[Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-04-15 02:49 EST -------
One warning from the tests; from a quick code inspection I think this is an
upstream bug.

+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/01_Log-Message-Config....ok
t/02_Log-Message...........Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at
t/02_Log-Message.t line 87.
ok
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=34,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr +  0.04 csys =  0.18 CPU)

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   f04298e81488a5a39930fd417d47656e  Log-Message-0.01.tar.gz
   f04298e81488a5a39930fd417d47656e  Log-Message-0.01.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.