[Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Apr 29 08:35:24 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-04-29 04:35 EST -------
(In reply to comment #37)
> (In reply to comment #36)
>
> > MUST Fix:
> > ---------
> > * Package must own /usr/share/bsd-games
>
> Good catch. It's owned now.
>
Wouldn't it be easier to just write:
%{_datadir}/bsd-games
Instead of all those seperate entreis for files and dirs under it in the %files
section? Anyways all MUST Fix items fixed: _approved_!
> > Should Fix:
> > -----------
> > * "# It looks like textutils became coreutils at some point. I'm not sure
> > # what is needed from it, so I'm commenting it out until I can find out.
> > #Requires: textutils"
>
In that case concider dropping these 3 lines from the spec?
> > * Shouldn't the highscore files be marked %config(noreplace) ?
>
> I say no. If the high score file formats changes at any time then we want to
> make sure that the old ones get removed. We could mark them as %config only,
> but that seems pointless because the only reason to preserve the old scoreboard
> files is if a migration tool is also provided to move it to the new format, and
> I don't see that happening for any of these games.
>
Do you concider the changing of these files format likely? If you don't makr
them %config(noreplace) the highscores will get reset on each package update, I
don't think you / we want that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list