[Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974





------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2006-04-20 00:18 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Here is the new srpm:
> http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/hugs98-2005.03-1.fc5.src.rpm

Thanks.

I think buildrequires libXt-devel covers libICE-devel and libSM-devel,
and also freeglut-devel pulls in mesa-libGL-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel,
and libX11-devel requires xorg-x11-proto-devel anyway.  libX11-devel seems
sufficient for HsXlib and AFAICT libXt is only checked for in configure
but not actually included by any of the library sources.

Also better to keep openal-devel around for when HOpenal gets updated
(ghc-6.4.2 includes a newer version apparently).  And it builds on fc4
anyway.

> * I moved the demos into /usr/share/doc. I also remove the
>   Makefile which doesn't make sense in this context.

Good.

> * I split off the packages x11, opengl, glut and hgl. I hope
>   I got the dependencies right. I used lowercase names, because
>   I find it aesthetically more pleasing :-)

Great. :)

> * I make the demos package depend on hugs98-glut and hugs98-hgl,
>   since there are demos that use them. I wouldn't want to
>   further split the demos package.

Ok.

Btw what is "touch src/stamp-h.in" needed for?  Also seems to me
"make install" is good enough, do the docs really need to be installed
separately?

Otherwise it looks very good to me, thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.