[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404





------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com  2006-04-23 13:38 EST -------
OK - I have submitted the package, updated the owners.list file and requested
CVS branches - can't do more until that happens. 

However, and related to comment #16, the package naming issue oddity came up again. 

To recap, the SRPM is called muse-version.srpm, and it generates:

muse-version.rpm 
emacs-muse-version.noarch.rpm
emacs-muse-el-version.noarch.rpm
xemacs-muse-version.noarch.rpm
xemacs-muse-el-version.noarch.rpm

So, the question is, what should I have used for the module name in owners.list
? I entered "emacs-muse", but on reflection I perhaps should have entered
"muse". The issue then is that the module name no longer has the emacs- or
xemacs- part in it, as required by the fedora-extras guidelines, even though
(some of) the rpms do. In short, the fedora-extras guidelines fail for "addon"
packages for sources which generate add-ons for two different programs (in this
case emacs and xemacs). 

Thoughts?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.