UTC, 1000 EST [1]. Who else is in for this? Drop a note here! For those who're interested in getting started with contributing to Sugar, for example by packaging activities, there will be a Fedora Classroom session on January 6 (1500 UTC) in IRC & Gobby [2]. --Sebastian [1] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12&day=31&year=2009&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom From tomeu at sugarlabs.org Tue Dec 29 11:23:08 2009 From: tomeu at sugarlabs.org (Tomeu Vizoso) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:23:08 +0100 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Weekly Fedora Sugar Meetings In-Reply-To: <4B391DE8.7020207@when.com> References: <4B391DE8.7020207@when.com> Message-ID: <242851610912290323p1e35a2e9jb9145b735994c89@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 22:06, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi all, > > you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora > packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true. > > What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all > kinds of crazy-awesome activities and other stuff for Fedora - which > will get a Sugar environment with even more and better apps on its turn. > > So. Let's get this party started. I'm suggesting weekly meetings > starting this Thursday, at 1500 UTC, 1000 EST [1]. > > ? ?Who else is in for this? Drop a note here! Great idea, will try to attend regularly. Regards, Tomeu > For those who're interested in getting started with contributing to > Sugar, for example by packaging activities, there will be a Fedora > Classroom session on January 6 (1500 UTC) in IRC & Gobby [2]. > > --Sebastian > > [1] > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12&day=31&year=2009&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- ?Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.? - David Farning From walter.bender at gmail.com Tue Dec 29 12:48:01 2009 From: walter.bender at gmail.com (Walter Bender) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Weekly Fedora Sugar Meetings In-Reply-To: <4B391DE8.7020207@when.com> References: <4B391DE8.7020207@when.com> Message-ID: What channel? #fedora-edu? #sugar-meeting? -walter On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi all, > > you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora > packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true. > > What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all > kinds of crazy-awesome activities and other stuff for Fedora - which > will get a Sugar environment with even more and better apps on its turn. > > So. Let's get this party started. I'm suggesting weekly meetings > starting this Thursday, at 1500 UTC, 1000 EST [1]. > > ? ?Who else is in for this? Drop a note here! > > For those who're interested in getting started with contributing to > Sugar, for example by packaging activities, there will be a Fedora > Classroom session on January 6 (1500 UTC) in IRC & Gobby [2]. > > --Sebastian > > [1] > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12&day=31&year=2009&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org From tomeu at sugarlabs.org Tue Dec 29 17:49:31 2009 From: tomeu at sugarlabs.org (Tomeu Vizoso) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:49:31 +0100 Subject: packaging accessibility tools Message-ID: <242851610912290949o59a93b45x8da91794b087fc35@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Uruguay is working on adding some accessibility features to Sugar and they are using some stuff that, though old, is not properly packaged in any distro I know of: http://slappy.cs.uiuc.edu/fall98/Linux/download.html Do we have any volunteers to tackle packaging in their distro of choice? This seems like a task with specially high karma points. Thanks, Tomeu -- ?Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.? - David Farning From tomeu at sugarlabs.org Tue Dec 29 18:49:30 2009 From: tomeu at sugarlabs.org (Tomeu Vizoso) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:49:30 +0100 Subject: [Debian-olpc-devel] packaging accessibility tools In-Reply-To: <20091229183726.GE30112@twin.sascha.silbe.org> References: <242851610912290949o59a93b45x8da91794b087fc35@mail.gmail.com> <20091229183726.GE30112@twin.sascha.silbe.org> Message-ID: <242851610912291049o7a971458q44eb1834b4bef94@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 19:37, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> http://slappy.cs.uiuc.edu/fall98/Linux/download.html > > xkbset is an alternative CLI (for the AccessX interface) and already > packaged at least for Debian. Have they considered using that one instead? > I've given the package you mentioned above a quick look and it's Makefile > looks horrible from a distro maintainers POV. Besides it doesn't even > compile anymore, i.e. needs to get patched first. Hi Esteban, have you considered using xkbset instead? Thanks, Tomeu > CU Sascha > > -- > http://sascha.silbe.org/ > http://www.infra-silbe.de/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLOkxjAAoJELpz82VMF3DaRlIH/jiqA9qKkOeMwhGLIdu6nIiW > EDr7r0XwPqxs8Vt5UERh8ylPareFMQWwh+d+6doWl9lH4KgUiOHko0yQgzFJKAgK > 1BT9/99PGksvg7aJm2nBjBARoOCg96ZFTVgXx1kPjU3+HUHUULa0amrVRVoHR8kK > Eq7JsQOWSiGu6O8crtCFETbsSkgL/8fF7J97gjhN4a5TndPI4aiOA1QM0ZSTwUse > tL27Ib7w72LxraskmW1pTjeAp9lvWffMRwHTwFNmZOWngmeSZPzzkrGyruwOLVow > KkZuYm46Q/V8GkoL2NV2UMJu77BSSFeFE0UcxxQ6Ne29iOSdv8Br/SXS0thvN4s= > =aBSD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- ?Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.? - David Farning From sebastian at when.com Wed Dec 30 12:10:58 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:10:58 +0100 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Weekly Fedora Sugar Meetings In-Reply-To: References: <4B391DE8.7020207@when.com> Message-ID: <4B3B4352.6020205@when.com> Walter Bender wrote: > What channel? #fedora-edu? #sugar-meeting? Oh, right! I'd say let's just go for #fedora-olpc for now... See you there! --Sebastian > -walter > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora >> packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true. >> >> What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all >> kinds of crazy-awesome activities and other stuff for Fedora - which >> will get a Sugar environment with even more and better apps on its turn. >> >> So. Let's get this party started. I'm suggesting weekly meetings >> starting this Thursday, at 1500 UTC, 1000 EST [1]. >> >> Who else is in for this? Drop a note here! >> >> For those who're interested in getting started with contributing to >> Sugar, for example by packaging activities, there will be a Fedora >> Classroom session on January 6 (1500 UTC) in IRC& Gobby [2]. >> >> --Sebastian >> >> [1] >> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12&day=31&year=2009&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 >> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Wed Dec 30 17:02:37 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:02:37 +0000 Subject: xulrunner bug with patch - stuck in bugzilla? Message-ID: <46a038f90912300902h3f9b4859y91d782242b3f4f7f@mail.gmail.com> We have a UI regression due to xulrunner changes. Tomeu has done the hard work of finding the right patch to backport, but we need some help on the Fedora side :-) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524377 This affects us here - http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/851 For example - dev.sugarlabs.org and dev.laptop.org are very confusing to use without the missing spinner... cheers, m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From sebastian at when.com Thu Dec 31 16:30:28 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:30:28 +0100 Subject: Fedora Sugar Meeting Minutes 31/12/2009 Message-ID: <4B3CD1A4.60808@when.com> This is it. First meeting after some time, quite some folks joined. Thanks to all those who dropped by! Here are the minutes and logs: http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.minutes.20091231_1013.html http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.log.20091231_1013.html Next date is the Sugar Packaging Session on Jan 6, 1500 UTC [1] - if you're interested in learning how to package, join us! --Sebastian [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom#Upcoming_Classes From cjb at laptop.org Thu Dec 31 19:48:08 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:48:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 102 Message-ID: <20091231194808.5AD004375@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os102 Compressed image size: 702.15mb (-4.88mb since build 64) Description of changes in this build: This is the first build in a new release stream, 10.2.0. It is still based on Fedora 11, but has switched to a new build system, which is available at: git://dev.laptop.org/projects/olpc-os-builder/ The build was created with "python osbuilder.py examples/f11-xo1.5.ini". Change control for 10.2.0 is lifted; you can add RPMs to the build via dev:~/public_rpms/f11{,-xo1.5} as before. Changes from 10.1.0 release build os64: * Non-workaround fix for stop button pushed off the toolbar (#9823) * Invoke python with -O0 to save memory (#8431) * Fix Scratch sounds being jumpy (#9375) * Fix spurious linefeeds when resuming on VT (#9690) * Fix game keys not working with .epub files in Read (#9838) * Incorporate F11 updates since we entered 10.1.0 change control Package changes since build 64: -NetworkManager-0.7.2-1.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-0.7.2-2.git20091223.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-glib-0.7.2-1.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-glib-0.7.2-2.git20091223.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.2-1.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.2-2.git20091223.fc11.i586 -acl-2.2.47-4.fc11.i586 +acl-2.2.49-2.fc11.i586 -alsa-lib-1.0.21-3.fc11.i586 +alsa-lib-1.0.22-2.fc11.i586 +audacity-1.3.10-0.2.beta.fc11.i586 -audacity-1.3.9-0.3.beta.fc11.i586 -audit-1.7.16-1.fc11.i586 +audit-1.7.17-1.fc11.i586 -audit-libs-1.7.16-1.fc11.i586 +audit-libs-1.7.17-1.fc11.i586 -authconfig-5.4.10-1.fc11.i586 +authconfig-6.0.0-2.fc11.i586 -bash-4.0-8.fc11.i586 +bash-4.0-9.fc11.i586 -coreutils-7.2-4.fc11.i586 +coreutils-7.2-5.fc11.i586 -crda-1.1.0_2009.11.25-1.fc11.i586 +crda-1.1.0_2009.11.25-2.fc11.i586 +cups-libs-1.4.2-20.fc11.i586 -cups-libs-1.4.2-7.fc11.i586 -fedora-setup-keyboard-0.4-2.fc11.i586 +fedora-setup-keyboard-0.6-1.fc11.i586 -firefox-3.5.5-1.fc11.i586 +firefox-3.5.6-1.fc11.i586 -gimp-2.6.7-3.fc11.i586 +gimp-2.6.8-1.fc11.i586 -gimp-libs-2.6.7-3.fc11.i586 +gimp-libs-2.6.8-1.fc11.i586 -hulahop-0.4.9-10.fc11.i586 +hulahop-0.4.9-11.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091215.1440.1.olpc.9815d58.i586 +kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091228.0910.1.olpc.2029a80.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091215.1440.1.olpc.9815d58.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20091228.0910.1.olpc.2029a80.i586 -libacl-2.2.47-4.fc11.i586 +libacl-2.2.49-2.fc11.i586 -lyx-cmex10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-cmex10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-cmmi10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-cmmi10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-cmr10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-cmr10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-cmsy10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-cmsy10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-esint10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-esint10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-eufm10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-eufm10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-fonts-common-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-fonts-common-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-fonts-compat-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-fonts-compat-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-msam10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-msam10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-msbm10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-msbm10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch -lyx-wasy10-fonts-1.6.4-1.fc11.noarch +lyx-wasy10-fonts-1.6.5-2.fc11.noarch +ntfs-3g-2009.11.14-2.fc11.i586 -ntfs-3g-2009.4.4-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-kbdshim-10-1.20091229gitcd6f984.fc11.i586 -olpc-kbdshim-9-1.20091201git9d57880.fc11.i586 -olpc-utils-1.0.14-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-utils-1.0.15-1.fc11.i586 -pam-1.0.91-8.fc11.i586 +pam-1.0.91-9.fc11.i586 -rpm-4.7.1-3.fc11.i586 +rpm-4.7.2-1.fc11.i586 -rpm-libs-4.7.1-3.fc11.i586 +rpm-libs-4.7.2-1.fc11.i586 -rpm-python-4.7.1-3.fc11.i586 +rpm-python-4.7.2-1.fc11.i586 -squeak-vm-3.10.5-1.fc11.i586 +squeak-vm-3.10.5-2.fc11.i586 -sugar-datastore-0.84.0-1.fc11.i586 +sugar-datastore-0.84.1-1.fc11.i586 -tmpwatch-2.9.14-1.i586 +tmpwatch-2.9.17-1.fc11.i586 +xdg-utils-1.0.2-16.20091217cvs.fc11.noarch -xdg-utils-1.0.2-8.20081121cvs.fc11.noarch -xulrunner-1.9.1.5-1.fc11.i586 +xulrunner-1.9.1.6-1.fc11.i586 -xulrunner-python-1.9.1.5-1.fc11.i586 +xulrunner-python-1.9.1.6-1.fc11.i586