[Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr -  X11 composite manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-04-29 16:21 EST -------
In answer to comment #17: 

Well, the package doesn't mention the license as being STL, but look at: 
http://www.mcda.org/help/stl.html

and then diff it vs the license in this package and the first part is identical,
then this package has 

"...and that the name of Keith Packard not be used in
advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without
specific, written prior permission.  Keith Packard makes no
representations about the suitability of this software for any purpose.  It
is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty."

So I think it's much closer to the STL license than the MIT one. 

Any license gurus out there that can chime in? 

In refrence to comment #18: 

Which CVS repo are you looking at? I don't see any changes in the ones I looked
at anytime recently (which might be after this release version I guess). 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.