[Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-04-29 16:49 EST -------
I have no issues with the svncpp name.  I guess if you considered this to be an
addon package for subversion you would call it subversion-cpp, but I'm not sure
it fits into that category.

I don't think you should go editing LICENSE.txt; it should be fine as is as long
as it describes what is being licensed (which it does).

As far as I can tell, the only remaining issue is this new rpmlint warning,
which I've not encountered before so I'll include the full explanation:

E: rapidsvn binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/rapidsvn ['/usr/lib64']
The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a
bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so
makes it difficult to move libraries around.  Most likely you will find a
Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath.  Also, sometimes
configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this.

No --disable-rpath in configure, but lots of one libtool and two g++ invocations
that reference it.  Unfortunately I'm not sure how to get rid of them; autoconf
is completely opaque and hideous to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.