[Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 27 15:06:55 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071
------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-04-27 11:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Something like:
>
> %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo
> `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")}
Well, except that defining _texmf would in this case cause an error as well
unless configure was patched to take it as an arguement (which I don't think is
necessary) - I guess in this case expecting to support building against modified
tetex environments might be a bit much because of the upstream configure script
which looks for a specific file and doesn't take a texmf as a switch.
>
> That makes sense but then it would imply to Require: tetex-doc. That would
> mean that a 40 KB package could potencially require an 100 MB package. I don't
> think this is worth it. :-)
/usr/bin/texdoc is owned by tetex.
The potential problem is who owns the directories within the tex documentation
tree if tetex-doc isn't installed - but other packages just own it themselves.
Since it is just the man page, and available as a man page, it isn't that big of
a deal.
>
> Actually I think that dvipost requires a tex installation, there is nothing
> exclusive from tetex. That was the reason why I have proposed dvipost and not
> tetex-dvipost.
>
> If you feel strongly about this I will rename it.
On fedora - tetex is what provides tex.
There are other examples of this (in core)
[mpeters at atlantis Desktop]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/dvips
tetex-dvips-3.0-17
[mpeters at atlantis Desktop]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/xdvi
tetex-xdvi-3.0-17
It also makes it a little easier to find when browsing repoview for tetex boltons.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list