[Bug 189952] Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-04-26 00:11 EST -------
Issues:
The manpage is executable for some reason.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named and is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible and included in the package.
* source files match upstream:
   b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0  metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz
   b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0  metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns no (non %doc) directories.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
X file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
O No test suite, so no %check.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.