30-keymap-olpc.fdi move from hal-info considered harmful?
Paul Fox
pgf at laptop.org
Mon Sep 14 04:24:18 UTC 2009
martin wrote:
> Sayamindu, rwh, and Team OLPC,
>
> Please reconsider the resolution of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514081 . Currently the
> resolution of this bug -- moving the file from the hal-info rpm to the
> olpc-utils rpm -- means olpc-utils must be installed for the
> 30-keymap-olpc.fdi file mapping the XO-1{,.5} keys to be installed.
to be clear, the resolution wasn't to move the file -- there were
two copies, one incorrect, and we requested that the out-of-date
one be dropped.
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9421
but perhaps this was the wrong thing to do, for the reasons you've
given below.
paul
>
> The problem with this is that olpc-utils brings in a raft of changes
> that are inappropriate for non-OLPC installs of Fedora. For example,
> the "olpc" user is assumed to exist, its homedir is written to, and
> olpc-dm is installed as the default display manager with the user
> "olpc" as the auto-login user. This breaks X startup unless the olpc
> user exists.
>
> Is there a better resolution that allows XO-1 keys to be recognised
> on a F12 timeframe without olpc-utils's other changes?
>
> Perhaps just putting the latest 30-keymap-olpc.fdi from
> http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-utils/plain/etc/hal/fdi/information/30-keymap-olpc.fdi
> back into the hal-info package?
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Fedora-olpc-list
mailing list