[Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 14 07:30:57 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libGLw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974
pertusus at free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pertusus at free.fr
------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-04-14 03:30 EST -------
Some quick comments after looking at the spec:
* It would be better to have your real name on the bug report.
Not a big deal, it is in the spec anyway.
* the Buildroot is no the right one
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1
* no need to conditionalize openmotif support, it should always
be true in fedora extras
* the non free file shouldn't be distributed. what I do in such
cases is provide with a script in SourceXX that unpack the upstream
tarball, remove the offending files and repack, such that a reviewer
can easily reproduce what you did in the SOURCES directory. An example
where I do that is grads (with the script grads-remove-files and the
list of files grads-removed-files-list) although you could do more simply
since you only have one file to remove.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list