From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188757] New: Review Request: ANOTHER TEST Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188757 Summary: Review Request: ANOTHER TEST Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188757] Review Request: ANOTHER TEST In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604122043.k3CKhlWQ014819@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ANOTHER TEST https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188757 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:47:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188757] Review Request: ANOTHER TEST In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604122047.k3CKl8Sc016458@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ANOTHER TEST https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188757 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:50:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 154392] HelixPlayer should be removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604122050.k3CKoCIX019663@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HelixPlayer should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154392 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-04-12 16:49 EST ------- Unsure if this is a proper use of the review process, but I happen to want this to be removed too. Let's see if it is possible now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:50:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604122050.k3CKo6BI019615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:50:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604122050.k3CKoX8T019807@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:50:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604122050.k3CKoeIm019845@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 12 20:50:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604122050.k3CKowpl019905@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gnome-utils |Review Request: gnome-utils CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 00:40:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604130040.k3D0edcu029934@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 11:55:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131155.k3DBtHRp020024@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 11:56:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131156.k3DBubYD020305@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 15:46:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131546.k3DFk1ew006876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 16:22:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131622.k3DGMi4j014074@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 12:22 EST ------- Requires may automatically get picked up from %post, but not sure, will test later. .desktop file is included, but not installed. Please use desktop-file-install within %install. Will try building package next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 16:59:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131659.k3DGxS8w021076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 12:59 EST ------- Also, before anybody else notices, the spec file linked is not the same one in the srpm, the linked one is newer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 18:46:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131846.k3DIkHcM015249@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 14:45 EST ------- During the build of i386, there are lots of errors about not being able to install schema files. Are these expected? WARNING: failed to install schema `/schemas/apps/gcalctool/accuracy' locale `C': Unable to store a value at key '/schemas/apps/gcalctool/accuracy', as the configuration server has no writable databases. There are some common causes of this problem: 1) your configuration path file /etc/gconf/2/path doesn't contain any databases or wasn't found 2) somehow we mistakenly created two gconfd processes 3) your operating system is misconfigured so NFS file locking doesn't work in your home directory or 4) your NFS client machine crashed and didn't properly notify the server on reboot that file locks should be dropped. If you have two gconfd processes (or had two at the time the second was launched), logging out, killing all copies of gconfd, and logging back in may help. If you have stale locks, remove ~/.gconf*/*lock. Perhaps the problem is that you attempted to use GConf from two machines at once, and ORBit still has its default configuration that prevents remote CORBA connections - put "ORBIIOPIPv4=1" in /etc/orbitrc. As always, check the user.* syslog for details on problems gconfd encountered. There can only be one gconfd per home directory, and it must own a lockfile in ~/.gconfd and also lockfiles in individual storage locations such as ~/.gconf Same for /schemas/apps/gcalctool/base, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/display, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/mode, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/showzeroes, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/showhelp, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/showregisters, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/righthanded, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/trigtype, /schemas/apps/gcalctool/beep. Also there was this: Resolved address "xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults" to a read-only configuration source at position 0 None of the resolved addresses are writable; saving configuration settings will not be possible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 18:55:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131855.k3DIt4lh017564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-13 14:54 EST ------- Hmm, I will investigate this after the spring break. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 19:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131903.k3DJ3x6x020143@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 15:03 EST ------- [builder at dhcp83-49 SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core/result/gcalctool-5.7.32-2.x86_64.rpm W: gcalctool non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas W: gcalctool one-line-command-in-%post scrollkeeper-update W: gcalctool one-line-command-in-%postun scrollkeeper-update [builder at dhcp83-49 SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result/gcalctool-5.7.32-2.i386.rpm W: gcalctool non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas W: gcalctool one-line-command-in-%post scrollkeeper-update W: gcalctool one-line-command-in-%postun scrollkeeper-update Package builds w/ mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 19:11:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131911.k3DJB5p2021493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 19:26:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131926.k3DJQ51j024892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|188769 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 19:47:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131947.k3DJlh5d031876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 15:47 EST ------- Good: - Builds w/ mock Bad: - no ldconfig in %posts - unversioned library must go in -devel package - Header files not in -devel package (not completely necessary) - no %doc for README, NEWS, etc... - .desktop file not installed properly via desktop-file-install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 19:49:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131949.k3DJntV6032351@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|188769 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 19:50:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604131950.k3DJoxkC032664@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 20:27:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] New: Review Request: contacts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 Summary: Review Request: contacts Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: david at lovesunix.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/contacts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/contact-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Contacts is a tiny standalone application to view contact data available via evolution-data-server Be gentle, this is my first venture into SPEC authoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 21:17:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132117.k3DLHQ7N019824@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 17:17 EST ------- So, a few things going on here in the spec that should be looked at: - Source url should not use macros - PreReq seems a bit odd, why the Pre and the regular Req? - Use of defines at the top seems a bit much. Why define it to use it in only one place? (one place if you don't hard specify Requires) - Hard specified Requires, rpm should be able to figure this out on its own - Graphical app but no .desktop file - Files section is referencing directories rather than files within directories. Other than that its a good start (; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 21:23:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132123.k3DLNomc021438@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 17:23 EST ------- Whoops, macro in Source url is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 21:34:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132134.k3DLYC15024256@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-04-13 17:33 EST ------- I fixed the obvious stuff, thank you for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 21:36:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132136.k3DLaGjk024818@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-04-13 17:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=127729) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=127729&action=view) SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 21:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132152.k3DLqKqv028108@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 17:51 EST ------- rpmlint fails. Haven't looked much past this: W: gnome-utils summary-ended-with-dot GNOME utility programs. W: gnome-utils incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.14.0-5 2.14.0-2 E: gnome-utils binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-dictionary ['/usr/lib64'] E: gnome-utils binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/gnome-dictionary-applet ['/usr/lib64'] W: gnome-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-search-tool.schemas W: gnome-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/logview.schemas W: gnome-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/gnome-system-log W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-utils.h W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/gdict-1.0.pc W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-source.h W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-entry.h W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-version.h W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-enum-types.h W: gnome-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-dictionary.schemas W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict.h W: gnome-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/gnome-system-log W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-context.h W: gnome-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-screenshot.schemas W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-source-loader.h W: gnome-utils no-dependency-on usermode W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-client-context.h W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gdict-1.0/gdict/gdict-defbox.h W: gnome-utils devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libgdict-1.0.so W: gnome-utils non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec E: gnome-utils shell-syntax-error-in-%post 32bit's only E's are the shell-syntax-error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 22:59:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132259.k3DMxpRa006821@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-13 18:59 EST ------- The desktop file needs to have some bits changed specific for Fedora. You need to add this to the %install section: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop And in the %files section the desktop file needs to be: %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 23:06:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132306.k3DN6djH007897@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-13 19:06 EST ------- David, is the link to your spec file valid? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 23:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132314.k3DNEw9J009224@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-13 19:14 EST ------- Whoops, forgot to mention in comment #5, that you can drop the BuildRequires for glib2-devel and gtk2-devel,since the libglade2-devel package will pull these in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 13 23:31:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604132331.k3DNVmbu012264@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-04-13 19:31 EST ------- Thank you for the review Brian.. yes the link is valid. I updated the spec file to include the changes you suggested and uploaded new versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 00:12:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140012.k3E0Cbv1020483@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-13 20:12 EST ------- I have to admit that I am somewhat sceptic regarding some of the rpmlint warnings. I do not think .schemas files should be conffiles, and I have no idea whats wrong about a one-line %post script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 00:16:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140016.k3E0GTPe021374@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-13 20:16 EST ------- Do we really want to split this into three packages ? - the app - the library - the -devel It was my understanding that we sometimes don't bother to do that for small packages. But if it is the policy to always do these splits, then I'm happy to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 00:25:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140025.k3E0P0qR023215@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-13 20:24 EST ------- E: gnome-utils binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath I didn't get this error. E: gnome-utils shell-syntax-error-in-%post I got this one, but I was not able to figure out what it complains about Regarding the warnings about conffiles and devel files, it is not clear to me that the /etc files listed here should be conffiles, and if we split off -libs and -devel packages on principle... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 00:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140025.k3E0P7VS023264@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-04-13 20:24 EST ------- Personally, I think it's overkill and that we probably will want to revisit that policy as we start following the same thing everywhere. This will become especially true when we want to use the existence of a -devel subpackage to key that a package should be included as a multilib package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 00:29:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140029.k3E0TqpI024171@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-04-13 20:29 EST ------- We definitely don't split off -libs on principle and -devel is also questionable in cases where there really isn't a library being provided that we'd "want" people to develop against. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 02:36:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140236.k3E2aB8B013649@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 22:35 EST ------- OH right, I forgot to note that those are PASSES of rpmlint, not failures (; So just the other issues should be looked into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 02:38:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140238.k3E2cGMn014181@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 22:37 EST ------- I agree w/ jeremy. I can let this package go through w/out a -devel package. The other issues still apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 02:42:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140242.k3E2g7ic014779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 22:41 EST ------- We'll have to adjust the Packaging Guidelines and Review Guidelines regarding devel and lib packages. I can let those go through. I also don't know what its talking about for the error on x86_64, I'll try to get more info on that. And as far as the %post goes, if it executes w/out issues I think we can accept those too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 03:37:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] New: Review Request: libGLw Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 Summary: Review Request: libGLw Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/libGLw/libGLw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/libGLw/libGLw-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: libGLw is a library for Xaw and Motif OpenGL widgets. Currently it's built as one of the products of the 'mesa' package in core. This is foolish for a number of reasons: - The lib is _extremely_ stable, bumping it for every Mesa release is needless churn - No packages in core (or extras!) depend on libGLw - libGLw introduces a dependency on openmotif, which I would like to move out of core, because it's no longer 1996. Upon acceptance into extras I'll be happy to remove it from the core Mesa build and update the Requires/Obsoletes appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 03:46:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140346.k3E3kY2I023996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-13 23:46 EST ------- Now you need desktop-file-utils as a BuildRequires since you'll be using it in the %install section. I added that in a local copy of your spec and used that to build packages. Rpmlint output coming up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 04:46:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140446.k3E4kunk032678@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-14 00:46 EST ------- rpmlint is silent, no problems. So fix the BuildRequires and I think we're in business. I just have to lookup how to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 06:52:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188979] New: Review Request: rhythmbox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188979 Summary: Review Request: rhythmbox Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: pavel.sefranek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description: please compile rhythmbox with tag editing support. This can be enabled by passing --enable-tag-writing to configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 07:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140730.k3E7Uvgv025220@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-14 03:30 EST ------- Some quick comments after looking at the spec: * It would be better to have your real name on the bug report. Not a big deal, it is in the spec anyway. * the Buildroot is no the right one http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 * no need to conditionalize openmotif support, it should always be true in fedora extras * the non free file shouldn't be distributed. what I do in such cases is provide with a script in SourceXX that unpack the upstream tarball, remove the offending files and repack, such that a reviewer can easily reproduce what you did in the SOURCES directory. An example where I do that is grads (with the script grads-remove-files and the list of files grads-removed-files-list) although you could do more simply since you only have one file to remove. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 07:48:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140748.k3E7mutZ029323@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-14 03:48 EST ------- Another remark, maybe BuildRequires: mesa-libGL-devel should be BuildRequires: libGL-devel but I haven't really investigated if there is a need for the mesa implementation or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 08:21:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 04:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604140821.k3E8Lon4004071@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-14 04:21 EST ------- 2 more comments: * You should add to %docs Mesa-6.5/src/glw/README as it contains the licence. * I am not convinced that it is right to make a source package out of a whole package by taking only bits of what is in the tarball while the remaining is in another source package. May be worth asking on the extras list. Couldn't the upstream project be convinced to split the tarball? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 10:55:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 06:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604141055.k3EAtdFX002765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-04-14 06:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > rpmlint is silent, no problems. So fix the BuildRequires and I think we're in > business. I just have to lookup how to sponsor you. You don't have sponsor permissions. The list of sponsors is here: https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/dump-group.cgi?group=cvsextras&role_type=sponsor&format=html I'm willing to sponsor this though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 13:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 09:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604141350.k3EDoKY0000852@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 14:54:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188997] New: Review Request: magic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188997 Summary: Review Request: magic Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: nomis80 at nomis80.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nomis80.org/rpms/SPECS/magic.spec SRPM URL: http://nomis80.org/rpms/SRPMS/magic-7.4.13-1.src.rpm Description: Magic is a venerable VLSI layout tool, written in the 1980's at Berkeley by John Ousterhout, now famous primarily for writing the scripting interpreter language Tcl. Due largely in part to its liberal Berkeley open-source license, magic has remained popular with universities and small companies. The open-source license has allowed VLSI engineers with a bent toward programming to implement clever ideas and help magic stay abreast of fabrication technology. However, it is the well thought-out core algorithms which lend to magic the greatest part of its popularity. Magic is widely cited as being the easiest tool to use for circuit layout, even for people who ultimately rely on commercial tools for their product design flow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 15:08:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604141508.k3EF8dfY016638@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-04-14 11:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * the non free file shouldn't be distributed. what I do in such > cases is provide with a script in SourceXX that unpack the upstream > tarball, remove the offending files and repack, such that a reviewer > can easily reproduce what you did in the SOURCES directory. An example > where I do that is grads (with the script grads-remove-files and the > list of files grads-removed-files-list) although you could do more simply > since you only have one file to remove. That feels like such overkill. I'll give it a shot though. > * I am not convinced that it is right to make a source package out of a > whole package by taking only bits of what is in the tarball while the > remaining is in another source package. May be worth asking on the extras > list. Couldn't the upstream project be convinced to split the tarball? No, they can't. This battle has been fought and lost before. We already slice up the default build of Mesa, since we don't use its libglut for being non-free. Other changes applied, along with some fixed %package statements to make the binary rpm not be named libGLw-libGLw-*. New versions uploaded to the same URLs as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 15:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604141515.k3EFFAFI017651@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-04-14 11:15 EST ------- Updated.. hopefully this is the final go at this untill Chris releases 0.2 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 16:16:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189004] New: Review Request: irsim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189004 Summary: Review Request: irsim Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: nomis80 at nomis80.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nomis80.org/rpms/SPECS/irsim.spec SRPM URL: http://nomis80.org/rpms/SRPMS/irsim-9.7.21-1.src.rpm Description: IRSIM is a tool for simulating digital circuits. It is a "switch-level" simulator; that is, it treats transistors as ideal switches. Extracted capacitance and lumped resistance values are used to make the switch a little bit more realistic than the ideal, using the RC time constants to predict the relative timing of events. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 17:18:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] New: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: shahms at shahms.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools.spec SRPM URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools-0.7-1.src.rpm Description: BzrTools is a collection of plugins for Bazaar-NG (bzr). Among the included plugins are: * push - uses rsync to push local changes to a remote server * annotate - prints a file annotated with the revision next to each line * baz-import - (Requres PyBaz) import an arch archive losslessly into bzr * shelve/unshelve - allows you to undo some changes, commit, and restore * clean-tree - remove unknown, ignored-junk, or unversioned files from the tree * graph-ancestry - use dot to produce banch ancestry graphs * shell - a bzr command interpreter with command completion * patch - apply a patch to your tree from a file or URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 17:21:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189010] New: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: shahms at shahms.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz.spec SRPM URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: PyBaz provides Python bindings for manipulating GNU Arch and Bazaar archives and repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 17:36:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] New: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: shahms at shahms.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-sqlalchemy.spec SRPM URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-sqlalchemy-0.1.6-1.src.rpm Description: SQLAlchemy is an Object Relational Mappper (ORM) that provides a flexible, high-level interface to SQL databases. Database and domain concepts are decoupled, allowing both sides maximum flexibility and power. SQLAlchemy provides a powerful mapping layer that can work as automatically or as manually as you choose, determining relationships based on foreign keys or letting you define the join conditions explicitly, to bridge the gap between database and domain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:05:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604142305.k3EN5QkR004374@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-14 19:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > That feels like such overkill. I'll give it a shot though. If you speak about the idea of a script to remove the file, I agree but if it is about removing the file I disagree. A non free file cannot be included in a fedora extra srpm. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#head-0977d53a9aaae33e484bc92e8504bf0a3ef85e52 > No, they can't. This battle has been fought and lost before. We already slice > up the default build of Mesa, since we don't use its libglut for being non-free. It is not slicing, it is removing a non free part. But anyway I don't feel competent enough for this issue to have an interesting point of view - and because of that issue I don't want to assign that bug to me. But somebody with an idea on that subject may come and advise, otherwise I believe it should be an interesting issue to post on the fedora-extras list. > Other changes applied, along with some fixed %package statements to make the > binary rpm not be named libGLw-libGLw-*. New versions uploaded to the same URLs > as before. It may be better to bump the release and provide a new srpm, with a changelog entry stating the differences coming from the review process except when changes are very small. You can have a look at other fedora extras review for examples. I'll try to comment on all the other issues, however. Here are the comments: * remove the server name (internap) from the source url * with_dri isn't set anywhere... It certainly should be 0 or 1. As is, it leads to an error in the target script: ++ ./redhat-mesa-target '%{with_dri}' i386 ./redhat-mesa-target: line 14: [: %{with_dri}: integer expression expected * currently the mesa-6.5-build-config.patch doesn't lead to the wanted effects, because, due to the error above, the configs/linux file is used instead of configs/linux-dri * the CFLAGS used are not those from the RPM_OPT_FLAGS, but those defined in configs/linux. Maybe the CFLAGS line should be removed in the mesa-6.5-build-config.patch (whatever the right file config file is). * rpmlint complains that in my opinion should be acted upon: W: libGLw summary-ended-with-dot Xaw / Motif OpenGL widgets. W: libGLw incoherent-version-in-changelog 6.5-1 1.0-1 E: libGLw-devel obsolete-not-provided Mesa-devel E: libGLw-devel obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel E: libGLw-devel obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel E: libGLw-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libGLw.so * rpmlint complains that should in my opinion be ignored: W: libGLw invalid-license MIT/X11 W: libGLw strange-permission redhat-mesa-target 0755 * Are the Obsolete really necessary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189039] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189039 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable/perl-Module-Pluggable.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Pluggable-2.97-1.src.rpm Description: Provides a simple but, hopefully, extensible way of having 'plugins' for your module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:45:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189040] New: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189040 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Object-Accessor/perl-Object-Accessor.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Object-Accessor-0.12-1.src.rpm Description: Object::Accessor provides an interface to create per object accessors (as opposed to per Class accessors, as, for example, Class::Accessor provides). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:49:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189041] New: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-IPC-Cmd/perl-IPC-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-IPC-Cmd-0.24-1.src.rpm Description: IPC::Cmd allows you to run commands, interactively if desired, platform independent but have them still work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:52:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] New: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Archive-Extract/perl-Archive-Extract.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Archive-Extract-0.08-1.src.rpm Description: Archive::Extract is a generic archive extraction mechanism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:54:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604142354.k3ENsKO0012771@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188505, 188523, 188527, | |189041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:55:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189041] Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604142355.k3ENt8dB012934@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189042 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 14 23:59:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] New: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-Fetch/perl-File-Fetch.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-Fetch-0.07-1.src.rpm Description: File::Fetch is a generic file fetching mechanism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:00:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150000.k3F00Ott013912@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188505, 188523, 188527, | |189041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189041] Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150000.k3F00lUG013975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189043 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:08:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Message Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Message/perl-Log-Message.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Message-0.01-1.src.rpm Description: Log::Message is a generic message storage mechanism. It allows you to store messages on a stack -- either shared or private -- and assign meta-data to it. Some meta-data will automatically be added for you, like a timestamp and a stack trace, but some can be filled in by the user, like a tag by which to identify it or group it, and a level at which to handle the message (for example, log it, or die with it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:09:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150009.k3F09Xe0015391@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188505, 188519, 188523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:12:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Message-Simple/perl-Log-Message-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Log-Message-Simple-0.01-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides standardized logging facilities using the Log::Message module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:13:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150013.k3F0DmrT016017@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188523, 189044 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:14:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150014.k3F0EAhm016063@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189046 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:15:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] New: Review Request: perl-Term-UI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Term-UI/perl-Term-UI.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Term-UI-0.12-1.src.rpm Description: Term::UI is a transparent way of eliminating the overhead of having to format a question and then validate the reply, informing the user if the answer was not proper and re-issuing the question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:20:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150020.k3F0KGgI017139@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188505, 188523, 189044, | |189046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150020.k3F0KSuo017180@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189047 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150020.k3F0Kp97017253@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189047 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:25:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] New: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-CPANPLUS/perl-CPANPLUS.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-CPANPLUS-0.061-1.src.rpm Description: The CPANPLUS library is an API to the CPAN mirrors and a collection of interactive shells, commandline programs, daemons, etc, that use this API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:34:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150034.k3F0YIig019784@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188505, 188519, 188523, | |188527, 189040, 189041, | |189042, 189043, 189044, | |189047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:34:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150034.k3F0YTAa019814@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189048 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:34:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150034.k3F0Yfwl019870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189048 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:35:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150035.k3F0Z3N8020008@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189048 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:35:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189040] Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150035.k3F0Z4Eg020029@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189040 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189048 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:35:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189041] Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150035.k3F0Znru020235@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189048 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 00:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150036.k3F0a0Sv020318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189048 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 03:24:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189039] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150324.k3F3OtGj011338@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189039 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-14 23:24 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: f118696802530ecb4fdaf91f9b904136 Module-Pluggable-2.97.tar.gz f118696802530ecb4fdaf91f9b904136 Module-Pluggable-2.97.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 03:51:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189040] Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150351.k3F3pAaE015810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189040 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-14 23:50 EST ------- Issues: Requires: perl(Params::Check) >= 0.23 is redundant; RPM finds the requirement on its own, leading to a duplicate in the requires list. I believe we all decided that this was a blocker. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 722421fcbe2a18facd056ea6edb1be4f Object-Accessor-0.12.tar.gz 722421fcbe2a18facd056ea6edb1be4f Object-Accessor-0.12.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 04:08:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189041] Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150408.k3F48oFE018096@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 00:08 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 9061bd187defad873432f91fa6de9f9b IPC-Cmd-0.24.tar.gz 9061bd187defad873432f91fa6de9f9b IPC-Cmd-0.24.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 05:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150500.k3F50lGU026098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 01:00 EST ------- I wonder what this is about: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01_Archive-Extract....ok 162/617 skipped: No buffers available All tests successful, 162 subtests skipped. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 1e5d21e4dcd52e168eb2d660e44a48a6 Archive-Extract-0.08.tar.gz 1e5d21e4dcd52e168eb2d660e44a48a6 Archive-Extract-0.08.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 06:27:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150627.k3F6Rqxf006537@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 02:27 EST ------- Issues: Three buildrequires duplicate what RPM detects automatically. In the changelog I see that you deleted one duplicate Requires: statement; why that one and not the three others. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 53135c09fa15e9cb0a980b153b9634e0 File-Fetch-0.07.tar.gz 53135c09fa15e9cb0a980b153b9634e0 File-Fetch-0.07.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is (essentially) not present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 06:49:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604150649.k3F6ng1p010472@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 02:49 EST ------- One warning from the tests; from a quick code inspection I think this is an upstream bug. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01_Log-Message-Config....ok t/02_Log-Message...........Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at t/02_Log-Message.t line 87. ok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=34, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.18 CPU) Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: f04298e81488a5a39930fd417d47656e Log-Message-0.01.tar.gz f04298e81488a5a39930fd417d47656e Log-Message-0.01.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 16:51:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151651.k3FGpQsI015849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 12:51 EST ------- Some warnings running the tests; nothing serious but it should probably be reported upstream: t/03_functions....Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 54. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/03_functions.t line 73. ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=97, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.21 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.27 CPU) Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 0c60795da495f6a79d09362e8b4f0061 Log-Message-Simple-0.01.tar.gz 0c60795da495f6a79d09362e8b4f0061 Log-Message-Simple-0.01.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 16:52:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151652.k3FGqW3n016053@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 12:52 EST ------- Oops, forgot to add: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 17:13:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151713.k3FHDUdM019136@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 13:13 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: b34442df078685f3e8b1197e1e98d1e6 Term-UI-0.12.tar.gz b34442df078685f3e8b1197e1e98d1e6 Term-UI-0.12.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 17:37:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151737.k3FHbCLq023224@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-15 13:36 EST ------- I think we just need to work out perl-Object-Accessor and perl-File-Fetch and then I can review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 18:03:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Info Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Info/perl-Module-Info.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Info-0.290-1.src.rpm Description: Module::Info gives you information about Perl modules without actually loading the module. It actually isn't specific to modules and should work on any perl code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 18:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189081] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Prereq/perl-Test-Prereq.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Prereq-1.030-1.src.rpm Description: The prereq_ok() function examines the modules it finds in blib/lib/, blib/script, and the test files it finds in t/ (and test.pl). It figures out which modules they use, skips the modules that are in the Perl core, and compares the remaining list of modules to those in the PREREQ_PM section of Makefile.PL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 18:09:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189081] Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151809.k3FI9l8B028778@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 18:09:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151809.k3FI9wbS028841@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189081 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 19:26:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189084] New: Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189084 Summary: Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNames/perl-Graphics-ColorNames.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-1.06-1.src.rpm Description: This module defines RGB values for common color names. The intention is to (1) provide a common module that authors can use with other modules to specify colors; and (2) free module authors from having to "re-invent the wheel" whenever they decide to give the users the option of specifying a color by name rather than RGB value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 19:27:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189084] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151927.k3FJROOx013386@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189084 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 19:27:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189081] Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604151927.k3FJRZ8D013467@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189084 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 21:32:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] New: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rjune at bravegnuworld.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com I do not have a sponsor for this. Both SRPM and RPM pass rpmlint with no errors, and I checked it against my previous submission. The only thing I'm not 100% on is %{_datadir}/*/*/*/* in the %files section. knemo.spec: http://home.bravegnuworld.com/~rjune/rpm/SPECS/knemo.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bravegnuworld.com/~rjune/rpm/SRPMS/knemo-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: A network monitor application for KDE. It's very similar to windows Network monitor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 15 23:00:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189040] Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604152300.k3FN03OC014840@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189040 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-15 18:59 EST ------- RPM doesn't pick up the versioned dep. While I'd prefer to keep the explicit versioned dep, here it is without: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Object-Accessor-0.12-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 16 00:22:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189091] New: Review Request: boo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189091 Summary: Review Request: boo Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo-0.7.5.2003-1 Description: Boo is an OO scripting language for the CLI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 16 00:22:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] New: Review Request: boo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 Summary: Review Request: boo Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo-0.7.5.2013-1 Description: Boo is an OO scripting language for the CLI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 16 00:24:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] New: Review Request: mono-debugger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mono-debugger-0.12-1.src.rpm Description: mono-debugger is a debugger for mono which can be executed from either the command line or as part of MonoDevelop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 16 00:27:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189091] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604160027.k3G0R54H027493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189091 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-15 20:27 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 189092 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 16 00:27:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604160027.k3G0RG2a027512@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-15 20:27 EST ------- *** Bug 189091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 16 05:01:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189040] Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604160501.k3G51nPK004140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189040 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-16 01:01 EST ------- For some reason I recall that it was decided that we shouldn't allow the duplicate requires, but now I can't find a reference. I seem to remember that you were in on the discussion, but if you don't remember then my mind must be playing tricks on me. I personally don't have any problem with it since RPM won't determine versioned perl dependencies on its own, so I'll go ahead and approve this. I do think it's worth clarifying. APPROVED. Just check in the version you prefer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 16 05:04:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604160504.k3G54w9C004397@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-16 01:04 EST ------- In light of other discussion I'll drop my objection. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 15:42:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188979] Review Request: rhythmbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171542.k3HFg4EF007425@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rhythmbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188979 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |rhythmbox AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |cmontgom at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-04-17 11:41 EST ------- Assigning to package. package-review is not the appropriate place for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 16:48:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171648.k3HGmdar022410@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-17 12:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo-0.7.5.2013-2.src.rpm Small fix to the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 16:52:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189149] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189149 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mod_mono.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mod_mono-1.1.14-1.src.rpm Description: mod_mono is an Apache module which allows Apache to serve up ASP.NET pages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 16:52:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] New: Review Request: mod_mono Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 Summary: Review Request: mod_mono Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mod_mono.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mod_mono-1.1.14-1.src.rpm Description: mod_mono is an Apache module which allows Apache to serve up ASP.NET pages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 17:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189149] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171705.k3HH5jhi026248@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189149 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|package name here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-17 13:05 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 189150 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 17:05:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171705.k3HH5kEN026279@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-17 13:05 EST ------- *** Bug 189149 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 17:07:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188775] Mass CC change s/fedora-extras-list/fedora-package-review/ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171707.k3HH7PIY027525@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Mass CC change s/fedora-extras-list/fedora-package-review/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188775 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com dkl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.18 ------- Additional Comments From dkl at redhat.com 2006-04-17 13:07 EST ------- Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 17:15:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171715.k3HHFlPo029424@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|188769 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 17:28:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189157] New: Review Request: aspell-he Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189157 Summary: Review Request: aspell-he Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: danken at cs.technion.ac.il QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ivrix.org.il/redhat/aspell-he.spec SRPM URL: http://ivrix.org.il/redhat/aspell-he-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: Provides the word list/dictionaries for Hebrew. Now that Fedora Core moved to aspell 0.60, we can add a package for Hebrew (from the Hspell project) into Fedora Extras. Actually, it may well go into Fedora Core, and sit besides its peers, but this is not for me to decide. Note that this package does not pass rpmlint quietly, much like the French package from which I copied its spec. I might be mistaken, but I think that rpmlint is a bit too picky here. It is angry because the binary package is architecture-dependent, yet includes no executable - only compressed list of words. Still, this compressed list *is*, as I believe, architecture-dependent and should be marked as such. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 17:45:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171745.k3HHjXaU004743@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-17 13:45 EST ------- Good: - Package builds w/ mock on 32 and 64bit - rpmlint is silent. Bad: - Missing autoconf as a BuildRequires Question: Would the postun and post cause scrollkeeper-update to run 2x each time this package is upgraded? Once for the install and once for the removal? If so, shouldn't this be logic wrapped so that the postun call only happens when it is flat out removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 18:58:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171858.k3HIwOCg004193@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-17 14:58 EST ------- New spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gcalctool.spec New srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gcalctool-5.7.32-3.src.rpm changes: - disable schema installation during %install - install schema in %post - added Requires for gconf - I did not try yo fix the (harmless) scrollkeeper error messages during %install, since the configure does not understand --disable-scrollkeeper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 18:59:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171859.k3HIx9FD004364@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-17 14:58 EST ------- New spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gucharmap.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gucharmap-1.6.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 19:01:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171901.k3HJ1gFh005161@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-17 15:01 EST ------- new spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/zenity.spec new srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/zenity-2.14.1-3.src.rpm changes: add BuildRequires: autoconf We certainly could do better with the scrollkeeper-update thing, but that is not the current practise. In general, having a working transaction-hook would be nice on many counts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 19:53:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171953.k3HJrfea024198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-17 15:53 EST ------- New spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gucharmap.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gucharmap-1.6.0-4.src.rpm Jeremy convinced me to split off a -devel package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 19:53:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604171953.k3HJraSN024153@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 yaneti at declera.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-04-17 15:53 EST ------- There are packaging guidelines you know. Including scriptlet snippets: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets and specifically one for scrollkeeper: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-3c9f517f0cd4aaabb369a8805226d85dc2f02793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 20:40:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172040.k3HKeUA0007965@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-17 16:40 EST ------- Changes look sane, rpmlint much quieter, package builds w/ mock. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 20:41:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172041.k3HKf2IK008230@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-17 16:40 EST ------- I have the fu to sponsor now, so David you'll need to go through the steps at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors to create your account so I can sponsor it. Also, the srpm you list isn't reachable, I did tests by using the upstream tarball w/ your spec. For prosperity you might want to resolve that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 20:41:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172041.k3HKfqM4008813@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|188946 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 20:59:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172059.k3HKxYnU016499@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-04-17 16:59 EST ------- My webhost seems to have been down for a brief period. sorry about that. I'm having an issue with the user system, it has gotten in a state where on one hand it doesn't know a user registered to david at lovesunix.net, yet claims that one is already registered to that addy when I try to register again. Could someone please look at that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 21:20:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172120.k3HLKhdF026065@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-17 17:20 EST ------- Still not using desktop-file-install to install the .desktop file in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 21:34:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172134.k3HLY0Ui031368@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-17 17:33 EST ------- Yes, it appears that this package needs to follow the guidelines for scrollkeeper. Specifcally the Requires(pre) and Requires(post). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 21:39:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172139.k3HLdovY001833@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-17 17:39 EST ------- Also missing: Requires(post): scrollkeeper, gconftool Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils, scrollkeeper Also, check out the guidelines concerning gconf usage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-ff64cd482595764f672082d5a3b83e1fc22962e8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 21:43:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172143.k3HLhvcC003707@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-17 17:43 EST ------- Also review guidelines for desktop-database scriptlets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-d37d740d062d3aa6013aab44a79de88a6c1fe533 Requires(post) and Requires(postun) do need to be filled out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 21:47:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172147.k3HLlv3c005063@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-17 17:47 EST ------- You've also got some unnecessary BuildRequirements. glib2-devel, gtk2-devel, libglade2-devel can all be dropped since libgnomecanvas-devel will pull these all in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 21:52:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172152.k3HLqJUx006609@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-17 17:51 EST ------- You've also go some unnecessary BuildRequires. libX11-devel, glib2-devel, gtk2-devel, libgnome-devel, and libgnomeui-devel will all be pulled in by gnome-desktop-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 22:01:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172201.k3HM1KtK009647@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-17 18:01 EST ------- Steven, Before starting the review could you make the following changes: * update to version 0.30 * replace perl by %{__perl} (better consistency) * drop the line "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d ..." as it it not needed for noarch perl packages tia, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 17 22:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187932] Review Request: paraview - Parallel visualization application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604172229.k3HMTrq7016577@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paraview - Parallel visualization application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187932 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-04-17 18:29 EST ------- Checked in. Added to owners.list Builds are on their way. Needed to exclude ppc for now due to gcc ICE (bug #189160). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:06:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180106.k3I16Vmu017380@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lyz27 at yahoo.com 2006-04-17 21:05 EST ------- The boo spec needed to be modified to use the -root option for gacutil. for lib in bin/Boo.Lang.dll bin/Boo.Lang.Useful.dll bin/Boo.Lang.Compiler.dll bin/Boo.Lang.Parser.dll bin/Boo.Lang.Interpreter.dll bin/Boo.Lang.CodeDom.dll bin/pt/Boo.Lang.resources.dll; do gacutil -i ${lib} -f -package boo -root ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}; done Unfortunatly.. It still doesn't work as [root at localhost /]# cat `which booc` #!/bin/sh env /usr/bin/mono /usr/lib/boo/booc.exe "$@" doesn't work as the exe is under /usr/lib64/boo not /usr/lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chrisw at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/git/review/perl-Email-Valid.spec SRPM URL: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/chrisw/git/review/perl-Email-Valid-0.15-1.src.rpm Description: Perl module to check validity of Internet email addresses This perl module is used by part of git which is currently not being built (due to this dependency). Also, for license I marked it as Artistic, same as perl, since the module simply states: This module is free software; you may redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:13:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180113.k3I1D47o019552@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-04-17 21:13 EST ------- I'll try to look into this soon. In the meantime, I think someone might ping the RH bugzilla guy to take a look as well. A couple questions: 1) why use a CVS tarball instead of a release? 2) BuildArch: is sufficient. No need to spell Architecture out. Also, rpmlint doesn't throw any warnings or errors so that is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:24:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188623] Review Request: SOAPpy - Full-featured SOAP library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180124.k3I1O0ER022778@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SOAPpy - Full-featured SOAP library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188623 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-17 21:23 EST ------- All MUST and SHOULD items have been addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:28:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180128.k3I1SqEC024448@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: torque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-package- |fedora-extras- |review at redhat.com |list at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-04-17 21:28 EST ------- The SRPM [please note the "6" instead of "5" in release tag since the SRPM URL in comment #14 has a typo] at: http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/torque-2.1.0p0-0.6.200604171430cvs.src.rpm sha1sum: ba0a569763d6b91697c9a40723b392be464ab64e does cleanup everything mentioned in comments #12--13 and heres the remainder of the review: very minor nit: + please consider adding the "-q" option to %setup so that the build logs are a little shorter and more readable (just a request--by no means a blocker!) good: OK - source matches upstream OK - macro usage looks consistent although there are some harmless quirks like having both %__rm and %{__rm} OK - proper use of -devel OK - desktop files appear to have correct install syntax OK - scriptlets look sane to me OK - installed and runs with out seg-faulting on a single FC4 i386 machine (I do need to go dig up the syntax for creating default queues, etc. because a quick "qsub -I" seems to wait forever and I imagine its an incomplete setup and thus my fault. Other commands such as "pbsnodes -a" and "qmgr" work just fine--no segfaults.) I don't see any blockers so its APPROVED. Congrats on the first package and please feel free to contact me if you want any help with FE CVS, the build system, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180137.k3I1b7MG027410@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: torque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:41:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180141.k3I1f8pe028838@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-17 21:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > This module is free software; you may redistribute it and/or > modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. Perl is licensed "GPL or Artistic". Therefore it's common practice in Fedora to tag perl-dists using the sentence above as "License: GPL or Artistic". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 01:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180149.k3I1nbam031794@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 ------- Additional Comments From chrisw at redhat.com 2006-04-17 21:49 EST ------- Thanks, I updated to "GPL or Artistic" license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 02:27:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] New: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/sqlgrey.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/sqlgrey-1.7.3-2.src.rpm Description: Very easy to setup and use greylisting policy service for postfix MTA. This package isn't done, it requires some fixing: - convert spec file into UTF-8 - fix up the initrd script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 04:18:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180418.k3I4IX9w010816@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 00:18 EST ------- Jesse, why should I consider ScripletSnippets to be part of the packaging guidelines ? it is not even linked from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 04:24:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180424.k3I4Og1I012562@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-18 00:24 EST ------- You can drop the BuildRequires for glib2-devel, since the gtk2-devel package will pull this in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 04:26:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185288] Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180426.k3I4Qni0013178@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185288 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-18 00:26 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: W: libchmxx-debuginfo objdump-failed E: libchmxx-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib symlink, can ignore You need a %defattr on %files devel - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ([L]GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r Looking good otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 04:43:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180443.k3I4hiMb019022@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 00:43 EST ------- I know there are packaging guidelines, but I don't know how I am supposed to consider the ScriptletSnipplets page to be part of them. It isn't even linked from the Packaging/Guidelines page, so how should I even find it ?! I disagree wrt to the BuildRequires. A direct dependency should still be listed, even if it would also be pulled in indirectly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 04:45:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180445.k3I4j600019480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-04-18 00:44 EST ------- Regarding the widget_test example, there have been some major changes to the structure of the library itself. All the examples are good to go now; IPv6 support is now present for UDP and multicasting along with manipulation of IPv6 addresses including convenience wrappers for getaddrinfo() and gethostinfo() that work with std::string's. Despite the internal changes to the library itself, the spec hasn't changed much except for cleanup of the mentioned items in the review. The gtkmm widgets have also been split into a separate library (conexusgtkmm) and now also support IPv6 names. Should I submit conexusgtkmm as a separate package for review? The spec for conexusgtkmm is directly based on the previously reviewed spec, while the new conexus spec is the same with the gtkmm dependency removed and replaced by glibmm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 05:00:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] New: Review Request: horde - php application framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.1-9.src.rpm Description: horde is an application framework written in PHP. It is the foundation for IMP webmail, Kronolith web calendar, and many more (RPMS to follow, pending comments to this request) Currently, rpmlint generates several errors and warnings, most of which I was able to clean up with some perl, the rest of which I am ignoring (for now). Among them are: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile (all of horde resides in /usr/share, including its conf files) E: non-standard-gid apache (config files are 0640 root:apache, a sensible setup) E: non-readable 0640 (see above) E: non-standard-dir-perm 0750 (see above) E: htaccess-file (part of the horde distro, should I fedora-ize it to httpd/conf.d?) E: script-without-shellbang (Are we expected to fix upstream's mistakes like these?) E: non-executable-script 0644 (see above) Suggestions / comments are more than welcome on these or any other issues. I am currently trying to get my first package, php-shout, approved and in the system. Until that time, however, I am still a non-contributor. I have a sponsor working with me on php-shout, do I still need a sponsor for this package as well? After some feedback on this RPM, I will submit packages for horde applications (IMP, Turba, Kronolith, etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 09:25:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180925.k3I9PcOH023395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 05:25 EST ------- Apologies for "sitting" on this for too long. 0) Upstream are now using YYYY-MM to label download dirs at least, so I wonder if it is better to use 2005.03 say for the version. (eg Gentoo is using 2005.3) 1) rpmlint complains: W: hugs98 invalid-license BSDish, see License file, GPL, LGPL I think just calling it BSD would be sufficient. 2) There seems to a small build problem on fc5: : Compiling FFI stubs ../../../src/ffihugs -98 -P../../../hugsdir/packages/OpenAL: -i"HsOpenAL.h" ../../../hugsdir/packages/OpenAL/Sound/OpenAL/AL/Buffer.hs -Iinclude -DCALLCONV=ccall -lopenal runhugs: Error occurred ERROR "../../../hugsdir/packages/OpenAL/Sound/OpenAL/AL/BasicTypes.hs":70 - Undefined type constructor "HTYPE_ALCLAMPD" Skipping OpenAL package : but probably openal support is not that important and could be skipped for now on fc5. 3) Probably the description should be made more concise. 4) md5sum is good 5) buildrequires need to be updated for modular X: I attach a diff below. 6) builds fine with mock on fc4 and fc5 x86_64 7) Perhaps it is a good idea to configure --with-pthreads? 8) if demos/ (2.3MB) is to be included, it must be subpackaged into a separate subpackage (say hugs98-demos). Otherwise looks good to me. I think if at least 0, 1, 5, and 8 are addressed this package can be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 09:31:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] New: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/ghc-gtk2hs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10-1.src.rpm Description: Gtk2Hs is a Gtk binding for Haskell (ghc), featuring: * Automatic memory management. * Nearly complete coverage of the Gtk+ API. * Unicode support. * Extensive reference documentation. * Support for Linux, Windows, MacOS X and other Unix platforms. * Bindings for the cairo vector graphics library * Support for the Glade visual GUI builder (via libglade) * Bindings for some extra Gnome modules: o GConf, Gnome?s system for storing application preferences. o SourceView, a source code editor widget with syntax highlighting. * Bindings for the Mozilla browser rendering engine. Gtk2Hs is Free software licenced under the GNU LGPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 09:32:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180932.k3I9WYUR026400@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coldwell at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 05:32 EST ------- Perhaps the naming could/should be: emacs-muse, emacs-muse-common, emacs-muse-xemacs, etc? Well we need some kind of Fedora policy on how to package elisp IMHO. Some time ago tagoh suggested to me the idea of doing it the Debian way, ie bytecompiling at install time for the installed emacsen. Assuming emacs 22 doesn't get released soon, we may well see a emacs22 package in Extras soon too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 09:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175198] Review Request: perl-Math-Pari In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180933.k3I9XArA026608@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Pari https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175198 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-18 05:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > NeedsWork: > * the files libPARI.dumb.pod, Math::libPARI.dumb.3pm.gz are duplicates > of libPARI.pod, Math::libPARI.3pm.gz (ok, they have slightly different > formats) > (Easy fix - just remove the *dumb* files) Fixed in -2: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Math-Pari/perl-Math-Pari.spec http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Math-Pari/perl-Math-Pari-2.010704-2.fc5.src.rpm > Other minor notes: > * Would be nice to have Term::Gnuplot around to improve the test coverage Added to To-Do list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 09:34:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184000] Review Request: emacs-vm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180934.k3I9Y021026837@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-vm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184000 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coldwell at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 05:33 EST ------- Valid points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 09:40:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604180940.k3I9ecow029672@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://haskell.org/gtk2hs/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 12:09:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181209.k3IC9hMV010041@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-04-18 08:05 EST ------- * config files MUST not be under /usr; place them under /etc or /var (see below) * horde requires write access to the config files (they are editable through the web interface); so permissions should be 0660 for root:apache or even apache ownership. These files should be located under /var Perhaps location of the config files can be changed in the code, perhaps you have to use symlinks for that * the 'locale/*/horde.mo' files should be annotated with the corresponding %lang() tags; it would be probably the best to move them to the %regular /usr/share/locale and run '%find_lang horde' * docs/ should be removed and packaged like | %doc docs/* * it might be a good idea to restrict the initial visibility of Horde to localhost; e.g. by adding | | Allow from 127.0.0.1 | Deny from all | to the apache configuration. What is with the authentication during the initial setup? Is there a non-default password required for the 'Administrator' user? If not, some modifications shall be done to avoid that an unconfigured Horde installation can be run by unauthorized users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 12:19:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181219.k3ICJSXY013428@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 08:19 EST ------- Yet another version, adding more requires and also adding BuildRequires to make sure that the docs are being built. New spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gucharmap.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gucharmap-1.6.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 12:32:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188623] Review Request: SOAPpy - Full-featured SOAP library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181232.k3ICW6LK019232@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SOAPpy - Full-featured SOAP library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188623 tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 12:37:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181237.k3ICbAjl021620@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From avi at unix.sh 2006-04-18 08:37 EST ------- Any other comment after last revision on http://avi.alkalay.net/software/elektra/ ?? Anything left to move on ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 12:42:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181242.k3ICghg4024233@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-18 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I know there are packaging guidelines, but I don't know how I am supposed to > consider the ScriptletSnipplets page to be part of them. It isn't even linked from > the Packaging/Guidelines page, so how should I even find it ?! It' s the first sub-heading under Packaging Guidelines on the Fedora Extras page. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 12:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181246.k3ICkUi8025868@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 08:46 EST ------- Now go to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28guidelines%29%7C%28packaging%29 and tell me if you see a link there. Anyway http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/zenity.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/zenity-2.14.1-4.src.rpm has Requires(post) and Requires(postun) now (not pre and post, as comment #4 wrongly suggested) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 13:14:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181314.k3IDEsps003341@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-18 09:14 EST ------- Blocker: - Wrong doc dirs Further personal remarks: - The include file names are too generic to justfy installing them into $(includedir) - Way too many warnings to provide sufficient trust to allow it to be installed into /lib - IMO, installing DLLs to /lib is a fundamental design flaw. I refuse to approve any package doing so. Use ordinary, properly versioned shared libs, instead of trying to introduce DLL hell to the Linux bootsystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 13:22:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181322.k3IDM6Qd005461@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com webmaster at margo.bijoux.nom.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |webmaster at margo.bijoux.nom.b | |r ------- Additional Comments From webmaster at margo.bijoux.nom.br 2006-04-18 09:21 EST ------- In the latest srpm posted here, nagios-plugins-all requires nagios-plugins-httpd , but the plugin package is nagios-plugins-http. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 13:23:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181323.k3IDNR3a006011@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-04-18 09:23 EST ------- What are your objections against using common scriptlets? The fact that they are not linked directly I would consider a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 13:41:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181341.k3IDf7dT013655@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 09:40 EST ------- I have no objections to helpful hints. I do have objections to blindly following orders. What in particular do you think is amiss in the scriplets in my latest spec ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 13:44:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181344.k3IDiQ9T015175@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-18 09:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gnome-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/review/gnome-utils-2.14.0-6.src.rpm now with -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:01:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189219] New: Review Request: [Games SIG] poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189219 Summary: Review Request: [Games SIG] poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: tkmame at retrogames.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-eval.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-eval-130.0-2.src.rpm ** NOTE ** You may have to download src.rpm directly from: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ Description: This package is a free (GPL) toolkit for writing programs which simulate or analyze poker games. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:08:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181408.k3IE8FIV024214@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-18 10:07 EST ------- The real conflict with these two libraries is that they both create libraries with the basename of 'alogg'. If you're worried about conflicts, then renaming the spec file isn't enough. The packaging guidelines don't give an unambiguous answer about the name, however: "When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came." In this case, the upstream tarball and project name don't match. As a fallback: "If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the past, then you should try to match their name for consistency." In this case, I wasn't able to find any other distributions that package this particular library. I did find the other 'alogg' in Debian, however. I would interpret the guidelines to mean that this other alogg should get priority for the 'alogg' name, and Hans' choice to use AllegroOgg to match the upstream package name is entirely appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:11:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181411.k3IEBbSt025480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-04-18 10:11 EST ------- My first comment was ment as a hint. I realize now it could be considered snide. I apologize. Your scripts are just different than the ones on the common scriptlets page. I just don't consider the realm of sciptlets in packaging for a widely used common distribution base an appropriate place for creative differences. Every such difference makes cornercases for everyone and everything that tries to deal with these specs. Be it human or automatic. If you have objections against the common scriptlets why not discuss them rather than creating yet another variety. But thats just me. Anal retentive if you wish.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:24:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181424.k3IEOMBc030481@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-18 10:23 EST ------- Changes look good. THe scripletsnippets is referential for now, as it is not linked. That would have to be approved by the board. I mostly wanted you to be aware it was there and take a look at what pertains to this package. I see no show stoppers, but at some point you might want to narrow down the scrollkeeper update call to a specific dir, but not necessary for initial release. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:28:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189224] New: Unable to Install additional software from Package Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189224 Summary: Unable to Install additional software from Package Manager Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i586 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: kandala_tarak at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description of problem: I have installed FC5 with only some basic installation and wanted to Install some more packages after the installation was complete. I tried to install by using Add/Remove Software from the Applications menu. After the Package Manager application opens, a dialog box opens which says "Retrieving Software Information". After some time I get an error which says "Unable to retrive software information" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login into root user 2. Naviage to Applications > Add/Remove Software Actual results: Error dialog box appears with information "Unable to retrieve software information" Expected results: A list of Packages installed in the system have to be displayed Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:30:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189224] Unable to Install additional software from Package Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181430.k3IEUkai001140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unable to Install additional software from Package Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189224 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:38:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181438.k3IEcGVt004879@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-18 10:37 EST ------- Changes look good, rpmlint is silent, package builds w/ mock. Scriptlets work even if they aren't EXACTLY like the suggested ones, thats passible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183888] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181446.k3IEkU04008726@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183888 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-18 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > W: perl-Crypt-RSA file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man3/Crypt::RSA.3pm.gz > > This is due to a single accented 'e' in the POD. "iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8" > should fix it up. Done in -2 > Artistic license is included, but not GPL. Not a blocker, but upstream should > probably be whacked. http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=18771 > I'm not sure what to do with the two files in extradocs. One of them is > referenced from the main manpage, but it also references an interoperability > table which doesn't seem to be included. One of the files *is* the aforementioned table. Not a lot in it really. I've converted both files to manpages using pod2man and installed them in the places you'd look for them if following the link from the main manpage. Revised spec: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-RSA/perl-Crypt-RSA.spec Revised SRPM: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-RSA/perl-Crypt-RSA-1.57-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 14:52:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181452.k3IEqVZr011518@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-18 10:52 EST ------- Changes sane. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 15:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181503.k3IF38ei015522@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-18 11:02 EST ------- Under the devel package don't you want to require gucharmap = %{version}-%{release}, instead of just the %version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 15:05:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181505.k3IF57XY016171@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-18 11:04 EST ------- Devel package should have Requires: gnome-utils = %{version}-%{release}, instead of just %version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 15:45:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] New: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: shahms at shahms.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-lxml.spec SRPM URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-lxml-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: lxml provides a Python binding to the libxslt and libxml2 libraries. It follows the ElementTree API as much as possible in order to provide a more Pythonic interface to libxml2 and libxslt than the default bindings. In particular, lxml deals with Python Unicode strings rather than encoded UTF-8 and handles memory management, unlike the default bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 16:42:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180149] Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181642.k3IGgXxG015847@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180149 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-18 12:42 EST ------- Updated. http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/edje-0.5.0.026-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 17:38:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189263] New: Review Request: rsibreak Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 Summary: Review Request: rsibreak Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wolters.liste at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/fedorarpms/rsibreak.spec SRPM URL: http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/fedorarpms/rsibreak-0.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: "RSIBreak is a small utility which bothers you at certain intervals. The interval and duration of two different timers can be configured. You can use the breaks to stretch out or do the dishes. The aim of this utility is to let you know when it is time to have a break from your computer. This can help people to prevent Repetive Strain Injury." I finished packaging it and appreciate comments. The only thing I am not satisfied yet it the group - Amusement/Graphics is not the best place, but I didn't find any group which is better. Btw.: I'm *not* sponsored yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 17:40:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186002] Review Request: python-archmod - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181740.k3IHeG96001186@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-archmod - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186002 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com shahms at shahms.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |shahms at shahms.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-04-18 13:40 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint gives no errors - builds in mach just fine - spec file and package name match (but see below) - GPL license, license included, etc. - md5sum matches upstream - it meets the rest of the MUST clauses The only "bad" thing I could find is that I don't think python-archmod is the most appropriate name as the python module itself is secondary to the binary functionality, if I'm not mistaken. It seems similar in this regard to bzr and yum, and should be named appropriately. Other than that, the package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 17:40:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189004] Review Request: irsim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181740.k3IHeS9a001460@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189004 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-18 13:40 EST ------- This appears to be a Tcl graphical app that can neither find Tcl nor X, and could use some BuildRequires for both: Can't find Tcl configuration script "tclConfig.sh" Reverting to non-Tcl compilation checking for X... no Cannot find X11---will attempt to compile anyway. Graphics options will be NULL only! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:03:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181803.k3II3uks010314@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-18 14:03 EST ------- Locales need to be handled with %find_lang macro as per the guidelines on the wiki. Missing URL, and Source0 is not a URL. If the source archive is publicly available or it has a web page these should be added. changelog is missing the version number, 1.0=1 in this case. rpmlint is complaining that usermode is not required, yet it is for the base package. You may want to move the Requires usermode to the gui subpackage for clarity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:13:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] New: Review Request: xscreensaver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xscreensaver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xscreensaver-4.99.2.3-3.src.rpm Description: XScreenSaver is the standard screen saver collection shipped on most Linux and Unix systems running the X11 Window System. More than 200 display modes are included in this package. On X11 systems, XScreenSaver is two things: it is both a large collection of screen savers; and it is also the framework for blanking and locking the screen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:13:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181813.k3IIDovS013647@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at poczta.fm 2006-04-18 14:13 EST ------- I have a problem... file /usr/bin/monop from install of bsd-games-2.17-3 conflicts with file from package mono-devel-1.1.13.4-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:17:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181817.k3IIHBTo014941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2006-04-18 14:16 EST ------- Yeah, the whole "put all executables in /usr/bin" thing turns out to not be such a keen idea after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:18:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183374] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181818.k3IIIBZ9015385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183374 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:18:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183889] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181818.k3IIIwoq015790@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183889 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:19:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181819.k3IIJsg8016320@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-18 14:19 EST ------- I don't have a problem with renaming it to m-poly or monop-game to remove the conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 18:31:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181831.k3IIV4Wd021086@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rstrode at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-18 14:30 EST ------- FC5 core has two X window locking system, gnome-screensaver and xscreensaver, and fedora core now prefers to use gnome-screensaver because it has some new mechanism such as udev and so on( I remember that this topic is argued on mailing list, but I forgot when and where) . So, Ray Strode, the current XScreenSaver maintainer (in core) has had a plan to move xscreensaver to Extras and has looked for a new maintainer ( in Extras ). I have already suggested to him that I take over the maintainership from him (by mail). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 19:01:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187799] Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181901.k3IJ15lh000933@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187799 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-18 15:00 EST ------- Disabled the test suite (I have no ideia why it fails in mock) SRPM: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Cairo-0.03-2.src.rpm Specfile: same link -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 19:07:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181907.k3IJ7pR3003313@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at poczta.fm 2006-04-18 15:07 EST ------- I have solved this problem and any other potential problems with renaming all binaries to bsd_* style, e.g. bsd_banner, bsd_monop etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 19:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181915.k3IJF8rd006081@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at poczta.fm 2006-04-18 15:14 EST ------- So, now is problem with bsd_rot13... $bsd_rot13 /usr/bin/bsd_rot13: line 39: /usr/bin/caesar: No such file or directory /usr/bin/bsd_rot13: line 39: exec: /usr/bin/caesar: cannot execute: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 19:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181918.k3IJI9Mw006887@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2006-04-18 15:17 EST ------- Well, you can patch that. But "bsd_rot13" is a lot less nice than just "rot13", which is a vaguely handy little utility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 19:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181919.k3IJJeuc007514@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-18 15:19 EST ------- You can't globally rename all of the applications because of these interdependencies, and I believe that some of the apps look at argv[0] to determine how to function. It's better to rename them on an as-needed basis only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 19:49:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604181949.k3IJnYnI018821@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at poczta.fm 2006-04-18 15:49 EST ------- It seems to me that only bsd_rot13 has a dependency with another bsd-games app. I think that patch only this app should fix all problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 20:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182007.k3IK7lU3026755@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2006-04-18 16:07 EST ------- I really don't like the precedent of renaming all the binaries in a classic package just because some new thing comes up with a binary with the same name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 21:17:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188351] Review Request: gphpedit - GNOME2 PHP editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182117.k3ILH25v026199@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gphpedit - GNOME2 PHP editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188351 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-04-18 17:17 EST ------- Upstream author has confirmed that the inclusion of precompiled binaries was an error in the release process; next upstream version won't have them and so the "make clean" hack can be dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 21:50:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186002] Review Request: python-archmod - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182150.k3ILoVt7004369@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-archmod - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186002 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-18 17:50 EST ------- I followed the packaging guidelines blindly... The packaging guidelines are in my opinion quite misleading on that subject. For perl it doesn't matter, as there is CPAN which is the reference for what is a module and what isn't for python there should be a word to help packagers choice. I have uploaded a srpm for archmage here: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/archmage-0.0.7-1.src.rpm Should archmage provides: python-archmod, or even conflicts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 21:51:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185288] Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182151.k3ILpm5O004731@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185288 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-18 17:51 EST ------- Fixed here (too lazy to bump release) http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/libchmxx-0.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:07:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182207.k3IM75DL008729@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 18:06 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc-1.1.13-4.src.rpm Lots of fixes to the spec file libdir is now /usr/lib irrespective of architecture built on -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:08:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182208.k3IM8do6009024@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 18:08 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/gtksourceview-sharp.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-4.src.rpm libdir now set to /usr/lib irrespective of hardware built on spec file fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:12:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182212.k3IMCujb009934@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 18:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo-0.7.5.2013-3.src.rpm libdir set to be /usr/lib irrespective of hardware built on spec file fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182214.k3IMEBFD010099@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-18 18:14 EST ------- * the %configure call I proposed above seems better than what is in the spec file, where redundant and unusefull options are set. * call %setup -q instead of %setup * libelektra.so must be in the devel package only. Similarly for other libraries that aren't dlopened. * Source: is wrong * Still the %changelog issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:14:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182214.k3IMEoUS010271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 18:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mono-debugger-0.12-2.src.rpm libdir set to /usr/lib irrespective of hardware built on spec file minor tweaks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:18:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182218.k3IMIhZb010886@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 18:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mod_mono.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mod_mono-1.1.14-2.src.rpm libdir now set to /usr/lib irrespective of what it's built on spec file mods -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:20:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] New: Review Request: xsp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 Summary: Review Request: xsp Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/xsp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/xsp-1.1.13-1.src.rpm Description: xsp is the mono ASP.NET page server ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 18:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/xsp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/xsp-1.1.13-2.src.rpm libdir now /usr/lib no matter what you build it on spec file alterations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:35:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] New: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: tkmame at retrogames.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pygame.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pygame-1.7.1-1.src.rpm ** NOTE ** You may have to download the src.rpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ Description: Pygame is a set of Python modules designed for writing games. It is written on top of the excellent SDL library. This allows you to create fully featured games and multimedia programs in the python language. Pygame is highly portable and runs on nearly every platform and operating system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:43:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182243.k3IMhPiD017444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-18 18:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > - The include file names are too generic to justfy installing them into > $(includedir) I do agree for kdb.h. Others may be acceptable. I believe the reviewer might make a choice here. > - Way too many warnings to provide sufficient trust to allow it to be installed > into /lib I don't think the issue is with trusted/untrusted. The issue is should this package be needed before /usr is mounted. Currently as nothing requires elektra during the boot process the whole elektra stuff could be in /usr. But it is a long term goal for elektra to be in such position, so maybe it could be kept in /lib? > - IMO, installing DLLs to /lib is a fundamental design flaw. I refuse to approve > any package doing so. Use ordinary, properly versioned shared libs, instead of > trying to introduce DLL hell to the Linux bootsystem. The use of dlopened libraries for elektra backends may make sense. There are other examples in fedora (pam, iptable, firefox plugins...). What seems more dubious is to drop those dlopened files in /lib. Especially since there exists a clean way to do that with libtool (as I described above). This issue is the same if things go to /usr/lib instead of /lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182252.k3IMqLtJ019291@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-18 18:52 EST ------- Is kdb really used during boot time? I think not. If not it should be in /usr/bin. kdb_static doesn't seems to be usefull to me. Regarding the libs in /lib or /usr/lib, I think that it would be acceptable to have dlopened libs in /lib/elektra/ and the main lib in /lib. However as long as the dlopend libraries are installed uncleanly I think that everything should go in /usr/lib. There are many warnings in the build logs when building with the fedora options, they should be looked at carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:58:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182258.k3IMwoJo020615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 Bug 189047 depends on bug 188505, which changed state. Bug 188505 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:58:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188505] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182258.k3IMwm6Y020596@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-18 18:58 EST ------- Package imported, branches created, builds requested, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:59:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182259.k3IMx2uV020661@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 Bug 189043 depends on bug 188505, which changed state. Bug 188505 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:59:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182259.k3IMx3xi020678@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 Bug 189042 depends on bug 188505, which changed state. Bug 188505 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:59:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188527] Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182259.k3IMx5f6020693@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188527 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Bug 188527 depends on bug 188505, which changed state. Bug 188505 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:59:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182259.k3IMxJas020740@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 188505, which changed state. Bug 188505 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:59:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188523] Review Request: perl-Params-Check In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182259.k3IMxVdu020779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Bug 188523 depends on bug 188505, which changed state. Bug 188505 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 22:59:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182259.k3IMxrNZ020893@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 Bug 189044 depends on bug 188505, which changed state. Bug 188505 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 23:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182339.k3INdYGl028403@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-18 19:39 EST ------- Doesn't build on x86_64, this appears to be a mono package that actually installs to %{_libdir}: Processing files: gecko-sharp-0.6-1 error: File not found: /var/tmp/gecko-sharp-0.6-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/gecko-sharp error: File not found: /var/tmp/gecko-sharp-0.6-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/mono/gecko-sharp error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/gecko-sharp-0.6-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/mono/gac/gecko-sharp/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 18 23:58:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604182358.k3INweW4031529@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 19:58 EST ------- The spec file needs altering Just add %define _libdir /usr/lib at the start and alter under %install that huge make install line to make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install and all should be fine Mono really can be a PITA over needing to be in /usr/lib I'll update the wiki to reflect this practise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 00:01:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190001.k3J01E9k031861@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-18 20:01 EST ------- MUST ==== * rmplint output: W: AllegroOgg-devel no-documentation docs are included in the base package; this warning can be ignored. * Package name acceptible (see earlier discussion) * Spec file name matches package name * Source matches upstream b4e99081acdb4bedb3206bdfb3b4d209 alogg.zip * BSD license ok, license file included * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Package builds in mock on multiple platforms: FC4-i386, FC4-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64 * BR ok with one exception (see below) * No Locales * ldconfig called for shared libs * Not relocatable * Doesn't create any directories that it needs to own * No duplicate %files * header files and .so (no suffix) live in -devel package * No .desktop file needed * No .la files included * -devel requires base package MUSTFIX ======= * libogg-devel is already required by libvorbis-devel The blocker is minor, so feel free to remove it after importing. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 00:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190013.k3J0DpQW001535@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 20:13 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono Should help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 00:22:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190022.k3J0MF3p002854@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-18 20:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=127957) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=127957&action=view) Patch file for the gecko-sharp spec file This should sort out a few problems. Hope it helps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 00:53:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190053.k3J0r6FE009081@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182463 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-18 20:53 EST ------- 0.6.0-1 approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 00:53:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190053.k3J0rthc009407@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-04-18 20:53 EST ------- Updated spec: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/gecko-sharp.spec Updated SRPM. http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/gecko-sharp-0.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 00:56:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190056.k3J0uEt3009886@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-18 20:56 EST ------- > Should I submit conexusgtkmm as a separate package for review? Better is. So this late package split gets another check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 00:56:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183953] Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190056.k3J0un1Y009986@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 01:11:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190111.k3J1B6pJ012385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From mrsam at courier-mta.com 2006-04-18 21:11 EST ------- Ok, I've repackaged and fixed things up. An updated package is at the same URL, http://www.courier-mta.com/bootconf-1.0-1.src.rpm Although it did not occur to me that this script is a big enough of a deal to merit its own web page, that's not a problem. The URLs in the updated spec file, and the revised tarball, are waiting for DNS to propagate, which should be done by tomorrow. In the meantime, here's the revised .src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 01:17:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183888] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190117.k3J1H0qO013525@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183888 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-18 21:16 EST ------- Builds cleanly and rpmlint is placated. Everything else looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 01:17:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183887] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190117.k3J1HdlS013672@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183887 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] New: Review Request: raptor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 Summary: Review Request: raptor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/raptor.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/raptor-1.4.8-2.src.rpm Description: Raptor is the RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland that provides a set of standalone RDF parsers, generating triples from RDF/XML or N-Triples. Ardour is dependent on this package. The spec file is based on a very old planet ccrma spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:11:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] New: Review Request: liblrdf Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 Summary: Review Request: liblrdf Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf-0.4.0-2.src.rpm Description: This is a library to make it easy to manipulate RDF files describing LADSPA plugins. Ardour is dependent on this package. The spec file is based on a old planet ccrma spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:14:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] New: Review Request: ardour Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 Summary: Review Request: ardour Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour-0.99.2-1.src.rpm Description: Ardour is a multichannel hard disk recorder (HDR) and digital audio workstation (DAW). It is capable of simultaneous recording 24 or more channels of 32 bit audio at 48kHz. Ardour is intended to function as a "professional" HDR system, replacing dedicated hardware solutions such as the Mackie HDR, the Tascam 2424 and more traditional tape systems like the Alesis ADAT series. It is also intended to provide the same or better functionality as software systems such as ProTools, Samplitude, Logic Audio, Nuendo and Cubase VST (we acknowledge these and all other names as trademarks of their respective owners). It supports MIDI Machine Control, and so can be controlled from any MMC controller, such as the Mackie Digital 8 Bus mixer and many other modern digital mixers. This is based on an old planet ccrma spec file. This package depends on jack-audio-connection-kit, liblrdf and raptor... all of which have been submitted to FE for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:16:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190216.k3J2GwcV031024@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183912, 189309, 189313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:17:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190217.k3J2H0x2031038@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189315 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:17:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190217.k3J2H3HC031069@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189315 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:17:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190217.k3J2HUP2031252@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189315 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:19:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190219.k3J2J0AH031673@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189309 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:19:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190219.k3J2JCct031724@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189313 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:42:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190242.k3J2g2OM006947@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 02:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190251.k3J2p65Q009487@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-18 22:50 EST ------- Builds now, but for some reason I cannot add anything to the database. Possibly the latest 0.2.7 release fixes it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 03:00:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190300.k3J305Fr011718@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-18 22:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > - Way too many warnings to provide sufficient trust to allow it to be installed > > into /lib > > I don't think the issue is with trusted/untrusted. I guess, I can't avoid to more direct: The amount of warnings qualifies this piece of SW as "not ready for public use". I would be willing to ignore them for an arbirary standard library, but I am not willing to ignore them for a package using DLLs, being involved into booting. > > - IMO, installing DLLs to /lib is a fundamental design flaw. I refuse to approve > > any package doing so. Use ordinary, properly versioned shared libs, instead of > > trying to introduce DLL hell to the Linux bootsystem. > > The use of dlopened libraries for elektra backends may make sense. > There are other examples in fedora (pam, iptable, firefox plugins...). Yes, these packages are also suffering from DLL hell. In particular, packaging firefox/mozilla plugins is a PITA because of this. But there still is a major difference between these packages and elektra: They install their DLLs into /lib/ rsp. /usr/lib//plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 03:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190317.k3J3HDCT015391@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-18 23:17 EST ------- Doesn't work on x86_64 by simply entering facter. /usr/bin/facter:9:in `require': no such file to load -- facter (LoadError) from /usr/bin/facter:9 which is the require 'factor' line. Works by specifying load path: ruby -I /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/ /usr/bin/facter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 04:15:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190415.k3J4Fnn4031086@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From tmayberr at redhat.com 2006-04-19 00:15 EST ------- Are you aware that by default ardour's build system will build and statically link to several libraries included in the release tarball which may already be packaged in FE. The packaging guidelines say something about this as I recall. There is a build flag to link dynamically with the system libraries, something like SYSLIBS=1. The URL in the spec file is also wrong, the ardour website was moved from sourceforge to ardour.org Thanks for submitting this, I hope I don't seem too critical of your effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 05:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] New: Review Request: rosegarden4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: seg at haxxed.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/rosegarden4.spec SRPM URL: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/rosegarden4-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: Rosegarden is an attractive, user-friendly MIDI and audio sequencer, notation editor, and general-purpose music composition and editing application for Unix and Linux. I've built and tested it on x86_64 and i386, and in mock. rpmlint complains about a bunch of null files, I dunno why rosegarden is installing a bunch of null image files but I guess its ignorable. It will probably complain about system timer resolution on startup. See http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/resources/faq/#toc31 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 06:01:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190601.k3J61soE024043@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net 2006-04-19 02:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.1-9.7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > * config files MUST not be under /usr; place them under /etc or /var > (see below) > > * horde requires write access to the config files (they are editable > through the web interface); so permissions should be 0660 for > root:apache or even apache ownership. These files should be located > under /var > > Perhaps location of the config files can be changed in the code, > perhaps you have to use symlinks for that Using symlinks, and rewriting horde's configuration a little, I have relocated horde's config files to /var/lib/horde, all 0660 apache:apache > > * the 'locale/*/horde.mo' files should be annotated with the corresponding > %lang() tags; it would be probably the best to move them to the > %regular /usr/share/locale and run '%find_lang horde' I've done the first part, labeled all the locales with the %lang() macro, but I'm not sure if %find_lang applied in this situation. All the horde locales are specified as ar_SY, bg_BG, en_US, etc... but most of the locales in /usr/share/locale is just the 2-letter ar, bg, en, etc. Is find_lang smart enough to overcome this, should I run some logic to figure it out myself, or should they be copied in as-is? > > * docs/ should be removed and packaged like > > | %doc docs/* Done > > * it might be a good idea to restrict the initial visibility of Horde > to localhost; e.g. by adding > > | > | Allow from 127.0.0.1 > | Deny from all > | > > to the apache configuration. Done > > What is with the authentication during the initial setup? Is there > a non-default password required for the 'Administrator' user? If > not, some modifications shall be done to avoid that an unconfigured > Horde installation can be run by unauthorized users. > There isn't any authentication during the inital setup, the browser is automatically logged in as Administrator. By default, Horde's "Authentication Mechanism" (configurable in 'Setup|Authentication') is set to "Automatically authenticate as a certain user", and the end user can then change that to HTTP, LDAP, whatever... For an added level of obscurity, I could make HTTP the default, and include an .htaccess file with a name and password, but it would be the same password for every installation and not really any more secure than the default no-password setup. Is this unacceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 06:04:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190604.k3J64SdA024682@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net 2006-04-19 02:04 EST ------- Matthias, can you take another look at this package and let me know what you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 06:56:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183374] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190656.k3J6ui9C006144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183374 Bug 183374 depends on bug 175198, which changed state. Bug 175198 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Pari https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175198 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 06:57:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183889] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190657.k3J6v7CJ006323@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183889 Bug 183889 depends on bug 175198, which changed state. Bug 175198 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Pari https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175198 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 06:57:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190657.k3J6vRrW006441@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-19 02:56 EST ------- For next release the spec file needs to be fixed to use cmake instead of autotools. I'll fix that up as soon as we have a release. One question: To get selinux working we need to do something like this: ----------pseucocode snip---------------- [if Fedora version >= 5] cmake . -DSELINUX:BOOL=ON [else] cmake . -DOLDSELINUX:BOOL=ON ----------------------------------------- ...instead of the current ./configure line (like I already did in the ifiles spec, except that we just have a "cmake ." there). What's the best way to achieve this? (Oh, and I got a son yesterday. This probably means I won't have much time for anything the coming week(s).) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 06:58:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183374] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190658.k3J6woJN006818@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183374 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-19 02:58 EST ------- Thanks for the review. 7836 (perl-Crypt-Random): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/7836-perl-Crypt-Random-1.25-1.fc6/ Branch requests for FC-4 and FC-5 made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 06:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183889] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190659.k3J6xDDY006890@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183889 Bug 183889 depends on bug 183374, which changed state. Bug 183374 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183374 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 07:00:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183889] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190700.k3J70dqg007189@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183889 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-19 03:00 EST ------- Thanks for the review. 7837 (perl-Crypt-Primes): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/7837-perl-Crypt-Primes-0.50-1.fc6/ Branchh requests for FC-4 and FC-5 made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 07:01:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183888] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190701.k3J712wx007320@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183888 Bug 183888 depends on bug 183889, which changed state. Bug 183889 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183889 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 07:21:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190721.k3J7LPnb013122@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-19 03:21 EST ------- 2 remarks: - The summary isn't quite correct: LibGLw provides Xt and Xm OpenGL widgets. It doesn't provide Xaw widgets. - Instead of building a standalone libGLw from Mesa's tarball, wouldn't it be easier to use SGI's original sources (I don't know if and where they still are available as a separate tarball) and to patch them to Mesa's state, or even to drop Mesa's libGLw in favor of SGI's? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 07:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190753.k3J7rJ3M024666@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-19 03:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Are you aware that by default ardour's build system will build and statically > link to several libraries included in the release tarball which may already be > packaged in FE. Thanks for all the pointers. I'll look into your comments. > Thanks for submitting this, I hope I don't seem too critical of your effort. Not at all. AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 09:19:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190919.k3J9JSMd019006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-04-19 05:19 EST ------- Briefly check of spec file gives following remarks: - why do you not use %find_lang macro? - ardor needs own the /etc/ardour/ (and may be use %{_sysconfdir} instead of / etc) - differnet style of build root definition (%buildroot vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}%{_other_macro} vs. %{buildroot}/%{_other_macro}) - buildrequires overhead (gcc-c++, flex and so on. See packaging guidelines) - more preferable to put full URL instead of name-version in Source: parameter - I don't know about noreplace feature in %config. Possible you need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 09:36:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190936.k3J9aGtR024605@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-19 05:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I guess, I can't avoid to more direct: The amount of warnings qualifies this > piece of SW as "not ready for public use". > > I would be willing to ignore them for an arbirary standard library, but I am not > willing to ignore them for a package using DLLs, being involved into booting. No software is forced to use elektra for booting. It will take years before stable elements of the booting process use elektra, if it ever happens. However for new elements in boot process I think it is not problematic if they use an experimental piece of software - even if only for testing. > Yes, these packages are also suffering from DLL hell. In particular, packaging > firefox/mozilla plugins is a PITA because of this. I am pretty unclear on the subject, but I can't see how this may be avoided. For non dlopended modules the library must be present during linking, and that's what is avoided with dlopened modules. Do you mean that dlopened modules should have a soname? But lt_dlopenext (and dlopen) don't care about sonames? The only way I see to achieve it would be to hardcode the version in the module name. So it seems to me that it would be misleading to have a version information in the file name similar with what is done for classical shared libraries when it is ignored. The versioning still may be achieved at runtime, by searching for some symbols that would be present only for a given version, or use values stored in variables to make sure that the backend version uses a given api version. From a quick glance at the backend code this doesn't seems to be implemented in elektra. But I do agree with you that it won't solve the trouble for the packagers to make sure that, at package install time the abi/api is the right one. What solution do you have, that allows the flexibility of dlopened modules while allowing to have a abi/api check at package? I see one, it is to have the backend link against a specific libelektra library version. But it is rather ugly. > But there still is a major difference between these packages and elektra: > They install their DLLs into /lib/ rsp. /usr/lib//plugins. That I agree completly with (as can be ssen in my other comments...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 09:39:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604190939.k3J9dmuZ025858@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com larsbj at gullik.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |larsbj at gullik.net ------- Additional Comments From larsbj at gullik.net 2006-04-19 05:39 EST ------- Is compiling a C++ lib that should be usable for application developent without exceptions really a good idea? (I'd say no) Saving some ~3MB sounds like a bad argument for doing this, as for speed... I'd like to see measurements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 10:18:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183888] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191018.k3JAIToq005003@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183888 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-19 06:18 EST ------- Thanks for the review. 7877 (perl-Crypt-RSA): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/7877-perl-Crypt-RSA-1.57-2.fc6/ FC-4 and FC-5 branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 10:18:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183887] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191018.k3JAIjPd005154@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183887 Bug 183887 depends on bug 183888, which changed state. Bug 183888 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183888 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 10:52:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191052.k3JAqNex015543@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From nomis80 at nomis80.org 2006-04-19 06:52 EST ------- It is possible to use exceptions with a Qt library compiled with -no-exceptions. KHTML uses exceptions and KDE's general policy is to assume Qt is compiled with exceptions disabled. Some googling revealed that the only theoretical problem would be when emitting exceptions from slots, or event handlers, or any function called by Qt's event loop, and not catching it and letting it propagate through Qt's stack, and then handling it in the main function. I did a small test, throwing an exception in such a place, and it propagates all the way up through Qt's stack without any problem. I can't see any problem with disabling exceptions in Qt. Any expert advice? I'll get around to posting the source code shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 10:55:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191055.k3JAtuXl016600@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From nomis80 at nomis80.org 2006-04-19 06:55 EST ------- Oh, and by the way you need to know that Qt itself doesn't use exceptions, so disabling exceptions doesn't disable any error handling in Qt itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 11:36:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191136.k3JBasWL027597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-19 07:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=127980) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=127980&action=view) some spec fixes Attached patch includes some fixes. | checking GRDDL parser requirements... no - libxml2 and libxslt | are both not available It's missing "BuildRequires: libxslt-devel". * BR curl libxml2 are redundant, because of BR curl-devel libxml2-devel * ASL2? While the old Apache Software License 1.1 maybe was called ASL by some people, better give the new "Apache Licence, Version 2.0" its full name, so "Licence: LGPL or Apache License Version 2.0" ( http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php ) * No reason not to use the %configure macro. * The following two are a major problem IMO: $ raptor-config --libs -L/usr/lib -lraptor -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lcurl -ldl -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lkrb5support -lcom_err -lresolv -lidn -lssl -lcrypto -lz -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz -lm -L/usr/lib -lxslt -lxml2 -lz -lm $ pkg-config --libs raptor -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lraptor -lcurl -ldl -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lkrb5support -lcom_err -lresolv -lidn -lssl -lcrypto -lxslt -lxml2 -lz -lm The results of both commands imply that you need much more than just "Requires: libxml2-devel" inside the raptor-devel package. Else linking against libraptor would fail, and developers/packagers would need to add the missing -devel package dependencies manually. Painful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 11:55:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191155.k3JBtHcg030884@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-04-19 07:55 EST ------- Re: exceptions. It's completely safe either way, according to comment in ./configure: ------------------------------ Recent versions of this compiler automatically include code for exceptions, which increase both the size of the Qt library and the amount of memory taken by your applications. You may choose to re-run `basename $0` with the -no-exceptions option to compile Qt without exceptions. This is completely binary compatible, and existing applications should continue to work. ------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 12:16:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191216.k3JCG0lR002286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-04-19 08:15 EST ------- OK, the patch applied upstream. Update to the latest SVN source. Note: this version works fine (at least for me :)) New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.spec New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind-20060418-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:38:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191438.k3JEc8rf006539@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2006-04-19 10:37 EST ------- Looks like compat-wxPythonGTK2 hasn't yet been built on devel or FC-5. Causes some problems like bug #188215. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:48:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188519] Review Request: perl-Module-Load In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191448.k3JEmV8Z010342@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188519 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-19 10:48 EST ------- Imported into CVS and packages built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:48:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191448.k3JEmNv3010306@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2006-04-19 10:47 EST ------- The specific code in bug #188215 (simply importing wxPython) should work fine with the new 2.6.x wxPython. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:48:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188527] Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191448.k3JEmgXw010393@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188527 Bug 188527 depends on bug 188519, which changed state. Bug 188519 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188519 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:48:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188521] Review Request: perl-Module-Loaded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191448.k3JEmsuq010502@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Loaded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188521 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-19 10:48 EST ------- Imported into CVS and packages built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188523] Review Request: perl-Params-Check In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEn3he010588@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-19 10:49 EST ------- Imported into CVS and packages built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnEHG010652@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 Bug 189043 depends on bug 188523, which changed state. Bug 188523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnGqC010675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 188519, which changed state. Bug 188519 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188519 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 189048 depends on bug 188523, which changed state. Bug 188523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnPiL010729@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 Bug 189042 depends on bug 188523, which changed state. Bug 188523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnbLd010838@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 Bug 189044 depends on bug 188519, which changed state. Bug 188519 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188519 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 189044 depends on bug 188523, which changed state. Bug 188523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188527] Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnjw1010914@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188527 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 188527 depends on bug 188523, which changed state. Bug 188523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-19 10:49 EST ------- Imported into CVS and packages built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnl4X010941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 Bug 189043 depends on bug 188527, which changed state. Bug 188527 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnwWT011042@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 Bug 189042 depends on bug 188527, which changed state. Bug 188527 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189039] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEntZM011006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189039 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-19 10:49 EST ------- Imported into CVS and packages built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:49:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191449.k3JEnwvm011044@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 Bug 189047 depends on bug 188523, which changed state. Bug 188523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191450.k3JEoAHN011170@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 Bug 189046 depends on bug 188523, which changed state. Bug 188523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188523 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:50:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191450.k3JEoMus011251@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 188527, which changed state. Bug 188527 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 14:50:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191450.k3JEoWid011301@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 188527, which changed state. Bug 188527 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Conditional https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:01:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186002] Review Request: archmage - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191501.k3JF1Wrq015134@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archmage - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186002 shahms at shahms.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: archmage - |archmod - Extensible |Extensible reader/decompiler |reader/decompiler of files |of files in CHM format |in CHM format | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-04-19 11:01 EST ------- Yes, the packaging guidelines are unclear on that. It's something that needs to be clarified. I'd leave out the provides. - rpmlint (still) gives no errors and there are no other regressions, the package looks good. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:03:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191503.k3JF3Njc015800@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwz at jwz.org ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-04-19 11:03 EST ------- Adding Jamie, so he can give his input on the packages if he wants to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:08:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191508.k3JF8fGu017334@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-04-19 11:08 EST ------- So my first thought is 5.0 isn't released yet, and Jamie has this on his website: "I encourage you to try it out and report any bugs that you find, but please don't distribute it." You may want to hold off on pushing it. On the other hand, this is rawhide we're talking about, so maybe it would be better to get it out sooner, so we get more testing. I would ask Jamie and see what he thinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:09:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191509.k3JF9Ns2017554@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rstrode at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:13:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183887] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191513.k3JFDKof018937@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183887 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-19 11:13 EST ------- Now that all of the prerequisites are built: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included in the package. * source files match upstream: * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:26:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191526.k3JFQmg6023833@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-19 11:26 EST ------- It seems I forgot the magic word. In case it wasn't obvious from the FE-ACCEPT thing, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:39:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191539.k3JFdbEp027912@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:42:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191542.k3JFgtOv029259@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-04-19 11:42 EST ------- Have you run rpmlint on the package? If so, would you mind attaching the output of it here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189373] New: Review Request: iperf -- measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189373 Summary: Review Request: iperf -- measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/iperf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/iperf-2.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Iperf is a tool to measure maximum TCP bandwidth, allowing the tuning of various parameters and UDP characteristics. Iperf reports bandwidth, delay jitter, datagram loss. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189374] New: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189374 Summary: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/jed/devel/jed.spec?root=extras Message-ID: <200604191553.k3JFrP4x031880@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-04-19 11:53 EST ------- I see this in the build log: checking for bc... no configure: WARNING: Your system doesn't have "bc", which has been a standard part of Unix since the 1970s. Come back when your vendor has grown a clue. We should investigate what the ramifications are, or just add a BuildReq on bc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 15:54:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] New: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/Maelstrom/devel/Maelstrom.spec?root=extras SRPM URL: check it out, run make SRPM Description: Maelstrom asteroids clone. So, when this was first imported into Extras, it got a free pass as it was moved from Core. I'd like, if possible, to get it reviewed to avoid future problems. Issues will most likely just be fixed directly in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:14:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183887] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191614.k3JGEeV4004192@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183887 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-19 12:14 EST ------- Thanks once again for the review. 7884 (perl-Net-SSH-Perl): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/7884-perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.30-1.fc6/ FC-4 and FC-5 branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:18:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188261] Review Request: perl-Finance-Quote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191618.k3JGIDw4004975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-Quote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188261 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-04-19 12:18 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:18:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188293] Review Request: perl-HTML-TableExtract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191618.k3JGId7A005148@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TableExtract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188293 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-04-19 12:18 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:18:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188293] Review Request: perl-HTML-TableExtract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191618.k3JGIW8h005087@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TableExtract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188293 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-04-19 12:18 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:18:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188261] Review Request: perl-Finance-Quote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191618.k3JGIieZ005186@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-Quote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188261 Bug 188261 depends on bug 188293, which changed state. Bug 188293 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TableExtract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188293 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:19:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191619.k3JGJci2005313@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-19 12:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=127992) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=127992&action=view) rpmlint log First, rpmlint log for rpms compiled under development environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:29:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191629.k3JGTB1C007395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-19 12:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > checking for bc... no > > configure: WARNING: Your system doesn't have "bc", which has been a standard > part of Unix since the 1970s. Come back when your vendor > has grown a clue. > I removed the necessity of bc by adding Patch268: xscreensaver-5.00a9-remove-bc.patch (this should work with bash configure) ..... bc is only used in configure and I can't understand the necessity of bc any more because the usage of bc in configure can be substituded with expr in coreutils. Without this patch, configure stops at this line if not having bc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:30:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191630.k3JGU5ov007680@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191633.k3JGXfMn009092@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-19 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #233) > Even though perhaps not ready for extras, it is very usable. This is an FE review request. The purpose of such requests is review packages for integration into FE. As it seems to me, you guys are abusing FE-devel as your testbed and are mixing up bugzilla with a developers mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:35:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166253] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-GladeXML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191635.k3JGZ4xh009775@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-GladeXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166253 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:35:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191635.k3JGZSWV009898@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:35:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177235] Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191635.k3JGZlic010058@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177235 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:36:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191636.k3JGaAkh010215@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:36:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177507] Review Request: pida In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191636.k3JGajiu010380@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:36:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179237] Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191636.k3JGaxNA010528@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179237 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:37:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191637.k3JGbV67010843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:37:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191637.k3JGbtqD011074@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:38:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191638.k3JGcINg011234@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:38:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191638.k3JGcrdA011491@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:39:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191639.k3JGd0mb011540@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:39:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191639.k3JGdD92011644@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:39:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191639.k3JGdkuQ011820@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:40:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191640.k3JGeJZW011977@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:40:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177401] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191640.k3JGehPE012098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177401 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191640.k3JGewuW012212@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:41:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191641.k3JGfMUo012422@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191641.k3JGfjXJ012561@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:42:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191642.k3JGgIlb012836@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:42:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176071] Review Request: silgraphite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191642.k3JGgfLL013037@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silgraphite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176071 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:43:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191643.k3JGhFun013513@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:43:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191643.k3JGhnM2013720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:44:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191644.k3JGiCjC013865@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] New: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-ruledispatch.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-ruledispatch-0.5a0-0.svnr2115.src.rpm Description: Something about generic functions in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:45:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191645.k3JGjIs5014113@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191645.k3JGjVHP014172@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:46:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169717] Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191646.k3JGk3nv014315@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169717 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:46:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191646.k3JGkG0k014424@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:46:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191646.k3JGkc05014530@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:46:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177110] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - symbol checker for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191646.k3JGkptr014571@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - symbol checker for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177110 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166470] Review Request: taskjuggler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191647.k3JGl4oZ014651@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskjuggler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166470 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:47:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191647.k3JGlQg4014803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:47:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191647.k3JGlhCb014985@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:48:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191648.k3JGmGJg015286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-19 12:48 EST ------- A question.... Now I add some patches which add some enhanced function for my TASTE or INTEREST such as....... - re-blank of re-lock window when restarting - cycle screen hack when locked and middle button of mouse is pressed - show hack number on xscreensaver-demo - add the selection option of quad mode - add a option to show hacks on gnome 2 background and add some fixes which I think is proper: - kill hack when window size is too small (cause floating point exception) - kill hack on xscreensaver-demo window before blanking screen by pushing a button on xscreensaver-demo (otherwise, it sometimes leaves zombie process... of which the reason I don't know) I don't know whether Jamie accepts these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:48:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191648.k3JGmGuV015285@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:48:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191648.k3JGmf9l015446@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:49:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191649.k3JGn42x015597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sprog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191649.k3JGnb8g015722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:50:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191650.k3JGo1CD015831@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:50:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191650.k3JGoNt5015943@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191651.k3JGp6ow016154@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191651.k3JGpT2a016270@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:51:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191651.k3JGppLo016384@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:52:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171289] Review Request: dirmngr: Client for Managing/Downloading CRLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191652.k3JGq3K6016457@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dirmngr: Client for Managing/Downloading CRLs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171289 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:52:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191652.k3JGqehe016654@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-19 12:52 EST ------- Umm... I didn't the button "ASSIGNED"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191652.k3JGqkd4016745@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:53:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191653.k3JGrV3d017247@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:54:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177414] Review Request: geda - project manager for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191654.k3JGsRlT017520@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - project manager for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177414 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:54:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177619] Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191654.k3JGsoRt017631@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177619 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:55:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191655.k3JGtNQf017768@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:55:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191655.k3JGt8rh017720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-19 12:54 EST ------- A few things stand out in the spec file: * Source0: should be the full url to the source archive * BuildRoot is not the recommended value for FE * It might be useful to add %{?dist} on the release tag * Summary should not end in '.' or begin with 'A' The Games SIG also recommends the following: * Static game data should be in %{_datadir}, not /usr/games/%{name} * high score file should be put directly into /var/games, or in /var/games/Maelstrom if there are multiple variable data files for the game. I didn't look at the setgid parts of the source code yet, but that will also need to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:55:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191655.k3JGtPsu017799@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:55:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174898] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191655.k3JGtmbn017852@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174898 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:56:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177109] Review Request: geda-symbols - symbol repository for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191656.k3JGuABb017910@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - symbol repository for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177109 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191656.k3JGuWap018036@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:56:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177107] Review Request: libgeda - library for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191656.k3JGut0E018195@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - library for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177107 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:57:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177818] Review Request: adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191657.k3JGv7cJ018231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:57:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191657.k3JGvepL018360@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:58:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178003] Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191658.k3JGwDv3018558@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178003 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:59:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191659.k3JGxAuk018880@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:59:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191659.k3JGxXoh019004@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 16:59:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177603] Review Request: libpri In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191659.k3JGxuXm019066@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpri https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177603 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191700.k3JH0eIW019176@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191701.k3JH1DdE019282@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173522] Review Request: milter-regex milter filter regular expression based In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191701.k3JH1ZY7019378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milter-regex milter filter regular expression based https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173522 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:02:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191702.k3JH29wI019519@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:02:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166919] Review Request: findlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191702.k3JH2Vtu019643@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: findlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166919 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:02:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191702.k3JH2sRR019765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:03:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191703.k3JH3Xi0020070@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-19 13:03 EST ------- The .desktop file is also not installed using desktop-file-install. This will also require a new BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils. The icon cache isn't updated in %post and %postun like so: %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:03:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173790] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191703.k3JH3b3G020121@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173790 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:04:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178932] Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191704.k3JH4Ant020268@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178932 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:04:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171040] Review Request: postgis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191704.k3JH4Oj3020367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171040 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:04:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166251] Review Request: perl-Apache-LogRegex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191704.k3JH4atm020458@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-LogRegex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166251 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:04:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177416] Review Request: geda-examples - some examples for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191704.k3JH4xSx020520@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - some examples for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177416 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:05:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191705.k3JH5CtG020568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191705.k3JH5jbf020652@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:06:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167983] Review Request: evolution-caldav In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191706.k3JH6TUB020785@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-caldav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167983 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:06:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191706.k3JH6p6m020901@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:07:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177108] Review Request: geda-gschem - schematic editor for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191707.k3JH7FrI021001@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - schematic editor for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177108 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:07:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167364] Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191707.k3JH7ShU021072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167364 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:07:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191707.k3JH7oLO021185@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191708.k3JH83DB021295@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:08:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191708.k3JH8Qpv021427@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:08:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177113] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - netlist generator for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191708.k3JH8mkj021593@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - netlist generator for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177113 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178360] Review Request: xmms-adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191709.k3JH9LEj021722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178360 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:10:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173722] Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191710.k3JHAE8R021863@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173722 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:10:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177249] Review Request: jrtplib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191710.k3JHARj7021924@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jrtplib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177249 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177860] Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191712.k3JHCTmM022482@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177860 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:10:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176580] Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191710.k3JHAp4F022049@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:13:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191713.k3JHD68t022681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:13:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191713.k3JHDjQ9023021@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:14:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169169] Review Request: JACAL: an interactive symbolic mathematics program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191714.k3JHECYi023223@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: JACAL: an interactive symbolic mathematics program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169169 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191714.k3JHEJNQ023260@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:14:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191714.k3JHEXG6023326@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:15:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177082] Review Request: wm-icons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191715.k3JHF0L9023497@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wm-icons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177082 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173724] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191715.k3JHFWDl023574@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173724 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:15:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175502] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191715.k3JHFt49023667@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175502 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:16:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177828] Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191716.k3JHGH52023766@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177828 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:16:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176109] Review Request: pytraffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191716.k3JHGU4n023830@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytraffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176109 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177415] Review Request: geda-docs - documentation for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191717.k3JHHDYr024101@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-docs - documentation for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177415 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:17:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177865] Review Request: adplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191717.k3JHHaGT024196@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177865 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:18:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177115] Review Request: geda-utils - utilities for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191718.k3JHI0D1024335@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - utilities for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177115 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:18:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177080] Review Request: metisse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191718.k3JHIhKu024573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177080 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:19:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191719.k3JHJBV2024777@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:19:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191719.k3JHJZ8i024894@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:20:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177413] Review Request: geda-gattrib - attribute editor for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191720.k3JHK82t025023@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - attribute editor for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177413 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:21:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191721.k3JHLgpO025321@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:21 EST ------- Please build with mISDN. Also include app_conference if you don't already, because we really don't want to require zaptel. The mISDN and Zaptel Asterisk modules should probably go into separate sub-packages, which can require the corresponding kernel modules. Including chan_bluetooth would also be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:27:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191727.k3JHRO6e026840@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Briefly check of spec file gives following remarks: > - why do you not use %find_lang macro? How do I use this? There are .mo files with different names (gtk_ardour.mo, libardour.mo, etc). > - ardor needs own the /etc/ardour/ (and may be use %{_sysconfdir} instead of / > etc) Done. > - differnet style of build root definition (%buildroot vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and > %{buildroot}%{_other_macro} vs. %{buildroot}/%{_other_macro}) Fixed. > - buildrequires overhead (gcc-c++, flex and so on. See packaging guidelines) Removed gcc-c++. I believe flex is required. > - more preferable to put full URL instead of name-version in Source: parameter Fixed. > - I don't know about noreplace feature in %config. Possible you need it. Added. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176071] Review Request: silgraphite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191732.k3JHWK8u028473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silgraphite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-19 13:32 EST ------- updated. This is almost official release from upstream. The tarball is not generated with make dist, it is generated with ViewVC from http://scripts.sil.org/svn-view/graphite/graphite/tags/v2.1.tar.gz -=- New src.rpm: http://mpeters.us/silgraphite/silgraphite-2.1-1.src.rpm New spec file: http://mpeters.us/silgraphite/silgraphite.spec The alphatag stuff is gone because this is not a CVS checkout but is a upstream sanctioned release. If it is brought into Extras, the dist tag will be added again to differentiate from (and replace) the upstream rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191733.k3JHXjJY028997@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-19 13:33 EST ------- Corrected version: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog-1.2.19-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:36:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173790] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191736.k3JHawoV030200@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173790 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-19 13:36 EST ------- Withdrawn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:37:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191737.k3JHb4a1030248@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=127980) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=127980&action=view) [edit] > some spec fixes Thanks Micheal. I'll try to post new bits tomorrow with your changes and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:38:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191738.k3JHcZU2030803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:38 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, Since you are going to maintain the package, you're free, of course, to add changes that match your taste and interests. In general, you should try to get as many patches as you can that are suitable for upstream, upstream, though. It reduces the pain of maintaining the package and it means a wider audience of people benefit from your changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191741.k3JHfrZJ031917@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:41 EST ------- Thanks for the rpmlint output in attachment 127992. Can you fix the problems with E: by them? Also, can you look at the ones with W: by them and see if fixing them makes sense? If you have any questions feel free to ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191744.k3JHinmW000409@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:44 EST ------- Package is in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:45:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188668] Review Request: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191745.k3JHjRDG000641@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188668 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:45:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188677] Review Request: gnome-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191745.k3JHjq0C000776@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188677 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:45 EST ------- fixed in the package thats now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188014] Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191748.k3JHmntf001551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188014 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-04-19 13:48 EST ------- Any problems with creating the account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 17:52:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169210] Review Request: xnee: recorder and player of X actions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191752.k3JHqxDv002619@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnee: recorder and player of X actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169210 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From RichieS at GMail.com 2006-04-19 13:52 EST ------- Is anyone going to work on this? or is it abandoned? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 18:37:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] New: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://dxr3.sourceforge.net/ http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/em8300-0.15.3-3.src.rpm http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/em8300-kmod-0.15.3-2.2.6.16_1.2080_FC5.src.rpm These packages provide drivers and utilities for Sigma Designs Hollywood Plus/ Creative DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder cards. The cards require a microcode (firmware) blob which is not included due to redistribution issues but can be extracted from vendor provided Windows drivers using the tools in the em8300-devel package, or downloaded from the upstream project site at http://dxr3.sourceforge.net/download/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 18:41:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172803] Review Request: openssl097f - compat package to help transitioning to new openssl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191841.k3JIfAr3017075@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openssl097f - compat package to help transitioning to new openssl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172803 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From hpa at zytor.com 2006-04-19 14:40 EST ------- Please put openssl097f into FE if not into FC. Not having forward binary compatibility from FC4 to FC5 is a major headache. See bug 188098. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 18:53:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189402] New: Review Request: bogofilter - Fast anti-spam filtering by Bayesian statistical analysis Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189402 Summary: Review Request: bogofilter - Fast anti-spam filtering by Bayesian statistical analysis Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: adrian at lisas.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/bogofilter.spec SRPM URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/bogofilter-1.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Bogofilter is a Bayesian spam filter. In its normal mode of operation, it takes an email message or other text on standard input, does a statistical check against lists of "good" and "bad" words, and returns a status code indicating whether or not the message is spam. Bogofilter is designed with fast algorithms (including Berkeley DB system), coded directly in C, and tuned for speed, so it can be used for production by sites that process a lot of mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 18:56:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191856.k3JIumVk022775@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-19 14:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128002) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128002&action=view) rpmlint log for xscreensaver-4.99.2.3-4 Built: xscreensaver-4.99.2.3-4 bc warning is erased. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 19:16:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191916.k3JJGCf3030017@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: torque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-19 15:16 EST ------- The builds just went through so I guess we're done here. Thanks Ed for the help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 19:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191917.k3JJHFAc030602@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: torque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 garrick at usc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 19:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191917.k3JJHnGW030819@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 Bug 177841 depends on bug 188105, which changed state. Bug 188105 Summary: Review Request: torque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 19:52:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191952.k3JJqjAr009814@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-04-19 15:52 EST ------- I just tried it on an x86_64 box (albeit under RHEL4, haven't found a x86_64 FC5 one yet) and it seems to work. The directory /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/ should be on the ruby load path $:, assuming you installed the x86_64 version of ruby. If you only have the i386 version, things will be slightly more icky - does that need to be supported (using a x86_64 facter package with a i386 ruby ?) To investigate this further, could you give me the following: * The version of ruby and FC you are running * The output of "ruby -e 'puts $:'" * The output of "ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"]'" * The output of "rpm -qlp facter-1.1.4-4.x86_64.rpm" (the one you installed on the machine) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 19:53:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191953.k3JJrErA010000@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-04-19 15:53 EST ------- Updated to new upstream package: Spec URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion.spec SRPM URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion-1.16-0.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 19:57:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604191957.k3JJvLHF011404@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 joel.schaerer at insa-lyon.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joel.schaerer at insa-lyon.fr ------- Additional Comments From joel.schaerer at insa-lyon.fr 2006-04-19 15:56 EST ------- When will the new packages be available? The code i would like to use is mainly incompatible with wx2.6, so the packages are going to be needed! As of today, i only see the old package: wxPythonGTK2.i386 2.4.2.4-7 extras in extras, and it doesn't work (cf bug #188215) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 20:42:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189416] New: Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189416 Summary: Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-nose.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-nose-0.8.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: nose: a discovery-based unittest extension. nose provides an alternate test discovery and running process for unittest, one that is intended to mimic the behavior of py.test as much as is reasonably possible without resorting to too much magic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 20:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189416] Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604192043.k3JKhJKM027859@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189416 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 21:24:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186002] Review Request: archmage - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604192124.k3JLOqFZ022674@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archmage - Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186002 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-19 17:24 EST ------- Built for devel, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 21:40:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604192140.k3JLep4d001551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-04-19 17:40 EST ------- New packages should now be available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 22:07:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188666] Review Request: gucharmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604192207.k3JM7IUb008240@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gucharmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188666 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 22:29:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604192229.k3JMTkLh013461@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From jwz at jwz.org 2006-04-19 18:29 EST ------- Come on, guys. What part of "please do not distribute this" was unclear? There will be a real release in a month or two. Please do not distribute my alpha and beta releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 22:43:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604192243.k3JMhLr3017296@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From lyz27 at yahoo.com 2006-04-19 18:43 EST ------- Can you give me the bug number on the glibc-kernheaders issue? I would like to check the status and help out if I can. I tried the packages that are in the development branch and they produced the same error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 19 23:06:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604192306.k3JN6NTj022209@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-19 19:06 EST ------- 189324 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 00:32:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 154392] HelixPlayer should be removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200032.k3K0WvsC006246@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HelixPlayer should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154392 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 00:33:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200033.k3K0XIEP006391@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 01:12:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200112.k3K1Csjf013546@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2006-04-19 21:12 EST ------- Shouldn't package reviews be closed as NEXTRELEASE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 01:20:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200120.k3K1KH8Z014981@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-04-19 21:20 EST ------- Ehh. Semantics. I think of NEXTRELEASE as "FC-6" as opposed to "Immediately in repo", but I could see either being valid. They're built. That's what really matters, right? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 02:26:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180743] Review Request: pdsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200226.k3K2QF2k028101@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180743 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 02:26:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180747] Review Request: powerman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200226.k3K2QMa4028127@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powerman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180747 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 02:39:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187625] Review Request: ices IceS is a source client for a streaming server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200239.k3K2d0Ge032189@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ices IceS is a source client for a streaming server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187625 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-19 22:38 EST ------- The HTML and CSS files have been moved, but the XML files are now MIA. Also, the XML files should probably be marked %config(noreplace) and relocated to %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 02:41:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200241.k3K2fXOG000634@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2006-04-19 22:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Ehh. Semantics. > > I think of NEXTRELEASE as "FC-6" as opposed to "Immediately in repo", but I > could see either being valid. Sure, just wondering whether the process had changed. I was going off of step 14 of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/NewPackageProcess > They're built. That's what really matters, right? :) Indeed, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 02:44:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200244.k3K2iCRr001476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-19 22:44 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 03:01:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189451] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189451 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: garrick at usc.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses.spec SRPM URL: http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses-1.13-1.src.rpm Description: Perl bindings for ncurses, bringing terminal-independant character handling capabilities to Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 03:01:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] New: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: garrick at usc.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses.spec SRPM URL: http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses-1.13-1.src.rpm Description: Perl bindings for ncurses, bringing terminal-independant character handling capabilities to Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 03:03:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189451] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200303.k3K33SUY006634@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189451 garrick at usc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|package name here> ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-19 23:03 EST ------- Nevermind! My bad! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 03:04:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189451] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200304.k3K34B3x006764@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189451 garrick at usc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 03:49:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181803] Review Request: scrub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200349.k3K3n60P019022@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181803 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 04:16:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200416.k3K4G6i6024356@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From jwz at jwz.org 2006-04-20 00:15 EST ------- > I can't understand the necessity of bc any more because the usage > of bc in configure can be substituded with expr in coreutils. xscreensaver (and its configure script) run on systems that do not have bash or (I believe) expr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 04:19:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200419.k3K4J3qx024828@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-20 00:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Here is the new srpm: > http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/hugs98-2005.03-1.fc5.src.rpm Thanks. I think buildrequires libXt-devel covers libICE-devel and libSM-devel, and also freeglut-devel pulls in mesa-libGL-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel, and libX11-devel requires xorg-x11-proto-devel anyway. libX11-devel seems sufficient for HsXlib and AFAICT libXt is only checked for in configure but not actually included by any of the library sources. Also better to keep openal-devel around for when HOpenal gets updated (ghc-6.4.2 includes a newer version apparently). And it builds on fc4 anyway. > * I moved the demos into /usr/share/doc. I also remove the > Makefile which doesn't make sense in this context. Good. > * I split off the packages x11, opengl, glut and hgl. I hope > I got the dependencies right. I used lowercase names, because > I find it aesthetically more pleasing :-) Great. :) > * I make the demos package depend on hugs98-glut and hugs98-hgl, > since there are demos that use them. I wouldn't want to > further split the demos package. Ok. Btw what is "touch src/stamp-h.in" needed for? Also seems to me "make install" is good enough, do the docs really need to be installed separately? Otherwise it looks very good to me, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 04:22:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200422.k3K4M84c025473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-20 00:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128022) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128022&action=view) hugs98.spec-2005.03-1.fc5.patch some more recommended changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 05:31:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200531.k3K5VN82006061@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-20 01:31 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2.7.1-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2.7.1-3.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 20 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.7.1-3 - Add chan_bluetooth * Wed Apr 19 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.7.1-2 - Split off more stuff into subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 05:44:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200544.k3K5i4mn009137@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-20 01:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Please build with mISDN. That looks like it will take packaging up some other libs. I'll look into what it takes to get those packaged up. > Also include app_conference if you don't already, > because we really don't want to require zaptel. Just adding app_conference and moving some modules to a subpackage won't completely eliminate dependencies on Zaptel. There are some parts of the Asterisk core that use Zaptel timing channels (it's *supposed* to work without Zaptel being present but I haven't verified that). > The mISDN and Zaptel Asterisk modules should probably go into separate > sub-packages, which can require the corresponding kernel modules. The latest package moves some modules that depend on Zaptel to a subpackage. mISDN support will definitely be a subpackage if/when I get to it. > Including chan_bluetooth would also be good. See latest packages. I used the version I found on cvs.infradead.org to generate the patch. Let me know if there's a different version that I should have used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 06:29:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189451] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200629.k3K6TbuO017067@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189451 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 07:08:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 03:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200708.k3K78m3q024445@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-20 03:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #230) > Given that upstream seems to be wanting fall into the cmake trap, What trap is that? I thought that cmake being in FE meant that other packages in FE could use it? > and given the fact this PR has seen 229 comments, I am inclined to think this > package is not ready for inclusion into FE. (almost) all those comments are constructive and helpful, they're here because people want this package in extras and are willing to help. I'm guilty of having written almost 100 of them. Blame me. > I am hereby proposing to close this Request as FAILED until this package has > matured. It is maturing all the time. Have you really looked at the difference between when I opened this bug and where we stand now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 07:25:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 03:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200725.k3K7Pd26028441@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-20 03:25 EST ------- > What trap is that? I already answered that yesterday on fedora-extras@ > It is maturing all the time. Have you really looked at the difference between > when I opened this bug and where we stand now? Yes, initially you stood in the middle of nowhere, now you are still standing midst of active development and way off from being ready for a release. This is my last comment on this RR, I'll leave the final decision to this RR to others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 08:49:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604200849.k3K8nAH4022493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-04-20 04:49 EST ------- First I generate multiple RPMs for various distro from a single spec template + m4 macros. then I used rpmlint to check for potential issues before submiting and solved nearly all of them. * The tags at the begining not needed, but result from that generation process, and I don't think it's a big issue in itself. * %__id_u is not available for all distro, so I replaced it with id -u -n * Group modified * The path used in the scriptlet is just a check to avoid simultaneous installation of the tool from the tar ball and the rpm which leaded to issuse in the past. So it has to echo something, if not iy's useless. I can't adapt the path, as this path is precisely unrelated to the ones used in the package. * I modified thr Source: tag to include full path * I removed the cleanup in %prep * There is no build phase in itself, as mindi is based on script, and configuration files, as well as a small chroot content. So I don't see your point because I don't build in the install phase. I really just install wit the install.sh script. * I added /etc/mindi as a %config in %files * The problem of the duplicate files is due to te fact that the defattr is 644, but I need that some files be 755. Doing it in install (I went there) does not solve that issue, as rpm behind rechange the modes, if you don't put them with attr later on. Any solution to that issue ? * Changelog added (forgot it) New version available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-1.0.7-495.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 10:32:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 06:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188014] Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201032.k3KAWd5f016350@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188014 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 11:17:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179852] FC4 buildsys fails - FC4 mock succeeds - wine-docs package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201117.k3KBHdhD026225@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC4 buildsys fails - FC4 mock succeeds - wine-docs package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179852 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|/dev/std* missing in mock - |FC4 buildsys fails - FC4 |FE buildsystem |mock succeeds - wine-docs | |package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 11:25:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201125.k3KBPekl027913@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-20 07:25 EST ------- It's missing the --makefile-uninstall rule in %postun -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 13:06:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] New: Review Request: pcb Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 Summary: Review Request: pcb Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pjones/packages/pcb.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pjones/packages/pcb-0.20060414-1.src.rpm Description: PCB is an interactive printed circuit board editor for the X window system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:15:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201415.k3KEFoTb003544@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-20 10:15 EST ------- None of the core packages uninstalls schemas... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:16:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180743] Review Request: pdsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201416.k3KEGv96003837@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180743 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-20 10:16 EST ------- Please close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:17:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201417.k3KEHl0i004077@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-20 10:17 EST ------- Please close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:19:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201419.k3KEJ7nO004429@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-20 10:18 EST ------- Doesn't mean we shouldn't. I let it go in w/out the removal, but you should add it to CVS and next time the package gets bumped it will have the code there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201428.k3KESdQw007474@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-04-20 10:28 EST ------- This bug is closed; and I'm not going to accept a "permanently under review" position, just because I pushed the package through the initial review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:45:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201445.k3KEjWPg014168@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-20 10:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Please build with mISDN. After taking a look at mISDN I think that I'm going to have to let someone else package the mISDN libs/drivers. Once the mISDN libs have been packaged I'll enable the mISDN channel in Asterisk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:55:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201455.k3KEtYut016912@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-20 10:55 EST ------- Good: + Local buid works + Mock build works fine Bad: - Source0 should contain a full-qualified URL - Perl should be not included as Buildrequires. - The package should contain the text of the license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 14:57:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201457.k3KEv2Wu017375@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:20:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201520.k3KFKJXk025725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkmame at retrogames.com ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-04-20 11:20 EST ------- Hi, This compiles if you just comment out line 21. I've also made some patches to get it to compile in 64-bit mode. I am interested in packaging this (and possibly metisse). I'm sure I could come up with a new spec file in a day or so that might pass the mustard if you don't mind me taking it over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:22:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201522.k3KFMcu2026826@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-20 11:22 EST ------- Good: + Local build worked fine. Bad: - source0 doesn't contains a fulled qualified URL. - BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - No menu entry for GUIs exists - Mock build fails with: checking for cygwish83... no checking for cygwish80... no configure: error: Did not find the wish executible. You need to make sure that tcl is installed on your system and that wish is in your path error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14070 (%build) I asume, that tcl should be a BuildRequires. - rpmlint on source rpm complaints: W: pcb summary-ended-with-dot An interactive printed circuit board editor. W: pcb strange-permission pcb.spec 0600 - rpmlint on binary rpm complaints: W: pcb summary-ended-with-dot An interactive printed circuit board editor. E: pcb info-files-without-install-info-postin /usr/share/info/pcb.info.gz E: pcb info-files-without-install-info-postun /usr/share/info/pcb.info.gz E: pcb non-executable-script /usr/share/pcb/tools/PCB2HPGL 0644 W: pcb devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcb/tools/gerbertotk.c E: pcb info-files-without-install-info-postin /usr/share/info/pcb.info-2.gz E: pcb info-files-without-install-info-postun /usr/share/info/pcb.info-2.gz E: pcb standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 E: pcb non-executable-script /usr/share/pcb/tools/Merge_dimPCBPS 0644 E: pcb non-executable-script /usr/share/pcb/tools/tgo2pcb.tcl 0644 E: pcb info-files-without-install-info-postin /usr/share/info/pcb.info-1.gz E: pcb info-files-without-install-info-postun /usr/share/info/pcb.info-1.gz E: pcb non-executable-script /usr/share/pcb/tools/MergePCBPS 0644 - Package doesn't contains a verbatin written copy of the license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:24:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177080] Review Request: metisse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201524.k3KFOcRt027491@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177080 tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkmame at retrogames.com ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-04-20 11:24 EST ------- I might be interested in taking this package over. I need atleast the client (xwnc part). I have a spec file already for xwnc, although ideally we would want metisse and possibly metisse-xwnc. But this might be difficult to package and I may need some help. I do have a xwnc only package that I need to get in soon though for a game I am packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:26:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201526.k3KFQ9lT027954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-20 11:25 EST ------- Needswork: * the license should be "GPL or Artistic". Check the README file. * add the following doc files "Copying Artistic README" (the license files were already mentioned) * add the demo scripts as doc Others improvements: * use the following url instead http://search.cpan.org/dist/Curses/ as it's much more useful -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:33:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201533.k3KFXLMT030269@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-20 11:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128043) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128043&action=view) Rewritten spec for lat 1.0.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:35:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177080] Review Request: metisse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201535.k3KFZANV030902@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177080 tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:36:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201536.k3KFaGbJ031382@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177080 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:36:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201536.k3KFaptI031671@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-20 11:36 EST ------- The attached spec file in Comment #4 addresses all of the issues raised so far, plus a shedload of others. However, since the initial submitter has not yet responded to any comment in this bug, I wonder if he's still interested in maintaining this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:39:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201539.k3KFdLmq032701@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-20 11:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I think buildrequires libXt-devel covers libICE-devel and libSM-devel, > and also freeglut-devel pulls in mesa-libGL-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel, > and libX11-devel requires xorg-x11-proto-devel anyway. libX11-devel seems > sufficient for HsXlib and AFAICT libXt is only checked for in configure > but not actually included by any of the library sources. I would like to leave it as it is. Better too many requirements than not enough. Maybe there is a bug somewhere but building in mock without requiring xorg-x11-proto-devel did not succeed. Also, the build may seem to succeed, and the packages installed, but the binary modules may not be there! I had quite a fun time to figure out the requirements. > Also better to keep openal-devel around for when HOpenal gets updated > (ghc-6.4.2 includes a newer version apparently). And it builds on fc4 > anyway. The problem is, as it seems, that the openal package is then included but the binary module is not. I will include a commented out buildreq. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 15:43:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201543.k3KFhNcC001682@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2006-04-20 11:43 EST ------- Re comment #4: I'd be very happy if someone else volunteered to maintain it; I only occasionally use this tool, and haven't touched the package in a while, I'm afraid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 16:31:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201631.k3KGVm8V013723@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-20 12:31 EST ------- Now, I built: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xscreensaver-4.24-4.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xscreensaver.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xscreensaver-4.99.2.3-7.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xscreensaver5.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/core/updates/testing/5/SRPMS/xscreensaver-4.24-2.1.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/core/updates/testing/5/SPECS/xscreensaver.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 16:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201635.k3KGZWC1014839@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 17:17:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201717.k3KHHJvB025972@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-20 13:17 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback, I think I have everything fixed up. I wasn't entirely sure how demo scripts should be included in %doc because that triggers rpmlint. I corrected #!/usr/local/bin/perl and removed execute bits. http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses.spec http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses-1.13-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 17:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201738.k3KHcEOS031377@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-20 13:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Btw what is "touch src/stamp-h.in" needed for? It appears that this is necessary so that configure creates all the necessary files. Without it, the prefix is set to "/usr/local" for example. > Also seems to me > "make install" is good enough, do the docs really need to be installed > separately? This installs the documentation into /usr/lib/hugs. Of course one could let it do this and delete afterwards. I have made some little changes, same file, same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 17:44:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201744.k3KHiaZ5000862@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-20 13:44 EST ------- as far as i know misdn requires a kernel patch aswell. not sure if its buildable without patching the kernel. personally i have only messed with visdn (and packaged it in an ugly way for myself). visdn has been certified in italy and doesent require a kernel patch. afaik it only works with euroisdn yet though. not sure if misdn is certifiable at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 18:29:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189416] Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201829.k3KIT8f5013392@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189416 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 18:30:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187809] Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201830.k3KIUhxx014045@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187809 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-20 14:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > BuildRequires: perl is not allowed. Has been changed. Personally I like to include the perl BR (in the past it has been required; a lot of perl specfiles include it). > Why %{perl_vendorarch}/GSSAPI* instead of just %{perl_vendorarch}/GSSAPI ? Because I want to include the module file GSSAPI.pm and the directory GSSAPI. > > Review: > ... > * source files match upstream: > 91d5029a32302aa02414c9c8e3353cec IO-Interface-0.98.tar.gz > 91d5029a32302aa02414c9c8e3353cec IO-Interface-0.98.tar.gz-srpm Wrong digests - this is GSSAPI not IO-Interface. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 18:43:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201843.k3KIhZ2e019006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-20 14:43 EST ------- >From my point of you, you may put the demo scripts into %doc and ignore the rpmlint messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 18:54:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201854.k3KIs6Ob022571@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-04-20 14:54 EST ------- 1) Overthinking. CVS tarball isn't really needed, so I've reverted to a released tarball (2.20.1). New packages: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla-2.20.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 18:57:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189416] Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201857.k3KIvuqO024177@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189416 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-20 14:57 EST ------- PUBLISH +1 MD5Sums: 400cf55994cfec7772292319f7cd195d nose-0.8.7.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed * Builds fine in Mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. Suggestion: * Couldn't the *.pyo files be %ghosted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 19:00:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201900.k3KJ0AsD024994@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-04-20 15:00 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, Okay, as per comment 13, let's go with 4.24 for the initial import to extras and you can switch to 5.0 when it is released in a couple of months. Does the 4.24-4 rpmlint output look okay? Thanks for doing the FC-5 update as well. I'll see what I can do about getting your changes pushed out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 19:51:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604201951.k3KJpmSl006665@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-20 15:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128062) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128062&action=view) rpmlint log for xscreensaver-4.24-4.2 To remove one rpmlint complaint, I repackaged xscreensaver ver4 rpm to 4.24-4.2 . (srpm and spec file are located as above) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 20:02:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202002.k3KK266j008778@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-20 16:01 EST ------- Be nice, be friendly, fix your package, and lead by example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 20:08:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188661] Review Request: gcalctool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202008.k3KK8T66010464@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcalctool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188661 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-20 16:08 EST ------- This has already been fixed in cvs. Any further issues should be a new bug, not more comments on a closed bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 20:11:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169717] Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202011.k3KKBB5Q011067@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169717 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-20 16:11 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 20:23:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202023.k3KKNQB1013815@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-04-20 16:23 EST ------- In response to comment #15: I sponsored you on 2006-03-19, pinged you on 2006-03-31 via email when you said hopefully you would import over the weekend. Do you expect to have time soon? If you are too busy perhaps it would be better to drop my sponsorship and let someone else with more time step forward for this package? In response to comment #16: Yeah, some policy on elisp files would be nice. I don't like 'emacs-muse-xemacs' as a package name, thats just plain confusing. In the absense of policy, I think it's fine for this to be emacs-muse and xemacs-muse. Several other packages use that scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 20:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202041.k3KKfgJb019096@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-20 16:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128067) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128067&action=view) x86_64 build warnings I get a number of potentially problematic build warnings on x86_64 like this: src/mixer.c:84: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size These occur in the following files: src/mixer.c src/surface.c src/time.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 20:50:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202050.k3KKoFO4021212@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-04-20 16:50 EST ------- Having difficulty getting to the srpm and the spec at the provided urls. sf is giving me 404 errors. Is this submission request and the associated 186327 submission request dead? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 21:30:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202130.k3KLUhcd030565@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-04-20 17:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pygame.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pygame-1.7.1-2.src.rpm ** NOTE ** You may have to download the src.rpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ %changelog * Thu Apr 20 2006 Christopher Stone 1.7.1-2 - Added a patch to clean up some warnings on 64 bit compiles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 22:02:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180149] Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202202.k3KM2fku006454@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180149 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Christian.Iseli at licr.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-04-20 18:02 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint is ok - name ok - spec name ok - packaging guidelines met - license ok - license matches actual license in package - license file in %doc - spec file in American English and legible - source matches upstream - builds, installs, runs, and uninstalls cleanly - BuildRequires ok - no locale to worry about - shared libs ok - -devel package ok - no relocation to worry about - no duplicated files - files perms ok - clean section ok - macro useage ok - package contains code - no large doc - %doc is only doc - builds in mock My machines here still run FC4, so I didn't check if the code actualy runs... but I'll trust you on this one. Why the empty %doc in the devel package ? I think %{_datadir}/%{name}/ is more explicit than %{_datadir}/%{name} but that's a matter of taste I guess... rpmlint says: E: edje non-executable-script /usr/share/edje/data/template/build_theme.sh 0644 E: edje non-executable-script /usr/share/edje/data/e_logo.sh 0644 W: edje-devel no-documentation which I think can be ignored. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 22:03:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180058] Review Request: ecore: An event and X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202203.k3KM37gk006566@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore: An event and X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180058 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 22:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180052] Review Request: evas: A hardware-accelerated canvas API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202203.k3KM3Ws3006786@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas: A hardware-accelerated canvas API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180052 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 22:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180102] Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202204.k3KM4IDg006941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180102 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 22:42:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202242.k3KMgE3b014083@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 23:21:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202321.k3KNLfQI020615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 pjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From pjones at redhat.com 2006-04-20 19:21 EST ------- Ok, all of these things are fixed, and a new src.rpm and spec are uploaded. Additionally, rpmlint runs clean on both src an binary rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 23:23:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202323.k3KNNgs3020914@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From pjones at redhat.com 2006-04-20 19:23 EST ------- Oh, actually, there's still no menu entry. Are there docs on that someplace? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 23:37:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202337.k3KNbF00024002@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-20 19:37 EST ------- Here's some info on the desktop file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28desktop-file-install%29#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 23:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202340.k3KNe66r024720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-20 19:40 EST ------- It's actually not 0 for no runlevel, but -. So the line in the init script should be "- 20 80" Note the -. It does build on x86_64 though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 23:44:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202344.k3KNi2n1025286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-04-20 19:43 EST ------- Please do not import packages into CVS before they are marked FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 23:50:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202350.k3KNob5t026695@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-20 19:50 EST ------- rpmlint output clean. MUST ==== * Package and spec file named appropriately * Source matches upstream 05d86d1af446f79411359400951053b7 pygame-1.7.1release.tar.gz * LGPL license ok. License file included * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Compiles and builds in mock on: FC-4 i386, FC-4 x86_64, FC-5 i386, FC-5 x86_64 * No offensive BR: * No locales * No .so's needed in the linker's path * Not relocatable * Owns directories that it creates * No duplicate %files * %{buildroot} cleaned in %clean and at start of %install * Macro usage consistent * headers placed in -devel package * -devel requires base * No .la files * No .desktop file needed MUSTFIX ======= * python-abi isn't needed on FC-4 and later: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Please remove the Requires: on python-abi after importing. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 20 23:51:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604202351.k3KNp9fE026835@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-20 19:50 EST ------- Looks like you've got some unnecessary BuildRequires. Duplicate BuildRequires: m4 (by bison), glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel), pkgconfig (by glib2-devel), libjpeg-devel (by gd-devel), freetype-devel (by gd-devel), zlib-devel (by gd-devel), libpng-devel (by gd-devel), netpbm-progs (by tetex-latex) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 00:06:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210006.k3L063Xc029372@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From pjones at redhat.com 2006-04-20 20:05 EST ------- OK, desktop file added, and also fixed the extra buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 01:06:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189553] New: Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189553 Summary: Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/BUGS/bugs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/BUGS/bugs-1.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: "BUGS - the Bug Genie" is an open source enterprise level issue tracking system, built on open source technology. "BUGS" enhances your development process, by offering an advanced tool to manage bug reports, feature requests and user feedback for your products. "BUGS" requires a webserver (we recommend Apache) with PHP installed (PHP 5 not supported), and MySQL. I have this working on Fedora Core 5 and RawHide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 03:06:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210306.k3L36Sg1032423@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-20 23:06 EST ------- Ok, dns for your webserver seems to be down at the moment, but please go ahead and import to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 03:22:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183067] Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210322.k3L3MIon004163@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183067 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com hondaman at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hondaman at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From hondaman at gmail.com 2006-04-20 23:22 EST ------- [root at hondaserver ~]# rpmbuild --rebuild par2-0.4-1.src.rpm Installing par2-0.4-1.src.rpm warning: user dragoon does not exist - using root warning: group dragoon does not exist - using root warning: user dragoon does not exist - using root warning: group dragoon does not exist - using root warning: user dragoon does not exist - using root warning: group dragoon does not exist - using root warning: user dragoon does not exist - using root warning: group dragoon does not exist - using root warning: user dragoon does not exist - using root warning: group dragoon does not exist - using root error: Failed build dependencies: libsigc++20-devel is needed by par2-0.4-1.x86_64 I have installed libsigc++20-devel and it still wont build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 03:54:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210354.k3L3sXf4013245@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-04-20 23:54 EST ------- No, they are not dead. We had space problems at our sf.net group account so they had to be removed. I will put up new versions of both packages today or next monday on a different server. Unfortunatly i did not have had ANY free time before, sorry for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 04:52:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188440] Review Request: dispatcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210452.k3L4qDAB025618@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dispatcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188440 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-21 00:52 EST ------- * Remove the entire Requires line, rpm can figure it out from BuildRequires * Keep lines to 80 characters or less (%description) * Do not include /usr/share/doc, it is part of the standard hierarchy, the %doc macro does that * Do not include static archives if they are not needed. If they are used to compile against split them off into a devel sub package. See the packaging guideslines on the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 05:15:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210515.k3L5Fwv0029054@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-21 01:15 EST ------- Build failed. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnutls collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [gtklp] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 06:18:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210618.k3L6IoCF007378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-21 02:18 EST ------- Obsoletes: python-pygame < 1.7.1 Provides: python-pygame = %{version}-%{release} The above would be appreciated in order to achieve clean upgrades from the same (orphaned) package in livna.org. The two '='s in the -devel dependency look suspicious: Requires: %{name} == %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 06:32:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210632.k3L6W7HH009817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-21 02:31 EST ------- Is 1.13-2 acceptable in its current form, or should I not remove the execute bits? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 08:36:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210836.k3L8a73h009481@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-21 04:35 EST ------- Added buildreq gnutls-devel. Now builds fine. Package at: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gtklp-1.2.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 08:39:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210839.k3L8d35b010387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-04-21 04:38 EST ------- Ok I'm going to fix the init script. Then what's next step? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 09:13:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604210913.k3L9DXG9021065@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 11:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211150.k3LBovXJ029353@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-21 07:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Briefly check of spec file gives following remarks: Updated spec file and SRPM here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour-0.99.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 12:03:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211203.k3LC3w6t032287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From tmayberr at redhat.com 2006-04-21 08:03 EST ------- >From your latest spec file * Fri Mar 17 2006 Andy Shevchenko - no libs subpackage - From Fernando Lopez-Lezcano : - added configuration variable to build with/without capabilities Why? Has Fedora ever shipped a kernel with the required capabilites enabled for this to be of any use? Planet CCRMA did so at one stage but that was a fair while ago. - create temporary directory as /var/lib/jack/tmp Why? What is wrong with the default /dev/shm directory? I'm also wondering if all the backends are needed, can you think of a good reason not to disable the port audio and oss backends? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 12:09:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211209.k3LC96tJ000691@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-21 08:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Are you aware that by default ardour's build system will build and statically > link to several libraries included in the release tarball which may already be > packaged in FE. The packaging guidelines say something about this as I recall. I looked into this a little. The ardour sources are bundled with versions of libsigc++, libgtkmm, and other libraries not currently packaged for FC/E. The packaging guidelines say that packages should only link against system libraries, not private versions of their own libraries. However, I think we should make an exception in this case. Here are my reasons: - The versions of these libraries are very different from the versions packaged in Fedora (by major version numbers). - The libraries have been modified by the ardour authors. - The ardour authors only support the use of these statically linked modified libraries. - The ardour authors support these libraries within ardour as if it were their own application code. Updating ardour to use the system libraries would be a major development effort and would not have the support of the upstream project. I think the fact that these are statically linked into the app (making it impossible for another app to use my mistake) is also a mitigating factor here. Please make an exception in this case. Forcing ardour to use system versions of these libraries would be counter-productive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 12:16:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211216.k3LCGHJl001920@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-21 08:16 EST ------- Regarding Comment #5, I think this is a reasonable request. The nmap package in Core similarly includes modified private versions of system libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 15:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189603] New: Review Request: libgalago Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189603 Summary: Review Request: libgalago Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/galago/libgalago.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/galago/libgalago-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: Galago presence library I'll be posting the rest of the galago packages in the next day or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 15:53:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189609] New: Review Request: galago-daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189609 Summary: Review Request: galago-daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/galago/galago-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/galago/galago-daemon-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: The Galago presence daemon, which is the center of all presence transactions for Galago. This service is automatically launched by D-BUS when needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 15:54:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189609] Review Request: galago-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211554.k3LFshn4001052@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galago-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189609 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 15:54:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189603] Review Request: libgalago In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211554.k3LFst5R001097@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189603 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189609 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 16:07:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] New: Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 Summary: Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/milter-regex/milter-regex.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/milter-regex/milter-regex-1.6-4.src.rpm Description: Milter-regex is a milter based filter that makes it possible to filter emails using regular expressions. This is a resubmission of Bug #173522 since the original submitter no longer seems to be interested in maintaining this package. I've been using it for around six months and am very happy with its functionality and stability. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 16:09:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173522] Review Request: milter-regex milter filter regular expression based In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211609.k3LG9mYA005968@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milter-regex milter filter regular expression based https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173522 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-21 12:09 EST ------- Since the original submitter no longer seems to be interested in this package, I've resubmitted it myself and will close this one as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 189611 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 16:09:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211609.k3LG9xrg005990@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vramirez at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-21 12:09 EST ------- *** Bug 173522 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 16:45:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211645.k3LGjcNF017224@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-21 12:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Is 1.13-2 acceptable in its current form, or should I not remove the execute bits? You could leave the exec bits on. The extra dependencies you get as a result of this are: * /usr/bin/perl * perl(Curses) * perl(ExtUtils::testlib) perl(Curses) is provided by the package itself, and the other two are provided by the main perl package, which is already a dependency of this package. So there aren't any new dependencies introduced by leaving the exec bits on. It might also be worth adding a comment in the spec file that the worrying-looking output from the build script...: Making a guess for "c-config.h"... WARNING: Your Curses form.h file appears to be in the default system search path, which will not work for us because of the conflicting Perl form.h file. This means your 'make' will probably fail unless you fix this, as described in the INSTALL file. ... can be ignored because /usr/include/form.h is a symlink to /usr/include/ncurses/form.h, which the Makefile.PL finds and uses quite happily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 16:49:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211649.k3LGntZe018772@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |aalib ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-04-21 12:49 EST ------- 1. Perhaps, this feature is over. Could you tell me your solution? 2. No wrong. I've read native README and catch up this feature from it. Can I use /dev/shm directly instead of %jack_tmpdir? 3. By default the portaudio and oss plugins are built. OSS may be disabled in many cases except non-ALSA cards (How many of such cases? I don't know). Portaudio may be excluded from BR and we get flexibility of packaging rule (portaudio library still present at FE repo). More better reason I can't think out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 16:51:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211651.k3LGpPgP019194@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-04-21 12:51 EST ------- Update. http://www.poolshark.org/src/gideon-R8-0.1.BETA.src.rpm http://www.poolshark.org/src/gideon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 16:56:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211656.k3LGubT3020699@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-04-21 12:56 EST ------- > How do I use this? There are .mo files with different names (gtk_ardour.mo, libardour.mo, etc). This is example: %install ... %find_lang gtk_ardour %find_lang libardour for i in gtk_ lib; do cat ${i}ardour >> ardour.lang done ... %files -f ardour.lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 17:14:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211714.k3LHEXo0024455@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-21 13:14 EST ------- I've now listed up-imapproxy on the OrphanedPackages page on the wiki. Some of the warning messages produced during the build of this package are rather worrying. For example: src/request.c: In function 'HandleRequest': src/request.c:1832: warning: too few arguments for format src/request.c: In function 'cmd_authenticate_login': src/request.c:659: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer src/request.c:715: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer I'd like to see these cleaned up before doing a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 17:42:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211742.k3LHgr5J030460@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 drees76 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ultimateevil.org ------- Additional Comments From drees76 at gmail.com 2006-04-21 13:42 EST ------- I'll work on these issues this weekend unless the original maintainer jeff at ultimateevil.org (who I've added to the CC list) steps back up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 17:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211758.k3LHwLk8001420@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-04-21 13:58 EST ------- Fixed as release 3. Perhaps someone on livna could make a pygame-nonfree rpm or something? I did not know this rpm even existed! :o) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 18:02:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187809] Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211802.k3LI2Zaq002490@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187809 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-21 14:02 EST ------- > Has been changed. Personally I like to include the perl BR (in the past it has > been required; a lot of perl specfiles include it). The steering committee has changed the requirement, so include it if you wish. > Wrong digests - this is GSSAPI not IO-Interface. Don't know how I messed that up; I must have cut from the wrong window. The actual checksums are: 2779227c30afa412415680da54b98a10 GSSAPI-0.21.tar.gz 2779227c30afa412415680da54b98a10 GSSAPI-0.21.tar.gz-srpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 18:03:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187797] Review Request: perl-IO-Interface - Perl extension for accessing network card configuration information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211803.k3LI3Gk8002869@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Interface - Perl extension for accessing network card configuration information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187797 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-21 14:03 EST ------- The steering committee has changed the rule and allowed BR: perl, so I drop my objection. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 18:03:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211803.k3LI3R6T002914@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-21 14:03 EST ------- What was in the livna package that made it non-free? Perhaps it had a dependency on smpeg, mp3, or something like that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 18:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211811.k3LIBgMe005462@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-04-21 14:11 EST ------- The full package requires smpeg-devel to create a movie.so file. I think that is the only extra file that is missing. The -devel package I build includes an ffmovie.h file, but I think this is okay to include. Let me know otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 18:24:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211824.k3LIOwfv009627@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-21 14:24 EST ------- Thanks, Builds fine on the buildsystem. Shall I close? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 18:37:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185221] Review Request: wifiroamd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211837.k3LIbQed014254@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wifiroamd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185221 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-04-21 14:37 EST ------- Just for reference, I've talked to the submitter (who is also the upstream developer) and have agreed to maintain this package in Extras. It built cleanly on FC-4,5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 18:46:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211846.k3LIkjIV017953@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-21 14:46 EST ------- >From what I can tell, the ffmovie.{c|h} files are only wrappers that call into the ffmpeg library to do the actual decoding work. I don't believe this is a problem, especially since movie.so doesn't get build, resulting in no dependency on mpeg libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 19:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187799] Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604211907.k3LJ7hxV023551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187799 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-21 15:07 EST ------- It's too bad about the test suite; maybe in the future we can figure out why it won't work. Issues: rpmlint complains: W: perl-Cairo devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Cairo/Install/cairo-perl.h W: perl-Cairo devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Cairo/Install/cairo-perl-auto.h I can't imagine it being worth it to split these to a -devel package, but the packaging guidelines insist that they not be in the main package. This seems to be a perl thing, as other modules (DBI, Gtk-Perl, PDL, etc.) include header files that aren't in devel packages. So I'm inclined to approve, but I'll ask for clarification. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included in the package. * source files match upstream: 6ad0ab39eb8f56272373a9ea4515f37a Cairo-0.03.tar.gz 6ad0ab39eb8f56272373a9ea4515f37a Cairo-0.03.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. X rpmlint complains about header files. * final provides and requires are sane. * a shared library is present, but it is internal to perl so ldconfig is not needed. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is disabled. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. X headers are present and not in -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 20:19:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212019.k3LKJmK3006203@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-21 16:19 EST ------- Put the exec bits back and added a note about the warning. http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses.spec http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-Curses-1.13-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:02:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212102.k3LL2Vbf016755@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-21 17:02 EST ------- ffmovie.h is not too useful in this -devel package though because it contains "#include ". By the way, -devel is missing these (see #include's in installed headers): Requires: python-devel Requires: SDL_ttf-devel Requires: SDL_mixer-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:03:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212103.k3LL3ZYE016902@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|aalib |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187830] xchat-gnome crashes when notifications plug-in is enabled. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212110.k3LLAUDr018480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xchat-gnome crashes when notifications plug-in is enabled. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187830 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2006-04-21 17:10 EST ------- I checked out your CVS version (prospective 0.11-1.fc5 I suppose), and this problem is gone, in that the DBUS plugin apparently can't be deactivated now. At least, if I try, I get an error dialog saying there was a problem unloading the plugin. Are you planning on releasing the new package, or are you waiting for a fix for that dialog? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:30:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189634] New: Installation is not as clean as prior editions. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189634 Summary: Installation is not as clean as prior editions. Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: my.ihatespam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description of problem: INstallation options do not "stick" in text based mode. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): FC 5 How reproducible: Very. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Download FC5 from mirrors. Check SHA, burn to CD, check CD with FC5 cd media check. 2.unselect everything- every package. Install webserver (all options), MySQL (all but devl), text based net tools, and that is it. 3. Upon install- X.org is installed, nmap, etc. Actual results: Installation is not as clean as prior editions. No help (concerning what the package is - yes sometimes even I forget with the thousands of packages). Packages that are not intended to be installed are installed. Expected results: The packages that were selected should be installed, packages that were not selected should not be installed, and dep check should give a chance to go back and deselect. Additional info: Installed on: Dell Latitude CSx, 128M ram, 11G HD, 10/100 PCMCIA nic I have been using RH/FC since 1999. ------- Additional Comments From my.ihatespam at gmail.com 2006-04-21 17:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128104) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128104&action=view) instal log, anaconda-ks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:37:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187830] xchat-gnome crashes when notifications plug-in is enabled. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212137.k3LLbiu3024537@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xchat-gnome crashes when notifications plug-in is enabled. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187830 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-21 17:37 EST ------- xchat-gnome-0.11-1.fc5 was already pushed out on 06-Apr-2006. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:39:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189041] Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212139.k3LLdfBQ025061@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 17:39 EST ------- Imported, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212139.k3LLdsDK025109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 Bug 189043 depends on bug 189041, which changed state. Bug 189041 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:40:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212140.k3LLe5hA025163@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 Bug 189042 depends on bug 189041, which changed state. Bug 189041 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:40:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212140.k3LLeVMC025290@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 189041, which changed state. Bug 189041 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189041 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:44:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189042] Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212144.k3LLigEl026069@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 17:44 EST ------- Imported, branches created, builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:44:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212144.k3LLitN8026116@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 189042, which changed state. Bug 189042 Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Extract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189042 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:49:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186566] Review Request: bsdiff - binary diff/patch utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212149.k3LLn6Se026779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsdiff - binary diff/patch utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186566 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-04-21 17:49 EST ------- I saw you imported it at last... don't forget to add it to owners.list and close this bugzilla entry once the packages are built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:56:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189043] Review Request: perl-File-Fetch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212156.k3LLuXgo027806@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 17:56 EST ------- Imported, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 21:56:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212156.k3LLumTx027901@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 189043, which changed state. Bug 189043 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189043 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 22:01:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189040] Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212201.k3LM1Pvf028752@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189040 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 18:01 EST ------- Imported (-2), branches created, and builds requested. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 22:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212202.k3LM28jb029104@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 189040, which changed state. Bug 189040 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Accessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189040 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 22:29:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187797] Review Request: perl-IO-Interface - Perl extension for accessing network card configuration information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212229.k3LMTfrL001590@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Interface - Perl extension for accessing network card configuration information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187797 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-21 18:29 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 22:29:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187809] Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212229.k3LMTf6B001601@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187809 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-21 18:29 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 22:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212257.k3LMvPXY007537@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 18:57 EST ------- I've opened a ticket for the warning: http://rt.cpan.org//Ticket/Display.html?id=18845 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 22:59:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212259.k3LMxsLe008067@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 18:59 EST ------- There's already a ticket open for the warnings: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18220 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 23:02:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212302.k3LN2whp008576@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-04-21 19:02 EST ------- Fixed in release 4. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 23:29:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212329.k3LNTDPn012101@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-21 19:29 EST ------- http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-0.8.7-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 23:31:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212331.k3LNVDjR012578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-21 19:31 EST ------- http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-gl-0.4.1-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 23:31:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212331.k3LNVhOU012726@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-21 19:31 EST ------- http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-gtk-0.4.1-6.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 23:36:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212336.k3LNaYbp013853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 19:36 EST ------- I think we're ready to go on this, when you have time... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 21 23:41:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604212341.k3LNf6K0014757@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-21 19:41 EST ------- Done. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Info-0.30-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 01:01:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180747] Review Request: powerman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220101.k3M11ABt025680@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powerman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180747 ------- Additional Comments From woodard at redhat.com 2006-04-21 21:01 EST ------- Finally had some time to work on this. I fixed the problem with the mock build and uploaded a new set of packages. With regards to the other problems. I believe you must have been looking at an older version of the spec file. There are no errors or warnings coming from rpmlint: [ben at flix result]$ pwd /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result [ben at flix result]$ rpmlint powerman-* [ben at flix result]$ Defattr is set to (-,root,root): [ben at flix result]$ grep defattr /tmp/powerman.spec %defattr(-,root,root) - changed defattr which was interfering with perms of included files. [ben at flix result]$ There are no places where we have hard coded /etc and we are using _sysconfdir: [ben at flix result]$ grep etc /tmp/powerman.spec - change perms on files in etc/powerman so that they don't look like scripts - changed etc to sysconfdir macro. - Changed /etc/rc.d/init.d/ to initrddir [ben at flix result]$ grep sysconf /tmp/powerman.spec chmod 644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/powerman/* %dir %{_sysconfdir}/powerman %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/powerman/* - changed etc to sysconfdir macro. [ben at flix result]$ Will you please reevaluate the CURRENT version of powerman's SRPM. http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/powerman/powerman.spec http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/powerman/powerman-1.0.23-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 01:04:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189634] Installation is not as clean as prior editions. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220104.k3M14W2R026221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Installation is not as clean as prior editions. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189634 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |anaconda AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |anaconda-maint- | |list at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |mikem at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 01:39:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220139.k3M1dIWF031085@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-21 21:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I would like to leave it as it is. Better too many requirements than > not enough. Maybe there is a bug somewhere but building in mock > without requiring xorg-x11-proto-devel did not succeed. > Also, the build may seem to succeed, and the packages installed, but > the binary modules may not be there! I had quite a fun time to > figure out the requirements. Hmm ok, it seemed to build fine for me in mock without them, though I?didn't do an careful rpmdiff comparison... I guess some the early modular X packages had some missing -devel deps, but I think that is all sorted out now. Otherwise please report the problem in bugzilla. > > Also better to keep openal-devel around for when HOpenal gets updated > > (ghc-6.4.2 includes a newer version apparently). And it builds on fc4 > > anyway. > The problem is, as it seems, that the openal package is then included > but the binary module is not. I will include a commented out > buildreq. Ah, good point. I suppose one could patch to the latest version released with ghc-6.4.2. Anyway it may be an idea to subpackage openal too for FC4 say: so perhaps a %_with_openal switch would be useful. (In reply to comment #9) > > Btw what is "touch src/stamp-h.in" needed for? > It appears that this is necessary so that configure creates > all the necessary files. Without it, the prefix is set to > "/usr/local" for example. Oh, sounds like a bug then. In my Fedora Haskell package I didn't do that, but hadn't noticed any problems, I wasn't using %configure - dunno if that is related. > I have made some little changes, same file, same place. Thanks for your submission and all your work on this. The package is ACCEPTED. Please build it for FE4 too. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 01:46:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220146.k3M1kAjA032064@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-04-21 21:45 EST ------- Fernando seems to think using /dev/shm is a good idea: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-March/msg00994.html Remove all the jack_tmpdir stuff and just use /dev/shm Also, capabilities is a kernel 2.4 thing. You should just remove jackstart and all the capabilities related stuff. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-March/msg00984.html It appears the needed realtime and memlock permissions can be provided by pam, but I can't find any good documentation on what exactly you should set. (/etc/security/limits.conf) A README.Fedora will probably be in order for this... I've submitted Rosegarden for review, which uses jack for audio support. I'll do a full review of jack when I find some time. (But I can't sponsor) Should we start an Audio SIG? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 02:05:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220205.k3M25aax001543@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-04-21 22:05 EST ------- * Updated to latest upstream release 0.16.0 Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/puppet.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/puppet-0.16.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 02:05:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187809] Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220205.k3M25mbT001563@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187809 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-21 22:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Has been changed. Personally I like to include the perl BR (in the past it has > been required; a lot of perl specfiles include it). Hmm, a BR: perl is rather meaningless, but also doesn't hurt. If wanting to be pedantic, FE perl packages actually would BR: %{__perl} because they typically also Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) Note: This calls %{__perl} and will fail if __perl and the 'perl' program provided by the perl-rpm should ever diverge. Though this is rather unlikely to occur, it would hit should ever perl change its executable's name (/usr/bin/perl7, /usr/bin/perl5), or should the executable's directory ever change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 02:23:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220223.k3M2Ns4Q003783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From csilvers2000 at yahoo.com 2006-04-21 22:23 EST ------- OK, we've finally figured out all the wrinkles. google-perftools 0.7 was just released on sourceforge, and I've confirmed it compiles and passes 'make check' on my fc3 system, at least. Have at it! http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=133355 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 02:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220240.k3M2e6MP007332@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-21 22:39 EST ------- Funny, I was in the middle of the review when you commented.... Issues: The Requires: filter is: @@PERL_REQ@@ "$@" | sed -e '/^perl(Your::Module::Here)$/d' I'm not sure what you wanted to filter there. rpmlint is unhappy: E: perl-CPANPLUS useless-explicit-provides perl(CPANPLUS::Config) W: perl-CPANPLUS hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/CPANPLUS/inc/.inc E: perl-CPANPLUS zero-length /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/CPANPLUS/inc/.inc I don't quite understand the first error; there is no such explicit Provide: in the .spec so RPM must be generating it. I'm not sure wiere the .inc file is coming from or what it's supposed to do. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: c9e9831d24d69b1f690d8b4967436899 CPANPLUS-0.061.tar.gz c9e9831d24d69b1f690d8b4967436899 CPANPLUS-0.061.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. X rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is present but necessarily disabled. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 05:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220507.k3M57lnH029940@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-04-22 01:07 EST ------- Ah, found it. Add something like this to /etc/security/limits.conf : username - memlock 32768 username - rtprio 99 Then log out and log back in. Jack can indeed set itself RT with these settings on FC5. Dunno what memlock really needs to be. The mailing list posts I dug up set it to 4gb, which seems kind of dangerous to me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 05:11:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] New: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: qspencer at ieee.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/mftrace.spec SRPM URL: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/mftrace-1.1.19-1.src.rpm Description: mftrace is a small Python program that lets you trace a TeX bitmap font into a PFA or PFB font (A PostScript Type1 Scalable Font) or TTF (TrueType) font. This is a build dependency of GNU Lilypond, the automated music typesetting system that I am also submitting for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 05:15:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] New: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: qspencer at ieee.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec SRPM URL: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.1-1.src.rpm Description: LilyPond is an automated music engraving system. It formats music beautifully and automatically, and has a friendly syntax for its input files. Note: All of the build dependencies are in Fedora Core or Extras, except for mftrace, which I have also submitted for review (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655), so I recommend that a prospective reviewer review both of these packages together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 05:17:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220517.k3M5H8Cp031006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 qspencer at ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189655 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 05:17:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220517.k3M5HJPa031072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 qspencer at ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189656 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 05:26:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220526.k3M5QVQw031784@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-04-22 01:26 EST ------- Okay I poked at the system timer problem a bit. Putting this in modprobe.conf is supposed to get snd-rtctimer loaded automatically: options snd-seq seq_default_timer_device=1 alias snd-timer-1 snd-rtctimer But I can't seem to convince rosegarden to use it. Setting it in the preferences doesn't seem to do anything. And if you go back to the preferences, reverts back to auto. In fact, no matter what I set it to, it seems to not take effect and it stays stuck on auto. Bleh. I haven't been able to google up anyone else with this problem, everyone seems to just compile their kernels with a 1000hz timer instead... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 05:42:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220542.k3M5glht002053@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-04-22 01:42 EST ------- Forgot to comment on the drivers. I see no reason why you'd want to use portaudio, when there's native ALSA support. And OSS needs to die already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 06:13:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 02:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220613.k3M6D2EF004976@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From tmayberr at redhat.com 2006-04-22 02:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > 1. Perhaps, this feature is over. Could you tell me your solution? Don't enable it and remove all references to it from the spec file. The capabilities patch was used to allow a non-root process to change the scheduling policy to SCHED_FIFO and to lock pages in memory using mlock/mlockall. This is now possible using recent kernels(~2.6.12+) and pam(FC5 and devel) by setting the appropriate resource limits in the pam config file /usr/security/limits.conf but I think that is something that should be done explicitly by the user(appropriate documentation would be needed). > 2. No wrong. I've read native README and catch up this feature from it. Can I > use /dev/shm directly instead of %jack_tmpdir? Sorry, I can't give you a definitive answer about that. You might want to check if the FHS says anything but I don't think it is an issue. > 3. By default the portaudio and oss plugins are built. OSS may be disabled in > many cases except non-ALSA cards (How many of such cases? I don't know). > Portaudio may be excluded from BR and we get flexibility of packaging rule > (portaudio library still present at FE repo). More better reason I can't think > out. I was only wondering because AFAIK the portaudio and oss plugins both depend on alsa being in a working state anyway but it really doesn't matter. In response to the idea of an Audio SIG, I am definately interested. I noticed this page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Multimedia has yet to be created... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 06:26:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 02:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189219] Review Request: [Games SIG] poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220626.k3M6QQnX006566@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: [Games SIG] poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189219 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-22 02:26 EST ------- rpmlint output clean. MUST ==== * Spec file named appropriately * Source matches upstream b6feea367ba1c49d85fb04cf5913e2d9 poker-eval-130.0.tar.gz * Spec file legible and in Am. English * No BR: needed * No locales * ldconfig called correctly for .so files * GPL license ok, license file included * %{buildroot} cleaned appropriately * macro usage consistent * contains code, not content * headers and pkgconfig files in -devel * un-suffixed library in -devel * -devel requires base * No .desktop file needed * Builds clean in mock on: FC-4 i386, FC4-x86_64, FC-5 i386, FC-5 x86_64 SHOULD ====== * You might want to let upstream know about the empty directory named '*' in the source tarball. * You might want to suggest to upstream to include the GPL reference at the top of the various .c and .h files. * The C examples would make more sense in an examples/ subdirectory instead of the top level doc dir. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 07:03:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 03:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187304] Review Request: echoping latency meassure tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220703.k3M731Uu011437@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: echoping latency meassure tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187304 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 07:03:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 03:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220703.k3M73Yu4011505@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Bug 187326 depends on bug 187304, which changed state. Bug 187304 Summary: Review Request: echoping latency meassure tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187304 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 07:07:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 03:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186566] Review Request: bsdiff - binary diff/patch utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220707.k3M77TP7011853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsdiff - binary diff/patch utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186566 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2006-04-22 03:07 EST ------- bsdiff is now built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 07:19:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 03:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220719.k3M7Jfbu013766@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-22 03:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > E: perl-CPANPLUS useless-explicit-provides perl(CPANPLUS::Config) > > I don't quite understand the first error; there is no such explicit Provide: > in the .spec so RPM must be generating it. I haven't had a look into this particular case, but this rpmlint error is often seen in cases where a package provides both versioned and unversioned something (through autoprov or not, doesn't matter). The unversioned one satisfies all versioned dependencies people might add in dependent packages, so if there's a versioned one available, it could make sense to get rid of the unversioned one, for example by filtering it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 08:27:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 04:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167983] Review Request: evolution-caldav In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220827.k3M8RSNt024941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-caldav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167983 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 04:27 EST ------- Dave, Are you still interested in packaging this and becoming an FE contributer? I see you need a sponsor, I can sponsor you if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 09:07:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220907.k3M970cp032038@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 05:06 EST ------- Bryon, Jumping in fresh here, I just have been appointed sponsorship rights and as such I'm looking through bugs in FE-NEEDSPONSOR. You are clearly willing to invest time in FE and seem to be doing your best, however sofar things haven't been going really smoothly. Mainly I believe because you've been doing your best too much. I would like to suggest a way out of the current stale-mate, as it would be a pitty to loose a potentially active volunteer for Fedora. Clearly the problem isn't lack of involvement or not investing enough time, so I believe we should be able to work this out. Here is what I suggest: -update your swish-e package to build and work properly under Fedora Core 5, keeping all the packaging and reviewing guidelines into account. -start a new review ticket for swish-e, or if swish-e has dependencies not yet in FE-5 for one of those depencies. This current ticket is to cluttered to be of any use, put me in the CC for this ticket or mention it here. -in this new review do _NOT_ keep posting new versions, if there is a new upstream version, or you have some packaging improvements hold these back, you're free to incorperate those once your innitial submission is approved. But reviewing a target moving as fast as you've been moving in this ticket is nearly impossible. -wait (a week or so) for a full review to be done, a full review can be recognised by the reviewer assigning the bug to him, changing the blocker bug to FE-REVIEW and by a long list of MUST items being checked of one by one. -this full review will probably contain a few must-fix and should-fix items, fix these (and only these, otherwise we have to start over again!) and post a new version. -usually after one iteration, but sometimes more of must-fix -> new release your package will get approved and you are free to import and build it. -After the initial version is approved, you're free to make improvements, but you should still stick to all the guidelines, you no longer need a review for each new release. I hope this can get things moving forward and welcome to the FE community! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 09:13:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220913.k3M9D9tn000573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 05:12 EST ------- Dave, I just saw on fedora-devel that you're alive again a plan working on this this summer again, or am I mixing Dave's now? Anyways if your still alive some sign of live would be nice. A solution for the traceback problem would be even better :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 09:16:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220916.k3M9G3DT000843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 05:15 EST ------- In the mean time I have become a sponsor too, so sponsors a plenty :) Wojciech, Can you please answer John's question: "Please explain the differences this library has from standard gd and why . From the version numbers it appears to be based on the gd version from FC1" ask upstream for clarification if nescesarry, I believe that John is asking a very valid question. If you don't have an answer atleast answer that you don't have an answer, silence is one way to make sure we are not going to get anywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 09:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220919.k3M9Jj6x001206@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 05:19 EST ------- I just got sponsorship rights and as such I'm taking a look at NEEDSPONSOR bugs, also John has become a sponsor some time ago too. So if you could be so kind to show some lifesigns and perhaps even create an updated version which addresses John's initial comments then we can get this moving forward, and hopefully welcome you as an FE contributer :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 09:54:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604220954.k3M9sb3t005990@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-22 05:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > Ah, good point. I suppose one could patch to the latest version released with > ghc-6.4.2. If you could make a patch, I will make a subpackage for openal. > Please build it for FE4 too. :-) I suppose this will need xorg-x11-devel instead of the modular deps... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 10:03:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188601] Review Request: ltsp-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221003.k3MA3w4L007577@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188601 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-04-22 06:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/ltsp-utils/ltsp-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/ltsp-utils/ltsp-utils-0.25-1.src.rpm * Sat Apr 22 2006 - 0.25-1 - rebuild for upstream version 0.25 needs reviewer.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 11:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] New: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/transconnect/transconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/transconnect/ Description: Transconnect is an implementation to allow network connections over a HTTP proxy. This should work under almost all linux distributions using glibc, and all proxies allowing https CONNECT (eg squid). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 11:25:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221125.k3MBPj2o018147@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 175473 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-22 07:25 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 175630 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 11:26:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175630] Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221126.k3MBQfL9018332@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-22 07:26 EST ------- *** Bug 175438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 11:27:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175473] Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221127.k3MBR43J018409@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175473 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|175438 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 11:28:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175473] Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221128.k3MBShCu018629@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175473 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-22 07:28 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 175631 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 11:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221129.k3MBTFUn018691@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175631 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu- | |chemnitz.de ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-22 07:28 EST ------- *** Bug 175473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 12:10:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221210.k3MCAvOU023557@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 davea at sucs.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From davea at sucs.org 2006-04-22 08:10 EST ------- Hans, You've got the right Dave. I just rolled out version 0.4.2 this morning. It fixes the traceback crashing problem, and so should make all 2 of the pyBackPack users out there happy :) I'm looking forward to applying to work on this again over the summer, and will of course give as much help and support as I can to anyone who beats me to the punch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 12:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221232.k3MCWgJT025823@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 08:32 EST ------- Does working on this again include creating a package for FE? Ifso could you post a link to a spec + srpm for 0.4.2 here? Then I can start a review for you and if al goes well sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:07:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221307.k3MD7nwI030035@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From Didier.Moens at dmbr.UGent.be 2006-04-22 09:07 EST ------- (ping) :) SEC got an update last month ; I'll repackage version 2.3.3 this week. (quite eager to contribute but, due to workload, the whole sponsoring thing was just a bit too much (camel's straw) to look into for the last few months) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:09:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221309.k3MD9tGG030292@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 09:09 EST ------- I'm looking forward to a 2.3.3 package to review then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:14:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221314.k3MDEXpS030774@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221314.k3MDEwCl030826@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188400 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:18:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221318.k3MDIQS5031072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-04-22 09:18 EST ------- sorry for the previous modification, first time I am using the depends on / blocks part of buzilla. I am just trying to add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR field... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:18:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221318.k3MDIxpu031214@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188400 OtherBugsDependingO|188400 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221323.k3MDN6QY031579@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-22 09:22 EST ------- Once again apologies for my slowness I was really swamped with work at work lately so much I've even been working my weekends, anyways here's a full review as promised: MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: kismet conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch.kismet E: kismet non-standard-gid /etc/kismet kismet E: kismet non-standard-dir-perm /etc/kismet 0750 E: kismet non-standard-gid /var/lib/kismet kismet E: kismet non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/kismet 0770 E: kismet executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch.kismet E: kismet non-standard-gid /var/log/kismet kismet E: kismet non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/kismet 0730 W: kismet log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/kismet W: kismet-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/kismet-2005-08-R1/libpcap-0.9.1-kis/bpf_filter.c ./bpf/net/bpf_filter.c Most of these are OK / have a good reason, so they are ok, it would be nice if you could fix the last one though, but that is not a blocker. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok (see below) * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs (with some strangeness see Must fix below) * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= *Summary must not start with "A ...." drop the "A " . *These: Requires(pre): %crontabdir Requires(postun): %crontabdir Seem rather odd neither script does anything with cron, the packages does install files in %crontabdir and does not own them, so the package should plain require %crontabdir or better maybe just own it since you made the other related requires (missingok). Should fix: =========== *Redundant BR: ImageMagick-devel already requires libtiff-devel and libjpeg-devel, please remove those from the BR-s *This comment: # set our 'kismet' user, disable GPS and log into ~kismet/logs by Is no longer correct as logs now go to /var/log/kismet *These compiler warnings look really suspicious: gpsmap.cc:868: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data gpsmap.cc:876: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data Nice to have: ============= * Upstream has a much newer version, it would be nice to upgrade to that version. Thats it, if you fix the 2 MUST fix items and post a new spec / srpm I'll aprove it ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 13:35:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221335.k3MDZMXP000987@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From davea at sucs.org 2006-04-22 09:35 EST ------- Spec: http://minus-zero.org/projects/pybackpack/pybackpack.spec SRPM: http://minus-zero.org/projects/pybackpack/pybackpack-0.4.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 14:55:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221455.k3MEt2JS009771@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-04-22 10:54 EST ------- Not an offial review, but some comments: 1) Some suspicious errors during %install phase: Copying miscellaneous dirs... tar: ./check.d/README.doc: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors tar: ./html/integrit.html.doc: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: ./html/ndd.html.doc: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: ./html/ssh.html.doc: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: ./html/aide.html.doc: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: ./html/rootkit.html.doc: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors tar: ./systems/Linux/2/check_xinetd.scripts: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors Copying miscellaneous files... Copying scripts... sed: can't read ./systems/Linux/2/check_xinetd.scripts: Permission denied Copying platform scripts... cp: cannot open `./systems/Linux/2/check_xinetd.scripts' for reading: Permission denied 2) In /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/ some files have an equivalent ending in .orig or .old which are probably backups left during development. I suggest not to package these files: [joost at alexandria SPECS]$ rpm -qil tiger | grep orig /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/check_listeningprocs.orig /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/gen_passwd_sets.orig [joost at alexandria SPECS]$ rpm -qil tiger | grep old /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/0/gen_cron.old /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/services.old 3) In /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/ most files have an equivalent ending in .scripts which are clearly leftovers from an earlier stage of development and left abandoned in 2003. The equivalent files without the .scripts extension all have inline comments dated 2005. I suggest not to package these .scripts files also, unless there is a reason for these that I don't understand. 4) rpmlint errors and warnings: [joost at alexandria SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/joost/Development/rpm/RPMS/i386/tiger-3.2.1-2.i386.rpm W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/cron.d/tiger W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/tiger/cronrc W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/tiger/tiger.ignore W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/tiger/tigerrc E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/default/suid_list E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/tigerrc 0640 E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/tiger.ignore 0600 E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/tiger 0700 W: tiger file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man8/tiger.8.gz E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/cronrc 0640 W: tiger symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/tiger/tigexp /usr/sbin/tigexp E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /etc/tiger 0700 E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/default/rel_file_exp_list E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/rel_file_exp_list E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/tiger/work 0700 E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/check_xinetd.scripts E: tiger script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/check_xinetd.scripts W: tiger devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/tiger/version.h W: tiger log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/tiger Hope this is helpfull.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 15:00:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221500.k3MF0WkI010415@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2006-04-22 11:00 EST ------- Appreciate your comments, suggestions, and thoughts on this packages direction. The ultimate goal of this Swish-e packaging effort has been meet, in a much more reliable and capable manner, by Beagle and other packages. I doubt anyone will be using this as a template/ example for adding functionality to Fedora in the future. Your suggestion of closing this request seems to be the best course of action. Opening a new request for a Swish-e only package meeting all the Fedora guidelines/ standards and similar to other distribution packages is certainly possible. Depending on the level of SELinux support desired, others competent in SELinux policy may or may not be required to add policy to the new Swish-e package and/or the selinux-* packages. My interest in Swish-e and my Swish-e based applications are focused on Swish-e 2.42. In the future, I hope to base my applications on other search technologies, but would like to see a Swish-e package (mine or other) in Fedora to support the Swish-e based versions of my (and others) applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 15:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221513.k3MFDpjE012302@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-22 11:13 EST ------- In this case the issue is: perl(CPANPLUS::Config) perl(CPANPLUS::Config) = 0.050 I thought perhaps that's what the non-functioning filter was for, but that's for requires and this is an errant provide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 16:18:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221618.k3MGIHUW019989@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580 fedora at soeterbroek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at soeterbroek.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-04-22 12:18 EST ------- does not build on FC5: find: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/usr/lib/debug: No such file or directory + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile Processing files: lat-0.8.2-1 error: File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/index/0 error: File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/TOC/0 Processing files: lat-debuginfo-0.8.2-1 RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/index/0 File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/TOC/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 16:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221641.k3MGfj7F022824@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-04-22 12:41 EST ------- Fails make check on FC-5 (i386): >>> TESTING ./heap-checker_unittest with HEAPPROFILE= and HEAPCHECK= In main() HeapChecker: Heap checker is not active, hence checker "all" will do nothing! HeapChecker: To activate set the HEAPCHECK environment variable. HeapChecker: Heap checker is not active, hence checker "trivial" will do nothing! HeapChecker: To activate set the HEAPCHECK environment variable. HeapChecker: Heap checker is not active, hence checker "simple" will do nothing! HeapChecker: To activate set the HEAPCHECK environment variable. HeapChecker: Heap checker is not active, hence checker "trick" will do nothing! HeapChecker: To activate set the HEAPCHECK environment variable. HeapChecker: Heap checker is not active, hence checker "death_simple" will do nothing! HeapChecker: To activate set the HEAPCHECK environment variable. Some liveness flood must be too optimistic HeapChecker: Heap checker is not active, hence checker "death_loop" will do nothing! HeapChecker: To activate set the HEAPCHECK environment variable. Some liveness flood must be too optimistic ./src/tests/heap-checker_unittest.sh: line 59: 23551 Segmentation fault $HEAP_CHECKER make[1]: *** [heap_checker_unittest_sh] Error 139 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/spot/rpmbuild/BUILD/google-perftools-0.7' make: *** [check-am] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 16:53:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221653.k3MGrEJc023908@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-22 12:53 EST ------- I started on a review, but the package fails to build in mock: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/valid....Can't locate Mail/Address.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/Email-Valid-0.15/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/Email-Valid-0.15/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at /builddir/build/BUILD/Email-Valid-0.15/blib/lib/Email/Valid.pm line 9. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/Email-Valid-0.15/blib/lib/Email/Valid.pm line 9. Compilation failed in require at t/valid.t line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/valid.t line 11. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-12 Failed 12/12 tests, 0.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/valid.t 2 512 12 23 191.67% 1-12 Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 12/12 subtests failed, 0.00% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55843 (%check) I believe you're missing a BuildRequires: perl(Mail::Address), but after adding it things fail again: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/valid....unable to locate nslookup at t/valid.t line 46 dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 9-12 Failed 4/12 tests, 66.67% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/valid.t 2 512 12 8 66.67% 9-12 Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 4/12 subtests failed, 66.67% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.47536 (%check) which indicates that you need a BuildRequires: /usr/bin/nslookup or BuildRequires: bind-utils. Adding the former leads me to: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/valid....FAILED test 9 Failed 1/12 tests, 91.67% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/valid.t 12 1 8.33% 9 Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/12 subtests failed, 91.67% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.17873 (%check) at which point I'm out of ideas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:09:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221709.k3MH9r5m025324@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-04-22 13:09 EST ------- Seems like Eterm has too confusing license terms for Extras, see #182173. I give up and setting WONTFIX, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:10:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221710.k3MHAa2E025436@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Bug 182173 depends on bug 182175, which changed state. Bug 182175 Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221712.k3MHCFFZ025550@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-22 13:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > does not build on FC5: > > find: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/usr/lib/debug: No such file or directory > + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile > Processing files: lat-0.8.2-1 > error: File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/index/0 > error: File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/TOC/0 > Processing files: lat-debuginfo-0.8.2-1 > > > RPM build errors: > File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/index/0 > File not found: /var/tmp/lat-0.8.2-root/var/scrollkeeper/TOC/ We knew that from Comment #1. There's an updated spec for lat 1.0.4 in Comment #4 but it seems from Comment #6 that Dave doesn't really want to maintain this package anyway (and neither do I as it's not something I use except on a very occasional basis). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221712.k3MHCcgt025622@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-04-22 13:12 EST ------- Ok, I give up for now. No Eterm package in Extras, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:16:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221716.k3MHGmsY026001@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:16:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221716.k3MHGmap026016@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:20:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221720.k3MHKdpQ026441@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-22 13:20 EST ------- Eterm may not be able to get in, but would it be worth having libast regardless? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 17:29:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221729.k3MHT4gP027139@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-04-22 13:29 EST ------- Maybe, however I don't know of any software project using the lib except Eterm. If anyone will use the spec file I have created, they are welcome... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 18:35:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221835.k3MIZe6Y006811@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-04-22 14:35 EST ------- In response to comment #15: good catch. That change should be made. Deji: Are you still around? Do you still want to maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 18:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189373] Review Request: iperf -- measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221849.k3MInbRL010538@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iperf -- measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189373 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-22 14:49 EST ------- - rpmlint checks clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_x64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - runs APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 19:05:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221905.k3MJ5K54012578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-22 15:05 EST ------- NEEDSWORK MD5SUMS: c7dc1e91123ea940d13eaa0cce396ffc perl-Module-Info-0.30-1.src.rpm a1e4e39cceda93dc0ab2d296b5075d76 Module-Info-0.30.tar.gz dab0c42046cd186526f35a1f951758fd perl-Module-Info.spec Good: * CPAN tarball MD5 digest matched the inclued tarball * URL and Source URL are valid * License verified (main POD page, Build.PL) * perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_xxx) present * perl vendor libs present * File permissions are ok * No critical bugs in http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bugs.html?Dist=Module-Info Needswork: * missing build requirements BuildRequires: perl(version) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) * missing requirement Requires: perl(version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 19:22:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221922.k3MJMwXE014311@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-22 15:22 EST ------- Not building on x86_64, missing some assembly: /usr/bin/gapi2-fixup: line 3: which: command not found cannot open assembly ./../lib/gtk-sharp-2.0/gapi-fixup.exe make[1]: *** [gtksourceview-api.xml] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 19:33:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221933.k3MJXDeU015109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-22 15:33 EST ------- There are all sorts of problems with Mono, /usr/lib and /usr/lib64. Building under x86_64 is broken because of another bug in the glibc-kernheaders as well (reported, but I've not seen a fix for it). You'll probably find gapi-fixup in /usr/lib64/gtk-sharp-2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 19:41:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604221941.k3MJf1fi015892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-04-22 15:41 EST ------- Hi all, I'm still around ;) I'm sorry I've almost forgotten the package is still at this stage. I've change the license tag to MIT (I can't find any reference to STL anywhere in the source). newer spec and src.rpm files are at the usual place; ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/xcompmgr/xcompmgr.spec ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/xcompmgr/xcompmgr-1.1.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222107.k3ML7BEJ023562@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2006-04-22 17:06 EST ------- BTW, There are large number of fixes in cvs. (including the odd rdesktop problem.) Any idea when 1.3.4 will be out? G. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:11:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222111.k3MLBwqb023950@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-22 17:11 EST ------- Not building in mock. Should move Requires: glib2 to BuildRequires: glib2-devel checking for glib-2.0 >= 2.0.0... Package glib-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `glib-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'glib-2.0' found configure: error: Library requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.0.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:13:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222113.k3MLDuTl024232@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |178900, 178901, 189092, | |189093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:14:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222114.k3MLET3S024301@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |178904 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:14:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222114.k3MLEpZf024334@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |178904 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:15:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222115.k3MLFDqX024400@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |178904 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:15:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222115.k3MLFZkv024456@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |178904 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222123.k3MLNm23026315@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-04-22 17:23 EST ------- > Hope this is helpfull Extremely useful, thanks a lot. * Sat Apr 22 2006 Aurelien Bompard 3.2.1-3 - don't backup some patches, or the files will be copied in the buildroot - set conf files to noreplace - fix manpage encoding Spec : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/tiger.spec SRPM : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/tiger-3.2.1-3.src.rpm (1) and (3) are fixed by not making backups for some patches (2) is fixed by removing the files in %prep (4) rpmlint : > W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/cron.d/tiger > W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/tiger/tiger.ignore > W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/tiger/tigerrc Fixed. > W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/tiger/cronrc This one is not supposed to be customized, so I leave it as %config only. > E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/tigerrc 0640 > E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/tiger.ignore 0600 > E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/tiger 0700 > E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/cronrc 0640 > E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /etc/tiger 0700 > E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/tiger/work 0700 > E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/default/suid_list > E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/default/rel_file_exp_list > E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/rel_file_exp_list Intended. > W: tiger file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man8/tiger.8.gz Fixed. > W: tiger symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/tiger/tigexp /usr/sbin/tigexp > W: tiger devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/tiger/version.h Harmless. > E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/check_xinetd.scripts > E: tiger script-without-shellbang /usr/[...]/Linux/2/check_xinetd.scripts Fixed by not backuping this patch > W: tiger log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/tiger Tiger takes care of rotation by itself. Thanks for your input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:31:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189678] New: Review Request: perl-List-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in List::Util Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189678 Summary: Review Request: perl-List-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in List::Util Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-List-MoreUtils-0.19-1.src.rpm Description: List::MoreUtils provides some trivial but commonly needed functionality on lists which is not going to go into List::Util. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 21:36:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222136.k3MLaoCY028514@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-22 17:36 EST ------- Not building. Processing files: boo-0.7.5.2013-3 error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/boo-0.7.5.2013-3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gtksourceview-1.0/language-specs/* error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/boo-0.7.5.2013-3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/mime/packages/* Consider using cp -p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 22:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222217.k3MMHDI6032414@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-22 18:17 EST ------- FC5 ruby-1.8.4-3.2 $ ruby -e 'puts $:' /usr/lib64/site_ruby/1.8 /usr/lib64/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux /usr/lib64/site_ruby /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8 /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux . $ ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"]' /usr/lib64/site_ruby/1.8 $ rpm -qlp facter-1.1.4-4.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/facter /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter.rb /usr/share/doc/facter-1.1.4 /usr/share/doc/facter-1.1.4/CHANGELOG /usr/share/doc/facter-1.1.4/COPYING /usr/share/doc/facter-1.1.4/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/facter-1.1.4/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/facter-1.1.4/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 22:18:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222218.k3MMIBng032653@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-22 18:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Is 1.13-2 acceptable in its current form, or should I not remove the execute bits? > > You could leave the exec bits on. The extra dependencies you get as a result of > this are: > > * /usr/bin/perl > * perl(Curses) > * perl(ExtUtils::testlib) > > perl(Curses) is provided by the package itself, and the other two are provided > by the main perl package, which is already a dependency of this package. So > there aren't any new dependencies introduced by leaving the exec bits on. 1) IIRC there are plans to disallowed this in the future (no docs with execution permissions). Even rpmlint already warns about requirements being pulled in by doc files: W: perl-Curses doc-file-dependency ... 2) Right now the only way to avoid the requirements pulled in by perl modules (.pm files) shipped as doc is to filter them out. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 22:30:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222230.k3MMUj3s001451@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-22 18:30 EST ------- PUBLISH++ MD5SUMS: 4cf5520405d5a24fac3a4b3d60db516d perl-Curses-1.13-3.src.rpm 33f6a17f9ece7efda2dde3431e1540f6 Curses-1.13.tgz 07deea06fa73cb099cf7d77a8e5d3b8b perl-Curses.spec Good: * CPAN tarball MD5 digest matches the one included in the SRPM * URL and Source URL are valid * License verified (README file) * Build Requirements are correct * perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_xxx) present * perl vendor libs present * Builds without problems in FC-3 and FC-5 * (Un)installs without problems in FC-3 and FC-5 * The demo files run correctly * No relevant bugs http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bugs.html?Dist=Curses Minor notes: * the comment in the %files section could/should be dropped * see previous comment about executable doc files This a my vote for publishing this package. As this package has several reviewers, the final approval should be done by Jochen Schmitt (the first reviewer). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 22:33:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222233.k3MMXJeA001676@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-22 18:33 EST ------- Close! Needs libxml2-devel though. Still don't build: checking for libxml-2.0 >= 2.2.8... Package libxml-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. This should be the case for the others, change all your BuildRequires to *-devel. Also, use the %find_lang macro for locales. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 22:49:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222249.k3MMn6Bj003127@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From wk at ire.pw.edu.pl 2006-04-22 18:49 EST ------- The differences are surprisingly small. The only significant difference is the direction of drawing arcs. This can be compensated by changing one line in libgeda. Now I am testing the libgeda with gd 2.0.33 and it seems that it is working fine. So in my opinion libgdgeda can be dropped completly. The only problem now is that nor gd or libgd.so.2 is in REQUIRES. Wojciech Kazubski -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 22:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222251.k3MMpxNI003375@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-22 18:51 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta-gdl.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta-gdl-0.6.0-4.src.rpm Description: %find_lang reports that there is nothing to find. Changed the BRs to -devel Added a couple of Reqs Fixed a small fault that caused a problem on the x86 box for no apparent reason! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:01:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179802] Review Request: seamonkey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222301.k3MN1O6N004249@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seamonkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179802 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222302.k3MN2U9n004404@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|179802 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:02:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188351] Review Request: gphpedit - GNOME2 PHP editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222302.k3MN2b5v004425@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gphpedit - GNOME2 PHP editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188351 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:03:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222303.k3MN3VgP004574@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-22 19:03 EST ------- As long as the reviewers are disagreeing with each other, I'll throw in my own opinion :) In the interest of maintaining a strict seperation of code and data, %doc files should not be executable. Whoever added the "doc-file-dependency" warning to rpmlint was wise, and should take the next step of printing an error for exec bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:04:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222304.k3MN4SxK004657@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-22 19:04 EST ------- I'm a bit confused about your needswork items: Last week, BuildRequires: perl wasn't permitted; now it's optional, but it seems that here you're requiring it. Is that what you're asking for, or am I confused? And this package already (as I look at it now, at least) has the usual Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) so why would a separate Requires: perl(version) be needed? Just trying to understand these things so I can do better reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:06:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176200] Review Request: Mud Magic Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222306.k3MN6YfX004859@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mud Magic Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176200 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222307.k3MN76FQ004913@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|176200 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:07:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222307.k3MN7F9f004952@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: torque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:07:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222307.k3MN7RiY005003@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|188105 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:09:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188395] Review Request: gnomeradio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222309.k3MN96DC005130@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188395 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:10:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189091] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222310.k3MNAB9I005266@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189091 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:10:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188083] Review Request: pipenightdreams - Connect the waterpipes to create a proper pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222310.k3MNA13L005231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipenightdreams - Connect the waterpipes to create a proper pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188083 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:10:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189149] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222310.k3MNAcXY005351@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189149 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:11:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222311.k3MNBENN005391@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-22 19:11 EST ------- Apologies - I have been travelling madly the past month, and have returned proper this evening. I will complete the muse submission tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:17:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222317.k3MNHXhX005815@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-22 19:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm a bit confused about your needswork items: > > Last week, BuildRequires: perl wasn't permitted; now it's optional, but it seems > that here you're requiring it. Is that what you're asking for, or am I confused? No, I am not requiring perl. Module::Info can be extened to use version objects provided by the perl version module. $ rpm -q --whatprovides "perl(version)" perl-version-0.59-1.fc5 > And this package already (as I look at it now, at least) has the usual > > Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) > > so why would a separate Requires: perl(version) be needed? perl(version) represents a perl module available in CPAN (and already in Extras). the statement "%{__perl} -V:version" prints one of the perl configuration variables. $ perl -V:version version='5.8.8'; Note: the rpm perl scripts fail to detect required modules. They only look for use statements and ignore require statements (among other things they fail to look for like system calls, backticks, open with pipes, ...). Hope this helps, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222323.k3MNN6iF006176@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-22 19:22 EST ------- When I tried BR: perl(version), "make test" still complained about missing version.pm, so I dropped the line. I'm guessing that's an upstream bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:25:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222325.k3MNPLW7006331@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-04-22 19:25 EST ------- [...] t/n3_version.............ok 6/14 skipped: version.pm found, can not test [...] $ rpm -q perl-version perl-version-0.59-1.fc4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222328.k3MNSVYt006488@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-22 19:28 EST ------- No. It found the version module (... version.pm found ...). The n3_version test script has two subset tests: one subset if it finds the version object, a second if it doesn't found, and it skips one of them. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222331.k3MNVaCe006690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-22 19:31 EST ------- Simply the following will do, too (but I admit it's ugly): %find_lang .\*ardour.\* %files -f .\*ardour.\*.lang For those interested in the details, the argument of %find_lang is a regular expression _and_ filename prefix. The argument of %files -f is a filename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:43:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] New: Review Request: Anjuta2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta2.spec Description: Anjuta2 is the new version of the popular IDE, Anjuta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 22 23:45:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604222345.k3MNjPQp007574@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Anjuta2 |Review Request: Anjuta2 BugsThisDependsOn| |189324 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-22 19:45 EST ------- I am unable to build the package on my x86_64 test rig due to BZ #189324. I will see if I can get it working on an x86 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 00:01:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188601] Review Request: ltsp-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230001.k3N011T4008548@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188601 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-22 20:00 EST ------- I attach a patch that adds a %clean section, use macros and with attr simplifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 00:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188601] Review Request: ltsp-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230002.k3N02U1D008678@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188601 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-22 20:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128119) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128119&action=view) spec file cleanings, use macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 01:14:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230114.k3N1EdWX014871@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-04-22 21:14 EST ------- Strange .. it looks like the rpm was built on a machine that had Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] set to /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8. Are you sure the rpm wasn't built against a newer ruby package (e.g., the new 1.8.4-4 test packages that Akira Tagoh has put out) ? Those moved site_ruby from %_libdir to %_libdir/ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 02:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230244.k3N2iMI4024467@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-22 22:44 EST ------- Sorry for being dense; I understand now what you were asking for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 03:00:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230300.k3N30u6U025697@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-22 23:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > This is example: Thanks. Here are updated bits using %find_lang... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour-0.99.2-3.src.rpm I believe this SRPM addresses every point raised so far. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 03:05:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230305.k3N35UIm025985@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-04-22 23:05 EST ------- Hi Terje, Its not at all your fault. Thank you for trying to package it. Its a shame that upstream could not or would not sort out the licenses. I liked Eterm and used it and Enlightenment for a few years. When I started, I had no idea this would be the outcome of this review. Its not what I wanted. Bummer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 03:35:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189081] Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230335.k3N3ZO1k028385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-22 23:35 EST ------- I'm assuming perl-Module-Info will be approved, so I'll go ahead and review this. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 9acb4eb0737bb041e9ece8ad08e127c3 Test-Prereq-1.030.tar.gz 9acb4eb0737bb041e9ece8ad08e127c3 Test-Prereq-1.030.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present but necessarily disabled. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 03:58:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189678] Review Request: perl-List-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in List::Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230358.k3N3wYAx030123@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-List-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in List::Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189678 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-22 23:58 EST ------- Nothing much to say - Clean package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 04:17:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 00:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] New: Review Request: swh-plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/swh-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/swh-plugins-0.4.14-1.src.rpm Description: A set of audio plugins for LADSPA (see http://plugin.org.uk/ for more details). These are useful for ardour, which I submitted for review a few days ago. This is based on an old ccrma spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 04:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 00:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230432.k3N4Wgul032617@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-23 00:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Should we start an Audio SIG? I'm all for this. I've been queing up some audio packages for submission here: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 04:49:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 00:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189084] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230449.k3N4nTIW002048@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189084 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 00:49 EST ------- One duplicated dependency: perl(Module::Load) perl(Module::Load) >= 0.1 not a blocker. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 0551cb0b17babcbdef284d5b502731a4 Graphics-ColorNames-1.06.tar.gz 0551cb0b17babcbdef284d5b502731a4 Graphics-ColorNames-1.06.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386). * rpmlint is silent. O final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 05:01:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230501.k3N51BvI002790@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 01:00 EST ------- It seems that version 1.2.0 is out; any reason not to submit the updated version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 05:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230514.k3N5EJSl003722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 01:14 EST ------- BTW, recent guideline changes permit gcc-c++ in BuildRequires:, even though it's probably cleaner to leave it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 05:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230518.k3N5I9GV004006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-23 01:17 EST ------- Changes in this iteration: - Cleaned up tetris-bsd so that it minimizes the amount of code that runs setgid. - Added patch set from Debian's package that, among other things, fixes CVE-2006-1744 - Renamed monop to mpoly to remove conflict with mono-devel Hack has more variable game data than just the scoreboard. There are also bones files from dead players. As such, I'm leaving the scoreboard in /var/games/hack/. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games-2.17-4.src.rpm There are still a few remaining issues to resolve: * modify bones-file handling in hack so that we can drop setgid earlier * Take a closer look at sail and phantasia to see if the amount of setgid code can be minimized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 05:24:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186391] Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230524.k3N5Ojpj004403@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186391 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 01:24 EST ------- Is there any potential for harm from using this? I can't see why it should be kept out of Extras just because it invokes deep magic. It's certainly useful to those who have no alternative, and I'm not confident that the built-in modesetting stuff will be finished within the time that FC5 is still receiving active maintenance. If, on the other hand, it can fry machines.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 05:56:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189157] Review Request: aspell-he In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230556.k3N5uLk6006780@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-he https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189157 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 01:56 EST ------- Some suggestions: Add a comment explaining why the package can't be noarch. (I'm assuming the dictionary files are endian or word-length dependent, although the files are exactly the same on i386 and x86_64.) It would be nice to have some definitive statement on the matter from the aspell authors; I looked through their documentation but didn't see anything, and I have no PPC machine to test with. Remove commented items in the specfile, like the Epoch: line or the last line of %files. Consider using a here document instead of a bunch of echo statements in %build. Personal taste; I think it just looks cleaner but it's up to you. Issues: rpmlint complains: E: aspell-he no-binary E: aspell-he only-non-binary-in-usr-lib If we assume that endianness issues prevent the package form being noarch, both of these are indeed pointless. The package isn't supposed to have a binary and it's not possible to put things in /usr/share because the data is not system-independent. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and is included as %doc. * source files match upstream: f453989e1df364af9479e893c16ac9d8 aspell6-he-0.9-0.tar.bz2 f453989e1df364af9479e893c16ac9d8 aspell6-he-0.9-0.tar.bz2-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). O rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * creates no non-doc directories. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * no %check present; no test suite upstream. * content only, but clearly permissible. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 06:13:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 02:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189219] Review Request: [Games SIG] poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230613.k3N6D1oL007810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: [Games SIG] poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189219 tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-04-23 02:12 EST ------- - Empty dir '*' in tarball was caused by a bug in automake which has been worked around in CVS and the directory will be gone in the poker-eval-131 version. - GPL references have been fixed and will show up in the poker-eval-131 version. - Spec file has been fixed so that the .c files in devel's %doc are now contained in a samples/ folder and this will be in release 3 rpm of poker-eval-130 version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 06:21:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 02:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230621.k3N6Lxv8008326@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-04-23 02:21 EST ------- I see now that the author's web page has been updated to reflect a 1.2.0 release, and I will be happy to update the spec file and SRPM to the new release, except that the link on the web page is broken, so the new tarball has apparently not actually been uploaded yet. I'll check again later, but at the moment, it seems the SRPM I created is still the most current available release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 07:16:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230716.k3N7G3oo013378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-23 03:16 EST ------- Several issues: 1. The reason for your problems with find_lang is you not correctly using %find_lang. You will want something similar to this: %install ... %find_lang gdl-1 ... %files -f gdl-1.lang ... 2. AFAIS, this package doesn't need nor use libglade. It seems to use libglade2. 3. I don't see why this package should explicitly Requires: gtk2 4. Use %configure --disable-shared instead removing *.as 5. Terminating 'dot' at the end of Summary-lines 1+2 are blockers, 3+4 are minor issues, 5 is FE-stylishness. On top of that, I am pretty sure the *-devel package misses many deps on other *-devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 07:18:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230718.k3N7I2OP013677@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-23 03:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128125) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128125&action=view) Proposed patch to the spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 09:08:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 05:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188601] Review Request: ltsp-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604230908.k3N98wVM013552@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188601 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-04-23 05:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/ltsp-utils/ltsp-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/ltsp-utils/ltsp-utils-0.25-2.src.rpm * Sun Apr 23 2006 Joost Soeterbroek - 0.25-2 - applied patch pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 10:06:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189157] Review Request: aspell-he In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231006.k3NA6rN5020680@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-he https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189157 ------- Additional Comments From danken at cs.technion.ac.il 2006-04-23 06:06 EST ------- I cleaned up the spec file as you asked, and put the new version in http://ivrix.org.il/redhat/aspell-he.spec and the new srpm in http://ivrix.org.il/redhat/aspell-he-0.9-2.src.rpm . As you asked, I asked the developer of Aspell, Kevin Atkinson, about the byte-ordering issue. His brief reply, dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 02:47:11 -0600 (MDT) follows: On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: >Dear Kevin, > >If you recall, once we were working together on the Hebrew support in >aspell-0.60. I want to push this support into Fedora, but something about it >worries their automated cleanliness-checking tool (rpmlint). > >Why does aspell's dictionaries sit under /usr/lib/aspell-0.60 ? What causes >them to be architecture-dependent? Is it byte-order issues? Yes, its byte-order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:06:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231106.k3NB60Da026970@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:06:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231106.k3NB6XR9027037@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:07:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231107.k3NB792m027121@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:07:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231107.k3NB7WpM027167@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189309 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:08:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231108.k3NB8fwF027241@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231109.k3NB9CP2027281@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:18:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231118.k3NBIwx9027941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-23 07:18 EST ------- I've just updates the bits based on recent experience and expected feedback... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf-0.4.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:23:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231123.k3NBNlkb028355@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-04-23 07:23 EST ------- * Sat Apr 22 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.0.2006.04.R1-1 - updated to 2006-04-R1 - fixed/improved some ./configure checks - removed the starting 'A' from the summary - added a bunch of patches fixing compiler warnings http://ensc.de/fedora/kismet/kismet.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/kismet/ =========== > *Summary must not start with "A ...." drop the "A " . I could not find such a rule in the packaging guidelines and from my linguistic feeling, a leading "A " sounds better. But ok; I am not a native english speaker so I believe you and removed the "A ". > *These: > Requires(pre): %crontabdir > Requires(postun): %crontabdir ... are required resp. the best current way to express: * the directory must exist before the package places files into it. Else, when the directory is a symlink (e.g. compare /etc/init.d) in the owning package, you will create oddities. * the package must be removed before the directory. Else, the directory can not be removed because it still contains files from 'kismet' and becomes orphaned. Therefore, a strict '%crontabdir -> kismet' order on installation, and 'kismet -> %crontabdir' order on uninstallation is required. A plain 'Requires:' does not *guarantees* such an order. > W: kismet-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/kismet-2005-08-R1/libpcap-0.9.1-kis/bpf_filter.c ./bpf/net/bpf_filter.c > Most of these are OK / have a good reason, so they are ok, it would > be nice if you could fix the last one though, but that is not a > blocker. I think this is a bug in rpm's debuginfo-generator and do not know how to solve it cleanly. > *Redundant BR: ImageMagick-devel already requires libtiff-devel and > libjpeg-devel, please remove those from the BR-s required for the FC4 ImageMagick-devel and they do not hurt on FC5; I added a comment to explain it. > *This comment: > # set our 'kismet' user, disable GPS and log into ~kismet/logs by > Is no longer correct as logs now go to /var/log/kismet thx, fixed it > *These compiler warnings look really suspicious: don't occur anymore in recent version, but... > * Upstream has a much newer version, it would be nice to upgrade to > that version. ok, updated to it. But... it causes ugly warnings and I created a lot of patches fixing them. They are reported upstream; see http://www.kismetwireless.net/Forum/General/Messages/1145789909.7993579 I know that they are making the new package different to this one reviewed by you, but I think they are required (at least the -packed and -alias patches). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:34:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231134.k3NBYJQb029480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-23 07:34 EST ------- Here are the updated bits, including Michael's spec file patch and additional changes to address his other concerns... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/raptor.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/raptor-1.4.8-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 11:41:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231141.k3NBfss5030673@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-23 07:41 EST ------- * Until raptor-devel will be good, this one BuildRequires: libxslt-devel * Run rpmlint on the binary rpms: Lots of output, in particular because the included "examples" %doc directory contains arch-dependent files (it MUST NOT), including unfinished libtool based executables in the hidden .libs directory, object files, and dependency meta data files in the hidden .deps directory. * rpmqfcheck.pl /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/liblrdf-0.4.0-3.i386.rpm Orphaned dir: /usr/share/ladspa Orphaned dir: /usr/share/ladspa/rdf * Source0 would be directly downloadable if in the form: http://download.sourceforge.net/... or http://dl.sf.net/... * Static libraries should not be included. * Noticable compiler warnings: showdefaults.c:42: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' setting_test.c:43: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' lrdf.c:596: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'raptor_new_uri' differ in signedness lrdf.c:597: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'raptor_new_uri' differ in signedness -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 12:20:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231220.k3NCKxQH000718@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-23 08:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > The differences are surprisingly small. The only significant difference is the > direction of drawing arcs. This can be compensated by changing one line in > libgeda. Now I am testing the libgeda with gd 2.0.33 and it seems that it is > working fine. So in my opinion libgdgeda can be dropped completly. The only > problem now is that nor gd or libgd.so.2 is in REQUIRES. You're saying you've replaced libgdgeda-devel with gd-devel as the buildreq for libgeda and the resulting package doesn't have an auto-dep on libgd.so.2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 12:23:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] New: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/gnucap.spec SRPM URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/gnucap-0.34-1.src.rpm Description: The primary component is a general purpose circuit simulator. It performs nonlinear dc and transient analyses, fourier analysis, and ac analysis. Spic compatible models for the MOSFET (level 1-7), BJT, and diode are included in this release. Gnucap is not based on Spice, but some of the models have been derived from the Berkeley models. Unlike Spice, the engine is designed to do true mixed-mode simulation. Most of the code is in place for future support event driven analog simulation, and true multi-rate simulation. --- Notice I mainly packaged this because its a dependency for gcompris (http://gcompris.net). Their are newer snapshot versions available from geda but those segfault when used with gcompris generated netlists, so I've decided to stick with the latest official release which also actually works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 12:31:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188601] Review Request: ltsp-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231231.k3NCV7xw001555@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188601 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-23 08:30 EST ------- * rpmlint silent * source match upstream * licence ok, included * spec legible * %clean section * right files * use macros onsistently APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 12:31:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231231.k3NCVQia001659@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-23 08:31 EST ------- Thanks for looking at this. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf-0.4.0-4.src.rpm (In reply to comment #2) > * Until raptor-devel will be good, this one BuildRequires: libxslt-devel I've submitted a fixed raptor spec file. > * Run rpmlint on the binary rpms: > > Lots of output, in particular because the included "examples" %doc > directory contains arch-dependent files (it MUST NOT), including > unfinished libtool based executables in the hidden .libs directory, > object files, and dependency meta data files in the hidden .deps > directory. I've removed examples from the doc list, and added a README.fedora file to point people at the SRPM for example source code. > * rpmqfcheck.pl /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/liblrdf-0.4.0-3.i386.rpm > Orphaned dir: /usr/share/ladspa > Orphaned dir: /usr/share/ladspa/rdf I'm not sure who should own these directories. Perhaps this package should own /usr/share/ladspa/rdf, and ladspa could own /usr/share/ladspa - although there's no real need to install the ladspa package when using ladspa plugins. Suggestions? > * Source0 would be directly downloadable if in the form: > http://download.sourceforge.net/... > or > http://dl.sf.net/... Fixed. > * Static libraries should not be included. Fixed. Configured with --disable-static. > * Noticable compiler warnings: > > showdefaults.c:42: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has > type 'long unsigned int' > setting_test.c:43: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has > type 'long unsigned int' This is from the example directory, which is ignored now. > lrdf.c:596: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'raptor_new_uri' > differ in signedness > lrdf.c:597: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'raptor_new_uri' > differ in signedness I will push this upstream rather than try to handle it here. It's a signed-vs-unsigned char thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 13:17:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231317.k3NDHqtH006171@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-23 09:17 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta-gdl.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta-gdl-0.6.0-5.src.rpm Description: Fixes as proposed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 13:27:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188601] Review Request: ltsp-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231327.k3NDRsGf006916@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188601 fedora at soeterbroek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-04-23 09:27 EST ------- 8116 (ltsp-utils): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/8116-ltsp-utils-0.25-2/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 13:58:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231358.k3NDwPGk010234@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-23 09:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Sorry for being dense; I understand now what you were asking for. No problem Jason. I am starting to collect a few cases where requirements aren't detected by the perl.req script. Will send you a draft version in a couple of minutes. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 14:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189705] New: Review Request: aiccu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189705 Summary: Review Request: aiccu Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Matt_Domsch at dell.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/extras/aiccu/aiccu.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/extras/aiccu/aiccu-2005.01.31-2.src.rpm Description: This client automatically gives one IPv6 connectivity without having to manually configure interfaces etc. One does need a SixXS account and at least a tunnel. These can be freely & gratis requested from the SixXS website. For more information about SixXS check http://www.sixxs.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 17:34:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189157] Review Request: aspell-he In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231734.k3NHYYuL029955@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-he https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189157 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 13:34 EST ------- Thanks for tracking down this explanation; this may have been known to the Core aspell maintainer but in Extras we like to have the specfiles as self-explanatory as possible. Everything looks good, except for a couple of things which you can fix when checking in. Extras standards indicate that the buildroot should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) and there's no reason to clean out the buildroot at the beginning of %prep. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 17:38:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231738.k3NHc5rm030543@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-23 13:38 EST ------- OK - I have submitted the package, updated the owners.list file and requested CVS branches - can't do more until that happens. However, and related to comment #16, the package naming issue oddity came up again. To recap, the SRPM is called muse-version.srpm, and it generates: muse-version.rpm emacs-muse-version.noarch.rpm emacs-muse-el-version.noarch.rpm xemacs-muse-version.noarch.rpm xemacs-muse-el-version.noarch.rpm So, the question is, what should I have used for the module name in owners.list ? I entered "emacs-muse", but on reflection I perhaps should have entered "muse". The issue then is that the module name no longer has the emacs- or xemacs- part in it, as required by the fedora-extras guidelines, even though (some of) the rpms do. In short, the fedora-extras guidelines fail for "addon" packages for sources which generate add-ons for two different programs (in this case emacs and xemacs). Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 17:39:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] Review Request: swh-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231739.k3NHdO8f030778@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-23 13:39 EST ------- I'll do a formal review on this later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 17:56:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231756.k3NHuiiP031935@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-04-23 13:56 EST ------- I think we should just call the CVS directory and SRPM "emacs-muse". Any other opinions? Jonathan, your CVSSyncNeeded request "FC-5 FC-6 (devel) muse" is improper. There is FC-6 branch, and devel is implicit from import, so the only branch you really needed was FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:03:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189712] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189712 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: fedora at soeterbroek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gnubg/gnubg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gnubg/gnubg-20060423-1.src.rpm Description: GNU Backgammon is software for playing and analysing backgammon positions, games and matches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:04:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189713] New: Review Request: gnubg Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713 Summary: Review Request: gnubg Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: fedora at soeterbroek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gnubg/gnubg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gnubg/gnubg-20060423-1.src.rpm Description: GNU Backgammon is software for playing and analysing backgammon positions, games and matches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:06:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189712] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231806.k3NI687F000363@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189712 fedora at soeterbroek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|package name here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-04-23 14:06 EST ------- see 189713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:08:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231808.k3NI8JlN000731@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-23 14:08 EST ------- Warren - apologies for the incorrect CVS sync request - I am still learning :). Regarding the CVS directory and SRPM name - the problems with calling it emacs-muse are: 1) It doesn't match the source tarball name (as is required by FE guidelines) 2) emacs-muse is confusing when you consider it also builds xemacs addon packages. (emacs-muse is actually the name I originally chose until people requested xemacs packages be built too) Problem is, I could come up with problems for any naming scheme. Basically, the FE guidelines are impossible to comply with in this case. The same issue is faced by any package which builds addon elisp packages for both emacs and xemacs from the same source.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:11:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189678] Review Request: perl-List-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in List::Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231811.k3NIBFB2001114@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-List-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in List::Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189678 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-23 14:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231812.k3NICUhd001359@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-23 14:12 EST ------- Build currently fails for devel for which FE has a beta version of xemacs (unwise, I think) - reported upstream: https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=4682 Build log: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/8125-muse-3.02.6b-4.fc6/noarch/build.log Once the FC5 CVS branch is made, I'll request a build of the package for that, where I know it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188429] Review Request: glib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231813.k3NID39F001461@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188429 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-23 14:12 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I don't remember seeing bugmails about the progress made here. 1.2.10-20 looks good, approved. (Even though glib is legacy stuff, this particular package probably won't ever enter < FC6, so the "|| :" is indeed very much superfluous...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:13:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231813.k3NIDmHa001610@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:15:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189712] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231815.k3NIF1AC001809@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189712 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:15:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231815.k3NIFsdw001939@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-04-23 14:15 EST ------- I think the module name should just be 'muse' - other packages do it this way (see 'mew') - it's the name of the base source tar - there is no confusion about it being for only emacs/xemacs thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:27:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231827.k3NIRla5003726@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-23 14:27 EST ------- QStapler, from my view the demo files should be contains in the %doc section, becouse the aint of this file is to demonstrate the use of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:38:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187235] Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231838.k3NIcbG2005976@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187235 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Matt_Domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Matt_Domsch at dell.com ------- Additional Comments From Matt_Domsch at dell.com 2006-04-23 14:38 EST ------- looks quite good (nice cleanup from my attempt last fall!). A few nits which can be fixed at CVS checkin time: Please chkconfig --add only on initial install, not upgrade. %post if [ $1 = 1 ]; then /sbin/chkconfig --add ices fi config(noreplace) the logrotate file: %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ices APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187235] Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231843.k3NIhla8006923@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187235 Matt_Domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 18:51:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185288] Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231851.k3NIpe9T007973@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185288 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-23 14:51 EST ------- Fixed version builds fine. APPROVED as per comment 3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 19:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231905.k3NJ55AN009523@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-23 15:05 EST ------- Thank you Petro for the Co-Review. Form my point the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 19:24:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231924.k3NJONJi011091@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 15:24 EST ------- Odd, but I'm sure it will work itself out. I'll review the current version. Issues: The empty %doc; you should probably package README.txt and ChangeLog. Generally .pyo files are %ghost'ed instead of being packaged (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python), although now that RPM byte-compiles everything in sight I'm wondering if the guidelines shouldn't be changed. In any case, I would suggest ghosting the .pyo files but if you don't want to then I won't insist. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 89d5f70cdfad6ed7be146dd1b548cec1 mftrace-1.1.19.tar.gz 89d5f70cdfad6ed7be146dd1b548cec1 mftrace-1.1.19.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; package has no test suite. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 19:31:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] Review Request: swh-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231931.k3NJVcK9011856@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-23 15:31 EST ------- PUBLISH +1 MD5Sums: 1d8418b85034ee9153c726c4c7188a1a swh-plugins-0.4.14.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Builds fine in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC4. Notes: * rpmlint gives the following, which are fairly self-explanatory to fix: W: swh-plugins summary-ended-with-dot A set of audio plugins for LADSPA. E: swh-plugins zero-length /usr/share/doc/swh-plugins-0.4.14/NEWS * The BuildRequirements for pkgconfig, gettext, libtool, bison, and perl-XML-Parser are unnecessary since Mock should pulls these in the minimum chroot. * Don't package the INSTALL doc, since it's the generic GNU Autotools file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 19:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] Review Request: swh-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231938.k3NJcE85012914@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-23 15:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC4. Whoops, meant to write FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 19:39:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604231939.k3NJdVRw013121@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-23 15:39 EST ------- Bad: - Use of buildroot is not consistant - Duplicate BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel (by gd-devel) - Mock build failed: checking for wish8.3... no checking for wish80... no checking for wish8.0... no checking for cygwish83... no checking for cygwish80... no configure: error: Did not find the wish executible. You need to make sure that tcl is installed on your system and that wish is in your path error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.58193 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:06:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189713] Review Request: gnubg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232006.k3NK67Np014842@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-23 16:06 EST ------- Note: This is not a formal review. 1. The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. 2. Normally, the Source should be a full url, but I'm assuming your using CVS. It should probably marked as such. 3. Your missing quite a few BuildRequires. You should use Mock to verify that your package will build correctly. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks 4. Sub-packages Requires is incorrect. It should be %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 5. The sub-packages needs %defattr(-,root,root,-) 6. Scriptlet for TexInfo is incorrect. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-117e9450bc166ceb4251bf8d87a9dd4e862442a4 That's probably more than enough stuff for you to work on for now. I would suggest fully reading the wiki, since almost all of these issues are addressed there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232018.k3NKIOGO015609@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-23 16:18 EST ------- Remember to, after creating the bugzilla entry, file a bug and make it block FE-ExcludeArch-x64 as per the review guidelines Good: - rpmlint checks clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (MPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) (but not on x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:22:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232022.k3NKMJu9015965@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 16:22 EST ------- I'm not familiar with Erlang so I thought I'd take a look, but I'm having some problems building in mock. The build likes to pause for quite some time running inet_gethost; I'm not sure what this is. I enabled parallel make and things went much faster (the failure below did not change) but if it's talking to the 'net then the build system might have a problem. The build fails: + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild install Found erlang at /usr/lib/erlang Installing esdl-0.95.0630 in /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630 mkdir /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/src mkdir /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src mkdir /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/include mkdir /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/doc mkdir /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/ebin mkdir /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/priv cp license.terms Readme* /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630 cp src/*.?rl /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/src cp c_src/*.[ch] /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src cp include/*.hrl /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/include cp doc/*.html /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/doc cp ebin/*beam /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/ebin cp priv/*.* /var/tmp/esdl-0.95.0630-2-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/priv cp: cannot stat `priv/*.*': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57229 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:27:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232027.k3NKRiKk016388@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|189309 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232028.k3NKS6Ed016413@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:28:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232028.k3NKS8ta016433@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232028.k3NKSSXS016506@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:28:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232028.k3NKSfnn016538@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|189313 | BugsThisDependsOn|189315 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:29:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232029.k3NKT0LT016568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|189313 | BugsThisDependsOn|189315 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 20:50:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232050.k3NKoYcr019126@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-23 16:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128132) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128132&action=view) patch against raptor-1.4.8 I believe this patch to be the clean fix when linking dynamically. Without it, the pkgconfig file creates RPM dependency hell. With this patch applied, liblrdf really needs only "BuildRequires: pkgconfig raptor-devel ladspa-devel" and not openssl-devel curl2-devel glib2-devel zlib-devel e2fsprogs-devel krb5-devel (and raptor-devel doesn't need them anymore either). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:11:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] New: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2- 10 years old Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/gcompris.spec Files URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/gcompris-files.tar.gz Description: GCompris / I Got IT is an educationnal game for children starting at 2. More than 100 different activities are proposed: * Click on the animals => learn the mouse/click usage * Type the falling letters => learn the keyboard usage * Falling Dices * Falling words * Basic algebra * Time learning with an analog clock * Puzzle game with famous paintings * Drive Plane to catch clouds in increasing number * Balance the scales * And much more ... Some activities make use of sounds. For those you'll have to install the gcompris-sound package for the languages you intend to use. --- First of all sorry, no SRPM the upstream sources are way too large for my sucky ISP provided homepage. You can get the upstream tarball from: http://sf.net/projects/gcompris And then the files section. All other needed SOURCES files are in gcompris-files.tar.gz, just untar this in your SOURCES dir and drop the main tarball in your SOURCES dir and you're good to go. Notice that part of gcompris (1 activity) needs gnucap, which I've packaged too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 Last some small know issues, which I've also reported upstream: 1) If you switch the language to dutch and then start gcompris from a cmdline the following messages appear: parser error : EntityRef: expecting ';' parser error : EntityRef: expecting ';' These are libxml messages, things work fine though. 2) If you don't have any (valid) alphabet sounds and try to run the letter-click (click the letter you hear) board a message is shown saying that you need to install some alphabet sounds, it is however possible to still start and play the game behind the message box by clicking the letters. Also it is possible to exit to the main menu by pressing the home icon, the message box stays in place then , but its drawn over the home menu instead of over the letter click board. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:14:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232114.k3NLEicR020927@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189699 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:15:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232115.k3NLF5HA020957@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189717 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:20:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232120.k3NLKeMI021405@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-23 17:20 EST ------- Mike, Thanks for the review! I've not imported this sofar, because the fact that debian has the other alogg packaged worries me, this means that the other one is used by some free software too, so sooner or later we will need to package it too. I think I'll just start packaging the other one right away so that I can find any conflicts now and come up with a resolution, before a bunch of packages depends on one or the other. Once I've got a new version I'll get back to you through this BZ-ticket. This weekend all my time has been sunk into packaging gcompris, a bit of a !#$% to package but well worth it if you feel like doing an interesting review take a look at bug 189717 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:24:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232124.k3NLOhbd021685@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-23 17:24 EST ------- Note that I've finished packaging gcompris see bug 189717 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232128.k3NLS5v7021956@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 17:27 EST ------- A few quick comments: Referencing %{_datadir}/locale/ in %files is forbidden; you should BuildRequires: gettext and use %find_lang. I'm not sure why RPM would fail to strip your shared libraries; brp-strip-shared looks like it will plow through everything in the buildroot for anything that file calls a "shared object". In addition, I'm concerned that stripping manually might break the -debuginfo package. Is it worth adding a desktop file for .ly files? Be aware that Fedora development has vim 7 which stores its data in /usr/share/vim/vim70e. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232135.k3NLZQiC023101@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-23 17:35 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: anjuta-gdl one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: anjuta-gdl one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig W: anjuta-gdl-debuginfo objdump-failed E: anjuta-gdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gdl-0.6.0/gdl/gdl-recent.h E: anjuta-gdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gdl-0.6.0/gdl/gdl-recent.c E: anjuta-gdl-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: anjuta-gdl-devel no-documentation None of these are blockers. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled by %find_lang - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 21:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232136.k3NLa0YX023271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 22:11:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232211.k3NMBHRI025883@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 18:11 EST ------- I took a quick look and things do look pretty good. I have a couple of suggestions: Remove the Provides: filter stuff if you didn't want to actually filter anything. Unless somehow you actually need to filter out perl(unwanted_provide). Package the documentation files (QUICKSTART, README, UPGRADING*) as %doc instead of putting them in the web directory. Don't package the requires and provides filters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 22:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232235.k3NMZHNB028207@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 22:35:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232235.k3NMZonN028319@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 Bug 182320 depends on bug 182319, which changed state. Bug 182319 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 22:41:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232241.k3NMf0pl029050@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-23 18:40 EST ------- There have been missing buildrequires. The fixed package is at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 23:16:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189724] New: Review Request: libflaim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189724 Summary: Review Request: libflaim Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/iFolder3/libflaim.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/iFolder3/libflaim-4.8.61-1.src.rpm Description: FLAIM is an embeddable cross-platform database engine that provides a rich, powerful, easy-to-use feature set. It is the database engine used by Novell eDirectory. It has proven to be highly scalable, reliable, and robust. It is available on a wide variety of 32 bit and 64 bit platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 23:21:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189725] New: Review Request: ifolder3-server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189725 Summary: Review Request: ifolder3-server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/iFolder3/ifolder3-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/iFolder3/ifolder3-server-3.5.6108.1-1.src.rpm Description: The iFolder-server provides a server for Personal Backup, File access any time and any where, and document based collaboration. iFolder allows users to create iFolders on their client machines and sync the contents of those files to the server as a backup. iFolders can also be shared with other iFolder users defined in the server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 23:27:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189725] Review Request: ifolder3-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604232327.k3NNRCcO032484@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ifolder3-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189725 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ifolder3- |Review Request: ifolder3- |server |server ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-04-23 19:27 EST ------- argh.. I forgot to add some needed files to this, please do not review at this stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 23 23:56:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] New: Review Request: Scribes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 Summary: Review Request: Scribes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes.spec SRPM URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes-0.2.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: Scribes is a simple and sleek text editor for the the GNOME desktop. It focuses on keeping the working environment free from distractions, and providing strong automation of mundane, repetitive tasks. Through this simplicity, Scribes is very powerful. Its many features include: * A dynamic templating system (called Snippets), * Automatic completion of indentifiers and bracketing, * Automatic indentation and file saving, * Bookmarks, * Drag-and-drop functionality, * Full support for Unicode (UTF-8) text (and many other encodings), * Syntax highlighting for over 30 programming languages, * Powerful GNOME integration * Translations into several different languages, ...and more are in development! rpmlint complains about two zero-length files: /usr/share/gnome/help/scribes/C/figures/scribes_status.png and /usr/share/gnome/help/scribes/C/figures/scribes_editing.png. However, this is as it is packaged, and I'm going to talk to Mystileef (its developer) if he's on IRC later about this. Otherwise, this seems harmless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 00:08:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185288] Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240008.k3O08NAX003725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libchmxx - C++ bindings for chmlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185288 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-23 20:08 EST ------- Built in devel, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 01:42:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240142.k3O1gCoo013006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-23 21:41 EST ------- OK, it builds now. Still no parallel make, although it doesn't seem to hurt anything when I enable it. rpmlint complains about all of the .h and .c files from the c_src directory. I don't know much about Erlang but I doubt these are needed at runtime. Can they be shifted out to a -devel package without breaking things? rpmlint also complains about the lack of a changelog entry for your last changes. Finally, since this is an Erlang package (perhaps the first in Extras), might we consider avoiding some of the mess that Python is in and adopt a reasonable Perl-like naming convention like erlang-SDL or erlang-esdl? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 03:04:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240304.k3O34lan023478@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-04-23 23:04 EST ------- builds on FC5, but rpmlint is not overly happy.. W: xsp incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.13-1 1.1.13-2 E: xsp no-binary E: xsp only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/2.0/asp-state2.exe.config W: xsp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/xsp-2.pc E: xsp standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/2.0/dbsessmgr2.exe.config E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/1.0/asp-state.exe.config W: xsp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/xsp.pc E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/1.0/dbsessmgr.exe.config W: xsp one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: xsp one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 03:08:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240308.k3O38ikj024334@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael at knox.net.nz ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-04-23 23:08 EST ------- Builds on FC5, rpmlint complains a little: W: mod_mono conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/httpd/conf/mod_mono.conf W: mod_mono one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: mod_mono one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig Also, the config file should be in /etc/httpd/conf.d/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 03:13:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240313.k3O3Dwum025488@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-23 23:13 EST ------- > If you could make a patch, I will make a subpackage for openal. Ok, I'll open another bug for that. > > Please build it for FE4 too. :-) > I suppose this will need xorg-x11-devel instead of the modular deps... Thanks for the FE4 build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 04:43:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240443.k3O4hKQ0003412@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-24 00:43 EST ------- I opened bug 189735 for OpenAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 05:02:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 01:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240502.k3O52hgi004955@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-24 01:02 EST ------- I've had contact with upstream and the 2 small known issues have been fixed upstream, I'll see if its easy to backport the fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 06:26:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240626.k3O6QPDb012821@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-24 02:26 EST ------- Those are all fine - it's how mono does things (everything goes into _libdir with symlinks to _bindir) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 06:28:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240628.k3O6StbK013346@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-24 02:28 EST ------- The conf file should be in conf.d - good catch, thanks. The others are warnings - not too concerned over them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 07:06:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 03:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240706.k3O760Ws018616@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-04-24 03:05 EST ------- Should the config files not be executable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 09:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189374] Re-Review Request: jed: an editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604240924.k3O9OCaI011949@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189374 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-24 05:24 EST ------- From man jed: | FILES | JED_ROOT/lib/*.sl | these are the default runtime jed slang files | JED_ROOT/lib/site.sl | This is the default startup file. Here JED_ROOT could be substituted with the expanded %{_datadir}/jed since the value of $JED_ROOT is not explained in the manual page. | /etc/jed.rc | The system wide configuration file. | ~/.jedrc | Per user configuration file. Can you get the system wide configuration file to work? I believe this has never worked before in Red Hat Linux and later (with a corresponding ticket in bugzilla). Steps to reproduce: $ sudo cp /usr/share/jed/lib/jed.conf /etc/jed.rc $ rm -f $HOME/.jedrc $ jed gives different results compared with $ sudo rm /etc/jed.rc $ cp -f /usr/share/jed/lib/jed.conf $HOME/.jedrc $ jed because the system wide file from /etc/jed.rc is not loaded at all. The code loads 'Default_Jedrc_Startup_File' = $JED_ROOT/lib/jed.rc. Copying jed.conf (not jed.rc) as the new system wide default should give a different (blue) theme. It doesn't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 10:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241032.k3OAWK7C024409@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #126894|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-24 06:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128141) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128141&action=view) initng 0.6.1-1 spec file Until told otherwise I'll just keep on working. Now initng has completely moved over to using cmake, which means it builds a lot faster. I think everything Enrico pointed out in #227 is fixed now. I decided that for the selinux stuff it would be better to look at libselinux version than FC version, right? I'm no expert at awk, anyone else might want to check if the awk statement (in %build) can be done better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 10:33:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241033.k3OAXne3024925@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #127695|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-24 06:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128142) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128142&action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1-1 spec file ...and the corresponding ifiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 10:43:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180300] Review Request: ccrtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241043.k3OAh070027473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccrtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180300 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |openvpn ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-24 06:42 EST ------- Package is upgraded to 1.3.7, which fixes the x86_64 build issue. Updated files at http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/ccrtp/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 10:45:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187235] Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241045.k3OAjIKn027928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187235 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Component|Package Review |openvpn ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-24 06:45 EST ------- Thx. Package has been imported into cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:03:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241103.k3OB33xY031057@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-04-24 07:02 EST ------- mISDN doesn't need a kernel patch -- you only need to build its modules. I did look at building mISDN as a separate package, but in the end I believe I decided it was probably better to build it as part of the Asterisk package and just ship it with the chan_misdn module. I don't think it's worth shipping separate mISDN and mISDN-devel packages just for Asterisk to use. I don't recall where the original specfile came from, but the one I find lying around unfinished in my working tree is now at http://david.woodhou.se/asterisk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241108.k3OB8Ze6031903@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-24 07:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=128132) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128132&action=view) [edit] > patch against raptor-1.4.8 > > I believe this patch to be the clean fix when linking dynamically. Thanks. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/raptor.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/raptor-1.4.8-4.src.rpm I've updated liblrdf based on this as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:10:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241110.k3OBALpQ032224@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-24 07:10 EST ------- I've cleaned up the spec file based raptor changes. Updated bits here... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblrdf-0.4.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] Review Request: swh-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241119.k3OBJTJ9001191@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-24 07:19 EST ------- Thanks for looking at this. (In reply to comment #2) > * rpmlint gives the following, which are fairly self-explanatory to fix: > W: swh-plugins summary-ended-with-dot A set of audio plugins for LADSPA. > E: swh-plugins zero-length /usr/share/doc/swh-plugins-0.4.14/NEWS Fixed. > * The BuildRequirements for pkgconfig, gettext, libtool, bison, and > perl-XML-Parser are unnecessary since Mock should pulls these in the minimum > chroot. Ok, I've removed these. But shouldn't the Exceptions section of the packaging guidelines mention these packages as well? > * Don't package the INSTALL doc, since it's the generic GNU Autotools file. Right. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/swh-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/swh-plugins-0.4.14-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:25:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241125.k3OBPbO9002480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-24 07:25 EST ------- I managed to contact the author through the email (eds.com) I found in this post http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/69402. The answer was that the license was the same as perl. He also replied and closed the RT ticket I had on the subject: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=14563. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:31:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241131.k3OBVsQZ003319@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-24 07:31 EST ------- http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.13-2.src.rpm Changelog: * Mon Apr 24 2006 Jose Pedro Oliveira - 1.13-2 - The license is: GPL or Artistic. License information: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=14563. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:48:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241148.k3OBmIgY006297@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi, | |tagoh at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-24 07:48 EST ------- IMHO we should move to a policy of all elisp packages being named emacs-. This is in line with the naming for libraries of other interpreted languages like python, perl and I'm planning to follow this for ghc (Haskell) libraries too. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-e865dfbf5ffb4156a1bdf299ace96f48af903a7a Probably xemacs-, etc is a good convention for XEmacs packages. Traditionally we suffixed with -xemacs in Core, and hence the naming of the elisp packages in Extras that formerly were part of Core. Ideally those packages should be renamed to follow the naming policy if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 11:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241151.k3OBp6eb006769@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-04-24 07:51 EST ------- Upgrade to the latest SVN (Negotiate/krb5 should work now too). New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.spec New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind-20060423-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 12:00:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241200.k3OC0q6Z008366@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2006-04-24 08:00 EST ------- Fixed in: http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/spec/nss-mdns.spec http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/source/nss-mdns-0.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 12:18:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241218.k3OCIQ0C010925@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 andy at diginode.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andy at diginode.net ------- Additional Comments From andy at diginode.net 2006-04-24 08:18 EST ------- zaptel-ztdummy-250hz.diff.txt:37 +if ((HZ != 1000) || (HZ != 250)) { + printk("ztdummy: This module requires the kernel HZ setting to be 1000 or 250 ticks per second\n"); return -ENODEV; There is a logic problem with that. It should either be - !((HZ = 1000) || (HZ = 250)) or (HZ != 1000) && (HZ != 250) Otherwise, without the RTC, the ztdummy module will not load as it will act exactly the opposite of what it was intended to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 12:18:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241218.k3OCImkk011019@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-04-24 08:18 EST ------- * I think, the old vs. recent SELinux API check should be implemented in the upstream package (I do not know, whether cmake is powerful enough for that). Else, I would not use 'rpm -q ...' but check the required feature. E.g. with | grep -q only-in-old-api /usr/include/selinux/selinux.h && API=OLD || API= | cmake . -D${API}SELINUX:BOOL=ON ... But I really do not know for what the OLDSELINUX/SELINUX flag is used and can not tell the exact string for 'only-in-old-api'. * there should be appended a '|| :' to the | /usr/sbin/semanage ... | /sbin/restorecon ... calls in %post and %postun, and perhaps '2>/dev/null' too. 'semanage' is not available for FC4. * %postun is buggy; '/sbin/ldconfig' must be moved into the body: | %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig | /usr/sbin/semanage ... * just a minor tweak: use | %install | rm -rf %{buildroot} _doc ~~~~ * the | %post | ... | exit 0 is useless; either %post reached the 'exit 0'; then the last command succeeded with exit code '0' and the complete script will exit with 0. Or, a command failed; then the complete script will abort immediately without seeing the 'exit 0'. * not really wrong, but the '-r' flag can/should be omitted: | %install | ... | rm -rf %{buildroot}/sbin/killall5 Else: * when you want a full review, then provide a complete .src.rpm. * how mature is the i-files syntax? When scripts will have to be rewritten for e.g. 0.70, this will stop me from approving it... Resp.: when published now, can you guarantee, that a) package follows upstream releases, and b) a nightly 'smart update' to a new version will not bring the system into an unusable state? * when attaching spec files to the ticket, a 'text/plain' type shall be assigned instead of 'application/octet-stream' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 12:23:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241223.k3OCNibL011609@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-24 08:23 EST ------- Hi Jens - this is what I have tried to do. However, the BIG problem is that the emacs- and xemacs- packages are inevitably built from the same spec and tarball, which has a different name (no prefix), and so the module name is different. Joe User then has a problem with emacs-foo, but then can't find emacs-foo in bugzilla, because the module is called foo. We can't rename the module to emacs-foo because then Joe has a problem with xemacs-foo and still can't find the right module. We can't rename the module xemacs-foo, because Joe has a problem with xemacs-foo. etc. etc. In short, what you propose (and what I've tried to do) isn't possible because the same source provides extensions for *two* "interpreters" (emacs and xemacs) and hence there is a naming conflict. Worse, emacs is in core, xemacs is now in extras. To achieve what you propose would in the end require having *two* modules in core, two spec files, and twice the work :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 12:26:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241226.k3OCQZDR012150@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From andy at diginode.net 2006-04-24 08:26 EST ------- Sorry, a correction. The condition will fail for any value of HZ and prevent the module from being loaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 13:03:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] New: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: tkmame at retrogames.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pypoker-eval.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pypoker-eval-131.0-2.src.rpm ** NOTE ** You may have to download the srpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ Description: This package is python adaptor for the poker-eval toolkit for writing programs which simulate or analyze poker games. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 13:30:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241330.k3ODUjet025996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |aalib ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-04-24 09:30 EST ------- Updated package: SRPM Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack- audio-connection-kit-0.101.1-2.src.rpm Spec Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack- audio-connection-kit.spec * Mon Apr 24 2006 Andy Shevchenko - disable oss and portaudio engines - use /dev/shm as jack tmpdir - remove capabilities stuff Due to English isn't my native language could anybody help me with README. Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 13:33:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241333.k3ODXJjP026779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|aalib |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 13:45:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241345.k3ODjqe3029405@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-24 09:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > OK, it builds now. Still no parallel make, although it doesn't seem to hurt > anything when I enable it. added %{?_smp_mflags} > rpmlint complains about all of the .h and .c files from the c_src directory. I > don't know much about Erlang but I doubt these are needed at runtime. Can they > be shifted out to a -devel package without breaking things? I split off a devel package. There is now an problem report by rpmlint indicating that there are only non-binaries in /usr/lib in esdl-devel. This should be ignored. > Finally, since this is an Erlang package (perhaps the first in Extras), might we > consider avoiding some of the mess that Python is in and adopt a reasonable > Perl-like naming convention like erlang-SDL or erlang-esdl? This might be worth considering. However, AFAIK, other distributions don't do it, so it would possibly create some confusion. Package at the usual place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:05:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] Review Request: swh-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241405.k3OE5cMY032487@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-24 10:05 EST ------- No need to post the revised spec & srpm. I already changed the status of this to FE-ACCEPT, since most of the changes were minor and could be fixed when you imported this into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241411.k3OEBg5u000997@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-24 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > Is 1.13-2 acceptable in its current form, or should I not remove the execute > bits? > > > > You could leave the exec bits on. The extra dependencies you get as a result of > > this are: > > > > * /usr/bin/perl > > * perl(Curses) > > * perl(ExtUtils::testlib) > > > > perl(Curses) is provided by the package itself, and the other two are provided > > by the main perl package, which is already a dependency of this package. So > > there aren't any new dependencies introduced by leaving the exec bits on. > > 1) IIRC there are plans to disallowed this in the future (no docs with execution > permissions). Even rpmlint already warns about requirements being pulled in by > doc files: > > W: perl-Curses doc-file-dependency ... > > 2) Right now the only way to avoid the requirements pulled in by perl modules > (.pm files) shipped as doc is to filter them out. My point was that although there are "logically" additional deps from having the executable deps, in practice there are in fact no additional deps *in this case* because the same packages that satisfy the main deps also satisfy the "doc" deps. Of course that could change if some modules were split out from the main perl package. If at some time in the future rpm doesn't allow executable docs, that's also fine by me, as is this package, with or without the executable docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:18:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241418.k3OEIjDI002512@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2006-04-24 10:18 EST ------- One of the requirements to get this included from Ulrich was that lookups are never done directly by the nss-mdns plugin, and only through avahi where it would be cached. I posted a patch for that to Lennart, as well as support for links to generate the text documentation. I would need to update the package when a new version of nss-mdns is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241419.k3OEJRII002624@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-04-24 10:19 EST ------- Finally I had some time again, so here they are: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls.spec http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls-1.5.0-5.src.rpm I put in all Wart's changes and moved the libtls so into the tls1.5 subdir. I hope I got it right now, Sander -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:28:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241428.k3OESoGQ004940@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-04-24 10:28 EST ------- > it compiles and passes 'make check' on my fc3 system Yep, all is OK now on FC3 But on FC5: CXXFLAGS="-O2": coredump CXXFLAGS="-O1": "1 of 7 tests failed" CXX="g++32": "1 of 7 tests failed" It seems that gcc-4.x is not yet supported well, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241429.k3OETrCM005175@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-24 10:29 EST ------- I believe the aim is to maintain consistency within Fedora even if it means we use different package names than other distributions. The package naming guidelines are pretty clear about what addon packages should be named, and I think this qualifies as an addon package. "esdl" just gives no reasonable indication that this is an Erlang package. I'm not trying to be a pain; perhaps someone else could weigh in with their opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:34:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188429] Review Request: glib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241434.k3OEYhuC006435@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188429 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-04-24 10:34 EST ------- Thanks, imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 14:35:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241435.k3OEZAgS006553@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 Bug 188430 depends on bug 188429, which changed state. Bug 188429 Summary: Review Request: glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188429 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:01:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241501.k3OF10JU012660@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-24 11:00 EST ------- Ok, I renamed the package, but I also included a "Provides: esdl". http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/erlang-esdl-0.95.0630-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:07:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] Review Request: swh-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241507.k3OF7eRH013692@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-24 11:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > No need to post the revised spec & srpm. Ok. Thanks for your quick response. I've imported this package and requested an FC-5 branch. I'll close this with NEXTRELEASE now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:13:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167983] Review Request: evolution-caldav In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241513.k3OFDBYC014533@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-caldav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167983 dmalcolm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2006-04-24 11:13 EST ------- By the time FC5 landed, evolution-data-server-1.6 gained a caldav backend, and evolution-2.6 gained the necessary UI hooks to work with it, so this package is only really of interest for evolution 2.4. IIRC this version was only in Fedora during the first part of the FC5 development cycle (FC4 had 2.2), so I think this separate package is not particularly useful anymore, unless someone wants to run 2.4, and run it with caldav support. If anyone wants to own it, please step forward, but for now I'm going to close this as WONTFIX (feel free to reopen if you think my analysis is wrong). Thanks to everyone for your help in packaging review, I'm sorry that it now appears redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:14:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177841] Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241514.k3OFEKSd014836@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages that need a sponsor Alias: FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 Bug 177841 depends on bug 167983, which changed state. Bug 167983 Summary: Review Request: evolution-caldav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167983 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:16:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241516.k3OFGr3w015316@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-24 11:16 EST ------- * Could you update the package to ghc-6.4.2? * BuildRoot must be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Is the epoch necessary for mozilla version? * I think PreReq should simply be Requires * ghclibdir should probably %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version} * Can you explain your system of versioning? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241519.k3OFJhMu016177@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-04-24 11:19 EST ------- No it wouldn't. There is no real problem for a single source RPM of any name to spit out binary packages of any names. I think we need to be promoting consistency in package namespaces. I propose that we bring this to the next Fedora Extras Steering comittee meeting for discussion. Meanwhile if anyone else has opinions please speak up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:41:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] New: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jima at auroralinux.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.spec SRPM URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.30-1.src.rpm Description: Dnsmasq is lightweight, easy to configure DNS forwarder and DHCP server. It is designed to provide DNS and, optionally, DHCP, to a small network. It can serve the names of local machines which are not in the global DNS. The DHCP server integrates with the DNS server and allows machines with DHCP-allocated addresses to appear in the DNS with names configured either in each host or in a central configuration file. Dnsmasq supports static and dynamic DHCP leases and BOOTP for network booting of diskless machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:45:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241545.k3OFjqP3023135@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 andy at diginode.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andy at diginode.net ------- Additional Comments From andy at diginode.net 2006-04-24 11:45 EST ------- There is an issue with the zaptel.rules file for udev. The KERNEL= on each line has an additional = sign which causes udev not to create the /dev/zap entries. On a related note, the udev rule calls for the owner to be "asterisk", but neither this package or the asterisk package seems to be creating the user. In practice however, udev just creates the dev node (after the above is fixed) as root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 15:57:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241557.k3OFvHCa025676@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-24 11:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #239) > * I think, the old vs. recent SELinux API check should be implemented > in the upstream package (I do not know, whether cmake is powerful > enough for that). Else, I would not use 'rpm -q ...' but check the > required feature. E.g. with > > | grep -q only-in-old-api /usr/include/selinux/selinux.h && API=OLD || API= > | cmake . -D${API}SELINUX:BOOL=ON ... > > But I really do not know for what the OLDSELINUX/SELINUX flag is > used and can not tell the exact string for 'only-in-old-api'. Done in upstream svn, -DSELINUX should now work on FC4 and FC5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:14:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241614.k3OGEeNC028682@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-24 12:14 EST ------- Hi Warren - I agree, there's no real problem, technically - in fact, that's what I've done. I'm just worried from the user perspective. Perhaps I am worrying too much though, given that the user would have to install muse and emacs-muse (and/or xemacs-muse) and so should know to look for a module called muse and not emacs-muse. I would like to add though, that I think the approach used here (muse, emacs-muse, xemacs-muse from a muse srcrpm) is much more preferable to having muse muse-emacs and muse-xemacs which is what the mew model would give. Prepending the interpreter is following the current guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:15:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241615.k3OGFXRO028899@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-24 12:15 EST ------- You still need to remove '--enable-symbols' from the %configure statement so that it doesn't try to add the 'g' in -ltclstub8.4g. It would also be good, as Jochen said, to include the tests as part of the build. Just add the following to the spec file: %check make test And as noted, there are three failing tests. The first two look like they might be due to the use of a different openssl version from when the tests were written. The third should be posted upstream to see if it's a real problem or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:33:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187235] Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241633.k3OGXB99032181@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ices - icecast streaming source client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187235 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|openvpn |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:40:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241640.k3OGeAXH002155@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-04-24 12:39 EST ------- This seems acceptable. I'll add "erlang-*" to the NamingGuidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241645.k3OGjm3E003838@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-24 12:45 EST ------- OK, looking further into the mISDN issue: Do the Fedora kernels have the mISDN kernel modules? If not, it would mean that people would need to manually compile/install the mISDN kernel modules to use the mISDN channel from Asterisk, something that's bound to be error-prone. Looking at the Makefile in channels/misdn in the Asterisk source, there's a "test_preempt" target that checks the kernel config for "CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y", "CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y" and "CONFIG_SMP=y" and also checks to see if GCC v4 is installed. It claims that the mISDN channel won't work if any of these conditions are true. It would appear that for current Fedora development all four of these conditions are true, and for Fedora Core 4 kernels at least 3 of the conditions are true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:48:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241648.k3OGmtBv004823@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-24 12:48 EST ------- http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.14-1.src.rpm Log-Dispatch-FileRotate 1.14 released a couple of hours ago. The copyright section in the main pod page only mentions the Artistic license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:57:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241657.k3OGvnen006681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-24 12:57 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine. + source tar has the same md5sum as the upstream. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Requires should be: Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(post): /sbin/service Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/service - Debuginfo package contains no files. - Error message when starting services: Starting dnsmasq: dnsmasq: ISC dhcpd integration not available: set HAVE_ISC_READER in src/config.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:58:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241658.k3OGwUcN006824@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:58:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241658.k3OGwePo006871@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-24 12:58 EST ------- Tom, are you saying that the "Provides: esdl" is acceptable as well? I'm vaguely disquieted by it because it shouldn't be necessary; nothing in Extras will require it. I'll go ahead and work up a full review in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 16:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241659.k3OGxDuq007069@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 17:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241700.k3OH043O007249@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-24 12:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Tom, are you saying that the "Provides: esdl" is acceptable as well? I'm > vaguely disquieted by it because it shouldn't be necessary; nothing in Extras > will require it. You are right, I'll remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 17:01:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] New: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/e17.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/e17-0.16.999.026-1.src.rpm Description: Enlightenment is a next-generation window manager. It does not use any advanced X extensions available on some new XServers yet, as it is striving to be backwards-compatible to all XServers even on the oldest machines. It is designed to not just use new features, but to also work on small, limited processing power devices as well as the most powerful of today's desktop and server processors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 17:07:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241707.k3OH7c14008532@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-24 13:07 EST ------- Is anyone reviewing this package? I don't think so, but it's not assigned to the usual "unassigned" address. I'll pick it up later today unless someone chimes in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 17:11:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241711.k3OHBLLL009072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-24 13:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Is anyone reviewing this package? I don't think so, but it's not assigned to > the usual "unassigned" address. > > I'll pick it up later today unless someone chimes in. It's on my to-do list but I'm a bit busy today. Feel free to take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 17:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241730.k3OHUn38013037@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-04-24 13:30 EST ------- Hum, i must have messed something up because it did have that before, i had the patch ready to go: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls.spec http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls-1.5.0-6.src.rpm it is ok on my machine, now i am also trying it with mock, but that will take a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 17:44:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241744.k3OHiXp5016828@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-24 13:44 EST ------- I have a few minutes free and this is a simple package, so: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: b7cc69172d5c8b1a34c429d738bc3fa5 Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.14.tar.gz b7cc69172d5c8b1a34c429d738bc3fa5 Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.14.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is present but necessarily disabled. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 18:44:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241844.k3OIiTSK003469@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-24 14:44 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 19:05:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241905.k3OJ52Fj011115@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-24 15:04 EST ------- God: + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Source tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz is different from upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 19:06:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241906.k3OJ6A9e011505@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-24 15:06 EST ------- Skimming diffs only so far, random findings or comments: - The %if "%{?fedora}" > "4" conditionals can be dropped for a FC6+ only package - %check belongs logically after %install, especially if you insist on keeping the "|| :" in it too to support old distro versions - Does the test suite work in "headless" build environments? What about mock? - Rationale for 444 perms for /etc/gtk/gtkrc? I believe 644 would do just fine - Possibly unowned %{_datadir}/themes dir (I haven't checked the dep tree) - specfile not UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 19:21:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241921.k3OJLs6M016932@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-04-24 15:21 EST ------- ok now i have one with correct MD5SUM http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls-1.5.0-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 19:22:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241922.k3OJM8Z5017086@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-04-24 15:22 EST ------- (yes, gtk+ builds fine in mock, that's how I found out about the modular_x dependancies the hard way...) %changelog * Mon Apr 24 2006 Rex Dieter 1:1.2.10-52 - install -m644 gtkrc ... - utf-8 specfile - comment %%fedora > 4 constructs - own %%_datadir/themes - move %%check after %%install Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/gtk+-1.2.10-52.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gtk+-1.2.10-52.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 19:42:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241942.k3OJgI26025519@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-04-24 15:42 EST ------- We might want to ship the kernel modules in a separate package, yes. I believe the mqueue branch of mISDN, which is what chan_misdn should now be using, solves all the above-mentioned problems with locking and compilers. That's an issue for the kernel-modules package though; the userspace bit is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 19:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189157] Review Request: aspell-he In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604241943.k3OJhQta026161@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-he https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189157 danken at cs.technion.ac.il changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 20:01:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242001.k3OK1cf1032193@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-24 16:01 EST ------- Thanks for approval. The package should be showing up on mirrors soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 20:02:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242002.k3OK2BMt032469@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 garrick at usc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 20:05:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242005.k3OK5m6M001512@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-04-24 16:05 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing. Got some fixes for it. Spec URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.spec SRPM URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.30-2.src.rpm Also uses http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.30-fedora-extras.patch . All aforementioned issues should be resolved. Let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 20:07:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242007.k3OK7Nij002223@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-04-24 16:07 EST ------- Provides filter removed, docs split into -doc package. New packages: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla-2.20.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 20:13:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189373] Review Request: iperf -- measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242013.k3OKDVq0004549@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iperf -- measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189373 somlo at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 20:41:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] New: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jima at auroralinux.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/videodog/videodog.spec SRPM URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/videodog/videodog-0.31-1.src.rpm Description: VideoDog is a command line tool to grab frames from a Video4linux-compliant device. It can export a file in raw, PNM, or JPG formats. It can also do loop capture using multiple buffers, or just be used to set/retrieve device data or scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 21:13:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189819] New: Review Request: gtranslator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189819 Summary: Review Request: gtranslator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/gtranslator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/gtranslator-1.1.6-1.src.rpm Description: gtranslator is an enhanced gettext po file editor for the Gnome desktop environment. It handles all forms of gettext po files like compiled gettext po files (gmo/mo files), compressed po files (po.gz/po.bz2 etc.) and features many comfortable everyday usage features likeFind/Replace, Auto Translation, Message Translation Learning, Messages Table (for having an overview of the translations/messages in the po file), Easy Navigation and Editing of translation messages & comments of the translation where accurate. It has got really very much to offer therefore you should simply test it and be happy with it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 21:41:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189824] New: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824 Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com This is needed for the psttf driver for the upcoming 5.6.0 release of plplot. Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lasi.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lasi-1.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: libLASi is a library written by Larry Siden that provides a C++ stream output interface ( with operator << ) for creating Postscript documents that can contain characters from any of the scripts and symbol blocks supported in Unicode and by Owen Taylor's Pango layout engine. The library accomodates right-to-left scripts such as Arabic and Hebrew as easily as left-to-right scripts. Indic and Indic-derived Complex Text Layout (CTL) scripts, such as Devanagari, Thai, Lao, and Tibetan are supported to the extent provided by Pango and by the OpenType fonts installed on your system. All of this is provided without need for any special configuration or layout calculation on the programmer's part. Although the capability to produce Unicode-based multilingual Postscript documents exists in large Open Source application framework libraries such as GTK+, QT, and KDE, libLASi was designed for projects which require the ability to produce Postscript independent of any one application framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 21:43:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189819] Review Request: gtranslator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242143.k3OLhiQM000977@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtranslator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189819 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-24 17:43 EST ------- Already in FE: $ yum info gtranslator [...] Name : gtranslator Arch : x86_64 Version: 1.1.6 Release: 3.fc5 Size : 581 k Repo : extras Summary: Gettext po file editor for GNOME Description: gtranslator is an enhanced gettext po file editor for the GNOME desktop environment. It handles all forms of gettext po files and features many comfortable everyday usage features like find and replace functions, auto translation, and translation learning, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 21:54:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242154.k3OLsneG003733@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-24 17:54 EST ------- This iteration uses a custom group for each of hack, sail, and phantasia to alleviate some of the potential security issues arising from running setgid. This is in lieu of having them drop setgid early. The custom groups are created with fedora-groupadd and have been registered on the wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UserRegistry http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games-2.17-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 22:01:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187799] Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242201.k3OM15kC005214@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187799 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-24 18:00 EST ------- No clarification has been forthcoming, so I'll just make an executive decision to follow existing practise from Core (even though I know core stuff hasn't undergone the strict review that Extras packages have). In any case, it would be dumb to make a -devel package for two header files that are used internally to Perl. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 22:06:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189827] New: Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189827 Summary: Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: garrick at usc.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-PBS.spec SRPM URL: http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~garrick/perl-PBS-0.31-1.src.rpm Description: This is a Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library (as from TORQUE or OpenPBS). This allows you to stat the server, nodes, or jobs, submit jobs, alter jobs, etc. Specifically, the ifl, rpp, and rm APIs are implemented here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 22:29:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189830] New: Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189830 Summary: Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/xmms-scrobbler/xmms-scrobbler.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/xmms-scrobbler/xmms-scrobbler-0.3.6-1.src.rpm Description: This is an audioscrobbler xmms plugin. Audioscrobbler will send the name of every song you play on your computer to Last.fm. This effortlessly populates your profile to play radio you like and make personalised recommendations! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 23:01:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242301.k3ON1ETS016657@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 23:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242302.k3ON2KVw016900@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-24 19:02 EST ------- This latest rpm works great with tclhttpd. I can verify that this package is functional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 23:02:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242302.k3ON2hGa017024@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |andreas at bawue.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 24 23:31:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604242331.k3ONVJxU022165@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-24 19:31 EST ------- Can we ponder the bytecompiling at the install time before doing this? - Does someone wants to spam bugs when one imports a flavor of emacsen like emacs22, SXEmacs etc etc, and all elisp packages needs to be reworked then? It sounds like the unnecessary work to me. changing the package name to emacs- should be still valid idea though, I suspect that we don't need an extra work to add subpackages for a flavor of emacsen at all. Could someone explain me the significant reason why we have to provide the bytecompiled packages for each flavor of emacsen rather than bytecompiling at the install time? - We didn't just need to care of others when we didn't work the community together, because we didn't have any plans to ship other emacsen any more. but now, we have a chance to do it. current approach isn't comfortable to do it and it imposes a burden on all elisp maintainers. I'd propose this again. TIA, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 02:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250210.k3P2ATxb019280@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-24 22:10 EST ------- What if I install emacs, then some packages, then xemacs? Some thought needs to do into how this would work. Triggers? The base package for each emacs flavor could byte-compile everything in sight when it is installed and then each subpackage could compile itself for each installed emaacs flavor. But those packages would have to %ghost a lot of files so they properly uninstall all of the compiled versions that they might not even know about. And the issue of compatibility between packages and the various emacs flavors would make things terribly complicated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 02:14:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250214.k3P2E5ou020165@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-24 22:13 EST ------- *GOOD* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest ([WWW] http://www.ioccc.org/). MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. *NEEDSWORK* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. *Notes* Please do not use the freshmeat.net urls. URL: should be http://paginas.terra.com.br/informatica/gleicon/video4linux/videodog.html while Source0: should be http://paginas.terra.com.br/informatica/gleicon/video4linux/videodog%{version}.tar.gz Otherwise the package looks fine, change this, and you can consider the package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 02:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250254.k3P2sEFf031718@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-04-24 22:54 EST ------- Thanks for the review. The URLs have been changed in 0.31-2; I'll probably import the package into CVS tomorrow. I knew something was fishy about those freshmeat.net URLs... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 03:12:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250312.k3P3Cm7e003535@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-24 23:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > We might want to ship the kernel modules in a separate package, yes. I believe > the mqueue branch of mISDN, which is what chan_misdn should now be using, solves > all the above-mentioned problems with locking and compilers. That's an issue for > the kernel-modules package though; the userspace bit is fine. chan_misdn in 1.2 seems to require a specific version of the mISDN libraries that is almost a year old now. chan_misdn in SVN trunk seems to want a newer mISDN library version. It makes sense to me to worry about supporting mISDN after Asterisk 1.4 is release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 03:14:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250314.k3P3E0VY003928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-24 23:13 EST ------- If we use the same things what Debian does, we don't rely on the trigger at all, which may mess up ;) For the reference, http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/debian-emacs-policy especially see section 6. emacsen-common provides a facility to do byte-compile for every flavor of emacsen. What the elisp packages needs to do is, just to call emacs-package-install/emacs-package-remove in %post/%postun. and emacs-install/emacs-remove is for emacsen itself and to byte-compile all elisp available on system. it's useful when additional emacsen is installed on system and noone needs to install another package to use on it nor noone even needs to build another subpackage for that. So I don't think any packages need to do %ghost. packagers just needs to prepare the install/remove script and put it under /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/{install,remove}/, also just include all necessary elisp packages in rpm. that's it. you will miss the feature that queries the byte-compiled elisp files to rpm to know which package owns it though, I don't think it's an issue. For the compatibility, you can just exclude the incompatible flavor of emacsen in install script. Debian packages ordinarily does it as needed. HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 03:20:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188997] Review Request: magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250320.k3P3KP9N005444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188997 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-04-24 23:20 EST ------- I started to review this package, however, it seems to error all the time.. examples: On start: error in slave eval: couldn't load file "/usr/lib/magic/tcl/tclmagic.so": /usr/lib/magic/tcl/tclmagic.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory When exiting by using the "x" in the corner: Error: invaild command name "magic::quit" invalid command name "magic::quit" invalid command name "magic::quit" while executing "magic::quit" ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel #0 magic::quit" invoked from within "interp eval $slave uplevel \#0 $args" (procedure "::tkcon::InterpEval" line 10) invoked from within "::tkcon::Slave slave magic::quit" ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel \#0 $new $args" ("default" arm line 5) invoked from within "switch -glob -- $cmd { buf* { ## 'buffer' Sets/Query the buffer size if {[llength $args]} { if {[regexp {^[1-9][0-9]*$} $args]} { s..." (procedure "tkcon" line 4) invoked from within "tkcon slave slave magic::quit" (command for "WM_DELETE_WINDOW" window manager protocol) I am not sure whats wrong, but the srpm as is does not seem to be happy with FC5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 03:27:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250327.k3P3RNRt007015@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 04:20:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250420.k3P4KGrH021041@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188268 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 04:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250443.k3P4hx9G028305@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-25 00:43 EST ------- Not building on devel x86_64: + cd dynlibs + make MOSMLHOME=/var/tmp/mosml-2.01-5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/mosml cd intinf; make make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mosml/src/dynlibs/intinf' gcc -Dunix -O2 -fno-defer-pop -I/var/tmp/mosml-2.01-5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/mosml/include -c -o intinf.o intinf.c intinf.c: In function 'largeint_get_str': intinf.c:319: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'malloc' ld -shared -o libmgmp.so intinf.o /usr/lib/libgmp.a ld: intinf.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `first_atoms' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC intinf.o: could not read symbols: Bad value make[1]: *** [libmgmp.so] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 04:44:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250444.k3P4ilYd028480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-04-25 00:44 EST ------- rpmlint output [monkey at localhost i386]$ rpmlint e17-0.16.999.026-1.i386.rpm E: e17 setuid-binary /usr/lib/enlightenment/modules/cpufreq/linux-gnu-i686/freqset root 04555 E: e17 non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/enlightenment/modules/cpufreq/linux-gnu-i686/freqset 04555 [monkey at localhost i386]$ rpmlint e17-devel-0.16.999.026-1.i386.rpm W: e17-devel no-documentation spec looks good, builds OK on FC5. md5sum is happy would be nice to have the menus sync with Gnome, but that aside, e17 works as expected. If you can confirm the output of rpmlint is OK, then I can approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 05:33:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250533.k3P5Xbw6008496@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ville.skytta at iki.fi | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-25 01:33 EST ------- (Removing myself from Cc, three mails of every change here is a bit much...) FWIW, I'm not a fan of the byte-compile-in-%post idea. For example: no other packages (eg. python) do that either, it will cause problems with %{_netsharedpath} and read-only /usr/share mounts, and local *Emacs configurations may affect the byte-compilation possibly resulting in hard to debug issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 05:44:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250544.k3P5iGBN011549@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-25 01:44 EST ------- If the groups are seen as a good idea and are going to stay: why do these games need statically assigned GIDs, and plain groupadd without -g is not enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 06:48:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250648.k3P6mwq1027490@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-25 02:48 EST ------- Are there any yet-another python implementation? someone may still wants to use older release of python though, it sounds to me like it's a little different case, and even if someone does support byte-compiling installation for python, it may be less worth efforts. For %{_netsharedpath} and read-only /usr/share mounts, it could just stops to do byte-compiling if installation path is included in %{_netsharedpath} since rpm won't do anything. so it should be general issue but not specific issue. or can you explain me much more details that is likely case? Also, you will have to do byte-compile with --no-init-file --no-site-file, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 07:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 90133] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250753.k3P7rmX3014098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90133 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 08:10:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250810.k3P8Amv0019089@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-25 04:10 EST ------- I've updated both the spec file ant he -files.tar.gz with a -2 version, this fixes issue 1) unfortunatly upstreams fix for issue 2) was not correct / did not fix the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 09:34:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250934.k3P9YFRw011155@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-25 05:34 EST ------- Byte compiling in %post is an interesting idea, but I think it doesn't really survive a cost-benefit analysis. Getting the infrastructure right for that would be a big job. Plus, if I understand correctly, we may miss build fails and start shipping broken packages, since I suspect the build system won't detect byte compilation fails, since it builds, but doesn't install the package. One could imagine installing a new emacsen package, which would trigger byte compiling of a number of installed packages which, since the elisp api isn't stable, could break. Messy. Or do I have the wrong end of the stick? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 09:53:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604250953.k3P9rk7N016485@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-25 05:53 EST ------- it may be a little higher cost, right. so we could just borrow emacsen-common package from Debian, which is working well. For detecting fails at the build time, don't you do any testing when you put newer package? as one sometimes wrongly put a broken package that just passed compiler-wise false detection, putting packages without testing is always dangerous. you could still find any issues more with self-installation testing before pushing packages into the build queue. Well, if the elisp api isn't stable, problems should appears with/without add-on elisp, even with/without this idea. then that flavor of emacsen itself will be broken. it's irrelevant to this idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 10:33:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251033.k3PAXFQN027962@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-25 06:33 EST ------- Of course I test building of the packages using mock. However, I can't test *installation* on all platforms, as I simply don't have access to them all. What you're proposing relies upon elisp compilation at install time, not package build time. Mock goes a long way to testing package building, but not package installation. The elisp api is well understood to be inconsistent between flavours, and unstable between versions within a flavour. This isn't a problem, as packages get updated as the api changes. But, your proposal would have packages automatically triggered to be byte compiled for all emacs versions as they're installed, irrespective of whether the package has been updated for the relevant api... this will inevitably lead to broken packages installed on users machines, UNLESS there is a way to control what versions of emacs the package is byte compiled for on installation/triggering. That may be possible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 11:52:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251152.k3PBqpID016523@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-25 07:52 EST ------- Well, I'm not blaming you on your packaging process. I'm sorry if you feel that way. I mean you could just package your elisp as noarch package, and there shouldn't be any different between architectures. if that's a problem, possibly it should appears at the build time for a flavor of that emacsen. so I suppose you can assume that the installation on all archs should be ok if you can install your elisp successfully on your box. or is this wrong assumption? Well, I'm not sure if I understood correctly your comment on elisp api though, for instance, if your package, foo is updated, emacsen-common is just going to byte-compile foo only, or another one if your install script invokes one - actually in Debian, apel install script invokes flim install script so that it depends on flim and sometimes broke without re-byte-compiling it, but anyway - for all flavors of emacsen since the byte-compiled elisp files for foo is out-of-date. and if only xemacs package is updated, emacsen-common is going to remove all byte-compiled files for xemacs and byte-compile all elisp packages for xemacs again. it won't touch other flavors of emacsen. so I'm not sure what's "irrespective". for good example above apel install script, here is quote: # recompile flim pkg=flim if [ -d /usr/share/${FLAVOR}/site-lisp/${pkg} ]; then if [ -f /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/${pkg} ]: then /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/remove/${pkg} ${FLAVOR} /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/${pkg} ${FLAVOR} fi fi Those is what described in apel install script that put as /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/apel on the debian box. and ${FLAVOR} is to know which flavors of emacsen - including versions of emacsen - such as emacs21 and xemacs21 install script is going to be invoked for. Is it clear? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 11:58:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251158.k3PBwAPq018442@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-25 07:57 EST ------- doh, *flim* depends on apel. well, if this is the case, only the way without harcode like this is, to rely on %trigger. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 12:26:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251226.k3PCQRIR026482@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-25 08:26 EST ------- Also emacsen-common is going to re-byte-compile apel if flim is updated or installed, in above case, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 12:56:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251256.k3PCuMVJ003384@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-04-25 08:56 EST ------- new specfile and srpm: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/amsn.spec http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/amsn-0.96-0.4.20060425cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 13:20:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251320.k3PDKBDZ011643@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2006-04-25 09:19 EST ------- So it's consistant across systems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 13:46:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189874] New: Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189874 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-SubCalls.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-SubCalls-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: There are a number of different situations (like testing cacheing code) where you want to want to do a number of tests, and then verify that some underlying subroutine deep within the code was called a specific number of times. Notes: 1 - Targets: FE5 and devel (due to Test::* version requirements) 2 - Last requirement for http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPI/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 13:52:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189877] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Locate - Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189877 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Locate - Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Module-Locate.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Module-Locate-1.7-1.src.rpm Description: Using "locate()", return the path that "require" would find for a given module or filename (it can also return a filehandle if a reference in @INC has been used). This means you can test for the existence, or find the path for, modules without having to evaluate the code they contain. This module also comes with accompanying utility functions that are used within the module itself (except for "get_source") and are available for import. Note: According to the new maintainer of pmtools this module will be a requirement of pmtools 1.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 14:05:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251405.k3PE58AK028504@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-25 10:04 EST ------- sorry, but the tar.gz file in the source RPM doesn't match with the upstream version. fedora-qa tcltls-1.5.0-7.src.rpm Starting QA for local srpm tcltls-1.5.0-7.src.rpm Checking tcltls, version 1.5.0, release 7... Are the name, version and release correct according to Fedora's package naming guidelines ([y]/n) y View the last spec diff ? ([y]/n) n Checking source 0 Source tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz is different from upstream (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) Patches found: tcltls-configurein.pkgname.patch, tcltls-1.5-rpmoptflags.patch, tcltls-1.5-64bit.patch, tcltls-makefilein-soname.patch, tcltls-tclm4-soname.patch, tcltls-1.5-relpath.patch, tcltls-1.5-pkgindex-version.patch, tcltls-1.5-ciphertest-KRB5.patch. Look at the patches ? ([y]/n) Interrupted by user -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 14:10:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167364] Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251410.k3PEApXa030584@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167364 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-25 10:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128201) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128201&action=view) Fix first pass issues with spec First pass items: * URL should be: http://fuse-emulator.sourceforge.net/ * Source0 should be: http://dl.sf.net/fuse-emulator/fuse-utils-%{version}.tar.gz * Can't check that sources match upstream because no current SRPM URL posted * No comment explaining need for ExcludeArch * Description has "Fuse-emulation-utils " rather than "fuse-emulator-utils" * %setup needs -n fuse-utils-%{version} * Binaries are all installed mode 644 so they can't be executed - Easier just to use "make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install" * Please include ChangeLog as %doc * Package shouldn't own %{_bindir} * Add "chmod 644 createhdf.c" in %prep to fix rpmlint warning for debuginfo pkg Please ensure that your packages actually build (preferably in mock) before submitting them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 14:15:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251415.k3PEFBn8032051@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From wk at ire.pw.edu.pl 2006-04-25 10:14 EST ------- Yes. I investigated this a bit and found that gd package does not have pkgconfig file (libgdgeda has it), so I disabled a test for library version (PKG_CHECK_MODULES, line 177 of configure.ac). Unfortunately this test provides some compile and link flags, including -lgdgeda. Both gd and libgdgeda have their own config scripts (gdlib-config and libgdgeda-config) that should also give the flags but gdlib.config --libs do not return anything like -lgd. I will try to add it manually and see the result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 14:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251448.k3PEm07q011638@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 10:47 EST ------- I'll work on the assumption that you'll remove the Provides: from the next version. The package builds fine; I even learned a bit about erlang so that I could install and test it. Unfortunately there are a few problems. The only thing I think is blocking is the errant provide of sdl_driver.so, although I'd like to know what's up with the debuginfo RPM. rpmlint says: E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_util.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_audio.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_wrapper.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glext.h E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glu.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_gen.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glext.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl.h E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_driver.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_spec.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_video.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_events.c E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_gl.c I have no idea what it's on about here, or why RPM would choose to put copies of development files into the debuginfo RPM. I'm not inclined to hold up inclusion of this package because of this, E: erlang-esdl-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is ignorable. Issues: The license 2-clause BSD like with an added section indicating what rights the US government gets (and also indicating that this doesn't limit anyone's rights). To me it seems clearly free; someone might want to look over it and decide whether there a better license tag for this than "Distributable", but I don't see this as a blocker. The final package provides sdl_driver.so, but I'm not sure that it should since that library is buried in /usr/lib/erlang/lib/esdl-0.95.0630/priv/. What's your opinion here? Note that this also ends up in the -debuginfo package's provide list, and I'm not sure it's even possible to filter it. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. O license field is "Distributable", which is an accurate description. License text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: e892f64e9c5f6eca037757e5c38667ce esdl-0.95.0630.src.tar.gz e892f64e9c5f6eca037757e5c38667ce esdl-0.95.0630.src.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). O rpmlint complains; see above. X final provides list is not completely sane. * shared libraries are present, but not in any of the linker's paths so there's no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; the tests are graphical in nature. I ran them myself to ensure that the package built correctly. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers and included C source files are in a -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 14:50:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251450.k3PEoORT012436@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-25 10:50 EST ------- Not sure about the naming convention for this one. compat- packages usually build without -devel packages and are there for runtime rather than build-time compatibility with older apps. The only compat-*-devel packages I can find in FC5 or FE5 are the wxGTK packages. For build-time compatibility, a name like gtkhtml36 would seem more sensible, but that could cause confusion with the main package being gtkhtml3 and hence giving the appearance of being "older". However, this does meet the package naming guidelines, which the compat- package doesn't. Another thing: are the static libraries really needed? Minor nit: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.6.so.18.0.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 14:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251453.k3PErjnI013187@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-25 10:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > think is blocking is the errant provide of sdl_driver.so, although I'd like to > know what's up with the debuginfo RPM. > > rpmlint says: > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_util.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_audio.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_wrapper.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glext.h > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glu.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_gen.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_glext.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl.h > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_driver.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_spec.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_video.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_events.c > E: erlang-esdl-debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/esdl-0.95.0630/c_src/esdl_gl.c > > I have no idea what it's on about here, or why RPM would choose to put copies of > development files into the debuginfo RPM. I'm not inclined to hold up inclusion > of this package because of this, These can be fixed by removing the exec bit from the listed files using chmod in %prep. There's no reason for .c or .h files to be executable... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 14:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189874] Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251453.k3PErmiu013213@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189874 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251501.k3PF1bif015180@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-25 11:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > The package builds fine; I even learned a bit about erlang so that I could > install and test it. Unfortunately there are a few problems. The only thing I > think is blocking is the errant provide of sdl_driver.so, This seems not to be problem, it also happens with other packages, for example mesa-libGL provides mga_dri.so, although this is in /usr/lib/dri, or epiphany-extensions and many others. > although I'd like to > know what's up with the debuginfo RPM. I can't say anything about this. On the other hand, maybe the c_src directory can be excluded entirely. > Issues: > The license 2-clause BSD like with an added section indicating what rights the > US government gets (and also indicating that this doesn't limit anyone's > rights). To me it seems clearly free; someone might want to look over it and > decide whether there a better license tag for this than "Distributable", but I > don't see this as a blocker. I am not familiar with legal matters, so I must rely on your judgement. What do you propose? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:01:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251501.k3PF1wZF015305@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-25 11:01 EST ------- I have the following md5sum from both upstream and the latest src rpm: 9eeab472475773b3810acc808ebec759 tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz However, the Source0: tag can't be used directly to get the sources due to the sourceforge download redirection. Try using "dl.sourceforge.net" instead of "download.sourceforge.net". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:06:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251506.k3PF6uMq016763@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-25 11:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > I have no idea what it's on about here, or why RPM would choose to put copies of > > development files into the debuginfo RPM. I'm not inclined to hold up inclusion > > of this package because of this, > > These can be fixed by removing the exec bit from the listed files using chmod in > %prep. There's no reason for .c or .h files to be executable... Indeed. Strangely the installed .c and .h files are non-executable, whereas the files in build dir are. I included a fix in the spec file. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/erlang-esdl-0.95.0630-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:12:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] New: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/lash.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/lash-0.5.1-1.src.rpm Description: LASH is a session management system for JACK and ALSA audio applications on GNU/Linux. This package depends on jack-audio-connection-kit, which is currently under review. I'm about to submit other packages depending on LASH. This spec file is based on an old ccrma spec file, but with several changes and newer sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:16:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] New: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-1.0.7a-3.src.rpm Description: FluidSynth is a real-time software synthesizer based on the SoundFont 2 specifications. It is a "software synthesizer". FluidSynth can read MIDI events from the MIDI input device and render them to the audio device. It can also play MIDI files (note: FluidSynth was previously called IIWU Synth). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251516.k3PFGqx4019533@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 11:16 EST ------- To Paul: They are chmod'ed after they're installed, and they don't have execute permission in the final package. So RPM is looking in the build tree for debug stuff instead of the install tree? That's pretty odd; I'll have to poke around further. To G?rard: Good point about the extra provide; all sorts of packages (even language addon packages like perl-PDL) do this without issue, so I'll drop my objection. It would certainly simply a few things of c_src were simply omitted, but I don't know enough about erlang to understand whether that's possible. I suggest trying out Paul's suggestion to see if it keeps RPM from stuffing unnecessary things into the debuginfo package. About the license, I have no problems with it as it stands; I was hoping that someone else would have some advice. The license text is at http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/esdl-license.terms if anyone wants to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:17:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251517.k3PFHpQi019742@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-04-25 11:17 EST ------- Removing fedora-extras-list, because we should have got the attention of people who care about emacs sub-packages by now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:20:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186887] Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251520.k3PFKAfw020173@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |186811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:20:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251520.k3PFKVd2020280@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |186887 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:22:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189874] Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251522.k3PFMMLI020659@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189874 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 11:22 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included in the package. * source files match upstream: 23ae21fea8a30477aba508b4a6f785b5 Test-SubCalls-0.05.tar.gz 23ae21fea8a30477aba508b4a6f785b5 Test-SubCalls-0.05.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:24:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251524.k3PFOL3M021867@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-25 11:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > To Paul: > > They are chmod'ed after they're installed, and they don't have execute > permission in the final package. So RPM is looking in the build tree for debug > stuff instead of the install tree? That's pretty odd; I'll have to poke around > further. My understanding of the debuginfo package is that it contains symbol tables etc. for the binaries that have been built (the information that gets removed by "strip -g"). This information comes from the build area for all packages; most don't install .c or .h files anywhere anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:27:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189877] Review Request: perl-Module-Locate - Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251527.k3PFRQeg022947@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Locate - Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189877 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-25 11:27 EST ------- Clean package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:28:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] New: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd-0.1.17-3.src.rpm Description: This is a virtual keyboard for AWE, MIDI and ALSA drivers. It's a simple fake of a MIDI keyboard on X-windows system. Enjoy a music with your mouse and "computer" keyboard :-) Adapted from old ccmra spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] New: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblo-0.23-3.src.rpm Description: liblo is an implementation of the Open Sound Control protocol for POSIX systems developed by Steve Harris. Adapted from an old ccrma spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:32:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251532.k3PFWV1d024407@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at redhat.com 2006-04-25 11:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > 2 remarks: > - The summary isn't quite correct: LibGLw provides Xt and Xm OpenGL widgets. > It doesn't provide Xaw widgets. > > - Instead of building a standalone libGLw from Mesa's tarball, wouldn't it be > easier to use SGI's original sources (I don't know if and where they still are > available as a separate tarball) and to patch them to Mesa's state, or even to > drop Mesa's libGLw in favor of SGI's? Possibly. I'm not 100% certain, but I think SGI's is what was present in XFree86 and X.Org monolithic source tree. Might want to have the license police go over it with a fine tooth comb first though, as ISTR there being some bad-juju SGI licenses in the tree, although I don't remember if that was for libGLw, or for GLX. Ajax probably remembers though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:35:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] New: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi-0.9-3.src.rpm Description: Disposable Soft Synth Interface (DSSI, pronounced "dizzy") is a proposal for a plugin API for software instruments (soft synths) with user interfaces, permitting them to be hosted in-process by Linux audio applications. Think of it as LADSPA-for-instruments, or something comparable to a simpler version of VSTi. Adapted from old ccrma spec file. This package depends on many recently submitted FE packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:35:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251535.k3PFZpHU025447@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-25 11:35 EST ------- Please bump the release number with package revision, even during review. The SRPM at the posted URL does not contain the same spec file as the one at the posted spec URL (still missing ldconfig scriptlets). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251542.k3PFgDh0027604@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-25 11:42 EST ------- Any updates on this package? I'm sure that I'm not the only one that would like to see this get into extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:49:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189827] Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251549.k3PFncV8029303@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189827 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:50:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251550.k3PFoV3a029505@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-25 11:50 EST ------- Neither boo or ikvm can be included with MonoDevelop currently. I can build all of the packages for x86, but there is a problem (down to I think the way mono packages it's bits and pieces) for x86_64. The i386 rpms work fine under x86_64 though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:55:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251555.k3PFttvt031130@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-25 11:55 EST ------- God: + Build fine in mock. + Local install and remove work fine. + Starting and stoping of the service worked fine. + rpmlint of binary rpm ok. + rpmlint of source rpm ok. APPROVED !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 15:59:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251559.k3PFxTM2031864@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-25 11:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Possibly. I'm not 100% certain, but I think SGI's is what was present in > XFree86 and X.Org monolithic source tree. This matches with my memory. > Might want to have the license police go over it with a fine tooth comb > first though, as ISTR there being some bad-juju SGI licenses in the tree, c.f. http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/projects/ogl-sample/main/gfx/lib/glw/ http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ogl-sample/faq.html and http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/inventor/libSoXt/src/ http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/inventor/libSoXt/include [Contains slightly modified LGPL'ed versions of the GLw widgets] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 16:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251602.k3PG2K3L000424@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-25 12:02 EST ------- I removed the c_src directory from erlang-esdl-devel. I compiled Wings3D against erlang-esdl and erlang-esdl-devel and later removed erlang-esdl-devel. Wings3D runs well, so I presume this is alright. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/erlang-esdl-0.95.0630-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 16:09:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189874] Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251609.k3PG9on6002287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189874 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-25 12:09 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. Will try to finish the PPI specfile shortly (beta: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PPI-1.112-0.src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 16:11:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189877] Review Request: perl-Module-Locate - Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251611.k3PGBLNw002564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Locate - Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189877 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-25 12:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 16:28:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251628.k3PGS7DV006757@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 12:27 EST ------- I think you linked to an older package there, but I found the -4 package in that directory and gave it a spin. Everything looks good; rpmlint is quiet save for the "only-non-binary-in-usr-lib" thing which is OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 16:35:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251635.k3PGZq3x009596@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-25 12:35 EST ------- God: + Local build works fine. + Source in the rpm are the same as upstream. + Build on mock works fine. + rpmlint of source rpm ok. + rpmlint of binaries rpms ok. ? can start example_server and example_client without a crash Bad: - The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 16:45:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251645.k3PGjbEg013650@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-04-25 12:45 EST ------- ok, as you said now with dl.sourceforge.net: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls-1.5.0-8.src.rpm Hope this is finally the right one, I must be the worst packager ever.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 16:55:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251655.k3PGtNpu015915@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-25 12:55 EST ------- I'll remove the static libraries - they are not needed. With respect to the name - core uses compat-* compat-db.i386 4.2.52-4 core compat-gcc-32.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core compat-gcc-32-c++.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core compat-gcc-32-g77.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core compat-libf2c-32.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core compat-libgcc-296.i386 2.96-135 core compat-libstdc++-296.i386 2.96-135 core compat-openldap.i386 2.3.19_2.2.29-4 core compat-readline43.i386 4.3-2.1 core compat-slang.i386 1.4.9-27.2.1 core readline, gcc, libstdc++ are examples where it uses compat-oldname-version as the package name. With respect to the devel package - it obviously isn't needed for runtime use, but it may be useful for building software that either doesn't work with new gtkhtml - or for software where the port to the new gtkhtml3 isn't as good as the older version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 17:01:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251701.k3PH1V9d017015@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-25 13:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I'll remove the static libraries - they are not needed. > With respect to the name - core uses compat-* > > compat-db.i386 4.2.52-4 core > compat-gcc-32.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core > compat-gcc-32-c++.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core > compat-gcc-32-g77.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core > compat-libf2c-32.i386 3.2.3-55.fc5 core > compat-libgcc-296.i386 2.96-135 core > compat-libstdc++-296.i386 2.96-135 core > compat-openldap.i386 2.3.19_2.2.29-4 core > compat-readline43.i386 4.3-2.1 core > compat-slang.i386 1.4.9-27.2.1 core Note that none of the above have a -devel package; that's what I was getting at regarding runtime and build-time compatibility. > With respect to the devel package - it obviously isn't needed for runtime use, > but it may be useful for building software that either doesn't work with new > gtkhtml - or for software where the port to the new gtkhtml3 isn't as good as > the older version. Yes, I get that - after all that's why this package is here. The package naming guidelines say this: Multiple packages with the same base name For many reasons, it is sometimes advantageous to keep multiple versions of a package in Fedora Core and Fedora Extras, to be installed simultaneously. When doing so, the package name should reflect this fact. The most recent version of a package should use the base name with no versions, and all other addons should note their version in the name. The exception to this are kernel and kernel-module-* packages, which can have multiple versions installed concurrently with the same base name (but different versions). Example: openssl occasionally has multiple versions in Fedora for backwards compatibility. The most current version of openssl has Name: openssl The previous version of openssl has Name: openssl096b Note that we do not use delimiters in the name in this situation, we remove the period '.' from the version number and attach it to the name. To be honest I think that the name you have is better but the precedents and naming guidelines suggest otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 17:31:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251731.k3PHVr57027800@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 13:31 EST ------- This is really shaping up so I'll go ahead and sign on for a review. (Others are certainly welcome to join in.) Let's dispense with rpmlint stuff: W: bugzilla no-documentation You moved all of the documentation off to the -doc subpackage. The usual practise seems to be to keep some basic documentation like changelogs or readmes in the main package and move extensive stuff off to the subpackage; I'd suggest keeping QUICKSTART, README and UPGRADING* in the base package but it's certainly up to you as there's no hard rule here. E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/template/en/default/admin/keywords/list.html.tmpl E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/template/en/default/admin/keywords/edit.html.tmpl E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/gnatsparse/README E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/gnatsparse/magic.py E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/template/en/default/admin/keywords/create.html.tmpl E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/template/en/default/admin/keywords/rebuild-cache.html.tmpl E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/template/en/default/admin/keywords/created.html.tmpl E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/template/en/default/admin/keywords/confirm-delete.html.tmpl E: bugzilla script-without-shellbang /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/gnatsparse/gnatsparse.py These all have executable permission, but they shouldn't. Perhaps the python scripts should, but they would need to start with #!/usr/bin/python. E: bugzilla version-control-internal-file /var/www/bugzilla/template/en/.cvsignore E: bugzilla version-control-internal-file /var/www/bugzilla/template/.cvsignore E: bugzilla version-control-internal-file /var/www/bugzilla/Bugzilla/.cvsignore E: bugzilla-doc version-control-internal-file /var/www/bugzilla/docs/.cvsignore These should all be deleted. E: bugzilla non-executable-script /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/gnats2bz.pl 0644 E: bugzilla non-executable-script /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/cvs-update.pl 0644 E: bugzilla non-executable-script /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/sendbugmail.pl 0644 E: bugzilla non-executable-script /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/jb2bz.py 0644 E: bugzilla non-executable-script /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/sendunsentbugmail.pl 0644 E: bugzilla non-executable-script /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/yp_nomail.sh 0644 E: bugzilla-doc non-executable-script /var/www/bugzilla/docs/makedocs.pl 0644 I think it's safe to ignore these, but we'll have to think about consistency. W: bugzilla non-conffile-in-etc /etc/httpd/conf.d/bugzilla.conf Safe to ignore. E: bugzilla wrong-script-interpreter /var/www/bugzilla/contrib/jb2bz.py "/usr/local/bin/python" Should probably be fixed. About the contrib directory: Is it safe, or even appropriate to stick this stuff in the webroot? I would argue that it isn't, or that access to it from the web should be severely restricted. Generally this kind of thing is packaged (execute bits off) with the documentation as examples or under /usr/lib Is everything in /var/www/bugzilla intended to be visible from the web or accessed by one of the scripts run by the web server? Stuff that's run from cron jobs shouldn't be there. What about the t directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 17:44:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251744.k3PHigIU001689@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-25 13:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Are there any yet-another python implementation? I don't know, but some people do want different versions (newer, older, whatever) installed. Python aside, another example are kernel module packages. Yes, it is acceptable to compile on the fly or %post or something in some folks' opinion (for example DKMS does that unless I'm mistaken), but there is strong opposition to that from others. > and even if someone does support byte-compiling installation for python, > it may be less worth efforts. Less than for various Emacsen? I fail to see why. > For %{_netsharedpath} and read-only /usr/share mounts, it could just stops to > do byte-compiling if installation path is included in %{_netsharedpath} since > rpm won't do anything. Yes, but that kind of defeats the idea of getting stuff byte compiled for whatever Emacsen are installed on that particular box. On a side note, there have been lots of reports over time on xemacs-beta about Debian's setup being broken and resulting in for example XEmacs somehow getting *.elc bytecompiled by GNU Emacs in its load path. That will obviously wreak havoc. OTOH my gut feeling is that the reports are less frequent nowadays so it's possible that the Debian folks have got it fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 17:48:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251748.k3PHm2Se002434@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-25 13:48 EST ------- Sorry, you may have a strange problem. I got fedora-qa tcltls-1.5.0-8.src.rpm Starting QA for local srpm tcltls-1.5.0-8.src.rpm Checking tcltls, version 1.5.0, release 8... Are the name, version and release correct according to Fedora's package naming guidelines ([y]/n) y Diff the spec files ? ([y]/n) n Checking source 0 tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz 12 kB 00:00 Source tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz is different from upstream (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) Patches found: tcltls-configurein.pkgname.patch, tcltls-1.5-rpmoptflags.patch, tcltls-1.5-64bit.patch, tcltls-makefilein-soname.patch, tcltls-tclm4-soname.patch, tcltls-1.5-relpath.patch, tcltls-1.5-pkgindex-version.patch, tcltls-1.5-ciphertest-KRB5.patch. Look at the patches ? ([y]/n) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 17:50:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251750.k3PHobEu002880@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-25 13:50 EST ------- for Information the md5sum from the downloaded file is: 2e39bbc3b1cc8f837fe7a0abec9bdaad tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz The source in in the rpm have the following md5sum: 9eeab472475773b3810acc808ebec759 tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 17:56:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251756.k3PHuso3005463@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-25 13:56 EST ------- Same question rephrased: what's the real world benefit of having the GIDs consistent across systems *in this particular case* for these three game executables? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 17:56:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251756.k3PHuimO005445@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-25 13:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > 2e39bbc3b1cc8f837fe7a0abec9bdaad tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz > > 9eeab472475773b3810acc808ebec759 tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz Are the file sizes the same? Can you untar the downloaded file and the tarball in the src rpm and run "diff -r" to check the differences? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:04:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251804.k3PI44Qx008116@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-25 14:03 EST ------- My feeling is that, while what Akira is suggesting has merit, what it's ultimately an attempt to do is to bend rpm to deal with installation from source (.el) rather than binary.. it's not so dissimilar to gentoos ebuilds etc. It really seems like trying to get rpm to do things it wasn't designed to do. I'm in favour of keeping things simple, working with binary packages, and not aiming for the canonical solution. Pragmatically though, we can't move to using a emacsen-common like approach until someone steps forward to do the necessary work, and I can't really see that happening unless the solution is applicable to more than emacs lisp packages. [On a tangent though, if there was a mechanism for installing an rpm of source files (be they .el, python modules, C, or whaterver) and having builds triggered by installation of other packages, that'd be a really nice way to install a kernel module package that autobuilt every time the kernel was updated. However, again this is clearly a different model than rpm was designed for as it's based on sources management, not binaries. I suppose Conary might have capability akin to this] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:08:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251808.k3PI8Bne009707@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-25 14:07 EST ------- OK - I changed the name to gtkhtml36 and fixed the rpmlint error and removed static libs. As soon as my mock build finishes, I'll upload the fixed src.rpm and spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:10:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251810.k3PIAOH4010246@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-25 14:10 EST ------- Consistent GIDs are useful if the scoreboard files are to be shared across a cluster. This is how nethack and the like were configured at my university's computing cluster. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:17:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251817.k3PIHLU8011970@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-25 14:17 EST ------- Ok, I give up. But if you intend to keep the current implementation, a dependency on fedora-usermgmt needs to be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:30:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251830.k3PIUiBf016187@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-04-25 14:30 EST ------- There are several questions here, and I'm not sure this bug is the best place to discuss this, but here are my thoughts: - Should elisp packages have their own namespace? (ie, like perl- packages) I don't know that this is worth it... how many elisp packages are out there that aren't already shipped with emacs/xemacs? If I am using repoquery right, not many: emacs: apel-0:10.6-8.fc5.noarch bigloo-emacs-0:2.8a-1.20060322.fc5.i386 emacs-auctex-0:11.82-3.fc5.noarch mew-0:4.2-2.fc5.i386 ruby-mode-0:1.8.4-3.2.i386 uim-el-0:1.0.1-2.fc5.i386 w3m-el-0:1.4.4-2.fc5.i386 xemacs: bigloo-xemacs-0:2.8a-1.20060322.fc5.i386 mew-xemacs-0:4.2-2.fc5.i386 w3m-el-xemacs-0:1.4.4-2.fc5.i386 - Should we byte compile at install time instead of build time? PRO: one package works for both xemacs/emacs. PRO: byte compiled files exactly match installed emacs/xemacs. CON: increase rpm install time. CON: if disk space runs out bad things happen CON: adds complexity CON: .elc files won't be verifyable via rpm In any case we can bring these questions to FESCO... but for this package I think we should just use the base package name and ship the compiled files, it can be changed if the policy is decided to change (as indeed other packages will need to be changed). Can we move this discussion to the extras list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:46:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251846.k3PIkflv022174@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-04-25 14:46 EST ------- OK, I fixed the empty docs (oops!) and ghosted the .pyo files. This is my first python package, so I wasn't aware of that. Updated packages at: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/mftrace.spec http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/mftrace-1.1.19-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:52:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251852.k3PIqGZR023634@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-25 14:52 EST ------- New src.rpm and spec file: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36-3.6.2-2.fc5.src.rpm http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 18:53:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251853.k3PIrt1p024103@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-25 14:53 EST ------- As I think about it more, I'm changing my mind that fedora-usermgmt is needed here. consistent gids in a cluster is better solved by nis or some other network login system. These aren't system groups that need to be installed, so plain groupadd should be enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 19:16:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251916.k3PJG3PP031930@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-04-25 15:16 EST ------- http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnfnetlink.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnfnetlink-0.0.14-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 19:39:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251939.k3PJdlTi012264@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-25 15:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #66) > The ultimate goal of this Swish-e packaging effort has been meet, in a much more > reliable and capable manner, by Beagle and other packages. I doubt anyone will > be using this as a template/ example for adding functionality to Fedora in the > future. > The fact that a package with similar functionality has been added does not mean that swish-e shouldnot be added. Free software / Fedora Extras is all about choice, nowhere in the FE guidelines it says that it is discouraged or forbidden to package Free Software with somewhat redundant functionality. So I encourage you to still go ahead and start a fresh new review for swish-e if you still want to and use it yourself. > Your suggestion of closing this request seems to be the best course of action. If my above comment hasn't helped to make you restart the review process for swish-e please close this bug as won'tfix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 19:41:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251941.k3PJf3EO012771@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-25 15:41 EST ------- > gdlib-config --libs does not return anything like -lgd. Strange, adding -lgd manualy should make rpm pick up the libgd dependency for libgeda. Let me know if you need any help with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 19:48:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604251948.k3PJmUfp015403@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-25 15:48 EST ------- That was quick, before I start doing a full review, one very important question remains: As I've understood you've written pybackpack yourself for google's summer of code last summer and then sorta went under the radar, assuming I've understood this correctly, what are the chances of you dropping under the radar again in the future? I think its great you want to create and maintain an FE package of your software, but "we" expect a certain amound of responsivenes / reachability from contributers. We don't want users and other contributers to get frustrated by a (total) lack of response / communication. We're all volunteers so I'm not asking for 24 hour max respnse time, and a response could be: "sorry real busy with real life right now I'll look at this next month, if you hear nothing within 6 weeks poke me" Please don't take this the wrong way, but before I sponsor someone especially my first someone, I would like some assurance (a promise will do) that you won't "disappear" (again). OTOH I might have misunderstood the history surrounding this, again in that case please don't take this wrong :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 20:12:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252012.k3PKCNEp022105@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-25 16:12 EST ------- It's seems to be a access problem to dl.sourceforge.com When I download the .tar.gz file with firefox, I get a proper file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 20:18:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252018.k3PKINq7024161@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-25 16:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > > *Summary must not start with "A ...." drop the "A " . > > I could not find such a rule in the packaging guidelines and from my > linguistic feeling, a leading "A " sounds better. > You're right its not (no longer) in the guidelines, somehow it got in my head as being a guideline, I think it has been on the MUST FIX list from reviews of my own packages too, I don't know the history. > > *These: > > Requires(pre): %crontabdir > > Requires(postun): %crontabdir > > ... are required resp. the best current way to express: > > * the directory must exist before the package places files into it. Else, > when the directory is a symlink (e.g. compare /etc/init.d) in the owning > package, you will create oddities. > > * the package must be removed before the directory. Else, the directory > can not be removed because it still contains files from 'kismet' and > becomes orphaned. Therefore, a strict '%crontabdir -> kismet' order > on installation, and 'kismet -> %crontabdir' order on uninstallation > is required. A plain 'Requires:' does not *guarantees* such an order. > I understand / already thought as much, but in essence this means that you require the crontabs package so why not just replace these 3 lines: Requires(missingok): crontabs Requires(pre): %crontabdir Requires(postun): %crontabdir with: Requires: crontabs ? Anyways this is just a remark, not a blocker. However unfortunatly the following x86_64 (rawhide) builderror is a blocker: gpsmap.cc:2217: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision and the 2 suspicious warnings are still there, probably also 64 bit related: gpsmap.cc:868: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data gpsmap.cc:876: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data I'll take a look at/into this, but my time for Fedora is scarce at the moment. > > > W: kismet-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/kismet-2005-08-R1/libpcap-0.9.1-kis/bpf_filter.c ./bpf/net/bpf_filter.c > > Most of these are OK / have a good reason, so they are ok, it would > > be nice if you could fix the last one though, but that is not a > > blocker. > > I think this is a bug in rpm's debuginfo-generator and do not know how > to solve it cleanly. > Yes it is, I hit it very rescently too, it doesn't handle symlinks properly (it packages the symlink and not the link target instead, or both. > > * Upstream has a much newer version, it would be nice to upgrade to > > that version. > > ok, updated to it. But... it causes ugly warnings and I created a lot > of patches fixing them. They are reported upstream; see > > http://www.kismetwireless.net/Forum/General/Messages/1145789909.7993579 > > I know that they are making the new package different to this one > reviewed by you, but I think they are required (at least the -packed > and -alias patches). I haven't thoroughly re-reviewed this, I did take a peek. You would have been free under the guidelines to make this version jump after the initial import of the previous version anyways, thus there is no need for a complete re-review and this review is taking way too long already so I'm not restarting it from scratch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 20:26:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252026.k3PKQ5g3026291@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-25 16:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > ... are required resp. the best current way to express: > > > > * the directory must exist before the package places files into it. Else, > > when the directory is a symlink (e.g. compare /etc/init.d) in the owning > > package, you will create oddities. > > > > * the package must be removed before the directory. Else, the directory > > can not be removed because it still contains files from 'kismet' and > > becomes orphaned. Therefore, a strict '%crontabdir -> kismet' order > > on installation, and 'kismet -> %crontabdir' order on uninstallation > > is required. A plain 'Requires:' does not *guarantees* such an order. > > > > I understand / already thought as much, but in essence this means that you > require the crontabs package so why not just replace these 3 lines: > Requires(missingok): crontabs > Requires(pre): %crontabdir > Requires(postun): %crontabdir > > with: > Requires: crontabs > Because with a transaction that includes the removal or addition of crontabs, unless (pre) and (postun) are used this could get installed prior to crontabs and thus you run into the chicken before the egg syndrome. If the other package contents need to be on the file system before this package can install, and need to remain on the file system until after this package is removed, then it needs (pre) and (postun) requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 20:31:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252031.k3PKVRaP027642@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-25 16:31 EST ------- Paul, It seems that your mono reviews are not moving along as intended. Although my mono experience is limited, I'm willing to help. Unfortunatly my time too is limited and currently there are a couple of other reviews which I've already promised todo. However once those are done (this may take upto a week) if nobody has done yours I'll start reviewing your mono-packages. Do you have any preferences for which one I should review first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 20:34:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189827] Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252034.k3PKYc4V028691@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189827 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 16:34 EST ------- Issues: Please use the full URL in the Source tag whenever possible. If you do this, spectool can grab the upstream sources straight from the 'net. Since there's nothing else wrong with this package, I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently, but Source0: does not refer to the full URL of the source file. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and both Artistic and GPL texts are included in the package. * source files match upstream: ab776b32945db7832acfeab5fd5cfbb6 perl-PBS-0.31.tar.gz ab776b32945db7832acfeab5fd5cfbb6 perl-PBS-0.31.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. O shared libraries are present, but they are internal to Perl so there is no reason to run ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED (but please fix the Source0 URL) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 20:48:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189827] Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252048.k3PKm9Mg001826@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189827 ------- Additional Comments From garrick at usc.edu 2006-04-25 16:47 EST ------- Thanks! I've added it to CVS with a full Source0 URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 20:53:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189827] Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252053.k3PKrAI9003312@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PBS - Perl binding for the Portable Batch System client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189827 garrick at usc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252102.k3PL2824005518@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-25 17:01 EST ------- I guess any which haven't been assigned first would be useful. I'm not sure about the licence for mysql-connector-net. From the looks of it, it's GPL with restrictions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:03:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252103.k3PL31kS005675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-25 17:02 EST ------- I have moved the namespace discussion to the FE list. However, I don't feel I understand the build in %post proposal well enough to properly convey it to the list - Akira, if you have the time and energy, I think it's worth bringing that up on FE list as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:05:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252105.k3PL5bjG006712@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-04-25 17:05 EST ------- OK, I added gettext and %find_lang. It seems to be working properly, though I'm not really familiar with how to use them. I have changed the vim directory to match that of development. I agree that manually stripping object files is undesirable, but it doesn't seem to get it any other way. Running rpmlint on the resulting rpm gives: W: lilypond unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/lilypond/2.8.1/python/midi.so W: lilypond file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/music-glossary.info.gz (Note that ignoring the not-utf8 error for now because I think the best way to fix this is in upstream). Is there something I need to do to make sure it looks for the .so file? It's only one file and not that big, so I suppose maybe it's not a big deal to have debuginfo in it. New spec and srpm: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:30:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252130.k3PLUwIP014551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-25 17:30 EST ------- Could you try this: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml-2.01-7.fc5.src.rpm If it doesn't work, we need to get an expert on x86_64 compiling and linking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:36:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252136.k3PLao6S016226@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-25 17:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Hope this is finally the right one, I must be the worst packager ever.. Nah, I've seen (and written!) much worse. :) This and #185951 look like your first Extras packages. If this is true then you need to add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker bug to both so that potential sponsors can review and approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:38:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252138.k3PLcDwi016664@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-25 17:38 EST ------- Builds successfully on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. Now it should be possible to review wings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:38:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252138.k3PLckHf016870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 Bug 188208 depends on bug 188207, which changed state. Bug 188207 Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 21:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] New: Review Request: unifdef Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 Summary: Review Request: unifdef Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/unifdef.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/unifdef-1.171-1.src.rpm Description: Unifdef is useful for removing ifdefed lines from a file while otherwise leaving the file alone. Unifdef acts on #ifdef, #ifndef, #else, and #endif lines, and it knows only enough about C and C++ to know when one of these is inactive because it is inside a comment, or a single or double quote. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 22:08:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175502] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252208.k3PM8plS022915@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175502 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 22:10:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252210.k3PMAGLb023315@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-04-25 18:10 EST ------- The plan is to use this when building the kernel package, which is why it's proposed for Core, not Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 22:11:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252211.k3PMBKtv023546@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-25 18:10 EST ------- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 22:16:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252216.k3PMGZfd024582@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 pnasrat at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnasrat at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat at redhat.com 2006-04-25 18:16 EST ------- rpmlint fails (warning and error): rpmlint python-lxml-0.9.1-1.src.rpm W: python-lxml summary-ended-with-dot ElementTree-like Python bindings for libxml2 and libxslt. E: python-lxml description-line-too-long lxml provides a Python binding to the libxslt and libxml2 libraries. It follows Can you fix those up and we'll start again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 22:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252222.k3PMM1ZZ025566@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 pnasrat at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pnasrat at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 22:52:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252252.k3PMqOO5032502@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 18:52 EST ------- I must admit that I don't fully understand the .pyo issue either; I package denyhosts which is also in Python and the variable behavior with respect to .pyo files has been nothing but trouble for me. Currently I ghost them all. Anyway, I just rebuilt in mock and everything now looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 23:26:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252326.k3PNQNiK005677@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 19:25 EST ------- Armed with my thimblefull of Erlang knowledge I move on to this package. First issues: 1,$s/esdl/erlang-esdl/ It might be worth noting in the description that this package includes the POV exporter. Parallel make would be nice. (Sorry, I do my testing on an 8-CPU Opteron machine and hate to wait.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 23:34:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252334.k3PNYJ90007557@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-25 19:34 EST ------- I have already been making a new package: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/wings-0.98.32b-4.fc5.src.rpm parallel make breaks the build, unfortunately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 23:37:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252337.k3PNb9oS008597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-25 19:37 EST ------- License update -------------- After having contacted the author about the license mismatch, he released a new version of Log-Dispatch-FileRotate: the license in version 1.15 is now "GPL or Artistic". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 25 23:59:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604252359.k3PNx1NV013307@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-25 19:58 EST ------- The setgid handling could be improved to be a little safer. The current setgid patch uses "setegid()" to temporarily drop setgid rights until it tries to write to the score file. It would be better if the scorefile were opened once at the beginning of the program, then dropped permanently with setresgid(). Additionally, the "LoadScores()" function shouldn't need any setgid/getgid code at all if you make the high score file mode 0664 (it's currently 0060). I don't see any reason why it couldn't be world readable. I'll do a full review, but it would be easier if the above items were fixed in CVS first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 00:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260000.k3Q00bOE013562@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 00:17:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260017.k3Q0HZVc019438@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 jima at auroralinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-04-25 20:17 EST ------- Built on devel, FC5, FC4, and (after a bit of work) FC3. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 00:20:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189816] Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260020.k3Q0K0JA020127@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: videodog - Command-line video4linux frame-grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189816 jima at auroralinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-04-25 20:19 EST ------- Built cleanly on devel, FC5, FC4, and FC3. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 01:08:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260108.k3Q18IWu002265@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 qspencer at ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 01:08:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260108.k3Q18bON002378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 Bug 189656 depends on bug 189655, which changed state. Bug 189655 Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 01:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260112.k3Q1CSP2003057@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-25 21:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Consistent GIDs are useful if the scoreboard files are to be shared across a > cluster. This is how nethack and the like were configured at my university's > computing cluster. So what? What guarantees these uids/gids are consistent with that you rsp. fedora-usermgnt chose? Answer: Your system administrator. Neither you nor fedora-usermgnt will be able to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 01:23:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189949] New: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mystun/mystun.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mystun/mystun-cvs_20060204-1.src.rpm Description: The STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs (Network Address Translation)) server is an implementation of the STUN protocol that enables STUN functionality in SIP-based systems. STUN is an application-layer protocol that can determine the public IP and nature of a NAT device that sits between the STUN client and STUN server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 01:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260138.k3Q1ceFT008402@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-25 21:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > Less than for various Emacsen? I fail to see why. Well, in the release cycle POV. newer release of emacs isn't seen a long time. I suppose there may be strong request to use the latest emacs but may wants to keep the stable version together. but yes, there may be more or less such requirements on others as well. > Yes, but that kind of defeats the idea of getting stuff byte compiled for > whatever Emacsen are installed on that particular box. > > On a side note, there have been lots of reports over time on xemacs-beta about > Debian's setup being broken and resulting in for example XEmacs somehow getting > *.elc bytecompiled by GNU Emacs in its load path. That will obviously wreak > havoc. OTOH my gut feeling is that the reports are less frequent nowadays so > it's possible that the Debian folks have got it fixed. Ouch. Though I haven't seen any xemacs-beta package for Debian yet - at least in the official tree - it may be because it just doesn't follow the emacsen-common-way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 01:46:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260146.k3Q1k2dh010277@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-04-25 21:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > My feeling is that, while what Akira is suggesting has merit, what it's > ultimately an attempt to do is to bend rpm to deal with installation from source > (.el) rather than binary.. it's not so dissimilar to gentoos ebuilds etc. It > really seems like trying to get rpm to do things it wasn't designed to do. I'm > in favour of keeping things simple, working with binary packages, and not aiming > for the canonical solution. it's sensible. discussing something without the real implementation is little messy. so I'll try to do it when I have a time, and let's continue to discuss against it then. Sorry to interrupt your package contribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 02:17:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189952] New: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/metapixel/metapixel.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/metapixel/metapixel-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Metapixel is a program for generating photomosaics. It can generate classical photomosaics, in which the source image is viewed as a matrix of equally sized rectangles for each of which a matching image is substitued, as well as collage-style photomosaics, in which rectangular parts of the source image at arbitrary positions (i.e. not aligned to a matrix) are substituted by matching images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 02:33:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189553] Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260233.k3Q2XQa3021970@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189553 jima at auroralinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at auroralinux.org ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-04-25 22:33 EST ------- Woo hoo, first review. Let's see... Good (I think?): MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest ([WWW] http://www.ioccc.org/). MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Bad: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Details: + Works with PHP5, contrary to your review request description. - User/group ownership is backward; is root:apache, should be apache:root (as per our discussion). Easy fix. Not sure if the rpmlint errors are acceptable; I'd like to hear from someone with more experience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 02:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260236.k3Q2a0Gs022650@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-25 22:35 EST ------- I'm seeing a build failure in mock; I think you need to BR: the GL development stuff: gcc -o ../../plugins/accel/wings_ogla_drv.so -I/usr/lib/erlang/usr/include \ wings_ogla_drv.c -shared -fpic -lGLU -lGL wings_ogla_drv.c:26:61: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory wings_ogla_drv.c:27:62: error: GL/glu.h: No such file or directory wings_ogla_drv.c:68: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:69: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:70: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:74: error: expected ')' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:82: error: expected ')' before 'flag' wings_ogla_drv.c:87: error: expected ')' before 'errorCode' wings_ogla_drv.c:95: error: expected ')' before 'coords' wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'wings_file_start': wings_ogla_drv.c:139: error: 'tess' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once wings_ogla_drv.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.) wings_ogla_drv.c:140: error: 'GLU_TESS_VERTEX' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:140: error: 'wings_ogla_vertex' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:141: error: 'GLU_TESS_EDGE_FLAG' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:141: error: 'wings_ogla_edge_flag' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:142: error: 'GLU_TESS_COMBINE' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:142: error: 'wings_ogla_combine' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:143: error: 'GLU_TESS_ERROR' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:143: error: 'wings_ogla_error' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'wings_file_stop': wings_ogla_drv.c:153: error: 'tess' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'control': wings_ogla_drv.c:163: error: 'GLfloat' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:163: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:163: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:171: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:182: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:191: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:198: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'triangulate': wings_ogla_drv.c:213: error: 'GLdouble' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:213: error: expected ';' before 'n' wings_ogla_drv.c:214: error: 'new_vertices' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:217: error: 'tess_coords' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:218: error: 'tess_alloc_vertex' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:227: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'memcpy' wings_ogla_drv.c:227: error: 'n' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:230: error: 'tess' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [../../plugins/accel/wings_ogla_drv.so] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 02:36:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189553] Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260236.k3Q2awSK022863@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189553 ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-04-25 22:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128233) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128233&action=view) Output from rpmlint Ah, guess I can attach and comment at tyhe same time. Oops. The fix I recommended only changes s/gid/uid/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 02:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189553] Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260238.k3Q2cKWk023150@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189553 jima at auroralinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128233|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 03:19:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260319.k3Q3JvoW031561@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From tmayberr at redhat.com 2006-04-25 23:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Updated package: > SRPM Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack- > audio-connection-kit-0.101.1-2.src.rpm > Spec Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack- > audio-connection-kit.spec > > * Mon Apr 24 2006 Andy Shevchenko > - disable oss and portaudio engines > - use /dev/shm as jack tmpdir > - remove capabilities stuff Looks good. I noticed BR: glib-devel in the spec are you sure this is needed? > Due to English isn't my native language could anybody help me with README. > Fedora? I'm attaching a rough README.Fedora but it should probably be verified for correctness, grammar, spelling etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 03:23:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260323.k3Q3NKWj032746@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From tmayberr at redhat.com 2006-04-25 23:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128234&action=view) Rough README.Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 03:26:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260326.k3Q3QlM0001307@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 tmayberr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128234|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 03:51:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189952] Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260351.k3Q3pMC6008879@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 04:03:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260403.k3Q43P7R011473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 tjikkun at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-04-26 00:03 EST ------- Thanks a lot the both of you, I will now add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 04:12:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189952] Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260412.k3Q4C2rL012646@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 00:11 EST ------- Issues: The manpage is executable for some reason. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included in the package. * source files match upstream: b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0 metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0 metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns no (non %doc) directories. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O No test suite, so no %check. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 04:19:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260419.k3Q4JYFL013750@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-04-26 00:19 EST ------- Updated to 0.2.4.3-2 to include small patch to rid the setup script of the unnecessary gconf stuff and also to fix some of the spacing inconsistencies in the spec. SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes-0.2.4.3-1.src.rpm Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes.spec Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 05:10:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260510.k3Q5AW7x020989@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-26 01:10 EST ------- For some reason I woke up (insane) early this morningL: 6 A.M. so i had some time to take a look. It turns out that one of your warning fixes in the -alias.patch caused the compile to fail on 64 bit. I've replaced this part of the -alias.patch with a new version. I'll attach the new -alias.patch. I only touched the gpsmap.cc chunck, so thats all you need to review. Also the 2 warnings on 64 bit are really a problem, I have a patch for those too, which I will attach also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 05:12:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260512.k3Q5C7st021291@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-26 01:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128236) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128236&action=view) Updated -alias patch which fixes compilation on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 05:14:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260514.k3Q5EMDw021661@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-26 01:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128237) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128237&action=view) Patch fixing 2 warnings (and real problems) on x84_64 With these 2 patches the package is ok. IOW approved! under the conditition that you agree with adding both patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 05:15:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260515.k3Q5FFq0021775@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 07:40:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260740.k3Q7eGKT014442@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128141|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-26 03:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128240) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128240&action=view) initng 0.6.2-1 spec file (In reply to comment #239) > * I think, the old vs. recent SELinux API check should be implemented > in the upstream package Since Dragoran's fix (thanks a lot for that one!) didn't make it into 0.6.2 I'll fix this in the spec for 0.6.3 when released. > * there should be appended a '|| :' to the > > | /usr/sbin/semanage ... > | /sbin/restorecon ... > > calls in %post and %postun, and perhaps '2>/dev/null' too. 'semanage' > is not available for FC4. Fixed. > * %postun is buggy; '/sbin/ldconfig' must be moved into the body: Did I get it right this time? (What was that "-p"?) > | rm -rf %{buildroot} _doc > ~~~~ Fixed. > * the > > | %post > | ... > | exit 0 > > is useless; No idea where that came from. Removed. > * not really wrong, but the '-r' flag can/should be omitted: Well, we might save one cpu cycle or two by removing it ;-) > * when you want a full review, then provide a complete .src.rpm. I'll do that as soon as someone tells me there will be any point with a full review. Judging by Ralf's comment about the package being "way off from being ready for a release", I guess there's no point really yet? > * how mature is the i-files syntax? When scripts will have to be > rewritten for e.g. 0.70, this will stop me from approving it... I'll pass this question on to upstreams ml. The syntax has changed a lot in the past, but it seems to have stabilized lately. > Resp.: when published now, can you guarantee, that > a) package follows upstream releases, and > b) a nightly 'smart update' to a new version will not bring the > system into an unusable state? A is no problem, I'll continue to release as I'm doing now (Only problem might be that I can't reach neither Fedoras build system nor cvs from work because of a corporate firewall, I'll have to do this from home instead). About B, I guess this means that I'll have to solve incompabilities that may arise using scriptlets in the spec file, right? > * when attaching spec files to the ticket, a 'text/plain' type shall > be assigned instead of 'application/octet-stream' Oh. I've always used the "auto-detect", I thought it was smart enough... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 07:50:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260750.k3Q7oEcZ017268@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-04-26 03:49 EST ------- Contact the reporter to let him know about your proposals. I will review the new spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189959] New: Review Request: mysql-query-browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189959 Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql-query-browser.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql-query-browser-1.1.18-3.fc5.src.rpm Description: MySQL Query Browser is a GUI tool for executing SQL queries. It will display the result in a list where you can edit its contents and save. It has several auxiliar features to facilitate work, such as query "bookmarking", query history, syntax highlighting and online help. It's part of the MySQL Developer Suite. ------------------------------ This is my first RPM proposal for extras. I provides some useful RPM on my little repo which i think most could/should be include in the Extras. This one is the companion of mysql-administror already in FE. Remi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:29:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260829.k3Q8T7MR026356@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 04:28 EST ------- $ rpmls.sh lilypond-2.8.1-2.x86_64.rpm | grep midi.so -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/lilypond/2.8.1/python/midi.so Executable bits missing, that's probably why it's not automatically stripped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:32:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260832.k3Q8WwLs027430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 04:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > Ouch. Though I haven't seen any xemacs-beta package for Debian yet Sorry for being unclear, by "xemacs-beta" I meant the xemacs-beta at xemacs.org mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:38:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189959] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260838.k3Q8c2g1029010@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189959 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 04:37 EST ------- Already submitted and review apparently in progress, see bug 187913. Please coordinate with folks in that bug and close this as a duplicate if appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:38:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260838.k3Q8crcr029288@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 04:38 EST ------- FE-NEW -> FE-REVIEW? Status is already "assigned". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:45:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189959] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260845.k3Q8j8gf031006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189959 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-26 04:45 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 187913 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260845.k3Q8jVxV031110@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-26 04:45 EST ------- *** Bug 189959 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:53:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260853.k3Q8rCaZ000330@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-26 04:53 EST ------- Okay, So were not going to use fedora-usermgnt and we're going to use seperate groups for: hack, sail and phantasia. Although this doesn't completly remove all security concerns (see fedora-games-list discussion) it does remove 99.9 % of them. Besides that these games are shipped by others (freebsd?) using sgid too, and lately a security alert was send out for hack. So it seems that others have taken a look at the sgid stuff too and found it acceptable to include and it seems that atleast one person has done some kinda auditing for this. So I say that putting hack, sail and phantasia in their own group is safe enough (notting is really 100% safe). Mike, Can you post a new version which drops the fedora-usermgt and has any other fixes you still want todo? IOW can you post a new version which is ready for a full review? Then I'll review it asap (which might not be so soon though). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:54:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189959] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260854.k3Q8snvq000719@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189959 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 08:58:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260858.k3Q8wWoE001578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-26 04:58 EST ------- Ping? I know licensing is no fun, but if you/we want this package in FE we need to sort this out. If you want me to I can contact the author and politely explain our problem to him and ask for a license change. I've done so successfully in the past, do a "yum install crystall-stacker" or "yum install worminator" and then look in /usr/share/doc/xxx to see the license change discussion, I've included the discussion in the packages because upstream hasn't released a new version with the new license included yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 09:52:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604260952.k3Q9qhi9011588@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-26 05:52 EST ------- I've decided to discuss how to best handle this on the fedora-games-list see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2006-April/msg00042.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 10:08:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 06:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261008.k3QA8HST014607@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-26 06:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > W: bugzilla non-conffile-in-etc /etc/httpd/conf.d/bugzilla.conf > > Safe to ignore. Why ignore it? Why not mark the file as %config(noreplace) instead, and shut rpmlint up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 10:17:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 06:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261017.k3QAHAZS015989@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |aalib ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-04-26 06:17 EST ------- * Wed Apr 26 2006 Andy Shevchenko - add README.Fedora - remove useless BRs Updated package: SRPM Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit-0. 101.1-3.src.rpm Spec Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit. spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 10:18:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 06:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261018.k3QAIgUn016313@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|aalib |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 10:24:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 06:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261024.k3QAOKkx017355@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128240|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-26 06:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128245) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128245&action=view) initng 0.6.3-1 spec file >From the changelog: - New upstream version - Removed selinux version check from spec, this is now upstreams - Hot reload initng in %post -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 11:10:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189952] Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261110.k3QBAJvZ025462@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-26 07:10 EST ------- Updated files are at http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/metapixel/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 11:26:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261126.k3QBQvpR028052@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-26 07:26 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint OK (only warning is gtkhtml36-devel no-documentation, ignorable) - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is part GPL, part LGPL; spec matches, GPL text included, LGPL text missing - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK in mock for FC5 (i386) and installs OK with gtkhtml3 present - BR's OK - %find_lang used appropriately - /sbin/ldconfig called properly in %post and %postun - not relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions OK, %defattr used properly - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - header files, pkgconfig file, and .so file properly placed in -devel subpackage - devel package requires same release of base package - libtool and static archives removed - library package, not app, so no desktop file - scriptlets are sane - Compared with gtkhtml3.spec revision 1.30 in CVS; changes are limited to those mentioned in %changelog Needswork: - include COPYING.LIB as %doc - Package needs to own %{_libdir}/gtkhtml (gtkhtml3 might not be installed) Suggestions: - Include BUGS as %doc - Use FE-standard buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Since patch2 is neither included in the SRPM nor applied, is there any point having it mentioned in the spec at all? Really picky nits: - "etc" (in summary for -devel) is an abbreviation and should be "etc." - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} better written as $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} since %{_libdir}'s expansion always starts with "/" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 11:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261128.k3QBSVnM028269@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: compat- |Review Request: gtkhtml36 |gtkhtml36 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 12:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261227.k3QCRd0r006615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 08:27 EST ------- just as an addition. someone posted a nice bsah-completion file on the initng mailinglist. works nicely for me and i guess some of you been waiting for beeing able to properly autocomplete ngc etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 12:33:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261233.k3QCX4QO008168@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-04-26 08:32 EST ------- I believe I've fixed all of the rpmlint issues above, but can't be certain as rpmlint continues to refuse to display those issues for me. Anyway, new packages here: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla-2.20.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 12:50:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261250.k3QCoDhF011597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 08:50 EST ------- you forgot to specify cmake as buildrequries in the latest 0.6.3 spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 12:53:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261253.k3QCr7NK012083@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 08:52 EST ------- RPATH Problem when building with cmake in a userbuild env: ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libhistory.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libnetprobe.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/liblockfile.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libfstat.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libcritical.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libsimplelauncher.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libreload.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libchroot.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libenvparser.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libpause.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libsyslog.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libstcmd.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libinitctl.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libfind.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src]ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/liblast.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src]ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/librlparser.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libdebug_commands.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/librunlevel.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libbashlaunch.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libunneeded.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libnge.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libinteractive.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libsyncron.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libalso.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src]ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libidleprobe.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/liblogfile.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libstdout.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libcpout.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libctrlaltdel.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libservice.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libconflict.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libsuid.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src]ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libdaemon.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libiparser.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/liblimit.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libchdir.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/librenice.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/sbin/nge' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/nge' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/nge] ERROR 0002: file '/sbin/nge_raw' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/nge' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/nge] ERROR 0002: file '/sbin/ngc' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/ngc4' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/ngc4:/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/nge] ERROR 0002: file '/sbin/ngc' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/nge' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/ngc4:/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/plugins/nge] ERROR 0002: file '/sbin/initng' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 12:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261257.k3QCvhB6012927@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 08:57 EST ------- initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1 needs initng-devel as buildrequires. if you do test builds with mock you wont miss such buildrequires problems in the future. sorry for the amount of posts... but since i tested cvs shortly before release i didnt expect that many problems to pop up... i still used autotools for building though back then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 13:05:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261305.k3QD5leB014570@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 09:05 EST ------- damn... another one... initng-0.6.3 %post scriptlet always fails if initng isnt installed. the scriptlet should only be executed at update not at install time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 13:27:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261327.k3QDR46x019286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 13:47:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261347.k3QDlHuG024835@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128245|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-26 09:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128252) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128252&action=view) initng 0.6.3-2 spec file - Only hot reload initng if there is a initng process - Add cmake back to buildrequires And yes, those rpath errors are back. Anyone knows what to do this time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 13:51:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261351.k3QDpU7Z025843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128142|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-26 09:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128253) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128253&action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1-2 spec file Added initng-devel to buildrequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:00:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261400.k3QE0joj028293@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 10:00 EST ------- thanks for your quick fixes. i have another 3 things that need fixing though: 1. initng-ifiles %post doesent generate the required files... the generate script actually only does something if the -all switch is used. 2. system/auditd doesent start because /etc/init.d/auditd doesent exist 3. and initng %post requires grubby to be installed. (post requires) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:10:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261410.k3QEALhQ030183@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-04-26 10:10 EST ------- OK - packages have now been built and are in the repo for FC5. devel packages not yet buildable due to upstream problem between muse and the beta version of xemacs that devel has moved to. According to the instructions, I should now close this bug as NEXTRELEASE, but that doesn't seem to be within my gift - perhaps Kevin can do that. Thanks to you all for your help and suggestions getting this through the review procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:13:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261413.k3QED7Ht030645@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 10:12 EST ------- #250: 2. audit wasnt installed on my fc5 test system (fresh install with updates) i have to look into that. not an initng problem really unless maybe of the runlevel gen... why did it add it when its not present. with all the stuff fixed above everything is running quite fine. one of the things i dont like though is the current iptables script in initng... maybe it would make sense to patch it to use the existing init scripts of the sysvinit for start and stop. would be better and easy to maintain. just a suggestion that has to be discussed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261420.k3QEKETG032618@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-04-26 10:20 EST ------- Fixed. The new files are at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-lxml.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-lxml-0.9.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:31:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261431.k3QEVnWM002805@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-26 10:31 EST ------- Bad: - Source should be a URL to the source - build root should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Good: - rpmlint is silent. - builds in mock for i386 / x86_64 Question: How usable is this for kernel building right now? There is some pushback to not have it in Core until it is actually usable/needed to build the kernel and that Extras would be a good place to put it until such time as it is needed. Your thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:35:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261435.k3QEZr23004885@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 10:35 EST ------- at some point of booting up initng output becomes russian for me. someone has to figure out what script triggers that. (probably wrong encoding?) it switches back at the end of the booting process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:53:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261453.k3QEr6Y8008971@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be 2006-04-26 10:52 EST ------- Nobody seems to know what causes this. I did some testing a while ago and it didn't seem to be used by any script. Perhaps the handling of terminal output by initng itself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:56:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261456.k3QEuGXX009578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be 2006-04-26 10:56 EST ------- I meant "...caused by any script..." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:58:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261458.k3QEw8eA010040@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-26 10:58 EST ------- Thanks for looking at this. (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install > - It is, isn't it? The spec file reads... %install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 14:58:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261458.k3QEwWnJ010116@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-04-26 10:58 EST ------- The source was obtained from FreeBSD's cvsweb. You can have a CVS pserver URL, or you can have the name of the tarball I prepared. I prefer the latter. Fixed buildroot in 1.171-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261502.k3QF22bK010881@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-04-26 11:01 EST ------- I committed a change to the rawhide kernel this morning which uses the new 'make headers_install' rules to generate kernel headers from the kernel tree. It's conditional, and turned off right now because it BuildRequires unifdef, which we don't have yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:04:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261504.k3QF45Mn011353@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 11:03 EST ------- #253: i will carry it upstream in a few hours. there must be a trivial cause of this. i am 80% sure its triggered by an ifiles script. going to try to figure out by which one because it always happens at the same point of booting (with my setup). one way to figure it out is to generate a bootchart. then i can see what switches there and what switches actually back. i can also share a trivial patch to the iptables script to use the sysvinit script as "backend". the next question is... shouldnt NetworkManager provide network so the bootprocess completes if its enabled? What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:08:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261508.k3QF8Gsg012477@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-26 11:08 EST ------- Frank, Please: -use "pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir" to get the location for dropping the PCSC-lite driver -add executable permission to all .so files .so files should always be 755 More even more improtant: -don't install the lib under the to generic name libctapi.so, this is asking for conflicts with other packages. Instead name it something like libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 (watch the versioning!) and put the ctapi lib part in plain %{_libdir} not the PSCS-lite readers dir, since its generic. -don't install ctapi.h (where is ctbcs.h?) in /usr/include, but put it in /usr/include/ctapi-cyberjack. -create a pkgconfig-file which can be used to get the correct CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to link against the cyberjack ctapi. Alternativly come up with some other scheme to allow multiple libctapi's to co-exist, I think you / we should be able to come up with something better, just taking the libctapi.so and ctapi.h names in the global namespace is unacceptable since for example the towitoko drivers provide the same. Once this is done I would mind sponsering you and doing a full review of this package, but this problem has to be tackled first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:11:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261511.k3QFBiCo013161@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-26 11:11 EST ------- Ah, good point about the source issue. Everything else looks good now, passes review. Please follow the next steps on the PackageListProcess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:29:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189952] Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261529.k3QFTp5J018425@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 11:29 EST ------- Thanks, looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:34:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] New: Review Request: partimage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 Summary: Review Request: partimage Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: dcantrel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dcantrel/core/partimage.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dcantrel/core/partimage-0.6.4-1.src.rpm Description: Partition Image is a Linux/UNIX partition imaging utility: it saves all used blocks in a partition to an image file. This image file can be compressed using gzip or bzip2 compression to save space, and even split into multiple files to be copied to movable media such as Zip disks or CD-R. The following partition types are supported: - Ext2FS (the Linux standard) - ReiserFS (a new, powerful journalling file system) - NTFS (Windows NT File System) - FAT16/32 (DOS & Windows file systems) - HPFS (OS/2 File System) This allows you to back up a full Linux/Windows system with a single operation. When problems such as viruses, crashes, or other errors occur, you just have to restore, and after several minutes your system can be restored (boot record and all your files) and fully working. This is also very useful when installing the same software on many machines: just install one of them, create an image, and just restore the image on all other machines. Then, after the first one, each machine installation can take just minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:43:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261543.k3QFhKtX023513@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-26 11:42 EST ------- I'll take this, but first do you have good justification for why this should be in Core vs Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 15:50:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261550.k3QFoJRY024846@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-04-26 11:50 EST ------- It was requested that we add this to our rescue CD, which makes sense to me. Partimage is pretty useful for recovery, backup, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:02:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189952] Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261602.k3QG2SxM027325@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-26 12:02 EST ------- Thx for the review. -> NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261620.k3QGKI3X030417@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-26 12:20 EST ------- x86_64 build issue: + rm -f /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/sbin/killall5 + mkdir _doc + mv /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng/gentoo-chart.png /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng/initng-chart.png /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng/initng.txt _doc/ + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile Processing files: initng-0.6.3-2 error: File not found by glob: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/libinitng.* error: File not found by glob: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/libngeclient.* error: File not found by glob: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/libngcclient.* error: File not found: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/initng Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.32939 + umask 022 + cd /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD + cd initng-0.6.3 + DOCDIR=/home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng-0.6.3 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng-0.6.3 + /bin/mkdir -p /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng-0.6.3 + cp -pr COPYING AUTHORS CODING_STANDARDS FAQ NEWS README TODO /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng-0.6.3 + cp -pr _doc/gentoo-chart.png _doc/initng-chart.png _doc/initng.txt /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/usr/share/doc/initng-0.6.3 + exit 0 Processing files: initng-devel-0.6.3-2 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: initng = 0.6.3-2 RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/libinitng.* File not found by glob: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/libngeclient.* File not found by glob: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/libngcclient.* File not found: /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/initng-0.6.3-2-root-dragoran/lib64/initng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:22:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261622.k3QGMg21031042@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-26 12:22 EST ------- hardcoding /lib/libinitng.* /lib/libngeclient.* /lib/libngcclient.* /lib/initng fixes it.. whats the clean why to do so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:23:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261623.k3QGNP57031231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-04-26 12:23 EST ------- So I am working on it. But with the PCSC-lite driver directory it fails, because pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir returns only empty. So the build will fail:( And the makefile try to install the driver at install -m 755 pcsc/libcyberjack_ifd.so '/var/tmp/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-4%{dist}-root-frankpkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir/libcyberjack_ifd.so.2.0.8' In the spec file I have written: %define readers_dir "pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:30:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261630.k3QGURNK000901@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-26 12:30 EST ------- /lib is hardcoded in the CMakeList.txt files... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:50:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261650.k3QGonC8005749@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:50:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-zip.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-zip-1.2.3-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Zip is an extension to create and read zip files. ---------------------------------------- This is my first RPM proposal for extras. I provides some useful RPM on my little repo which i think most could/should be include in the Extras. Remi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 16:55:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261655.k3QGtx68006790@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
| OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:02:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261702.k3QH2iTc008720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-04-26 13:02 EST ------- Tim, can you roll a new(er) srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:05:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261705.k3QH5qD8009165@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-26 13:05 EST ------- Updated packages without fedora-usermgmt, ready for a full review: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games-2.17-6.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:06:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261706.k3QH6Jkb009315@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-26 13:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128268) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128268&action=view) new spec file This spec file fixes the x86_64 build issues and the rpath issues. The only porblem that I have is that gen_system_runlevel does not seem to generate a runlevel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:08:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261708.k3QH8L2h009835@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 13:08 EST ------- Paul: The issue was simply that I didn't understand what rpmlint was trying to tell me. John: What rpmlint version are you running? I have rpmlint-0.76-1.fc5.noarch. I'll try another build as soon as my local mirror finishes updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261713.k3QHD3Yx010537@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-26 13:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > The issue was simply that I didn't understand what rpmlint was trying to tell me. rpmlint has a handy "-I" option if you don't know what it's complaining about: $ rpmlint -I non-conffile-in-etc non-conffile-in-etc : A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261726.k3QHQ22H013087@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat at redhat.com 2006-04-26 13:25 EST ------- Thanks for that. Two suggestions but otherwise looking good to me. Please add a BuildRequires python-setuptools as mock build fails without this. Suggest use of dist tag - but not necessary for acceptance Review: * built on fc5 - tested in v * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the python template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included * source files match upstream: 25e18d86050907f3a088550fe650f841 lxml-0.9.1.tgz 25e18d86050907f3a088550fe650f841 /home/pauln/tmp/lxml-0.9.1.tgz * rpmlint is silent. * BuildRequires sane, although not sufficient for mock. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * package contains code, not content. * documentation is relatively small , so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la files * not a GUI app so no .desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:34:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261734.k3QHYEUC015038@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From drees76 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 13:34 EST ------- Paul, I don't see those warnings when building here. Are you using different CFLAGS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 17:46:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261746.k3QHkT4H018188@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-04-26 13:46 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing the package. I could have sworn I'd added both the dist tag and BuildRequires, but that's why we have reviewers ;-). I've made the suggested changes and put up new files at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-lxml.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-lxml-0.9.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:01:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261801.k3QI15KJ021433@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-26 14:00 EST ------- Buildrequires for libGL-devel and libGLU-devel added: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/wings-0.98.32b-4.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:02:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261802.k3QI2wvm021945@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-26 14:02 EST ------- gen_system_runlevel -all does generate files but many services are missing and it fails to boot after udev because its trys to start udev a second time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:11:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261811.k3QIB18Y024457@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 14:10 EST ------- Notable rpmlint messages: E: kdebluetooth zero-length /usr/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps/khciconfig.png E: kdebluetooth zero-length /usr/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps/khciconfig.png The default hcid start/stop commands in the pairing dialog's file locations could be fixed by eg. this (although I'm not certain whether they're too useful in the first place): sed -i -e 's|/etc/init\.d/bluez-utils|/etc/init.d/bluetooth|' \ kdebluetooth/kbluetoothd/kcm_btpaired/pairedtab.cpp The default for the link key file isn't too useful either, but I don't know what would be better as the location in FC varies depending on the device id as in /var/lib/bluetooth//linkkeys gnome-bluetooth uses just "Application;System;" as the desktop entry categories for the menu icons, whereas the "Network" category in kdebluetooth's ones place the icons in "Internet". Consider doing a s/Network/System/ in kdebluetooth? The all-lowercase menu entry names look a bit silly and inconsistent with everything else IMHO, how about something like these instead: - kbluetoothd: Bluetooth Meta Server (or KBluetoothD) - kbtobexclient: Bluetooth OBEX Object Push client (or KbtOBEXClient) - kbtserialchat: Bluetooth Serial Chat (or KbtSerialChat) libirmcsynckonnector.so should probably be in the main package, no? Missing dependencies in -devel, from #includes in installed headers: qt-devel, bluez-libs-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:15:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261815.k3QIFRuw025946@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-26 14:15 EST ------- Please take the license text from www.gnu.org an poke the upstream to include a written license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:31:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261831.k3QIVAVD031268@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 pnasrat at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat at redhat.com 2006-04-26 14:30 EST ------- Thanks - builds and runs. Meets review criteria, moving to FE-ACCEPT >>> import lxml.etree >>> doc = lxml.etree.parse('example-tutorial-en.xml') >>> e = doc.xpath('//article[@id="example-tutorial"]') >>> e [ Review as above: * built on fc5 - tested working * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. Uses dist tag. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the python template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included * source files match upstream: 25e18d86050907f3a088550fe650f841 lxml-0.9.1.tgz 25e18d86050907f3a088550fe650f841 /home/pauln/tmp/lxml-0.9.1.tgz * BuildRequires are proper. * builds in mock * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * package contains code, not content. * documentation is relatively small , so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la files * not a GUI app so no .desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:36:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261836.k3QIaC10001231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 14:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > But with the PCSC-lite driver directory it fails, because > pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir returns only empty. You'll need pcsc-lite-devel >= 1.3.0 (which is available in >= FC5) for that, earlier versions don't have the usbdropdir variable. $ pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir /usr/lib64/pcsc/drivers > In the spec file I have written: > %define readers_dir "pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir" That can't work, try %(pkg-config ...) instead of the quotes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:40:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261840.k3QIexMu003078@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 14:40 EST ------- FWIW, I have a local (not really maintained anymore) package of 0.6.5beta2, maybe you'll find something useful worth adopting at http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/partimage-0.6.5-0.1.beta2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261843.k3QIhxlS004153@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 pnasrat at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnasrat at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat at redhat.com 2006-04-26 14:43 EST ------- Konstantin- are you interested in updating to 0.9.9.6 (not sure is it a devevl version or stable)? http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ctypes/ctypes-0.9.9.6.tar.gz?download Toshio are you still interested in reviewing? This will be in python 2.5 so it might be nice to have it in Extras beforehand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:50:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261850.k3QIo0Fe006022@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 14:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128270) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128270&action=view) Another specfile for cross checking Just a FYI, I have a local (not really maintained since 2.16, more or less blindly updated) package of this too, perhaps cross check if there's something useful worth adopting in it. Specfile attached, full SRPM at http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/bugzilla-2.20-0.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 18:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261856.k3QIuWSE008687@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-04-26 14:56 EST ------- Yeah, you included partimaged. I was torn on whether or not to include it. I'm not convinced it's a good idea, but maybe I'll rework mine and turn partimaged back on. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:29:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261929.k3QJT99o015430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-04-26 15:28 EST ------- ok. And how build I this with FC4?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:35:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261935.k3QJZv4d017298@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-04-26 15:35 EST ------- Paul: If you're volunteering to review if I say I'm too busy, I'll gladly let you take over :-) Otherwise, I can free up some weekend time to work on reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:40:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261940.k3QJeo0a019329@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat at redhat.com 2006-04-26 15:40 EST ------- I'm happy to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:45:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261945.k3QJjRti020399@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-26 15:45 EST ------- The simplest solution would be to blindly define readers_dir as %{_libdir}/pcsc/drivers in the FC4 specfile. That would work for FC5+ currently too, but there are no guarantees; querying it from pkg-config is the official upstream way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:47:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261947.k3QJldaT020765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-26 15:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Paul, I don't see those warnings when building here. Are you using different CFLAGS? It was a mock build for rawhide. I'll attach the build.log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:48:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604261948.k3QJmw8m021096@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-26 15:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128271) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128271&action=view) Log file mentioned in Comment #8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:56:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] New: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hexter-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hexter-dssi-0.5.9-1.src.rpm Description: hexter is a software synthesizer that models the sound generation of a Yamaha DX7 synthesizer. It can easily load most DX7 patch bank files, accept patch editing commands via MIDI sys-ex messages (ALSA systems only), and recreate the sound of the DX7 with greater accuracy than any previous open-source emulation (that the author is aware of....) hexter operates as a plugin for the Disposable Soft Synth Interface (DSSI). DSSI is a plugin API for software instruments (soft synths) with user interfaces, permitting them to be hosted in-process by audio applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 19:59:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] New: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi-20060122-1.src.rpm Description: WhySynth is a versatile softsynth which operates as a plugin for the Disposable Soft Synth Interface (DSSI). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 20:04:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262004.k3QK4Mmh025149@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-04-26 16:04 EST ------- Is it serious, real, critical showstopper? It wil enhance review period for another couple of weeks because of "upstream" being on vacation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 20:12:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262012.k3QKC25h027249@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-26 16:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Created an attachment (id=128234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128234&action=view) [edit] > Rough README.Fedora > I think this file is great, although it would be even better if it were word-wrapped at 78 columns or so. I've submitted 9 or 10 packages for review that depend on jack-audio-connection-kit in one way or another. Is there anything major holding up acceptance of this package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 20:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262016.k3QKGiI7028448@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-04-26 16:16 EST ------- Built in rawhide. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 20:21:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262021.k3QKLVJo029673@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ultimateevil.org 2006-04-26 16:21 EST ------- Hey guys, I'm still here. Unfortunately I had a hardware failure which left me disconnected from the rest of the world for a bit and also held my ssh key hostage. I just got a new laptop and rescued my data from the dead machine, and I'm just about ready to push up the update to this package. Please close this bug and let me know that it's ok for me to procede. Please feel free to contact me via regular email, I'll try to be as responsive as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 21:38:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262138.k3QLcv14016320@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-04-26 17:38 EST ------- Jesse, I've updated the partimage package now. Enabled partimaged in a subpackage, etc, stuff, whatever. Have a look and then let me know when I can move it to devel-cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 21:39:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187980] Review Request: cdogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262139.k3QLdVJ4016468@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187980 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-26 17:39 EST ------- I now get a 404 not found error when I try to access the spec file and src rpm now. Has it moved somewhere else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 21:45:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] New: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen-0.9.3-1.src.rpm Description: Hydrogen is an advanced drum machine for GNU/Linux. It's main goal is to bring professional yet simple and intuitive pattern-based drum programming. This package depends on jack-audio-connection-kit and liblrdf, both of which have been submitted to Extras recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:05:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262205.k3QM5xwV020728@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 drees76 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From drees76 at gmail.com 2006-04-26 18:05 EST ------- Sounds good, Jeff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262217.k3QMHCwC021508@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-26 18:16 EST ------- * rpmlint warnings: W: gcompris incoherent-version-in-changelog 7.4-2 7.4-1 W: gcompris-devel no-dependency-on gcompris ...plus some 'no documentation' warnings that you might be able to ignore. * gcompris-desktop.patch has the following line that should probably be removed: Only in gcompris-7.4: gcompris.desktop.in~ * Only builds on the devel branch due to missing libassetml for FC-5. * The icon in the .desktop files are missing the .png extension, but the icons in the icon directory end in .png. I'm looking at gnucap now, so I'll probably have more comments once I can actually install this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:19:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] New: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps-0.3.0-1.src.rpm Description: caps, the C Audio Plugin Suite, is a collection of highly refined LADSPA units capable of (and intended for) realtime operation. The suite includes DSP units emulating instrument amplifiers, stomp-box classics, versatile 'virtual analogue' oscillators, fractal oscillation, reverb, equalization and others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:21:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262221.k3QMLG7S021928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bugs.michael at gmx.net CC|bugs.michael at gmx.net | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:22:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262222.k3QMMNVa022084@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bugs.michael at gmx.net CC|bugs.michael at gmx.net | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:22:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262222.k3QMMWRK022117@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-26 18:22 EST ------- I get a number of rpmlint warnings similar to this: W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos2.cc ../d_mos2.cc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:26:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262226.k3QMQnnH022477@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-26 18:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128276) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128276&action=view) a patch for raptor-config I've started taking a first look at the other pending packages (jack, ardour,...), but here more rpm dependency hell is left: /usr/bin/raptor-config also includes lots of linker commands in its --libs option, which create unnecessary dependencies on many -devel packages. It would benefit from a patch just as done with the pkg-config file (see attachment). Then, package raptor-devel does not depend on all these -devel packages anymore when linking dynamically, and you can do the following to get rid of all the packages you don't depend on directly: --- raptor.spec.orig 2006-04-24 13:12:03.000000000 +0200 +++ raptor.spec 2006-04-27 00:31:30.000000000 +0200 @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ Summary: Libraries, includes etc to develop with Raptor RDF parser library Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: libxml2-devel, curl-devel, krb5-devel, libidn-devel, openssl-devel -Requires: zlib-devel, libxslt-devel, e2fsprogs-devel %description devel Libraries, includes etc to develop with Raptor RDF parser library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:29:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262229.k3QMTlSM022803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-26 18:29 EST ------- And after these changes (which you can apply in CVS) I have no further comments, as the package looks clean then and liblrdf built fine with it, too. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 22:52:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262252.k3QMqR0q025354@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-04-26 18:52 EST ------- > Perhaps this package should own > /usr/share/ladspa/rdf, and ladspa could own /usr/share/ladspa Common practice among packagers seems to be to _either_ require a package which owns the directories _or_ to own the directories yourself. Here, however, the file is installed from within the "examples" directory for rdf_uri load tests and is not required at run-time. At build-time it is not adjusted to be in sync with the plugins found in the "ladspa" package. In liblrdf there's also no run-time dependency on the LADSPA_RDF_PATH /usr/share/ladspa/rdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 23:19:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262319.k3QNJWDF027906@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174546 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2006-04-26 19:19 EST ------- Could you add a directory to store the project in the RPM during the next bump? The trac wiki you reference suggests /var/trac and that it probably needs to be owned by apache. Not everyone wants to store their project in /tmp. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 23:24:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262324.k3QNO0s5028471@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 19:23 EST ------- Paul: Yep, I know about -I; I just confused that message for something else. I guess I need to tighten the screws so that my brain won't fall out as often. Ville: Thanks for sending your spec; I took a look at it and there are some things that I personally like: Your handling of python and ruby shebang lines is nice and more comprehensive than trying to write patch files. You filter out some dependencies that John's packages don't. (*.pl, DBD::*). I hadn't started looking into that yet but I it will need to be done. To the package at hand: It builds; rpmlint still complains about four .cvsignore files. A quick find will get rid of those. rpmlint doesn't like not having any binaries in /usr/lib. Does anyone have any suggestions as to whether it's reasonable to keep the contrib stuff here? If not, where should it go? Perhaps /usr/share since there's no arch-dependent stuff there. I like the current docs split, although after more thought I wonder how much of that documentation is for the installer/configurer and how much is expected to be web-accessible. Will there be broken internal links if the -docs package isn't installed? And if the docs shouldn't be web-accessible, they should go into /usr/share/doc. Ville's package installs a crontab. I don't know enough about bugzilla to know if it really needs one, but if so then one should probably be installed with everything commented out. (An everything install shouldn't have crontabs and such running by default.) Ville's package restarts the web server. Is it a good idea to do this here? Ville's package has Requires for perl-Template-Toolkit, perl(Chart::Lines), perl(GD) and Perl(PatchReader) which aren't in this package. The Template-Toolkit is found by RPM, and GD is a dependency so that's taken care of. Chart::Lines and PatchReader are in extras already so they should probably be added as dependencies if Bugzilla will use them. It looks like the Requires: filter didn't run at all; I still those things in the final list. I think you need to escape the parentheses when you call sed, but you might also want to consider either emitting the script from the specfile as Ville does, or do some substitution on the script in order to get the proper value of %{__perl_requires} in there. It's not guaranteed to live in /usr/lib/rpm/perl_requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 26 23:56:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604262356.k3QNuGMj032260@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-26 19:56 EST ------- Thanks for the excellent review. I made all of the suggested and mandatory changes: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36-3.6.2-3.fc5.src.rpm http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 00:08:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270008.k3R08Ppx001112@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 20:08 EST ------- This one builds fine; thanks. Issues: rpmlint doesn't like the fact that you didn't include a changelog entry. I cannot fetch Source1; it looks like they've moved the file to sourceforge. I can get it from http://dl.sourceforge.net/wings/wings3d_manual1.6.1.pdf which I'll take to be the upstream. Most of the final size of the package is the manual, which I think qualifies as "large" and so should be split into a -docs package. Since it's not built from the main tarball, you could even build it from a separate srpm if you wanted. I don't know if you missed this comment earlier of if you decided against it, but it might be worth it to note that this package includes the POV exporter plugin since it's not part of the upstream source. There are tiny README files stuck in with the compiled code. They're kind of pointless; /usr/lib64/wings/plugins/autouv/README says "This directory contains Auto-UV." I guess they don't hurt anything but I'm not sure there's much point in packaging them. They certainly don't make sense as %doc. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. O license field matches the actual license. (The license is the same as erlang-esdl's, which is open source but doesn't strictly correspond to any particular license tag.) * license is open source-compatible and is included in the package. O source files match upstream (once I fix Source1): 11a55f0eb81261a84a29d05dd4afa999 wings-0.98.32b.tar.bz2 11a55f0eb81261a84a29d05dd4afa999 wings-0.98.32b.tar.bz2-srpm c01d19b4be79b647b8605dd32753da3a wings3d_manual1.6.1.pdf c01d19b4be79b647b8605dd32753da3a wings3d_manual1.6.1.pdf-srpm 791ec96aefb43ca63800324a115e99c6 wingspov-0.98.28_v1.tgz 791ec96aefb43ca63800324a115e99c6 wingspov-0.98.28_v1.tgz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). X rpmlint complains about the changelog entry * final provides and requires are sane. * shared libraries are present but not in standard locations so there's no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present (no test suite upstream) * code, not content. X documentation is large; a -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * a GUI app. desktop file is included, looks OK and is properly installed with desktop-file-install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 01:51:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270151.k3R1pH0p009875@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 21:51 EST ------- I want to review this, but I cannot get the upstream sources. The URL in the specfile gives me back HTML and I can't find a download link for an upstream tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 02:08:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270208.k3R28KWi011115@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: An SMTP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165932 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 02:10:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270210.k3R2A2JM011335@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 22:10 EST ------- I was going to review this, but then I noticed the gecko-sharp2 package in core. It has the exact same readme as this package, and the changelog for this package stops in 2004 whereas the core package is developed at least into 2005. Does the the package which depends on this one not work with the more recent gecko-sparp package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 02:29:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187980] Review Request: cdogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270229.k3R2Tffo013849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187980 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-26 22:29 EST ------- The packager has indicated to me via email that he is unable to continue to maintain this package. Closing as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 03:10:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270310.k3R3AcH9020845@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-26 23:10 EST ------- David isn't as interested in maintaining this anymore, so I've gone ahead and pushed it through. It should wind up in extras-development soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 03:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270346.k3R3kUQU026697@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-04-26 23:46 EST ------- I'm currently seriously swamped at work. If someone wants to take over this one for me, I'd be more than happy to give up the reigns. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 03:51:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270351.k3R3pWJw027249@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-26 23:51 EST ------- Package fails to build in mock (development, both i386 and x86_64): RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/gauche-0.8.7-1-root-mockbuild/usr/share/info/* I added a BR: for texinfo and all is well. rpmlint complains: W: gauche file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/gauche-refe.info-3.gz Normally we fix these up with a call to iconv, but I'm not sure how to handle this problem in a multilingual texinfo file (Japanese and English are included in the same source file; these are postprocessed to produce the proper texi output.) Looking deeper, I see that in this particular file some Japanese has leaked into the English text; I think the cause is on line 8051 of modgauche.texi; the "@c COMMON" should be "@c JP", and the following "@c JP" should be "@c COMMON". E: gauche-debuginfo non-readable /usr/src/debug/Gauche-0.8.7/ext/sxml/sxml-sxpath.c 0600 (and many similar lines) The build process is creating these intermediate files: /tmp/Gauche-0.8.7> find . -name sxml-sxpath.c -ls 197853 708 -rw------- 1 tibbs users 719935 Apr 26 22:39 ./ext/sxml/sxml-sxpath.c which should probably be mode 644. I see some makefiles setting umask, but it's happening in a subshell so it shouldn't be leaking out. I don't understand why they're making it into the debuginfo package, but if the permissions were correct rpmlint would at least be quiet. E: gauche-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Technically since there's nothing system-dependent in there, it could live in /usr/share. Not knowing Gauche, I don't know what these files are used for; gcc for example stores plenty of development files in /usr/lib that are used by the compiler (and has no -devel package as well). I don't think this is a blocker. W: gauche-devel doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gauche-devel-0.8.7/template.DIST /bin/sh This file should not be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 04:02:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189830] Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270402.k3R423Gt027905@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189830 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xmms- |Review Request: xmms- |scrobber - Audioscrobbler |scrobber - Audioscrobbler |plugin for XMMS |plugin for XMMS Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-27 00:01 EST ------- Bad: - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Question: - Will your defatter make the docs files be installed with 0755 permissions? If so, this isn't right. Haven't tested mock building or rpmlint, will check tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 05:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270542.k3R5gWGd004321@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-27 01:42 EST ------- rpmlint output: E: gnucap configure-without-libdir-spec - The configure script was not created by autoconf, and does not respond to a --libdir flag. W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos2.cc ../d_mos2.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos4.cc ../d_mos4.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos6.cc ../d_mos6.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos1.cc ../d_mos1.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos7.cc ../d_mos7.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos5.cc ../d_mos5.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos3.cc ../d_mos3.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_bjt.cc ../d_bjt.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos.cc ../d_mos.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_diode.cc ../d_diode.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos_base.cc ../d_mos_base.cc W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos123.cc ../d_mos123.cc - The build system compiles against symlinks to the actual source files, which seems to confuse rpmbuild when it creates the debuginfo package. You might try using hardlinks instead of softlinks to work around this. MUST ==== * Package and spec file named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * spec file legible and in Am. English * Sources match upstream: 0d346f02a38c544fda6f8d7ec4f8b45e gnucap-0.34.tar.gz * Compiles and builds in mock on: FC4-i386, FC4-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64 * No excessive BR: * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Does not create any directories that it should own * No duplicate %files * %clean ok * Contains code, not content * %doc ok * No -devel package needed * No .desktop file needed QUESTIONS ========= * There seems to be two home pages for gnucap. The one listed in the spec file at www.gnu.org lists 0.31 as the most recent version. But a similarly looking page at http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gnucap shows 0.34. Why the two home pages? MUSTFIX ======= * Add %{?_smp_mflags} to 'make'. Intial tests show that it builds fine with this flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 06:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270605.k3R65TOd006109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128253|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-04-27 02:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128285) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128285&action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1-3 spec file (In reply to comment #250) > 1. initng-ifiles %post doesent generate the required files... > the generate script actually only does something if the -all switch is used. I really wonder why that was changed. Well, I'll add -all to it then... > 3. and initng %post requires grubby to be installed. (post requires) Check again. Grubby is run from %triggerin -- mkinitrd now. (In reply to comment #251) > #250: 2. audit wasnt installed on my fc5 test system (fresh install with > updates) i have to look into that. not an initng problem really unless maybe of > the runlevel gen... why did it add it when its not present. Hmmm... I thought audit was one of those fundamental things that was installed on all recent fedora systems? (In reply to comment #252) > at some point of booting up initng output becomes russian for me. someone has > to figure out what script triggers that. (probably wrong encoding?) it switches > back at the end of the booting process. This one is really a pain in the ass. I tried hard to fix it a while back (check #84 above) without any success. You could try running with "interactive" on the grub prompt, I guess it would make it easier to determine where the problem is. (In reply to comment #259) > This spec file fixes the x86_64 build issues and the rpath issues. Is this really a good idea? Hardcoding stuff in our spec file because they're hardcoded upstreams? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 06:34:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270634.k3R6YVwu008781@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174546 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-27 02:34 EST ------- FWIW, the default httpd.conf snippet in the package suggests /srv/trac and the tools default to /srv/svn for the subversion location, maybe the Wiki should be just changed to reflect those locations instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 06:37:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187980] Review Request: cdogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270637.k3R6bEUB009221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187980 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 06:39:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270639.k3R6dUat009627@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 06:58:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270658.k3R6wBPv011328@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 02:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128286) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128286&action=view) Improbed specfile (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint output: > E: gnucap configure-without-libdir-spec > > - The configure script was not created by autoconf, and does not > respond to a --libdir flag. > > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos2.cc ../d_mos2.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos4.cc ../d_mos4.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos6.cc ../d_mos6.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos1.cc ../d_mos1.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos7.cc ../d_mos7.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos5.cc ../d_mos5.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos3.cc ../d_mos3.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_bjt.cc ../d_bjt.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos.cc ../d_mos.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_diode.cc ../d_diode.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos_base.cc ../d_mos_base.cc > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos123.cc ../d_mos123.cc > > - The build system compiles against symlinks to the actual source files, which > seems to confuse rpmbuild when it creates the debuginfo package. You might > try using hardlinks instead of softlinks to work around this. > I noticed this too, this also came up during a review by me of kismet which generates the same warnings. We (I and the kismet packager) concider this an rpmbuild bug and have bugzilla'd it, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189928 > QUESTIONS > ========= > * There seems to be two home pages for gnucap. The one listed in the > spec file at www.gnu.org lists 0.31 as the most recent version. But > a similarly looking page at http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gnucap > shows 0.34. Why the two home pages? > I noticed this too, it seems that gnucap @ gnu is dead, and that the geda project has taken it over. > MUSTFIX > ======= > * Add %{?_smp_mflags} to 'make'. Intial tests show that it builds fine > with this flag. > Hmm, unfortunatly I don't remember if I left that out on purpose or by accident, since there is no comment about it (there is in gcompris.spec) I'll assume it was left out by accident and have put it in, this builds fine for me too. As usual during CET office hours I'm behind a machine which doesn't have upload access to my homepage, so I've attached the modified specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 07:04:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270704.k3R74J8L011886@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 03:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * rpmlint warnings: > W: gcompris incoherent-version-in-changelog 7.4-2 7.4-1 My bad I added a changelog entry for my changes but forgot to bump Release: I will fix this (easy). > W: gcompris-devel no-dependency-on gcompris Thats because it depends on gcompris-libs, where the actual libs are thats what you get with program and libs (and data) in one _big_ upstream tarbal. > ...plus some 'no documentation' warnings that you might be able to ignore. > gcompris comes with plenty of documentation in the main package in a lot of languages, so yes I intend to ignore these :) > * gcompris-desktop.patch has the following line that should probably be removed: > Only in gcompris-7.4: gcompris.desktop.in~ > Thats because I used diff not gendiff to generate the diff, this is totaly harmless, but I can remove it if it makes you happy. > * Only builds on the devel branch due to missing libassetml for FC-5. > My grand master plan was / is to ask for a FC-5 cvs branch for libassetml, gnucap and gcompris all at the same time. > * The icon in the .desktop files are missing the .png extension, but the icons > in the icon directory end in .png. > Other .desktop files have this too (gsview for example) it works fine either way,but my desktop patch did screw up the .desktop translations, so I have to fix that anyways, I can also add the .png at the same time if you want, but that would be unnescesarry deviation from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 07:32:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177619] Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270732.k3R7W8AD016362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177619 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-27 03:32 EST ------- Updated. http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-nltk-lite-0.6.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 07:48:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270748.k3R7mwkM020478@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-27 03:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Is it serious, real, critical showstopper? It wil enhance review period for > another couple of weeks because of "upstream" being on vacation. No, it's not a blocker. It's a "SHOULD" in the package review guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 07:51:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270751.k3R7pJPd020918@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-27 03:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Hey guys, I'm still here. Unfortunately I had a hardware failure which left me > disconnected from the rest of the world for a bit and also held my ssh key > hostage. I just got a new laptop and rescued my data from the dead machine, and > I'm just about ready to push up the update to this package. Please close this > bug and let me know that it's ok for me to procede. > > Please feel free to contact me via regular email, I'll try to be as responsive > as possible. Jeff, are you going to fix the issue raised in Comment #5 with the update? You'll need to remove the package from the OrphanedPackages page on the wiki too if you haven't already done so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 08:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270841.k3R8fCDi029586@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 04:40 EST ------- It's the same package, just has a different name. I'll close this request and reopen if I find differently -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 09:22:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270922.k3R9Mmal002801@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |aalib ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-04-27 05:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) I've fixed after comment this issue. Please, review last update at: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit-0. 101.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 09:25:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270925.k3R9PVnP003191@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|aalib |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 09:37:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] New: Review Request: php-pear-Mail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail-1.1.10-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: PEAR's Mail package defines an interface for implementing mailers under the PEAR hierarchy. It also provides supporting functions useful to multiple mailer backends. Currently supported backends include: PHP's native mail() function, sendmail, and SMTP. This package also provides a RFC822 email address list validation utility class. ------ One important thing is that this extension (as HTML, Net_SMTP, Net_Socket and XML_Parser) was included until php-5.0.4 in FC4. So it's needed for backward compatibility of Fedora Core >= 5. I'll will wait for feddback for this extension but spec for the others are ready. Remi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 09:44:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604270944.k3R9i55C006444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-04-27 05:44 EST ------- The reason I'm doing this package in the first place was to fill a dependency for the blam news reader (#187621) which doesn't build with the gecko-sharp2 package. I'm sure blam can be patched to use gecko-sharp2, but that's work that should happen upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 10:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 06:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] New: Review Request: par2cmdline Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline-0.4-5.src.rpm Description: par2cmdline is a program for creating and using PAR2 files to detect damage in data files and repair them if necessary. It can be used with any kind of file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 10:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 06:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271037.k3RAbnj5014880@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 06:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128297) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128297&action=view) improved specfile Here is an improved specfile, this fixes the changelog <-> version warning. I've dropped the desktop.in patch as that breaks .desktop file translations and replaced this with 2 sed commands, which are run at the end of %build, thus after the translations have been merged into the desktop files. It turns out that the upstream .desktop files do have .png at the end for the icons, and I no longer remove this :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 10:45:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 06:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] New: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jamatos at fc.up.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/dvipost.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/dvipost-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: dvipost - a latex post filter command to support change bars and overstrike mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271115.k3RBFL6t019716@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-04-27 07:15 EST ------- I was not completly satisfied with the resulting package so I have a new versio available: * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jos? Matos - 1.1-2 - Add new entries to %%doc and expand description Spec URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/dvipost.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/dvipost-1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:29:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271129.k3RBTbFO021889@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-04-27 07:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * Could you update the package to ghc-6.4.2? Yep, I updated the package with some changes: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/ghc-gtk2hs.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10-2.src.rpm > * BuildRoot must be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Fixed. > * Is the epoch necessary for mozilla version? Yes. > * I think PreReq should simply be Requires I prefer PreReq for post/preun requirements: it is equivalent to Requires actually, but if you object I can change it. > * ghclibdir should probably %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version} Well ghc upstream has said that %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version} should be reserved for ghc itself. For cabalised packages I'm using %{_libdir}/ghc as the library prefix: it would be good if gtk2hs followed this scheme too IMHO. I hear upstream is planning to make the install configuration more flexible, but for now maybe the current location is good enough. > * Can you explain your system of versioning? You mean the package naming scheme? That is a bit of a long story. :) This is the naming scheme I have been using for a while for libraries and ghc in Fedora Haskell . Let me try to summarize here. The starting point is the fact that ghc changes ABI with every minor version update (this is the main reason for the ghcXYZ subpackaging of ghc: ie currently there is ghc, ghc642, ghc642-prof); so since ghc is rather a large package to rebuild as a compat- package say it seemed to make more sense to me to allow parallel installs of ghcXYZ's (so you can install ghc641 with ghc642, etc and still be able to compile with your old libraries built for ghc641 say) until you can update them to ghc642. While gtk2hs builds quicker than ghc it is still pretty time-consuming to build, so following the ghc scheme it is subpackaged for ghcXYZ. I decided to make subpackages for each ghc package (gtk, glib, sourceview, etc) since they depend on the corresponding {gtk2,glib2,sourceview}-devel packages and so people can just install what they need: probably ghcXYZ-gtk would be most common. Again this allows parallel installs of libraries (gtk2hs) for parallel installs of ghc. Does that make some sense? I can go into more details if you wish. In the latest naming scheme now I'm just using the ghc-package name to name the subpackages (ghcXYZ-glib rather than ghc642-gtk2hs-glib etc) since that is what the ghc package is actually called so it seems more natural. The ghcXYZ scheme also means that if you have say ghc641-gtk installed with ghc-6.4.1, you can upgrade to ghc-6.4.2 without breaking the deps for ghc641 libs like gtk2hs, and then later update to ghc642-gtk when it is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:42:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188946] Review Request: contacts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271142.k3RBgptW024594@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188946 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-27 07:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > David isn't as interested in maintaining this anymore, so I've gone ahead and > pushed it through. It should wind up in extras-development soon. I see from owners.list that you've taken over ownership of this package yourself (which is good). Reading the above, it could be interpreted as pushing through an already-orphaned package (which wouldn't have been good). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:44:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271144.k3RBiDxi024830@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ultimateevil.org 2006-04-27 07:44 EST ------- Ok, removed from OrphanedPackages. I do see this error when building on FC5. I know upstream is preparing a new release, hopefully this will be corrected. I don't know how to fix this error myself. Is it still ok to schedule a build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271152.k3RBqkwY025765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mpeters at mac.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 07:52 EST ------- I'll review this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:55:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271155.k3RBtPfJ026139@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-27 07:55 EST ------- Here is a patch to make rpmlint happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271156.k3RBuWkT026365@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-27 07:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128299) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128299&action=view) cleanings for rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:56:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271156.k3RButjY026438@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-27 07:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks for the excellent review. > I made all of the suggested and mandatory changes: > > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36-3.6.2-3.fc5.src.rpm > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36.spec Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 11:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271157.k3RBvhAp026617@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-04-27 07:57 EST ------- So I have build an new spec file. I think I have do all needed changes. I have alos fix the readers config file. And the spec file can now be used for FC4 and FC5. here the URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack.spec?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 12:05:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271205.k3RC5cqh027581@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 08:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=128299) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128299&action=view) [edit] > cleanings for rpmlint > -Requires(post): /usr/bin/texhash -Requires(pre): /usr/bin/texhash What is the purpose of that? I know texhash is supplied by tetex-fonts which is required by tetex, and that any tetex install is going to have to have texhash, but I personally think it is a good idea to explicitly require what is run the post/postun scripts. Other changes in the patch are good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 12:14:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271214.k3RCECnw028516@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 08:14 EST ------- mock build error: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/dvipost-1.1-2.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/share/ texmf/tex/latex/misc/* It seems that in mock, it can't identify the TEXMF and installs it into dvipost-1.1-2.fc5-root-mockbuild./ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 12:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189830] Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271218.k3RCIfwv029000@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189830 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-27 08:18 EST ------- Updated files at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/xmms-scrobbler/ The permission issue is fixed as well as it came from the template-spec I copied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 12:21:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271221.k3RCLoPY029327@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-04-27 08:21 EST ------- The purpose of texhash is to create an hash with .sty files paths archived. That is why we need to run it after installing and after removing it. In general I agree with you, but in this case the relation between tetex and tetex-fonts is such that I don't expect ever to able to run tetex without tetex-fonts (famous last words ;-). In reply to #4, Patrice I have incorporated your patch in release 3. In reply to #6 /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/misc/ belongs to tetex-latex, so better requiring it for building and install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 12:23:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271223.k3RCNAIi029534@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-27 08:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Ok, removed from OrphanedPackages. > > I do see this error when building on FC5. I know upstream is preparing a new > release, hopefully this will be corrected. I don't know how to fix this error > myself. Is it still ok to schedule a build? Up to you. I'd push upstream to look at this sooner rather than later though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 12:27:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271227.k3RCRQmu030100@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 08:27 EST ------- >From the makefile inside the mock build - # Directory to install LaTeX styles LATEX= $(DESTDIR). which is incorrect. -=- This is how configure does it: if texpath=`kpsewhich latex.ltx 2>/dev/null` then kpseflag="" elif texpath=`kpsewhich tex latex.ltx 2>/dev/null` then kpseflag="-DKPSEWHICH_NEED_TYPE" else texpath="."; kpseflag="" fi texpath=`echo $texpath | sed -e 's%/[^/][^/]*/[^/]*$%/misc%'` if test "$texpath" = "." then echo "$ac_t"""broken"" 1>&6 elif test "$kpseflag" != "" then echo "$ac_t""kpsewhich needs type" 1>&6 else echo "$ac_t""ok" 1>&6 fi latex.ltx is tetex-latex - which is probably why the mock build failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 12:36:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271236.k3RCaeep031810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-04-27 08:36 EST ------- * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jos? Matos - 1.1-3 - Capitalize Summary, fix spell error in description, rework invocation of post and postun calls (thanks to Patrice Dumas) - Add tetex-latex to Requires and BuildRequires. - Add tetex-fonts to Requires to satisfy direct dependency on texhash Spec URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/dvipost.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/dvipost-1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 13:16:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271316.k3RDGW2v004762@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 09:16 EST ------- Good: md5sum matches upstream : 2ec79283a8348312bc72831ca80ae3a2 dvipost.tar.gz Builds in mock (fc5 x86) rpmlint clean on all packages spec file written in proper English spec file easy to read and understand cleanly installs and removes w/ no unowned directories spec file name matches package name consistent use of macros Appropriate license (GPL), matches package COPYING file. Package works. Suggestions (non blocking): 1) The spec file explicitly specifies /usr/share/texmf in the %files. That is the location in every fedora install - but some other spec files detect the texmfmain directory in a macro and use that instead. If a user has for whatever reason changed their texmfmain - the src.rpm would have a build error when rebuilt. 2) The html documentation might want to placed into texmf/doc somewhere so that texdoc dvipost will launch a browser window to the documentation. Question: >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines ---- If a new package is considered an "addon" package that enhances or adds a new functionality to an existing Fedora Core or Fedora Extras package without being useful on its own, its name should reflect this fact. The new package ("child") should prepend the "parent" package in its name, in the format: %{parent}-%{child}. ---- Since this package isn't useful without tetex, and is used in conjunction with tetex, should it be called tetex-dvipost ? -=- Misc suggestion for upstream - filter out the cgi-bin references in the man2html conversion of the man page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 13:37:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271337.k3RDbUr6009244@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 09:37 EST ------- > I'm sure blam can be patched to use gecko-sharp2, but that's work that > should happen upstream. Well, it's work that should coordinate with upstream. If it's a simple fix, there's no reason not to make it and carry the patch until upstream incorporates it if it lets us avoid adding what is essentially a dead package into extras. That said, there's certainly precedent for keeping in extras old packages that have been superceded by incompatible versions in core. (See gtk+.) But it's worth at least asking upstream to see what their plans are and what they recommend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 13:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190086] New: Review Request: rman Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190086 Summary: Review Request: rman Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mpeters at mac.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/rman.spec SRPM URL: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/rman-3.2-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Parse formatted man pages and man page source from most flavors of UNIX. Convert to HTML, ASCII, TkMan, DocBook, and other formats. -=- This is hands down the best man to html converter I personally have ever used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 13:55:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190090] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: krzyko at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:14:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271414.k3REE59n016843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ultimateevil.org 2006-04-27 10:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Up to you. I'd push upstream to look at this sooner rather than later though. Ok, I'm gonna get the build out there as soon as I can, and I'll notify the developer list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271419.k3REJdA6017852@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-27 10:19 EST ------- Bad: - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Server requires should probably be %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - Doesn't build on x86_64: fs_xfs.h:115: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef long long int __int64_t' /usr/include/bits/types.h:47: error: '__int64_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef long int __int64_t' fs_xfs.h:116: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef long long unsigned int __uint64_t' /usr/include/bits/types.h:48: error: '__uint64_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef long unsigned int __uint64_t' make[4]: *** [fs_xfs.o] Error 1 rpmlint isn't very happy w/ the 32bit package either. W: partimage conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/partimage W: partimage conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/partimage E: partimage use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimage E: partimage use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimage W: partimage-server conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/logrotate.d/partimaged W: partimage-server conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/partimaged W: partimage-server conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/partimaged E: partimage-server non-readable /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers 0600 E: partimage-server executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/partimaged E: partimage-server incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/partimaged W: partimage-server file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/en/man5/partimagedusers.5.gz W: partimage-server file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/en/man8/partimaged.8.gz W: partimage-server incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/partimaged $prog W: partimage-server incoherent-init-script-name partimaged E: partimage-server use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimaged E: partimage-server use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimaged E: partimage-server use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimaged Indifferent: - %description is a bit long winded... - chmod of pam.d/partimaged followed by install -m seems redundant. NEEDSWORK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:23:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271423.k3RENiQ7018684@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-27 10:23 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-kmod-1.2.5-3.2.6.16_1.2157_FC6.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-kmod-1.2.5-1.2.5-3.2.6.16_1.2157_FC6.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.5-3 - Update zaptel-ztdummy-250hz.diff.txt with fixes from Andy Kwong -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271437.k3REbuBw022455@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-04-27 10:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Good: > > md5sum matches upstream : 2ec79283a8348312bc72831ca80ae3a2 dvipost.tar.gz > Builds in mock (fc5 x86) > rpmlint clean on all packages > spec file written in proper English > spec file easy to read and understand > cleanly installs and removes w/ no unowned directories > spec file name matches package name > consistent use of macros > Appropriate license (GPL), matches package COPYING file. > Package works. > > Suggestions (non blocking): > 1) The spec file explicitly specifies /usr/share/texmf in the %files. > That is the location in every fedora install - but some other spec files detect > the texmfmain directory in a macro and use that instead. > > If a user has for whatever reason changed their texmfmain - the src.rpm would > have a build error when rebuilt. Something like: %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")} > 2) The html documentation might want to placed into texmf/doc somewhere so that > texdoc dvipost will launch a browser window to the documentation. That makes sense but then it would imply to Require: tetex-doc. That would mean that a 40 KB package could potencially require an 100 MB package. I don't think this is worth it. :-) > Question: > > From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines > ---- > If a new package is considered an "addon" package that enhances or adds a new > functionality to an existing Fedora Core or Fedora Extras package without being > useful on its own, its name should reflect this fact. > > The new package ("child") should prepend the "parent" package in its name, in > the format: %{parent}-%{child}. > ---- > > Since this package isn't useful without tetex, and is used in conjunction with > tetex, should it be called tetex-dvipost ? Actually I think that dvipost requires a tex installation, there is nothing exclusive from tetex. That was the reason why I have proposed dvipost and not tetex-dvipost. If you feel strongly about this I will rename it. > -=- > Misc suggestion for upstream - filter out the cgi-bin references in the man2html > conversion of the man page. I agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271444.k3REin8D024089@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-27 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > APPROVED Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:44:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271444.k3REiZ1s024035@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 10:44 EST ------- Issues: spectool cannot fetch the upstream source; your Source: URL is wrong. I think it should be http://dl.sourceforge.net/parchive/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, which I'll assume is the proper upstream. To help those of us who won't understand why we would need this software, could you perhaps include a quick description of a PAR2 file in %description? Please use the recommended BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Please remove Distribution: SuSE 9.1. I'm not sure about your Obsoletes: and Provides:, but I'll assume you have some previous package history that requires this. I'll ask the list for a bit of guidance. rpmlint complains: E: par2cmdline-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/par2cmdline-0.4/par2repairersourcefile.h E: par2cmdline-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/par2cmdline-0.4/par2repairer.cpp E: par2cmdline-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/par2cmdline-0.4/galois.h E: par2cmdline-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/par2cmdline-0.4/par2repairersourcefile.cpp E: par2cmdline-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/par2cmdline-0.4/par1repairer.cpp You should remove the executable bits from these files in %build; otherwise RPM thinks they're executables and sticks them in the debuginfo package. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X specfile is properly named but the preamble needs minor cleanup. %prep and below look good. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and is included in the package as %doc. * source files match upstream: 1551b63e57e3c232254dc62073b723a9 par2cmdline-0.4.tar.gz 1551b63e57e3c232254dc62073b723a9 par2cmdline-0.4.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint has a few complaints X final requires are sane; final provides * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * creates no non-%doc directories. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check not present; no test suite upstream. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:45:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271445.k3REj2PR024160@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 Bug 189315 depends on bug 189309, which changed state. Bug 189309 Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 14:45:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271445.k3REjI8i024235@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 Bug 189313 depends on bug 189309, which changed state. Bug 189309 Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 15:06:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271506.k3RF6tPR028167@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 11:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Something like: > > %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo > `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")} Well, except that defining _texmf would in this case cause an error as well unless configure was patched to take it as an arguement (which I don't think is necessary) - I guess in this case expecting to support building against modified tetex environments might be a bit much because of the upstream configure script which looks for a specific file and doesn't take a texmf as a switch. > > That makes sense but then it would imply to Require: tetex-doc. That would > mean that a 40 KB package could potencially require an 100 MB package. I don't > think this is worth it. :-) /usr/bin/texdoc is owned by tetex. The potential problem is who owns the directories within the tex documentation tree if tetex-doc isn't installed - but other packages just own it themselves. Since it is just the man page, and available as a man page, it isn't that big of a deal. > > Actually I think that dvipost requires a tex installation, there is nothing > exclusive from tetex. That was the reason why I have proposed dvipost and not > tetex-dvipost. > > If you feel strongly about this I will rename it. On fedora - tetex is what provides tex. There are other examples of this (in core) [mpeters at atlantis Desktop]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/dvips tetex-dvips-3.0-17 [mpeters at atlantis Desktop]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/xdvi tetex-xdvi-3.0-17 It also makes it a little easier to find when browsing repoview for tetex boltons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 15:31:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271531.k3RFVN5D032536@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 11:31 EST ------- Also, the current version seems to be 2.1; there are what look to be serious security implications for any version older than 2.1. (Sorry for spamming, but I was starting on a review when I noticed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 15:34:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180300] Review Request: ccrtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271534.k3RFYEM9000994@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccrtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180300 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|openvpn |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 15:38:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271538.k3RFcRRP002067@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-27 11:38 EST ------- You may be able to download the current CPL text from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt and add is to your package. Then you may poke the upstream to include a verbatin copy of the license in the upstream package. When this may be happen, you can create an updated version of your package, which use the text from the upstream package instead of the text from www.gnu.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 15:41:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271541.k3RFfNLl002683@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-04-27 11:41 EST ------- What about: %changelog * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jos? Matos - 1.1-4 - Rename package to tetex-dvipost Spec URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tetex-dvipost.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tetex-dvipost-1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 15:55:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189830] Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271555.k3RFtOUZ005365@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189830 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-04-27 11:55 EST ------- Changes look good, rpmlint is silent, builds on i386/x86_64, I think we're good to go. ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:05:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271605.k3RG5dH7007520@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 12:05 EST ------- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:08:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] New: Review Request: php-pear-Log Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.4-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: The Log framework provides an abstracted logging system. It supports logging to console, file, syslog, SQL, Sqlite, mail, and mcal targets. It also provides a subject - observer mechanism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:11:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271611.k3RGBc80008879@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-04-27 12:11 EST ------- Hmmm Paul - do you want to take over packaging and I'll review? I'm only swamped with work, not seriously swamped :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:29:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271629.k3RGTSfl012814@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-27 12:29 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-1.2.5-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-1.2.5-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.5-2 - Changed ownership of device nodes to "root" in udev rules file. - Don't build sethdlc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:35:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189830] Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271635.k3RGZCh2014555@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-scrobber - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189830 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-27 12:34 EST ------- Thx for the review. Package has been updated to current 0.3.8 (upstream changed urls. gnarghl.) and build. closing as nextrelease. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:45:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271645.k3RGjSbm017325@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-27 12:45 EST ------- FYI, there's a new kmodtool (0.10.7) available in CVS, for example in lirc-kmod devel, which should make yum behave better with the resulting packages. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lirc-kmod/?root=extras By the way, the SRPM url in comment 27 has noe "-1.2.5" too many. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271653.k3RGrJ8S019104@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-27 12:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > > /usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos123.cc ../d_mos123.cc > > > > - The build system compiles against symlinks to the actual source files, > which > > seems to confuse rpmbuild when it creates the debuginfo package. You might > > > try using hardlinks instead of softlinks to work around this. > > > > I noticed this too, this also came up during a review by me of kismet which > generates the same warnings. We (I and the kismet packager) concider this an > rpmbuild bug and have bugzilla'd it, see: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189928 I agree that it's a bug in rpmbuild, but you still end up producing an almost uselss debuginfo package. I found a simple workaround. Add the following two lines to %prep to use hardlinks instead of softlinks: %{__sed} -i 's!ln -s!ln!g' src/Make1 %{__sed} -i 's!ln -s!ln!g' src/Make.aux > > QUESTIONS > > ========= > > * There seems to be two home pages for gnucap. The one listed in the > > spec file at www.gnu.org lists 0.31 as the most recent version. But > > a similarly looking page at http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gnucap > > shows 0.34. Why the two home pages? > > > > I noticed this too, it seems that gnucap @ gnu is dead, and that the geda > project has taken it over. In that case the URL tag should point to the Geda project page, since the gnu project page hasn't been updated since version 0.31, almost 4 years ago. Add a comment with a pointer to the gnu.org page if you feel it's necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:54:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271654.k3RGsAno019333@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-27 12:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #261) > Created an attachment (id=128285) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128285&action=view) [edit] > initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1-3 spec file > > (In reply to comment #250) > > 1. initng-ifiles %post doesent generate the required files... > > the generate script actually only does something if the -all switch is used. > > I really wonder why that was changed. Well, I'll add -all to it then... > for me -all creates some files but it does not even add gdm and some services that are started in sysvinit > > 3. and initng %post requires grubby to be installed. (post requires) > > Check again. Grubby is run from %triggerin -- mkinitrd now. > > > (In reply to comment #251) > > #250: 2. audit wasnt installed on my fc5 test system (fresh install with > > updates) i have to look into that. not an initng problem really unless maybe > of > > the runlevel gen... why did it add it when its not present. > > Hmmm... I thought audit was one of those fundamental things that was installed > on all recent fedora systems? > no audit is only for debugging. > > (In reply to comment #252) > > at some point of booting up initng output becomes russian for me. someone has > > > to figure out what script triggers that. (probably wrong encoding?) it > switches > > back at the end of the booting process. > > This one is really a pain in the ass. I tried hard to fix it a while back > (check #84 above) without any success. You could try running with "interactive" > on the grub prompt, I guess it would make it easier to determine where the > problem is. > > > (In reply to comment #259) > > This spec file fixes the x86_64 build issues and the rpath issues. > > Is this really a good idea? Hardcoding stuff in our spec file because they're > hardcoded upstreams? ok fixed it upstream (commit 3961) add -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:STRING=/%{_lib} to the cmake line in the spec file. other issue: the deps have a chicken egg problem : initng-ifiles requires initng-devel to build; initng-devel depends on initng; initng depends on initng-ifiles so I am forced to use --nodeps onm initng-devel does it really require initng? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189416] Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271654.k3RGsEm9019349@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189416 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-27 12:54 EST ------- Ignacio, has this been imported into FE CVS yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 16:58:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271658.k3RGwGh2020219@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-04-27 12:58 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline-0.4-6.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > spectool cannot fetch the upstream source; your Source: URL is wrong. Fixed, I think. I cannot reach dl.sourceforge.net at the present time. :-( > you perhaps include a quick description of a PAR2 file in %description? I modified it: "par2cmdline is a program for creating and using PAR2 files. PAR2 files are usually published in binary newsgroups, on Usenet. They apply the data-recovery capability concepts of RAID-like systems to the posting and recovery of multi-part archives. On Usenet, PAR2 files are posted together with multi-part archives. par2cmdline can detect and repair dammaged files using the corresponding PAR2 files." Perhaps somebody can help me to correct my english. I declare the hunt of frenchisms opened! ;) (I personnaly use it to repair files from binaries of Lost, season?2, which will not be on french TV until next year. But do not tell to anybody!) > Please use the recommended BuildRoot: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Done. > Please remove Distribution: SuSE 9.1. Sorry! Done. As you can see, I have adapted an existing (and trivial) spec file. > I'm not sure about your Obsoletes: and Provides:, but I'll assume you > have some previous package history that requires this. I'll ask the list > for a bit of guidance. I do not understand. parchive-1.1.4 exists in Fedora Extras?4. See ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/SRPMS/parchive-1.1-4.src.rpm par2cmdline provides the same functionalities as parchive, and has a symlink /usr/bin/par->par2. That's why I made this couple of Obsoletes:/Provides: Perhaps I am wrong. I must admit that I am not totally used with such a trick. > rpmlint complains: > You should remove the executable bits from these files in %build; Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:07:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271707.k3RH7guv022306@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2006-04-27 13:07 EST ------- Thank you for your careful review Jason and your thoughtful comments. I'm sorry I haven't responded sooner but I've got higher priority tasks than lurker packaging which have captured my attention. FYI, it was my plan to address the issue of a world writable database files by adding the owner and group to the configure script and passing it configure via %{mta_owner} and %{mta_group}. I do realized it is not strictly required to have this be available to configure because the RPM %files section can enforce the permissions but it is my belief that making this explicit is a win in terms of readability, upstream use, and those who may use configure outside the context of rpm. This is why these two variables appeared in the spec file, once configure could accept them they would be passed and set in the %files section. As for modern MTA configuration with respect to mail delivery I can attest as the previous maintainer for postfix, dovecot and mailman this is an area of endless user confusion :-( (Did you know postfix will deliver under the user id associated with the alias file the alias was found in?) Now throw into the mix per user procmail :-( It can be a mess and the source of lots of bug reports and list questions. I believe the best solution is to be absolutely explicit over the expected owner and group and thus will allevate 1 axis of confusion. As indicated above I will modify the spec file to make this absolutely explicit and locked down. With respect to requiring a C++ compiler, the code is C++ so that seemed necessary. It sounds like you may be more familar with this particular issue than I am so I will defer to you on this topic. You are correct, %{buildsubdir} is not guarenteed to exist, I'll fix that. I'm not sure I share your opinion that RPM_SOURCE_DIR should never be used. I appreciate that SOURCEn will always properly refer to it but I find use of SOURCEn to reduce readability and comprehenion of spec files. Whenever I encouter this use when reading a spec file I have to mentally expand the macro to understand what the spec file is doing, I find it much more comprensible if the operation is explicit. Hmm... I suppose the same argument could be used against %{httpdconffile} :-) At the time I packaged up lurker only the 1.3 version was available. Looks like the 2.0 release occurred shortly after I completed my work but before I got my review request in. I agree, 2.1 should be version in extras. I'll go back and do that, but it won't be immediate, I've got other tasks on my plate. I'm also going to have to figure out the differences between 1.3 and 2.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271709.k3RH9iJo022791@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-27 13:09 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-kmod-1.2.5-4.2.6.16_1.2157_FC6.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-kmod-1.2.5-4.2.6.16_1.2157_FC6.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.5-4 - Updated kmodtool to 0.10.7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:12:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271712.k3RHCXa5023559@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 13:12 EST ------- One last note, the debuginfo rpmlint warning can be fixed by replacing the symlink with a hardlink in %prep. I filed a bug against rpm about this, see bug 189928. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:14:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271714.k3RHErQS024293@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128286|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 13:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128312&action=view) improved specfile (In reply to comment #5) > I agree that it's a bug in rpmbuild, but you still end up producing an almost > useless debuginfo package. I found a simple workaround. Add the following two > lines to %prep to use hardlinks instead of softlinks: > > %{__sed} -i 's!ln -s!ln!g' src/Make1 > %{__sed} -i 's!ln -s!ln!g' src/Make.aux > Ok, I agree that this is a good workaround for now, added. > In that case the URL tag should point to the Geda project page, since the gnu > project page hasn't been updated since version 0.31, almost 4 years ago. My bad, I though the gnu page went all the way to 0.34 and the only thing the geda page had extra were the unstable snapshots, fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:15:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190108] New: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190108 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-XML-SAX-Expat.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-XML-SAX-Expat-0.37-1.src.rpm Description: This is an implementation of a SAX2 driver sitting on top of Expat (XML::Parser) which Ken MacLeod posted to perl-xml and which has been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:42:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189416] Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271742.k3RHgCng032482@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nose: A discovery-based unittest extension for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189416 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-27 13:41 EST ------- It has, I've just been swamped. Build on devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:51:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180102] Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271751.k3RHpNIT002515@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180102 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-27 13:51 EST ------- Built on FC4, FC5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:51:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180149] Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271751.k3RHpYXF002572@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180149 Bug 180149 depends on bug 180102, which changed state. Bug 180102 Summary: Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180102 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 17:51:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180149] Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271751.k3RHprhW002652@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180149 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 180149 depends on bug 180102, which changed state. Bug 180102 Summary: Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180102 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-27 13:51 EST ------- Built on FC5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:08:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271808.k3RI8bDe007305@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 14:08 EST ------- I'm slowly descending into the bsd-games source, some initial remarks: 1) in bsd-games-2.17-hackgid.patch (line 81) you've seem to have left in / added a debug printf. 2) in hack you allow the user to specify the save game location and then the savegame gets opened with full gamehack gid rights. This is a problem. Please modify hack so that the first thing it does in main is: gamehack_gid = getegid(); setgid(getgid()); Where gamehack_gid is a global available gid_t and then when it needs the extra rights it should do: setgid(gamehack_gid); // do stuff setgid(getgid()); 3) The same (2) probably also goes for the other games which don't permanently drop their setgid rights with setresgid. The spec looks good, but it will probably take me some time to properly review all the setresgid using games for any problems. In the mean time a new version addressing the above would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:09:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271809.k3RI9GDc007494@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174546 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-04-27 14:08 EST ------- re: comment #27: I am unsure what you mean by your comment. Please elaborate. re: comment #28: Changed all occurences of /svn to /srv in Trac on Fedora wiki: http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/wiki/TracOnFedoraCore page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:14:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190108] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271814.k3RIEZP9009400@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190108 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-27 14:14 EST ------- Is there an application that requires XML-SAX-Expat specifically, or is the intention to just ship a SAX2 implementation that is an improvement over the already shipped ones? I'm not really objecting, but there's XML-SAX-ExpatXS, which as far as I can know is more featureful, faster, and more actively maintained. http://rt.cpan.org/Dist/Display.html?Queue=XML-SAX-Expat http://rt.cpan.org/Dist/Display.html?Queue=XML-SAX-ExpatXS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:26:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271826.k3RIQCwT013238@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-27 14:26 EST ------- Looks much better now. All MUST items fixed. I'll trust you that that the package works since I'm not familiar enough with how to use it. Now I can start the long process of reviewing gcompris. :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:27:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271827.k3RIRuPO013866@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:31:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271831.k3RIVJmG015123@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-27 14:31 EST ------- http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/wings-0.98.32b-5.fc5.src.rpm I changed the documentation and summary a little and split off the -docs package. The README files are also removed and the SOURCE tags updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:46:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271846.k3RIkTA4020840@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat at redhat.com 2006-04-27 14:46 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/pnasrat/extras/python-ctypes-0.9.9.6-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/pnasrat/extras/python-ctypes.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 18:59:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189400] Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271859.k3RIx4VN025027@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: em8300(-kmod) - Hollywood+/DXR3 hardware MPEG decoder drivers and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189400 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-04-27 14:59 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/em8300-kmod-0.15.3-3.2.6.16_1.2096_FC5.src.rpm * Thu Apr 27 2006 Ville Skytt? - 0.15.3-3 - Provide "kernel-modules" instead of "kernel-module" to match yum's config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 19:37:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271937.k3RJbA0A002849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-27 15:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I added a BR: for texinfo and all is well. Ok. > rpmlint complains: > > W: gauche file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/gauche-refe.info-3.gz > > E: gauche-debuginfo non-readable > /usr/src/debug/Gauche-0.8.7/ext/sxml/sxml-sxpath.c 0600 > (and many similar lines) I created a patch for this. I will try to push this upstream. > The build process is creating these intermediate files: > > /tmp/Gauche-0.8.7> find . -name sxml-sxpath.c -ls > 197853 708 -rw------- 1 tibbs users 719935 Apr 26 22:39 > ./ext/sxml/sxml-sxpath.c Ok, I changed all *.c files to 0644 > E: gauche-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I am somewhat annoyed that rpmlint reports this as an error, not as a warning. Of course the include files should be in /usr/include/gauche/%{version} or something similar, however "gauche-config" reports the /usr/lib directory, and I don't think it is wise to make major restructuring. However, I will suggest this upstream. > W: gauche-devel doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/gauche-devel-0.8.7/template.DIST /bin/sh > This file should not be executable. Ok. Update at: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-0.8.7-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 19:39:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604271939.k3RJdH2t003660@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 15:39 EST ------- Okay, I've reviewed all the "sgid games"-games except for bsd-tetris which seems to be a special case. Remarks: 1) cfscores is sgid games, but canfield/cfscores/cfscores.c drops rights immediatly even before reading the scores file because of this and since this program only reads hence I believe the sgid bit is not needed. 2) Whats the use of having dm if we install the games directly instead of in a "hide" path and creating gamename symlinks to the game? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 20:00:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272000.k3RK0d3X008888@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 16:00 EST ------- I just also checked tetris, thats ok too. Mike could you, post a new version which takes my comments from comment 30 and comment 31 into account, then I can hopefully use that for a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 20:02:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272002.k3RK2Gdq009360@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 16:02 EST ------- Imported and build, Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 20:02:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272002.k3RK2RFL009475@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 Bug 189717 depends on bug 189699, which changed state. Bug 189699 Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 20:11:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272011.k3RKB94V011331@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-27 16:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > I just also checked tetris, thats ok too. > > Mike could you, post a new version which takes my comments from comment 30 and > comment 31 into account, then I can hopefully use that for a full review. I'm working on that now in between meetings. :) I'll have something by evening PDT. I think I'm going to drop dm altogether since it takes a significant amount of admin work to use, and I don't see too much benefit from using it. Besides, the links to dm will get replaced with the actual binaries once the package gets an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 20:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] New: Review Request: python-krbV Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 Summary: Review Request: python-krbV Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mikeb at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/python-krbV/python-krbV.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/python-krbV/python-krbV-1.0.12-2.src.rpm Description: python-krbV allows python programs to use Kerberos 5 authentication/security -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 20:37:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272037.k3RKbLf3017531@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-04-27 16:37 EST ------- %changelog * Thu Apr 27 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-6 - devel: Requires: pkgconfig Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-6.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272104.k3RL4Iwd023278@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 17:04 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/gtksourceview-sharp.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-6.src.rpm Quite a lot of fixes from the 0-4 release. I am still having the same x86_64 problems as before, but I have the i386 version running here and at work (work is x86_64) without a problem. This version has both boo and java support built in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:05:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272105.k3RL5XxA023562@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 17:05 EST ------- Oh poo! Just realised that boo and java support are for monodevelop and not gtksourceview-sharp. I bad ;-p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:06:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272106.k3RL6eD0023753@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-04-27 17:06 EST ------- The issue in Comment #1 is the result of the default configuration triggering a deprecated feature in dnsmasq. The solution the error message suggests (defining HAVE_ISC_READER) is a hack to re-enable that feature. The dnsmasq author asked me quite kindly to not enable the feature, as he'd rather not get any more users hooked on a feature which will be going away eventually. The workaround (which you should be doing anyway) is to set dhcp-range and dhcp-leasefile in the configuration file. I've released an update (2.30-3) which doesn't have the feature enabled, and also cleans up my slightly hacked patch situation. It should be pushed out to mirrors shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:07:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272107.k3RL7t02023951@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 17:07 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop-0.10-8.src.rpm Boo and java support are now built as part of the package. As before, the x86_64 version has problems due to packaging, but the i386 version works fine on both x86_64 and i386 without a hitch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:09:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187625] Review Request: ices IceS is a source client for a streaming server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272109.k3RL9U88024351@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ices IceS is a source client for a streaming server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187625 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2006-04-27 17:09 EST ------- So it turns out that someone had already submitted ices for review. Silly me for not noticing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:11:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272111.k3RLBCQ9024636@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 17:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta2.spec SRPM : http://www.smmp/salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta-2.0.1-2.src.rpm It can only be built without the %{?_smp_flags}. The package builds but breaks when installed and run. I have a feeling that is down to me rather than anything else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:13:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272113.k3RLDS9x025032@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 17:13 EST ------- Odd. This is building fine outside of mock. Could this be an selinux problem (ISTR seeing something similar with a C# package reported on the extras list)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 21:25:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] New: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-DBM-Deep/perl-DBM-Deep.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-DBM-Deep/perl-DBM-Deep-0.983-1.src.rpm Description: A unique flat-file database module, written in pure perl. True multi-level hash/array support (unlike MLDBM, which is faked), hybrid OO / tie() interface, cross-platform FTPable files, and quite fast. Can handle millions of keys and unlimited hash levels without significant slow-down. Written from the ground-up in pure perl -- this is NOT a wrapper around a C-based DBM. Out-of-the-box compatibility with Unix, Mac OS X and Windows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 22:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272210.k3RMAgkX006896@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-27 18:10 EST ------- I'm all for dropping dm, its a strange beast, especially since there is no similar functionality for any of the other games we package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 22:37:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] New: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rpm at timj.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/rapidsvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/rapidsvn-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: RapidSVN is a GUI front-end for the Subversion revision control system. It allows access to most of the features of Subversion through a user-friendly interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 22:37:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272237.k3RMbdKj013099@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-04-27 18:37 EST ------- Okay, I'm hoping this took care of the problem. Now please try: Spec URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-4.3.0.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 22:44:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272244.k3RMiRhX014787@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-04-27 18:44 EST ------- OK, I've looked into this. The /usr/share/clamav/clamd-wrapper script, provided by clamav-server, hardcodes "clamd.XXX" as the service name in several places. So either we stick with clamd.exim as the service name or have to file a bug with Enrico and get him to patch the main ClamAV package. I presume there was some reason why clamd.XXX was chosen. Also, this package should possibly be renamed clamav-server-exim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 27 23:42:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604272342.k3RNgkxW028458@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |andreas at bawue.net ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-27 19:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > One important thing is that this extension (as HTML, Net_SMTP, Net_Socket and XML_Parser) was included until php-5.0.4 in FC4. So it's needed for backward compatibility of Fedora Core >= 5. Are you certain about this? The php Package in core does include the mail() function, but AFAIK it never included pear-mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 00:31:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280031.k3S0Vtq0006810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 20:31 EST ------- Thanks for fixing things up. I'll just respond point by point: The source URL is good; Sourceforge often fails to respond for me, but things usually start to work if you try long enough. Let me try to fix up the %description a bit, using what's in the README: ---- par2cmdline is a program for creating and using PAR2 files to detect damage in data files and repair them if necessary. PAR2 files are usually published in binary newsgroups on Usenet; they apply the data-recovery capability concepts of RAID-like systems to the posting and recovery of multi-part archives. ---- BuildRoot: is now good. Distribution: SuSE 9.1 is gone. The problem with Obsoletes: is that you's behavior can be counter-intuitive, but what you have here is fine. rpmlint is now silent. The only remaining issue is that I didn't notice the test suite upstream (which was dumb of me since it's pretty obvious). Can you add this after %clean: %check make check-TESTS to run the test suite? I checked that it passes on i386 and x86_64. APPROVED. Just add the %check bit when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 00:47:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280047.k3S0l3Mw010971@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 00:50:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] New: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/hevea/hevea.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/hevea/hevea-1.08-2.src.rpm Description: HEVEA is a quite complete and fast LATEX to HTML translator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 00:52:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280052.k3S0qrBA012109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-27 20:52 EST ------- The rpmlint message about there not being any executables in /usr/lib should be ignorable, as no .so files are packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 01:55:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280155.k3S1tgFE025681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 21:55 EST ------- Oops, it seems I took this package by mistake, but I'll go ahead and do a review. Right off, there's a build failure on x86_64: checking for Subversion headers... found checking for Subversion libraries... not found configure: error: Subversion libraries are required. Try --with-svn-lib. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54929 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54929 (%build) Error building package from rapidsvn-0.9.1-1.src.rpm, See build log ending However, the build succeeds on i386. My assumption is that it isn't checking /usr/lib64 for the subversion libraries. You can probably pass --with-svn-lib="/usr/lib /usr/lib64" to build everywhere. Issues: You include the COPYING file, but it contains only the string "Fill me in with licensing information". The actual license is more complex than just GPL, it seems. LICENSE.txt contains all of the details, so it should probably be packaged. I think "GPL and LGPL" would be a more appropriate license tag. Is autoconf really required? I didn't see it being called in the build log, and removing it doesn't seem to hurt anything. rpmlint complains: E: rapidsvn library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libsvncpp.so.0.0.0 E: rapidsvn library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libsvncpp.so.0.0.0 You need to call ldconfig in %post and %postun: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets (the "Shared Libraries" section). W: rapidsvn devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsvncpp.so The guidelines indicate that if you have a versioned .so, the unversioned one must go in a -devel package. It seems there's a bunch of headers included in /usr/include; those should probably go in a -devel package as well. (Well, they're .hpp files, which I haven't seen before, but they look like C++ class definitions.) There does seem to be some kind of test suite (in src/tests/svncpp), but I'm not sure how you would go about calling it. This isn't a blocker, but you might want to take a look. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X license field matches the actual license. X license is open source-compatible and included upstream but is not included in the package. * source files match upstream: ba03034db35912c7b51b146cc7e6090e rapidsvn-0.9.1.tar.gz ba03034db35912c7b51b146cc7e6090e rapidsvn-0.9.1.tar.gz-srpm ? BuildRequires are proper (not sure about autoconf) X package fails to build in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent. O final provides and requires are sane. X shared libraries are present; ldconfig should be called but isn't. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check not present; there seems to be an upstream test suite, but it's not immediately obvious how it would be called. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. X headers present in main package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * a GUI app; desktop file properly installed with desktop-file-install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 02:12:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280212.k3S2Cd3V029736@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 22:12 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 09ddd163183e983bf1085688d0b25b75 DBM-Deep-0.983.tar.gz 09ddd163183e983bf1085688d0b25b75 DBM-Deep-0.983.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386) * rpmlint is silent. O final provides and requires are sane. (DBM::Deep::_::Root is a bit weird, but that's really what the package is called.) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=28, Tests=371, 15 wallclock secs (12.99 cusr + 1.02 csys = 14.01 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 02:15:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280215.k3S2FHhu030504@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 02:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280241.k3S2fKlp005643@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-27 22:41 EST ------- Thx for the review, package has been built, closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 03:34:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280334.k3S3YgpM019985@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174546 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2006-04-27 23:34 EST ------- Well, the wiki may be the place to make this change, but its example currently has: sudo trac-admin /srv/trac/foobar initenv This will fail unless /srv/trac already exists, so it could be included in the rpm. Alternatively the wiki could be updated to do just sudo trac-admin /srv/trac initenv though first-time users might be confused that they are creating a trac environment actually named "trac". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 05:29:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280529.k3S5TYJk010551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 01:29 EST ------- Something seems to have busted; now I can't build any of the packages you've submitted on the development branch. Things start to go off here: os_dep.c:20:30: error: linux/version.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/asm/signal.h:5, from os_dep.c:27: /usr/include/asm-x86_64/signal.h:6:27: error: linux/linkage.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/signal.h:7, from /usr/include/asm/signal.h:5, from os_dep.c:27: /usr/include/linux/time.h:9: error: redefinition of 'struct timespec' /usr/include/linux/time.h:15: error: redefinition of 'struct timeval' /usr/include/linux/time.h:42: error: redefinition of 'struct itimerspec' In file included from /usr/include/asm/signal.h:5, from os_dep.c:27: /usr/include/asm-x86_64/signal.h:15: error: conflicting types for 'sigset_t' /usr/include/signal.h:50: error: previous declaration of 'sigset_t' was here In file included from /usr/include/asm/signal.h:5, from os_dep.c:27: /usr/include/asm-x86_64/signal.h:102: error: redefinition of 'struct sigaction' /usr/include/asm-x86_64/signal.h:103: error: expected ':', ',', ';', '}' or '__attribute__' before '.' token /usr/include/asm-x86_64/signal.h:113: error: redefinition of 'struct sigaltstack' I'll attach a build log, but fortunately things still build on the FC5 release branch, and that's all that's required, so I'll proceed with the review on that basis. I think something must have busted since I last pulled from rawhide a couple of days ago. The first file it can't find, /usr/include/linux/version.h, is in FC5 part of glibc-kernheaders but it's not there in current rawhide. Issues: You should package the COPYING file as %doc. I'm inclined to ignore the remaining rpmlint complaint. In reality fixing gauche-config should be a simple matter of patching src/genconfig.in, but I have no way of knowing what that might break. And anyway, compilers tend to be something of a special case (c.f. gcc). There's a test suite that you don't call; I added %check cd src; LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} make test and it runs and, most importantly, passes. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. X license is open source-compatible and is included upstream but is not included in the package. * source files match upstream: 5c7cb6eba7455c9877aec884b0088a25 Gauche-0.8.7.tgz 5c7cb6eba7455c9877aec884b0088a25 Gauche-0.8.7.tgz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (fc5, i386 and x86_64). O rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called as necessary. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. X %check is not present, but upstream includes one that can easily be run. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers present and in a -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 05:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280533.k3S5XfGr011735@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 01:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128340) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128340&action=view) Logg for failing build in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 05:47:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280547.k3S5l83H014915@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 01:46 EST ------- Everything looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 05:57:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280557.k3S5vdHG017135@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-28 01:57 EST ------- I've addressed the issues from comment 30 and comment 31. The hack gid patch has a lot of changes to limit the setgid portions of code. Fortunately, phantasia was easier to deal with, and sail was already done upstream. dm has also been dropped. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games-2.17-7.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 06:45:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280645.k3S6jPZw027668@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-04-28 02:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Odd. This is building fine outside of mock. Could this be an selinux problem > (ISTR seeing something similar with a C# package reported on the extras list)? This looks to me more like a missing buildreq than an SELinux issue. Are the missing files generated by some tool that needs to be buildreq-ed? I think it would be a very good idea for you to try out a local mock setup as it's *great* for finding things like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 06:59:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280659.k3S6x4Z1030381@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-28 02:59 EST ------- Not sure. When I look at the built RPM everything is there. I'll give mock a shot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 08:11:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280811.k3S8BaoF019785@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-28 04:11 EST ------- Yes, i'm quite sure. # rpm -qlp php-5.0.4-10.5.src.rpm | grep gz$ DB-1.7.6.tgz HTTP-1.3.5.tgz Mail-1.1.4.tgz Net_SMTP-1.2.6.tgz Net_Socket-1.0.6.tgz XML_Parser-1.2.6.tgz XML_RPC-1.4.0.tgz php-5.0.4.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 08:19:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280819.k3S8JEdL022100@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-28 04:18 EST ------- Are you in need of a sponsor? I don't see the e-mail that opened this bug in the owners.list file. If you are in need of a sponsor, you should add bug #177841 the the Bug 183439 blocks field -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 08:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280834.k3S8YQ6b026453@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-28 04:34 EST ------- Looking good, almost there! MUST: ----- * rpmlint output is: E: bsd-games configure-without-libdir-spec E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/robots_roll E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/canfield 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/characs gamephant E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/phantasia/characs E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/snake 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia gamephant E: bsd-games non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/phantasia 0775 E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /usr/bin/phantasia gamephant E: bsd-games setgid-binary /usr/bin/phantasia gamephant 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/phantasia 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/robots 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/hack gamehack E: bsd-games non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/hack 0775 E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/motd gamephant E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/phantasia/motd E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/atc 02755 E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/cfscores E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/atc_score E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/hack/record gamehack E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/hack/record E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/battlestar 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/saillog gamesail E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/saillog E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/tetris-bsd 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /usr/bin/sail gamesail E: bsd-games setgid-binary /usr/bin/sail gamesail 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sail 02755 E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/tetris-bsd.scores E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/monsters gamephant E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/cribbage 02755 E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/criblog E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/scoreboard gamephant E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/phantasia/scoreboard E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/mess gamephant E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/phantasia/mess E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/hack/perm gamehack E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/hack/perm E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/sail gamesail E: bsd-games non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/sail 0775 E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/battlestar.log E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/void gamephant E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/phantasia/void E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/snakerawscores E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/lastdead gamephant E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/phantasia/lastdead E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /var/games/phantasia/gold gamephant E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/phantasia/gold E: bsd-games zero-length /var/games/snake.log E: bsd-games non-standard-gid /usr/bin/hack gamehack E: bsd-games setgid-binary /usr/bin/hack gamehack 02755 E: bsd-games non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/hack 02755 These are all not a problem, see discussion above. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok (see below) * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns all dirs it installs, with one exception see below. * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST Fix: --------- * Add missing "Requires(Pre): /usr/sbin/groupadd" * Package must own /usr/share/bsd-games Should Fix: ----------- * "# It looks like textutils became coreutils at some point. I'm not sure # what is needed from it, so I'm commenting it out until I can find out. #Requires: textutils" * Maybe use "BSD" as license, as all games eem to be under one or the other variant of the BSD license? * Shouldn't the highscore files be marked %config(noreplace) ? * Suspicious compiler warnings: "canfield/cfscores/cfscores.c:130: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false" "hunt/hunt/playit.c:117: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type" "hunt/hunt/playit.c:652: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type "phantasia/setup.c:71: warning: 'path' may be used uninitialized in this function" " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 08:36:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280836.k3S8aULC027200@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 08:40:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] New: Review Request: php-mail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 Summary: Review Request: php-mail Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP-1.4.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: The HTTP class is a class with static methods for doing miscellaneous HTTP related stuff like date formatting, language negotiation or HTTP redirection. Also see Bug #190066 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 08:41:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280841.k3S8f8Tr028810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-mail |Review Request: php-pear- | |HTTP OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 08:47:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280847.k3S8lQiQ031004@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 09:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280907.k3S97luC004258@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-04-28 05:07 EST ------- ( Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/par2cmdline-0.4-7.src.rpm ) Thank you Jason for your review! I am waiting now for my account creation approval. (...) Having read the guide again, it appears to me that I forgot one step: the sponsoring! :-( This my first review request for Fedora Extras, and I should have been reviewed by a sponsor! Jason, you did a good job with this review, however. I have added FE-NEEDSPONSOR to blockers. I hope this will unblock the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 09:24:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280924.k3S9O4Mx009038@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-28 05:24 EST ------- Some comments: * %post -p /usr/bin/texhash will automatically add Requires(post) /usr/bin/texhash So I think the explicit dependency on tetex-fonts is not really right as it may change in the future. * A dependence on kpsewhich should be there, however, in my opinion: BuildRequires: /usr/bin/kpsewhich * In my opinion the following should be used to detect %_texmf, since in configure kpsewhich is also used (even though a bit differently but I believe the result is the same) %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")} * the tetex package is picked up by tetex-latex, so I think that the dependencies on tetex should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 09:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604280952.k3S9qLBN016341@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-28 05:52 EST ------- kpsewhich is provided by tetex-fonts. It would need to be there if explicit tetex-fonts dependency is removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 10:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281001.k3SA1Z0v018700@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From david at readingroom.com 2006-04-28 06:01 EST ------- I'd like to see this in extras too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 10:18:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281018.k3SAIs5w022596@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-28 06:18 EST ------- Yes, that's what I said above. I think BuildRequires: /usr/bin/kpsewhich is better than BuildRequires: tetex-fonts Not a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 10:28:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281028.k3SASvOB024998@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-28 06:28 EST ------- NOT a formal review. Just some notes The stuff it puts in /usr/lib might be better to put in /usr/share since it looks to be arch independent. maybe in /usr/share/hevea -=- It probably should require tetex-latex since it puts files in texmf/tex/latex/ LATEXLIBDIR=%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/hevea should be done differently. define a macro as follows: %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")} Then use LATEXLIBDIR=%{_texmf}/tex/latex/hevea That allows people using a custom texmf to rebuild the src.rpm defining where the texmf is that they want it to use. -=- I'm willing to review formally next week if someone else does not decide to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 10:46:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281046.k3SAkwX1030362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2006-04-28 06:46 EST ------- I'm currently investigating some problems in the code, when that is done I will post a new version of the srpm. Expect this for next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 11:16:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281116.k3SBGwaM004644@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|andreas at bawue.net |gauret at free.fr CC| |andreas at bawue.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-04-28 07:16 EST ------- Needs work: * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) * The package cannot be noarch since it installs files to %{_libdir} (which is /usr/lib64 on x86_64) * Build section is useless, you can safely remove it * The test dir for PEAR packages is called "test", not "tests" (in /usr/share/pear/) * Build failed in mock with this message: install ok: channel://pear.php.net/Mail-1.1.10 PHP Fatal error: Call to a member function setConfig() on a non-object in /usr/share/pear/PEAR/Command/Install.php on line 546 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10675 (%install) I propose to install the files without the pear tool, by just copying them. It should make it much easier to debug. Incoming patch... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 11:18:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281118.k3SBIeRj005072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-04-28 07:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128357) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128357&action=view) New install system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 11:33:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281133.k3SBXPru008347@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-28 07:33 EST ------- New spec&srpm at http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/hevea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 12:18:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281218.k3SCI7KG018697@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-28 08:18 EST ------- I should have mentioned this - but you also need to BuildRequires /usr/bin/kpsewhich to use the _texmf macro - or else mock will fail. Also - since the package installs a file into the texmf tree, you should have %post texhash >/dev/null 2>&1 || : %postun texhash >/dev/null 2>&1 || : so that ls-R database gets updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 12:57:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281257.k3SCvAVW028075@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From Didier.Moens at dmbr.UGent.be 2006-04-28 08:56 EST ------- SRPM upgraded to upstream 2.3.3 ; fixed spec-file in accordance with comment #1. http://www.dmbr.ugent.be/~didier/sec/sec-2.3.3-1.src.rpm http://www.dmbr.ugent.be/~didier/sec/sec.spec TIA for reviewing ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 13:35:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187799] Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281335.k3SDZeSj005776@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cairo - Perl interface to the cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187799 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-28 09:35 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. Now I have to update perl-Gtk2 (FC-5 and devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 14:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281403.k3SE39Wg013507@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From wk at ire.pw.edu.pl 2006-04-28 10:03 EST ------- Adding "-lgl " to GDGEDA_LIBS makes libgeda to require libgd.so.2. Now I am going to try a complete build without libgdgeda. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 14:21:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281421.k3SELXQC018359@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-28 10:21 EST ------- Note: This is not a formal review. 1. Package doesn't build in Mock. Looks like your missing some BuildRequires. For information on Mock, refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks. 2. Duplicate BuildRequires: automake (by php-devel), php (by php-devel), autoconf (by php-devel), libtool & gcc-c++ (provided in base install in Mock) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 14:26:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281426.k3SEQoB5019708@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-28 10:26 EST ------- Cool, keep up the good work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 14:31:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281431.k3SEVXvH021017@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-04-28 10:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Ping? I think, this PR has been lingering around long enough and should be closed to give others who might be more interested into this package that the OP an opportunity to take over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 14:41:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190175] New: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190175 Summary: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/p0rn-comfort/p0rn-comfort.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/p0rn-comfort/p0rn-comfort-0.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: p0rn-comfort consists of several support programs for browsing image-gallery sites. It includes a proxy which enables blacklisting of thumbnail sites on-the-fly. It also supports queueing of entire pages for download and fetching them at a later time. Queuing can either be done manually (directly from your browser) or by an automated download script which can also follow links between different galleries. This tool is quite useful as well for browsing non-pr0n galleries such as deviantart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 15:15:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281515.k3SFFrbH032198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-28 11:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > MUST Fix: > --------- > * Add missing "Requires(Pre): /usr/sbin/groupadd" Added. > * Package must own /usr/share/bsd-games Good catch. It's owned now. > Should Fix: > ----------- > * "# It looks like textutils became coreutils at some point. I'm not sure > # what is needed from it, so I'm commenting it out until I can find out. > #Requires: textutils" I never did figure out what needs it. I didn't notice any obvious exec() or system() calls to external applications. > * Maybe use "BSD" as license, as all games eem to be under one or the other > variant of the BSD license? I won't object to that. I used Distributable as that's what RH7 used for the license before it was dropped. > * Shouldn't the highscore files be marked %config(noreplace) ? I say no. If the high score file formats changes at any time then we want to make sure that the old ones get removed. We could mark them as %config only, but that seems pointless because the only reason to preserve the old scoreboard files is if a migration tool is also provided to move it to the new format, and I don't see that happening for any of these games. > * Suspicious compiler warnings: > "canfield/cfscores/cfscores.c:130: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < > 0 is always false" > "hunt/hunt/playit.c:117: warning: comparison is always true due to limited > range of data type" > "hunt/hunt/playit.c:652: warning: comparison is always true due to limited > range of data type These are part of some paranoid error checking. All are harmless. > "phantasia/setup.c:71: warning: 'path' may be used uninitialized in this function" This is a bogus warning. Besides, this file is only used during the %build phase to create the initial shared game files, not as part of any shipped executable. New package with MUSTFIX fixes: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games-2.17-8.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bsd-games.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 16:48:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281648.k3SGmBkE022857@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 shahms at shahms.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 16:50:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] New: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4-4.0-0.5.beta1.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.0-0.5.beta1.src.rpm Description: These are Python bindings for Qt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 16:52:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281652.k3SGqs9u023888@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-04-28 12:52 EST ------- For devel/fc6 branch only, since it requires sip >= 4.4.2 Also requires qt4 (see bug #188180) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 16:53:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281653.k3SGr6ud023948@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190189 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 17:08:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190086] Review Request: rman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281708.k3SH8o43027081@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190086 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 17:25:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190086] Review Request: rman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281725.k3SHPO98030870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190086 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 13:25 EST ------- Everything looks good. Issues: Your Source URL points to a specific sourceforge mirror. Admittedly I was amazed that I was able to get the file on the first try, but I wonder if it's a good ide to do that. Is there any specific reason you chose to use that mirror? You don't package the stuff in contrib. If you wanted to, you'd need to delete or chmod 644 sco-wrapper.sh and then fix up end-of-line encodings and the perl shebang lines. You should ping upstream to include the text of their license. None of these are blockers. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 6d1d67641c6d042595a96a62340d3cc6 rman-3.2.tar.gz 6d1d67641c6d042595a96a62340d3cc6 rman-3.2.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns no non-%doc directories. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check present, no test suite upstream. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 17:28:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281728.k3SHS4bY031593@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 13:27 EST ------- It seems a new version came out today (0.99_01). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 17:39:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281739.k3SHdVA3002430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-28 13:39 EST ------- FWIW, I discovered that the change from setregid() to setresgid() is superfluous because it turns out, on linux at least, that setregid() will also change the saved gid if the new real gid is not -1, or if the new egid != the old egid. However, the setresgid patch should remain because it adds error checking to the setresgid() call and aborts if the privileges could not be dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 17:45:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281745.k3SHjPja003962@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-28 13:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > It seems a new version came out today (0.99_01). This is a development release (note the underscore). It should *never* be used as a stable release. /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 17:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281752.k3SHqEwM005432@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 13:51 EST ------- I've not seen the underscore convention before, but I do see the bug "***DEVELOPER RELEASE***" at CPAN. The daily updated packages messages sent to comp.lang.perl.announce unfortunately don't indicate development releases (unless you're expected to intuit such from the underscore in the version, I guess). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 18:02:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190135] Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281802.k3SI2IEF008336@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBM-Deep - A pure perl multi-level hash/array DBM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190135 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-28 14:02 EST ------- This a CPAN convention: a package is considered 'unstable' or 'development' if there is an underscore in the version number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 18:20:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190086] Review Request: rman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281820.k3SIK7ww013144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190086 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-28 14:19 EST ------- Thanks - I had intended to package contrib and neglected to :-/ It is packaged now (with %doc) - with correct line breaks and correct /usr/bin/perl for the contrib perl scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 18:58:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281858.k3SIwnrL025495@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 14:58 EST ------- The build failure seems to be fixed with last night's glibc-kernheaders package update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 19:46:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180300] Review Request: ccrtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604281946.k3SJk6VV007027@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccrtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180300 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 20:09:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180300] Review Request: ccrtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282009.k3SK98ja012393@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccrtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180300 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 16:08 EST ------- Issues: src/ccrtp/rtp.h is executable in the source tarball. It gets stuck in the debuginfo package, which causes rpmlint to complain: E: ccrtp-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ccrtp-1.3.7/src/ccrtp/rtp.h I suggest just doing chmod 644 src/ccrtp/rtp.h in %prep. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and is included in the package as %doc. * source files match upstream: 6621be1852bd90c3dbbafa895618d8f0 ccrtp-1.3.7.tar.gz 6621be1852bd90c3dbbafa895618d8f0 ccrtp-1.3.7.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint complains (see above) * final provides and requires are sane. * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is invoked as necessary. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directoryies it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X rtp.h has inappropriate permissions. * %clean is present. O %check not present; no test suite upstream. * code, not content. O documentation is large, but is all development-related and in the -devel subpackage. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in -devel subpackage. * pkgconfig files are in -devel. * unversioned libraries are in the -devel subpackage. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. With just one minor issue, I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 20:37:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] New: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPM URL: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: GQ is a graphical browser for LDAP directories and schemas. Using GQ, an administrator can search through a directory and modify objects stored in that directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 21:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282118.k3SLI9mo028389@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-28 17:18 EST ------- Thank for your comment. Here is the new spec. http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-zip.spec http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-zip-1.3.1-2.fc5.src.rpm 1/ upgrade to new version 2/ BuildRoot and Requires corrected 3/ Build with mock succed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 21:38:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282138.k3SLcHuW000842@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-28 17:38 EST ------- I added the %check and the COPYING file: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-0.8.7-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 21:50:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282150.k3SLo8Tm004297@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-28 17:49 EST ------- I'm quite confused by the %{_libdir} problem because I follow Joe Orton & Tim Jackson work on Bug #176733 (for php-pear-DB). For the install problem, i only have to substitue the --packagingroot option (which work with pear >= 1.4.8) by -R (for pear = 1.4.6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 21:50:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282150.k3SLoP6m004472@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 17:50 EST ------- Looks great and builds fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 21:53:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180300] Review Request: ccrtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282153.k3SLrwcn005574@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccrtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180300 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-28 17:53 EST ------- thx for the review, importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:16:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282216.k3SMGY3H010366@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 18:16 EST ------- A few odd things: The specfile you link immediately above isn't the one that's in the srpm. The specfile should be named according to the base RPM: anjuta.spec. Either that or the package name should be changed to anjuta2. I notice Anjuta is already in Extras (and you maintain it). Is it your intention to just upgrade the existing version or did you want this package to coexist? If the former, you technically don't need to go through a review, although you probably just want to push the new version for FC6 and leave the old ones alone. I tried to do a build but it fails: Cannot find build req gnome-build-devel. Exiting. I can't seem to find this anywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:27:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282227.k3SMRXdi012373@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-04-28 18:27 EST ------- > I'm quite confused by the %{_libdir} problem because I follow Joe Orton & Tim > Jackson work on Bug #176733 (for php-pear-DB). Well, %_libdir is different on AMD64 and on x86 & PPC. If you build your package as noarch, only one package will be build for all archs. Say the package was built on an AMD64 host: il will install the xml file in /usr/lib64/php/pear. If this package is installed on an x86 machine, the lib64 path will not be searched and the file will not be found. > For the install problem, i only have to substitue the --packagingroot option > (which work with pear >= 1.4.8) by -R (for pear = 1.4.6) Do as you want, you'll be maintaining it in the end. But just copying the files looked like the KISS way to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:33:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282233.k3SMXXKA013731@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-28 18:33 EST ------- * There are other requirements listed here http://hevea.inria.fr/doc/manual038.html#requirements After reading imagen, I propose Requires: netpbm-progs ghostscript tetex-dvips * You need the texhash run, which could be run using %post -p /usr/bin/texhash %postun -p /usr/bin/texhash Or as said in comment #4 * I don't think Group: Development/Languages is appropriate. I believe Group: Applications/Publishing is better. * one %{_datadir}/texmf/ is still there, to be replaced by %{_texmf} * Not a blocker but I think it would be nice to have the documentation http://hevea.inria.fr/distri/hevea-1.08-manual.tar.gz included (maybe in a -doc subpackage if you prefer). * Also not a blocker but a personal preference, I like to have trailing / in %files for directories, such that it is visible that these are directories. In that case this leads to: %{_datadir}/hevea/ %{_texmf}/tex/latex/hevea/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:47:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190231] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190231 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-Address.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-Address-1.80-1.src.rpm Description: This class implements a complete RFC 2822 parser that locates email addresses in strings and returns a list of "Email::Address" objects found. Alternatley you may construct objects manually. The goal of this software is to be correct, and very very fast. Note: Will be required by http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Recorder/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:49:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190232] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190232 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-Simple-1.92-1.src.rpm Description: "Email::Simple" is the first deliverable of the "Perl Email Project", a reaction against the complexity and increasing bugginess of the "Mail::*" modules. In contrast, "Email::*" modules are meant to be simple to use and to maintain, pared to the bone, fast, minimal in their external dependencies, and correct. Note: Will be required by http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Recorder/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:50:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282250.k3SMoJPv017274@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-28 18:50 EST ------- > * Not a blocker but I think it would be nice to have the documentation > http://hevea.inria.fr/distri/hevea-1.08-manual.tar.gz > included (maybe in a -doc subpackage if you prefer). After reading the licence of the doc it doesn't seems so clear. This licence doesn't seem to allow modification of the documentation, so it is not free documentation. It is not very clear in the fedora extras wiki. Documentation could be considered as non-executable content, but to be acceptable "The files must be necessary for the functionality of open source code being included in Fedora.", it is not very clear for documentation. In my opinion it goes against fedora extras goal, but if you really want to include documentation, I believe the best would be to ask on fedora list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:51:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190233] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190233 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MessageID.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MessageID-1.31-1.src.rpm Description: Message-ids are optional, but highly recommended, headers that identify a message uniquely. This software generates a unique message-id. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190233] Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282253.k3SMr5ek017870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190233 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190231 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 22:53:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190231] Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282253.k3SMrGGj017905@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190231 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190233 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 23:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190236] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType - Parse a MIME Content-Type Header Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190236 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType - Parse a MIME Content-Type Header Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-ContentType.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-ContentType-1.01-1.src.rpm Description: This module is responsible for parsing email content type headers according to section 5.1 of RFC 2045. It returns a hash as above, with entries for the discrete type, the composite type, and a hash of attributes. Note: another HTTP::Recorder requirement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 23:17:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190237] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190237 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings-1.3-1.src.rpm Description: This module simply wraps "MIME::Base64" and "MIME::QuotedPrint" so that you can throw the contents of a "Content-Transfer-Encoding" header at some text and have the right thing happen. Note: another HTTP::Recorder requirement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 28 23:57:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190231] Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604282357.k3SNvmqN029399@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190231 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 00:17:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190231] Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290017.k3T0Hw2K032485@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190231 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 20:17 EST ------- Not much to say... * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: b57726d9915a502bc6b52966217a453e Email-Address-1.80.tar.gz b57726d9915a502bc6b52966217a453e Email-Address-1.80.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=873, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.16 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 00:22:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190232] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290022.k3T0MEvl000675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190232 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 00:31:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190232] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290031.k3T0V139002167@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190232 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 20:30 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently, and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: e0ac39068afca5fa62f633a31a98f813 Email-Simple-1.92.tar.gz e0ac39068afca5fa62f633a31a98f813 Email-Simple-1.92.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=37, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.14 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 00:42:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190233] Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290042.k3T0gCpl004835@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190233 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 00:56:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190233] Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290056.k3T0ugRZ007062@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190233 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 20:56 EST ------- I added perl-Email-Address to a local repo to build this. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 578b8edbc259566ab61466e780481129 Email-MessageID-1.31.tar.gz 578b8edbc259566ab61466e780481129 Email-MessageID-1.31.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development + dependencies, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2009, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.21 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.24 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 02:07:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290207.k3T27eQi019738@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-28 22:07 EST ------- rpmlint: W: sec log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/sec.log W: sec dangerous-command-in-%post rpm W: sec dangerous-command-in-%preun rpm W: sec dangerous-command-in-%postun rpm E: sec no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/sec W: sec incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sec $prog The blocker here is the chkconfig line, you should change to something like "chkconfig: - 26 74" so it by default doesn't start in any runlevel. Missing dependancy on service for %postun (package initscripts) Missing dependancy on service for %preun (package initscripts) Missing dependancy on chkconfig for %post (package chkconfig) Missing dependancy on chkconfig for %preun (package chkconfig) You'll need to Require, say, /sin/service and /sbin/chkconfig Source0 doesn't download automatically, http://download.sourceforge.net/simple-evcorr/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 02:45:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290245.k3T2jUqh029030@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 22:45 EST ------- Well, heck, I worked up this review and then I noticed the NEEDSPONSOR blocker. But I looked through owners.list and I see that rpm at timj.co.uk already owns three packages, so perhaps that tag is out of date. I'll go ahead and include the review and just leave this as FE-NEW until things are cleared up. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: d7aeb59fa81cbe74c485c33873ea1c65 extract_forwarded-2.0.2.tar.gz d7aeb59fa81cbe74c485c33873ea1c65 extract_forwarded-2.0.2.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present, but they're not in the default locations so there's no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * creates no directories. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; no upstream test suite. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, assuming the NEEDSPONSOR blocker is incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 03:02:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190236] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType - Parse a MIME Content-Type Header In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290302.k3T32WtU000410@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType - Parse a MIME Content-Type Header https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190236 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 23:02 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and conforms to the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 1aa682d2841f5d568416772bbaede1c9 Email-MIME-ContentType-1.01.tar.gz 1aa682d2841f5d568416772bbaede1c9 Email-MIME-ContentType-1.01.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=6, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 03:09:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190237] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290309.k3T39Bkh002029@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190237 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 23:08 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: adb933af2ff9c3cc8e158bbdcf3d19e5 Email-MIME-Encodings-1.3.tar.gz adb933af2ff9c3cc8e158bbdcf3d19e5 Email-MIME-Encodings-1.3.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: 1..12 ok 1 - use Email::MIME::Encodings; ok 2 - enc binary ok 3 - dec binary ok 4 - enc 7bit ok 5 - dec 7bit ok 6 - enc 8bit ok 7 - dec 8bit ok 8 - enc qp ok 9 - dec qp ok 10 - enc 64 ok 11 - dec 64 ok 12 - Error handling + exit 0 * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 04:26:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188496] Review Request: PyQt-qscintilla In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290426.k3T4QiHR017930@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt-qscintilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188496 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 00:26 EST ------- Just took a quick look but I can't fetch the upstream source. It looks like they don't distribute 3.15 any longer. Now, if I understand things, this is just building some extra files that aren't included in the Core PyQt package. (They couldn't be; qscintilla is in Extras.) So the version of PyQt used here has to be exactly the same as the version that Core used for their packages. If so then we'll have to make an exception for the need for upstream sources. Just for grins I tried to build in rawhide; the build fails in configure.py. It builds fine on FC5 x86_64 (in mock). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 04:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] New: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-bridge.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-bridge-0.1.6-15.src.rpm Description: SCIM Bridge is an alternative Gtk Input Method module for SCIM implemented in C (ie it does not depend on libscim and libstdc++) to avoid libstdc++ symbol ABI conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 04:55:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290455.k3T4tcw9023209@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |167798 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 06:03:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290603.k3T63w5a001476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-29 02:03 EST ------- x86_64 bug is fixed for upstream initng-ifiles too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 07:26:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290726.k3T7QuZS016817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-29 03:26 EST ------- Builds fine on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 07:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] New: Review Request: PyX Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 Summary: Review Request: PyX Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mpeters at mac.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mpeters.us/PyX/PyX.spec SRPM URL: http://mpeters.us/PyX/PyX-0.8.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: PyX is a Python package for the creation of PostScript and PDF files. It combines an abstraction of the PostScript drawing model with a TeX/LaTeX interface. Complex tasks like 2d and 3d plots in publication-ready quality are built out of these primitives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 07:52:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290752.k3T7qwjn024379@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: PyX |Review Request: PyX - Python | |graphics package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 08:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290803.k3T839ci026737@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-04-29 04:02 EST ------- Whats the point of macros such as %{__rm} and %{__make}? I've seen them in some packages and have never quite understood why they exist. Fedora wiki doesn't say anything about them that I've seen. (And the spec template doesn't use them...) My personal preference is to avoid macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 08:27:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290827.k3T8RQqw032284@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-29 04:27 EST ------- Known bug (blocker) - installing in a buildroot results in broken pyx/siteconfig.py and pyx/siteconfig.pyc (includes the buildroot) I'll see if I can fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 08:35:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290835.k3T8ZO46001665@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-29 04:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #36) > > > MUST Fix: > > --------- > > * Package must own /usr/share/bsd-games > > Good catch. It's owned now. > Wouldn't it be easier to just write: %{_datadir}/bsd-games Instead of all those seperate entreis for files and dirs under it in the %files section? Anyways all MUST Fix items fixed: _approved_! > > Should Fix: > > ----------- > > * "# It looks like textutils became coreutils at some point. I'm not sure > > # what is needed from it, so I'm commenting it out until I can find out. > > #Requires: textutils" > In that case concider dropping these 3 lines from the spec? > > * Shouldn't the highscore files be marked %config(noreplace) ? > > I say no. If the high score file formats changes at any time then we want to > make sure that the old ones get removed. We could mark them as %config only, > but that seems pointless because the only reason to preserve the old scoreboard > files is if a migration tool is also provided to move it to the new format, and > I don't see that happening for any of these games. > Do you concider the changing of these files format likely? If you don't makr them %config(noreplace) the highscores will get reset on each package update, I don't think you / we want that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 08:46:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290846.k3T8kKb9004631@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-29 04:46 EST ------- There wasn't much discusion, so I'm going to "fix" this by doing things as suggested in my initial proposal to the list: So there we are 2 different ogg support for use with allegro support libraries both installing: /usr/lib/libalogg.so One of them installs: alogg.h And the other: alogg/alogg.h Which also seems like an accident waiting to happen. I'm thinking of solving this by: -give AllegroOGG a new soname: libAllegroOGG.so, or should I give them both a new name, and in that case what should I use for alogg? -putting all the header files of both in seperate dirs under include: /usr/include/allog/(alogg/alogg.h) /usr/include/AllegroOGG/(allogg.h) -modifying allog-config todo the right thing for alogg -use pkgconfig for AllegroOgg -patch AllegroOGG using programs to use pkgconfig. Currently only raidem can use AllegroOGG (I have a new version ready which adds ogg support as a replacement for the stripped out mp3 support, giving raidem its background music back). I'll post links to a new specfile and SRPM once I'm done, in the mean time I'm resetting this to FE-REVIEW :| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 09:10:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 05:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604290910.k3T9ALMA009096@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-04-29 05:10 EST ------- Thanks very much for the review Jason. The NEEDSPONSOR blocker is indeed incorrect ; I'll remove it and import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 10:17:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291017.k3TAHTwH021990@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-29 06:17 EST ------- I've opened Bug #190252 against PHP whch own %{_libdir]/php/pear about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 10:42:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291042.k3TAgokE027362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-04-29 06:42 EST ------- Thanks very much indeed for your comments Jason. You've raised a number of interesting points there. I'll take them each in turn. 1. Licensing (inclusion of license documents): fixed, though see also below about subpackages 2. Build on x86_64; I don't use this architecture but I have added --with-svn-lib=%_libdir which I think should fix it. Please give it a go. 3. ldconfig: done 4. autoconf: removed from BR; I don't think it's needed either; it's a leftover from the spec I originally cannibalised. 5. %check: the tests in src/tests/svncpp are now run Now onto the bigger issues: looking more closely, rapidsvn bundles (as you noted) libsvncpp.so*. This is a library which is not strictly related to rapidsvn, providing as it does an abstract C++ API for Subversion. Now, in an ideal world we would have svncpp as a totally separate package, but at the moment it is not distributed as such upstream; only as a bundled part of rapidsvn. However, it's quite forseeable that that might change (if, for example, other apps started linking to svncpp then it would quickly become annoying having it bundled with rapidsvn). So, we should package it reflecting the fact that it is functionally independent of rapidsvn. Therefore, my updated spec builds three separate packages: - svncpp (dynamic, versioned libsvncpp .sos) - svncpp-devel (headers and unversioned .so) - rapidsvn (GUI app linked to svncpp) This also neatly solves the issue of what to put in the License field and what license docs to include; svncpp and svncpp-devel are LGPL and marked as such and rapidsvn is GPL. An open question which I would appreciate advice on (PackageNamingGuidelines has none) is whether the svncpp package should be called "svncpp" or "libsvncpp". It's referred to as "svncpp" upstream but many other similar libraries are packaged named as "libXXX". I don't have any strong feelings either way. New spec/SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/rapidsvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/rapidsvn-0.9.1-2.src.rpm Tested and builds in mock i386. rpmlint is now quiet for the SRPM and all three output packages. There's a bit of an open question about what I should do with LICENSE.txt as this refers to all three packages (rapidsvn, svncpp, svncpp-devel). I could include it in all, but even then should it be patched to split off the bits relevant to each package? Again, advice welcome. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 11:41:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291141.k3TBf6Bn005353@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-29 07:40 EST ------- Problem solved: http://mpeters.us/PyX/PyX-0.8.1-3.fc5.src.rpm http://mpeters.us/PyX/PyX.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 11:41:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291141.k3TBfTSS005507@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-29 07:41 EST ------- I've just finished uploading a new version, locations are still the same: Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/gcompris.spec Files URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/gcompris-files.tar.gz Notting was changed except for the addition of Patch4 which fixes issue 2) as listed in the initial opening comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 11:46:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291146.k3TBk6Ti006439@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-29 07:45 EST ------- New version: * Sat Apr 20 2006 Hans de Goede 1.0.3-2 - Rename .so file from liballog.so(.0) to libAllegroOGG.so(.0) and put the headers in /usr/include/AllegroOGG to avoid any future conflicts with the (unpackaged) alogg library which unsurprisingly installs libalogg.so too. - Add a pkgconfig file to allow apps to get the proper CFLAGS and LIBS for this change. (bz 188625) Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/AllegroOGG.spec SRPM URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/AllegroOGG-1.0.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 12:33:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291233.k3TCXiYD013904@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-29 08:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Whats the point of macros such as %{__rm} and %{__make}? I have no idea, and always wondered this myself. I'm guessing at one time there was a policy to never invoke commands directly in spec files so everything can be overridden by redefining macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 13:11:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291311.k3TDBUsX020333@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 15:15:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291515.k3TFF1IQ009399@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-04-29 11:14 EST ------- Hi Neal, the two URLs return "404 Not Found" for me. Is this submission active? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 16:29:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291629.k3TGTnhV021573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-04-29 12:29 EST ------- Built OK in devel - job #8524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:04:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190231] Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291704.k3TH4AxC027690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190231 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-29 13:04 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:04:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190233] Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291704.k3TH4gjM027777@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190233 Bug 190233 depends on bug 190231, which changed state. Bug 190231 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190231 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:06:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291706.k3TH61hk027969@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-29 13:05 EST ------- You're right about the spec file, however, I am maintaining the core branch as well which has the filename anjuta.spec already. The idea is to have anjuta2 in rawhide (co-existing with anjuta) and when it's good and stable, drop anjuta and take anjuta2 to FC4 and 5. gnome-build is in BZ : #182320 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:08:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190236] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType - Parse a MIME Content-Type Header In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291708.k3TH8l9k028423@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType - Parse a MIME Content-Type Header https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190236 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-29 13:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:08:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190232] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291708.k3TH8sQu028445@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple - Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190232 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-29 13:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:12:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190237] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291712.k3THCEmD028951@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190237 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-29 13:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190233] Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291729.k3THTcNd031615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190233 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-04-29 13:29 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:44:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291744.k3THirDq002487@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-29 13:44 EST ------- Built successfully on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. However, I had to remove _smp_flags. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:45:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291745.k3THjFgI002564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 Bug 188176 depends on bug 188168, which changed state. Bug 188168 Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291745.k3THjmnS002684@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 Bug 188178 depends on bug 188168, which changed state. Bug 188168 Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 17:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291757.k3THvhuR004517@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-04-29 13:57 EST ------- Thanks for the review and the patches. My first patchset is in upstream svn and I reported your changes some minutes ago. I did not fixed the -debuginfo bug; IMO it is a minor issue and I am not sure about the impact in the build. Package built for devel branch (after adding a freetype-devel BR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 18:16:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291816.k3TIGTlF008289@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-04-29 14:16 EST ------- If that's the case I'd definately lose them. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 18:30:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291830.k3TIUEqJ011568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 14:30 EST ------- The problem is that while the specfile is called anjuta2.spec, the Name: of the generated package is still anjuta. It sounds like you want to call it anjuta2 and eventually add Obsoletes: anjuta. And of course the BR: gnome-build-devel which I can't satisfy is a major problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 18:31:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291831.k3TIVsL0012113@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 14:31 EST ------- Please ignore the last sentence I wrote, lest I seem an idiot. But you should have that bug block this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 19:19:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] New: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/raidem-music.spec SRPM URL: See below Description: Music created by Eric Hamilton (dilvie), which can be optionally installed besides the game raidem as background music. --- As usual (anybody to give me a decent ftp account somewhere?) with anything a bit large, sorry no SRPM because of my sucky ISP. Source 0, 2-3 can be downloaded fromupstream Source 4 is here: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/license.txt Source 1 is unfortunate only available in mp3 format so I've transcoded it, keeping all the id3tags intact. Unfortunate the result is to big to be uploaded as one file (my ISP has a max filesize limit of 3Mb GRRRR). Thus I've uploaded it in 2 parts: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/dilvie_-_up_in_ashes.ogg.1 http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/dilvie_-_up_in_ashes.ogg.2 To get the original back type in your download dir: cat dilvie_-_up_in_ashes.ogg.1 dilvie_-_up_in_ashes.ogg.2 > dilvie_-_up_in_ashes.ogg Sorry for the inconvient review. I promise the rest of the review should be a piece of cake / a walk in the park. --- Testing if you want to test this in another way then just playing the ogg's you'll need the unreleased raidem-0.3.1 from FE devel CVS. This is unreleased because in order to build 0.3.1 you'll need the unreleased AllegroOGG package, who's review is in bug 188625 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 19:21:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291921.k3TJLrat022214@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 19:22:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291922.k3TJM4a1022270@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 19:27:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604291927.k3TJRZ67023106@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-29 15:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > If that's the case I'd definately lose them. :) Done... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/liblo-0.23-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 20:21:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292021.k3TKLhlr032173@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-04-29 16:21 EST ------- In answer to comment #17: Well, the package doesn't mention the license as being STL, but look at: http://www.mcda.org/help/stl.html and then diff it vs the license in this package and the first part is identical, then this package has "...and that the name of Keith Packard not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific, written prior permission. Keith Packard makes no representations about the suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty." So I think it's much closer to the STL license than the MIT one. Any license gurus out there that can chime in? In refrence to comment #18: Which CVS repo are you looking at? I don't see any changes in the ones I looked at anytime recently (which might be after this release version I guess). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 20:49:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292049.k3TKn8Vt005741@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 16:49 EST ------- I have no issues with the svncpp name. I guess if you considered this to be an addon package for subversion you would call it subversion-cpp, but I'm not sure it fits into that category. I don't think you should go editing LICENSE.txt; it should be fine as is as long as it describes what is being licensed (which it does). As far as I can tell, the only remaining issue is this new rpmlint warning, which I've not encountered before so I'll include the full explanation: E: rapidsvn binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/rapidsvn ['/usr/lib64'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. No --disable-rpath in configure, but lots of one libtool and two g++ invocations that reference it. Unfortunately I'm not sure how to get rid of them; autoconf is completely opaque and hideous to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 21:25:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292125.k3TLPCVX011645@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-04-29 17:25 EST ------- Alright, I'm working on a full review. rpmlint output: rpmlint jack-audio-connection-kit-0.101.1-4.fc5.i386.rpm W: jack-audio-connection-kit no-version-in-last-changelog Remember to tag your changelog entries with the package version number, like so: * Thu Apr 27 2006 Andy Shevchenko - 0.101.1-4 W: jack-audio-connection-kit one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: jack-audio-connection-kit one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig I don't know why mock is complaining. You've got exactly whats in ScriptletSnippets. Ignore it? rpmlint jack-audio-connection-kit-devel-0.101.1-4.fc5.i386.rpm W: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel no-version-in-last-changelog Ditto. rpmlint jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients-0.101.1-4.fc5.i386.rpm W: jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients no-version-in-last-changelog Ditto. W: jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients no-documentation Ignorable. Also, I notice the man page for jackstart is getting installed even though the binary isn't. Looks like that's ultimately an upstream bug. And I see a %{__make} macro in there, as far as I know its useless, and its also inconsistent with the rest of the spec. Just use plain make. My preference would be to not use %{name} in source lines. And maybe not even in the subpackage Requires:. It should be unlikely that the package name would ever change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 21:50:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292150.k3TLoSMb016386@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 17:50 EST ------- Every recommendation outside of patching configure given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/RpathCheckBuildsys with no luck. export LIBTOOL=libtool didn't work; calling libtoolize --force didn't work (but maybe that wouldn't be enough to make it work). I even deleted every instance of -rpath from configure and aclocal.m4 and while g++ is never called with it, it still shows up in the final executable. I give up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 22:00:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292200.k3TM0Hrf017839@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-29 18:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > (In reply to comment #37) > > (In reply to comment #36) > Wouldn't it be easier to just write: > %{_datadir}/bsd-games Why yes, it would. > > In that case concider dropping these 3 lines from the spec? Done. > > > * Shouldn't the highscore files be marked %config(noreplace) ? > > > > I say no. If the high score file formats changes at any time then we want to > > make sure that the old ones get removed. We could mark them as %config only, > > but that seems pointless because the only reason to preserve the old scoreboard > > files is if a migration tool is also provided to move it to the new format, and > > I don't see that happening for any of these games. > > > > Do you concider the changing of these files format likely? If you don't makr > them %config(noreplace) the highscores will get reset on each package update, I > don't think you / we want that. I was under the mistaken impression that rpm would not touch files during an upgrade that hadn't changed from one release to the next, but it seems that's not the case for these scoreboard files. I'll fix these three minor issues before building. Thanks a bunch for the review. I know it was time consuming since this is like 40 packages all rolled into one. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 22:06:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189402] Review Request: bogofilter - Fast anti-spam filtering by Bayesian statistical analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292206.k3TM6iOq018847@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogofilter - Fast anti-spam filtering by Bayesian statistical analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189402 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-04-29 18:06 EST ------- a review: MUST items: OK - Rpmlint output. (none) OK - Package name. OK - Spec file name matches. OK - Package guidelines. OK - License. (GPL) OK - License field matches in spec. OK - License included in files OK - Spec in american english OK - Spec legible OK - Md5sum of source from upstream a1e201e544a3d9181b44b051b46435c3 bogofilter-1.0.2.tar.gz a1e201e544a3d9181b44b051b46435c3 bogofilter-1.0.2.tar.gz.1 OK - Compiles and builds on one arch at least. (builds fine in devel mock and fc5) OK - All required buildrequires included? OK - Owns all directories it creates. OK - No duplicate files in %files listing. OK - Permissions on files correct. OK - Clean section correct. OK - Macros consistant. OK - Code not content. OK - Doesn't own any files/dirs that are already owned by others. Minor issues: 1. The Source url doesn't work for me... dl.sf.net doesn't appear to work quite the same as dl.sourceforge.net. http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/bogofilter/bogofilter-1.0.2.tar.gz works here. It's a shame that it can't be built with all the possible database backends and let it be a run time choice which to use. I don't see any blockers, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 22:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292217.k3TMHDUh020419@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-04-29 18:17 EST ------- Hmm, this doesn't seem to show up on x86; rpmlint is quiet. I also know nothing about this issue other than what I've read on the page you cited, so I can't help unfortunately :( The page you cited calls it a "minor" issue (for standard RPATHs) so I presume it doesn't necessarily stand in the way of inclusion. Perhaps one to throw at extras-list and see if anyone else can help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 22:20:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189725] Review Request: ifolder3-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292220.k3TMKjMt020941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ifolder3-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189725 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-04-29 18:20 EST ------- With drawning review for now. this needs a lot more work than expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 22:28:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189725] Review Request: ifolder3-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292228.k3TMSPHq022123@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ifolder3-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189725 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 22:37:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181369] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292237.k3TMbV9j024073@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181369 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 22:50:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292250.k3TMoqB3026442@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2006-04-29 18:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Including chan_bluetooth would also be good. chan_bluetooth is of questionable quality AFAIK, so I don't know if this is wise to include. Couldn't this be in a separate package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 29 23:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604292321.k3TNL4Fg030978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-29 19:20 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 00:42:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300042.k3U0gYIu012561@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-29 20:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Strange .. it looks like the rpm was built on a machine that had > Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] set to /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8. Are you sure > the rpm wasn't built against a newer ruby package (e.g., the new 1.8.4-4 test > packages that Akira Tagoh has put out) ? Those moved site_ruby from %_libdir to > %_libdir/ruby. That's what I get for building rawhide on a FC5 box. My mock logs actually show 1.8.4-4.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 01:52:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300152.k3U1qSoC023470@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 21:52 EST ------- edhill on IRC pointed out that I had missed an -rpath call in src/svncpp/Makefile.in; removing it breaks the build in a rather odd way; the library is build but it seems some libtool thing doesn't get generated (.libs/libsvncpp.lai) and things die. So I really am out of options. I'll ask extras-list if this can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 03:00:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300300.k3U30S1l001982@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-29 23:00 EST ------- Most of the initial review still holds true, so I'll only comment on the new changes: * pkgconfig file part of -devel * header file and .so (no suffix) part of -devel * Package named correctly (Ogg -> OGG is fine, and even matches upstream better) rpmlint output: W: AllegroOGG-devel no-documentation ...which is ok to ignore since there is no -devel specific documentation and -devel requires the base package, which provides the package documentation. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 04:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 00:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300453.k3U4r3cQ020673@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-30 00:52 EST ------- FYI, theres an open ticket for the mkhowto issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177349 PyChart is working around it by including a copy of Python's Doc directory. I see no problems with simply shipping the formatted manual from upstream, but you should probably treat it as any other upstream source and provide a full URL. Issues: The build fails on x86_64 (both FC5 and development): gcc -pthread -shared -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.4/pyx/pykpathsea/pykpathsea.o -lkpathsea -o build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.4/pyx/pykpathsea/_pykpathsea.so /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.0/../../../../lib64/libkpathsea.a(tex-file.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `kpse_format_info' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.0/../../../../lib64/libkpathsea.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.12911 (%build) I'm afraid I have no idea at all what that means, except for "recompile with -fPIC", and -fPIC already on all of the gcc command lines so I assume it's complaining about /usr/lib644/libkpathsea.a. A quick search leads to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150085. Anyway, it builds fine on i386, so you'll need to ExcludeArch: x86_64 at least (no way to test PPC, sorry) and then open a bug on the failed x86_64 build and have it block FE-ExcludeArch-x64 (and have 150085 block it). rpmlint complains: E: PyX non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pyx/graph/axis/tick.py 0644 (and 41 additional complaints about other files) These files all contain #!/blah/python lines. Those scripts aren't intended to be executable, so those shebang lines need to be removed. Note that they aren't consistent; graph/axis/timeaxis.py is the only .py file not to have such a line. This is the only blocker that I can see. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included in the package. * source files match upstream: bfab7bbc4f3442c946f489133df515f0 manual.pdf bfab7bbc4f3442c946f489133df515f0 manual.pdf-srpm 5e751cef8d62774a6fc659cc9a03c231 PyX-0.8.1.tar.gz 5e751cef8d62774a6fc659cc9a03c231 PyX-0.8.1.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. O package builds in mock (development, i386) but fails on x86_64. X rpmlint complains about errant shebang lines in all but one .py file. * final provides and requires are sane. * shared libraries are present, but internal to python so no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * .pyo files are properly %ghosted. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; no test suite. * code, not content. * documentation is not exactly small, but not large enough that a -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 05:14:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300514.k3U5E69d023597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-30 01:14 EST ------- Blocking FE-Legal for the license issue. To be explicit, the documentation for this package is under something called the "Free Document Dissemination License V1" http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/licence/v1/fddl.html which allows only limited types of modification. Note that any issue relating to the manual is not a blocker for this package, since the subission does not include it. It would still be useful to have a ruling on the license so that the manual could be included later if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 05:23:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300523.k3U5Nw0T025106@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-30 01:23 EST ------- Has anyone contacted roger at firthworks.com about the license? That would seem to be the proper contact address these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 06:45:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300645.k3U6jPpj006241@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 02:45 EST ------- Jason, I would be more then happy to contact that address, I'm waiting for a comment from Chris on this, does he want me to contact that address or will he do so himself? Chris? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 06:55:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300655.k3U6tDjC007635@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 02:55 EST ------- Thanks (twice!), Imported & Build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 07:13:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300713.k3U7D2Xj010698@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 03:12 EST ------- rpmlint output: E: gcompris hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/menu - This is a bogus warning. rpmlint is complaining about the src rpm without realizing that this file is being removed, not included. W: gcompris-devel no-dependency-on gcompris - This is ok by design. -devel requires -libs so that it doesn't need to pull in rather large (and unnecessary) base package. W: gcompris-devel no-documentation W: gcompris-libs no-documentation - This can be ignored. The developers documentation is integrated with the base package's documentation. W: gcompris-flags no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-da no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-de no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-en no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-es no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-eu no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-fi no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-fr no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-hu no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-it no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-nl no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-pt no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-ru no-documentation W: gcompris-sound-sv no-documentation - These can be ignored. There's no need for documentation for localized sound/flag files. MUST ==== * GPL license ok, license file included * Package and spec file named appropriately * Spec file legible and in Am. English (except for the localized parts) * Sources for the review came from upstream: d80e55da21170a98d671c98b3e582cc3 SOURCES/gcompris-7.4.tar.gz * Builds in mock on devel-i386, devel-x86_64 * Locales handled appropriately * ldconfig called for shared libs in -libs subpackage * Not relocatable * Owns directories that it creates * No duplicate %files * Contains code and permissible content * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned correctly in %install and %clean * File permissions appear to be ok * headers, .so, and pkgconfig files in -devel * -devel requires -libs, not base (this is acceptable, see above) * .la files not included * .desktop files installed correctly * No need for -doc subpackage SHOULD ========= * Consider adding Requires: tuxpaint for the tuxpaint launcher I did a quick check of the english/german sounds on a handful of the games and it worked with no obvious problems. No blockers found. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 07:20:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300720.k3U7KYxX012235@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-30 03:20 EST ------- Waiting for Bug #190252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 07:21:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300721.k3U7LEUB012418@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-04-30 03:21 EST ------- Waiting for Bug #190252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 07:29:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300729.k3U7TNKx014119@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 03:29 EST ------- Before someone start reviewing here is a new version which fixes the following: -missing Requires: raidem >= 0.3.1 -missing Buildarch: noarch The new specfile is available at: Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/raidem-music.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 07:41:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300741.k3U7fLm9017474@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 07:41:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300741.k3U7fiDX017653@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 Bug 190267 depends on bug 188625, which changed state. Bug 188625 Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 08:05:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300805.k3U85417022641@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl CC|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 04:05 EST ------- Still needs a bit of work, I'll do a full review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 08:32:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300832.k3U8W8eE013330@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-30 04:32 EST ------- Note on documentation - full path url is in comment about Source1 I changed the name of the source for the src.rpm because the upstream filename was way to generic - manual.pdf I have fixed the rpmlint error - the way I fixed it was simply to run sed on all non executable .py scripts and change ^#! to ## Is that acceptable or would refer the enture shebang lines just be removed? I think I have temporarily fixed it for x86_64 by simply not building the kpathsea C extension for x86_64 - the kpathsea part of the package should still work on x86_64, just with a performance hit. New src.rpm: http://mpeters.us/PyX/PyX-0.8.1-4.fc5.src.rpm New specfile: http://mpeters.us/PyX/PyX.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 08:53:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604300853.k3U8rtm7018166@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 04:53 EST ------- Well thats a nice start: [hans at shalem ~]$ rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ctapi-cyberjack.spec error: parse error in expression error: /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ctapi-cyberjack.spec:15: parseExpressionBoolean returns -1 error: Package has no %description: ctapi-cyberjack This is caused by the following lines in the spec: %if %{dist} == "FC4" %define readers_dir %{_libdir}/readers %else %define readers_dir %(pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir) %endif I was already planning on adding a "MUST Fix" item for those, but not this soon in the review. This is not the Fedora Extras way of doing things to avoid %if filled specfiles we have one specfile per release in our CVS. Reviews should always happen against the devel release, but in most cases (this one included) the latest stable is fine too. So for this review please target FC-5 and FC-5 only then once your package is approved and imported (into the devel branch where all imports happen) you can request CVS branches for FC-5 and FC-4 and then change the specfile for FC-4 . It is ok to add a comment to the specfile submitted for review about nescesarry changes for older releases. So you could change the above lines to: # define this to %{_libdir}/readers when building on FC-4 %define readers_dir %(pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir) Since it looks like I won't be able todo a full review right now after all because of lack of time and because there is alot to fix in a first glance, here is a quick and probably incomplete list of "MUST Fix" items: MUST Fix ======== * Don't use release conditional %if constructs, instead target FC-5 with the spec submitted for review (see above). * Don't use German in the specfile not even in comments * Remove the unused "%define _realrelease 1" * Replace "4%{dist}" with "4%{?dist}" watch the ? * Have you tried replacing "make" with "make %{?_smp_mflags}" ? Ifso please add a comment that make breaks with %{?_smp_mflags} if not please add %{?_smp_mflags}. * When linking libctapi-cyberjack.so it doesn't get passed an soname flag, the ld -x --shared -lusb -o libctapi-cyberjack.so ctn_list.o cjctapi_beep.o ... command should get passed "-soname libctapi-cyberjack.so.0" * When installing libctapi-cyberjack.so you install it as libctapi-cyberjack.so.%{version} this is not correct you should install it as libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 (matching the -soname above). When the ABI of the library changes (which it will probably never will) you change both the -soname and the install command to libctapi-cyberjack.so.1, when the ABI changes again to .2 etc. * Don't use a .so.%{version} install for the ifd, this is a plugin which always gets dlopen-ed and as such should be installed as a plain .so, thus you also do not need to add -soname to the link command for the ifd only for the ctapi lib. * libcyberjack_ifd.so gets staticly linked against libctapi-cyberjack, please make this dynamic (currently the link command includes: "../ctapi/libctapi-cyberjack.a" replace this with "-L../ctapi -llibctapi-cyberjack"). * drop the "Requires: %{name} = %{version}" for PC-SC subpackage, currently it is staticly linked and the dyn link which should be there will lead to an autodependency generated by rpm. * Rename the "PC-SC" subpakcage to pcsc to match the way pcsc is written in other packages names (pcsc-lite, pcsc-tools, pcsc-perl) * Don't create the docdir and install the docs there just name the docs as they are releative to the builddir afyter %doc, rpmbuild will copy them for you and create the docdir itself. And some personal preferences of mine, not obligatory in anyway: * Don't put a "," between BuildRequires whitespace alone is enough. * Don't use %{buildroot} because %{buildroot}%{_datadir} is hard to read, instead use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir} is IMHO much easier to read. Phew, long list. Good luck fixing all these, most are trivial to fix though and don't get scared away by this you picked a hard package to start with and as package more software your reviews will go more and more smoothly. Please post a new version addressing all the above MUST Fix items, then I'll take a second stab at doing a Full review and hopefully approving your first package. Feel free to ask questions about the above if there is anything you don't understand or disagree with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 10:24:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301024.k3UAOdc0003096@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-04-30 06:24 EST ------- So I have try to fix it but I have found an big bug in rpmbuild:( to support FC4 and FC5 I have written this: #use this for FC4 #%define readers_dir XXXX #use this for FC5 #%define readers_dir YYYY but rpmbuild ignore the # so when remove the # for FC4 the variable readers_dir ist not XXXX it is YYYY -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 10:55:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301055.k3UAt4Bp009145@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-04-30 06:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > W: jack-audio-connection-kit one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig > W: jack-audio-connection-kit one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig > > I don't know why mock is complaining. You've got exactly whats in > ScriptletSnippets. Ignore it? I believe it will stop complaining if you write one line commands like so: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig ScriptletSnippets should probably be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 11:10:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301110.k3UBANha011450@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 07:10 EST ------- Known problem / "feature" Its not really a bug but it is anoying the part of rpmbuild doing % macro expansions doesn;t know about comments. If you want tuse use a % in a comment write %% -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 11:10:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301110.k3UBANWw011451@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 07:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > SHOULD > ========= > * Consider adding Requires: tuxpaint for the tuxpaint launcher > Ah, I thought they had build their own clone / copy I didn'y know it was just a launcher, I've added the requirement. > I did a quick check of the english/german sounds on a handful of the games and > it worked with no obvious problems. > I may hope so this one has taken me a lot of time :) > No blockers found. > > APPROVED > Thanks! Imported & Build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 11:52:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301152.k3UBqQom019209@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-04-30 07:52 EST ------- So the next try I hope I have fixed all Here the URL: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=155466&package_id=186639&release_id=413834 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 11:52:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171314] Review Request: gtkhtml36 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301152.k3UBqXe0019235@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |3.6.2-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 11:54:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190086] Review Request: rman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301154.k3UBsm2s019681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190086 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 11:56:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301156.k3UBumCR019915@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-30 07:56 EST ------- Updated .spec incorporating these changes at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/hevea/hevea.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 12:35:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 08:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188435] Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301235.k3UCZfhE026491@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188435 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From splinux at fedoraproject.org 2006-04-30 08:35 EST ------- The spec file was reorganised. Spec Name or Url: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/glibrary/glibrary.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/glibrary/glibrary-1.0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 13:08:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301308.k3UD82N2031734@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-04-30 09:08 EST ------- for getting the package to build without rpath problems on x86_64 you have to add autoreconf --force --install a line before %configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 13:41:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301341.k3UDf7HL005256@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mpeters at mac.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-30 09:41 EST ------- Blocker: [mpeters at atlantis SPECS]$ md5sum hevea-1.08.tar.gz 073c92c9408a9679a397ce65a076c796 hevea-1.08.tar.gz [mpeters at atlantis SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/hevea-1.08.tar.gz 1a93c1924b817e54531abf74f0b34d4b ../SOURCES/hevea-1.08.tar.gz It seems that the md5sum from the src.rpm does not match upstream md5sum. 073c92c9408a9679a397ce65a076c796 is the upstream. I unpackaged both and did a diff: -- diff -ur hevea-1.08-upstream/latexscan.mll hevea-1.08/latexscan.mll --- hevea-1.08-upstream/latexscan.mll 2005-11-22 04:27:56.000000000 -0800 +++ hevea-1.08/latexscan.mll 2005-03-08 07:15:03.000000000 -0800 @@ -3253,7 +3253,7 @@ -let just_put c lb = Dest.put_char c +let just_put c lb = Dest.put_char '-' ;; def_code "\\@hevea at amper" do_amper ; -- The current upstream should be used. Suggest: In %install - mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/hevea mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} are not needed. make install will create the necessary directories. Good: * rpmlint clean * proper naming * spec file name matches %{name} * package meets packaging guidelines * License is QPL, License matches packaged LICENSE file. * Spec file written in American English * Spec file is understandable * Package succesfully builds in mock on FC5 x86 * No locales/shared libraries to worry about * No static/libtool files * Package not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates * No duplicate files * No duplicate files * Proper file permissions, proper %defattr(...) in spec file * Package contains code * No need for separate doc package * %doc files not needed for runtime * No header/other devel package files to worry about * No gui package needing a desktop file -=- Please redownload the upstream source, verify that the md5sum is 073c92c9408a9679a397ce65a076c796 and create a new src.rpm Other than that - unless Jason Tibbitts has objections, I would be willing to approve. The documentation licensing is an interesting point, but since it isn't packaged, it is not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 13:44:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301344.k3UDiPbD005836@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-30 09:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128411) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128411&action=view) modified spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 13:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301344.k3UDinEg005898@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-30 09:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > Other than that - unless Jason Tibbitts has objections, I would be willing to > approve. um, typo - should read unless Jason Tibbitts or Patrice Dumas (or other reviewers) have objections, I would be willing to approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 13:55:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301355.k3UDtF6L007592@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-30 09:55 EST ------- 1. I modified the spec file so that I can find my way around more easily. You are free to use it. 2. I think the documentation package should install the documentation in gtk2hs-doc-%{version} or ghc-gtk2hs-doc-%{version}, since all directories in /usr/share/doc are versioned. 3. /usr/lib/ghc should be owned by the packages that install into it, otherwise it hangs around, if all packages have been removed. 4. Rather than remove the .o files in %preun, they should be %ghost'ed 5. The package.conf.old file should also be %ghost'ed by the ghc package otherwise, a complete uninstall leaves something hanging around. 6. The demos should also be packaged. 7. rpmlint complains about non-devel packages requiring devel packages. This should be ignored, otherwise we would have to append -devel to all packages. 8. rpmlint: "W: ghc642-glade summary-ended-with-dot Haskell binding of glade for gtk2hs." Remove the dot. 9. Currently, if someones builds a package requiring the gconf part of gtk2hs, he will need to require ghc642-gconf, even if he doesn't care about the exact version of ghc. Requiring ghc-gtk2hs does the right thing, but only for gtk, glib and cairo. Would "Provides: ghc-gconf" etc... work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 14:24:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301424.k3UEOh0T012548@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-04-30 10:24 EST ------- Jamie and me are discussing my patch now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 14:37:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301437.k3UEbRka015260@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-30 10:37 EST ------- Strange. This looks like upstream did a silent fix without upping the release number. Anyway, new srpm with 073c92c9408a9679a397ce65a076c796 hevea-1.08.tar.gz is uploaded to http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/hevea/hevea-1.08-4.src.rpm Spec, which is unchanged, is at http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/hevea/hevea.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 14:56:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301456.k3UEutWu018851@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2006-04-30 10:56 EST ------- Since smokeping runs as a daemon, I guess the smokeping binary should be in /usr/sbin instead of /usr/bin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 15:14:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301514.k3UFEmXZ021670@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-30 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Strange. > This looks like upstream did a silent fix without upping the release number. That's what I figured probably happened. [mpeters at atlantis ~]$ md5sum hevea-upstream-1.08.tar.gz 073c92c9408a9679a397ce65a076c796 hevea-upstream-1.08.tar.gz [mpeters at atlantis ~]$ md5sum rpm/SOURCES/hevea-1.08.tar.gz 073c92c9408a9679a397ce65a076c796 rpm/SOURCES/hevea-1.08.tar.gz Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 15:50:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301550.k3UFoh0w027954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-04-30 11:50 EST ------- No objections from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 16:38:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301638.k3UGcoeq003516@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 16:39:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301639.k3UGduKj003905@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gemi at bluewin.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 17:13:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301713.k3UHDqRc009287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190252 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 17:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301714.k3UHEwFE009557@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 ------- Additional Comments From chris at chrisgrau.com 2006-04-30 13:14 EST ------- Sorry about the silence. I'll contact the author today. Thanks for the ping guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 17:40:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301740.k3UHeMYn014378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 13:40 EST ------- Erm: [hans at shalem ~]$ rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ctapi-cyberjack.spec error: File /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ctapi-cyberjack_MakefileCtAPI.patch: No such file or directory Thats why usually wy prefer SRPM's for reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 18:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301800.k3UI0smc017756@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-04-30 14:00 EST ------- OK here the source rpm it contains the code for FC5 and the remarks for FC4. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-6.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 18:26:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188496] Review Request: PyQt-qscintilla In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301826.k3UIQXRH023975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt-qscintilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188496 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-04-30 14:26 EST ------- We can/will just use the same source redhat/fedora(core) does when building PyQt-qscintilla. Re: rawhide breakage That's ok, rawhide was upgraded to PyQt-3.16 recently anyway. Whoever wants to review this can do so against the FC-5 package here, or I can make a rawhide one for PyQt-3.16 too. (I'll have to do that eventually anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 19:53:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604301953.k3UJrqPL008221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 15:53 EST ------- MUST ==== * Package named appropriately * License (CC) ok * Spec file legible and in Am. English * No BR: needed * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Owns the directory that it creates * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where it should be * File permissions ok * No duplicate %files * Contains no code, but acceptible content (game data) * No -devel package needed * No .desktop file needed SUGGEST ======= * Slightly modified %description: "Music created by Eric Hamilton (dilvie) for the game Raid'em" The files play fine with xmms. I was unable to test them with the CVS version of raidem due to problems with the raidem package itself: "Error loading base datafiles." I'll take your word that raidem will load/play these files correctly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 20:09:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302009.k3UK9Ta6010446@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-30 16:09 EST ------- Missing some things when building against developement: No Package Found for gnome-libs-devel No Package Found for gtkhtml-devel No Package Found for libglade-devel >= 2.0.1 No Package Found for gal-devel No Package Found for oaf-devel I'm not too familiar with Gnome devel packaging, but you'll probably want to change to the lastest gtkhtml3-devel, and you'll have to change libglade-devel to libglade2-devel to meet the version requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 20:30:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302030.k3UKULa1013876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-04-30 16:30 EST ------- Couple of quick notes: 1. The handling of the desktop file is incorrect. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 2. Unnecessary BuildRequires: krb5-devel (provided by openssl-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 20:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302048.k3UKm0j0017636@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190252 OtherBugsDependingO|190252 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 20:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302050.k3UKoZ9P017984@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 16:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The files play fine with xmms. I was unable to test them with the CVS > version of raidem due to problems with the raidem package itself: > "Error loading base datafiles." > Hmm, thats strange are you sure you've the latest CVS? I did have the same problem 2 days ago, but that should be fixed now? Could you do a rpm -ql raidem and a strace and attach both? It seems that the latest raidem build for devel wasn't pushed to the mirrors yet so I can't test that and my local build works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 20:57:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302057.k3UKvKE7019070@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 16:57 EST ------- Sorry, no more time (today) for a full review. I did build it and ran it through rpmlint: W: ctapi-cyberjack strange-permission ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8.tar.bz2 0744 W: ctapi-cyberjack strange-permission ctapi-cyberjack.spec 0600 You should fix these, easy. E: ctapi-cyberjack library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 Hmm, bad error! Probably something wrong with the link command I can look into this one for you if you want, just let me know. W: ctapi-cyberjack devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so That should be fixed, easy. E: ctapi-cyberjack library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 E: ctapi-cyberjack library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 2 more which you should fix. W: ctapi-cyberjack-devel no-documentation No problem E: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc library-not-linked-against-libc /libcyberjack_ifd.so Again probably the strange ld invocation, let me know if you need help W: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/reader.conf.d/cyberjack.conf Amke tbis %config(noreplace) W: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc no-documentation No problem E: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/reader.conf.d/cyberjack.conf E: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc script-without-shellbang /etc/reader.conf.d/cyberjack.conf The second one is becayse of the first one, change the mode of this to 644. I think a new version fixing this before the fullreview is a good idea, don't hesitate if you need help with the not linked to libc errors, that should be easy to fix for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:04:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302104.k3UL44tH020123@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 17:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > MUST > ==== > [...] > * Contains no code, but acceptible content (game data) I'm starting to rethink this one. These ogg files are not required to play the game, and aren't part of the upstream source. The guidelines state: # Game levels are not considered content, since games without levels would be non functional. # Sound or graphics included with the source tarball that the program or theme uses (or the documentation uses) are acceptable. and specifically says that ogg/mp3 files are not acceptable. Let me get the opinion of f-e-l on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302109.k3UL9kkp020959@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-30 17:09 EST ------- No objection, but there is a typo in %post -p /usr/bin/texhas (missing h) And another in the summary, I believe it should be: HEVEA is a quite complete and fast LATEX to HTML translator. HEVEA renders symbols by using the so-called HTML "entites", which modern browsers display correctly most of the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:12:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302112.k3ULCZPi021395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 17:12 EST ------- Erm, I think you're reading this to literal, the .ogg files in this package are linked to from the download page of upstream: http://home.exetel.com.au/tjaden/raidem/download.html They are not some randomly picked ogg files, they are _the_ background music for raidem. Don't tell me that I have to ask upstream to make a special tarball for me with these included because the guidelines say so? About the explicit saying that mp3 and ogg files are not acceptable, I believe this is to discourage people from packaging stand alone collections of music and is not a hard forbidden item, otherwise monkey-bubble and gcompris would have to have all their ogg's removed leaving them severely crippled. But if you're not sure feel free to post this to f-e-l. I'm just trying to change your mind before we get a flamefest there :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:15:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302115.k3ULFcCu021849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 17:15 EST ------- p.s. I already started the import and that darn import script seems to have decided to drop all the ogg's in CVS instead of in the lookaside cache, ouch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:22:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302122.k3ULMilR023039@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 17:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > But if you're not sure feel free to post this to f-e-l. I'm just trying to > change your mind before we get a flamefest there :) I agree that it should be acceptable, but I don't think the guidelines are crystal clear in this case. The guidelines also state "If you are unsure if something is considered approved content, ask on fedora-extras-list." I'd rather get f-e-l's opinion and have this flamefest now instead of later when someone discovers a package full of ogg files. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:24:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302124.k3ULOdEa023327@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-30 17:24 EST ------- Nope. ld -shared -o libmgmp.so intinf.o /usr/lib/libgmp.so ld: /usr/lib/libgmp.so: No such file: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:27:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190304] New: Review Request: mtd-utils Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190304 Summary: Review Request: mtd-utils Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/mtd-utils/mtd-utils.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/mtd-utils/mtd-utils-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Utilities for dealing with MTD (flash) devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:29:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302129.k3ULTgth024144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-30 17:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) Andreas - can you fix both of those before the import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:31:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302131.k3ULVBgq024536@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-30 17:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > Andreas - can you fix both of those before the import? er, too late - can you fix them post import? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:39:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302139.k3ULdDaW026374@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 17:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128423) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128423&action=view) rpm -ivh output Note the error during the installation. I'm not sure why that is happening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:43:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302143.k3ULhv5L027288@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 17:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128424) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128424&action=view) rpm -ql raidem output Note that even though it says /usr/share/raidem/... is part of the package, this directory doesn't actually get created. Other packages have no problem creating things in /usr/share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:45:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302145.k3ULjJm7027412@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 17:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128425) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128425&action=view) strace output from raidem It's clear from the strace output that it's dying due to the missing /usr/share/raidem files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 21:48:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302148.k3ULm4Jd027917@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-30 17:47 EST ------- Hmm, disk full / filesys corrupt? Did you check dmesg output? Have you tried setenforce 0? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 23:26:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190308] New: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190308 Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PPI.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PPI-1.112-1.src.rpm Description: Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl (without perl). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 23:32:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302332.k3UNWi84012832@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-04-30 19:32 EST ------- *bummer* Fixed post import, and enqueued again. Closing, NEXTRELEASE And thx for the review guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 23:55:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189824] Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302355.k3UNt2tC017221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gemi at bluewin.ch OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-04-30 19:54 EST ------- First the good news: no complaints from rpmlint. Now for the nitpicks:-) 1. The doc directory properly belong in the -devel package, since it is API documentation. 2. In %description I would use LASi instead of libLASi since that is the name. 3. The -devel package needs Requires: pango-devel and freetype-devel These are included in LASi.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 30 23:56:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200604302356.k3UNuo6B017529@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-30 19:56 EST ------- Found the problem: there's a bad line in the %build section: %define _datadir /use/share This should be '/usr/share', not '/use/share'. It would be better to remove those two %define lines and just set datadir on the configure line: %configure --datadir=%{_datadir}/%{name} With that fix raidem installs fine and I was able to verify that the game loads and plays the music with no problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.