From skierpage at gmail.com Wed Jul 1 23:19:09 2009 From: skierpage at gmail.com (S Page) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:19:09 -0700 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> Message-ID: <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Martin Dengler wrote: > I'd suggest you ask sdz to make the .iso that he used to create the > .img file. On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > I'm very pleased to announce the first early preview of a new generation > of SoaS XO-1 images. Sir, could you upload the .iso for this image somewhere, maybe in a subdirectory of http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/ ? On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Actually, a tool that's most of this smartly, it's called jigdo, http://atterer.net/jigdo/ is indeed cool. It's presented as a tool for delivering and updating pieces of a single big file and all examples are a .iso big file. So long as it can also/instead use the same pieces to create a different kind of big file such as a bootable Live USB, or a writable SD partition, or XO-1 NAND contents, then it is indeed a great solution. Do the developers who work on Live USB Creator know about jigdo? Cheers, -- =S Page From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 2 20:48:39 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 15 Message-ID: <20090702204839.1E2B612647A@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os15 Compressed image size: 372.94mb (-6.05mb since build 13) Package changes since build 13: -ImageMagick-6.5.1.2-1.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-0.7.1-5.git20090617.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-0.7.1-6.git20090617.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-glib-0.7.1-5.git20090617.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-glib-0.7.1-6.git20090617.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.1-5.git20090617.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.1-6.git20090617.fc11.i586 -alpine-2.00-5.fc11.i586 -aspell-0.60.6-5.fc11.i586 +bitfrost-1.0.0-1.fc11.i586 +cpuspeed-1.5-10.fc11.i586 -cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586 +cups-libs-1.4-0.b2.18.fc11.i586 -cups-libs-1.4-0.rc1.4.fc11.i586 -dbus-1.2.12-1.fc11.i586 +dbus-1.2.12-2.fc11.i586 -dbus-libs-1.2.12-1.fc11.i586 +dbus-libs-1.2.12-2.fc11.i586 -dbus-x11-1.2.12-1.fc11.i586 +dbus-x11-1.2.12-2.fc11.i586 -device-mapper-multipath-0.4.8-10.fc11.i586 -dhclient-4.1.0-20.fc11.i586 +dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586 -dmraid-1.0.0.rc15-7.fc11.i586 -dracut-modules-olpc-0.1-2.fc11.i586 +dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.0-1.fc11.i586 -e2fsprogs-1.41.4-10.fc11.i586 +e2fsprogs-1.41.4-12.fc11.i586 -e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.4-10.fc11.i586 +e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.4-12.fc11.i586 -efibootmgr-0.5.4-6.fc11.i586 -espeak-1.39-2.fc11.i586 +espeak-1.40.02-2.fc11.i586 -evolution-data-server-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +evolution-data-server-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -firefox-3.5-0.20.beta4.fc11.i586 +firefox-3.5-1.fc11.i586 -fprintd-0.1-9.git04fd09cfa.fc11.i586 -fprintd-pam-0.1-9.git04fd09cfa.fc11.i586 -glib2-2.20.3-1.fc11.i586 +glib2-2.20.4-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-keyring-2.26.1-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-keyring-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-menus-2.26.1-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-menus-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-terminal-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-terminal-2.26.3.1-1.fc11.i586 -grub-0.97-51.fc11.i586 -gtk2-2.16.2-1.fc11.i586 +gtk2-2.16.3-1.fc11.i586 -hulahop-0.4.9-4.fc11.i586 +hulahop-0.4.9-5.fc11.i586 -hunspell-1.2.8-4.fc11.i586 +hunspell-1.2.8-5.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.30-20090629.1.olpc.b524b17.i586 +kernel-2.6.30-20090702.1.olpc.c8276d2.i586 -kpartx-0.4.8-10.fc11.i586 -lcms-libs-1.18-2.fc11.i586 -libaio-0.3.107-8.fc11.i586 +libdrm-2.4.11-2.fc11.i586 -libdrm-2.4.6-7.fc11.i586 -libfprint-0.1.0-7.pre2.fc11.1.i586 -libicu-4.0.1-4.fc11.i586 +libicu-4.0.1-5.fc11.i586 -libsoup-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +libsoup-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -libudev0-141-3.fc11.i586 +libudev0-141-4.fc11.i586 -libusb1-1.0.0-2.fc11.i586 -libvolume_id-141-3.fc11.i586 +libvolume_id-141-4.fc11.i586 -libwnck-2.26.1-1.fc11.i586 +libwnck-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 -libxcb-1.2-3.fc11.i586 +libxcb-1.2-4.fc11.i586 -libxfce4util-4.6.1-1.fc11.i586 -libxfcegui4-4.6.1-1.fc11.i586 -mailcap-2.1.29-2.fc11.noarch -mdadm-3.0-0.devel3.7.fc11.i586 +mdadm-3.0-1.fc11.i586 -microcode_ctl-1.17-1.51.fc11.i586 +nano-2.0.6-6.fc11.i586 -nash-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586 -nspr-4.7.4-1.fc11.i586 +nspr-4.8-1.fc11.i586 -olpc-bootanim-2.5-1.i586 -openssh-5.2p1-4.fc11.i586 +openssh-5.2p1-5.fc11.i586 -openssh-askpass-5.2p1-4.fc11.i586 +openssh-askpass-5.2p1-5.fc11.i586 -openssh-clients-5.2p1-4.fc11.i586 +openssh-clients-5.2p1-5.fc11.i586 -openssh-server-5.2p1-4.fc11.i586 +openssh-server-5.2p1-5.fc11.i586 -pam_krb5-2.3.5-1.fc11.i586 -pam_pkcs11-0.5.3-28.i586 -pango-1.24.2-1.fc11.i586 +pango-1.24.4-1.fc11.i586 -pcmciautils-015-2.fc11.i586 -plymouth-libs-0.7.0-0.2009.05.15.1.fc11.i586 -plymouth-plugin-label-0.7.0-0.2009.05.15.1.fc11.i586 -plymouth-plugin-throbgress-0.7.0-0.2009.05.15.1.fc11.i586 -plymouth-scripts-0.7.0-0.2009.05.15.1.fc11.i586 -plymouth-theme-spinfinity-0.7.0-0.2009.05.15.1.fc11.i586 -portaudio-19-8.fc11.i586 -rpcbind-0.2.0-1.fc11.i586 +rpcbind-0.2.0-2.fc11.i586 -sugar-update-control-0.20-5.fc11.noarch +sugar-update-control-0.20-6.fc11.noarch -totem-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +totem-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -totem-gstreamer-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +totem-gstreamer-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -totem-mozplugin-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +totem-mozplugin-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -totem-pl-parser-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +totem-pl-parser-2.26.2-2.fc11.i586 -udev-141-3.fc11.i586 +udev-141-4.fc11.i586 -xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-2.fc11.i586 -xfconf-4.6.1-1.fc11.i586 -xulrunner-1.9.1-0.20.beta4.fc11.i586 +xulrunner-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 -xulrunner-python-1.9.1-0.20.beta4.fc11.i586 +xulrunner-python-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 From skierpage at gmail.com Thu Jul 2 22:30:25 2009 From: skierpage at gmail.com (S Page) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:30:25 -0700 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 15 In-Reply-To: <20090702204839.1E2B612647A@dev.laptop.org> References: <20090702204839.1E2B612647A@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <6509bebe0907021530t2ffff93ewb1eb7f3ce4120686@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os15 Do these images run on XO-1's ? http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5#Requirements isn't explicit, it hints both ways ("*primarily* targeted at the XO 1.5... we must prioritize creating a shippable XO-1.5"). http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/ hasn't had a new build in a while. Thanks for all you do! -- =S Page From sebastian at when.com Thu Jul 2 22:33:22 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:33:22 +0200 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> S Page wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Martin Dengler wrote: >> I'd suggest you ask sdz to make the .iso that he used to create the >> .img file. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >> I'm very pleased to announce the first early preview of a new generation >> of SoaS XO-1 images. > Sir, could you upload the .iso for this image somewhere, maybe in a > subdirectory of http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/ ? Heh. Well, yeah, I usually would. But I don't have the .iso files around right now, so that we'd need to rebuild this. In the meantime, Martin Dengler has done some great work to incorporate more cool new stuff for the XO-1 into SoaS builds and I'd think there's a new build coming up soonish... ;) > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Martin > Langhoff wrote: >> Actually, a tool that's most of this smartly, it's called jigdo, > > http://atterer.net/jigdo/ is indeed cool. It's presented as a tool > for delivering and updating pieces of a single big file and all > examples are a .iso big file. So long as it can also/instead use the > same pieces to create a different kind of big file such as a bootable > Live USB, or a writable SD partition, or XO-1 NAND contents, then it > is indeed a great solution. Do the developers who work on Live USB > Creator know about jigdo? > > Cheers, > -- > =S Page From abo at root.snowtree.se Sat Jul 4 10:37:09 2009 From: abo at root.snowtree.se (Alexander =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?=) Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:37:09 +0200 Subject: olpc-switch-desktop issues In-Reply-To: <1246360421.2216.14.camel@polyethylene> References: <4A47C9F9.3010202@stacken.kth.se> <1246353745.2216.2.camel@polyethylene> <4A49E5EB.2030500@stacken.kth.se> <1246360421.2216.14.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <1246703829.14769.15.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> Den 2009-06-30 13:13, Daniel Drake skrev: > On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 12:16 +0200, Alexander Bostr?m wrote: > Maybe the problem is that the xdg-user-dirs component is not being > included in our session. Oh. It's probably a good idea to make sure that it's installed by default on all Sugar and GNOME distros. (KDE has a dependency on it, btw.) >> Btw, maybe olpc-switch-desktop should really just be writing to ~/.dmrc ? > > Which system component reads from that? I don't know if it's a proper standard, but GDM documents it here: http://library.gnome.org/admin/gdm/stable/configuration.html.en#userconfig /abo From abo at root.snowtree.se Sat Jul 4 10:37:52 2009 From: abo at root.snowtree.se (Alexander =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?=) Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:37:52 +0200 Subject: olpc-switch-desktop issues In-Reply-To: <1246366789.2216.15.camel@polyethylene> References: <4A47C9F9.3010202@stacken.kth.se> <1246353745.2216.2.camel@polyethylene> <4A49E5EB.2030500@stacken.kth.se> <1246366789.2216.15.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <1246703872.14769.16.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> Den 2009-06-30 14:59, Daniel Drake skrev: > OK, I changed olpc-session to better integrate with xinitrc.d and now it > creates and uses those localized directories, and puts the icon in the > right polace. Hmm... I can't find that changeset. Here's an rpm anyway: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/olpc-switch-desktop/ I haven't submitted it for review yet. /abo From sayamindu at gmail.com Thu Jul 9 09:24:55 2009 From: sayamindu at gmail.com (Sayamindu Dasgupta) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:54:55 +0530 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart Message-ID: Hello, OLPC's earlier build system (based on Pilgrim) has the option to specify a list of languages, and translations for all languages other than the specified ones would be filtered out. Is there anything equivalent in Kickstart ? I ask this because I have a patch for glibc (based on a patch used in Ubuntu) which lets one specify (via a configuration file) an alternate locale directory for updated translations which can be installed later on (at the site of deployment, for example). However, the current patch in its current form will not work if there are pre-existing translations in /usr/share/locale - so I was wondering if shipping a build without any preexisting translation, and then using the customization key to install the most up to date translations may be viable. Thank you, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 9 10:15:21 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:15:21 +0100 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 14:54 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > Hello, > > OLPC's earlier build system (based on Pilgrim) has the option to > specify a list of languages, and translations for all languages other > than the specified ones would be filtered out. Is there anything > equivalent in Kickstart ? I ask this because I have a patch for glibc > (based on a patch used in Ubuntu) which lets one specify (via a > configuration file) an alternate locale directory for updated > translations which can be installed later on (at the site of > deployment, for example). However, the current patch in its current > form will not work if there are pre-existing translations in > /usr/share/locale - so I was wondering if shipping a build without any > preexisting translation, and then using the customization key to > install the most up to date translations may be viable. Yes, we already specify which locales/languages we support: %packages --excludedocs --instLangs en:es:ar:pl:pt_BR:pt:it:fr:ht:el:mn:mr_IN:th:am_ET:km_KH:ne_NP:ur_PK:rw:ja:de:tr:te:ps:fa_AF:si but I don't particularly like the idea of excluding them all and then forcing every deployment to run the customization stick on every laptop. We need to do better than that. Daniel From sayamindu at gmail.com Thu Jul 9 10:53:16 2009 From: sayamindu at gmail.com (Sayamindu Dasgupta) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:23:16 +0530 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 14:54 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: >> Hello, >> >> OLPC's earlier build system (based on Pilgrim) has the option to >> specify a list of languages, and translations for all languages other >> than the specified ones would be filtered out. Is there anything >> equivalent in Kickstart ? I ask this because I have a patch for glibc >> (based on a patch used in Ubuntu) which lets one specify (via a >> configuration file) an alternate locale directory for updated >> translations which can be installed later on (at the site of >> deployment, for example). However, the current patch in its current >> form will not work if there are pre-existing translations in >> /usr/share/locale - so I was wondering if shipping a build without any >> preexisting translation, and then using the customization key to >> install the most up to date translations may be viable. > > Yes, we already specify which locales/languages we support: > > %packages --excludedocs --instLangs en:es:ar:pl:pt_BR:pt:it:fr:ht:el:mn:mr_IN:th:am_ET:km_KH:ne_NP:ur_PK:rw:ja:de:tr:te:ps:fa_AF:si > Superb... > but I don't particularly like the idea of excluding them all and then > forcing every deployment to run the customization stick on every laptop. > We need to do better than that. > Well, we can have an initial set of language packs pre-installed (taking the list from --instLangs). I am trying to set up a repository with RPMs generated from Pootle (similar to what we have today, but instead of self extracting archives, the packs will be RPMs). Does that sound like a viable option ? Thanks, Sayamindu > Daniel > > > -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 9 12:08:39 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:08:39 +0100 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:23 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > Well, we can have an initial set of language packs pre-installed > (taking the list from --instLangs). I am trying to set up a repository > with RPMs generated from Pootle (similar to what we have today, but > instead of self extracting archives, the packs will be RPMs). Does > that sound like a viable option ? I can still see some problems... You're working towards having these installable from a customization stick, right? On the customization stick, we would then want some way of differentiating language pack RPMs from other RPM packages - at least I don't think we want to give the ability to install RPMs in that fashion where we haven't before. Also, do these RPMs write outside of /home? If so, you break the fast, incremental olpc-update method. But one advantage of using RPMs is that you could push the following process to deployments: 1. install F11 on an x86 computer 2. run some simple commands to install livecd-creator and download our spec file 3. modify the spec file, adding in your language pack RPM 4. run a command to make a build and then they have their own *clean* build with their own language pack as a result. One disadvantage is that deployments (with secured laptops) that are not able to sign their own builds would be excluded..but this has always been the case. And I think the OLPC position at the moment is "big deployments should sign their own builds; small deployments should have security disabled" Might be worth a larger discussion with Chris and Ed. Daniel From sayamindu at gmail.com Thu Jul 9 16:48:33 2009 From: sayamindu at gmail.com (Sayamindu Dasgupta) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:18:33 +0530 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: CC += devel On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:23 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: >> Well, we can have an initial set of language packs pre-installed >> (taking the list from --instLangs). I am trying to set up a repository >> with RPMs generated from Pootle (similar to what we have today, but >> instead of self extracting archives, the packs will be RPMs). Does >> that sound like a viable option ? > > I can still see some problems... > > You're working towards having these installable from a customization > stick, right? > > On the customization stick, we would then want some way of > differentiating language pack RPMs from other RPM packages - at least I > don't think we want to give the ability to install RPMs in that fashion > where we haven't before. > I'm not sure how we can differentiate RPMs - can we use a different signing key, to sign the RPMs, for instance ? > Also, do these RPMs write outside of /home? If so, you break the fast, > incremental olpc-update method. > Hmm - I do agree that this breaks upgrade. > But one advantage of using RPMs is that you could push the following > process to deployments: > ?1. install F11 on an x86 computer > ?2. run some simple commands to install livecd-creator and download our > spec file > ?3. modify the spec file, adding in your language pack RPM > ?4. run a command to make a build > > and then they have their own *clean* build with their own language pack > as a result. > > One disadvantage is that deployments (with secured laptops) that are not > able to sign their own builds would be excluded..but this has always > been the case. And I think the OLPC position at the moment is "big > deployments should sign their own builds; small deployments should have > security disabled" > > Might be worth a larger discussion with Chris and Ed. > >From what it seems (except for the advantages you have described) - it may make sense to use the older system of zip files (or have, even translation bundles) and install it under /home/olpc (that can be easily done, since the patch allows to specify the directory, instead of hardcoding it, as in Ubuntu). This will a) Make translations persist across updates b) Require minimal changes to the existing customization key mechanism c) Require minimal changes to the existing language pack building mechanism d) Let users modify/enhance the translations themselves, via a Sugar activity Of course, we would miss the bells and whistle that come with RPMs, but I think this is better than overwriting and moving around existing MO files (which is what we do now). Thanks, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 9 17:58:51 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:58:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 16 Message-ID: <20090709175851.C2DDCFAB0A@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os16 Compressed image size: 371.61mb (-1.33mb since build 15) Package changes since build 15: -DeviceKit-disks-004-3.fc11.i586 +DeviceKit-disks-004-4.fc11.i586 +PolicyKit-olpc-1.2-2.fc11.noarch -cheese-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +cheese-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -cups-libs-1.4-0.b2.18.fc11.i586 +cups-libs-1.4-0.rc1.7.fc11.i586 +dmraid-1.0.0.rc15-7.fc11.i586 -dracut-0.1-1.fc11.i586 +dracut-0.3-1.fc11.i586 -file-roller-2.26.1-1.fc11.i586 +file-roller-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-desktop-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-desktop-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-panel-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-panel-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-panel-libs-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-panel-libs-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-session-2.26.1-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-session-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-session-xsession-2.26.1-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-session-xsession-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-themes-2.26.2-1.fc11.noarch +gnome-themes-2.26.3-1.fc11.noarch -gsm-1.0.12-7.fc11.i586 -gtk2-2.16.3-1.fc11.i586 +gtk2-2.16.4-1.fc11.i586 +kpartx-0.4.8-10.fc11.i586 -libao-0.8.8-6.fc11.i586 -libgweather-2.26.1-3.fc11.i586 +libgweather-2.26.2.1-1.fc11.i586 -libpurple-2.5.7-1.fc11.i586 +libpurple-2.5.8-1.fc11.i586 -libsamplerate-0.1.6-2.fc11.i586 -libtiff-3.8.2-12.fc11.i586 +libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc11.i586 +lvm2-2.02.45-4.fc11.i586 -mozplugger-1.12.1-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-bootanim-2.5-1.i586 -sed-4.1.5-12.fc11.i586 +sed-4.2.1-1.fc11.i586 -sox-14.2.0-2.fc11.i586 -tar-1.22-2.fc11.i586 +tar-1.22-3.fc11.i586 From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 9 21:00:20 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:00:20 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 17 Message-ID: <20090709210020.C6BA2FAB0A@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os17 Compressed image size: 371.75mb (+0.14mb since build 16) Package changes since build 16: +sugar-0.84.5-1.fc11.1.i586 -sugar-0.84.5-1.fc11.i586 From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 9 21:45:31 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:45:31 +0100 Subject: olpc-switch-desktop issues In-Reply-To: <1246703872.14769.16.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> References: <4A47C9F9.3010202@stacken.kth.se> <1246353745.2216.2.camel@polyethylene> <4A49E5EB.2030500@stacken.kth.se> <1246366789.2216.15.camel@polyethylene> <1246703872.14769.16.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> Message-ID: <1247175931.1689.44.camel@polyethylene> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 12:37 +0200, Alexander Bostr?m wrote: > Den 2009-06-30 14:59, Daniel Drake skrev: > > > OK, I changed olpc-session to better integrate with xinitrc.d and now it > > creates and uses those localized directories, and puts the icon in the > > right polace. > > Hmm... I can't find that changeset. > > Here's an rpm anyway: > > http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/olpc-switch-desktop/ > Thanks for your efforts. I cleaned up the package and have created a review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510626 Daniel From pbrobinson at gmail.com Fri Jul 10 10:02:48 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:02:48 +0100 Subject: XO-1 Camera in F11? In-Reply-To: <242851610907100257v283fc87ch41f6cdad37a9a311@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090710094309.GT21771@ops-13.xades.com> <242851610907100257v283fc87ch41f6cdad37a9a311@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907100302u266f240jb52cbe3d3726122f@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:43, Martin Dengler wrote: >> Has anyone seen the XO-1 camera working (or even just detected) in >> Record or Cheese with F11? >> >> I'm using the latest kernels with this change, so I don't think it's >> (just) that: >> >> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-May/024363.html > > This is the relevant ticket in fedora's bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498900 > > May be good to keep it updated. I'm adding fedora-olpc to cc in case > someone there can help debugging this. The last time I tried it didn't work, its been on my todo list to retest a vanilla F11 on the XO for a while. Has the one line patch been pushed upstream yet? Peter From martin at martindengler.com Fri Jul 10 10:44:26 2009 From: martin at martindengler.com (Martin Dengler) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:44:26 +0100 Subject: XO-1 Camera in F11? In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0907100302u266f240jb52cbe3d3726122f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090710094309.GT21771@ops-13.xades.com> <242851610907100257v283fc87ch41f6cdad37a9a311@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0907100302u266f240jb52cbe3d3726122f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090710104426.GW21771@ops-13.xades.com> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:02:48AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:43, Martin Dengler wrote: > >> Has anyone seen the XO-1 camera working (or even just detected) in > >> Record or Cheese with F11? > >> > Has the one line patch been pushed upstream yet? > >> I'm using the latest kernels with this change Yup. > Peter Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From abo at root.snowtree.se Fri Jul 10 19:38:15 2009 From: abo at root.snowtree.se (Alexander =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?=) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:38:15 +0200 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <1247254695.18171.49.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> I'm completely ignorant regarding how translations work even in plain Fedora and even more so for the OLPC systems, but pray tell, why can't these translations be shipped as regular Fedora updates? /abo From abo at root.snowtree.se Fri Jul 10 19:58:01 2009 From: abo at root.snowtree.se (Alexander =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?=) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:58:01 +0200 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <1247255881.18171.50.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> I'm completely ignorant regarding how translations work even in plain Fedora and even more so for the OLPC systems, but pray tell, why can't these translations be shipped as regular Fedora updates? /abo From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 10 20:08:59 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:08:59 +0100 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: <1247255881.18171.50.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> <1247255881.18171.50.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> Message-ID: <1247256539.1914.61.camel@polyethylene> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Alexander Bostr?m wrote: > I'm completely ignorant regarding how translations work even in plain > Fedora and even more so for the OLPC systems, but pray tell, why can't > these translations be shipped as regular Fedora updates? Because we have no way of distributing such updates that is suitable for deployments. Also, for various reasons, many deployments run software that is no longer maintained. All of the XO deployments run sugar-0.82 on Fedora 9 but nobody is doing releases of that any more. OLPC has historically done releases every 6 months, and usually as it happens, the deployments receive the releases before creating a sufficiently sized translator team, so the translations come later. And in the past, only OLPC could make and sign builds. Now deployments can do this too, but it remains to be seen how realistic this is in the field. Unfortunately, a lot of deployments do not have the resources or know-how in order to do this. Daniel From sayamindu at gmail.com Fri Jul 10 20:11:06 2009 From: sayamindu at gmail.com (Sayamindu Dasgupta) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:41:06 +0530 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: <1247255881.18171.50.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> <1247255881.18171.50.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> Message-ID: Hi, 2009/7/11 Alexander Bostr?m : > I'm completely ignorant regarding how translations work even in plain > Fedora and even more so for the OLPC systems, but pray tell, why can't > these translations be shipped as regular Fedora updates? There are quite a few reasons. For example, our official, stable build (version 8.2.1) is based on Fedora 9 (which has been officially end-of-lifed recently), and runs Sugar 0.82, which has not seen any package upgrade in at least the 6 months (I'm not blaming the Sugar devs here, they are resource-starved, and need to prioritize accordingly). I don't see the official build changing before the last quarter of this year, and I know for sure, that at least one large scale pilot (>1000 machines) is going to be deployed for the first time a certain region (translations for at least one of the languages to be enabled in that pilot did not exist a few months back). Doing new package releases is not feasible in this scenario. Even when we have an up to date system (eg F11 based), translation is usually typically done in many cases via a set of translation sprints at the very last moment. Submitting those translations upstream, then chasing down each and every package maintainer (upstream as well as distro) to do new releases within a very short timeframe is not something that is realistically possible. Hence the need for decoupling our translation process from the release and packaging process. Thanks, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] From abo at root.snowtree.se Fri Jul 10 20:24:23 2009 From: abo at root.snowtree.se (Alexander =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?=) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:24:23 +0200 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: <1247256539.1914.61.camel@polyethylene> References: <1247134521.1689.9.camel@polyethylene> <1247141319.1689.37.camel@polyethylene> <1247255881.18171.50.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> <1247256539.1914.61.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <1247257463.18171.57.camel@tempo.alexander.bostrom.net> fre 2009-07-10 klockan 21:08 +0100 skrev Daniel Drake: > > OLPC has historically done releases every 6 months, and usually as it > happens, the deployments receive the releases before creating a > sufficiently sized translator team, so the translations come later. > > And in the past, only OLPC could make and sign builds. Now deployments > can do this too, but it remains to be seen how realistic this is in the > field. Unfortunately, a lot of deployments do not have the resources or > know-how in order to do this. I see, thanks for the explanation. I wish I could suggest a pretty solution, but I know it's not that simple. :) /abo From michael at laptop.org Sat Jul 11 01:59:54 2009 From: michael at laptop.org (Michael Stone) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:59:54 -0400 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090711015954.GC5073@heat> Sayamindu, I like your answer but I think that it leaves some important goals unstated -- most notably, click2trans, horizontal distribution of translations, and translation undo. See http://cscott.net/Publications/OLPC/fudcon-i18n.pdf and http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-June/015838.html for the writeups and http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/cscott/click2trans for the prototype code. Thoughts? Regards, Michael From mikus at bga.com Sun Jul 12 12:39:57 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:39:57 -0400 Subject: F11 package update discrepancy using yum Message-ID: <4A59D99D.2050806@bga.com> On my XO-1 with F11-based build devxo-1, when I do 'yum check-update' it lists several packages available for updating. Yet when I then do 'yum upgrade' it tells me these packages cannot be found on any of the mirrors. mikus From pbrobinson at gmail.com Mon Jul 13 07:42:13 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:42:13 +0100 Subject: F11 package update discrepancy using yum In-Reply-To: <4A59D99D.2050806@bga.com> References: <4A59D99D.2050806@bga.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907130042s1e72d51cnefa34a70b100fa3b@mail.gmail.com> Hi Mikus, > lists several packages available for updating. > Yet when I then do 'yum upgrade' it tells me these packages cannot be found > on any of the mirrors. You'll quite often see that when the mirror is still syncing. Peter From sayamindu at gmail.com Mon Jul 13 11:12:23 2009 From: sayamindu at gmail.com (Sayamindu Dasgupta) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:42:23 +0530 Subject: FIltering out languages via kickstart In-Reply-To: <20090711015954.GC5073@heat> References: <20090711015954.GC5073@heat> Message-ID: Hi Michael, On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Michael Stone wrote: > Sayamindu, > > I like your answer but I think that it leaves some important goals unstated > -- > most notably, click2trans, horizontal distribution of translations, and > translation undo. > > See http://cscott.net/Publications/OLPC/fudcon-i18n.pdf and > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-June/015838.html for the > writeups and > http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/cscott/click2trans for the prototype code. > > Thoughts? > One of the main requirements of the features outlined in Scott's presentation (especially click2trans) is the ability to have translations which are editable by the non-root user. I think storing translations in $HOME addresses that. The ability to edit will definitely necessitate a "Undo" function, and the first step towards that would be store a copy of the original translation pack somewhere locally (version control is another possibility, but I would probably try to avoid more than what I can chew at the moment :-). Another very important aspect is to try to ensure the validity of individual messages as they get translated (eg: making sure that "%s foo" is translated as "%s bar", and not simply as "bar" or "%z bar"). This validation can be done by libgettextpo, and I have been slowly working on python bindings for this (http://code.google.com/p/pygettextpo/). Regarding distribution of translations, apart from click2trans, we can also have an activity like Develop which would enable users to translate activities, as well as share translations and translation memories. In this regard, Google's recently announced translator toolkit might provide some inspirations :-) (http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/06/translating-worlds-information-with.html) Thanks, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] From mikus at bga.com Mon Jul 13 11:45:12 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:45:12 -0400 Subject: F11 package update discrepancy using yum Message-ID: <4A5B1E48.7030605@bga.com> >> lists several packages available for updating. >> Yet when I then do 'yum upgrade' it tells me these packages cannot be found >> on any of the mirrors. > > You'll quite often see that when the mirror is still syncing. Then I must be extremely unlucky, in that *every* time I type in 'yum upgrade', the mirrors happen to be "still syncing". I got this "no more mirrors to try" response to 'yum upgrade' multiple times on July 11 and July 12 (and now on July 13) -- in fact, on every 'yum upgrade' I've tried in the last several days. I looked with a browser inside one of the attempted mirror repositories (fedora/updates/11/i386) - and yes, the package level that my 'yum upgrade' was looking for is *not* there. The most recent timestamp for any of the packages there says July 9. I wish that repository would get a move on with its syncing. mikus From pbrobinson at gmail.com Mon Jul 13 12:54:29 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:54:29 +0100 Subject: F11 package update discrepancy using yum In-Reply-To: <4A5B1E48.7030605@bga.com> References: <4A5B1E48.7030605@bga.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907130554y5b57ab1dx7c3c59f4c5818aac@mail.gmail.com> >>> lists several packages available for updating. >>> Yet when I then do 'yum upgrade' it tells me these packages cannot be >>> found >>> on any of the mirrors. >> >> You'll quite often see that when the mirror is still syncing. > > Then I must be extremely unlucky, in that *every* time I type in 'yum > upgrade', the mirrors happen to be "still syncing". > > I got this "no more mirrors to try" response to 'yum upgrade' multiple times > on July 11 and July 12 (and now on July 13) -- in fact, on every 'yum > upgrade' I've tried in the last several days. > > I looked with a browser inside one of the attempted mirror repositories > (fedora/updates/11/i386) - and yes, the package level that my 'yum upgrade' > was looking for is *not* there. ?The most recent timestamp for any of the > packages there says July 9. ?I wish that repository would get a move on with > its syncing. It looks like there might be an issue with the mirrors. There hasn't been a push to the mirrors for around 10 days or so. That was rectified in the last day or two but then there looked to be an issue with the mirror system. I was having the same problem this morning but my local mirror seems to have begun working in the last hour or two so maybe its been rectified. Peter From sebastian at when.com Mon Jul 13 14:01:12 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:01:12 +0200 Subject: SoaS Meeting TODAY at 10.30 EDT Message-ID: <4A5B3E28.2090400@when.com> Sorry for the short notice, but please join if you can. That's in half an hour from now! Topics will include the roadmap & features for v2. --Sebastian From pbrobinson at gmail.com Mon Jul 13 14:59:17 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:59:17 +0100 Subject: [Sugar-devel] SoaS Meeting TODAY at 10.30 EDT In-Reply-To: <4A5B3E28.2090400@when.com> References: <4A5B3E28.2090400@when.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907130759wa489d24x6d231eefb72c1c42@mail.gmail.com> Hi Sebastian, Sorry I missed this one. Will the minutes be published anywhere? Peter On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Sorry for the short notice, but please join if you can. That's in half > an hour from now! Topics will include the roadmap & features for v2. > > --Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > From fgrose at gmail.com Mon Jul 13 16:11:23 2009 From: fgrose at gmail.com (Frederick Grose) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Sugar-devel] SoaS Meeting TODAY at 10.30 EDT In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0907130759wa489d24x6d231eefb72c1c42@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A5B3E28.2090400@when.com> <5256d0b0907130759wa489d24x6d231eefb72c1c42@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MeetBot Log: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090713_1034.html MeetBot outline: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.minutes.20090713_1034.html On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Sorry I missed this one. Will the minutes be published anywhere? > > Peter > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Sebastian Dziallas > wrote: > > Sorry for the short notice, but please join if you can. That's in half > > an hour from now! Topics will include the roadmap & features for v2. > > > > --Sebastian > > _______________________________________________ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sebastian at when.com Mon Jul 13 17:01:36 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:01:36 +0200 Subject: [Sugar-devel] SoaS Meeting TODAY at 10.30 EDT In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0907130759wa489d24x6d231eefb72c1c42@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A5B3E28.2090400@when.com> <5256d0b0907130759wa489d24x6d231eefb72c1c42@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4A5B6870.9000900@when.com> Well, that's certainly understandable, given that I rushed the whole thing quite a bit. 30 Minutes is not that much time... ;) Fred was still quicker with posting the logs... thanks! --Sebastian Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Sorry I missed this one. Will the minutes be published anywhere? > > Peter > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >> Sorry for the short notice, but please join if you can. That's in half >> an hour from now! Topics will include the roadmap& features for v2. >> >> --Sebastian >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel From sdaly.be at gmail.com Mon Jul 13 17:02:58 2009 From: sdaly.be at gmail.com (Sean DALY) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:02:58 +0200 Subject: [Sugar-devel] SoaS Meeting TODAY at 10.30 EDT In-Reply-To: References: <4A5B3E28.2090400@when.com> <5256d0b0907130759wa489d24x6d231eefb72c1c42@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <378b2b050907131002i3347b4cdl8d2ecc9e8645cf44@mail.gmail.com> I'm sorry I missed this. Re deployments. I think (beyond Local Labs) we need to reflect on how to create an ecosystem for providers to schools - deployers. We absolutely need to be present ourselves at pilots (I hope to start one or two in Paris), but that's only because we have lacked the feedback. However, of course that doesn't scale. As we gain experience and deal with the more serious issues (difficulty of exiting Activities, etc.), we can work on how deployers or local Labs could return structured or consolidated feedback. SoaS is a key part of convincing a school to pilot Sugar; moving to Sugar on anything else is in my view most likely a second step. Sebastian - When I can I will look over the SoaS v2 features wiki page (I will be travelling again over the next couple of days). I'm wondering if a simpler (i.e. more teacher-friendly) method than installing and configuring a school server can be found to back up Learners' Journals from sticks, since it is 100% guaranteed that sticks will be damaged or lost in a school setting. Perhaps a designated PC with multiple USB ports (breakout hub), which could extract Journals with a script, by Learner name? Sean On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Frederick Grose wrote: > MeetBot Log: > http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090713_1034.html > MeetBot outline: > http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.minutes.20090713_1034.html > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Peter Robinson > wrote: >> >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> Sorry I missed this one. Will the minutes be published anywhere? >> >> Peter >> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Sebastian Dziallas >> wrote: >> > Sorry for the short notice, but please join if you can. That's in half >> > an hour from now! Topics will include the roadmap & features for v2. >> > >> > --Sebastian >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Sugar-devel mailing list >> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-olpc-list mailing list >> Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > From dsd at laptop.org Tue Jul 14 16:26:08 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:26:08 +0100 Subject: reviving XO-1 OS builds Message-ID: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> Hi, I wrote some notes on how someone could build new OS images for XO-1 based on the ongoing XO-1.5 software efforts, and how this could be run as a community-driven process: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO1 A fairly decent general knowledge of the Linux ecosystem is necessary, but it is not an overly difficult task. Anyone interested? Daniel From martin at martindengler.com Tue Jul 14 20:28:51 2009 From: martin at martindengler.com (Martin Dengler) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:28:51 +0100 Subject: reviving XO-1 OS builds In-Reply-To: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> References: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <20090714202849.GX21771@ops-13.xades.com> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:26:08PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > Anyone interested? I tweaked the wiki page a tiny bit and tried on my own machine. I'm using my own F10 machine for now, but can't practically upload anywhere. xo-1 branch is a tiny bit away from building right now[1], unfort. Patch below: From 9e09c3deb7de1e37c9784e7cb2fa73e6224bf779 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Dengler Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:27:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] add F11-updates and F11-testing (for dracut, etc.) --- olpc-base.ks | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/olpc-base.ks b/olpc-base.ks index c72c8ff..d0b3088 100644 --- a/olpc-base.ks +++ b/olpc-base.ks @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ repo --name=olpc --cost=3 --baseurl=http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/xo1-rpms repo --name=olpc-kernel --cost=5 --baseurl=http://dev.laptop.org/~dilinger/2.6.30-rc5 repo --name=F11 --cost=10 --mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-11&arch=i386 --excludepkgs=PolicyKit-kde +repo --name=F11-updates --cost=9 --mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-released-f11&arch=i386 +repo --name=F11-updates-testing --cost=8 --mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-testing-f11&arch=i386 # Enable if the mirrors aren't up to date yet. # repo --name=rawhide --baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os --excludepkgs=PolicyKit-kde -- 1.6.0.6 > Daniel Martin 1. [martin at ops-13 output]$ nice make -j 3 -f ../Makefile os1.img sudo livecd-creator --cache=../cache --fslabel os1 -c ../olpc-desktop.ks mke2fs 1.41.4 (27-Jan-2009) Filesystem label=os1 OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) 98304 inodes, 393216 blocks 3932 blocks (1.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 Maximum filesystem blocks=402653184 12 block groups 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group 8192 inodes per group Superblock backups stored on blocks: 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912 Writing inode tables: done Creating journal (8192 blocks): done Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done This filesystem will be automatically checked every 27 mounts or 180 days, whichever comes first. Use tune2fs -c or -i to override. tune2fs 1.41.4 (27-Jan-2009) Setting maximal mount count to -1 Setting interval between checks to 0 seconds Retrieving http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/11/Everything/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml ...OK Retrieving http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/xo1-rpms/repodata/repomd.xml ...OK Retrieving http://dev.laptop.org/~dilinger/2.6.30-rc5/repodata/repomd.xml ...OK Excluding Packages from None Finished kernel-2.6.30-20090621.1.olpc.db92a09.i586 from olpc-kernel has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: dracut is needed by package kernel-2.6.30-20090621.1.olpc.db92a09.i586 (olpc-kernel) kernel-2.6.30-20090621.1.olpc.db92a09.i586 from olpc-kernel has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: dracut is needed by package kernel-2.6.30-20090621.1.olpc.db92a09.i586 (olpc-kernel) Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction : Missing Dependency: dracut is needed by package kernel-2.6.30-20090621.1.olpc.db92a09.i586 (olpc-kernel) make: *** [os1.iso] Error 1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pbrobinson at gmail.com Tue Jul 14 20:36:13 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:36:13 +0100 Subject: reviving XO-1 OS builds In-Reply-To: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> References: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907141336o15d1b40ar619d3b74690aa082@mail.gmail.com> > I wrote some notes on how someone could build new OS images for XO-1 > based on the ongoing XO-1.5 software efforts, and how this could be run > as a community-driven process: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO1 > > A fairly decent general knowledge of the Linux ecosystem is necessary, > but it is not an overly difficult task. > > Anyone interested? Yes! I'm going to look at it but I don't think its going to happen this week, but it looks like Martin has had a look and I'll work with him to get it happening. Peter From martin at martindengler.com Tue Jul 14 20:38:00 2009 From: martin at martindengler.com (Martin Dengler) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:38:00 +0100 Subject: reviving XO-1 OS builds In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0907141336o15d1b40ar619d3b74690aa082@mail.gmail.com> References: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> <5256d0b0907141336o15d1b40ar619d3b74690aa082@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090714203759.GZ21771@ops-13.xades.com> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:36:13PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > I wrote some notes on how someone could build new OS images for XO-1 > > based on the ongoing XO-1.5 software efforts, and how this could be run > > as a community-driven process: > > > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO1 > > > > A fairly decent general knowledge of the Linux ecosystem is necessary, > > but it is not an overly difficult task. > > > > Anyone interested? > > Yes! I'm going to look at it but I don't think its going to happen > this week, but it looks like Martin has had a look and I'll work with > him to get it happening. Awesome :) Go for it! > Peter Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 16 18:08:37 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:08:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 18 Message-ID: <20090716180837.4176FFAB05@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os18 Compressed image size: 373.76mb (+2.02mb since build 17) Package changes since build 17: -DeviceKit-power-008-1.fc11.i586 +DeviceKit-power-009-1.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-0.7.1-4.git20090414.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-0.7.1-6.git20090617.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-glib-0.7.1-4.git20090414.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-glib-0.7.1-6.git20090617.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.1-4.git20090414.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.1-6.git20090617.fc11.i586 +binutils-2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11.i586 -boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.i586 +boost-1.37.0-7.fc11.i586 -device-mapper-1.02.31-4.fc11.i586 +device-mapper-1.02.33-1.fc11.i586 -device-mapper-libs-1.02.31-4.fc11.i586 +device-mapper-libs-1.02.33-1.fc11.i586 -dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586 +dhclient-4.1.0-23.fc11.i586 -dracut-0.3-1.fc11.i586 +dracut-0.4-1.fc11.i586 -gedit-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +gedit-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-desktop-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-desktop-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-power-manager-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-power-manager-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 +hunspell-1.2.8-4.fc11.i586 -hunspell-1.2.8-5.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.30-20090702.1.olpc.c8276d2.i586 +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090715.2052.1.olpc.9058dae.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090715.2052.1.olpc.9058dae.i586 +libv4l-0.5.9-1.fc11.i586 -libv4l-0.5.99-1.fc11.i586 -lvm2-2.02.45-4.fc11.i586 +lvm2-2.02.48-1.fc11.i586 -mobile-broadband-provider-info-0.20090602-2.fc11.noarch +nfs-utils-1.1.5-6.fc11.i586 -nfs-utils-1.2.0-3.fc11.i586 +olpc-contents-2.6-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-update-2.19-1.fc11.noarch -olpc-utils-1.0.2-1.fc11.i586 +olpc-utils-1.0.3-1.fc11.i586 +python-2.6-11.fc11.i586 -python-2.6-9.fc11.i586 +python-libs-2.6-11.fc11.i586 -python-libs-2.6-9.fc11.i586 +sudo-1.7.1-1.fc11.i586 -sudo-1.7.1-2.fc11.i586 -sugar-0.84.5-1.fc11.1.i586 +sugar-0.84.5-1.fc11.2.i586 +wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-2.fc11.i586 -wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-4.fc11.i586 +xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.1.901-1.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.1.901-2.fc11.i586 +xorg-x11-server-common-1.6.1.901-1.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-server-common-1.6.1.901-2.fc11.i586 From dsd at laptop.org Thu Jul 16 21:57:21 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:57:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 Message-ID: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20 Compressed image size: 373.99mb (+0.22mb since build 18) Package changes since build 18: -NetworkManager-0.7.1-4.git20090414.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-0.7.1-8.git20090708.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-glib-0.7.1-4.git20090414.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-glib-0.7.1-8.git20090708.fc11.i586 -NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.1-4.git20090414.fc11.i586 +NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.1-8.git20090708.fc11.i586 -bitfrost-1.0.0-1.fc11.i586 +bitfrost-1.0.1-1.fc11.i586 -coreutils-7.2-1.fc11.i586 +coreutils-7.2-2.fc11.i586 -gnome-desktop-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 +gnome-desktop-2.26.3-2.fc11.i586 -hunspell-1.2.8-4.fc11.i586 +hunspell-1.2.8-7.fc11.i586 -iw-0.9.14-1.fc11.i586 +iw-0.9.15-1.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090715.2052.1.olpc.9058dae.i586 +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090716.0546.1.olpc.ee2f419.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090715.2052.1.olpc.9058dae.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090716.0546.1.olpc.ee2f419.i586 -libX11-1.2.1-2.fc11.i586 +libX11-1.2.2-1.fc11.i586 -libpurple-2.5.8-1.fc11.i586 +libpurple-2.5.8-2.fc11.i586 -libtdb-1.1.3-14.fc11.i586 +libtdb-1.1.5-0.fc11.i586 -libv4l-0.5.9-1.fc11.i586 +libv4l-0.6.0-1.fc11.i586 +mobile-broadband-provider-info-1.20090707-1.fc11.noarch -nfs-utils-1.1.5-6.fc11.i586 +nfs-utils-1.2.0-3.fc11.i586 -olpc-library-2.0.0-1.fc11.noarch +olpc-library-2.0.2-1.fc11.noarch -perl-5.10.0-69.fc11.i586 +perl-5.10.0-73.fc11.i586 -perl-Module-Pluggable-3.60-69.fc11.i586 +perl-Module-Pluggable-3.60-73.fc11.i586 -perl-Pod-Escapes-1.04-69.fc11.i586 +perl-Pod-Escapes-1.04-73.fc11.i586 -perl-Pod-Simple-3.07-69.fc11.i586 +perl-Pod-Simple-3.07-73.fc11.i586 -perl-libs-5.10.0-69.fc11.i586 +perl-libs-5.10.0-73.fc11.i586 -perl-version-0.74-69.fc11.i586 +perl-version-0.74-73.fc11.i586 -policycoreutils-2.0.62-12.11.fc11.i586 +policycoreutils-2.0.62-12.12.fc11.i586 -rsyslog-3.21.11-1.fc11.i586 +rsyslog-3.22.1-1.fc11.i586 -sudo-1.7.1-1.fc11.i586 +sudo-1.7.1-4.fc11.i586 -sugar-toolkit-0.84.4-1.fc11.i586 +sugar-toolkit-0.84.5-1.fc11.i586 -sugar-update-control-0.20-6.fc11.noarch +sugar-update-control-0.21-2.fc11.noarch -wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-2.fc11.i586 +wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-4.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.1.901-1.fc11.i586 +xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.2-2.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-server-common-1.6.1.901-1.fc11.i586 +xorg-x11-server-common-1.6.2-2.fc11.i586 From mpsolberg at gmail.com Thu Jul 16 22:24:07 2009 From: mpsolberg at gmail.com (Michael Solberg) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:24:07 -0400 Subject: reviving XO-1 OS builds In-Reply-To: <20090714202849.GX21771@ops-13.xades.com> References: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> <20090714202849.GX21771@ops-13.xades.com> Message-ID: <236c4bf60907161524y66b09cdck478b63bcaabbd052@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:26:08PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: >> Anyone interested? > > I tweaked the wiki page a tiny bit and tried on my own machine. ?I'm > using my own F10 machine for now, but can't practically upload > anywhere. > I really have no idea how to use git, but I and a couple of other people have had some trouble checking out the xo-1 branch. Can you point us in the right direction? Here's what I've done: bash-4.0$ git clone git://dev.laptop.org/projects/fedora-xo Initialized empty Git repository in /home/misha/git/fedora-xo/.git/ remote: Generating pack... remote: Done counting 558 objects. remote: Deltifying 558 objects... remote: 100% (558/558) done remote: Total 558 (delta 322), reused 0 (delta 0) Receiving objects: 100% (558/558), 104.08 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (322/322), done. bash-4.0$ cd fedora-xo/ bash-4.0$ git checkout xo-1 error: pathspec 'xo-1' did not match any file(s) known to git. bash-4.0$ git branch * master Thanks! Michael. From andresambrois at gmail.com Thu Jul 16 22:39:53 2009 From: andresambrois at gmail.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Andr=E9s_Ambrois?=) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:39:53 -0300 Subject: reviving XO-1 OS builds In-Reply-To: <236c4bf60907161524y66b09cdck478b63bcaabbd052@mail.gmail.com> References: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> <20090714202849.GX21771@ops-13.xades.com> <236c4bf60907161524y66b09cdck478b63bcaabbd052@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200907161939.53597.andresambrois@gmail.com> On Thursday 16 July 2009 07:24:07 pm Michael Solberg wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Martin Dengler wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:26:08PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > >> Anyone interested? > > > > I tweaked the wiki page a tiny bit and tried on my own machine. I'm > > using my own F10 machine for now, but can't practically upload > > anywhere. > > I really have no idea how to use git, but I and a couple of other > people have had some trouble checking out the xo-1 branch. Can you > point us in the right direction? Here's what I've done: Try git checkout --track -b xo-1 origin/xo-1 > bash-4.0$ git clone git://dev.laptop.org/projects/fedora-xo > Initialized empty Git repository in /home/misha/git/fedora-xo/.git/ > remote: Generating pack... > remote: Done counting 558 objects. > remote: Deltifying 558 objects... > remote: 100% (558/558) done > remote: Total 558 (delta 322), reused 0 (delta 0) > Receiving objects: 100% (558/558), 104.08 KiB, done. > Resolving deltas: 100% (322/322), done. > bash-4.0$ cd fedora-xo/ > bash-4.0$ git checkout xo-1 > error: pathspec 'xo-1' did not match any file(s) known to git. > bash-4.0$ git branch > * master > > Thanks! > > Michael. > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list -- -Andr?s From mpsolberg at gmail.com Thu Jul 16 23:31:54 2009 From: mpsolberg at gmail.com (Michael Solberg) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:31:54 -0400 Subject: reviving XO-1 OS builds In-Reply-To: <200907161939.53597.andresambrois@gmail.com> References: <1247588768.1700.26.camel@polyethylene> <20090714202849.GX21771@ops-13.xades.com> <236c4bf60907161524y66b09cdck478b63bcaabbd052@mail.gmail.com> <200907161939.53597.andresambrois@gmail.com> Message-ID: <236c4bf60907161631m1a277474x48490250c8c03607@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Andr?s Ambrois wrote: > On Thursday 16 July 2009 07:24:07 pm Michael Solberg wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Martin Dengler > wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:26:08PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: >> >> Anyone interested? >> > >> > I tweaked the wiki page a tiny bit and tried on my own machine. ?I'm >> > using my own F10 machine for now, but can't practically upload >> > anywhere. >> >> I really have no idea how to use git, but I and a couple of other >> people have had some trouble checking out the xo-1 branch. ?Can you >> point us in the right direction? ?Here's what I've done: > > Try git checkout --track -b xo-1 origin/xo-1 Perfect. Thanks. From martin at martindengler.com Fri Jul 17 00:22:51 2009 From: martin at martindengler.com (Martin Dengler) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:22:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] add F11-updates and F11-testing (for dracut, etc.) In-Reply-To: <20090714202849.GX21771@ops-13.xades.com> References: <20090714202849.GX21771@ops-13.xades.com> Message-ID: <1247790171-8996-1-git-send-email-martin@martindengler.com> --- olpc-base.ks | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/olpc-base.ks b/olpc-base.ks index c72c8ff..d0b3088 100644 --- a/olpc-base.ks +++ b/olpc-base.ks @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ repo --name=olpc --cost=3 --baseurl=http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/xo1-rpms repo --name=olpc-kernel --cost=5 --baseurl=http://dev.laptop.org/~dilinger/2.6.30-rc5 repo --name=F11 --cost=10 --mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-11&arch=i386 --excludepkgs=PolicyKit-kde +repo --name=F11-updates --cost=9 --mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-released-f11&arch=i386 +repo --name=F11-updates-testing --cost=8 --mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-testing-f11&arch=i386 # Enable if the mirrors aren't up to date yet. # repo --name=rawhide --baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os --excludepkgs=PolicyKit-kde -- 1.6.0.6 From skierpage at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 11:04:17 2009 From: skierpage at gmail.com (S Page) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:04:17 -0700 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20/os20.packages.txt is 630 packages, for comparison the 8.2.1 build log http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/8.2.1/build802/devel_ext3/build.log had 402 packages. Obviously the new builds have an entire Gnome desktop, but some areas seemed a bit bloat-ish. I see perl. Back in 2008 bonobo was pulling in Perl, and I see bonobo. But there's no more gnome-python2-bonobo, so what requires bonobo? Maybe there are unfixed packaging issues from http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Distro_version_migration_nastiness 8.2.1 had no man/pod/info pages, but I see ghostscript, groff, rarian, etc. There's matchbox and metacity, I thought Sugar was switching to Metacity? etc. No worries, I'm just curious. -- =S Page From pbrobinson at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 13:06:25 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:06:25 +0100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907170606k75c6784ct2f2c97873192592a@mail.gmail.com> > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20/os20.packages.txt is 630 > packages, for comparison the 8.2.1 build log > http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/8.2.1/build802/devel_ext3/build.log > had 402 packages. ?Obviously the new builds have an entire Gnome > desktop, but some areas seemed a bit bloat-ish. > > I see perl. ?Back in 2008 bonobo was pulling in Perl, and I see > bonobo. But there's no more gnome-python2-bonobo, so what requires > bonobo? ?Maybe there are unfixed packaging issues from > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Distro_version_migration_nastiness > > 8.2.1 had no man/pod/info pages, but I see ghostscript, groff, rarian, etc. > > There's matchbox and metacity, I thought Sugar was switching to Metacity? > > etc. ?No worries, I'm just curious. there are no perl deps on on the gnome stack any more. I filed around 20 odd bugs to fix that up. The only package that currently pulls in perl if you do a "yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop Environment'" the only thing that pulls perl in is the CD burning stuff which obviously isn't required on the XO. I'll try and run one up in a VM over the weekend and send a patch to cleanup some of the deps. I run my eeePC 901 with a full gnome, sugar and moblin desktop and still no perl :-) With regards to the bonobo requirement that will come from evolution and gconf as they still require it (for the moment). Peter From sayamindu at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 13:09:10 2009 From: sayamindu at gmail.com (Sayamindu Dasgupta) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:39:10 +0530 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0907170606k75c6784ct2f2c97873192592a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0907170606k75c6784ct2f2c97873192592a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20/os20.packages.txt is 630 >> packages, for comparison the 8.2.1 build log >> http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/8.2.1/build802/devel_ext3/build.log >> had 402 packages. ?Obviously the new builds have an entire Gnome >> desktop, but some areas seemed a bit bloat-ish. >> >> I see perl. ?Back in 2008 bonobo was pulling in Perl, and I see >> bonobo. But there's no more gnome-python2-bonobo, so what requires >> bonobo? ?Maybe there are unfixed packaging issues from >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Distro_version_migration_nastiness >> >> 8.2.1 had no man/pod/info pages, but I see ghostscript, groff, rarian, etc. >> >> There's matchbox and metacity, I thought Sugar was switching to Metacity? >> >> etc. ?No worries, I'm just curious. > > there are no perl deps on on the gnome stack any more. I filed around > 20 odd bugs to fix that up. The only package that currently pulls in > perl if you do a "yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop Environment'" the > only thing that pulls perl in is the CD burning stuff which obviously > isn't required on the XO. I'll try and run one up in a VM over the > weekend and send a patch to cleanup some of the deps. I run my eeePC > 901 with a full gnome, sugar and moblin desktop and still no perl :-) > > With regards to the bonobo requirement that will come from evolution > and gconf as they still require it (for the moment). > Can't we use Gconf-dbus instead of the normal GConf ? Thanks, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] From pbrobinson at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 13:24:56 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:24:56 +0100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0907170606k75c6784ct2f2c97873192592a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907170624p5797f8eqa29e110cf2f39df2@mail.gmail.com> >>> http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20/os20.packages.txt is 630 >>> packages, for comparison the 8.2.1 build log >>> http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/8.2.1/build802/devel_ext3/build.log >>> had 402 packages. ?Obviously the new builds have an entire Gnome >>> desktop, but some areas seemed a bit bloat-ish. >>> >>> I see perl. ?Back in 2008 bonobo was pulling in Perl, and I see >>> bonobo. But there's no more gnome-python2-bonobo, so what requires >>> bonobo? ?Maybe there are unfixed packaging issues from >>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Distro_version_migration_nastiness >>> >>> 8.2.1 had no man/pod/info pages, but I see ghostscript, groff, rarian, etc. >>> >>> There's matchbox and metacity, I thought Sugar was switching to Metacity? >>> >>> etc. ?No worries, I'm just curious. >> >> there are no perl deps on on the gnome stack any more. I filed around >> 20 odd bugs to fix that up. The only package that currently pulls in >> perl if you do a "yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop Environment'" the >> only thing that pulls perl in is the CD burning stuff which obviously >> isn't required on the XO. I'll try and run one up in a VM over the >> weekend and send a patch to cleanup some of the deps. I run my eeePC >> 901 with a full gnome, sugar and moblin desktop and still no perl :-) >> >> With regards to the bonobo requirement that will come from evolution >> and gconf as they still require it (for the moment). >> > > > Can't we use Gconf-dbus instead of the normal GConf ? It wouldn't make any difference as evolution-data-server uses it so it would still be pulled in because its part of the gnome desktop. Even then the difference is not more than a couple of meg. In 6 months or so most of those deps should be gone. Peter From cjb at laptop.org Fri Jul 17 13:58:24 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:58:24 -0400 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> (S. Page's message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:04:17 -0700") References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi, > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20/os20.packages.txt is 630 > packages, for comparison the 8.2.1 build log had 402 packages. Thanks. I'm not worried about this at the moment, since our disk space use is still in a good place -- 380M for Sugar + GNOME + 28 Sugar activities -- and the machines the 1.5 builds are deploying on have at least 4 GiB of space. - Chris. -- Chris Ball From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 17 14:08:20 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:08:20 +0100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <818423da0907170708m4d25daf0s473e0b7756d35f5f@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/17 Chris Ball : > Hi, > > ? > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20/os20.packages.txt is 630 > ? > packages, for comparison the 8.2.1 build log had 402 packages. > > Thanks. ?I'm not worried about this at the moment, since our disk > space use is still in a good place -- 380M for Sugar + GNOME + 28 > Sugar activities -- and the machines the 1.5 builds are deploying > on have at least 4 GiB of space. Disk space usage is much higher - that 380mb is the compressed size, and we don't have fs compression. I think we're at about 1.1gb when on-disk. Daniel From pbrobinson at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 14:25:00 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:25:00 +0100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: <818423da0907170708m4d25daf0s473e0b7756d35f5f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> <818423da0907170708m4d25daf0s473e0b7756d35f5f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907170725l636223a6m3964b7dfbede2d4@mail.gmail.com> >> ? > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os20/os20.packages.txt is 630 >> ? > packages, for comparison the 8.2.1 build log had 402 packages. >> >> Thanks. ?I'm not worried about this at the moment, since our disk >> space use is still in a good place -- 380M for Sugar + GNOME + 28 >> Sugar activities -- and the machines the 1.5 builds are deploying >> on have at least 4 GiB of space. > > Disk space usage is much higher - that 380mb is the compressed size, > and we don't have fs compression. I think we're at about 1.1gb when > on-disk. XO-1.... fail :-) Peter From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 17 15:53:55 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:53:55 +0100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0907170725l636223a6m3964b7dfbede2d4@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> <818423da0907170708m4d25daf0s473e0b7756d35f5f@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0907170725l636223a6m3964b7dfbede2d4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <818423da0907170853t7ade49c1iece636ce19325ad1@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/17 Peter Robinson : > XO-1.... fail :-) It'll be OK on XO-1 since we used a compressed filesystem, I think it'll be 400-500mb on-disk there. Bloaty but it fits... Daniel From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 17 19:29:37 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 21 Message-ID: <20090717192937.26B3712647A@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os21 Compressed image size: 373.97mb (-0.02mb since build 20) Package changes since build 20: -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090716.0546.1.olpc.ee2f419.i586 +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.0115.1.olpc.ba8f22b.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090716.0546.1.olpc.ee2f419.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.0115.1.olpc.ba8f22b.i586 From echerlin at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 20:07:39 2009 From: echerlin at gmail.com (Edward Cherlin) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:07:39 -0700 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 21 In-Reply-To: <20090717192937.26B3712647A@dev.laptop.org> References: <20090717192937.26B3712647A@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os21 > > Compressed image size: 373.97mb (-0.02mb since build 20) Thank you. Can someone document in the Wiki what each variant is for? I know what .iso and .img.gz mean, but not bootable or tree. Is anybody making a .vdi? I like to do testing in VirtualBox. os21.bootable.gz 17-Jul-2009 15:20 380M os21.done 17-Jul-2009 15:20 0 os21.img.gz 17-Jul-2009 15:21 374M os21.iso 17-Jul-2009 15:21 380M os21.packages.txt 17-Jul-2009 15:21 18K os21.tree.tar.lzma 17-Jul-2009 15:22 320M > Package changes since build 20: > > -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090716.0546.1.olpc.ee2f419.i586 > +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.0115.1.olpc.ba8f22b.i586 > -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090716.0546.1.olpc.ee2f419.i586 > +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.0115.1.olpc.ba8f22b.i586 > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > -- Silent Thunder (??/???????????????/????????????? ?) is my name And Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination. http://earthtreasury.org/worknet (Edward Mokurai Cherlin) From pbrobinson at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 20:18:57 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:18:57 +0100 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 21 In-Reply-To: References: <20090717192937.26B3712647A@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907171318n52a31b28h7843453c3694ef4a@mail.gmail.com> >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 >> http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os21 >> >> Compressed image size: 373.97mb (-0.02mb since build 20) > > Thank you. Can someone document in the Wiki what each variant is for? > I know what .iso and .img.gz mean, but not bootable or tree. Is > anybody making a .vdi? I like to do testing in VirtualBox. well you should be able to boot the .iso as a livecd in virtualbox. Not sure if the image includes anaconda. If it does you can run the command 'liveinst' or if its not you can do "yum install -y anaconda; liveinst" Peter From cjb at laptop.org Sat Jul 18 01:18:34 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:18:34 -0400 Subject: Availability of XO-1.5 ATest-2 machines Message-ID: Hi, A small number of XO-1.5 A2 laptops has just arrived at OLPC, so it's time to start up the Contributors' Program for them! If you think you might be able to help us with hardware work, now would be an excellent time to write a mail with the following headers: To: contributors at laptop.org Subject: XO 1.5-A2 laptop proposal letting us know what you think you could help with, mentioning any relevant work you've done in the past, and including your address and phone number for shipping. Some of the areas we'd love help with are: * Xorg driver bughunting * Kernel suspend/resume time measurement and optimization, ACPI integration, and driver work in general * Distro/packaging work that requires a machine We'll have a much larger set of beta-test machines available in the not so far future, so please don't be offended if we don't have enough machines to send you one from our small supply of alpha-test laptops. Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball From skierpage at gmail.com Sat Jul 18 03:41:43 2009 From: skierpage at gmail.com (S Page) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:41:43 -0700 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 20 In-Reply-To: <5256d0b0907170606k75c6784ct2f2c97873192592a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090716215721.CEFA512647A@dev.laptop.org> <6509bebe0907170404n783cd60fyfc679ee44c2cbe2e@mail.gmail.com> <5256d0b0907170606k75c6784ct2f2c97873192592a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6509bebe0907172041lab875f3m8cba93f201ca0bc1@mail.gmail.com> > there are no perl deps on on the gnome stack any more. I filed around > 20 odd bugs to fix that up. <3 XOXO ! > The only package that currently pulls in > perl if you do a "yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop Environment'" the > only thing that pulls perl in is the CD burning stuff which obviously > isn't required on the XO. There's a cdparanoia-libs-10.2-4.fc11.i586 , maybe gstreamer-plugins-XYZ requires cdparanoia-libs requires perl ? There's also a libcdio "provides an interface for CD-ROM access". However ISTR wmb considering adding support for USB CD-ROM drives in firmware, maybe it's useful. Presumably some package doesn't have docs split off and that's what is pulling in ghostview, groff, rarian. -- =S From cjb at laptop.org Mon Jul 20 21:09:57 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:09:57 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 22 Message-ID: <20090720210957.573E112647A@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os22 Compressed image size: 374.04mb (+0.07mb since build 21) Package changes since build 21: -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.0115.1.olpc.ba8f22b.i586 +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.1646.1.olpc.03de1f1.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.0115.1.olpc.ba8f22b.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.1646.1.olpc.03de1f1.i586 From cjb at laptop.org Tue Jul 21 21:13:32 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:13:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 23 Message-ID: <20090721211332.2425FFAB0C@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os23 Compressed image size: 374.10mb (+0.05mb since build 22) Description of changes in this build: As of this build, the internal NAND is /dev/sda rather than /dev/hda. Package changes since build 22: -anacron-2.3-75.fc11.i586 +anacron-2.3-76.fc11.i586 -bind-libs-9.6.1-2.fc11.i586 +bind-libs-9.6.1-3.fc11.i586 -bind-utils-9.6.1-2.fc11.i586 +bind-utils-9.6.1-3.fc11.i586 +control-center-2.26.0-10.fc11.i586 -control-center-2.26.0-9.fc11.i586 +control-center-filesystem-2.26.0-10.fc11.i586 -control-center-filesystem-2.26.0-9.fc11.i586 +csound-5.10.1-9.fc11.i586 +cups-libs-1.4-0.rc1.10.fc11.i586 -cups-libs-1.4-0.rc1.7.fc11.i586 -evolution-data-server-2.26.3-1.fc11.i586 +evolution-data-server-2.26.3-2.fc11.i586 +fltk-1.1.9-4.fc11.i586 -jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1-5.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.1646.1.olpc.03de1f1.i586 +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090717.1646.1.olpc.03de1f1.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 -libfreebob-1.0.11-5.fc11.i586 -libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc11.i586 +libtiff-3.8.2-14.fc11.i586 +mesa-libGLU-7.6-0.1.fc11.i586 -net-tools-1.60-92.fc11.i586 +net-tools-1.60-93.fc11.i586 -olpc-switch-desktop-0.4-1.fc11.noarch +olpc-switch-desktop-0.6-1.fc11.noarch -olpcsound-5.08.92-15.fc11.i386 -python-setuptools-0.6c9-3.fc11.noarch +python-setuptools-0.6c9-4.fc11.noarch -tar-1.22-3.fc11.i586 +tar-1.22-4.fc11.i586 From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 24 05:05:59 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:50:59 +0545 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I just built 2 images of F11-for-XO1 on OLPC infrastructure according to my own instructions. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 The first one is based on the backport that I built and tested before (a few weeks ago), so it will probably work: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os1 and the second one is updated with all of the recent changes that have been happening in XO-1.5 software development, bringing the 2 trees in sync at the present time http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os2 Neither have been tested since the internet connection here in Nepal is very slow - I will download them over the weekend. It would be great if anyone is interested in testing during that time though. I would suggest starting with os2 and falling back on os1 if it doesn't work. I'm still looking for people to take on the role of making these builds on a regular basis - for me, these builds are just a one-off for now. The usual cautions apply: this is development code, there will be bugs. Installation instructions: use copy-nand to install osX.img with osX.crc. Daniel From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 24 12:37:29 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:37:29 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> Tested os2 on XO-1 C2. 0. the boot animation seen with 802 was missing, 1. font size changed on console during boot, but it went back to normal before X started, 2. X and Sugar started fine, 3. the Sugar Neighbourhood view showed only my access point, not the usual three mesh icons, 4. associating with my access point worked fine, 5. starting activities worked; Moon, Maze, Terminal, Speak (audio output worked), Measure (audio input worked), IRC, Browse (googling worked), TamTamMini, and Write. 6. Record only offered Audio input, no camera input, 7. volume control keys worked okay, 8. brightness control keys did nothing, 9. power button did not suspend, 10. screen rotate button caused screen to go black. That's puzzling, I'll try to reproduce. Yep, the screen rotate button causes the screen to go black (unlit, no image), and nothing but a power cycle seems to fix it. Rebooting ... automatically reassociated with access point, other XOs seen in Neighbourhood view. Hope this helps. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 24 17:31:45 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:16:45 +0545 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <818423da0907241031q51f8889bj805ecdd9152f762a@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/24 James Cameron : > Tested os2 on XO-1 C2. Thanks James! All of those except for #0 were as I would expect. I should have os2 downloaded by monday, and hopefully I'll have some spare time to investigate that one at least. > 1. ?font size changed on console during boot, but it went back to normal > before X started, What do you mean by "normal"? I assume it went big-to-small-to-big -- to be expected. On all subsequent boots it will be big. > 3. ?the Sugar Neighbourhood view showed only my access point, not the > usual three mesh icons, Mesh support is not yet present in the newest NetworkManager although we've made a lot of progress. > 6. ?Record only offered Audio input, no camera input, Known (but larlgely uninvestigated) kernel bug for XO-1. > 8. ?brightness control keys did nothing, > 9. power button did not suspend, We're still pondering the implementation of power management, even on XO-1.5. Hence we aren't expecting this to work just yet. > 10. screen rotate button caused screen to go black. ?That's puzzling, I'll > try to reproduce. ?Yep, the screen rotate button causes the screen to go > black (unlit, no image), and nothing but a power cycle seems to fix it. Known X11 geode driver bug. > Hope this helps. Very much so! Cheers Daniel From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 24 22:27:25 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:27:25 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <818423da0907241031q51f8889bj805ecdd9152f762a@mail.gmail.com> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907241031q51f8889bj805ecdd9152f762a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090724222725.GB4414@us.netrek.org> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:16:45PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/7/24 James Cameron : > > 1. ?font size changed on console during boot, but it went back to normal > > before X started, > > What do you mean by "normal"? I assume it went big-to-small-to-big -- > to be expected. On all subsequent boots it will be big. Yes, it went small for a time, on subsequent boots it remained a single size. By the way, manual brightness changes via /sys/devices/platform/dcon/backlight/dcon-bl/brightness worked fine. I don't see ohm running, I guess that's why. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From cjb at laptop.org Fri Jul 24 22:38:22 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:38:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 24 Message-ID: <20090724223822.32D1DFAB0D@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os24 Compressed image size: 374.22mb (+0.13mb since build 23) Description of changes in this build: * Basic suspend/resume works. This build requires >=Q3A06. Package changes since build 23: -at-3.1.10-30.fc11.i586 +at-3.1.10-31.fc11.i586 -binutils-2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11.i586 +binutils-2.19.51.0.2-18.fc11.i586 -cairo-1.8.6-2.fc11.i586 +cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586 -dracut-0.4-1.fc11.i586 +dracut-0.5-1.fc11.i586 -dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.0-1.fc11.i586 +dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.1-1.fc11.i586 -firefox-3.5-1.fc11.i586 +firefox-3.5.1-1.fc11.i586 -gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-7.fc11.i586 +gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-8.fc11.i586 -gstreamer-0.10.23-2.fc11.i586 +gstreamer-0.10.23.3-1.fc11.i586 -gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586 +gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-4.fc11.i586 -gstreamer-tools-0.10.23-2.fc11.i586 +gstreamer-tools-0.10.23.3-1.fc11.i586 -gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-4.fc11.i586 +gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-5.fc11.i586 -gtk2-2.16.4-1.fc11.i586 +gtk2-2.16.5-1.fc11.i586 -hdparm-9.12-1.fc11.i586 +hdparm-9.16-1.fc11.i586 -hulahop-0.4.9-5.fc11.i586 +hulahop-0.4.9-6.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090724.1616.1.olpc.d56ad9b.i586 -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090724.1616.1.olpc.d56ad9b.i586 -lzma-4.32.7-2.fc11.i586 -lzma-libs-4.32.7-2.fc11.i586 -pango-1.24.4-1.fc11.i586 +pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 -rpm-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 +rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 -rpm-libs-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 +rpm-libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 -rpm-python-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 +rpm-python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 -shadow-utils-4.1.2-13.fc11.i586 +shadow-utils-4.1.4.1-4.fc11.i586 -sos-1.8-11.fc11.noarch +sos-1.8-14.fc11.noarch -squeak-vm-3.10.4-4.fc11.i586 +squeak-vm-3.10.5-1.fc11.i586 -tzdata-2009j-1.fc11.noarch +tzdata-2009k-1.fc11.noarch +upstart-0.3.11-1.fc11.i586 -upstart-0.3.9-24.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-11.fc11.1.i586 +xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-12.fc11.i586 -xulrunner-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 +xulrunner-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.i586 -xulrunner-python-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 +xulrunner-python-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.i586 +xz-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 +xz-libs-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 +xz-lzma-compat-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 From luya at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 25 07:19:17 2009 From: luya at fedoraproject.org (Luya Tshimbalanga) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:19:17 -0700 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 24 In-Reply-To: <20090724223822.32D1DFAB0D@dev.laptop.org> References: <20090724223822.32D1DFAB0D@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: <4A6AB1F5.3060403@fedoraproject.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/2009 03:38 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os24 > > Compressed image size: 374.22mb (+0.13mb since build 23) > > Description of changes in this build: > * Basic suspend/resume works. This build requires >=Q3A06. > > Package changes since build 23: > > -at-3.1.10-30.fc11.i586 > +at-3.1.10-31.fc11.i586 > -binutils-2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11.i586 > +binutils-2.19.51.0.2-18.fc11.i586 > -cairo-1.8.6-2.fc11.i586 > +cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586 > -dracut-0.4-1.fc11.i586 > +dracut-0.5-1.fc11.i586 > -dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.0-1.fc11.i586 > +dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.1-1.fc11.i586 > -firefox-3.5-1.fc11.i586 > +firefox-3.5.1-1.fc11.i586 > -gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-7.fc11.i586 > +gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-8.fc11.i586 > -gstreamer-0.10.23-2.fc11.i586 > +gstreamer-0.10.23.3-1.fc11.i586 > -gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586 > +gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-4.fc11.i586 > -gstreamer-tools-0.10.23-2.fc11.i586 > +gstreamer-tools-0.10.23.3-1.fc11.i586 > -gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-4.fc11.i586 > +gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-5.fc11.i586 > -gtk2-2.16.4-1.fc11.i586 > +gtk2-2.16.5-1.fc11.i586 > -hdparm-9.12-1.fc11.i586 > +hdparm-9.16-1.fc11.i586 > -hulahop-0.4.9-5.fc11.i586 > +hulahop-0.4.9-6.fc11.i586 > -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 > +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090724.1616.1.olpc.d56ad9b.i586 > -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 > +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090724.1616.1.olpc.d56ad9b.i586 > -lzma-4.32.7-2.fc11.i586 > -lzma-libs-4.32.7-2.fc11.i586 > -pango-1.24.4-1.fc11.i586 > +pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 > -rpm-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 > +rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 > -rpm-libs-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 > +rpm-libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 > -rpm-python-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 > +rpm-python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 > -shadow-utils-4.1.2-13.fc11.i586 > +shadow-utils-4.1.4.1-4.fc11.i586 > -sos-1.8-11.fc11.noarch > +sos-1.8-14.fc11.noarch > -squeak-vm-3.10.4-4.fc11.i586 > +squeak-vm-3.10.5-1.fc11.i586 > -tzdata-2009j-1.fc11.noarch > +tzdata-2009k-1.fc11.noarch > +upstart-0.3.11-1.fc11.i586 > -upstart-0.3.9-24.fc11.i586 > -xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-11.fc11.1.i586 > +xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-12.fc11.i586 > -xulrunner-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 > +xulrunner-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.i586 > -xulrunner-python-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 > +xulrunner-python-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.i586 > +xz-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 > +xz-libs-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 > +xz-lzma-compat-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list Will it work for XO-1 too? I am going to download it for testing purpose. - -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: luya at fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpqsfIACgkQaS6HaNQHFTlEFQCggUgA+6HDOjhtE9Qj+DT25Owh b4wAn0bV10rbGYpezKyNeaHFCRNFqFcv =KIbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mavrothal at yahoo.com Sat Jul 25 09:09:24 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <653812.54829.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Hi Besides James Cameron's points I'd like to add 1) that 24MB are missing from the memory (top shows 232MB available) and 2) That the fonts in Journal and home-list view are too big Also in GNOME 1) the default buttons are usually black 20 Firefox scales too big Finally installing olpc-kbdshim "solves" the brightens button problem Thanks a lot for the build! From pbrobinson at gmail.com Sat Jul 25 09:39:51 2009 From: pbrobinson at gmail.com (Peter Robinson) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:39:51 +0100 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <653812.54829.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <653812.54829.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5256d0b0907250239y6a4014f3w156c1fd03ec2b39c@mail.gmail.com> > Hi > Besides James Cameron's points I'd like to add > 1) that 24MB are missing from the memory (top shows 232MB available) and This is a known issue, there's a RH bug about it here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487601 Peter From quozl at laptop.org Sat Jul 25 12:45:37 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:45:37 +1000 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 24 In-Reply-To: <4A6AB1F5.3060403@fedoraproject.org> References: <20090724223822.32D1DFAB0D@dev.laptop.org> <4A6AB1F5.3060403@fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: <20090725124537.GB9811@us.netrek.org> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:19:17AM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 07/24/2009 03:38 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os24 > Will it work for XO-1 too? I am going to download it for testing purpose. No, not supposed to. There is an XO-1 build by Daniel Drake mentioned on devel at lists.laptop.org that I've tested on XO-1. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From smparrish at gmail.com Sat Jul 25 15:24:39 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:24:39 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200907251124.39762.smparrish@gmail.com> > Hi, > > I just built 2 images of F11-for-XO1 on OLPC infrastructure according > to my own instructions. > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 > > The first one is based on the backport that I built and tested before > (a few weeks ago), so it will probably work: > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os1 > > and the second one is updated with all of the recent changes that have > been happening in XO-1.5 software development, bringing the 2 trees in > sync at the present time > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os2 > > Neither have been tested since the internet connection here in Nepal > is very slow - I will download them over the weekend. > It would be great if anyone is interested in testing during that time > though. I would suggest starting with os2 and falling back on os1 if > it doesn't work. > > I'm still looking for people to take on the role of making these > builds on a regular basis - for me, these builds are just a one-off > for now. > > The usual cautions apply: this is development code, there will be > bugs. Installation instructions: use copy-nand to install osX.img with > osX.crc. > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list Install went just fine. Have an issue doing Activity updates in Sugar. Looks like the system completes the update, however it then comes back and lists the same Activity as still needing to be updated. I know that with the increased memory/cpu on the XO-1..5 running Firefox is trivial, however with the limited memory of the XO-1, Midori may be a better option. When using Gnome having issues with screen brightness. That's all for now but will keep testing. Steven M. Parrish ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc From sayamindu at gmail.com Sat Jul 25 16:33:13 2009 From: sayamindu at gmail.com (Sayamindu Dasgupta) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:03:13 +0530 Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 24 In-Reply-To: <20090724223822.32D1DFAB0D@dev.laptop.org> References: <20090724223822.32D1DFAB0D@dev.laptop.org> Message-ID: We seem to have pulled in upstream openchrome drivers due to a version bump in the Fedora repos, and hence a garbled screen is displayed after bootup. Workaround : Download and install http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/xo1.5-rpms/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-11.fc11.1.i586.rpm (the --force option is required during installation) -sdg- On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os24 > > Compressed image size: 374.22mb (+0.13mb since build 23) > > Description of changes in this build: > ?* Basic suspend/resume works. ?This build requires >=Q3A06. > > Package changes since build 23: > > -at-3.1.10-30.fc11.i586 > +at-3.1.10-31.fc11.i586 > -binutils-2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11.i586 > +binutils-2.19.51.0.2-18.fc11.i586 > -cairo-1.8.6-2.fc11.i586 > +cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586 > -dracut-0.4-1.fc11.i586 > +dracut-0.5-1.fc11.i586 > -dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.0-1.fc11.i586 > +dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.1-1.fc11.i586 > -firefox-3.5-1.fc11.i586 > +firefox-3.5.1-1.fc11.i586 > -gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-7.fc11.i586 > +gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-8.fc11.i586 > -gstreamer-0.10.23-2.fc11.i586 > +gstreamer-0.10.23.3-1.fc11.i586 > -gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586 > +gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-4.fc11.i586 > -gstreamer-tools-0.10.23-2.fc11.i586 > +gstreamer-tools-0.10.23.3-1.fc11.i586 > -gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-4.fc11.i586 > +gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-5.fc11.i586 > -gtk2-2.16.4-1.fc11.i586 > +gtk2-2.16.5-1.fc11.i586 > -hdparm-9.12-1.fc11.i586 > +hdparm-9.16-1.fc11.i586 > -hulahop-0.4.9-5.fc11.i586 > +hulahop-0.4.9-6.fc11.i586 > -kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 > +kernel-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090724.1616.1.olpc.d56ad9b.i586 > -kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090720.1846.1.olpc.16a9546.i586 > +kernel-firmware-2.6.30_xo1.5-20090724.1616.1.olpc.d56ad9b.i586 > -lzma-4.32.7-2.fc11.i586 > -lzma-libs-4.32.7-2.fc11.i586 > -pango-1.24.4-1.fc11.i586 > +pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 > -rpm-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 > +rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 > -rpm-libs-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 > +rpm-libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 > -rpm-python-4.7.0-2.fc11.i586 > +rpm-python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 > -shadow-utils-4.1.2-13.fc11.i586 > +shadow-utils-4.1.4.1-4.fc11.i586 > -sos-1.8-11.fc11.noarch > +sos-1.8-14.fc11.noarch > -squeak-vm-3.10.4-4.fc11.i586 > +squeak-vm-3.10.5-1.fc11.i586 > -tzdata-2009j-1.fc11.noarch > +tzdata-2009k-1.fc11.noarch > +upstart-0.3.11-1.fc11.i586 > -upstart-0.3.9-24.fc11.i586 > -xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-11.fc11.1.i586 > +xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-12.fc11.i586 > -xulrunner-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 > +xulrunner-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.i586 > -xulrunner-python-1.9.1-1.fc11.i586 > +xulrunner-python-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.i586 > +xz-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 > +xz-libs-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 > +xz-lzma-compat-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.i586 > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] From adric at adric.net Sat Jul 25 16:36:51 2009 From: adric at adric.net (Adric Net) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:36:51 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <200907251124.39762.smparrish@gmail.com> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <200907251124.39762.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <35B16FC5-A832-4CD5-86EF-FABD3458E806@adric.net> Hi all, We (OLPC folks, me) are still trying to find a spot to host the build machine for this so that we can do continuous or daily automated builds for testing. I know it's jumping ahead a bit, but is this (for xo1 or 1.5) going to be updatable with yum? Leaving aside the utility of yum updates for XO in general ... for testing these builds it will be much more possible for testers to pull some updated rpms every day or week than pull 300MiB images and overwrite our device memory every day/week. Especially for the wonderful people in distant lands with slow and unreliable lines. If this was already FAQ'd I do apologise. Thanks, adric On Jul 25, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just built 2 images of F11-for-XO1 on OLPC infrastructure according >> to my own instructions. >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 >> >> The first one is based on the backport that I built and tested before >> (a few weeks ago), so it will probably work: >> http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os1 >> >> and the second one is updated with all of the recent changes that >> have >> been happening in XO-1.5 software development, bringing the 2 trees >> in >> sync at the present time >> http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os2 >> >> Neither have been tested since the internet connection here in Nepal >> is very slow - I will download them over the weekend. >> It would be great if anyone is interested in testing during that time >> though. I would suggest starting with os2 and falling back on os1 if >> it doesn't work. >> >> I'm still looking for people to take on the role of making these >> builds on a regular basis - for me, these builds are just a one-off >> for now. >> >> The usual cautions apply: this is development code, there will be >> bugs. Installation instructions: use copy-nand to install osX.img >> with >> osX.crc. >> >> Daniel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-olpc-list mailing list >> Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > > Install went just fine. > > Have an issue doing Activity updates in Sugar. Looks like the system > completes the update, however it then comes back and lists the same > Activity > as still needing to be updated. > > I know that with the increased memory/cpu on the XO-1..5 running > Firefox is > trivial, however with the limited memory of the XO-1, Midori may be > a better > option. > > When using Gnome having issues with screen brightness. > > That's all for now but will keep testing. > > Steven M. Parrish > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 > http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ > irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list Adric Net adric at adric.net From dsd at laptop.org Sat Jul 25 16:42:59 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:27:59 +0545 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <35B16FC5-A832-4CD5-86EF-FABD3458E806@adric.net> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <200907251124.39762.smparrish@gmail.com> <35B16FC5-A832-4CD5-86EF-FABD3458E806@adric.net> Message-ID: <818423da0907250942u46626437t25f445d32aba1e42@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/25 Adric Net : > We (OLPC folks, me) are still trying to find a spot to host the build > machine for this > so that we can do continuous or daily automated builds for testing. > > I know it's jumping ahead a bit, but is this (for xo1 or 1.5) going to be > updatable with yum? You can use yum to update packages from Fedora, as has always been true with OLPC releases. > Leaving aside the utility of yum updates for XO in general ... for testing > these > builds it will be much more possible for testers to pull some updated rpms > every day or week than pull 300MiB images and overwrite our device memory > every day/week. Especially for the wonderful people in distant lands with > slow and > unreliable lines. The images come with olpc-update and the initramfs is ready to boot our special "versioned layout" filesystem (like 8.2 and previous). However the code to generate the images as the versioned layout is currently disabled because it exposed a bug in OFWs ext2 code. For XO-1 this should be no problem. Perhaps one of the first tasks of our new buildmasters could be to enable and test this. Then the only missing step is to generate output accordingly so that people can run olpc-update to receive updates. In summary, this is not changing from the way that OLPC has previously done things, but we're a couple of small steps away from having the update system fully functional. Daniel From cjb at laptop.org Sat Jul 25 22:10:27 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:10:27 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 25 Message-ID: <20090725221027.9102212647A@dev.laptop.org> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os25 Compressed image size: 374.32mb (+0.09mb since build 24) Description of changes in this build: * The openchrome X driver was broken in last build, should be fixed now. * Added pgf's olpc-kbdshim for brightness control. Package changes since build 24: +olpc-kbdshim-6-4.fc11.i586 -xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-12.fc11.i586 +xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-16.fc11.i586 From mavrothal at yahoo.com Sun Jul 26 08:11:47 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <954338.87430.qm@web65504.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> The Sugar timezone control panel does not set the proper time. Is actually 4 h ahead. This is also true in GNOME. BTW Battery monitor is broken in GNOME (but I guess you know that) From mavrothal at yahoo.com Sun Jul 26 17:48:25 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <513907.18107.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Sun, 7/26/09, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > From: Yioryos Asprobounitis > Subject: Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing > To: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 4:11 AM > The Sugar timezone control panel does > not set the proper time. Is actually 4 h ahead. This is also > true in GNOME. Actually this is because the built is missing ntp. Installing ntp gets the time right. From mavrothal at yahoo.com Sun Jul 26 19:14:02 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <25071.96593.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Also the battery monitor does not update in Sugar and is not working at all in the gnome desktop From gary at garycmartin.com Sun Jul 26 20:58:49 2009 From: gary at garycmartin.com (Gary C Martin) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:58:49 +0100 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> Message-ID: <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> Hi Sebastian, Sorry for reviving the old thread. On 2 Jul 2009, at 23:33, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > S Page wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Martin Dengler> > wrote: >>> I'd suggest you ask sdz to make the .iso that he used to create the >>> .img file. >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Sebastian Dziallas> > wrote: >>> I'm very pleased to announce the first early preview of a new >>> generation >>> of SoaS XO-1 images. >> Sir, could you upload the .iso for this image somewhere, maybe in a >> subdirectory of http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/ ? > > Heh. Well, yeah, I usually would. But I don't have the .iso files > around right now, so that we'd need to rebuild this. In the > meantime, Martin Dengler has done some great work to incorporate > more cool new stuff for the XO-1 into SoaS builds and I'd think > there's a new build coming up soonish... ;) FWIW: My best success so far for an F11/0.84 Sugar install on an XO-1 has been with your June 16th image: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.crc http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.img It did need some tweaking clean-up that I though might be useful for the record, even if there's a better solution to getting F11/0.84 on an XO-1: 1) Minor bump I think you mentioned when announcing devxo-1.img were some build issues that put most pre-installed Activities in the wrong places. Usually the first thing I do with any of these non-OLPC distro build is get all the Activities moved over to ~/Activities; get rid of any symbolic links there; and make sure all the file owners are set correctly for the default user so that Sugar can upgrade/erase/install Activities from its GUI as expected. 2) Tiny, tiny fonts, are quite a usability issue :-) Took me ages to track this one down, lots' of dead ends. Slim correctly has its dpi over-ride commented out: grep dpi /etc/slim.conf #xserver_arguments -dpi 75 ... and X is correctly getting the display information: xdplyinfo | egrep 'resolution|dimensions' dimensions: 1200x900 pixels (152x114 millimeters) resolution: 201x201 dots per inch ... and $SUGAR_SCALING is correct (set by ~/.Xclients): echo $SUGAR_SCALING 100 Solution/hack in the end was to futz with the /etc/X11/Xresources and modify the Xft.dpi to be 150 to get all the text back to sugary readable goodness! Hey I can even play nethack again ;-) NOTE: We may want to expose a similar control as a CP usability option for those who are partially blind or with poor eyesight (the Sugar UI copes pretty well with quite large changes in font sizes). 3) For some reason with this build I noticed Browse wasn't launching. It was failing when python was trying to import gnome, seemed fairly critical :-) Turned out to be missing the various .so and the __init__.py. After copying over the content of /usr/lib/python2.6/site- packages/gtk-2.0/gnome from the Soas-strawberry.iso to the XO-1 (same path), Browse was happy and launching again. 4) Paul Fox's new power scripts were working reasonably well, smooth screen dimming, sleep, shutdown tweaks, lid close. But much too intensive for most use; when otherwise idling it would usually dim, then wake, them dim, then wake (maybe wireless activity?). And, I did find that the XO-1 was intermittently locking up. Rather than sit there, constantly wiggling the cursor to keep things alive, you can use run powed-config -a. You can also edit the default time-outs in / etc/powerd/powerd.conf and find a setting that works for you. There are the usual know issues with audio playback, recording, XO camera support, but nothing unexpected at this point in dev time. If anyone has a better recommendation for getting 0.84 Sugar on an XO, happy to hear it. Perhaps the new F11-for-XO1 build? I've not tried that path myself, having only recently got my current XO 0.84 install adequately tweaked for my testing needs. Sounds like F11-for-XO1 could do with more hands for build testing, would be happy to help if that's the future path recommendation. Regards, --Gary From martin at martindengler.com Sun Jul 26 21:49:47 2009 From: martin at martindengler.com (Martin Dengler) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:49:47 +0100 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> Message-ID: <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> Hi Gary, On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:58:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 2 Jul 2009, at 23:33, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >> Heh. Well, yeah, I usually would. But I don't have the .iso files >> around right now, so that we'd need to rebuild this. In the meantime, >> Martin Dengler has done some great work to incorporate more cool new >> stuff for the XO-1 into SoaS builds and I'd think there's a new build >> coming up soonish... ;) > > FWIW: My best success so far for an F11/0.84 Sugar install on an XO-1 > has been with your June 16th image: > > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.crc > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.img Please please don't let this image last any longer - Sebastien has new ones that are quite close to be ready for testing. Let's bug him for those. Sebastien, can we have another build of devxo? Are you waiting on me? > [Issues: bad activity install location, tiny fonts, wrong Browse > version] These big issues you mention have been addressed. > If anyone has a better recommendation for getting 0.84 Sugar on an XO, > happy to hear it. Perhaps the new F11-for-XO1 build? Right now most feedback on F11-for-XO1 is applicable for SoaS-XO1, and vice-versa. So go for whatever you can get :). > 4) Paul Fox's new power scripts were working reasonably well, smooth > screen dimming, sleep, shutdown tweaks, lid close. But much too > intensive for most use; when otherwise idling it would usually dim, then > wake, them dim, then wake (maybe wireless activity?). Interesting - I hadn't seen this wake -> dim -> wake cycling, even when connected to jabber.sugarlabs.org. Perhaps this is an old issue now addressed (cross fingers). > There are the usual know issues with audio playback, recording, XO > camera support, but nothing unexpected at this point in dev time. Yup - some F11 tickets have been mentioned on this list in the past few days that are applicable (in particular, the camera issue). > Regards, > --Gary Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dsd at laptop.org Mon Jul 27 04:37:50 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:22:50 +0545 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <818423da0907262137m6c7a1d0fm55d576b80c514e34@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/24 James Cameron : > Tested os2 on XO-1 C2. > > 0. ?the boot animation seen with 802 was missing, Fixed for next build From sebastian at when.com Mon Jul 27 17:27:53 2009 From: sebastian at when.com (Sebastian Dziallas) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:27:53 +0200 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> Message-ID: <4A6DE399.5000703@when.com> Hi Gary, thanks a lot for the detailed report and the great feedback! :) Martin Dengler wrote: > Hi Gary, > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:58:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: >> On 2 Jul 2009, at 23:33, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >>> Heh. Well, yeah, I usually would. But I don't have the .iso files >>> around right now, so that we'd need to rebuild this. In the meantime, >>> Martin Dengler has done some great work to incorporate more cool new >>> stuff for the XO-1 into SoaS builds and I'd think there's a new build >>> coming up soonish... ;) >> FWIW: My best success so far for an F11/0.84 Sugar install on an XO-1 >> has been with your June 16th image: >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.crc >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.img > > Please please don't let this image last any longer - Sebastien has new > ones that are quite close to be ready for testing. Let's bug him for > those. > > Sebastien, can we have another build of devxo? Are you waiting on me? Heh. Please continue to bug me... I wanted to build one lately, but couldn't connect to the build machine - I suppose the IPv6 tunnel is down again. I'll try to build one again as soon as possible. It would be great if we could get Martin an account there, though. I'm really looking forward to having resumed SoaS-on-XO builds soonish. In fact, I hope to have joint releases for each target platform in the end for SoaS v2. Cheers, --Sebastian >> [Issues: bad activity install location, tiny fonts, wrong Browse >> version] > > These big issues you mention have been addressed. > >> If anyone has a better recommendation for getting 0.84 Sugar on an XO, >> happy to hear it. Perhaps the new F11-for-XO1 build? > > Right now most feedback on F11-for-XO1 is applicable for SoaS-XO1, and > vice-versa. So go for whatever you can get :). > >> 4) Paul Fox's new power scripts were working reasonably well, smooth >> screen dimming, sleep, shutdown tweaks, lid close. But much too >> intensive for most use; when otherwise idling it would usually dim, then >> wake, them dim, then wake (maybe wireless activity?). > > Interesting - I hadn't seen this wake -> dim -> wake cycling, even > when connected to jabber.sugarlabs.org. Perhaps this is an old issue > now addressed (cross fingers). > >> There are the usual know issues with audio playback, recording, XO >> camera support, but nothing unexpected at this point in dev time. > > Yup - some F11 tickets have been mentioned on this list in the past > few days that are applicable (in particular, the camera issue). > >> Regards, >> --Gary > > Martin From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Jul 28 08:33:50 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <480007.93967.qm@web65505.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> A couple more things The wireless WILL NOT manually disconnect from my modem. Either from the frame or the neighborhood screen. The modem is a PHILIPS CGA5722N/TE with WEP security and MAC filtering on. Also there are some random problems with this build. The computer will shutdown suddenly (and fast)!!! Usually soon after boot and while you give a command or press some key. Once in a right-click at home screen, once in a down-arrow in terminal and another time after issuing the top command in terminal. No idea where to look (next time this happens). Any idea? Please let me know if reporting bugs here (with no clue of or attempt for a solution) is a bad idea. Thx From quozl at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 08:43:41 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:43:41 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <480007.93967.qm@web65505.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <480007.93967.qm@web65505.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090728084341.GO9406@us.netrek.org> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:33:50AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > The computer will shutdown suddenly (and fast)!!! Usually soon after > boot and while you give a command or press some key. Once in a > right-click at home screen, once in a down-arrow in terminal and > another time after issuing the top command in terminal. I confirm that. It happened to me once today, but I had *also* changed to q2e41{a,b} firmware at the same time, so I was waiting for it to happen again, so I could lay the blame on one thing or another. > No idea where to look (next time this happens). Any idea? What firmware version? You could try reproducing it with a network connection carrying kernel messages, in case you can catch some evidence leading to the event. Also, try seeing if it happens at about the time that the battery would reach full charge. I think that's when mine did it. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From danceswithcars at gmail.com Tue Jul 28 10:52:49 2009 From: danceswithcars at gmail.com (DancesWithCars) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <4A6DE399.5000703@when.com> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> <4A6DE399.5000703@when.com> Message-ID: I'll second the desire for all platforms since my first G1G1 XO-1 bit the dust recently, and I can't replace it, not sure about pool lending lib long term availability.. ISO, SOAS, virtualization appliance, XO-1. XO-1.5, source builds, and not sure what people do plan to about distros and platforms besides Fedora? Would make a nice grid/table, don't you think? On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi Gary, > > thanks a lot for the detailed report and the great feedback! :) > > Martin Dengler wrote: >> >> Hi Gary, >> >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:58:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: >>> >>> On 2 Jul 2009, at 23:33, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >>>> >>>> Heh. Well, yeah, I usually would. But I don't have the .iso files >>>> around right now, so that we'd need to rebuild this. In the meantime, >>>> Martin Dengler has done some great work to incorporate more cool new >>>> stuff for the XO-1 into SoaS builds and I'd think there's a new build >>>> coming up soonish... ;) >>> >>> FWIW: My best success so far for an F11/0.84 Sugar install on an XO-1 >>> has been with your June 16th image: >>> >>> ? http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.crc >>> ? http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/devxo-1.img >> >> Please please don't let this image last any longer - Sebastien has new >> ones that are quite close to be ready for testing. ?Let's bug him for >> those. >> >> Sebastien, can we have another build of devxo? ?Are you waiting on me? > > Heh. Please continue to bug me... I wanted to build one lately, but couldn't > connect to the build machine - I suppose the IPv6 tunnel is down again. I'll > try to build one again as soon as possible. > > It would be great if we could get Martin an account there, though. > > I'm really looking forward to having resumed SoaS-on-XO builds soonish. In > fact, I hope to have joint releases for each target platform in the end for > SoaS v2. > > Cheers, > --Sebastian > >>> [Issues: bad activity install location, tiny fonts, wrong Browse >>> version] >> >> These big issues you mention have been addressed. >> >>> If anyone has a better recommendation for getting 0.84 Sugar on an XO, >>> happy to hear it. Perhaps the new F11-for-XO1 build? >> >> Right now most feedback on F11-for-XO1 is applicable for SoaS-XO1, and >> vice-versa. ?So go for whatever you can get :). >> >>> 4) Paul Fox's new power scripts were working reasonably well, smooth >>> screen dimming, sleep, shutdown tweaks, lid close. But much too >>> intensive for most use; when otherwise idling it would usually dim, then >>> wake, them dim, then wake (maybe wireless activity?). >> >> Interesting - I hadn't seen this wake -> ?dim -> ?wake cycling, even >> when connected to jabber.sugarlabs.org. ?Perhaps this is an old issue >> now addressed (cross fingers). >> >>> There are the usual know issues with audio playback, recording, XO >>> camera support, but nothing unexpected at this point in dev time. >> >> Yup - some F11 tickets have been mentioned on this list in the past >> few days that are applicable (in particular, the camera issue). >> >>> Regards, >>> --Gary >> >> Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > -- DancesWithCars leave the wolves behind ;-) From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Jul 28 11:55:02 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <575854.31784.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Tue, 7/28/09, James Cameron wrote: > From: James Cameron > Subject: Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing > To: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 4:43 AM > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:33:50AM > -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > The computer will shutdown suddenly (and fast)!!! > Usually soon after > > boot and while you give a command or press some key. > Once in a > > right-click at home screen, once in a down-arrow in > terminal and > > another time after issuing the top command in > terminal. > > I confirm that.? It happened to me once today, but I > had *also* changed > to q2e41{a,b} firmware at the same time, so I was waiting > for it to > happen again, so I could lay the blame on one thing or > another. > > > No idea where to look (next time this happens). Any > idea? > > What firmware version? q2e41 (since it was originally released). > > You could try reproducing it with a network connection > carrying kernel > messages, in case you can catch some evidence leading to > the event. > The howto of this totally elutes me... > Also, try seeing if it happens at about the time that the > battery would > reach full charge.? I think that's when mine did it. > I _think_ that in all cases was fully charged and short after I unplugged it from the charger. > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > From quozl at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 12:01:22 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:01:22 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <575854.31784.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <575854.31784.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090728120122.GQ9406@us.netrek.org> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:55:02AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > q2e41 (since it was originally released). Thanks. > > You could try reproducing it with a network connection > > carrying kernel > > messages, in case you can catch some evidence leading to > > the event. > > The howto of this totally elutes me... Sorry. 1. change the root password to something you know, (by starting Terminal, then become root, then type "passwd" and follow the prompts), 2. determine the IP address, (by ensuring it is associated with an access point and then use "ifconfig -a" to see the IP address), 3. from another system, "ssh root@${IP} tail -f /var/log/messages" where ${IP} is the IP address from step 2, 4. answer the password prompt, watch the display on the other system, and try to reproduce the problem. I'm trying this now. It hasn't worked, in that it hasn't suddenly powered down while I do this tail. I wonder if it is causing whatever is going wrong to not go wrong. > > Also, try seeing if it happens at about the time that the > > battery would > > reach full charge.? I think that's when mine did it. > > > > I _think_ that in all cases was fully charged and short after I > unplugged it from the charger. Thanks, no pattern then. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Jul 28 12:23:07 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <773455.55856.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> -- On Tue, 7/28/09, James Cameron wrote: > > > You could try reproducing it with a network > connection > > > carrying kernel > > > messages, in case you can catch some evidence > leading to > > > the event. > > > > The howto of this totally elutes me... > > Sorry. > > 1.? change the root password to something you know, > (by starting > Terminal, then become root, then type "passwd" and follow > the prompts), > > 2.? determine the IP address, (by ensuring it is > associated with an > access point and then use "ifconfig -a" to see the IP > address), > > 3.? from another system, "ssh root@${IP} tail -f > /var/log/messages" > where ${IP} is the IP address from step 2, > > 4.? answer the password prompt, watch the display on > the other system, > and try to reproduce the problem. > > I'm trying this now.? It hasn't worked, in that it > hasn't suddenly > powered down while I do this tail.? I wonder if it is > causing whatever > is going wrong to not go wrong. Thanks I'll try it. > > > > Also, try seeing if it happens at about the time > that the > > > battery would > > > reach full charge.? I think that's when mine did > it. > > > > > > > I _think_ that in all cases was fully charged and > short after I > > unplugged it from the charger. > > Thanks, no pattern then. > Is not a common event. In the 4 days that I'm using os2 happened only 3 times. The only common thing is that happens shortly after you reboot and get a (usable) home screen (within the first ~1 min). Like something is still running in the background and you get some conflict. From quozl at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 12:39:02 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:39:02 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <773455.55856.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <773455.55856.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090728123902.GV9406@us.netrek.org> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:23:07AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Is not a common event. In the 4 days that I'm using os2 happened only > 3 times. The only common thing is that happens shortly after you > reboot and get a (usable) home screen (within the first ~1 min). > Like something is still running in the background and you get some > conflict. Are you, like me, seeing jffs2 related errors from the kernel around this time? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From pgf at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 13:44:53 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:44:53 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <773455.55856.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (sfid-20090728_082408_544254_4AE4C8E7) References: <773455.55856.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (sfid-20090728_082408_544254_4AE4C8E7) Message-ID: <6190.1248788693@foxharp.boston.ma.us> yioryos wrote: > > -- On Tue, 7/28/09, James Cameron wrote: > > > > > You could try reproducing it with a network > > connection > > > > carrying kernel > > > > messages, in case you can catch some evidence > > leading to > > > > the event. > > > > > > The howto of this totally elutes me... while james' method will work, i think that in this case it would be easier to simply make the logs persistent, so that they're available at the next startup. 1) create the directory /home/olpc/log 2) save a backup copy of /etc/rsyslog.conf 3) edit /etc/rsyslog.conf, and change "/var/log/messages" to "/home/olpc/log/messages". you can change other occurrences of "/var/log" as well, but the messages file is most likely to be interesting. 4) to make the changes take effect, simply reboot, or, perhaps safer: "kill -HUP $(pidof rsyslogd)". after doing this, verify that you're now getting log data in the new location. NOTE! eventually your logfile(s) _will_ grow too big. after debugging this you'll want to either a) switch back to the original rsyslog.conf, or move the /home/olpc/log/messages file out of the way and repeat step 4, above. when you say "The computer will shutdown suddenly (and fast)", do you mean that the normal splash screen(s) don't appear? if so, which? i'm actually not clear on which images you're testing: are these sebastian's SoaS-on-XO, or is this something based on daniel drake's tree? if the former, and if the shutdown, or crash, is reproducible, please disable powerd: sudo initctl stop powerd sudo mv /etc/event.d/power /home/olpc/powerd.save and retry. paul > > > > Sorry. > > > > 1.? change the root password to something you know, > > (by starting > > Terminal, then become root, then type "passwd" and follow > > the prompts), > > > > 2.? determine the IP address, (by ensuring it is > > associated with an > > access point and then use "ifconfig -a" to see the IP > > address), > > > > 3.? from another system, "ssh root@${IP} tail -f > > /var/log/messages" > > where ${IP} is the IP address from step 2, > > > > 4.? answer the password prompt, watch the display on > > the other system, > > and try to reproduce the problem. > > > > I'm trying this now.? It hasn't worked, in that it > > hasn't suddenly > > powered down while I do this tail.? I wonder if it is > > causing whatever > > is going wrong to not go wrong. > > Thanks I'll try it. > > > > > > > Also, try seeing if it happens at about the time > > that the > > > > battery would > > > > reach full charge.? I think that's when mine did > > it. > > > > > > > > > > I _think_ that in all cases was fully charged and > > short after I > > > unplugged it from the charger. > > > > Thanks, no pattern then. > > > > Is not a common event. In the 4 days that I'm using os2 happened only 3 times. > The only common thing is that happens shortly after you reboot and get a > (usable) home screen (within the first ~1 min). > Like something is still running in the background and you get some conflict. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Jul 28 14:09:59 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <22792.53096.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> I have a hard time reproducing in it in any reliable way. By the time I open a terminal to check the IP is too late. I managed to do it once right after boot and I attache the relevant /var/log/messages segment You are welcome to the entire 1.9MG messages file! You may be able to fish-out the other 3 instances :-) --- On Tue, 7/28/09, James Cameron wrote: > From: James Cameron > Subject: Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 8:39 AM > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:23:07AM > -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > Is not a common event. In the 4 days that I'm using > os2 happened only > > 3 times. The only common thing is that happens shortly > after you > > reboot and get a (usable) home screen (within the > first ~1 min). > > Like something is still running in the background and > you get some > > conflict. > > Are you, like me, seeing jffs2 related errors from the > kernel around > this time? > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: messages.txt URL: From pgf at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 14:27:35 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:27:35 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <22792.53096.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (sfid-20090728_101056_902191_5609186A) References: <22792.53096.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (sfid-20090728_101056_902191_5609186A) Message-ID: <9877.1248791255@foxharp.boston.ma.us> yioryos wrote: > I have a hard time reproducing in it in any reliable way. > By the time I open a terminal to check the IP is too late. > I managed to do it once right after boot and I attache the relevant > /var/log/messages segment > You are welcome to the entire 1.9MG messages file! You may be able to fish-out > the other 3 instances :-) yioryos -- can you list exactly what version(s) of s/w you're running? i've just read the whole thread, and i think i see that you have: daniel's F11-for-XO announced on 24 july. you said on the list you've installed olpc-kbdshim -- from yum? the log you attached shows that you're running powerd. which version? powerd is still experimental, in many respects, and that's certainly true on F11. while i'm happy to help you debug this -- to either prove or disprove that powerd is at fault -- it's probably a good idea to make it clear to the list when you're not running the same release as everyone else. :-) all that being said, it seems that the shutdown commences in your attached log at 16:28:26. powerd would have logged that it was commencing shutdown, so i suspect something else. paul > > --- On Tue, 7/28/09, James Cameron wrote: > > > From: James Cameron > > Subject: Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing > > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > > Cc: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > > Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 8:39 AM > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:23:07AM > > -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > > Is not a common event. In the 4 days that I'm using > > os2 happened only > > > 3 times. The only common thing is that happens shortly > > after you > > > reboot and get a (usable) home screen (within the > > first ~1 min). > > > Like something is still running in the background and > > you get some > > > conflict. > > > > Are you, like me, seeing jffs2 related errors from the > > kernel around > > this time? > > > > -- > > James Cameron > > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > > > > > part 2 text/plain 40K > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: imklog 3.22.1, log source = /proc/kmsg > started. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version > 2.6.30_xo1-20090720.1835.1.olpc.16a9546 (dilinger at fc6.laptop.org) (gcc version > 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-27)) #1 PREEMPT Mon Jul 20 18:41:19 EDT 2009 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] AMD AuthenticAMD > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] NSC Geode by NSC > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Cyrix CyrixInstead > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Centaur CentaurHauls > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Transmeta GenuineTMx86 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Transmeta TransmetaCPU > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] UMC UMC UMC UMC > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e801: 0000000000000000 - > 000000000009f000 (usable) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e801: 0000000000100000 - > 000000000ec00000 (usable) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] DMI 2.1 present. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0xec00 max_arch_pfn > = 0x100000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: > 0000000000000000-000000000ec00000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] 236MB LOWMEM available. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] mapped low ram: 0 - 0ec00000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] low ram: 0 - 0ec00000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] node 0 low ram: 00000000 - > 0ec00000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] node 0 bootmap 00001000 - > 00002d80 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] (5 early reservations) ==> > bootmem [0000000000 - 000ec00000] > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] > BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000] > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] #1 [0000400000 - 00008820f0] > TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000400000 - 00008820f0] > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] #2 [000009f000 - 0000100000] > BIOS reserved ==> [000009f000 - 0000100000] > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] #3 [0000883000 - 00008860cc] > BRK ==> [0000883000 - 00008860cc] > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] #4 [0000001000 - 0000003000] > BOOTMAP ==> [0000001000 - 0000003000] > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Zone PFN ranges: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] DMA 0x00000000 -> > 0x00001000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Normal 0x00001000 -> > 0x0000ec00 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Movable zone start PFN for > each node > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] early_node_map[2] active PFN > ranges > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] 0: 0x00000000 -> 0x0000009f > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] 0: 0x00000100 -> 0x0000ec00 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Allocating PCI resources > starting at 10000000 (gap: ec00000:f1400000) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Built 1 zonelists in Zone > order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 59847 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: ro > root=mtd0 rootfstype=jffs2 console=tty0 fbcon=font:SUN12x22 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Initializing CPU#0 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] NR_IRQS:16 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 1024 > (order: 10, 4096 bytes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Fast TSC calibration using PIT > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.000000] Detected 497.486 MHz processor. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] Console: colour EGA 80x25 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] console [tty0] enabled > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] Dentry cache hash table > entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] Inode-cache hash table > entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] allocated 1208320 bytes of > page_cgroup > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] please try > cgroup_disable=memory option if you don't want > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] Memory: 233052k/241664k > available (2666k kernel code, 7976k reserved, 1049k data, 228k init, 0k highmem) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] virtual kernel memory layout: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] fixmap : 0xfffec000 - > 0xfffff000 ( 76 kB) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] vmalloc : 0xcf400000 - > 0xfffea000 ( 779 MB) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] lowmem : 0xc0000000 - > 0xcec00000 ( 236 MB) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] .init : 0xc07a3000 - > 0xc07dc000 ( 228 kB) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] .data : 0xc069ab6a - > 0xc07a1020 (1049 kB) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] .text : 0xc0400000 - > 0xc069ab6a (2666 kB) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] Checking if this processor > honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010000] ODEBUG: selftest passed > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010021] Calibrating delay loop > (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 994.97 BogoMIPS > (lpj=4974860) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.010815] Security Framework initialized > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.011080] Mount-cache hash table > entries: 512 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.012814] Initializing cgroup subsys ns > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.012903] Initializing cgroup subsys > cpuacct > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.012997] Initializing cgroup subsys > memory > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.013237] Initializing cgroup subsys > devices > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.013360] CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (32 > bytes/line), D cache 64K (32 bytes/line) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.013461] CPU: L2 Cache: 128K (32 > bytes/line) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.013565] CPU: Geode(TM) Integrated > Processor by AMD PCS stepping 02 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.013795] Checking 'hlt' instruction... > OK. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.052092] khelper used greatest stack > depth: 3332 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.053564] net_namespace: 1044 bytes > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.054550] NET: Registered protocol > family 16 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.054760] geode-mfgpt: 8 MFGPT timers > available. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.054847] geode-mfgpt: Registered timer > 0 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.054967] mfgpt-timer: Registering > MFGPT timer 0 as a clock event, using IRQ 7 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.055526] OLPC board with OpenFirmware > CL1 Q2E41 Q2E > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.057728] OLPC board revision C2 (EC=55) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.060000] khelper used greatest stack > depth: 3280 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.062032] khelper used greatest stack > depth: 3140 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.063761] PCI: Using configuration type > OLPC > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.134776] bio: create slab at 0 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.141291] SCSI subsystem initialized > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.147477] PCI: Probing PCI hardware > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.149279] pci 0000:00:0c.1: PME# > supported from D0 D3hot > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.149376] pci 0000:00:0c.1: PME# disabled > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.150531] pci 0000:00:0f.4: PME# > supported from D0 D3hot D3cold > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.150628] pci 0000:00:0f.4: PME# disabled > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.150844] pci 0000:00:0f.5: PME# > supported from D0 D3hot D3cold > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.150941] pci 0000:00:0f.5: PME# disabled > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.171846] NET: Registered protocol > family 2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.172377] IP route cache hash table > entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.173712] TCP established hash table > entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" > swVersion="3.22.1" x-pid="1112" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com"] (re)start > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.174258] TCP bind hash table entries: > 8192 (order: 5, 163840 bytes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.174938] TCP: Hash tables configured > (established 8192 bind 8192) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.175034] TCP reno registered > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.175643] NET: Registered protocol > family 1 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] ------------[ cut here > ]------------ > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:487 > sysfs_add_one+0xbe/0xd3() > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] Hardware name: XO > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] sysfs: cannot create duplicate > filename '/devices/platform/rtc_cmos' > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] Modules linked in: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not > tainted 2.6.30_xo1-20090720.1835.1.olpc.16a9546 #1 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] Call Trace: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x77 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > sysfs_add_one+0xbe/0xd3 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > create_dir+0x43/0x71 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > sysfs_create_dir+0x2d/0x41 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kobject_add_internal+0xad/0x151 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kobject_add_varg+0x35/0x41 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kobject_add+0x49/0x4f > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > device_add+0xf8/0x489 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > __insert_resource+0x1d/0xaa > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > _write_unlock+0x12/0x26 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > platform_device_add+0xd3/0x113 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > platform_device_register+0x15/0x18 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > add_rtc_cmos+0xe/0x31 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] _stext+0x49/0x10b > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > add_rtc_cmos+0x0/0x31 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > create_proc_entry+0x6d/0x81 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > register_irq_proc+0x6a/0x83 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kernel_init+0x6b/0xb9 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > kernel_init+0x0/0xb9 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] ---[ end trace > a7919e7f17c0a725 ]--- > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] kobject_add_internal failed > for rtc_cmos with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in > the same directory. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Tainted: > G W 2.6.30_xo1-20090720.1835.1.olpc.16a9546 #1 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] Call Trace: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kobject_add_internal+0x119/0x151 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kobject_add_varg+0x35/0x41 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kobject_add+0x49/0x4f > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > device_add+0xf8/0x489 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > __insert_resource+0x1d/0xaa > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > _write_unlock+0x12/0x26 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > platform_device_add+0xd3/0x113 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > platform_device_register+0x15/0x18 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > add_rtc_cmos+0xe/0x31 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] _stext+0x49/0x10b > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > add_rtc_cmos+0x0/0x31 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > create_proc_entry+0x6d/0x81 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > register_irq_proc+0x6a/0x83 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kernel_init+0x6b/0xb9 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] ? > kernel_init+0x0/0xb9 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.180009] [] > kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.187014] platform rtc_cmos: registered > platform RTC device (no PNP device found) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.193881] input: OLPC PM as > /devices/virtual/input/input0 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.194968] input: OLPC lid switch as > /devices/virtual/input/input1 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.196092] input: OLPC ebook switch as > /devices/virtual/input/input2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.197200] input: OLPC AC power jack as > /devices/virtual/input/input3 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.197303] SCI is mapped to IRQ 3 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.252699] HugeTLB registered 4 MB page > size, pre-allocated 0 pages > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.253577] VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.253783] Dquot-cache hash table > entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.255526] JFFS2 version 2.2. (NAND) > (SUMMARY) ???? 2001-2006 Red Hat, Inc. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.346593] PROM: Built device tree with > 36749 bytes of memory. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.346814] msgmni has been set to 455 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.347735] cryptomgr_test used greatest > stack depth: 3120 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.348149] cryptomgr_test used greatest > stack depth: 3008 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.350383] cryptomgr_test used greatest > stack depth: 2800 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.350383] alg: No test for stdrng (krng) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.350383] io scheduler noop registered > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.350383] io scheduler cfq registered > (default) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.357885] lxfb 0000:00:01.1: 16384 KB of > video memory at 0xfd000000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.419574] Console: switching to colour > frame buffer device 100x40 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.460884] fb0: Geode LX frame buffer > device > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.518634] Non-volatile memory driver v1.3 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.519268] AMD Geode RNG detected > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.520647] Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 1 > ports, IRQ sharing enabled > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.807094] serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 > (irq = 4) is a NS16550A > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.837173] brd: module loaded > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.838272] Driver 'sd' needs updating - > please use bus_type methods > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.847831] NAND device: Manufacturer ID: > 0xad, Chip ID: 0xdc (Hynix NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.848985] 2 NAND chips detected > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.855073] cmdlinepart partition parsing > not available > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.855862] Searching for RedBoot > partition table in NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit at offset 0x0 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.860199] No RedBoot partition table > detected in NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.881700] serio: i8042 KBD port at > 0x60,0x64 irq 1 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.882409] serio: i8042 AUX port at > 0x60,0x64 irq 12 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.890917] rtc_cmos rtc_cmos: rtc core: > registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.902152] rtc0: alarms up to one year, > y3k, 242 bytes nvram > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.916427] olpc-dcon: Discovered DCON > version 2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.933022] Linux video capture interface: > v2.00 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.947567] Marvell M88ALP01 'CAFE' Camera > Controller version 2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.961072] cafe1000-ccic 0000:00:0c.2: > enabling device (0000 -> 0002) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 0.983880] input: AT Translated Set 2 > keyboard as /devices/platform/i8042/serio0/input/input4 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.193306] ov7670 1-0042: chip found @ > 0x84 (cafe_ccic) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.275757] psmouse serio1: OLPC touchpad > revision 0x50 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.339913] geode-mfgpt: Registered timer > 1 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.357312] cpuidle: using governor ladder > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.374243] cpuidle: using governor menu > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.391934] sdhci: Secure Digital Host > Controller Interface driver > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.409848] sdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre > Ossman > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.428281] sdhci-pci 0000:00:0c.1: SDHCI > controller found [11ab:4101] (rev 10) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.447684] sdhci-pci 0000:00:0c.1: > enabling device (0000 -> 0002) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.467364] sdhci-pci 0000:00:0c.1: > Invalid iomem size. You may experience problems. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.488875] Registered led device: mmc0:: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.510412] mmc0: SDHCI controller on PCI > [0000:00:0c.1] using DMA > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.533702] Error allocating fallback algo > aes > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.555688] alg: cipher: Failed to load > transform for geode-aes: -2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.582781] Error allocating fallback algo > ecb(aes) > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.604936] alg: skcipher: Failed to load > transform for ecb-aes-geode: -2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.627901] geode-aes: GEODE AES engine > enabled. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.656117] Advanced Linux Sound > Architecture Driver Version 1.0.20. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.684090] Failure reading codec reg > 0x7e,Last value=0x7e805368 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.707178] Failure reading codec reg > 0x7e,Last value=0x7e805368 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.743220] ALSA device list: > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.765413] #0: CS5535 Audio cs5535audio > at 0x1480, irq 5 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.787956] TCP bic registered > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.809261] Initializing XFRM netlink > socket > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.831171] NET: Registered protocol > family 10 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.853846] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.874941] Mobile IPv6 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.895035] NET: Registered protocol > family 17 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.936434] mmc0: new high speed SDHC card > at address b368 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.958936] input: OLPC HGPK ALPS HGPK as > /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input5 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 1.981619] mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 SDC 3.72 > GiB > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 2.003505] mmcblk0: p1 p2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 7.715716] JFFS2 notice: (1) > jffs2_build_xattr_subsystem: complete building xattr subsystem, 0 of xdatum (0 > unchecked, 0 orphan) and 0 of xref (0 dead, 0 orphan) found. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 7.761959] VFS: Mounted root (jffs2 > filesystem) readonly on device 31:0. > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 7.784455] Freeing unused kernel memory: > 228k freed > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 7.806987] Write protecting the kernel > text: 2668k > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 7.828539] Write protecting the kernel > read-only data: 836k > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 8.737244] sh used greatest stack depth: > 2704 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 9.230146] modprobe used greatest stack > depth: 2408 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 9.288188] runlevel used greatest stack > depth: 2352 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 9.947175] usbcore: registered new > interface driver usbfs > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 9.969546] usbcore: registered new > interface driver hub > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 10.020869] usbcore: registered new device > driver usb > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.129141] ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host > Controller (OHCI) Driver > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.129397] ohci_hcd 0000:00:0f.4: OHCI > Host Controller > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.130023] ohci_hcd 0000:00:0f.4: new USB > bus registered, assigned bus number 1 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.130157] ohci_hcd 0000:00:0f.4: irq 10, > io mem 0xfe01a000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.427669] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' > Host Controller (EHCI) Driver > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.427692] Warning! ehci_hcd should > always be loaded before uhci_hcd and ohci_hcd, not after > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.542734] usb usb1: configuration #1 > chosen from 1 choice > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.544270] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.544372] hub 1-0:1.0: 4 ports detected > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.550143] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0f.5: EHCI > Host Controller > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.550143] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0f.5: new USB > bus registered, assigned bus number 2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.557921] mice: PS/2 mouse device common > for all mice > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.570636] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0f.5: irq 10, > io mem 0xfe01b000 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.593692] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0f.5: USB 2.0 > started, EHCI 1.00 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.594694] usb usb2: configuration #1 > chosen from 1 choice > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.595158] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.595246] hub 2-0:1.0: 4 ports detected > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 13.916839] usb 2-1: new high speed USB > device using ehci_hcd and address 2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 14.071319] usb 2-1: configuration #1 > chosen from 1 choice > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 17.110748] lib80211: common routines for > IEEE802.11 drivers > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 18.689345] usb 2-1: firmware: requesting > usb8388.bin > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 18.725286] loadkeys used greatest stack > depth: 2340 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 19.259559] ip used greatest stack depth: > 1732 bytes left > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 19.713971] usb8xxx: Firmware ready event > received > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 19.729380] libertas: 00:17:c4:11:ea:51, > fw 5.110.22p23, cap 0x000003a3 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 19.740512] libertas: eth0: Marvell WLAN > 802.11 adapter > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 19.742979] libertas: PREP_CMD: command > 0x0074 failed: 2 > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 19.743000] usb8xxx: Firmware does not > seem to support PS mode > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 19.743351] usbcore: registered new > interface driver usb8xxx > Jul 28 16:27:18 localhost kernel: [ 21.727715] Adding 258040k swap on > /dev/mmcblk0p2. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:258040k SS > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Found user 'avahi' (UID 498) and > group 'avahi' (GID 493). > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Successfully dropped root > privileges. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: avahi-daemon 0.6.25 starting up. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: WARNING: No NSS support for mDNS > detected, consider installing nss-mdns! > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Successfully called chroot(). > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Successfully dropped remaining > capabilities. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Loading service file > /services/ssh.service. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: System host name is set to > 'localhost'. This is not a suitable mDNS host name, looking for alternatives. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Network interface enumeration > completed. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Registering HINFO record with > values 'I586'/'LINUX'. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Server startup complete. Host > name is linux.local. Local service cookie is 1672861058. > Jul 28 16:27:19 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Service "linux" > (/services/ssh.service) successfully established. > Jul 28 16:27:22 localhost olpc-kbdshim-hal[1246]: starting olpc-kbdshim-hal > version 6 > Jul 28 16:27:23 localhost kernel: [ 29.272287] JFFS2 warning: (1255) > jffs2_sum_write_data: Not enough space for summary, padsize = -717 > Jul 28 16:27:23 localhost olpc-kbdshim-hal[1246]: matched local pointer > /dev/input/event5 (11:02:0d) > Jul 28 16:27:23 localhost kernel: [ 29.492196] input: olpc-kbdshim virtual > input as /devices/virtual/input/input6 > Jul 28 16:27:23 localhost olpc-kbdshim-hal[1246]: matched local keyboard > /dev/input/event4 (11:01:01) > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: starting... > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: nm_generic_enable_loopback(): > error -17 returned from rtnl_addr_add():#012Sucess#012 > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): driver supports SSID > scans (scan_capa 0x01). > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): new 802.11 WiFi > device (driver: 'usb') > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): exported as > /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/net_00_17_c4_11_ea_51_0 > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): driver supports SSID > scans (scan_capa 0x01). > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): new 802.11 WiFi > device (driver: 'usb') > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): exported as > /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/net_00_17_c4_11_ea_51 > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: (ttyS0): ignoring due to lack > of mobile broadband capabilties > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: Trying to start the > supplicant... > Jul 28 16:27:24 localhost NetworkManager: Trying to start the system > settings daemon... > Jul 28 16:27:25 localhost nm-system-settings: Loaded plugin ifcfg-rh: (c) 2007 > - 2008 Red Hat, Inc. To report bugs please use the NetworkManager mailing list. > Jul 28 16:27:26 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): supplicant manager > state: down -> idle > Jul 28 16:27:26 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): supplicant manager > state: down -> idle > Jul 28 16:27:26 localhost nm-system-settings: ifcfg-rh: parsing > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo ... > Jul 28 16:27:26 localhost ntpd[1316]: ntpd 4.2.4p7 at 1.1607-o Thu May 28 18:55:23 > UTC 2009 (1) > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: precision = 1.966 usec > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: Listening on interface #0 wildcard, > 0.0.0.0#123 Disabled > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: Listening on interface #1 wildcard, > ::#123 Disabled > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: Listening on interface #2 lo, ::1#123 > Enabled > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: Listening on interface #3 lo, > 127.0.0.1#123 Enabled > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: Listening on routing socket on fd #20 for > interface updates > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: kernel time sync status 2040 > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost ntpd[1317]: frequency initialized -494.469 PPM from > /var/lib/ntp/drift > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost olpc-switchd: starting version 8 > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost olpc-switchd: will poll power sources every 10 seconds > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost olpc-switchd: found 4 switches > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost powerd: starting > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost powerd: configuring from /etc/powerd/powerd.conf > Jul 28 16:27:27 localhost powerd: configured to never shutdown while plugged in > Jul 28 16:27:28 localhost olpc-kbdshim-hal[1246]: idle timers set to 120 300 > 7200 > Jul 28 16:27:28 localhost powerd: dim in 120 seconds, sleep in 300, blank in > 7200, then shutdown after 3600 > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): device state change: > 1 -> 2 (reason 2) > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): bringing up device. > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): preparing device. > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): deactivating device > (reason: 2). > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: nm_device_wifi_set_mode(): > error setting card msh0 to mode 2: Operation not supported > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 1 -> 2 (reason 2) > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): bringing up device. > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): preparing device. > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): deactivating device > (reason: 2). > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost kernel: [ 35.098646] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: > link is not ready > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): device state change: > 2 -> 3 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 2 -> 3 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): supplicant interface > state: starting -> ready > Jul 28 16:27:29 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): supplicant interface > state: starting -> ready > Jul 28 16:27:30 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Registering new address record > for fe80::217:c4ff:fe11:ea51 on msh0.*. > Jul 28 16:27:32 localhost ntpd[1317]: Listening on interface #4 msh0, > fe80::217:c4ff:fe11:ea51#123 Enabled > Jul 28 16:27:37 localhost kernel: [ 43.826833] dcon_freeze_store: 0 > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) starting > connection 'Auto CONNX-GM' > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 3 -> 4 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of > 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of > 5 (Device Prepare) started... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of > 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of > 5 (Device Prepare) complete. > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of > 5 (Device Configure) starting... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 4 -> 5 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0/wireless): > access point 'Auto CONNX-GM' has security, but secrets are required. > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 5 -> 6 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of > 5 (Device Configure) complete. > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: update_one_setting(): Failed > to update connection secrets: 2 auth-alg > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of > 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of > 5 (Device Prepare) started... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 6 -> 4 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of > 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of > 5 (Device Prepare) complete. > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of > 5 (Device Configure) starting... > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 4 -> 5 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0/wireless): > connection 'Auto CONNX-GM' has security, and secrets exist. No new secrets > needed. > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Config: added 'ssid' value > 'CONNX-GM' > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Config: added 'scan_ssid' > value '1' > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Config: added 'key_mgmt' > value 'NONE' > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Config: added 'wep_key0' > value '' > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Config: added 'wep_tx_keyidx' > value '0' > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of > 5 (Device Configure) complete. > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: Config: set interface ap_scan > to 1 > Jul 28 16:27:53 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): supplicant connection > state: scanning -> disconnected > Jul 28 16:27:54 localhost kernel: [ 60.800249] fuse init (API version 7.11) > Jul 28 16:27:56 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): supplicant connection > state: disconnected -> scanning > Jul 28 16:27:58 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): supplicant connection > state: scanning -> associating > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost kernel: [ 65.509746] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: > link becomes ready > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): supplicant connection > state: associating -> associated > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): supplicant connection > state: associated -> completed > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0/wireless) > Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) successful. Connected to wireless network > 'CONNX-GM'. > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of > 5 (IP Configure Start) scheduled. > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of > 5 (IP Configure Start) started... > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 5 -> 7 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Beginning > DHCP transaction. > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: dhclient started with pid 1481 > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of > 5 (IP Configure Start) complete. > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client > 4.1.0 > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems > Consortium. > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: All rights reserved. > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: For info, please visit > http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost NetworkManager: DHCP: device eth0 state > changed (null) -> preinit > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: Listening on LPF/eth0/00:17:c4:11:ea:51 > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: Sending on LPF/eth0/00:17:c4:11:ea:51 > Jul 28 16:27:59 localhost dhclient: Sending on Socket/fallback > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port > 67 > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost dhclient: DHCPACK from 192.168.2.1 > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: DHCP: device eth0 state > changed preinit -> reboot > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 4 of > 5 (IP Configure Get) scheduled... > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 4 of > 5 (IP Configure Get) started... > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: address 192.168.2.2 > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: prefix 24 (255.255.255.0) > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: gateway 192.168.2.1 > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: nameserver '192.168.2.1' > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 5 of > 5 (IP Configure Commit) scheduled... > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 4 of > 5 (IP Configure Get) complete. > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 5 of > 5 (IP Configure Commit) started... > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Joining mDNS multicast group on > interface eth0.IPv4 with address 192.168.2.2. > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv4 > for mDNS. > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Registering new address record > for 192.168.2.2 on eth0.IPv4. > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Registering new address record > for fe80::217:c4ff:fe11:ea51 on eth0.*. > Jul 28 16:28:01 localhost dhclient: bound to 192.168.2.2 -- renewal in 503826 > seconds. > Jul 28 16:28:02 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 7 -> 8 (reason 0) > Jul 28 16:28:02 localhost NetworkManager: Policy set 'Auto CONNX-GM' > (eth0) as default for routing and DNS. > Jul 28 16:28:02 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) successful, > device activated. > Jul 28 16:28:02 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 5 of > 5 (IP Configure Commit) complete. > Jul 28 16:28:03 localhost ntpd[1317]: Listening on interface #5 eth0, > 192.168.2.2#123 Enabled > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost init: tty4 main process (1336) killed by TERM signal > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost init: tty5 main process (1339) killed by TERM signal > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost init: tty2 main process (1341) killed by TERM signal > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost init: tty3 main process (1343) killed by TERM signal > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost init: tty6 main process (1344) killed by TERM signal > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost init: ttyS0 main process (1346) killed by TERM signal > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 8 -> 3 (reason 38) > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): deactivating device > (reason: 38). > Jul 28 16:28:26 localhost NetworkManager: eth0: canceled DHCP > transaction, dhcp client pid 1481 > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost NetworkManager: check_one_route(): (eth0) > error -34 returned from rtnl_route_del(): Sucess#012 > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Withdrawing address record for > 192.168.2.2 on eth0. > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on > interface eth0.IPv4 with address 192.168.2.2. > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Interface eth0.IPv4 no longer > relevant for mDNS. > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost init: plymouth-shutdown main process (1628) > terminated with status 1 > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost kernel: [ 93.967982] dcon_freeze_store: 1 > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost kernel: [ 93.968029] dcon_source_switch to DCON > Jul 28 16:28:27 localhost kernel: [ 93.989133] olpc-dcon: The DCON has control > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost avahi-daemon[1135]: Got SIGTERM, quitting. > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: HAL disappeared > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost olpc-kbdshim-hal[1246]: got signal 15 > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost olpc-kbdshim-hal[1246]: exiting -- Resource > temporarily unavailable > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost ntpd[1317]: ntpd exiting on signal 15 > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: nm_signal_handler(): Caught > signal 15, shutting down normally. > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): now unmanaged > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): device state change: > 3 -> 1 (reason 36) > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): cleaning up... > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (msh0): taking down device. > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): now unmanaged > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: > 3 -> 1 (reason 36) > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): cleaning up... > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): taking down device. > Jul 28 16:28:28 localhost NetworkManager: exiting (success) > Jul 28 16:28:29 localhost nm-system-settings: disconnected from the system bus, > exiting. > Jul 28 16:28:29 localhost nm-dispatcher.action: Disconnected from the system > bus, exiting. > part 3 text/plain 162 > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From mavrothal at yahoo.com Tue Jul 28 16:42:42 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <671265.51026.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> > --- On Tue, 7/28/09, Paul Fox > wrote: > > > From: Paul Fox > > Subject: Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for > testing > > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > > Cc: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > > Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 10:27 AM > > yioryos wrote: > >? > I have a hard time reproducing in it in any > reliable > > way. > >? > By the time I open a terminal to check the > IP is too > > late. > >? > I managed to do it once right after boot > and I > > attache the relevant > >? > /var/log/messages segment > >? > You are welcome to the entire 1.9MG > messages file! > > You may be able to fish-out > >? > the other 3 instances :-) > > > > yioryos -- > > > > can you list exactly what version(s) of s/w you're > > running? > > i've just read the whole thread, and i think i see > that > > you > > have: > > ? ? daniel's F11-for-XO announced on 24 july. > Correct. The os2 version. > > > ? ? you said on the list you've installed > > olpc-kbdshim -- from yum? > Correct > > > ? ? the log you attached shows that you're > > running powerd.? which version? > http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/private_rpms/olpc-powerd-8-1.latest.rpm as of 7/24 > > > > > powerd is still experimental, in many respects, and > that's > > certainly > > true on F11.? while i'm happy to help you debug this > > -- to either prove > > or disprove that powerd is at fault -- it's probably a > good > > idea > > to make it clear to the list when you're not running > the > > same > > release as everyone else.? :-) Well I did think of it (!...) so I removed powerd for some time and the problem did occur again. Powerd was on again in this instance a) because did not appear to be related with the sudden shutdown and b) because I'm still trying to see how powerd works. From pgf at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 17:26:38 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:26:38 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <671265.51026.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (sfid-20090728_125646_541892_59B50728) References: <671265.51026.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (sfid-20090728_125646_541892_59B50728) Message-ID: <15516.1248801998@foxharp.boston.ma.us> yioryos wrote: > > Well I did think of it (!...) so I removed powerd for some > time and the problem did occur again. Powerd was on again in > this instance a) because did not appear to be related with the > sudden shutdown and b) because I'm still trying to see how > powerd works. great -- thanks. paul =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From pgf at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 17:55:37 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> (sfid-20090726_175040_801519_DD87309E) References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> (sfid-20090726_175040_801519_DD87309E) Message-ID: <17294.1248803737@foxharp.boston.ma.us> martin wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:58:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: ... > > 4) Paul Fox's new power scripts were working reasonably well, smooth > > screen dimming, sleep, shutdown tweaks, lid close. But much too > > intensive for most use; when otherwise idling it would usually dim, then > > wake, them dim, then wake (maybe wireless activity?). > > Interesting - I hadn't seen this wake -> dim -> wake cycling, even > when connected to jabber.sugarlabs.org. Perhaps this is an old issue > now addressed (cross fingers). powerd will definitely cause this -- it's almost certainly correlated with wake-on-wlan. (i've just been sitting in a meeting, with an IRC client running, watching this effect.) i've fixed it so the screen no longer undims on a wlan wakeup, and it's much less jarring, visually. it'll be in the next release. paul =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From mikus at bga.com Tue Jul 28 18:40:59 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:40:59 -0400 Subject: Record quickly vanishes on new F11-for-XO1 Message-ID: <4A6F463B.80108@bga.com> FYI. I'm not asking for help. Am sharing information in case anyone else encounters a similar situation. I'm running http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os2, updated with 'yum upgrade'. On other F11 builds I'm used to 'Record' coming up without the "Video" tab - but this time 'Record' launched, drew its screen output for a very brief instant, then vanished. The interesting lines in the log are: | The program 'sugar-activity' received an X Window System error. | This probably reflects a bug in the program. | The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'. | (Details: serial 54 error_code 11 request_code 131 minor_code 19) mikus -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Record.log URL: From cjb at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 19:43:38 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:43:38 -0400 Subject: Disk layout for XO-1.5 In-Reply-To: <20090728192244.GB32259@plexity.net> (Deepak Saxena's message of "Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:22:44 -0700") References: <4A6E2761.9040009@laptop.org> <4A6E37F1.8090601@laptop.org> <20090728192244.GB32259@plexity.net> Message-ID: Hi, [adding fedora-olpc-list to CC] > Are we stuck with 1.1GiB or do we think we can reduce that further? Well, there are a few things going on here. We have activities and content (and will probably add more activities and content) that's currently part of the 1.1GiB, but is actually in /home, and isn't going to count towards our "system partition" use. So we need to split that out in our calculations; currently 162MiB of the 1.14GiB used is in /home, so we're actually just under 1GiB. It seems likely that we can reduce the system partition size by one or two hundred MiB without extreme effort, but I haven't looked into where the space is going yet. However, after we do that we're going to want to add more applications, such as OpenOffice, so I wouldn't want to commit to staying under 1GiB for a single system partition. (It wouldn't be necessarily *bad* to use more than that, if the things we're going to add are valuable and we've cut out the cruft we're not actually using.) So, let's go ahead with the discussion about whether we want to use partitions and what they should be called/what filesystems we should use for them, without committing on a size just yet. If one of the fedora-olpc readers could come up with a report listing our installed RPMs by size on disk, that would rock. - Chris. -- Chris Ball From cjb at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 20:27:42 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:27:42 -0400 Subject: Disk layout for XO-1.5 In-Reply-To: (david@lang.hm's message of "Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:11:10 -0700 (PDT)") References: <4A6E2761.9040009@laptop.org> <4A6E37F1.8090601@laptop.org> <20090728192244.GB32259@plexity.net> <4A6F5A31.20205@laptop.org> Message-ID: Hi, >> Another important advantage to partitions is that the existence >> of a boot partition isolates the firmware from changes in the >> filesystem used for the root. > > can you explain this a bit more? Concrete example: if you want to use btrfs on your root filesystem, you must have a separate /boot partition, because no firmware or boot loader (including grub) can yet mount btrfs. -- Chris Ball From quozl at laptop.org Tue Jul 28 23:33:12 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:33:12 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <15516.1248801998@foxharp.boston.ma.us> References: <671265.51026.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <15516.1248801998@foxharp.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: <20090728233312.GE8288@us.netrek.org> I'm also using the F11 for XO1 image, but not using powerd. Today I'll try a few more times to reproduce the symptom with persistent logs. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From echerlin at gmail.com Tue Jul 28 23:50:51 2009 From: echerlin at gmail.com (Edward Cherlin) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:50:51 -0700 Subject: Other distros (was Re: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1) Message-ID: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:52 AM, DancesWithCars wrote: > I'll second the desire for all platforms > since my first G1G1 XO-1 bit the dust recently, > and I can't replace it, not sure about pool > lending lib long term availability.. > > ISO, SOAS, virtualization appliance, XO-1. XO-1.5, > source builds, > and not sure what people do plan to about distros > and platforms besides Fedora? http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Supported_systems Also Beagle boards and the Encore Mobilis (ARM processor). > Would make a nice grid/table, don't you think? Yes, it does. -- Silent Thunder (??/???????????????/????????????? ?) is my name And Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination. http://earthtreasury.org/worknet (Edward Mokurai Cherlin) From adric at adric.net Wed Jul 29 02:21:26 2009 From: adric at adric.net (Adric Net) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:21:26 -0400 Subject: os2 image build fails, dependency troubles Message-ID: <8A24631F-119B-4A2F-A64B-E80C927D4A62@adric.net> Hi folks, Let me know if I can provide more (useful) information: [adric at f11-on-xo-1 output]$ make -f ../Makefile os2.img ... rpm-libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 from F11-updates-testing has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 from F11-updates-testing has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) rpm-python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 from F11-updates-testing has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/imgcreate/errors.py:45: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 return unicode(self.message) Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction : Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) make: *** [os2.iso] Error 1 Adric Net adric at adric.net From gary at garycmartin.com Wed Jul 29 02:28:42 2009 From: gary at garycmartin.com (Gary C Martin) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:28:42 +0100 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <17294.1248803737@foxharp.boston.ma.us> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> (sfid-20090726_175040_801519_DD87309E) <17294.1248803737@foxharp.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: <670B2955-DE29-49C4-808E-D0242B504F55@garycmartin.com> Hi Paul, On 28 Jul 2009, at 18:55, Paul Fox wrote: > martin wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:58:49PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: > ... >>> 4) Paul Fox's new power scripts were working reasonably well, smooth >>> screen dimming, sleep, shutdown tweaks, lid close. But much too >>> intensive for most use; when otherwise idling it would usually >>> dim, then >>> wake, them dim, then wake (maybe wireless activity?). >> >> Interesting - I hadn't seen this wake -> dim -> wake cycling, even >> when connected to jabber.sugarlabs.org. Perhaps this is an old issue >> now addressed (cross fingers). > > powerd will definitely cause this -- it's almost certainly > correlated with wake-on-wlan. (i've just been sitting in a > meeting, with an IRC client running, watching this effect.) i've > fixed it so the screen no longer undims on a wlan wakeup, and > it's much less jarring, visually. it'll be in the next release. Fab thanks. If I had a more formal testing session I would have reported it to you directly, but I've only recently got this XO running with that build to a state that I was able to use more regularly. Incase it rings any bells, thought I'd just mention that screen dimming has now stopped altogether for me. I've reset powerd pref changes back to the default but no luck. It still powers off the screen, but no back-light auto-dimming. The closest I have to narrow things is that I noticed the dimming seemed to stop after I manually adjusted the screen brightness with the keyboard (maybe I tried to adjust it when it was already auto-dimmed, or some such permutation). Regards, --Gary From dsd at laptop.org Wed Jul 29 04:53:23 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:38:23 +0545 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <703AABC7-07B6-47EC-B99F-D0F136B9FE85@gmail.com> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907262137m6c7a1d0fm55d576b80c514e34@mail.gmail.com> <703AABC7-07B6-47EC-B99F-D0F136B9FE85@gmail.com> Message-ID: <818423da0907282153s1b25e0b2j5e38de4900da2efd@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/29 rihoward1 at gmail.com : > Any thoughts on moving from jffs to ubifs ? > Seems like ubifs has really improved in stability recently. I think we are ready to do this without too much hassle - but first let's wait until someone has actually made and published a build and offered some kind of loose commitment to doing this on a regular basis. At that point, the relevant links are: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/UBIFS_on_XO http://wiki.laptop.org/go/UBIFS_initial_experiments I think the only remaining question from the earlier work was about the readings given by df -- but upstream justified that behaviour, so that is no longer an outstanding issue. The work will then be to: - modify the build system to build partitioned images (we need jffs2 for /boot) -- I wonder if this will cause complications given the OLPC versioned filesystem layout... - modify livecd-iso-to-xo to make a ubifs filesystem for the root, and jffs2 for boot - teach dracut how to boot from UBI Daniel From quozl at laptop.org Wed Jul 29 05:52:59 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:52:59 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <1D657D4B-C633-43FF-B841-9A275F9351FF@gmail.com> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <20090724123729.GA21580@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907262137m6c7a1d0fm55d576b80c514e34@mail.gmail.com> <703AABC7-07B6-47EC-B99F-D0F136B9FE85@gmail.com> <818423da0907282153s1b25e0b2j5e38de4900da2efd@mail.gmail.com> <1D657D4B-C633-43FF-B841-9A275F9351FF@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090729055259.GA18839@us.netrek.org> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:13:34PM -0700, rihoward1 at gmail.com wrote: > Wish I knew how to create drivers for OFW so it could boot from UBIFS. Why bother? Do what debxo does and leave OFW a boot partition to deal with, that way you wouldn't need to have UBIFS in OFW. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From smparrish at gmail.com Wed Jul 29 13:23:44 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:23:44 -0400 Subject: os2 image build fails, dependency troubles In-Reply-To: <8A24631F-119B-4A2F-A64B-E80C927D4A62@adric.net> References: <8A24631F-119B-4A2F-A64B-E80C927D4A62@adric.net> Message-ID: <200907290923.45226.smparrish@gmail.com> > Hi folks, > > Let me know if I can provide more (useful) information: > > [adric at f11-on-xo-1 output]$ make -f ../Makefile os2.img > > ... > > rpm-libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 from F11-updates-testing has depsolving > problems > --> Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- > libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) > rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 from F11-updates-testing has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package > rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) > rpm-python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 from F11-updates-testing has depsolving > problems > --> Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- > python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/imgcreate/errors.py:45: > DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of > Python 2.6 > return unicode(self.message) > Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction : Missing > Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- > libs-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) > Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package > rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) > Missing Dependency: liblzma.so.0 is needed by package rpm- > python-4.7.1-1.fc11.i586 (F11-updates-testing) > make: *** [os2.iso] Error 1 > > Adric Net > adric at adric.net > More than likely this is a problem with the mirrors not being in sync. Give it a few hours and try again. Steven M. Parrish ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, #sugar From pgf at laptop.org Wed Jul 29 13:35:00 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:35:00 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090724_010637_767936_B2C15477) References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090724_010637_767936_B2C15477) Message-ID: <12956.1248874500@foxharp.boston.ma.us> daniel wrote: > Hi, > > I just built 2 images of F11-for-XO1 on OLPC infrastructure according > to my own instructions. > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 > > The first one is based on the backport that I built and tested before > (a few weeks ago), so it will probably work: > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os1 > > and the second one is updated with all of the recent changes that have > been happening in XO-1.5 software development, bringing the 2 trees in > sync at the present time > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os2 could someone who is running either, or both, of these images, test the functionality of rtcwake? i've been given some logs of powerd malfunctioning, and it seems that rtcwake successfully suspends the laptop, but it never wakes up -- or, rather, it wakes up for other reasons, but not due the timeout. specifically, try: time rtcwake -m mem -a -s 10 does the system wake up reliably? the output from the 'time' command will probably be stretched a bit -- perhaps by 2 seconds or a little less. but it should be fairly reproducible. paul =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From mavrothal at yahoo.com Wed Jul 29 15:27:56 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <12956.1248874500@foxharp.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: <610692.7683.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Wed, 7/29/09, Paul Fox wrote: > From: Paul Fox > Subject: Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing > To: "fedora-olpc-list" > Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 9:35 AM > daniel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just built 2 images of F11-for-XO1 on OLPC > infrastructure according > > to my own instructions. > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 > > > > The first one is based on the backport that I built > and tested before > > (a few weeks ago), so it will probably work: > > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os1 > > > > and the second one is updated with all of the recent > changes that have > > been happening in XO-1.5 software development, > bringing the 2 trees in > > sync at the present time > > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/f11-xo1/os2 > > > could someone who is running either, or both, of these > images, > test the functionality of rtcwake?? i've been given > some logs of > powerd malfunctioning, and it seems that rtcwake > successfully > suspends the laptop, but it never wakes up -- or, rather, > it wakes > up for other reasons, but not due the timeout. > > specifically, try: > ? ? time rtcwake -m mem -a -s 10 > > does the system wake up reliably?? the output from the > 'time' > command will probably be stretched a bit -- perhaps by 2 > seconds > or a little less.? but it should be fairly > reproducible. > With the os2 installed, it NEVER wakes up on time without user input (and network) > paul > =--------------------- > paul fox, pgf at laptop.org > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > From mavrothal at yahoo.com Wed Jul 29 17:10:48 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown Message-ID: <306304.83153.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Yet another log of random shutdown. In this one as you can see the xo was working for some time, I had turned off powerd and happened as soon as/while I was connecting to an open wifi and tried to open the Browse activity. Given that in my hands the shutdowns are happening usually very soon after boot, eg as soon as/while the xo is connecting to the wifi, I would guess that the problem stems from there. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: mes_after_crash.txt URL: From adric at adric.net Wed Jul 29 17:48:22 2009 From: adric at adric.net (Adric Net) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:48:22 -0400 Subject: os2 image build fails, dependency troubles In-Reply-To: <200907290923.45226.smparrish@gmail.com> References: <8A24631F-119B-4A2F-A64B-E80C927D4A62@adric.net> <200907290923.45226.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Jul 29, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > > More than likely this is a problem with the mirrors not being in > sync. Give > it a few hours and try again. > > > Steven M. Parrish > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 > http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ > irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora- > olpc, #sugar Hi, Hmm. Now I get this, definitely something different: Inserting md5sum into iso image... md5 = 99e03861e6bd82e92af97a666fd1a36a Inserting fragment md5sums into iso image... fragmd5 = 2d712d8f32a57e39ca99daad68493ce33bb9f6aeceb8cbf6b654feaef8ef frags = 20 Setting supported flag to 0 sudo sh ../livecd-iso-to-xo.sh os2.iso os2 Create root filesystem... Copy in filesystem... Make tree tarball... Build jffs2 image... Done. ../livecd-iso-to-xo.sh: line 7: [: missing `]' make: *** [os2.img] Error 2 ##try again ? [adric at f11-on-xo-1 output]$ make -f ../Makefile os2.img make: `os2.img' is up to date. Re: Fedora mirror sync : Is that just a problem because of how early this effort is and how rapidly things are changing? I really want to find a way to automate these builds so that we can test them. oplc- update or yum update are also goals, eventually. Thanks! Adric Net adric at adric.net From smparrish at gmail.com Wed Jul 29 18:10:46 2009 From: smparrish at gmail.com (Steven M. Parrish) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:10:46 -0400 Subject: os2 image build fails, dependency troubles In-Reply-To: References: <8A24631F-119B-4A2F-A64B-E80C927D4A62@adric.net> <200907290923.45226.smparrish@gmail.com> Message-ID: <200907291410.47917.smparrish@gmail.com> > On Jul 29, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > > More than likely this is a problem with the mirrors not being in > > sync. Give > > it a few hours and try again. > > > > > > Steven M. Parrish > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >---------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 > > A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ > > irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora- > > olpc, #sugar > > Hi, > > Hmm. Now I get this, definitely something different: > > Inserting md5sum into iso image... > md5 = 99e03861e6bd82e92af97a666fd1a36a > Inserting fragment md5sums into iso image... > fragmd5 = 2d712d8f32a57e39ca99daad68493ce33bb9f6aeceb8cbf6b654feaef8ef > frags = 20 > Setting supported flag to 0 > sudo sh ../livecd-iso-to-xo.sh os2.iso os2 > Create root filesystem... > Copy in filesystem... > Make tree tarball... > Build jffs2 image... > Done. > ../livecd-iso-to-xo.sh: line 7: [: missing `]' > make: *** [os2.img] Error 2 > > ##try again ? > [adric at f11-on-xo-1 output]$ make -f ../Makefile os2.img > make: `os2.img' is up to date. > > Re: Fedora mirror sync : Is that just a problem because of how early > this effort is and how rapidly things are changing? I really want to > find a way to automate these builds so that we can test them. oplc- > update or yum update are also goals, eventually. > > Thanks! > Adric Net > adric at adric.net > > The mirror sync issue is just because they are doing a push out to the mirrors atm. It should be finished soon. > ../livecd-iso-to-xo.sh: line 7: [: missing `]' > make: *** [os2.img] Error 2 > > ##try again ? > [adric at f11-on-xo-1 output]$ make -f ../Makefile os2.img > make: `os2.img' is up to date. > This is just an error in the bash script. If you look in your output directory you will see your completed builds. Which is why you are also getting the "os2.img is up to date" message Steven M. Parrish ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, #sugar From mavrothal at yahoo.com Wed Jul 29 22:06:14 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <405763.23988.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> The latest incidence with F11-XO1/os2 is that will not get to the Home screen but instead will stay in a white and then black screen. I can get a console and everything seems to work but startx tells me that X is running in another terminal. Through repetitive reboots stays the same. It's probably some file corruption and I'll reinstall, but just in case is something systemic I got var/log/messages and x.org.log attached. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: noGUI.logs.zip Type: application/zip Size: 8185 bytes Desc: not available URL: From quozl at laptop.org Wed Jul 29 22:46:29 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:46:29 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <405763.23988.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <405763.23988.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090729224629.GH9673@us.netrek.org> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:06:14PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > The latest incidence with F11-XO1/os2 is that will not get to the Home > screen but instead will stay in a white and then black screen. I can > get a console and everything seems to work but startx tells me that X > is running in another terminal. Through repetitive reboots stays the > same. Probably the X client programs not starting. Is there an X running in another terminal? Check the process list. Check for children processes of X. > It's probably some file corruption and I'll reinstall, but just in > case is something systemic I got var/log/messages and x.org.log > attached. Reviewed, nothing unusual in them given the symptom. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From quozl at laptop.org Wed Jul 29 22:53:44 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:53:44 +1000 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <12956.1248874500@foxharp.boston.ma.us> References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <12956.1248874500@foxharp.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: <20090729225344.GI9673@us.netrek.org> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:35:00AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote: > specifically, try: > time rtcwake -m mem -a -s 10 > > does the system wake up reliably? No. It does wake on other activity once put into this sleep. /sys/power/wakeup_events/* are all 1, and none of them are rtc. /sys/devices/platform/rtc_cmos/power/wakeup is "enabled" -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From gary at garycmartin.com Thu Jul 30 00:23:07 2009 From: gary at garycmartin.com (Gary C Martin) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:23:07 +0100 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Show Must Go On - SoaS for the XO-1 In-Reply-To: <670B2955-DE29-49C4-808E-D0242B504F55@garycmartin.com> References: <4A389D2F.4010100@when.com> <6509bebe0906170128w6d1987ffu58ac65e6205a8248@mail.gmail.com> <20090617091210.GU28624@ops-13.xades.com> <6509bebe0907011619j3264c2beuff2c177950589ede@mail.gmail.com> <4A4D35B2.9010502@when.com> <7F3051E0-609F-4974-9424-1270E6B5B30B@garycmartin.com> <20090726214947.GH23393@ops-13.xades.com.> (sfid-20090726_175040_801519_DD87309E) <17294.1248803737@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <670B2955-DE29-49C4-808E-D0242B504F55@garycmartin.com> Message-ID: On 29 Jul 2009, at 03:28, Gary C Martin wrote: > Incase it rings any bells, thought I'd just mention that screen > dimming has now stopped altogether for me. I've reset powerd pref > changes back to the default but no luck. It still powers off the > screen, but no back-light auto-dimming. The closest I have to narrow > things is that I noticed the dimming seemed to stop after I manually > adjusted the screen brightness with the keyboard (maybe I tried to > adjust it when it was already auto-dimmed, or some such permutation). Many apologies for this, on further poking it turned out to be a "problem between desk and chair" (user error). I misread the /etc/ powerd/powerd.conf comments and thought config_IDLE_DIM_LEVEL was represented as a percentage brightness (0-100), but it is actually based on the 0-15 hardware levels available. It was originally set at 5, and in an attempt to reduce the dimming up/down behaviour, I'd set it to 50 (15 or above is no dimming), and then later assumed it was a percentage. Regarding dimming: I think it's less that the current dimming settings that distracts me, but the apparent random wake-ups ? I'm assume it is network, or intermittent background activity that wakes things up. I'll try reducing the config_CPU_IDLE_LIMIT and see if that helps prevent seemingly random wake-ups. Apologies, --Gary From pgf at laptop.org Thu Jul 30 00:36:31 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:36:31 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <20090729225344.GI9673@us.netrek.org> (sfid-20090729_185404_024491_FBA13CA8) References: <818423da0907232205p14cb116bj5b777e12e1b1545b@mail.gmail.com> <12956.1248874500@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <20090729225344.GI9673@us.netrek.org> (sfid-20090729_185404_024491_FBA13CA8) Message-ID: <757.1248914191@foxharp.boston.ma.us> james wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:35:00AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote: > > specifically, try: > > time rtcwake -m mem -a -s 10 > > > > does the system wake up reliably? > > No. It does wake on other activity once put into this sleep. thanks. > > /sys/power/wakeup_events/* are all 1, and none of them are rtc. like the lid, the rtc isn't a member of that club. > > /sys/devices/platform/rtc_cmos/power/wakeup is "enabled" > okay. i suspect a kernel config error of some sort, because this works in the SoaS-on-XO images. paul > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From mikus at bga.com Thu Jul 30 00:25:25 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:25:25 -0400 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown Message-ID: <4A70E875.5010602@bga.com> > Yet another log of random shutdown. I noticed from the /var/log/messages content enclosed in your recent post that your processor is running at 497.488 MHz. My XO-1s are running at around 430.911 MHz. Are you overclocking your XO-1 ? mikus From quozl at laptop.org Thu Jul 30 01:34:28 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:34:28 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <4A70E875.5010602@bga.com> References: <4A70E875.5010602@bga.com> Message-ID: <20090730013428.GA23246@us.netrek.org> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:25:25PM -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > I noticed from the /var/log/messages content enclosed in your recent > post that your processor is running at 497.488 MHz. My XO-1s are > running at around 430.911 MHz. Are you overclocking your XO-1 ? I've just checked, /proc/cpuinfo is showing 430MHz on both XO-1 units I have that are running this build and experiencing the random uncommanded shutdown. /var/log/messages also matches. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From quozl at laptop.org Thu Jul 30 01:43:59 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:43:59 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <306304.83153.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <306304.83153.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090730014359.GB23246@us.netrek.org> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:10:48AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Given that in my hands the shutdowns are happening usually very soon > after boot, eg as soon as/while the xo is connecting to the wifi, I > would guess that the problem stems from there. I agree, that matches my shutdowns as well ... usually very soon after boot, within a minute of associating with an access point. I've got /var/log/messages being saved in /home/olpc/log/messages, and here is the time sequence of messages when these uncommanded shutdowns occur: Jul 30 01:29:29 localhost NetworkManager: (eth0): device state change: 7 -> 8 (reason 0) Jul 30 01:29:30 localhost NetworkManager: Policy set 'Auto quozl.linux.org.au' (eth0) as default for routing and DNS. Jul 30 01:29:30 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) successful, device activated. Jul 30 01:29:30 localhost NetworkManager: Activation (eth0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) complete. Jul 30 01:30:23 localhost init: tty4 main process (1755) killed by TERM signal Jul 30 01:30:23 localhost init: tty5 main process (1756) killed by TERM signal Jul 30 01:30:23 localhost init: tty2 main process (1757) killed by TERM signal As you can see, roughly 50 seconds elapsed from when the access point association completed and init decided to kill all the tty processes. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From mavrothal at yahoo.com Thu Jul 30 04:49:46 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown Message-ID: <577439.14690.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Wed, 7/29/09, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > From: Mikus Grinbergs > Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown > To: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Cc: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 8:25 PM > > Yet another log of random > shutdown. > > I noticed from the /var/log/messages content enclosed in > your recent post that your processor is running at 497.488 > MHz.? My XO-1s are running at around 430.911 MHz.? > Are you overclocking your XO-1 ? Fro the last 1 year+ :) The olpc.fth is in my Ubuntu/swap containing SDcard (follows) _However_ both random shutdown and X problems are happening also without the SDcard when the XO is using the original f110XO1/os2 olpc.fth -------------------------------------------------- SDcard olpc.fth: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: olpc.fth Type: application/octet-stream Size: 575 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mavrothal at yahoo.com Thu Jul 30 05:03:01 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing In-Reply-To: <20090729224629.GH9673@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <120884.37040.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> The only thing I can think of that might have generated file corruption(?) and the consecutive X problem is that I did mount (and unmount) the NAND while booted in Ubuntu from the SDcard. Has anyone used the XO booting from the SD card with os2 containing NAND mounted? With os767/802 the file system was not really accessible when booting from the card (only the home directory) but with os2 everything is accessible. Given that you mount it as sudo all kind of things can happen... --- On Wed, 7/29/09, James Cameron wrote: > From: James Cameron > Subject: Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: "fedora-olpc-list" > Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 6:46 PM > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:06:14PM > -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > The latest incidence with F11-XO1/os2 is that will not > get to the Home > > screen but instead will stay in a white and then black > screen. I can > > get a console and everything seems to work but startx > tells me that X > > is running in another terminal. Through repetitive > reboots stays the > > same. > > Probably the X client programs not starting.? Is there > an X running in > another terminal?? Check the process list.? Check > for children processes > of X. > > > It's probably some file corruption and I'll reinstall, > but just in > > case is something systemic I got var/log/messages and > x.org.log > > attached. > > Reviewed, nothing unusual in them given the symptom. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > From mikus at bga.com Thu Jul 30 04:11:14 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:11:14 -0400 Subject: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing Message-ID: <4A711D62.80605@bga.com> Paul wrote > i suspect a kernel config error of some sort, because this > works in the SoaS-on-XO images. What I'm seeing from 'time rtcwake -m mem -a -s 10' is different: On f11-xo1/os2 (and on devxo-1, which came from the Soas folks) the above command puts the XO-1 into "suspend" -- and it stays there. I have to press the 'power' button to get the XO to "resume". On SoaS3 and Strawberry (both of which came from the SoaS folks), the 'rtcwake' command *never* causes "suspend" -- the above command completes immediately (total elapsed is less than 0.1 seconds). mikus From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 01:18:47 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:18:47 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <577439.14690.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <577439.14690.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090731011847.GB23685@us.netrek.org> Yioryos, it seems you and I are the only ones to see this problem, and there are others who are not seeing it. I wonder if it is environmental ... that is it is triggered also by something else in the environment. Do you have the units associated with an access point? What is the manufacturer and model of the access point, and what software is it running? Are there any other laptops nearby that are running older versions of the wireless firmware? For instance I've a B2 on camera sentry duty in another room running build 406. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 04:49:27 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <20090731011847.GB23685@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <357739.11229.qm@web65516.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Thu, 7/30/09, James Cameron wrote: > From: James Cameron > Yioryos, it seems you and I are the > only ones to see this problem, and > there are others who are not seeing it. This is good :) > > I wonder if it is environmental ... that is it is triggered > also by > something else in the environment. > > Do you have the units associated with an access point? > > What is the manufacturer and model of the access point, and > what > software is it running? So far a PHILIPS CGA5722N/TE with WEP security (the software version info will take some time) and a public point (SpeedTouch-no other info available.Sorry) > > Are there any other laptops nearby that are running older > versions of > the wireless firmware?? For instance I've a B2 on > camera sentry duty in > another room running build 406. There area other machines connected but no other XOs as far as I can tell. Do you also get "eth0 no private ioctls" during boot? I do not remember that with 767/802 From pgf at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 05:15:30 2009 From: pgf at laptop.org (Paul Fox) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:15:30 -0400 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <20090731011847.GB23685@us.netrek.org> (sfid-20090730_212546_699584_C74B87C0) References: <577439.14690.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <20090731011847.GB23685@us.netrek.org> (sfid-20090730_212546_699584_C74B87C0) Message-ID: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> james wrote: > Yioryos, it seems you and I are the only ones to see this problem, and > there are others who are not seeing it. reuben caron (at 1cc) mentioned that he'd seen the shutdown thing too. (i believe he's set up logging in case it happens again.) > > I wonder if it is environmental ... that is it is triggered also by > something else in the environment. i think you said you'd strace'd init, and had seen the shutdown signal, correct? i wonder if it would be worth stracing the most likely (e.g., under heavy development) candidates: network manager, X11, others? the goal, of course, being to find out who sent the signal to init. (while i'm clearly relieved that powerd is definitely not involved in some of these shutdowns, it would have narrowed the search a lot if it _was_ the likely culprit. :-) paul =--------------------- paul fox, pgf at laptop.org From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 06:30:12 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: f11-XO1/os2-Sugar problems Message-ID: <232296.23988.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> I'm not sure if it is th specific build or the applications involved but I'll go with the first since the applications work on other builds. Pippy 34 will run but all the example programs will fail because they do not find the modules to import (path issue?) Turtle Art 60 will not install after download even if you click on the downloaded file in the journal. I can install new applications but this is the first one I tried to _update_. From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 07:24:47 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> Message-ID: <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> I had another one in the middle of the session as soon as I connected to the WiFi and tried to load a page. So far in 6 incidences it never happened in GNOME (statistically it should have if it was a Fedora issue) never without wifi and never with long established (>3min) wifi. The frequency is about 1 out of 10 attempts to launch an activity (presence/collaboration?) or load a web page in Browse (I also use Firefox,Midori under Sugar-though the frequency might not warrant an event) within 1min after establishing a network connection. So although NM is involved I do not think is responsible (see GNOME). Just my 2 cents. --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Paul Fox wrote: > From: Paul Fox > Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown > To: fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 1:15 AM > james wrote: > > Yioryos, it seems you and I are the only ones to see > this problem, and > > there are others who are not seeing it. > > reuben caron (at 1cc) mentioned that he'd seen the shutdown > thing > too.? (i believe he's set up logging in case it > happens again.) > > > > > I wonder if it is environmental ... that is it is > triggered also by > > something else in the environment. > > i think you said you'd strace'd init, and had seen the > shutdown > signal, correct?? i wonder if it would be worth > stracing the most > likely (e.g., under heavy development) candidates:? > network > manager, X11, others?? the goal, of course, being to > find out who > sent the signal to init. > > (while i'm clearly relieved that powerd is definitely not > involved in some of these shutdowns, it would have narrowed > the > search a lot if it _was_ the likely culprit.? :-) > > paul > =--------------------- > paul fox, pgf at laptop.org > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list > From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 08:41:13 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:26:13 +0545 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/31 Yioryos Asprobounitis : > > I had another one in the middle of the session as soon as I connected to the WiFi and tried to load a page. > So far in 6 incidences it never happened in GNOME (statistically it should have if it was a Fedora issue) never without wifi and never with long established (>3min) wifi. The frequency is about 1 out of 10 attempts to launch an activity (presence/collaboration?) or load a web page in Browse (I also use Firefox,Midori under Sugar-though the frequency might not warrant an event) within 1min after establishing a network connection. > So although NM is involved I do not think is responsible (see GNOME). > Just my 2 cents. I have a theory on this bug which I am pretty confident about: olpc-update recently grew code to detect when a laptop is stolen. When the laptop is stolen, it will delete the lease and power off. See /usr/bin/olpc-update-query, the code near: # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of # any leases and poweroff I suggest removing the call to halt and adding some logging instead, to confirm this theory. If you could also log the value of str(resp_map) and show us this then it will help us diagnose the issue. Either activation.laptop.org is saying that your laptop is stolen, or there is some bug on the client side where it is misinterpreting the response and thinking that it has been stolen. Thanks, Daniel From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 10:31:32 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:31:32 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:26:13PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: > See /usr/bin/olpc-update-query, the code near: > # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of > # any leases and poweroff I think you're right. Here's why: [root at localhost ~]# ls -l /security/ total 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 31 06:02 update-attempt [root at localhost ~]# /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query Error setting OHM inhibit: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedesktop.ohm was not provided by any .service files Broadcast message from root at localhost.localdomain (/dev/pts/0) at 6:23 ... The system is going down for halt NOW! [root at localhost ~]# > I suggest removing the call to halt and adding some logging instead, > to confirm this theory. If you could also log the value of > str(resp_map) and show us this then it will help us diagnose the > issue. {'nonce': '6cb0c08d464152816a040ad071d4f46e', 'stolen': '7df745eed2112c9fd3c356c35dda7cbdffa3c496d08e58641550fc0f651a12f4', 'time': '20090731T102917Z'} {'nonce': '58aaf6558ab743a335bf5d5859a64a69', 'stolen': '8038107e352154e6a0b3319cca4a20d884b095ce85268b9fc0e54eacde487cca', 'time': '20090731T103027Z'} > Either activation.laptop.org is saying that your laptop is > stolen, or there is some bug on the client side where it is > misinterpreting the response and thinking that it has been stolen. Both units don't do this with build 802. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 11:29:07 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:14:07 +0545 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/31 James Cameron : > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:26:13PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> See /usr/bin/olpc-update-query, the code near: >> ? ? ? ? # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of >> ? ? ? ? # any leases and poweroff > > I think you're right. ?Here's why: > > [root at localhost ~]# ls -l /security/ > total 0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 31 06:02 update-attempt > [root at localhost ~]# /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query > Error setting OHM inhibit: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: > The name org.freedesktop.ohm was not provided by any .service files > > Broadcast message from root at localhost.localdomain > ? ? ? ?(/dev/pts/0) at 6:23 ... > > The system is going down for halt NOW! > [root at localhost ~]# > >> I suggest removing the call to halt and adding some logging instead, >> to confirm this theory. If you could also log the value of >> str(resp_map) and show us this then it will help us diagnose the >> issue. > > {'nonce': '6cb0c08d464152816a040ad071d4f46e', 'stolen': > '7df745eed2112c9fd3c356c35dda7cbdffa3c496d08e58641550fc0f651a12f4', > 'time': '20090731T102917Z'} > > {'nonce': '58aaf6558ab743a335bf5d5859a64a69', 'stolen': > '8038107e352154e6a0b3319cca4a20d884b095ce85268b9fc0e54eacde487cca', > 'time': '20090731T103027Z'} I think I see the problem. I think martin has misinterpreted the theft deterrence protocol. In check_stolen_hash(), please modify strings to be: strings = ( uuid + ':' + nonce + ':STOLEN' ) i.e. remove the first entry, which actually indicates non-stolen. Does that help? Thanks, Daniel From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 11:56:33 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:56:33 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:14:07PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: > I think I see the problem. I think martin has misinterpreted the theft > deterrence protocol. Per "rpm -qf /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query" one can see that it is from package olpc-update-2.19-1.fc11.noarch Is there an earlier version? Where can I find the src.rpm and the upstream source? > In check_stolen_hash(), please modify strings to be: > strings = ( uuid + ':' + nonce + ':STOLEN' ) > i.e. remove the first entry, which actually indicates non-stolen. > > Does that help? No. Just to confirm the change you requested, here's the diff ... # diff -u /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query.orig /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query --- /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query.orig 2009-07-31 07:51:27.000000000 -0400 +++ /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query 2009-07-31 07:51:51.000000000 -0400 @@ -125,8 +125,7 @@ def check_stolen_hash(hash, nonce, uuid): - strings = ( uuid + ':' + nonce, - uuid + ':' + nonce + ':STOLEN' ) + strings = ( uuid + ':' + nonce + ':STOLEN' ) for msg in strings: if hash == hashlib.sha256(msg).hexdigest(): return True # And the output still shows it would have halted and str(resp_map) shows {'nonce': '55462871e50934b75f96ff311776adc5', 'stolen': '19e8b87862c9d321f5aeec5de8d405b40de4b0a7f06c2dd6ab4a170aba85716e', 'time': '20090731T115207Z'} -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Fri Jul 31 12:54:30 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:54:30 -0600 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <46a038f90907310554pe856875wec1c55dbb857381f@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:56 AM, James Cameron wrote: > And the output still shows it would have halted and str(resp_map) shows > > {'nonce': '55462871e50934b75f96ff311776adc5', 'stolen': > '19e8b87862c9d321f5aeec5de8d405b40de4b0a7f06c2dd6ab4a170aba85716e', > 'time': '20090731T115207Z'} It does sound like the server response says stolen. What does the 'data' variable -- which will hold the raw server response -- contain? Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, then olpc-update-query shouldn't care. Clearly your machines are devkey'd. m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 15:39:30 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <46a038f90907310554pe856875wec1c55dbb857381f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <143772.62360.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff wrote:> > It does sound like the server response says stolen. What > does the > 'data' variable -- which will hold the raw server response > -- contain? > > Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, then > olpc-update-query > shouldn't care. Clearly your machines are devkey'd. > Well,... I _believe_ I had security disabled in OFW long time ago but I did not have a secyrity key installed in this build (I do now :) We'll see how it goes. However if this is the problem why is not doing it all the time? Is it checking only once per day? Come to think of it I _think_ I had one sudden shutdown per day. We'll see... BTW, wget is missing from the build Also getting the key from laptop.org I get the response Resolving activation.laptop.org... 18.85.46.43 Connecting to activation.laptop.org|18.85.46.43|:443... connected. ERROR: cannot verify activation.laptop.org's certificate, issued by `/CN=One Laptop Per Child Root Certification Authority/C=US/O=One Laptop Per Child Association, Inc./ST=Massachusetts/L=Cambridge/emailAddress=ca at laptop.org': Unable to locally verify the issuer's authority. To connect to activation.laptop.org insecurely, use `--no-check-certificate'. Unable to establish SSL connection. > > > m > -- > martin.langhoff at gmail.com > martin at laptop.org > -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - working > code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > From ed at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 15:43:06 2009 From: ed at laptop.org (Ed McNierney) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:43:06 -0400 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <143772.62360.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <143772.62360.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <25BCBF76-020C-43F1-9F79-D6D5AF6339E0@laptop.org> Yioryos - activation.laptop.org does indeed have an expired security certificate. We're working on fixing that, but it is a surprisingly non-trivial task. In the meantime, follow the instructions and use the --no-check-certificate option. - Ed On Jul 31, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff > wrote:> >> It does sound like the server response says stolen. What >> does the >> 'data' variable -- which will hold the raw server response >> -- contain? >> >> Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, then >> olpc-update-query >> shouldn't care. Clearly your machines are devkey'd. >> > > Well,... I _believe_ I had security disabled in OFW long time ago > but I did not have a secyrity key installed in this build (I do > now :) We'll see how it goes. > However if this is the problem why is not doing it all the time? Is > it checking only once per day? Come to think of it I _think_ I had > one sudden shutdown per day. We'll see... > > BTW, wget is missing from the build > Also getting the key from laptop.org I get the response > Resolving activation.laptop.org... 18.85.46.43 > Connecting to activation.laptop.org|18.85.46.43|:443... connected. > ERROR: cannot verify activation.laptop.org's certificate, issued by > `/CN=One Laptop Per Child Root Certification Authority/C=US/O=One > Laptop Per Child Association, Inc./ST=Massachusetts/L=Cambridge/emailAddress=ca at laptop.org > ': > Unable to locally verify the issuer's authority. > To connect to activation.laptop.org insecurely, use `--no-check- > certificate'. > Unable to establish SSL connection. > > >> >> >> m >> -- >> martin.langhoff at gmail.com >> martin at laptop.org >> -- School Server Architect >> - ask interesting questions >> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working >> code first >> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-olpc-list mailing list > Fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Fri Jul 31 15:49:37 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:49:37 -0600 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <143772.62360.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <46a038f90907310554pe856875wec1c55dbb857381f@mail.gmail.com> <143772.62360.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <46a038f90907310849v1e13cc69nc693b0418ec30d5b@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff wrote:> >> It does sound like the server response says stolen. What >> does the >> 'data' variable -- which will hold the raw server response >> -- contain? >> >> Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, then >> olpc-update-query >> shouldn't care. Clearly your machines are devkey'd. >> > > Well,... I _believe_ I had security disabled in OFW long time Can you dump the contents of 'data' for us? If the server seems to claim your XO is stolen, part of the question is why? cheers, m -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 16:08:02 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <46a038f90907310849v1e13cc69nc693b0418ec30d5b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <396066.83548.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff wrote: > From: Martin Langhoff > Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: "James Cameron" , "Daniel Drake" , fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:49 AM > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:39 AM, > Yioryos > Asprobounitis > wrote: > > > > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff > wrote:> > >> It does sound like the server response says > stolen. What > >> does the > >> 'data' variable -- which will hold the raw server > response > >> -- contain? > >> > >> Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, then > >> olpc-update-query > >> shouldn't care. Clearly your machines are > devkey'd. > >> > > > > Well,... I _believe_ I had security disabled in OFW > long time > > Can you dump the contents of 'data' for us? If the server > seems to > claim your XO is stolen, part of the question is why? > If you tell me what exactly you want and how I get it, with pleasure. (I know is a dev thread but I'm far from one :) Also, by now I do have the devkey installed > cheers, > > > m > -- > martin.langhoff at gmail.com > martin at laptop.org > -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - working > code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 16:24:36 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <46a038f90907310849v1e13cc69nc693b0418ec30d5b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <507761.34359.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Actually issuing [root at localhost activity]# /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query consistently shuts down my XO! And I do have the devkey installed --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff wrote: > From: Martin Langhoff > Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: "James Cameron" , "Daniel Drake" , fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:49 AM > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:39 AM, > Yioryos > Asprobounitis > wrote: > > > > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff > wrote:> > >> It does sound like the server response says > stolen. What > >> does the > >> 'data' variable -- which will hold the raw server > response > >> -- contain? > >> > >> Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, then > >> olpc-update-query > >> shouldn't care. Clearly your machines are > devkey'd. > >> > > > > Well,... I _believe_ I had security disabled in OFW > long time > > Can you dump the contents of 'data' for us? If the server > seems to > claim your XO is stolen, part of the question is why? > > cheers, > > > m > -- > martin.langhoff at gmail.com > martin at laptop.org > -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - working > code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > From dsd at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 18:15:19 2009 From: dsd at laptop.org (Daniel Drake) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 00:00:19 +0545 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <818423da0907311115g38a60ffcw508028cc541da75d@mail.gmail.com> 2009/7/31 James Cameron : > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:14:07PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> I think I see the problem. I think martin has misinterpreted the theft >> deterrence protocol. > > Per "rpm -qf /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query" one can see that it is from > package olpc-update-2.19-1.fc11.noarch > > Is there an earlier version? > > Where can I find the src.rpm and the upstream source? It's a standard Fedora package. >> In check_stolen_hash(), please modify strings to be: >> ? ? strings = ( uuid + ':' + nonce + ':STOLEN' ) >> i.e. remove the first entry, which actually indicates non-stolen. >> >> Does that help? > > No. Your diff is correct but I see a 2nd bug too: the return value of check_stolen_hash is never checked. handmade diff for you to test: - if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map: - check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce) + if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map and check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce): # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of let me know if you need more details... From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 18:54:58 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <818423da0907311115g38a60ffcw508028cc541da75d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <820579.46380.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Daniel Drake wrote: > From: Daniel Drake > Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown > To: "James Cameron" > Cc: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" , fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com, "Martin Langhoff" > Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 2:15 PM > 2009/7/31 James Cameron : > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:14:07PM +0545, Daniel Drake > wrote: > >> I think I see the problem. I think martin has > misinterpreted the theft > >> deterrence protocol. > > > > Per "rpm -qf /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query" one can see > that it is from > > package olpc-update-2.19-1.fc11.noarch > > > > Is there an earlier version? > > > > Where can I find the src.rpm and the upstream source? > > It's a standard Fedora package. > > >> In check_stolen_hash(), please modify strings to > be: > >> ? ? strings = ( uuid + ':' + nonce + ':STOLEN' > ) > >> i.e. remove the first entry, which actually > indicates non-stolen. > >> > >> Does that help? > > > > No. > > Your diff is correct but I see a 2nd bug too: the return > value of > check_stolen_hash is never checked. > > handmade diff for you to test: > > -? ? if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map: > -? ? > ???check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], > uuid, nonce) > +? ? if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map and > check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce): > # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of > > let me know if you need more details... > I do not know if with this patch the XO is still protected but certainly /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query in NOT crashing my XO anymore From martin.langhoff at gmail.com Fri Jul 31 18:57:02 2009 From: martin.langhoff at gmail.com (Martin Langhoff) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:57:02 -0600 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <507761.34359.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <46a038f90907310849v1e13cc69nc693b0418ec30d5b@mail.gmail.com> <507761.34359.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <46a038f90907311157r356b25fr2c642d615a43f781@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > Actually issuing > [root at localhost activity]# /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query > consistently shuts down my XO! > And I do have the devkey installed Yes, that's consistent with the diagnosis we've been making. If you can edit your olpc-update-query script (make a backup!) find the line that calls 'halt', comment it out (prefixing it with a #) and add right under it, with the same indentation: report(0, 'Server said stolen: %s' % data) the whole block of code will look like if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map: check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce) # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of # any leases and poweroff if os.path.exists(LEASE_FILE): os.unlink(LEASE_FILE) #call(['/usr/bin/halt']) report(0, 'Server said stolen: %s' % data) exit() cheers, m > > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff wrote: > >> From: Martin Langhoff >> Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown >> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" >> Cc: "James Cameron" , "Daniel Drake" , fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com >> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:49 AM >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:39 AM, >> Yioryos >> Asprobounitis >> wrote: >> > >> > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff >> wrote:> >> >> It does sound like the server response says >> stolen. What >> >> does the >> >> 'data' variable -- which will hold the raw server >> response >> >> -- contain? >> >> >> >> Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, then >> >> olpc-update-query >> >> shouldn't care. Clearly your machines are >> devkey'd. >> >> >> > >> > Well,... I _believe_ I had security disabled in OFW >> long time >> >> Can you dump the contents of 'data' for us? If the server >> seems to >> claim your XO is stolen, part of the question is why? >> >> cheers, >> >> >> m >> -- >> ?martin.langhoff at gmail.com >> ?martin at laptop.org >> -- School Server Architect >> ?- ask interesting questions >> ?- don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - working >> code first >> ?- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff >> > > > > -- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff From juliano at lec.ufrgs.br Fri Jul 31 18:57:35 2009 From: juliano at lec.ufrgs.br (Juliano Bittencourt) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:57:35 +0200 Subject: Image created with XO-1 scripts doesn't boot Message-ID: Hello all, Since I'm currently living in Rwanda (with an overpriced slow connection), I though it would save me some time if I built my F11 images locally. I copied the scripts of the xo-1 branch at git and ran them to generate and os.img file. Everything went fine and after 3 days (downloading rpms) I got the image. I copied it to my XO-1, but it didn't booted. The machines freezes after ofw loads the ramdisk. No Linux kernel message at all. Some idea of what could be happening? Thanks, Juliano Juliano Bittencourt Laborat?rio de Estudos Cognitivos - LEC Address: Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2600 - Bairro Santa Cec?lia - Porto Alegre - RS - Brasil Phone: +55 51 3308 5250 and +55 51 3308 5690 From mavrothal at yahoo.com Fri Jul 31 19:29:48 2009 From: mavrothal at yahoo.com (Yioryos Asprobounitis) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <46a038f90907311157r356b25fr2c642d615a43f781@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <985429.50613.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff wrote: > From: Martin Langhoff > Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: "James Cameron" , "Daniel Drake" , fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 2:57 PM > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:24 AM, > Yioryos > Asprobounitis > wrote: > > > > Actually issuing > > [root at localhost activity]# > /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query > > consistently shuts down my XO! > > And I do have the devkey installed > > Yes, that's consistent with the diagnosis we've been > making. > > If you can edit your olpc-update-query script (make a > backup!) find > the line that calls 'halt', comment it out (prefixing it > with a #) and > add right under it, with the same indentation: > > ? ???report(0, 'Server said stolen: %s' > % data) > > the whole block of code will look like > > ? ? if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map: > ? ? ? ? > check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce) > ? ? ? ? # this machine has been > reported stolen - get rid of > ? ? ? ? # any leases and poweroff > ? ? ? ? if os.path.exists(LEASE_FILE): > ? ? ? ? ? ? > os.unlink(LEASE_FILE) > ? ? ? ? #call(['/usr/bin/halt']) > ? ? ? ? report(0, 'Server said stolen: > %s' % data) > ? ? ? ? exit() > > This works too in NOT crashing my XO upon /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query. Which one is the best theft deterrent is up to you guys. > cheers, > > > > > m > > > > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff > wrote: > > > >> From: Martin Langhoff > >> Subject: Re: F11 for the X01- shutdown > >> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > >> Cc: "James Cameron" , > "Daniel Drake" , > fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com > >> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:49 AM > >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:39 AM, > >> Yioryos > >> Asprobounitis > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Martin Langhoff > >> wrote:> > >> >> It does sound like the server response > says > >> stolen. What > >> >> does the > >> >> 'data' variable -- which will hold the > raw server > >> response > >> >> -- contain? > >> >> > >> >> Arguably, if the machines are jailbroken, > then > >> >> olpc-update-query > >> >> shouldn't care. Clearly your machines > are > >> devkey'd. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Well,... I _believe_ I had security disabled > in OFW > >> long time > >> > >> Can you dump the contents of 'data' for us? If the > server > >> seems to > >> claim your XO is stolen, part of the question is > why? > >> > >> cheers, > >> > >> > >> m > >> -- > >> ?martin.langhoff at gmail.com > >> ?martin at laptop.org > >> -- School Server Architect > >> ?- ask interesting questions > >> ?- don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - > working > >> code first > >> ?- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > martin.langhoff at gmail.com > martin at laptop.org > -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff? - working > code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > From mikus at bga.com Fri Jul 31 18:41:45 2009 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:41:45 -0400 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown Message-ID: <4A733AE9.806@bga.com> Yioryos wrote: > Actually issuing > [root at localhost activity]# /usr/sbin/olpc-update-query > consistently shuts down my XO! > And I do have the devkey installed Interesting. The *only* F11-based build I use which comes with the 'olpc-update' package installed is f11-xo1/os2. And when I issue the 'olpc-update-query' command there, what I get is : | 0 [olpc]# olpc-update-query | Traceback (most recent call last): | File "/usr/sbin/olpc-update-query", line 13, in | from bitfrost.update import perform_update, inhibit_suspend, check_signature | File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bitfrost/update/__init__.py", line 5, in | from setup import perform_update, inhibit_suspend, check_signature | File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bitfrost/update/setup.py", line 11, in | from bitfrost.leases.keys import OS_KEYS, DEVELOPER_KEYS | File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bitfrost/leases/keys.py", line 52, in | raise Exception("OFW is not mounted, cannot read deployment keys") | Exception: OFW is not mounted, cannot read deployment keys | 0 [olpc]# mikus From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 23:06:44 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:06:44 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <818423da0907311115g38a60ffcw508028cc541da75d@mail.gmail.com> References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907311115g38a60ffcw508028cc541da75d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090731230644.GA7851@us.netrek.org> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 12:00:19AM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/7/31 James Cameron : > > Where can I find the src.rpm and the upstream source? > > It's a standard Fedora package. Bugger. I always get that answer, and it never satisfies. I'm stalled, unable to find the src.rpm and the upstream source, I ask, and someone says "it's a Fedora package", as if to say "you ought to know and I'm not going to tell you what you need to know to proceed." ;-) > Your diff is correct but I see a 2nd bug too: the return value of > check_stolen_hash is never checked. > > handmade diff for you to test: > > - if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map: > - check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce) > + if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map and > check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce): > # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of > > let me know if you need more details... That fixed it. Running olpc-update-query manually no longer reports the machine as stolen. The change was: --- olpc-update-query.orig 2009-07-31 23:02:51.000000000 -0400 +++ olpc-update-query 2009-07-31 23:02:31.000000000 -0400 @@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ if 'nonce' not in resp_map or nonce != resp_map['nonce']: raise RuntimeError('bad nonce in reply') - if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map: - check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce) + if isxo and 'stolen' in resp_map and \ + check_stolen_hash(resp_map['stolen'], uuid, nonce): # this machine has been reported stolen - get rid of # any leases and poweroff if os.path.exists(LEASE_FILE): -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 23:11:02 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:11:02 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <46a038f90907311157r356b25fr2c642d615a43f781@mail.gmail.com> References: <46a038f90907310849v1e13cc69nc693b0418ec30d5b@mail.gmail.com> <507761.34359.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <46a038f90907311157r356b25fr2c642d615a43f781@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090731231102.GB7851@us.netrek.org> Martin wrote: > Can you dump the contents of 'data' for us? If the server seems to > claim your XO is stolen, part of the question is why? It seems the other poster didn't answer this, so here's what I get. Server said stolen: ['oatc-resp', 1, {'nonce': 'e2e89084ce657bb521f671ef9772670b', 'stolen': 'dbd1f60dfa73f5ca775c9a2dd0f11a63db76d0aa499a52bf5188257552305473', 'time': '20090731T230912Z'}] -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From cjb at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 23:13:46 2009 From: cjb at laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:13:46 -0400 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <20090731230644.GA7851@us.netrek.org> (James Cameron's message of "Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:06:44 +1000") References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907311115g38a60ffcw508028cc541da75d@mail.gmail.com> <20090731230644.GA7851@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: Hi, > Bugger. I always get that answer, and it never satisfies. I'm > stalled, unable to find the src.rpm and the upstream source, I > ask, and someone says "it's a Fedora package", as if to say "you > ought to know and I'm not going to tell you what you need to know > to proceed." ;-) Well, hey, this is fedora-olpc-list. Expecting that people will know how to find source for a Fedora package or be willing to perform a web search to find out can't be *that* unreasonable. :) Here's the answer: Go to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/, type "olpc-update" into the top-right search field, hit search, click on the build you want, and you can download the source and binary RPMs. If you're running a Fedora machine, or have access to one (such as an XO), it's easier: pullcord:cjb~ % yumdownloader --source olpc-utils olpc-utils-1.0.3-2.fc12.src.rpm | 55 kB 00:00 pullcord:cjb~ % - Chris. -- Chris Ball From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 23:14:03 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:14:03 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: <4A733AE9.806@bga.com> References: <4A733AE9.806@bga.com> Message-ID: <20090731231403.GC7851@us.netrek.org> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:41:45PM -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > Interesting. The *only* F11-based build I use which comes with the > 'olpc-update' package installed is f11-xo1/os2. And when I issue > the 'olpc-update-query' command there, what I get is : > > | Exception: OFW is not mounted, cannot read deployment keys That's odd. Why isn't /ofw mounted? # mount ... none on /ofw type promfs (rw) # grep ofw /etc/fstab none /ofw promfs defaults 0 0 What version of XO firmware is installed? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From quozl at laptop.org Fri Jul 31 23:22:22 2009 From: quozl at laptop.org (James Cameron) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:22:22 +1000 Subject: F11 for the X01- shutdown In-Reply-To: References: <9497.1249017330@foxharp.boston.ma.us> <271706.66003.qm@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <818423da0907310141s2f76f325v17c390c1349f542c@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103132.GD4700@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907310429k5ec431acmb6cc245ec590cfeb@mail.gmail.com> <20090731115633.GB15083@us.netrek.org> <818423da0907311115g38a60ffcw508028cc541da75d@mail.gmail.com> <20090731230644.GA7851@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <20090731232222.GE7851@us.netrek.org> Fantastic, thanks! -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/