From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 00:47:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010047.k710lQHI006434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 20:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > It just requires you to file RFE's against the relevant packages preferably > with spec patches and a brief explanation. If its not too intrusive it would > probably be accepted. This i can gladly do, though looking at the patches they might be called 'intrusive'. The meat of those patches is a new lib (for tracking recently used) but there is also a part which rewrites some of the application launching code, which ofcource is anything but trivial .. if it would ever break, there would be no desktop worth mentioning for the end users :-) For the time being i've replaced the recently used with places, but i'll file the bugs with the RFE's, and see how it floats.. if there accepted i'll build it so that it has both recently used and places (seeing how nautilus has this as a prominent thing too, we might as well include it) > Installing yelp didnt make a difference. Glad to hear in comment #27 it did :-) Requires and build requires still need a lot of spit and polish, i'm basing my work on the original spec and it still needs a good scrubbing :-) Yelp and beagle are definatly 2 packages that will make the requires list, however I'm still weighing if i should expand the requires to include openoffice writer/impress/calc, firefox and evolution ... it comes hardcoded with a list of pre-set 'favorite applications' and it would be a shame to have this menu be empty (ie .desktop files not found for those apps).. however it might be a (to) heavy dependency to pull in? > There is some docs in %docs but not sure whether it is documented or even > possible currently. Jeremy Katz katzj at redhat.com, jeremy on fedora-devel irc is > the developer and maintainer of both these packages for contact. I'll have to ping Jeremy for this, no docs make any mention of such functionality, and where there is a system-install-packages, there's no uninstall .. Alternativly for the time being i considered patching out those menu options if we can't provide them with functionality for now > I am just a volunteer from the Fedora perspective so take your time. Just > reviewing the functionality. Sorry if i sounded a bit grumpy before, just been a long day :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 00:55:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010055.k710tu9Z006927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 00:57:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010057.k710vCD6007014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-07-31 20:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > This i can gladly do, though looking at the patches they might be called > 'intrusive'. The meat of those patches is a new lib (for tracking recently used) > but there is also a part which rewrites some of the application launching code, > which ofcource is anything but trivial .. if it would ever break, there would be > no desktop worth mentioning for the end users :-) > > For the time being i've replaced the recently used with places, but i'll file > the bugs with the RFE's, and see how it floats.. if there accepted i'll build it > so that it has both recently used and places (seeing how nautilus has this as a > prominent thing too, we might as well include it) Right. Places seems the best option if you dont manage to get the other patches in which seems unlikely from your comments. I would actually prefer places as a option even if we have a recently used apps feature. > Yelp and beagle are definatly 2 packages that will make the requires list, > however I'm still weighing if i should expand the requires to include openoffice > writer/impress/calc, firefox and evolution ... it comes hardcoded with a list of > pre-set 'favorite applications' and it would be a shame to have this menu be > empty (ie .desktop files not found for those apps).. however it might be a (to) > heavy dependency to pull in? Apparently the favorite applications are treated as bookmarks and assuming the applications in the default desktop group to be present in the system is very reasonable. I would prefer these apps to be not defined as dependencies. Nothing would happen if the user clicks on a non installed application currently which is less of a evil (maybe a quick dialog box that its not installed or offering to install it using pirut might be a option) compared to pulling in the the kitchen sink as dependencies. > > I'll have to ping Jeremy for this, no docs make any mention of such > functionality, and where there is a system-install-packages, there's no > uninstall .. Alternativly for the time being i considered patching out those > menu options if we can't provide them with functionality for now Ok. That makes sense. > > > I am just a volunteer from the Fedora perspective so take your time. Just > > reviewing the functionality. > Sorry if i sounded a bit grumpy before, just been a long day :-) > Thats fine. People assume everyone with a @redhat id has a Fedora job. Just clarifying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 01:08:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010108.k7118KnW007518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-07-31 20:59 EST ------- File the RFE bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863 Not counting on it floating, but you never know right :-) btw, when apps are not installed (aka their .desktop file is missing from /usr/share/applications/), the menu item is just not showed .. a lot more gracefull way of dealing with it then having dead buttons, so i'll leave that the way it is, and try to make the default 'favorite applications' as sane as possible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 01:24:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010124.k711OWsx008141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-07-31 21:15 EST ------- Mike, I've found two more problems: * missing build requirement: tcp_wrappers configure output ---------------- ... checking for socket in -lsocket... no checking for main in -lwrap... yes checking for strdup... yes ... nrpe linking ------------ gcc ... -o nrpe nrpe.c utils.c -L/usr/lib -lssl -lcrypto -lnsl -lwrap * package nagios-plugins-nrpe shouldn't own /usr/lib/nagios /usr/lib/nagios/plugins as they are owned by the nagios-plugins package (which is listed as a requirement) $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/nagios nagios-plugins-1.4.3-14.fc5 $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/nagios/plugins nagios-plugins-1.4.3-14.fc5 jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 01:47:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010147.k711l9Uv009588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-31 21:37 EST ------- I had to add BR: libxml2-devel in order to get this to build. Once that was done, rpmlint just has: W: perl-Gtk2-Sexy devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/Sexy/Install/sexy-autogen.h which is normal for Perl modules. The debuginfo package is missing the source: cpio: Gtk2-Sexy-0.02/Sexy.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gtk2-Sexy-0.02/SexyIconEntry.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gtk2-Sexy-0.02/SexySpellEntry.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gtk2-Sexy-0.02/SexySpellEntry.xs: No such file or directory cpio: Gtk2-Sexy-0.02/SexyTooltip.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gtk2-Sexy-0.02/SexyTreeView.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gtk2-Sexy-0.02/SexyUrlLabel.c: No such file or directory but I'm pretty sure that's just rpm bustedness. You can fix it by adding one line to the end of %build: cp xs/* . I'm not really sure it's necessary, but it does result in a proper debuginfo package and shouldn't harm anything, even with short-circuit builds. (Something like this is needed for many Java packages as well.) It's pretty much pointless to run the test suite within mock, but I did install the built package locally and the examples seemed to run well enough. However, in order to run the examples I had to install perl-Gtk2. Is this package useful at all without perl-Gtk2 installed? I don't see any blockers except for the missing BR:; what do you think about the debuginfo fix and the perl-Gtk2 dependency? Review: * source files match upstream: 59433b6b2f2d72c5dfcc0d1dd0c5e7d7 Gtk2-Sexy-0.02.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). ? debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignorable errors. * final provides and requires are sane: Sexy.so()(64bit) perl(Gtk2::Sexy) = 0.02 perl(Gtk2::Sexy::Install::Files) perl-Gtk2-Sexy = 0.02-2.fc6 = libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libsexy.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present but isn't possibly going to run in mock. * shared libraries are present (internal to Perl) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 01:52:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200848] Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010152.k711qXIq009865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Fast and secure IRC-server written from scratch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200848 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 02:19:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010219.k712J2f7010736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-31 22:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I don't see any blockers except for the missing BR:; what do you think about the > debuginfo fix and the perl-Gtk2 dependency? Works by me -- I'll add the BR, an explicit dep on perl(Gtk2), fix the debug packages and post links here in a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 02:34:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010234.k712YG7l011127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-31 22:24 EST ------- Oddly enough, perl-Gtk2-Sexy-debuginfo was building with xs/*.c files included over here (fc5/x86_64)... Adding that one line to %build didn't change the composition; but hopefully will under fc6/mock. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Sexy-0.02-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 02:36:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010236.k712aieV011265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-07-31 22:27 EST ------- Are you stillintrested in getting this package in Fedora Extras? If so please review the packaging guidelines. and ensure that your package meets them. Please note that you can not use your existing build system with the extras package. It must meet the fedora guidelines and live in fedora extras cvs. you can keep a copy in your local svn tree but your package must meet fedora guidelines always. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 04:52:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 00:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010452.k714qAtn017163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-01 00:42 EST ------- That last URL is actually for the previous version, but I found the new one and it looks good to me. The debuginfo package looks fine now and all of the dependencies are in line. I'm still somewhat confused about the issue of the debuginfo package and don't really understand why FC5 would build things differently than devel; perhaps there's been a regression here but I don't see where it is. I don't think the quick fix harms anything and it does get things building properly on devel so I think it's OK to go it, but it would be nice to get to the bottom of it eventually. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 05:06:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010506.k7156rSS017703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-01 00:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Needs work/Niggle > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/doc/%{name} - why is this going to /usr/doc > instead of %{_docdir}? > This is what upstreams Makefile does, thats why its removed and then later added under files with %doc. > Question > sed -i 's|\r||' README.html COPYING.TXT - is this to remove the incorrect > termination of the files? I tend to use 's/\r//' > Same thing you can use any special char after the s in sed not only / but also | or ! or :, etc. This is handy when your search or replace string contains / for example when search replacing file / dir paths using / after the s is a bad idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 05:23:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010523.k715N7Fv018075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-01 01:13 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED. Please remember to close this review request once imported into CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 05:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010547.k715l48W019319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-01 01:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Sorry for the delay, I've been busy for a while. By the end of this week I > should have uploaded the game. > Good. > I have one question tough: The game has optional support for a library that > isn't on extras or core (libggz) for online gaming, but it still doesn't support > online gaming. Should I include the library now, or should I include it only > when the game supports online gaming? Thats up to you, you cannot however just include the library, the library should be packaged and reviewed seperatly once that has been done you can add the -devel subpackage of the library to the BuildRequires of glob2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 06:13:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010613.k716DcED020704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-01 02:04 EST ------- There is at least one instance where you use 'rm', and then '%{__rm}'. The guidelines require that you use one or the other form consistently. ("MUST") Also, the package fails to build under mock: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libplds4.so, needed by /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libplc4.so, needed by /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libnspr4.so, needed by /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libssl3.so, needed by /usr/lib64/libcamel-1.2.so.0, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libsmime3.so, needed by /usr/lib64/libcamel-1.2.so.0, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libnss3.so, needed by /usr/lib64/libcamel-1.2.so.0, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/lib64/libcamel-1.2.so.0: undefined reference to `NSS_InitReadWrite at NSS_3.2' (Full log attached.) I suspect this is due to nspr & nss not being buildrequires'ed, from the names of the libraries being referenced. Additionally, are the scriptlets necessary? The .desktop file does not have a MimeType entry (see wiki: ScriptletSnippets). In any case, desktop-file-utils should not be required for the scriptlets and the scriptlets should be tolerant of the desktop-file-utils not being installed. After installing, I find I have two entries for the app in my menus. X package meets naming and packaging guidelines (release tag). X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + Package URL is browsable. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + source files match upstream: 951471bf5d6fe93fe550c60b6bdf58f9 gnome-phone-manager-0.7.tar.bz2 951471bf5d6fe93fe550c60b6bdf58f9 gnome-phone-manager-0.7.tar.bz2.srpm + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. X package builds in mock (devel/x86_64). + rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: == provides gnome-phone-manager = 0.7-2.fc5 == requires /bin/sh X desktop-file-utils libICE.so.6()(64bit) libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libbluetooth.so.1()(64bit) libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit) libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit) libbtctl.so.2()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libebook-1.2.so.5()(64bit) libedataserver-1.2.so.7()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnokii.so.2()(64bit) libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-keyring.so.0()(64bit) libgnomebt.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. X %check is not present, but there are no tests X non-sane scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. X desktop file installs correctly. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 06:16:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010616.k716GL6W020833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-01 02:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133370) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133370&action=view) mock x86_64/devel build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 07:19:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608010719.k717J5ZD023687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-01 03:09 EST ------- Updated to 0.5.6. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/abook.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/abook-0.5.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 10:49:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011049.k71AnOEt007271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 06:40 EST ------- Tested on two other x86 machines, failed to build in mock with the same error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 10:51:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011051.k71ApcQo007528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 06:42 EST ------- Thanks. Can you upload a new srpm with the amended spec file so that it can tested again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 11:00:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 07:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011100.k71B0tBt008317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 06:51 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec Updated spec file (the SRPM is the same) Contains fPIC fix, spaces/tabs fix and Source0 fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 11:52:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 07:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011152.k71BqejO011786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-01 07:43 EST ------- New version here (I used your attached spec verbatim): Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/soundtouch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/soundtouch-1.3.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 11:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 07:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011158.k71BwpH8012068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-01 07:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I didn't realize putting '%post' in the changelog would be a problem; I'll > obscure that. Just escape macros in the changelog (e.g. use %%post instead of %post) and you'll get the desired effect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 12:15:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011215.k71CFC7I012787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 08:05 EST ------- Thanks. Good: mock builds cleanly rpmlint shows nothing of importance software works md5sums are the same upstream version same no dupes no ownership problems On the condition that you add pkgconfig to the R: on the devel package, I'm happy for this to go in. This was discussed at the start of July on IRC (FESCo) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 14:09:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011409.k71E9EBA020550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 mbroz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mbroz at redhat.com 2006-08-01 09:59 EST ------- Permissions set to 0755, macro expansion in changelog repaired. Spec file commited to CVS - link above. I cannot get rpmlint error shlib-with-non-pic-code (on local build rpm & brew build), how did you get this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 14:34:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011434.k71EYaN2022458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-01 10:25 EST ------- Work so far today: * Tue Aug 1 2006 Chris Chabot - 0.6.2-1.20060801cvs - Changed version to actual upstream version - Reworked requires/buildrequires - Formatted spec file - Changed package manger patch, made remove/update menu items optional incase these will some day be posible thru pup / pirut - Added patch to DocPath, to support X-Gnome-DocPath in .desktop files too - Changed network click to call system-config-network, and added requires spec file looks a bit cleaner now too, (build/)requires are a bit saner now, mock builds cleanly and rpmlint is happy too.. Also renamed the version to 0.6.2, thats whats reported internally in slab :-) Will have some more time hopefully tonight to knock a few more things of the todolist. updated spec/srpm: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-1.20060801cvs.src.rpm Not finished yet, but getting closer step by step :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 14:59:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200374] Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011459.k71Ex6UP025127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstat - Real-time Game Server Status for Quake servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200374 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-01 10:49 EST ------- Injected into CVS. Thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 16:08:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200918] New: Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200918 Summary: Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgadmin3/pgadmin3-admin81.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgadmin3/pgadmin3-admin81-1.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: pgAdmin3 adminpacks enable server instrumentation on PostgreSQL 8.1.X servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 16:09:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200918] Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011609.k71G9OFA031382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200918 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 16:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011611.k71GBgPc031609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-01 12:02 EST ------- SPEC: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d-0.5.15.0-2.src.rpm - I cleaned up the %files section a bit, as you requested. The package does indeed have both libraries in /usr/lib and /usr/lib/k3d (those are plugins). - For the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. I believe this is intentional. See here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00569.html Essentially you are getting the warnings because the package dependencies are not installed. As for the weak linking, I believe it is intentional to allow k3d libs to link to either libGL.so from Xorg or from Nv***a. - For the devel vs non-devel. Part of the package can be considered a devel package, but I dont think it does what a traditional devel package would do. The reasons has to do with what K-3D does: it's merely a modeler, the first step before calling the main rendering engine (e.g. aqsis, which I'll try to package next), and that step involves using the devel-type files. So the devel files are required by the main package. This is explicitely mentioned in the project page at http://www.k-3d.org/wiki/GettingStarted , as well as in comment #1 above. I brought up the issue on a fedora mailing list a while ago, but I can't seem to track it down in the archives. I remember the consensus was that it made little sense to split a package if both parts require each other. OTOH I can't say I have a strong opinion on the matter... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 16:15:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011615.k71GFkGj031919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-08-01 12:06 EST ------- Package was built fine in devel :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 16:34:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011634.k71GYmht001041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-01 12:25 EST ------- OK, I've managed to persuade, with the aid of a patch, the configure script to generate the correct soname. Can you give this one a try on rawhide x86_64? SPEC: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libpng10.spec SRPM: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libpng10-1.0.20-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 16:58:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011658.k71GwTNq003252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-01 12:49 EST ------- Yes, you're totally right and I'm very sorry about the delay. It won't happen again. I've just jumped through the hoops of getting an account and pushed my first approved package (sysconftool). I promise to be more responsive from now on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 17:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011753.k71HrxUM007044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-01 13:44 EST ------- The following changes were made to the spec file and srpm in: http://people.redhat.com/steved/fscache/cachefilesd/0.3-2 diff -r1.8 cachefilesd.spec 3c3 < Release: 2%{?dist} --- > Release: 3%{?dist} 8c8 < Source0: cachefilesd-0.3.tar.bz2 --- > Source0: http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/cachefilesd/cachefilesd-0.3.tar.bz2 71c71 < %config %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/cachefilesd --- > %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/cachefilesd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 18:05:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] New: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: nando at ccrma.stanford.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/freqtweak.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/freqtweak-0.6.1-4.src.rpm Description: FreqTweak is a tool for FFT-based realtime audio spectral manipulation and display. It provides several algorithms for processing audio data in the frequency domain and a highly interactive GUI to manipulate the associated filters for each. It also provides high-resolution spectral displays in the form of scrolling-raster spectragrams and energy vs frequency plots displaying both pre- and post-processed spectra. This is also a very good Jack demo application with realtime processing of inputs, just plug in a microphone, start Jack, start Freqtweak, connect all ports (for example using Qjackctl) and start having fun. -- Fernando -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 18:13:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011813.k71IDrLc009220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-08-01 14:04 EST ------- Well, I still can't see why I should depend on gnutls when openssl is available per default. As from my understanding a bitlbee binary linking to openssl is not more or less probably illegal rather a wget binary linking to openssl (there are many examples more, just try a rpm -e --test openssl). Also said, bitlbee and wget are both licensed under GNU GPL and I absolutely can't see any difference between them. Or did Red Hat do some probably illegal things for Fedora Core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 18:28:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] New: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: nando at ccrma.stanford.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper-1.0.8-0.1.c.src.rpm Description: SooperLooper is a realtime software looping sampler in the spirit of Gibson's Echoplex Digital Pro. If used with a low-latency kernel and the proper audio buffer configuration it is capable of truly realtime live looping performance. Another very nice realtime audio processor from Planet CCRMA (needs Jack). -- Fernando -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 18:35:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199834] Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011835.k71IZZHl012488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199834 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-01 14:26 EST ------- OK, I have done a mock build which works fine. So I can APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 18:40:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011840.k71IesDJ013079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 18:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608011847.k71Il4pq013699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-01 14:37 EST ------- rpmlint dows complaints the following on the binary rpm: rpmlint pyicq-t-0.7-2.noarch.rpm E: pyicq-t obsolete-not-provided pyicqt W: pyicq-t incoherent-init-script-name pyicqt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 20:00:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196146] Review Request: mod_nss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012000.k71K0Jbv022982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_nss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196146 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |200958 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 20:11:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012011.k71KBhOm023975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-01 16:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, I still can't see why I should depend on gnutls when openssl is available > per default. As from my understanding a bitlbee binary linking to openssl is not > more or less probably illegal rather a wget binary linking to openssl (there are > many examples more, just try a rpm -e --test openssl). Also said, bitlbee and > wget are both licensed under GNU GPL and I absolutely can't see any difference > between them. Or did Red Hat do some probably illegal things for Fedora Core? GPL software linking against OpenSSL should include an exception in the license to allow this. For instance, the wget README file, it says: In addition, as a special exception, the Free Software Foundation gives permission to link the code of its release of Wget with the OpenSSL project's "OpenSSL" library (or with modified versions of it that use the same license as the "OpenSSL" library), and distribute the linked executables. You must obey the GNU General Public License in all respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL". If you modify this file, you may extend this exception to your version of the file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 20:23:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012023.k71KN05W024923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-01 16:13 EST ------- I get the shlib warning when building for x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 20:31:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012031.k71KVNIb025483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-01 16:22 EST ------- Yes, indeed. However, should OpenSSL be the default if there are alternatives that can be used and when the developers themselves recommend gnutls. Why go the path of legal grey area when there is a prefectly acceptable alternative? The configure scripts don't even detect for OpenSSL! It just assumes you are using OpenSSL if you do not specify gnutls or nss. You still haven't provided a techincal reason to use OpenSSL. "Becuase they did too" isn't really a reason. There is no need for this to depend on OpenSSL, its only blocking FE-LEGAL and holding up the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 20:32:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012032.k71KWMUp025589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-01 16:22 EST ------- rpmlint is warning you that there is no standalone URL tag which might point to a project page. Your spec /srpm wasn't updated at your sight, but I'm applying the patches to it by hand. Hrm, somehow I missed this before: there is no actual cleaning of rpmbuildroot in %clean, please fix that. E: cachefilesd zero-length /usr/share/doc/cachefilesd-0.3/ChangeLog And would it kill ya to add URL: http://www.redhat.com or something similar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 20:44:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012044.k71KiL0O026367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-01 16:35 EST ------- err... http://people.redhat.com/steved/fscache/cachefilesd/0.3-3 has the correct spec and srpm... adding a http://www.redhat.com URL would be fine... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 20:51:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012051.k71KpY7M026940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-01 16:42 EST ------- Ps thanks to the Docpath + X-Gnome-DocPath patch i made to support normal gnome (vs suse custom) help file paths, it seems to work to work well again (though you need to remove & re-add the applet to make it take affect) However not everything has a document file associated with it, so the results arn't as overwelming as they could have been .. on my rawhide system (with quite a bit installed) i get: # grep "DocPath" *.desktop evince.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath= gnome-cd.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-cd/gnome-cd.xml gnome-dictionary.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-dictionary/gnome-dictionary.xml gnome-eog.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=eog/eog.xml gnome-file-roller.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=file-roller/file-roller.xml gnome-gcalctool.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gcalctool/gcalctool.xml gnome-gedit.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gedit/gedit.xml gnome-search-tool.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-search-tool/gnome-search-tool.xml gnome-system-log.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-system-log/gnome-system-log.xml gnome-terminal.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-terminal/index.html gnome-volume-control.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gst-mixer/gnome-volume-control.xml gthumb.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gthumb/gthumb.xml rhythmbox.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=rhythmbox/rhythmbox.xml Still, its a start :-) Todo is still: - Replacing computer icon on panel with fedora one - make system-config-network .desktop file & include it, main package doesnt have it (and is needed to make it called from main menu) - Add few more fedora standard places to places menu - Consider to keep 'autostart' menu's or patch them out.. - Hopefully enable recently-used, but depends on patches being included in panel/desktop - Still waiting reply from Jeremy on pirut/pup functionality, made package commands optional (instead of flat out removing them), if gconf key of those commands is empty, their not shown in the context menu ps if you don't see 'Search' in the main menu (as you reported Sundaram) then start 'beagled' and it will show up :-) Slab is actually quite smart about showing/hiding functionality based on whats available, i'm impressed by that :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:20:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012120.k71LKGp3029537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 17:11 EST ------- The devel package are files required to build or develop the package. These are headers, .so files and compiling documentation. This package requires a -devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:43:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012143.k71Lhp7l031509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 ------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com 2006-08-01 17:34 EST ------- pyspi just built successfully into FC-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:44:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012144.k71LiHZl031549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-01 17:34 EST ------- Still doesn't have the changes I mentioned above... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012144.k71Lix9S031580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-01 17:35 EST ------- Looks good Paul. Menu entry shows up now too. APPROVED. Please remember to close this review request once imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:45:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012145.k71LjhQu031699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-01 17:36 EST ------- static linking is highly frowned upon http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for more info developer laziness is generally not considered a good enough reason. Looking at the sepc all those macros make the spec file confusing. Dont redefine name version and release. you need full urls to the upstream source tarball. I really sugegst reading the packaging guidelines and doing some work on them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:50:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012150.k71Lonbq032160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 17:41 EST ------- Some comments Release: 2 Needs %{?dist} on the end Requires: webserver Never heard of it! should this be httpd? %attr(644,root,root) %{_phppgadmindir}/lang/Makefile A makefile? Sure about that? %attr(755,root,root) %{_phppgadmindir}/lang/convert.awk I suspect you'll need R: awk Just comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:52:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012152.k71LqVaw032253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com 2006-08-01 17:43 EST ------- dogtail just built successfully into FC-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 21:59:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012159.k71LxqnO032524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-01 17:50 EST ------- OK, I can sponsor you.( just been made a sponsor) However, this is a fairly small and simple package. Do you plan to submit more packages to FE ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:02:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012202.k71M27BT032715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-01 17:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Requires: webserver > > Never heard of it! should this be httpd? httpd (and others) provide webserver. (e.g. yum whatprovides webserver) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:12:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012212.k71MC6s9000721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 18:02 EST ------- Thanks for that and such an easy review process! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:36:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012236.k71Ma6UJ001979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-01 18:26 EST ------- Build on x86-64 now. Nice work fixing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:36:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012236.k71MaWB7002027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 18:27 EST ------- #5, true. However, given the spec file later specifies httpd, would this not be better off as requiring httpd so that no other webserver providing application is accepted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:40:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] New: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis-0.5.8-1.src.rpm Description: Cyphesis is a WorldForge server suitable running small games. It is also designed by be used as an AI subsystem in a network of distributed servers. It includes a terrain engine based on the Mercator library, a persistence system based on PostgreSQL, and an AI engine using goal trees implemented in Python. It is the server used in most current WorldForge games. This package includes a SELinux policy module following the draft policy guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux/PolicyModules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:48:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012248.k71MmOUR002584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-01 18:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Bad > --- > > It really does need to be enclosed in a wrapper with an example script for use > in %{_sysconfdir} - as it stands, it's one of those applications that you > install and wonder why you did - at least with something in %{_sysconfdir} users > will know what to do (or where to look!) > > Fix the issue in BAD and I'm happy to approve it. Is hdparm a service? They both perform the same sort of function -- run once at boot to tweak various interface settings of a physical device. If someone has installed this package, then either they know what they're doing (and can find README.fedora), or they don't and this package shouldn't try to do anything with their system. If they do, they're still going to have to configure it based on the particulars of their hardware, so the amount of user-work is the same either way. The package-supplied README is quite detailed in the particulars of the proper use of the program. A full-blown sysv-style service wrapper around would turn this very simple package into a much more complex beast, with addtional scripts, documentation, additional bits in the spec, etc, than it warrants. It introduces additional complexity at a net of questionable benefit -- especially when we consider that this package, while useful to those who need its functionality _now_, is predestined to have a very limited lifespan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:56:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012256.k71MuflL002862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-01 18:47 EST ------- Updated package that fixes a borked -init patch: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis-0.5.8-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 22:57:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012257.k71Mvct5002919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:00:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012300.k71N0OwT003047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 18:51 EST ------- Before I start the review, can I ask... %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets/*/*.py %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets/*/*.pyc %ghost %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets/*/*.pyo There are lots of these. Would it not be better for the package to just own those %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets - this would negate the need for the multiple datadirs Unless I've misunderstood things that is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:03:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012303.k71N319q003176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-01 18:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Before I start the review, can I ask... > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets/*/*.py > %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets/*/*.pyc > %ghost %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets/*/*.pyo > > There are lots of these. Would it not be better for the package to just own > those %{_datadir}/%{name}/rulesets - this would negate the need for the multiple > datadirs > > Unless I've misunderstood things that is. Yes, that would make things simpler. But you might have missed that the *.pyo files are marked as %ghost. AFAIK, when you have nested directories with python files like this, you have to list each one individually in order to properly %ghost the .pyo files. But if you know of a shorthand to accomplish the same thing, I'd love to hear it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:04:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012304.k71N4c6P003263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529 work.eric at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From work.eric at gmail.com 2006-08-01 18:55 EST ------- Sorry I don't have FC5 on my machine right now. When I get the time later this week I'll get a build system up and running in VMWare. I will then add the ldconfig lines to my devel package as requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:10:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012310.k71NAEWp003613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 19:00 EST ------- Can you not just claim the directorys and then add a series of %ghost files? It would certainly make things easier on the eye... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:15:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012315.k71NF4qX003788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-01 19:05 EST ------- Okay. The considered opinion of others is that as it stands, it would be simple enough to create a script, but it isn't needed. On that basis... APPROVED Don't forget to close this bug and set the resolve bug to NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:26:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012326.k71NQInv004129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-01 19:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Can you not just claim the directorys and then add a series of %ghost files? It > would certainly make things easier on the eye... You learn something new every day. :) Yes, that does seem to work without producing any rpmlint warnings. Here's an updated package with a cleaned up %files section: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis-0.5.8-3.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012329.k71NTFpx004256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-01 19:19 EST ------- Another problem: it crashes the whole GNOME (i.e panel and terminal) on my FC5 AMD64 box when you enter the following URL (so don't click it blindly!): B I G F A T W A R N I N G THIS WILL KILL YOUR GNOME SESSION DON'T SAY YOU WEREN'T WARNED! http://www.cafepress.com/cp/search/search.aspx?cfpt=118%3A________________H&q=B5&x=0&y=0&cfpt2=&copt=&source=searchBox -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:33:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012333.k71NXG4l004467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-01 19:23 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #5) > Release: 2 > > Needs %{?dist} on the end Thanks! Fixed. > Requires: webserver > > Never heard of it! should this be httpd? Skipping this per comments above. > %attr(644,root,root) %{_phppgadmindir}/lang/Makefile > > A makefile? Sure about that? Yeah. It is the Makefile for language utility that ships with phpPgAdmin. (thought a bit more before submitting this comment...) It **may** be enough to ship lang/recoded/ dir; however I'm inclined to ship source lang files and make people correct and compile their languages easily. Let's leave that like this. > %attr(755,root,root) %{_phppgadmindir}/lang/convert.awk > > I suspect you'll need R: awk Thanks, added. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 1 23:56:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608012356.k71NuHMh005960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-08-01 19:47 EST ------- Actually my first submission was ssmtp. Please be as kind as to check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 I have adopted ren because the original submitter preferred to abandon rather then make a few [simple] modifications and it was a pity to loose his work. And since we use it anyway at my workplace... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 00:17:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020017.k720H5Qb006682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 bruno.cornec at hp.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-08-01 20:07 EST ------- I'm still interested, and have read most of what was advised. I want to propose a new version with the upstream 2.0.9 version which should arrive RSN. I'll amend this bug report as soon as it's available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 00:19:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020019.k720JbAv006768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-01 20:10 EST ------- Ok, I will review this one also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 01:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020100.k7210n7J007984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-01 20:51 EST ------- Truncated 'l' on bytefx-data-mysq for some reason. Also, need to Requires mono-nunit. Not building on rawhide at the moment due to "Missing Dependency: mozilla is needed by package gecko-sharp2", but builds on FC5 x86_64, and runs "hello world" sucessfully. update-mime-database is noisy. The test redirects to /dev/null but the actual call does not. This will confuse users and tools. Recommend something like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets which are one line, and silent. Also from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets, add the update-desktop=database entry. No SMP flags or note as to why they would not be a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 02:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020203.k7223WR3010587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-01 21:54 EST ------- Maded the following changed to the spec that can be found in http://people.redhat.com/steved/fscache/cachefilesd/0.3-3 diff -r1.9 cachefilesd.spec 6a7,8 > URL: http://www.redhat.com > 56a59 > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 03:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020359.k723xvFP014093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-01 23:50 EST ------- > Unhappy with the *.so things in the %files and %files devel > The -devel package includes a .pc file, which is useless without pkgconfig, ergo > the -devel package should Require: pkgconfig Fixed in the first build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:00:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020400.k7240Jj3014132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:04:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020404.k7244Hjt014247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-01 23:54 EST ------- You missed libtheora-devel to be included in BR. Otherwise package looks ok(SPEC is correct and rpmlint is silent for nondevel RPM) after i add libtheora-devel to BR. Mockbuild then gave me many warnings which are itelsf explanatory about how to remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:13:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020413.k724D29H014752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-02 00:03 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/papyrus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.2.2-1.src.rpm New spec: new release (adds checks for boost smart pointers if tr1 isn't found) and adds pkgconfig to requires of devel package. Also, cairomm is rebuilt against cairo, and pending release. Hopefully that will take care of the linkage issue. If it doesn't, I'll talk with the cairomm devs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:18:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200492] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020418.k724IBLr014994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200492 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-02 00:09 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020426.k724Qbki015194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-02 00:17 EST ------- Sorry for my delay now. I was out of town. I will try and do a full review in the next few days... Perhaps it's worth reporting the 64bit crash upstream? I see that the 0.7.4 release claims to have a bunch of x86_64 build fixes, but it doesn't say that it fully works there yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:27:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020427.k724RPBL015225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-02 00:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clipsmm-0.0.5-1.src.rpm This one's a lot cleaner, mainly because the srpm wasn't the one I intended (it wasn't built from the spec I posted, which had the right BR). The issue with the autoconf-generated config.h is also fixed in both clips and clipsmm, and neither one has #defines that will step on each other or any other autoconf package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:27:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020427.k724Rafe015241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-02 00:18 EST ------- I get the following on FC5 during the build process: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2-2.4.so: undefined reference to `pango_x_get_context' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [freqtweak] Error 1 I think this is due to bugzilla # 188941. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:38:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020438.k724cVJg015595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 00:29 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is successfull with some warnings for source code * MUST Items: - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package lostirc, in the format lostirc.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package is legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. X This package dont have any License file. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (501cd56bc0740d599540fb415718b939 lostirc-0.4.6.tar.gz) - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package owns all directories that it creates. - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - This package used macros. - Document files are included. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. X Desktop files installed twice. You can solve this problem by passing option --delete-original to desktop-install-file Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * I did not test package functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:47:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020447.k724lqCp015871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-02 00:38 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:51:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020451.k724pe5g016008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 00:42 EST ------- Mock build was successfull for rawhide i386 rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 04:55:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020455.k724tmGK016167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-02 00:46 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/conexus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/conexus-0.2.2-1.src.rpm - Added pkgconfig to Requires - New release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020505.k7255HcN016533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-02 00:56 EST ------- Jarod -- As I start going through the review, any reason to not build this with ssl support? It would seem that enabling it is as easy as appending --enable-ssl to %configure, and add openssl-devel as a br. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:05:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020505.k7255k3Z016571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:16:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020516.k725GVUU016940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-02 01:07 EST ------- Hi Fernando -- I tried building this on FC5 and got... Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src' cd .. && /bin/sh /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/missing --run automake-1.9 --foreign src/Makefile configure.ac:27: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.9.6, configure.ac:27: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE configure.ac:27: comes from Automake 1.9.4. You should recreate configure.ac:27: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96186 (%build) Do you not see this? AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:24:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020524.k725Ogpb017172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-02 01:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/gnustep-make/gnustep-make.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/gnustep-make/gnustep-make-1.12.0-5.at.src.rpm Teach gnustep-make some FHS. Also removes the /usr/local/.../GNUstep special handling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:40:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020540.k725ehux017761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 01:31 EST ------- As Chris Chabot has worked a lot on this package, i would like to give up maintainership of this package to him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:50:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] New: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/libFoundation/libFoundation.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/libFoundation/libFoundation-1.1.3-8.at.src.rpm Description: libFoundation is a free and almost complete implementation of Foundation Kit as defined by the OpenStep specifications, plus more classes that come with the newest releases of OPENSTEP 4.x and Rhapsody. Expected rpmlint output: W: libFoundation invalid-license libFoundation license W: libFoundation-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:51:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020551.k725pPs3018291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201000 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:51:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020551.k725pE6Q018271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197649 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 05:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020557.k725vXjv018466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 01:48 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is successfull with errors. Maybe you try adding autoconf in BR * MUST Items: - dist tag is present. - rpmlint is silent - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package sooperlooper, in the format sooperlooper.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package is legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. X This package dont have any License file. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (9b34c7cb8fc6daa4c7a9c17004680dac sooperlooper-1.0.8c.tar.gz) - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not contain any ExcludeArch. - This package owns all directories that it creates. - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - This package have a %clean section, which contains %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}. - This package used macros. - Document files are included. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. - Desktop file installed correclty. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * I did not test package functionality However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 06:23:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 02:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020623.k726N7BL019086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 02:13 EST ------- I think you should add NEWS,AUTHORS,Changelog files to your source code thru' adding patch. then changes in %build %build # remove compiler option unrecognized by gcc4x find . -type f -exec %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|-fmove-all-movables||g" {} \; aclocal autoheader automake autoconf %configure %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 06:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 02:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020640.k726eRI1019708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-02 02:31 EST ------- Haven't tested, but doesn't that result in "file included twice" warnings from rpmbuild? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 07:42:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 03:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020742.k727gajI022851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-02 03:33 EST ------- Well, I'm in no position to complain about delays, so no worries. ;) Thanks for taking the time. I'll try reporting the crash this week. Actually, it's crm114 that triggers the crash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 07:59:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 03:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020759.k727xLLj024067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-02 03:50 EST ------- 1/?I know that static libraries should be avoided, when possible (see my not in comment #1). In that case, the upstream developpers do not provide shared library for libCGALQt.a and libcore++.a. For libcore++, I could package Core separately (http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core/download/core_v1.7/). But, for libCGALQt.a, do you see a solution? Waiting for the next release which could have shared version for all libraries cannot be a solution: CGAL releases come each year. It was really a chance that I manage to make the documention files removed from the upstream tarball of CGAL-3.2.1 (for license issues). 2/?As regards the macros... yes I know. This spec file is configurable, so that it can be applied to internal release of CGAL as well. What do you mean by redefining name of version or release? If I am not wrong, the conditionals make them be defined only once. If reviewers agreed that it is two much, I will pruned the spec file to remove the macro, as if the default values were hard-coded. 3/?For the upstream source tarball, I do not understand your point. spectool (from package fedora-rpmdevtools) can understand the macros and give the full URLs. I know pretty well the packaging guidelines. Please give me pointers to paragraphs that I could have missed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 08:33:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 04:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] New: Review Request: HelixPlayer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/HelixPlayer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/HelixPlayer-1.0.7-1.src.rpm Description: Helix Player is an open-source media player built in the Helix Community for consumers. Built using GTK, it plays open source formats, like Ogg Vorbis and Theora using the powerful Helix DNA Client Media Engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 08:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 04:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020839.k728dhA4029058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 04:30 EST ------- Finally HelixPlayer arrived in Extras now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 08:48:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 04:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020848.k728mQM1029691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-02 04:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Another problem: it crashes the whole GNOME (i.e panel and terminal) on my FC5 > AMD64 box when you enter the following URL (so don't click it blindly!): That doesn't look like a gnash bug, but a GNOME (or maybe Xorg/Mesa) bug triggered by gnash. gnash embedded in firefox shouldn't be able to crash anything else than firefox. I also had many bugs revealed by gnash on FC5. Things are smoother on devel (but with other issues, like Xorg not starting with latest update of the driver, it's rawhide after all ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 08:53:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 04:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020853.k728r12Q030038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-02 04:43 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/monodevelop.spec SRPM is the same (other than the spec file needing to be the one here!) fixes #58 In addition, I've removed which from the main R and added pkgconfig to the -devel package I can't fix the gecko-sharp2 problem though ;-p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 08:56:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 04:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020856.k728uSk4030274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 04:47 EST ------- Mock build for rawhide i386 is failed. aclocal:configure.in:44: warning: macro `AM_PATH_ALSA' not found in library configure.in:44: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_ALSA If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 09:08:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 05:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020908.k7298hvd031200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 04:59 EST ------- Package is missing 3 more BRs Add libtool,automake,alsa-lib-devel to BuildRequires and update package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 09:15:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 05:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020915.k729FT93031777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 05:06 EST ------- As per given in kernel module packaging guidelines MUST items present are MUST: This package have the belonging kernel-module with something like 'Requires: %{name}- kmod = %{version}' MUST: This package have its name as %{name}-kmod-common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 09:16:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 05:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200498] Review Request: btsco-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020916.k729GdNU031914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btsco-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 05:07 EST ------- Follow guidelines given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules For submitting Kernel Module package , you need to include/give here * A publishable explanation from the author(s) why the module is not merged with the mainline kernel yet and when it's planed to get merged. You of course can ask the author to explain it directly in the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 09:19:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 05:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608020919.k729JOVI032077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 mbroz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mbroz at redhat.com 2006-08-02 05:09 EST ------- rpmlint lvm2-cluster-2.02.06-1.4.src.rpm W: lvm2-cluster rpm-buildroot-usage %build make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT rpmlint lvm2-cluster-2.02.06-1.4.x86_64.rpm W: lvm2-cluster devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/liblvm2clusterlock.so W: lvm2-cluster no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd W: lvm2-cluster incoherent-init-script-name clvmd package built in brew (same with local x86_64 build in rawhide), http://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/brew/getfile?taskID=141216&name=lvm2-cluster-2.02.06-1.4.x86_64.rpm rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.77-1.fc6 Where is the problem ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 10:01:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200422] Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021001.k72A1Y53002089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200422 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 05:52 EST ------- I did some changes to this package's SPEC file. But as Author has not given URL from where a source tarball can be downloaded and not included License copy in %doc, rpmlint is not silent with warnings W: international-time no-url-tag W: international-time no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 10:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200422] Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021010.k72AA7n7002531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: international-time (first package, seeking sponsor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200422 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 06:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133473) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133473&action=view) Clean SPEC file I have fixed buildroot, BR, %prep section, added dist tag, fixed desktop file installation, added %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 10:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021031.k72AVogB004000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-02 06:22 EST ------- 5.0 is out now -- we should really try to get this into Core IMHO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 10:50:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021050.k72AoWEa005326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 redhat at nslm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at nslm.org ------- Additional Comments From redhat at nslm.org 2006-08-02 06:41 EST ------- Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/mpich2-1.0.3-3-root-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libTraceInput.la /usr/lib/libTraceInput.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 10:52:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021052.k72Aq0n8005430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at nslm.org 2006-08-02 06:42 EST ------- That was when I did an rpmbuild --rebuild mpich2-1.0.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 10:54:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021054.k72AsqiB005627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-02 06:45 EST ------- #18 The .la file shouldn't be there (needs to be deleted in the %install stage) and IIRC, the .so should be in a -devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 11:05:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021105.k72B5f0a006378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at nslm.org 2006-08-02 06:56 EST ------- I was wondering more if they were actually supposed to be in /usr/lib/mpich2 with the rest of the libs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 11:14:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021114.k72BEF2u006956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-02 07:05 EST ------- Unless there is a *damned good reason*, there should be no .la and no .a files packaged. Normally, the .so is a devel file with .so.0.0.x being the runtime lib (or something like that). In answer to #21, the .so file would be installed to %{_libdir}/mpich2, but only if you install the -devel file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 11:41:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021141.k72Bf7x1008444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 07:31 EST ------- Updated to New Release SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.5.fc5.src.rpm I need review of this updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 12:11:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021211.k72CBGhv010064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 08:02 EST ------- This package contains a lot of rpmlint errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 12:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021215.k72CFW7n010256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-08-02 08:06 EST ------- I'm a bit disapointed to see this package has gone in, when apparently many people were opposed to it in bug #186391. I also agree with Paul about the package lacking user-friendliness, which is why I have included an init script and a /etc/sysconfig/ file in my 855resolution package. Please consider merging stuff from my 855resolution package into this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 12:15:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021215.k72CFwLj010329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 08:06 EST ------- Denis, can you add Makefile to source package and make it clean? There are a lot of files in source package but no proper way to handle them thru' Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 12:34:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021234.k72CYYoP011089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-08-02 08:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files > /var/tmp/mpich2-1.0.3-3-root-root > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib/libTraceInput.la > /usr/lib/libTraceInput.so This means I've been missing a BuildRequires, can you please capture and attach (or send me) your configure log. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 12:44:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021244.k72Ci21g011450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-02 08:34 EST ------- Um, possibly. What it's more likely meaning is that a the .la and .so files are not present in the %files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:03:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021303.k72D3XoX012280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-08-02 08:54 EST ------- I upload src.rpm into FC-5, as follow reported: [root at minix common]# ./cvs-import.sh -b FC-5 /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/ss5-3.5.9- 1.src.rpm Checking out the modules file... For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Module 'ss5' already exists... Checking out module: 'ss5' For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Unpacking source package: ss5-3.5.9-1.src.rpm... For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs cvs commit... For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Commit Complete For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs ERROR: The tag ss5-3_5_9-1 is already applied on a different branch ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches ss5-3_5_9-1:devel:mricchet:1150827849 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! But, when I do "cvs co ss5" as suggested into previous Comment: "...Next you have to import into it the required branch. (on my machine I do this) cd extras/common ./cvs-import.sh -b FC-5 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/foo.src.rpm once imported cd .. cvs co foo cd foo/FC-5 make tag make build job done..." CVS answer to me that ss5 doesn't exist ?! What can I do now to build my package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:12:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021312.k72DCf9k012828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-02 09:03 EST ------- SPEC: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d-0.5.15.0-3.src.rpm Okay then, I resplit the package, and added 'Requires: k3d-devel'. There are still some header files in the main package, under /usr/share/, but those are false positives (see comment #1). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:13:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021313.k72DD0iO012867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-08-02 09:03 EST ------- I think I know where libTraceInput is coming from now; they are truly not present in the %files section as they don't get built. The trace_sample in mpich2 is left out because the default Java setup in Fedora can't handle it (I've forgotten exact details now), Mark Chappell probably has Sun's java installed on his system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:16:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021316.k72DGJ5F013019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-02 09:07 EST ------- 13589 (libpng10): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/13589-libpng10-1.0.20-3.fc6/ Thanks for the review and the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:16:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021316.k72DGR0p013053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 Bug 198245 depends on bug 198247, which changed state. Bug 198247 Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200664] Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021320.k72DKSL0013262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soundtouch - Audio Processing library for changing Tempo, Pitch and Playback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200664 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-02 09:11 EST ------- Thanks! I've added the Requires: pkgconfig and imported soundtouch. After some strugling building it due to ppc issues its now build too, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191538] Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021323.k72DNkAU013392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191538 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-02 09:14 EST ------- Oops, I forgot to set this to FE-ACCEPT, doing so now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:26:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021326.k72DQlZc013591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at nslm.org 2006-08-02 09:17 EST ------- Yes I do have Suns Java installed, however I'm a little surprised that that's caused extra files to turn up in the MPICH /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib/mpich2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:27:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021327.k72DRhZR013651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-02 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > You missed libtheora-devel to be included in BR. I just checked this and you're right, strange. > Mockbuild then gave me many warnings which are itelsf explanatory about how to > remove them. Could you post those warnings here? I don't use mock myself because of bandwidth limitations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 13:40:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021340.k72Devt3014355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-08-02 09:31 EST ------- mpich2-1.0.3 build setup is broken in a couple of place which might explain that, had to patch it myself to build properly on Fedora. However ver. 1.0.4 seems to be much better, I'm uploading it now you can give it a try. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.4-1.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 14:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021404.k72E4VQJ015760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 09:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133478) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133478&action=view) Somehow clean SPEC version of original SPEC Still there are a lot of rpmlint errors. In case you are there you can try to clean it or i will post silent rpmlint version of SPEC later on -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 14:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021409.k72E9CRO016064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at nslm.org 2006-08-02 09:59 EST ------- I seem to have gained an unpacked log file too this time... Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/mpich2-1.0.4-1-root-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libTraceInput.la /usr/lib/libTraceInput.so /usr/share/logfiles/barrier.rlog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 14:10:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021410.k72EANqj016157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-02 10:01 EST ------- Huh, not sure why I didn't have ssl turned on... Oh yeah, from the dircproxy wiki (http://dircproxy.securiweb.net/): New feature in 1.2.0 (currently beta) [..] * SSL Support (client mode and server mode, --enable-ssl ) (merge not finished yet) However, now that I look at it more, the README.ssl file (added to the svn trunk post-beta tarball) seems to indicate it actually works reasonably well (just a few caveats), so I'll turn it on and include the README.ssl file... Okay, just pushed a new spec and srpm out. And thank you for picking up the review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 14:16:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021416.k72EGeWm016517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-02 10:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Haven't tested, but doesn't that result in "file included twice" warnings from > rpmbuild? I thought it might, but it didn't when I ran it through mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 15:42:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199833] Review Request: vips - image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021542.k72FglVO023956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vips - image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 15:45:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021545.k72FjWms024192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-02 11:36 EST ------- rpm-4.4.2-15.2 [From test.spec] %files %{python_sitelib} %ghost %{python_sitelib}/foo2 [From rpmbuild -ba test.spec output] Processing files: test-1.0-1 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/foo2 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 [What' actually in the file?] $ fedora-extract test-1.0-1.x86_64.rpm test-1.0-1/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages $ So FC5's rpm is issuing a warning when it builds the package but it is creating the package with the file %ghost'ed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 15:49:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021549.k72FnHkn024527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-02 11:40 EST ------- Ok, with that this package is approved. Will this need to be on comps somewhere, or would you be marking this as a dep of some other package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 15:56:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021556.k72Fujsm024993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEEDINFO_REPORTER OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-02 11:47 EST ------- hrm, it may be the host in which I'm calling rpmlint from... Yep it was. All looks good now. Where does htis need to be in comps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 16:05:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] New: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andy at smile.org.ua QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/IServerd.spec SRPM URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/IServerd-2.4.14-1.src.rpm Description: IServerd is a Groupware ICQ server clone. This program and the author are in no way affiliated with Mirabilis (AOL). This program is designed as unix Groupware ICQ server since there is no Groupware ICQ server on a unix box. No reverse engineering or decompilation of any Mirabilis code took place to make this program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 16:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021608.k72G8MRp025768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-02 11:58 EST ------- The netcdf support is built only if cmake is recent enough, so for reproducible builds it may be relevant to BuildRequires an higher cmake version (at least 2.0.0?) The srpm doesn't rebuild on my devel FC, I guess because %{python_libdir} isn't expanded. Moreover the .pyo are included. You could use the snippet at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#head-01f2df6d8ffc1100844fce3a24b2449fa3bbe679 to get rid of them. And instead of %{python_libdir} why don't use use %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} as in the spectemplate-python.spec? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 17:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021704.k72H4I3a029802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-02 12:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I get the following on FC5 during the build process: > /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2-2.4.so: undefined reference to `pango_x_get_context' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [freqtweak] Error 1 > > I think this is due to bugzilla # 188941. Strange, this should be taken care of by this part of the spec file: %if "%{fc5}" == "1" export LDFLAGS=`pkg-config --libs pangox ` %endif At least I'm able to compile it fine in my build system (mach based). I thought that the extras build system was actually setting fcx during the build... perhaps it is not doing that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 17:32:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198928] Review Request: lsscsi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021732.k72HWGtA000361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsscsi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198928 coldwell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |194453 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 17:34:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021734.k72HYrdF000846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-02 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I tried building this on FC5 and got... > > Making all in src > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src' > cd .. && /bin/sh /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/missing --run > automake-1.9 --foreign src/Makefile > configure.ac:27: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.9.6, > configure.ac:27: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > configure.ac:27: comes from Automake 1.9.4. You should recreate > configure.ac:27: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. > make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96186 (%build) > > Do you not see this? Not on my build system, but see below... (In reply to comment #2) > However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called > nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script? Yes, I see that in my logs, I don't know what is triggering this. In my case the build finishes successfully even with the warnings and repeated configure calls. And the software works. Weird. (In reply to comment #3) > I think you should add NEWS,AUTHORS,Changelog files to your source code thru' > adding patch. then changes in %build > %build > # remove compiler option unrecognized by gcc4x > find . -type f -exec %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|-fmove-all-movables||g" {} \; > aclocal > autoheader > automake > autoconf > %configure > %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} Hmmm, if I do this to try to fix things then a make does trigger the error that Anthony sees. Of course if I run aclocal/automake as suggested the error happens again. Buggy auto* scripts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 17:43:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] New: gfs-kmod Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 Summary: gfs-kmod Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cfeist at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kernel.spec SRPM URL: people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kmod-0.1.0-0.2.6.17_1.2462.fc6.src.rpm Description: Global File System Version 1 Kernel modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 17:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021751.k72Hpsf7003045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-02 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called > > nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script? > > Yes, I see that in my logs, I don't know what is triggering this. In my case the > build finishes successfully even with the warnings and repeated configure calls. > And the software works. Weird. > > (In reply to comment #3) > > I think you should add NEWS,AUTHORS,Changelog files to your source code thru' > > adding patch. then changes in %build > > %build > > # remove compiler option unrecognized by gcc4x > > find . -type f -exec %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|-fmove-all-movables||g" {} \; > > aclocal > > autoheader > > automake > > autoconf > > %configure > > %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} > > Hmmm, if I do this to try to fix things then a make does trigger the error that > Anthony sees. Of course if I run aclocal/automake as suggested the error happens > again. Buggy auto* scripts? I had not realized that autogen.sh was there (that is what should be used in these cases, I think). Running it managed to bring everything up to date with the newer autotools versions and pointed to a missing build requirement (gettext-devel). After adding that I'm getting a complete build with no configure repeats or other warnings. I'll actually test the resulting packages and will post newer .spec and srpms when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 18:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021821.k72ILa7G008386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 ------- Additional Comments From linux at pilot.org.ua 2006-08-02 14:12 EST ------- Thank you for review, I will post a better version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 18:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021834.k72IYbOe010703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-02 14:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == > X This package dont have any License file. Added COPYING file to %doc > * I did not test package functionality > > However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called > nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script? Fixed by calling autogen.sh (and including the proper build requirements) New spec and source rpm available at: Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper-1.0.8-0.2.c.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 19:01:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021901.k72J15Eb015500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-02 14:51 EST ------- ok, here's a review: OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 8b4bfb078f2cc9e01f37d3d251672f75 tre-0.7.4.tar.bz2 8b4bfb078f2cc9e01f37d3d251672f75 tre-0.7.4.tar.bz2.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. See below - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. See below - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. Issues: 1. Not a blocker, but you might consider using a dist tag: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag 2. The devel package should Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 3. rpmlint has some output: (all warnings, but should be cleaned up) W: agrep summary-ended-with-dot Approximate grep utility. W: tre macro-in-%changelog doc W: tre macro-in-%changelog post W: tre mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: tre-devel summary-ended-with-dot Development files for use with the tre package. W: tre-devel no-documentation (the last one should be ignored) 4. You mention crashes with the x86_64 version. Perhaps the package should be ExcludeArch'ed for now until the bug is found/fixed? I don't have a x86_64 or ppc test machine here, perhaps someone else would like to give it a try on those arches before approval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 19:32:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021932.k72JWNr5019904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 ------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com 2006-08-02 15:22 EST ------- How do I get pyspi removed from FC6's Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 19:32:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021932.k72JWGP4019879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com 2006-08-02 15:22 EST ------- How do I get dogtail removed from FC6's Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 19:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608021946.k72JkCA6021534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-02 15:36 EST ------- Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FC6Status -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 20:00:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608022000.k72K0hjh022412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2006-08-02 15:51 EST ------- Note that I had to slightly modify kmodtool to get it to build properly. I also found that I had to run 'make prepare' in the kernel subdirectories as well. I don't know how to get around this (other than making sure it's done during the kernel-devel packages install). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 20:30:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608022030.k72KUk1R024272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 ------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com 2006-08-02 16:21 EST ------- Requested removal at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FC6Status -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 20:30:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608022030.k72KUw9f024317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 ------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com 2006-08-02 16:21 EST ------- Thanks. FWIW, though, it seems like the page should be called 'FE6Requests' or something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 21:51:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608022151.k72LpYDm030046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-02 17:42 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tre.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tre-0.7.4-2.src.rpm Fixed all of the above. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 22:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608022252.k72MqaV8032407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-08-02 18:43 EST ------- Consider calling the applet name in the GNOME applet list as "Computer Menu" instead of slab menu since slab is basically a internal code name. Also look at http://www.zephyrwood.org/chanders/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 2 23:10:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608022310.k72NA28i000481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-02 19:00 EST ------- Two issues left that I see: 1. rpmlint still complains about W: tre mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The top part of your tre.spec file uses tabs instead of spaces. This isn't a blocker, but might be nice to replace those tabs with spaces for consistancy. 2. Instead of ExclusiveArch, you should use ExcludeArch on x64... Even though there has been no testing on ppc, it should probibly be included until there is a report of it not working, it shouldn't be excluded just because you aren't able to test it. From the package review guidelines: - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 00:19:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030019.k730J3AT002343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 florin at andrei.myip.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |florin at andrei.myip.org ------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org 2006-08-02 20:09 EST ------- On a vanilla (non-mach) FC5 system, this is what happens: #################################################### # rpmbuild --rebuild --define fc5=1 freqtweak-0.6.1-4.src.rpm [snip] g++ -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-2.4 -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-1.2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2 -fexpensive-optimizations -funroll-loops -finline-functions -ffast-math -o freqtweak FTapp.o FTmainwin.o FTioSupport.o FTjackSupport.o FTprocessPath.o FTspectralEngine.o FTspectragram.o FTspectrumModifier.o FTactiveBarGraph.o FTutils.o FTportSelectionDialog.o FTconfigManager.o RingBuffer.o xml++.o FTprocI.o FTprocDelay.o FTprocEQ.o FTprocGate.o FTprocPitch.o FTprocOrderDialog.o FTdspManager.o FTprocLimit.o FTprocWarp.o FTpresetBlendDialog.o FTpresetBlender.o FTprocCompressor.o FTprocBoost.o FThelpWindow.o FTmodulatorI.o FTmodulatorManager.o FTmodulatorDialog.o FTmodulatorGui.o FTmodRandomize.o FTmodRotate.o FTmodRotateLFO.o FTmodValueLFO.o -lm -lfftw3f -lm -ljack -pthread -lwx_gtk2-2.4 -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz -lm -lsigc-1.2 /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2-2.4.so: undefined reference to `pango_x_get_context' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status ####################################################### Prior to that, I had to install a few dependencies. There was a weird conflict between compat-wxGTK2-devel and compat-wxGTK-devel and I had to uninstall the latter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 00:46:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030046.k730kWT2003462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-08-02 20:37 EST ------- Addressed these issues. New files: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-postgres.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-postgres-0.7.1-3.src.rpm Specifically: (1) Fixed the buildroot (was an oversight) (2) Fixed the way CFLAGS are handled, debuginfo package now looks sane (to me) (3) Didn't do anything with the issue of /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/ - this directory should be owned by ruby-libs (and it is on my i386 box with ruby-libs-1.8.4-8.fc5; it's %ruby_sitearch) - ruby-libs is a dependency (a) because it provides ruby(abi) and (b) since the package ruby requires it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 00:56:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030056.k730uFBv004327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-02 20:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > On a vanilla (non-mach) FC5 system, this is what happens: > > #################################################### > # rpmbuild --rebuild --define fc5=1 freqtweak-0.6.1-4.src.rpm I think it should be: --define "fc5 1" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 04:01:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 00:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030401.k7341GS7010459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-02 23:51 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent. I got following errors on SRPM W: gfs-kmod summary-not-capitalized gfs kernel modules Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. ==> Summary information must start with capital letter E: gfs-kmod no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. ==>Add chnagelog to SPEC file W: gfs-kmod strange-permission kmodtool 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. ==> Change permissions of kmodtool to 0644 and then build package E: gfs-kmod invalid-spec-name gfs-kernel.spec Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. ==> You have not followed kernel module packaging guidelines. Go thru' http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules. Kernel module package and SPEC name must start with %{kernel_module_name}-kmod E: gfs-kmod configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. ==> Add libdir to configure script Also you need to specify here why this kernel module is not in main kernel source tree yet and when will be it added to main kernel source tree? Also there is no gfs-kmod-common package you added to bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 04:29:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 00:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030429.k734TLJg011613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-03 00:20 EST ------- This is kenrel module package then how are you using configure script thats giving rpmlint error for not adding libdir?? When i mockbuild this package for fc6 i got + pushd _kmod_build_ ~/build/BUILD/gfs-kmod-0.1.0/_kmod_build_ ~/build/BUILD/gfs-kmod-0.1.0 + ./configure --kernel_src=/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2462.fc6-i686 --incdir=/usr/include Configuring Makefiles for your system... Can't open /usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2462.fc6-i686/include/linux/utsrelease.h at ./configure line 107. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65056 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 05:02:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030502.k73526ZC012589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-03 00:52 EST ------- You need to change utsrelease.h to uts.h, then configure succeeds But i got then compilation error /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/gfs-kernel-0.1.0/src/gfs/acl.c: In function ?gfs_check_acl?: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/gfs-kernel-0.1.0/src/gfs/acl.c:177: error: ?struct inode? has no member named ?i_private? i did not find any i_private member of gfs_inode struct in incore.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 05:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030503.k7353xJU012650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-03 00:54 EST ------- Hmmm. It still builds OK, but here's how the compiler is called: gcc -fPIC -I. -I/usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux -I/usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux -I. -DHAVE_SYS_UN_H -DHAVE_SOCKET -DHAVE_GETHOSTNAME -DHAVE_PQSETCLIENTENCODING -D HAVE_PG_ENCODING_TO_CHAR -DHAVE_PQESCAPESTRING -c postgres.c Wait, did you actually update the package? That looks to be the same package as before. The spec looks unchanged as well. BTW, I looked at the ruby-libs package on i386 and x86_64 and neither of them owns the sitearch directory. I see these directories: /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 but definitely not anything under those. This is backed up by repoquery: > repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux kdebindings-0:3.5.3-0.1.fc5.i386 > repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux kdebindings-0:3.5.3-0.1.fc5.x86_64 I do think this is a bug in base ruby package, but currently it looks like an arch-specific Ruby package needs to own that directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 05:32:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030532.k735WsS4013381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-03 01:23 EST ------- Still errors in this package Checking basic compilation tools ... You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper without this tool. Try adding pkgconfig in BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 06:51:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030651.k736pNCg015807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-03 02:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Note that I had to slightly modify kmodtool to get it to build properly. Why? kmodtool works fine for a lot of other packages and is on the way into redhat-rpm-config-8.0.40-1 -- modification per-package shouldn't be needed and not be allowed. Looking closer: -/lib/modules/${verrel}${variant}/extra/${kmod_name}/ +/lib/modules/${verrel}${variant}/kernel/extra/${kmod_name}/ This is wrong. Kernel-Modules have to live below /lib/modules/${verrel}${variant}/extra/ If GFS doesn't isntall them there fix your package. -BuildRequires: kernel${dashvariant}-devel-%{_target_cpu} = ${verrel} +#BuildRequires: kernel${dashvariant}-devel-%{_target_cpu} = ${verrel} +#BuildRequires: kernel${dashvariant}-devel = ${verrel} This seems totally wrong to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 07:13:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 03:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030713.k737DiNF016717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-03 03:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Still errors in this package > > Checking basic compilation tools ... > > You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper > without this tool. > > Try adding pkgconfig in BuildRequires If that fixes the build, then it probably points to a bug in one of the devel packages required to build this one. Any devel package containing a pkgconfig data file (.pc file) should itself Require: pkgconfig, so anything building using that devel package shouldn't need a buildreq of pkgconfig itself. The packaging committee recently voted to add this to the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/IRCLog20060706 So if you find any devel package pulled in as a buildreq by this package (look in the root.log from a mock build for a list of packages) that has a .pc file but no dependency on pkgconfig, I suggest you raise a bug on that package and add that bug to the "Bug 200941 depends on" field below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 08:31:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 04:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: manuel at todo-linux.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee.spec SRPM URL: http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee-0.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: Cherokee is a very fast, flexible and easy to configure Web Server. It supports the widespread technologies nowadays: FastCGI, SCGI, PHP, CGI, TLS and SSL encrypted connections, Virtual hosts, Authentication, on the fly encoding, Apache compatible log files, and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 08:44:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 04:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030844.k738iZEB024090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 mbroz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mbroz at redhat.com 2006-08-03 04:34 EST ------- Based on comment #2 I assume that there wll be dependency on cluster packages only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 08:48:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 04:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608030848.k738mhJW024612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: Version|devel |fc5 Alias| |Cherokee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 08:51:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 04:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] New: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SPECS/tuxpuck.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SRPMS/tuxpuck-0.8.2-1.src.rpm Description: TuxPuck is a shufflepuck game written in C using SDL. The player moves a pad around a board and tries to shoot down the puck through the opponents defense. Easy to play, difficult to win. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 10:18:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 06:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031018.k73AIjxd029958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-03 06:09 EST ------- Another approach to the python files issue is described at the bottom of this page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 10:48:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 06:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031048.k73Amkmj031865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-03 06:39 EST ------- SPEC looks clear, but mock build fails. You have to add BuildRequires: desktop-file-install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 11:51:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031151.k73BpkJp002921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-03 07:42 EST ------- Updated version here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/IServerd-2.4.14-2.src.rpm * Thu Aug 03 2006 Andy Shevchenko 2.4.14-2 - use full URL for sources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 11:59:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] New: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jfbterm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/jfbterm-0.4.7-0.15.fc6.src.rpm Description: JFBTERM/ME takes advantages of framebuffer device that is supported since linux kernel 2.2.x (at least on ix86 architecture) and make it enable to display multilingual text on console. It is developed on ix86 architecture, and it will works on other architectures such as linux/ppc. Features: * It works with framebuffer device instead of VGA. * It supports pcf format font * It is not so fast because it doesn't take any advantages of accelaration. * It also support coding systems other than ISO-2022, such as SHIFT-JIS by using iconv(3). * It is userland program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 12:02:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031202.k73C23tI003583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-03 07:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133548&action=view) log of rebuilding in mock on i386 Log of rebuilding src.rpm in mock on i386. Result of rpmlint: jfbterm-0.4.7-0.15.fc6.i386.rpm: jfbterm-0.4.7-0.15.fc6.src.rpm: W: jfbterm strange-permission jfbterm-0.4.7-configure-header.patch 0600 W: jfbterm strange-permission jfbterm-0.4.7-hang-onexit.patch 0600 W: jfbterm strange-permission jfbterm-0.4.7-mmap-newkernel.patch 0600 W: jfbterm strange-permission jfbterm-0.4.7-remove-warning.patch 0600 W: jfbterm strange-permission jfbterm-0.4.7-userspace.patch 0600 W: jfbterm strange-permission jfbterm-0.4.7.tar.gz 0600 W: jfbterm strange-permission efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2.tar.bz2 0600 W: jfbterm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs jfbterm-debuginfo-0.4.7-0.15.fc6.i386.rpm: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 12:08:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031208.k73C88MV003787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-03 07:58 EST ------- Note: I will bump the release number when this src.rpm is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 12:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031218.k73CIO6t004282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-03 08:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > At least I'm able to compile it fine in my build system (mach based). I thought > that the extras build system was actually setting fcx during the build... > perhaps it is not doing that? The Fedora build systems define the macros %{dist} and %{fedora} for this purpose. There is no %{fcX} style macro defined. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 13:10:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031310.k73DADRD006554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Component|Package Review |Package Review AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-08-03 09:00 EST ------- This isn't really going into Core at this point; we have apache for now. Moving to Extras Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 13:25:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] New: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pinball.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pinball-0.3.1-3.src.rpm Description: The Emilia Pinball project is an open source pinball simulator for linux and other unix systems. The current release is a stable and mature alpha. There are only two pinball machines to play with, it is however very addictive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 13:40:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031340.k73De4Z9008606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-03 09:30 EST ------- No and no... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 13:56:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031356.k73DuYIP009855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-03 09:47 EST ------- Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Add pkgconfig to this line %files devel Isn't there an .so file for this directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 14:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031400.k73E0ltk010241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-03 09:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > Add pkgconfig to this line > Erm, it doesn't install any pc files, so pkgconfig isn't needed. > %files devel > > Isn't there an .so file for this directory? > Notice that it uses %{_libdir}/%{name} not just %{_libdir}, %{_libdir}/%{name} contains plugins which get loaded by there full soname by ltdl, which finds this name by looking at the .la files, so in essence the .la files replace the .so files for the purpose of plugin loading. The .so files also are not needed to link against, since this are not libs but plugins. The -devel package is to develop new plugins, not to develop programs using the existing ones, hence no .so files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 14:03:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031403.k73E3iaj010454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-03 09:54 EST ------- Sorry, didn't spot those! I'll get on reviewing the package as soon as my buildsys stops playing silly buggers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 15:19:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] New: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl-0.4.0-0.1.rc4.src.rpm Description: AllegroGL is an Allegro add-on that allows you to use OpenGL alongside Allegro. You use OpenGL for your rendering to the screen, and Allegro for miscellaneous tasks like gathering input, doing timers, getting cross-platform portability, loading data, and drawing your textures. So this library fills the same hole that things like glut do. AllegroGL also automatically exposes most, if not all, OpenGL extensions available to user programs. This means you no longer have to manually load them; extension management is already done for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 15:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031537.k73FbuGO017309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-03 11:28 EST ------- Hmm, I just noticed that this installs an autoheader generated header, which is BAD! I'll whip up a fix for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 15:44:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031544.k73FiK9b017509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-08-03 11:34 EST ------- Also, any custom applications added to the default list of favorite applications is not retained on reboot. The context menu on the application browser says "Remove from favorites" but the favorites list doesnt show the application. Removing and readding it works. The slab menu description in the gnome add to panel dialog box has a typo - "featurefull". It can say "Feature rich" instead. 20060801cvs package requires dbus-glib-devel which doesnt exist on a FC5 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 16:01:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031601.k73G1Lcg019053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-03 11:52 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tre.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tre-0.7.4-3.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 16:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031623.k73GNZCp020572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-08-03 12:14 EST ------- Rats, I am really sorry about that - yesterday wasn't my day. I forgot the crucial step of uploading the rpm's from my local machine to p.r.c. Now I did (and double-checked): Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-postgres.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-postgres-0.7.1-4.src.rpm You are absolutely right about sitearchdir; for some reason, I kept checking archdir (which is owned by ruby-libs). I filed a bug against the ruby package for that (bug 201208) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 16:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031626.k73GQbjW020780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-08-03 12:17 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pyicq-t-0.7-3.fc5.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/5/SRPMS/pyicq-t-0.7-3.fc5.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Aug 2 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.7-3 - Rename more stuff to pyicq-t -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 16:29:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031629.k73GTvZf021132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-08-03 12:20 EST ------- The release has the following problems: - aplus.el contains /usr/local/bin/a+ instead of /usr/bin/a+ - on startup of a+ /usr/lib/idap.+: No such file or directory somethere a path /usr/lib must be changed to /usr/lib/a+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 16:43:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031643.k73GhBuY021939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-08-03 12:33 EST ------- Further problems with font packages: - file /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl is not owned by any package file /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/pcf is not owned by any package file /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/TTF is not owned by any package - The fonts.dir and fonts.scale files should be shipped with the packages. - AFAIK, /usr/share/X11/fonts is not in the font path. The KAPL font is not seen by fontconfig, better put it in a subdirectory of /usr/share/fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 16:59:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031659.k73GxALT022726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From alikins at redhat.com 2006-08-03 12:49 EST ------- Running this on FC5+CCRMA, all of the buttons in freqtweak show up blacked out for me. I'd post a screenshot, but the laptop is already packed away for my vacation ;-> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 17:46:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031746.k73HkvNf025586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-03 13:37 EST ------- I can approve your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 17:53:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031753.k73HrV0X025944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-03 13:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Still errors in this package > > Checking basic compilation tools ... > > You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper > without this tool. You are corrrect but pkgconfig is being pulled in by other dependencies. See below for more details. > Try adding pkgconfig in BuildRequires This is not happening in my build system (mach based). In my case pkgconfig is being pulled in by either: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel libsigc++-devel libsndfile-devel libsamplerate-devel alsa-lib-devel (I tested this by installing the build dependencies one by one manually in my build system and checking on whether pkgconfig was installed as well) Looks like liblo-devel is _not_ pulling in pkgconfig but has a .pc file: /usr/lib/pkgconfig/liblo.pc (version liblo-devel-0.23-6.fc5) Also appears to be the case for libxml2-devel (libxml2-devel-2.6.23-1.2) What I don't understand is why, in your case, pkgconfig is not being pulled in by the _other_ build requirements? It is happening in my build system. Exactly what build system are you using and how is it configured? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 18:04:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031804.k73I4dOL026395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-03 13:55 EST ------- New version which has the autoheader stuff fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl-0.4.0-0.2.rc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 18:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031807.k73I7lZr026573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-08-03 13:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133570) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133570&action=view) Make aclocal shut up -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 18:09:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031809.k73I9bnu026712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-08-03 14:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133571) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133571&action=view) Fixes for the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 18:10:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031810.k73IAQdN026777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #133571|text/x-patch |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #133571|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 18:23:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031823.k73INYAm027973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-08-03 14:14 EST ------- I'm not a sponsor so this review is informal: * You should pass option --disable-bind or --enable-bind to configure script. Without it rebuild of a package in different build environment can lead to different dependencies/features of final RPM. * Debian package adds option --enable-pthread. IMHO it's worth to enable it, too. * Add CFLAGS_LIBGADU="$CFLAGS" to configure script. Right now package is being built without gcc optimizations/security features. * Mark proper files as %lang(pl). Please see http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-August/msg00090.html for more information * Replace %files with %%files. Hint: you should run rpmlint on srpms, too: [rpm-build at X RPMS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/libgadu-20060726-2.src.rpm W: libgadu macro-in-%changelog files [rpm-build at X RPMS]$ I have changed $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot} because it's shorter. You can revert this change if you don't like it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 18:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031833.k73IXjXm029143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|188941 | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-03 14:24 EST ------- Ok, now I see that if I define fc5 to 1 it builds. My bad. However, I'm getting the same results as Adrian in comment #6. I'll look into this a bit tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 18:55:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031855.k73Itlfm031900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-08-03 14:46 EST ------- The errors from linking libedataserver and libcamel, which both comes from the evolution-data-server RPM package, is technically out of scope for this package as far as I can tell. gnome-phone-manager does not use either nspr or the rest of the deps directly, only indirectly through evolution-data-server. The problem is that the RPM for evolution-data-server does not bring in its dependencies. I think it is a problem with evolution-data-server on x64 not picking up its own dependencies correctly... I was under the impression that this did not occur in mock on i386? (I'm working on the rest of the issues.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 19:02:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031902.k73J2bMp032622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-03 14:53 EST ------- kmod was allowed by FESCo (review pending) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 19:05:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031905.k73J52iC000490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-03 14:55 EST ------- Will investigate on the favorite applications, 'it works well here'. but i'll check on a few more computers including on a FC5 one.. Guess the dbus-glib-devel BR could be conditional? i'll run it thru mock without and see how it performs without that BR Thanks for the spelling sugestion, i'll incorperate that asap expect to have the next release out, with a few more fixes, tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 19:42:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031942.k73JgS8p003799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-03 15:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > At least I'm able to compile it fine in my build system (mach based). I thought > > that the extras build system was actually setting fcx during the build... > > perhaps it is not doing that? > > The Fedora build systems define the macros %{dist} and %{fedora} for this purpose. > There is no %{fcX} style macro defined. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Sorry, I missed this. Easy to fix. (In reply to comment #6) > Running this on FC5+CCRMA, all of the buttons in freqtweak show up blacked out > for me. I'd post a screenshot, but the laptop is already packed away for my > vacation ;-> Strange, I don't see that. In my test machine some of the buttons (those on the left of the editable frequency domain panes) have a font that is too large - the text is slightly larger than the button itself, but I can see the text and they work fine. Maybe a missing font in your machine (unlikely, I know)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 19:52:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608031952.k73JqeVY004832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2006-08-03 15:43 EST ------- In response to Comment #2 - Summary isn't capitalized because I was using the kernel module package guidlines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules). The line they show is what I'm using: Summary: %{kmod_name} kernel modules - Changelog has been added - kmodtool needs to have that permission because it is script that is run from the .spec file - The .spec file does end in .spec, I'm not sure why this is an error. - According to the kernel module specification, the name of the module should be specified this way: (which it is) Name: %{kmod_name}-kmod - This package will most likely never be in the mainstream kernel as it provides support for GFS1 and we are only attempting to get GFS2 into the kernel. - The userspace utilities are in gfs-utils, I'll get those in the proper format according to the kernel module package guidlines. In response to comment #3 & #4 - I've updated the kmodtool (from comment #5) this should work better now. - Unfortunately utsrelease.h has the data that we need (#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.17-1.2462.fc6"), uts.h doesn't. In response to comment #5 - I've put kmodtool back to the original, I had made modifications to get it to work with an earlier version of the .spec file, and no longer needed those modifications. New SRPM/spec are here: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kmod-0.1.0-1.2.6.17_1.2505.fc6.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kernel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 20:08:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032008.k73K8q1e005857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-08-03 15:59 EST ------- Thanks! Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/libgadu-20060802-1.src.rpm Upstream didn't agree to release standalone libgadu tarballs. :/ Maybe I could use CVS? Otherwise I have to package main ekg program (which has problems with UTF-8), with libgadu as subpackage. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 20:33:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032033.k73KXOkZ007718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-03 16:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Upstream didn't agree to release standalone libgadu tarballs. :/ Maybe I could > use CVS? Otherwise I have to package main ekg program (which has problems with > UTF-8), with libgadu as subpackage. :( I don't think so. If your reviewer agrees, you'll can copy upstream source to your own server. I think this is the best solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 20:37:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032037.k73KbIYj008084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-08-03 16:28 EST ------- New version with all but the above mentioned issue fixed: Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-3.src.rpm I am however uncertain about the %check thing, I cannot find this in the review guidelines or elsewhere, can you give me a pointer to information? There is perhaps something all new I need to learn here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 21:02:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032102.k73L2ckn010063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-03 16:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Upstream didn't agree to release standalone libgadu tarballs. :/ Maybe I could > > use CVS? Otherwise I have to package main ekg program (which has problems with > > UTF-8), with libgadu as subpackage. :( > > I don't think so. If your reviewer agrees, you'll can copy upstream source > to your own server. I think this is the best solution. I don't know if there's precedent, but given the situation I don't believe hosting a dated copy of the tarball on a different host is unreasonable. I'd make sure that the tarball itself is dated tho -- e.g. libgadu-20060801.tar.gz or somesuch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 22:02:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166205] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032202.k73M2hf2014654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166205 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-03 17:53 EST ------- Someone on IRC acked about whether alleyoop had been submitted and a search turned up this review, stalled for eleven months now. Any chance of anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 22:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166205] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032219.k73MJeq9015303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166205 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-03 18:10 EST ------- That was me :) I just finished updating the package to 0.9.2 and it seems working fine on my FC5. I could be interested in getting this into FE, it does a nice pair with the other package I submitted (bug 191473), so if nothing moves on I could try to hijack it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 22:21:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166205] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032221.k73MLrVW015381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166205 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-03 18:12 EST ------- bug 191743 ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 23:12:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032312.k73NCBhb017715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-03 19:02 EST ------- Fails to build : you need to remove the smp_flags as it causes a race condition LoaderModule.cpp has a lot of errors in - the majority of them are the likes of lt_dlinit not declared in this scope. I'm actually starting to thing this is gcc being overly strict as amaya has this problem as well and I'm unable to see why it should be by examining the source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 3 23:40:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608032340.k73NeY5H019019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-03 19:31 EST ------- I'm actually quite concerned about the number of File listed twice warnings given during the %build stage rpmlint warnings - srpm W: cyphesis macro-in-%changelog files building under mock - will report back them. In the meantime, please refer back to report #9 and rebuild with the changes recommended in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 00:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040003.k740397n019712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-03 19:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > rpmlint warnings - srpm > W: cyphesis macro-in-%changelog files My bad. I'll fix this in the next package. > In the meantime, please refer back to report #9 and rebuild with the changes > recommended in there. If I use the steps in comment #9 then I've essentially replaced a slightly messy looking %files section with an even messier scriptlet in %install. I'm not so sure that it makes the spec file any more readable. But I won't argue too much on this point. If you prefer how the spec looks with the scriptlet from comment #9, then I'll use it. I should have a new package ready in a few hours after a little more testing (assuming mock behaves this time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 00:28:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040028.k740SDJn020369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-08-03 20:19 EST ------- The "exit" item in the side bar doesnt show suspend as a option. We need that there since the gnome main menu bar does provide it in FC5 and above currently. I am not sure how SUSE (as slab upstream) integrates suspend in their system. Might be worth looking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 00:29:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040029.k740TR8J020487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-03 20:20 EST ------- New packages with the %install scriptlet for generating the python file list. This also replaces fedora-usermgmt with useradd -r, as a fix id is not necessary for this package: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis-0.5.8-4.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis.spec FC6-i386 builds fail for me right now due to repo problems, so I've only been able to test building in mock on FC6-x86_64. I haven't been able to test the useradd bits in the package, though, as I don't have a FC6-x86_64 machine to install into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 01:52:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040152.k741qbTm023337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-03 21:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133604) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133604&action=view) Build log in mock (failure result) ========== I cannot formally review your package ========== However rebuilding this package in mock fails on i386. See the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 02:17:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040217.k742HRJg024695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-03 22:07 EST ------- + sources match + GPL'd + builds in mock, FC5 x86_64 + no missing BRs + devel package for .pc + spec readable + locales handled by %find_lang + .desktop file + proper scriptlets + runs, builds Hello World. + permissions OK + file ownerships OK rpmlint: W: monodevelop strange-permission monodevelop.spec 0666 Ignore. E: monodevelop hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib E: monodevelop hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/pkgconfig/:%{_datadir}/pkgconfig/:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH Both needed for libdir hack. E: monodevelop no-binary E: monodevelop only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Expected for mono. E: monodevelop-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Not much debug info in mono packages. Remove. W: monodevelop-devel no-documentation Ignore. Note that this does not install to %{_libdir} yet APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 03:04:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040304.k7434S1B026129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-03 22:55 EST ------- Everything looks fixed up and therefore this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug as NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, don't forget to submit a bug against the package once it's got a bugzilla component about the breakage on x64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 03:51:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040351.k743pfx5027442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-03 23:42 EST ------- I did mock build for development version for FC6. There i get that error but when i check my build system strange i found pkg-config is installed/pulled already and installed under /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root/usr/bin/pkg-config I am really confused on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 04:00:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040400.k7440peX027684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-03 23:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > In response to Comment #2 > - Summary isn't capitalized because I was using the kernel module package > guidlines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules). The line > they show is what I'm using: > > Summary: %{kmod_name} kernel modules > If you will see other SPEC files for kernel modules then you will see its not mandatory to copy same wording written in kernel module packaging guidelines for Summary. > - Changelog has been added > - kmodtool needs to have that permission because it is script that is run from > the .spec file oops i forgot you are very correct. > - The .spec file does end in .spec, I'm not sure why this is an error. Still i think you should change SPEC file name to gfs-kmod.spec. I did that and didnt got any rpmlint error for SPEC file name. > - According to the kernel module specification, the name of the module should be > specified this way: (which it is) > Name: %{kmod_name}-kmod > > - This package will most likely never be in the mainstream kernel as it provides > support for GFS1 and we are only attempting to get GFS2 into the kernel. > - The userspace utilities are in gfs-utils, I'll get those in the proper format > according to the kernel module package guidlines. OK > > In response to comment #3 & #4 > - I've updated the kmodtool (from comment #5) this should work better now. > - Unfortunately utsrelease.h has the data that we need (#define UTS_RELEASE > "2.6.17-1.2462.fc6"), uts.h doesn't. But i found only uts.h. May be i am missing something, can you tell me what am i missing that made my system not to show utsrelease.h under installed kernel sources. > > In response to comment #5 > - I've put kmodtool back to the original, I had made modifications to get it to > work with an earlier version of the .spec file, and no longer needed those > modifications. > > New SRPM/spec are here: > http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kmod-0.1.0-1.2.6.17_1.2505.fc6.src.rpm > http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kernel.spec > Will check now your new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 04:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040408.k7448WIx027889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org 2006-08-03 23:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133610) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133610&action=view) black buttons Built it on FC5, buttons are black. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 04:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040410.k744A7KL027948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org 2006-08-04 00:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > I think it should be: > --define "fc5 1" Builds fine, but when running it the buttons are black, see the previously created attachement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 04:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040429.k744TFJ4028488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-08-04 00:20 EST ------- Issues should be fixed now. Spec URL: http://daniel.rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SPECS/btsco-kmod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SRPMS/btsco-kmod-common-0.42-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 04:52:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040452.k744qBr0029083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-04 00:42 EST ------- I just did mockbuild for this package and found same error utlrelease.h not found also, as previously suggested if you chage Summary information and spec name to gfs-kmod.spec then rpmlint will give only single error that is of kmodtool permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 05:10:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 01:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040510.k745A17I029531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-04 01:00 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent W: btsco-kmod-common incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.42.fc5.2 0.42-2.fc6 Your last entry in %changelog contains a version that is not coherent with the current version of your package. You Changelog entries are wrong. Change 0.42.fc5.1 to 0.42.1.fc5 and 0.42.fc.2 to 0.42.2.fc5 E: btsco-kmod-common zero-length /usr/share/doc/btsco-kmod-common-0.42/NEWS E: btsco-kmod-common zero-length /usr/share/doc/btsco-kmod-common-0.42/ChangeLog E: btsco-kmod-common zero-length /usr/share/doc/btsco-kmod-common-0.42/AUTHORS if there is no content in all above 3 files then rpmlint will show error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 06:53:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 02:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608040653.k746r1FQ000306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-04 02:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Fails to build : you need to remove the smp_flags as it causes a race condition Done, sorry I used to have it set to -j3 in my .rpmrc but I've changed it to -j1 because lately I've been packaging a few huge c++ apps and my machine gut real sluggish with -j3 (I don't have a seperate builder like you do). > LoaderModule.cpp has a lot of errors in - the majority of them > are the likes of lt_dlinit not declared in this scope. > > I'm actually starting to thing this is gcc being overly strict as amaya has this > problem as well and I'm unable to see why it should be by examining the source Are you sure it doesn't start with a missing header error before those, as |i forgot to add a BR for libtool-ltdl-devel, which IMHO is the likely cause of this. Here is a new version with smp_flags removed and the BR added: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pinball.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pinball-0.3.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 10:36:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 06:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041036.k74AaCtE015307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-04 06:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > rpmlint warnings - srpm > > W: cyphesis macro-in-%changelog files > > My bad. I'll fix this in the next package. > > > In the meantime, please refer back to report #9 and rebuild with the changes > > recommended in there. > > If I use the steps in comment #9 then I've essentially replaced a slightly messy > looking %files section with an even messier scriptlet in %install. I'm not so > sure that it makes the spec file any more readable. But I won't argue too much > on this point. If you prefer how the spec looks with the scriptlet from comment > #9, then I'll use it. If you only have three or fewer directories containing .py* files then it doesn't really make sense to use the script-based approach as the files list is quite clear. The script approach really has benefits for bigger packages like moin and twisted, where there can be dozens of directories involved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 12:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041253.k74CrxUT022504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-04 08:44 EST ------- I've added cachefilesd to dist-fc6 as owned by steved. It is too late for Test2, but if this is a blocker for RHEL5 B1 you can get it included there. I'm a bit confused, if its not a Requires of something, nor in Comps anyplace, how will a user actually install it? Please close this bug when you've built it into dist-fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 12:54:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041254.k74CsHd7022547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 12:54:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200772] Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041254.k74CsIta022563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 12:54:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200760] Review Request: dogtail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041254.k74CsfGV022639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dogtail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200760 Bug 200760 depends on bug 200772, which changed state. Bug 200772 Summary: Review Request: pyspi: Move from Extras to Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200772 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 12:58:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041258.k74CwEEW022854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-04 08:48 EST ------- I've added lvm2-cluster to dist-fc6 as owned by mbroz. It is too late for Test2, however if it is a blocker for RHEL5 Beta1 you can probably get it included there. Please close this report when built for dist-fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 13:17:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041317.k74DHaJn023768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 mbroz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mbroz at redhat.com 2006-08-04 09:07 EST ------- Built into dist-fc6-HEAD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 13:36:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041336.k74Da1AE024571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-04 09:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.31.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Aug 4 2006 Alain Portal 2.31.0-1 - Update to 2.31.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 14:21:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166205] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041421.k74EL3V1027587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166205 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-08-04 10:11 EST ------- Hijack away. Just make sure you test the cases that Michael Schwendt pointed out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 14:22:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041422.k74EMN9n027668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From agk at redhat.com 2006-08-04 10:12 EST ------- In RHEL, the package currently gets released separately in cluster suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 14:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] New: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: candyz0416 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.1-2.src.rpm Description: gcin is a Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese. It features a better GTK user interface. Also see http://cle.linux.org.tw/gcin/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 14:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041431.k74EVaUr028416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 candyz0416 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 14:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041439.k74EdQG5029072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 candyz0416 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 15:38:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041538.k74FcXE1000960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-04 11:29 EST ------- Note that FESCo needs to approve this module before reviews begin, and before that can happen we need several pieces of information, including a statement from the upstream developer as to why this is not in the main kernel tree and when it is planned to be added. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 16:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041610.k74GAT4d003153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-04 12:01 EST ------- Not that it would be a big issue at all, but kmodtool is defined as "bash kmodtool" in the specfile so there seems to be no reason for it to be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 16:11:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041611.k74GBCMt003212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-08-04 12:01 EST ------- I have upgraded to socat-1.5.0.0. This now includes the proper configure.in, so that issue is resolved. Can someone test if it builds properly under mock now? ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/socat/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/socat-1.5.0.0-1.src.rpm ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/socat/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/socat.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 17:10:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041710.k74HAnwv006535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-04 13:01 EST ------- Next time please attach: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core/root/builddir/build/BUILD/xxx/config.log too when a mock build fails because of a ./configure failure. I've done a mockbuild myself on my painfull slow internet connection and now have this fixed, it was missing BRs for libXext-devel and libXpm-devel. New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl-0.4.0-0.3.rc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 17:12:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041712.k74HCsO3006699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-04 13:03 EST ------- p.s. I forgot to mention that I'll be on a short vacation till wednesday, so don't expect any response from me till then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 17:17:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041717.k74HHk0a006952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-04 13:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > I think it should be: > > --define "fc5 1" > > Builds fine, but when running it the buttons are black, see the previously > created attachement. I bet it is an interaction with the desktop theme. Could you try with the default theme? I'll test this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 17:20:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041720.k74HKsh2007093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-08-04 13:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I did mock build for development version for FC6. Does this happen on fc5? > There i get that error but > when i check my build system strange i found pkg-config is installed/pulled > already and installed under > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root/usr/bin/pkg-config > > I am really confused on this. Could you please post the error log from the build? I don't get that error so I can't know where it is happening and what is the surrounding context. It could be that the name of the pkgconfig script of one of the dependencies has changed in > fc5 and that's why an error is being reported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 17:28:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041728.k74HSs8g007500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-04 13:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I bet it is an interaction with the desktop theme. Could you try with the > default theme? I'll test this later. I'm using clearlooks, which (I think) is the default Fedora theme. Let me mess around with this as well. Perhaps strace will provide some insight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 18:09:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041809.k74I9lcN009335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 18:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041829.k74ITcJ5011080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org 2006-08-04 14:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > I bet it is an interaction with the desktop theme. Could you try with the > default theme? I'll test this later. Can't test it right now, but anyway I never change the theme. I'm using whatever comes default with FC5. The only thing I usually change in the way of desktop look and feel is enable "Select windows when the mouse moves over them" which is definitely unrelated. I'll see if I can tweak a few things tonight. My feeling is that it's an issue related to some kind of toolkit used by this software. The widgets are clearly wrong. Maybe my system and yours have different libraries installed? Some hidden dependency not explicited by the spec file? Or some kind of difference in the minor version number in a lib somewhere? What happens if you build the src.rpm on a clean fresh FC5 install? (only Fedora Main, Updates and Extras) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 18:40:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041840.k74IeDJt011953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-08-04 14:31 EST ------- Okay Michael, I changed what you were complaining about and pushed -4. Otherwise I won't get BitlBee into Fedora Extras before Windows Vista ;-) Waiting for FE- ACCEPT now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 19:37:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041937.k74JbTw6015704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-08-04 15:28 EST ------- I should upload the package today and open the bug report. If there is no time, it will be online by sunday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 19:42:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608041942.k74Jg485015831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-04 15:32 EST ------- Package imported and devel build successful. FC-4 and FC-5 branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 20:48:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042048.k74KmfvF021076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-04 16:39 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint output clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Spec file legible and in Am. English * GPL license ok, license file included * Source matches upstream: fc839abc2b1f3eafae397e1ed6487079 tuxpuck-0.8.2.tar.gz * Builds in mock on FC4, FC5, and FC6 for both i386 and x86_64 * Not relocatable * No locales * No shared libs * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where necessary * macro usage consistent * .desktop file installed correctly * no -devel package needed * no need for -doc subpackage * Does not own directories that it should not. * Package runs, but won't let me win. ;) MUSTFIX ======= * Remove the comment about 'doesn't build with optflags', since you are building it with %optflags * Add BR: desktop-file-utils, as mentioned in comment #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 20:56:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201405] New: Review Request: openmpi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201405 Summary: Review Request: openmpi Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: already in cvs SRPM URL: ditto Description: openmpi is an mpi implementation that includes direct infiniband fabric support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 20:58:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201405] Review Request: openmpi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042058.k74KwX6J021574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmpi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201405 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Red Hat Enterprise Linux | |Beta Version|devel |5.0.0 Component|Package Review |Package Review QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 21:38:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042138.k74LcG2g023419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 22:16:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042216.k74MGPV2025154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-04 18:07 EST ------- Okay, I'll be on a short vacation though, so don't expect any reply from me until wednesday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 23:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042300.k74N0b46026643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-04 18:51 EST ------- FC-4 and FC-5 built, closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 23:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042300.k74N0cdO026656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 Bug 187610 depends on bug 187609, which changed state. Bug 187609 Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 23:16:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201417] New: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201417 Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/alleyoop.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/alleyoop-0.9.2-1.src.rpm Description: Alleyoop is a graphical front-end to the increasingly popular Valgrind memory checker for x86 GNU/ Linux using the Gtk+ widget set and other GNOME libraries for the X-Windows environment. Features include a right-click context menu to intelligently suppress errors or launch an editor on the source file/jumping to the exact line of the error condition. A searchbar at the top of the viewer can be used to limit the viewable errors to those that match the regex criteria entered. Also included is a fully functional Suppressions editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 23:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201417] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042322.k74NMH25027169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201417 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-04 19:13 EST ------- This was already submitted in bug 166205 (which should be marked as duplicate of the new request). I have still to address the remarks made by Michael Schwendt in the original bug. Any suggestion about how to proceed is welcome. Please note I will be out of town for a few days, so do not expect prompt replies until next week-end -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 23:33:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042333.k74NXhQI027396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-08-04 19:24 EST ------- Ok. The package is uploaded and I'll file the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 23:37:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] New: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://nikolai.thecodergeek.com/widelands OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ReportedBy: brkamikaze at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com CC: wart at kobold.org All the files are hosted at http://nikolai.thecodergeek.com/widelands. The update time on the bottom of the page is incorrect, it will be fixed when I re-upload the files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 4 23:41:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608042341.k74NfdfR027670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://nikolai.thecodergeek.| |com/widelands | OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-04 19:32 EST ------- Please try to use the Package Review template when submitting new packages for review so that the various bug fields get set appropriately: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 00:16:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608050016.k750Gsmd028596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-04 20:07 EST ------- There's a few things that need to be addressed before this can be approved. * Is there a reason you want to package files from CVS instead of the official file release? * Source1: is a tarball with a single .desktop file. Don't bother making a tarball for a single file. Just use "Source1: widelands.desktop". This will remove the need for the egregious tar command in %prep * Reduce the Summary: to a single sentence, without the leading 'A' * In your %install scriptlet, try using 'cp -a' instead of 'cp -r' to preserve timestamps * Remove the CVS directories in %prep, not in %install * Never refer to '/usr/src/redhat' in the spec file. It is highly unlikely that this directory will actually be used when the package is built. You can refer to your desktop file as %{SOURCED1} instead. * Don't use '/usr' in your build command. Use %{_prefix} instead. Also, 'share/widelands' should be '%{_datadir}/%{name}' I'd suggest reading through the packaging guidelines to become more familiar with the Fedora packaging rules: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 02:13:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608050213.k752DJp9031360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-08-04 22:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > > but > > the fact is that zaptel is GPL, so is this really the right place to draw the > > proverbial line in the sand? > > Well, one kernel-developer is hightly respect thinks the line should be drawn > even earlier -- see Bug 189400 comment 9 I would like to point out that the same person that made that comment actually _uses_ this module even. I consider myself a fairly practical person that isn't swayed by politics often. However, I agree with Thorsten for this particular module. The reasoning from upstream is simply ridiculous. One of the 3rd party repos would be a better candidate for this module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 04:35:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608050435.k754ZBSi006025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-05 00:25 EST ------- so kmodtool permissions must be 0666 not 0755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 05:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 01:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608050504.k7554VsG008404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-05 00:55 EST ------- i have FC5 system when i give rpmbuild -ba sooperlooper.spec it worked fine. Created SRPM,RPMS when i did mock build using FC6 development repository i got following errors in build.log Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52473 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd sooperlooper-1.0.8c + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + find . -type f -exec /usr/bin/perl -p -i -e 's|-fmove-all-movables||g' '{}' ';' + ./autogen.sh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Checking basic compilation tools ... You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper without this tool. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52473 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52473 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 08:54:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 04:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608050854.k758sJ7w021029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-05 04:44 EST ------- No, there's no need to make it group or world writable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 09:22:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 05:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608050922.k759MYKe021957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-05 05:13 EST ------- Oops, thanks for noticing, fixed. Spec/packages are at Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.1-11.at.src.rpm [%{python_libdir} is something defined in ATrpms' buildsystem, and it slipped into the package, sorry.] I also fixed the pyo issue. About cmake's versioned dependency: I didn't find the required version for cmake for netcdf at first. Then I found it as well as a yet stricter requirement for building all examples (2.0.4). Since it isn't really a blocker for Fedora (there is no older cmake than 2.4.3 and some people even suggest not putting a versioned dependency at all in such cases) and the rebuilds take a long time, the package + spec above don't have this versioned dependency yet, but I'll put it in place in the next package update, because apart from technical considerations at the very least this is properly documenting a non-trivial dependency information. Should -11 be the one that get's approved I'll upload a -12 package with this trivial fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 10:18:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 06:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201437] New: Review Request: Glom - Database designer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201437 Summary: Review Request: Glom - Database designer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/glom.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/glom-1.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: Glom lets you design database systems - the database and the user interface. Glom has high-level features such as relationships, lookups, related fields, related records, calculated fields, drop-down choices, searching, reports, users and groups. It has Numeric, Text, Date, Time, Boolean, and Image field types. Glom systems require almost no programming, but you may use Python for calculated fields or buttons. Glom uses the PostgreSQL database backend. Notes to reviewer: please review the dependent bugzilla entries first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 10:19:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 06:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201437] Review Request: Glom - Database designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051019.k75AJSCc024906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glom - Database designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201437 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198613, 199941, 199943 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 10:19:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 06:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199941] Review Request: gnome-python2-gda In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051019.k75AJo07024938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-python2-gda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199941 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201437 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 10:20:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 06:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051020.k75AK1vU024953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201437 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 11:07:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051107.k75B72ZT027468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-08-05 06:57 EST ------- Ok,now it works, but if I do the command "make tag into ss5/FC-5" cvs answer to me: [root at minix FC-5]# make tag cvs tag -c ss5-3_5_9-1 For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs ERROR: The tag ss5-3_5_9-1 is already applied on a different branch ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches ss5-3_5_9-1:devel:mricchet:1150827849 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 11:24:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051124.k75BOSdG028295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-08-05 07:15 EST ------- I'm packaging the files from CVS because the official release is REALLY old, and they're developing rather slowly. All the remaining will be fixed and uploaded today or tomorrow. And I'd like to know if there is a recursive "install" command, or if I need to use "for i in *" or just recursive "cp". And I didn't find the link to the "Package Review Request" and didn't have the time to look for it, so I just guessed the rest of the info. Sorry for the haste, I'm having bad hardware problems. It will be fixed soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 11:31:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051131.k75BV7mq028621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-08-05 07:21 EST ------- The bug is filed as bug #201418 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 13:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 09:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051316.k75DG2TC031491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-05 09:06 EST ------- BTW, did someone point Kevin P. Fleming from digium to this discussion? He seems not be CCed (and I don't want to CC him). Maybe he/digium change their mind when they hear that some of us don't want this module in Extras. He should probably also read the discussion on fedora-devel: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-August/msg00119.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 13:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 09:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051331.k75DVaVw031911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-08-05 09:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > BTW, did someone point Kevin P. Fleming from digium to this discussion? He seems > not be CCed (and I don't want to CC him). Maybe he/digium change their mind when > they hear that some of us don't want this module in Extras. > > He should probably also read the discussion on fedora-devel: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-August/msg00119.html I'm the one that invited him to the discussion... I'll ask him to check out the followup discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 14:05:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051405.k75E5RsU000497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-08-05 09:56 EST ------- The binaries are up and the syntax highlighted spec file too. As I'm on Windows, I didn't update the spec and recreated the SRPM. They will be fixed and uploaded tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 15:15:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 11:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051515.k75FFDHS002223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-05 11:05 EST ------- Rpmlint output to the newest srpm: W: libgadu macro-in-%changelog configure W: libgadu macro-in-%changelog lang You have to simply change %configure to %%configure and %lang(pl) to %%lang(pl). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 15:23:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 11:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051523.k75FNo95002372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-05 11:14 EST ------- And one another thing: shouldn't libgadu.so.3.5 be stripped? Make install strips it, but you unstrips it in %%files section. You can fix it in two ways, either change defattr macro to %defattr(-,root,root,-) or add %attr(0755,root,root) before libgadu.so.3.5 file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 18:03:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 14:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051803.k75I3O8f006667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 13:54 EST ------- Has the updated version of cairomm been added to FE yet? It's still not linking here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 18:42:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 14:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051842.k75IgF7S008992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-05 14:33 EST ------- MD5sums: ed346ba8fb71514e5be2202d50a17568 ../dstat-0.6.3-4.src.rpm a2df5d7fecc0115f8eef84141a068e86 dstat-0.6.3.tar.bz2 0862411cacd97a31182dd2b0199c512f dstat.spec Most previously noted problems fixed. Here's what remains: * Remove the execute permissions from the scripts in the examples directory. * macros (Like %clean) are expanded even when they're in the changelog section. You'll want to escape the macro in your changelog with an additional "%":: - Removed the erroneous commenting of the %%clean section After you fix these issues, I can do a last check and APPROVE the package. You will also need to be sponsored so you can import the package into the repository. I am willing to do this if you show your understanding of the packaging guidelines. This is best done by reviewing someone else's package according to the packaging guidelines and lettting me know so I can watch the process. You can refer to these two documents for help:: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 19:19:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 15:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608051919.k75JJup8010536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 15:10 EST ------- --mode 644 \ Is this required for the desktop icon? Have you asked upstream if these "false positives" are exactly that or if they should be held in the -devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 20:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 16:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052002.k75K2KRT011485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-05 15:52 EST ------- There's a lot of work to be done to this package. I can review it now but I'll have lots of questions about your packaging decisions. If you have some ideas for changes now that you've had some of your other packages go through review, you can make those changes first. If you don't have ideas for changes, then I can go ahead and review and we'll start figuring out what's necessary and what's not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 20:07:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 16:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052007.k75K7VTA011612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-05 15:58 EST ------- MD5Sums: f7806d7141403b062a7353341bb393b5 python-psycopg2-2.0.2-3.src.rpm 74219613b9f5b187f4e476264e2c966c psycopg2-2.0.3.tar.gz 7d692b049a1bcbc7c884eece65f98b9f python-psycopg2.spec All previous blockers have been fixed. Here's the new problems I've found: * %define ZPsycopgDAdir /var/lib/zope/Products/ZPsycopgDA/ hard codes /var. Rather than do that you should use %{_localstatedir}. * You need to own the ZPsycoDAdir in the %files section. * Since you're listing the Zope *.pyo's separate from the other files, you should ghost them just as you've ghosted the .pyo's in the main package: %ghost %{ZPsycopgDAdir}/*.pyo * The Zope subpackage should Require: zope or %{_localstatedir}/lib/zope * Using cp -p instead of just cp when installing the zope subpackage will preserve the file timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 20:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 16:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052047.k75KlG6n012547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-05 16:38 EST ------- Please don't guess what the license of a package is. Falsely representing the license may expose you to legal liability. It will almost certainly make the package's author upset. If there is no license on the upstream distribution, then the package is not free (either free as in freedom or as in beer) but is instead a fully copyrighted work which you have no license to distribute or modify. If you think this is not what the author intended then you have to ask the author to clarify the licensing terms. The best way they can do that (from a packager's perspective) is by putting a license file into the package. In this case, the upstream author has enclosed license terms. Look inside the source code for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 20:57:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 16:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052057.k75KvtBq012743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 16:48 EST ------- rpmlint is giving in the main package E: k3d devel-dependency k3d-devel This will cause a lot of problems. How can the binary require the devel? Also has the devel-file-in-non-devel warnings The devel package contains a pile of warnings about dangling-relative-symlinks and more importantly E: k3d-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib The debuginfo package has lots of errors E k3d-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/k3d-0.5.15.0/k3dsdk/nodes.cpp (as an example) These errors are normally a permissions issue, they need to be chmod to 0644 in the after the archive has been dearchived. rpmlint reports the SRPM to be clean. I've not built it in mock yet due to these errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 21:27:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 17:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052127.k75LRu5a013380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 17:18 EST ------- rpmlint warns that there is no documentation in the devel package mock builds cleanly and rpm -qa --requires is not showing anything not caught in the mock build --- SPEC FILE --- Good Upstream version is the same, md5sums both check out No dupes in the BR No ownership problems Software actually runs Bad %{_libdir}/%{name}/lib*.la Why? There should be no .la or .a files in a package Should /sbin/ldconfig not be also executed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:11:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052211.k75MB7DY014237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 18:01 EST ------- Builds fine in mock, but on installing, gives the error error: Failed dependencies: postgresql-server is required by cyphesis-0.5.8-4.i386 rpmlint is clean on the packages (uninstalled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:12:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052212.k75MCbSS014266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 18:03 EST ------- #14 - there should be a catch incase the user is not using selinux (I had it turned off for this test) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:15:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052215.k75MFMHt014356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-05 18:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Builds fine in mock, but on installing, gives the error > > error: Failed dependencies: > postgresql-server is required by cyphesis-0.5.8-4.i386 Well sure, because it requires postgresql-server to be installed, hence the line in the spec file: Requires: postgresql-server If you install this via yum then yum would pick up this dependency and install it for you. If you install this via rpm, then you'll have to install postgresql-server yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:19:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052219.k75MJbLj014460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-05 18:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > #14 - there should be a catch incase the user is not using selinux (I had it > turned off for this test) What's this about? Are there problems building or installing on a system with SElinux disabled? I don't have any such systems myself so I'd like to know, so that I can fix the SELinux policy module packaging guidelines document. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052229.k75MTOCs014641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-05 18:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > #14 - there should be a catch incase the user is not using selinux (I had it > > turned off for this test) > > What's this about? Are there problems building or installing on a system with > SElinux disabled? > > I don't have any such systems myself so I'd like to know, so that I can fix the > SELinux policy module packaging guidelines document. I believe this comes from the stderr of the semanage commands that I use to define the port contexts for the application: /usr/sbin/semanage port -a -t %{name}_port_t -p tcp 6767 || : When the -selinux subpackage is installed on a system with selinux disabled, then semanage will spit out error messages of the sort: libsepol.context_from_record: MLS is enabled, but no MLS context found libsepol.context_from_record: could not create context structure libsepol.port_from_record: could not create port structure for range 6767:6767 (tcp) libsepol.sepol_port_modify: could not load port range 6767 - 6767 (tcp) libsemanage.dbase_policydb_modify: could not modify record value libsemanage.semanage_base_merge_components: could not merge local modifications into policy /usr/sbin/semanage: Could not add port tcp/6767 Redirecting the output of semanage to /dev/null should silence these warnings. The use of semanage isn't described in the selinux module guidelines, but perhaps it should be, with a note to redirect stderr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:32:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052232.k75MWjn1014699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 18:23 EST ------- #17 - the problem is installing with selinux disabled, but #16 has sorted this (though I'd have preferred a better system to catch it. For users not using selinux - for whatever reason - installing postgresql-server seems un-needed) One thing I can't quite see is if it is IPv6 enabled -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052241.k75MfWIV014924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-05 18:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > #17 - the problem is installing with selinux disabled, but #16 has sorted this > (though I'd have preferred a better system to catch it. For users not using > selinux - for whatever reason - installing postgresql-server seems un-needed) The need for postgresql-server is a separate issue from the semanage warnings. Regardless of whether selinux is enabled or not, postgresql-server is needed because the application stores persistent data in postgres. The semanage warnings are easily avoided by redirecting stderr from the semanage command. I'll have a new package shortly that fixes this. > One thing I can't quite see is if it is IPv6 enabled I'm not sure if it is or not. I don't recall seeing any documentation to that effect, but I wouldn't rule it out until someone has tried it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 22:48:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052248.k75Mmbxq015117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-05 18:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > When the -selinux subpackage is installed on a system with selinux disabled, > then semanage will spit out error messages of the sort: > > libsepol.context_from_record: MLS is enabled, but no MLS context found > libsepol.context_from_record: could not create context structure > libsepol.port_from_record: could not create port structure for range 6767:6767 (tcp) > libsepol.sepol_port_modify: could not load port range 6767 - 6767 (tcp) > libsemanage.dbase_policydb_modify: could not modify record value > libsemanage.semanage_base_merge_components: could not merge local modifications > into policy > /usr/sbin/semanage: Could not add port tcp/6767 > > Redirecting the output of semanage to /dev/null should silence these warnings. > > The use of semanage isn't described in the selinux module guidelines, but > perhaps it should be, with a note to redirect stderr. Perhaps that sort of thing should be on the parent page (SELinux) rather than the SELinux/PolicyModules page since it's not really specific to use with modules. The parent page will need a fair bit of editing as much of its content is now in the PolicyModules page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 23:12:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052312.k75NC23m015575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-05 19:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #18) > > When the -selinux subpackage is installed on a system with selinux disabled, > > then semanage will spit out error messages of the sort: > > > > libsepol.context_from_record: MLS is enabled, but no MLS context found > > libsepol.context_from_record: could not create context structure > > libsepol.port_from_record: could not create port structure for range 6767:6767 > (tcp) > > libsepol.sepol_port_modify: could not load port range 6767 - 6767 (tcp) > > libsemanage.dbase_policydb_modify: could not modify record value > > libsemanage.semanage_base_merge_components: could not merge local modifications > > into policy > > /usr/sbin/semanage: Could not add port tcp/6767 > > > > Redirecting the output of semanage to /dev/null should silence these warnings. > > > > The use of semanage isn't described in the selinux module guidelines, but > > perhaps it should be, with a note to redirect stderr. > > Perhaps that sort of thing should be on the parent page (SELinux) rather than > the SELinux/PolicyModules page since it's not really specific to use with > modules. The parent page will need a fair bit of editing as much of its content > is now in the PolicyModules page. Putting the use of semanage on the parent page is fine, but the PolicyModules page should probably include an example of its usage. However, using semanage in %post and %preun might not be the best place, as the port contexts won't be set if the admin starts with selinux turned off and later turns it on: (turn off selinux and reboot) # yum install cyphesis cyphesis-selinux (turn on selinux and reboot) # service cyphesis start (look in /var/log/messages: Aug 5 16:09:45 localhost kernel: audit(1154819384.688:23): avc: denied { name_bind } for pid=2420 comm="cyphesis" src=6767 scontext=user_u:system_r:cyphesis_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket # semanage port -l | grep cyphesis (no match) Maybe semanage should be called to add/remove the port contexts in the init script instead? Or should semanage be able to set such contexts even if selinux is disabled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 23:16:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] New: Review Request: genchemlab Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 Summary: Review Request: genchemlab Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/genchemlab.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/genchemlab-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: genchemlab is an OpenGL application which simulates a number of different chemistry lab practicals, but allows the user to alter the parameters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 23:26:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052326.k75NQBsO016123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 19:16 EST ------- #20 - from memory of the IRC chats, IPv6 has to be enabled for everything in FC6 (inc. FE). Could you check upstream to see if it's enabled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 23:29:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052329.k75NTDB5016256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-08-05 19:19 EST ------- I think all this is sorted. - rpmlint is quiet - updated to latest ver - docdir ownership is good Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-manual-en.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-manual-en-20060725-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 5 23:43:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608052343.k75NhtM2016709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-08-05 19:34 EST ------- MUST items: - rpmlint: Ok - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: Ok - License: Ok - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: Ok - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: Ok SHOULD: - Includes license text: Ok - Mock build: Ok - Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64 - Scriptlets: Ok - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: Just noticed the desktop entry is embedded in the spec. Putting it in a file and sourcing it would be preferable. Other than that, looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:06:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060006.k7606hSB017308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-05 19:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > #20 - from memory of the IRC chats, IPv6 has to be enabled for everything in FC6 > (inc. FE). I don't think this was the resolution: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20060713 The meeting minutes for the following two FESCo meetings did not discuss this. > Could you check upstream to see if it's enabled? Will do, and I'll test it myself once I figure out how. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:07:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060007.k7607dRD017354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-08-05 19:58 EST ------- Anything standing in the way of this being approved now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:07:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201476] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-HTTP OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP-0.36-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP.spec Description: This module provides functions that deal with the date formats used by the HTTP protocol (and then some). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:09:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201476] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060009.k76099nh017406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:13:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Mail OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail-0.30-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec Description: RFCs 2822 and 822 specify date formats to be used by email. This module parses and emits such dates. RFC2822 (April 2001) introduces a slightly different format of date than that used by RFC822 (August 1982). The main correction is that the preferred format is more limited, and thus easier to parse programmatically. Despite the ease of generating and parsing perfectly valid RFC822 and RFC2822 people still get it wrong. This module aims to correct that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060014.k760ExUE017509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:17:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201478] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201478 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-IBeat OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat-0.161-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat.spec Description: No Time Zones, No Geographical Borders How long is a Swatch .beat? In short, we have divided up the virtual and real day into 1000 beats. One Swatch beat is the equivalent of 1 minute 26.4 seconds. That means that 12 noon in the old time system is the equivalent of 500 Swatch .beats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201478] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060019.k760JT1n017648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201478 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:21:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201479] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201479 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Factory-Util OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Factory-Util-1.6-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Factory-Util.spec Description: This module exports utility functions that are useful for factory classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201479] Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060023.k760NbHX017737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201479 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Builder OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Builder-0.7807-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Builder.spec Description: DateTime::Format::Builder creates DateTime parsers. Many string formats of dates and times are simple and just require a basic regular expression to extract the relevant information. Builder provides a simple way to do this without writing reams of structural code. Builder provides a number of methods, most of which you'll never need, or at least rarely need. They're provided more for exposing of the module's innards to any subclasses, or for when you need to do something slightly beyond what is expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060027.k760RdnR017960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |201476, 201477, 201478, | |201479 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:27:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201478] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060027.k760ReN8017969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201478 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201480 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:27:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201479] Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060027.k760RpNF017995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201479 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201480 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:28:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060028.k760S2eV018015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201480 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:28:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060028.k760S7va018028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-08-05 20:18 EST ------- Hi Paul, * Your package must own %{_datadir}/%{name}. * Why do you use 'strip' in %install? Because of this the -debug rpm is empty. * There are a couple of warnings from desktop-file-install that can be easily fixed: - warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" - warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false" or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:28:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201476] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060028.k760SPGv018065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201480 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-MySQL OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL-0.04-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL.spec Description: This module understands the formats used by MySQL for its DATE, DATETIME, TIME, and TIMESTAMP data types. It can be used to parse these formats in order to create DateTime objects, and it can take a DateTime object and produce a string representing it in the MySQL format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:31:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060031.k760V9ep018204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |201480 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:31:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060031.k760VApq018212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201481 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:33:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060033.k760Xvbh018310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201482 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060041.k760frnO018536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-05 20:32 EST ------- Okay, fixed the first one. Nice and simple. The strip is there as rpmlint was moaning that the binary had not been stripped. Not sure how to fix the last two, unless it's KDE being stupid. The spec file has X-Fedora already in it. I think the second warning can be ignored. Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/genchemlab.spec has the update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 00:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060052.k760qEMC018743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-08-05 20:42 EST ------- Erk. The COPYING file is null. Thats why I didn't include it. I'll poke upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 01:08:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] New: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/openbabel.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/openbabel-2.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Open Babel is a free, open-source version of the Babel chemistry file translation program. Open Babel is a project designed to pick up where Babel left off, as a cross-platform program and library designed to interconvert between many file formats used in molecular modeling, computational chemistry, and many related areas. I couldn't figure out how to build python and perl bindings without openbabel being already installed, so if you want to test it, build it as is first, install openbabel-devel and then rebuild, uncommenting the defines at the top of the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 01:09:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060109.k7619jam019142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-08-05 21:00 EST ------- Paul, I tried removing the 'strip' line and rpmlint didn't complain about anything (I ran rpmlint both on the .rpm and installed package). This change, as expected, allowed the -debug package to be correctly created. By the way, I'm using rpmlint-0.77-1.fc6. The desktop-file-install warnings are not serious, but I don't think it'd be a lot of trouble to fix them (maybe with some sed magic). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 01:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060120.k761Kph2019339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ transport for Jabber servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pyicqt - ICQ|Review Request: pyicq-t - |transport for Jabber servers|ICQ transport for Jabber | |servers Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-08-05 21:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and built for devel, branches requested for FC-4 and FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 01:33:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060133.k761XrIb019684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-05 21:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133701) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133701&action=view) patch against conexus-0.2.2 Build failure with FC Development. Trivial patch attached. [...] In Fedora Core Development, libpcap has been split into libpcap-devel and libpcap finally. So, it must be "BuildRequires: libpcap-devel" and "Requires: libpcap-devel" in the -devel package now. [...] Errors during configure: > checking for PROJECT... yes > ./configure: line 24662: m4: command not found > ./configure: line 24662: m4: command not found Missing "BuildRequires m4"? With those easy-to-fix issues fixed: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 01:34:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060134.k761YdFN019763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 01:45:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060145.k761jbdV020162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Alias: conexusmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bugs.michael at gmx.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 03:27:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 23:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060327.k763RG4n022087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-08-05 23:17 EST ------- Given that libpulsedsp.so is a preload hack library, I don't think it should be in %{_libdir}, and thus in the default linker path. It belongs in a subdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 05:45:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 01:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060545.k765j4Qv024487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-06 01:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > #20 - from memory of the IRC chats, IPv6 has to be enabled for everything in FC6 > (inc. FE). > > Could you check upstream to see if it's enabled? The Packaging Committee made a decision that was vetoed by FESCo and FESCo hasn't clarified exactly what they would like yet. The potential plan was to enable it if it's an option. If not, add the package to a tracking bug where dwmw2 and his army of ipv6 ninjas could create a patch and also query upstream about adding support. I think the minimum time for something to come of this is a month with a good chance that it will be longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 05:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 01:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060552.k765qadT024658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-06 01:43 EST ------- Hello, (In reply to comment #18) > All previous blockers have been fixed. Here's the new problems I've found: > * %define ZPsycopgDAdir /var/lib/zope/Products/ZPsycopgDA/ hard codes /var. > Rather than do that you should use %{_localstatedir}. > * You need to own the ZPsycoDAdir in the %files section. > * Since you're listing the Zope *.pyo's separate from the other files, you > should ghost them just as you've ghosted the .pyo's in the main package: > %ghost %{ZPsycopgDAdir}/*.pyo > * The Zope subpackage should Require: zope or %{_localstatedir}/lib/zope > * Using cp -p instead of just cp when installing the zope subpackage will > preserve the file timestamps. Thanks for the review. I fixed all. New SPEC: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/psycopg2/python-psycopg2-2.0.3-3.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 06:16:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 02:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060616.k766GMeF025075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-08-06 02:06 EST ------- finally updated: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse-1.1.4-1.src.rpm http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse.spec I needed to do some tricky things because subclipse is now packaged as jar based plugins; I unpackaged the core plugin, replaced internal libraries with symlinks as previouly done, packaged core plugin classes as a jar, and added it to the plugin MANIFEST; in order to generate native gcj libraries, use the javasn and ganymed dependencies and remove external .class files. I have noticed that fewer plugins are packages as directories, is aot-compile-rpm able to compile jar files inside jar plugins? Everything was build on mock, not tested on a real FC-6 yet. The 1.0.x version is still available because version 1.1.x apparently is not compatible with eclipse 3.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 06:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 02:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201489] New: Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201489 Summary: Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cwt137 at hotmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwt137.dyndns.org/~chris/rpmbuild/SPECS/freetds.spec SRPM URL: http://cwt137.dyndns.org/~chris/rpmbuild/SRPMS/freetds-0.64-1.src.rpm Description: FreeTDS is a free re-implementation of the TDS (Tabular DataStream) protocol that is used by Sybase and Microsoft for their database products. FreeTDS is a project to document and implement the TDS (Tabular DataStream) protocol. TDS is used by Sybase and Microsoft for client to database server communications. FreeTDS includes call level interfaces for DB-Lib, CT-Lib, and ODBC. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 06:29:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 02:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201489] Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060629.k766T0J9025379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201489 cwt137 at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 07:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 03:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060712.k767C9aD026391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:02:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Starter OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-1.42-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter.spec Description: This is a CPAN module/utility to assist in the creation of new modules in a sensible and sane fashion. Unless you're interested in extending the functionality of this module, you should examine the documentation for 'module-starter', for information on how to use this tool. It is noted that there are a number of extensions to this tool, including plugins to create modules using templates as recommended by Damian Conway's "Perl Best Practices" (O'Reilly, 2005). (See also the package perl-Module-Starter-PBP for the aformentioned templates.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:04:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060804.k7684jSp029672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:06:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201492] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201492 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Starter-PBP OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP-0.000003-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP.spec Description: This module implements a simple approach to creating modules and their support files, based on the Module::Starter approach. When used as a Module::Starter plugin, this module allows you to specify a simple directory of templates which are filled in with module-specific information, and thereafter form the basis of your new module. The default templates that this module initially provides are based on the recommendations in the book "Perl Best Practices". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:06:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Starter-PBP OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP-0.000003-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP.spec Description: This module implements a simple approach to creating modules and their support files, based on the Module::Starter approach. When used as a Module::Starter plugin, this module allows you to specify a simple directory of templates which are filled in with module-specific information, and thereafter form the basis of your new module. The default templates that this module initially provides are based on the recommendations in the book "Perl Best Practices". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060807.k7687BR7029848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:07:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201492] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060807.k7687vPk029907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201492 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 03:58 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 201493 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:08:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060808.k76882HO029917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 03:58 EST ------- *** Bug 201492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060809.k7689qYc030020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |201491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060809.k7689qYD030028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201493 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:35:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] New: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Smart-Comments OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Smart-Comments-1.000002-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Smart-Comments.spec Description: Smart comments provide an easy way to insert debugging and tracking code into a program. They can report the value of a variable, track the progress of a loop, and verify that particular assertions are true. Best of all, when you're finished debugging, you don't have to remove them. Simply commenting out the use Smart::Comments line turns them back into regular comments. Leaving smart comments in your code is smart because if you needed them once, you'll almost certainly need them again later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060835.k768ZWKb015854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 08:42:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060842.k768g9CS016264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 04:32 EST ------- Update to include an explict requires on perl(Module::Starter::Simple); this requires was blocked from autodep as it was of the form "use base Module::Starter::Simple;" SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP-0.000003-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 09:12:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 05:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201489] Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060912.k769C2Oj017407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201489 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-06 05:02 EST ------- FreeTDS is not suitable for inclusion in FE due to patent issues. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00598.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-September/msg01164.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 09:32:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 05:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201489] Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608060932.k769W6cr018131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201489 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gajownik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-08-06 05:22 EST ------- Maybe this information should be added to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems page? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 10:13:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 06:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061013.k76ADoqx019499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-06 06:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/genchemlab.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/genchemlab-1.0-3.src.rpm removed the strip added a patch for the desktop file - it was easier to patch than use sed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 11:08:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 07:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061108.k76B86TQ021657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-06 06:58 EST ------- That would be nice. Unfortunately it isn't possible as we want to support multi-arch, which requires us to put it in lib[64] and let ld.so find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 11:31:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 07:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061131.k76BVCDn022404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-08-06 07:21 EST ------- Updated to 1.0.1: Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.1-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 11:40:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 07:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201479] Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061140.k76BeQjH022690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201479 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 07:31 EST ------- One remark: the changelog entry isn't formatted with a leading - * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software licence included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * md5sum match upstream 88b4471f9c22abcc1192f87be013cc18 ../RPM-fc/SOURCES/Class-Factory-Util-1.6.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Class::Factory::Util) = 1.6 * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 11:56:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 07:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201479] Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061156.k76Bu3jS023224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201479 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 07:46 EST ------- The combination of GPL and artistic in one file is dubious, since only verbatim redistribution of the GPL is allowed... This issue should be taken upstream in my opinion, but is not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:03:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201478] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061203.k76C3Lru023378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201478 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 07:54 EST ------- 2 remarks (not blockers): - Since it is a noarch package, OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" isn't needed - no need to mv LICENSE, the spec file must be in american english, not the files * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, licences included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 53e1b71382b074c85e12c6b0bf855444 DateTime-Format-IBeat-0.161.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::IBeat) = 0.161 * BuildRequires constructed according to Makefile.PL * %files section right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:42:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061242.k76CgPuC024439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 chabotc at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-06 08:33 EST ------- Finally a new version available, work and not being horribly experianced in GTK hacking made for a little slower progress. http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.src.rpm http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec Also all the current patches are available to browse at: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/ Latest changes: * Sun Aug 6 2006 Chris Chabot - 0.6.2-2.20060801cvs - Changed icon to gnome-main-menu instead of gnome-fs-client - Fixed typo in applet description - Fixed mixed spaces/tabs in spec file - Renamed applet name from "Slab Main Menu" to "Computer Menu" - Changed menu icon size to GTK_ICON_SIZE_{SMALL,LARGE}_TOOLBAR based on the current panel size, instread of GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU - made "Computer" label on the menu button optional (gconfkey location: desktop/gnome/applications/main-menu/show_menu_label) I've created a "show_menu_label" gconf key to show or hide the "Computer" label since, well i prefer it without, however since i don't want to double-guess novells usability research i did leave it on by default. The new show_menu_label key together with the (finally!) fixed icon size of the panel applet, means its now a drop in replacement for the regular gnome main menu. Also the dbus-glib-devel BR has been nuked, wasn't required in the end :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:46:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201498] New: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201498 Summary: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/xdrawchem.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/xdrawchem-1.9.9-1.src.rpm Description: XDrawChem is a two-dimensional molecule drawing program for Unix operating systems. It is similar in functionality to other molecule drawing programs such as ChemDraw (TM, CambridgeSoft). It can read and write MDL Molfiles and CML files to allow sharing between XDrawChem and other chemistry applications. Depends on openbabel, which is under review (#201485). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:47:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061247.k76ClNNf024637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-06 08:38 EST ------- Woops one change that i almost forgot to include: - Changed network control to call redhat-neat-control.desktop Its included in the patches & srpm new Still need to investigate how to make a 'suspend' button (what gnome services call to make to do such a thing), but working on it :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:47:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201498] Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061247.k76ClV67024648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201498 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |201485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:47:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061247.k76CljZm024679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201498 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:50:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177507] Review Request: pida In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061250.k76CoW3g024741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-06 08:41 EST ------- ping che -- any progress planed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:51:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061251.k76CpgTl024800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 08:42 EST ------- A blocker: - For t/pod99.t missing BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) 4 remarks: - no need to mv LICENCE LICENSE it is the spec file that must be american english - in the man page there is a reference to t/invalid and t/sample_dates, so it may be relevant to package t/ in %doc - I have the habit to add a trailing / to directories in %files for example notes could be notes/ - it may be relevant to contact the upstream about version strings, and try to convince him to have version strings in ascii ascending order (relevant for other DateTime modules) Otherwise * rpmlint warning, may be ignored W: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail strange-permission filter-requires.sh 0755 * free software, licences included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * match upstream d3940d6b387b75de0332201db1685e7d ./DateTime-Format-Mail-0.30.tar.gz * sane provides: Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Mail) = 0.30 * %files right If you fix (or explain) the BuildRequires I'll approve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:53:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061253.k76CrIZq024976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jtorresh at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:57:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061257.k76Cvecc025195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 12:59:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 08:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061259.k76CxdKV025249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-06 08:50 EST ------- Sorry, I lost track on this one. Christoph, what's the current status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 13:01:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 09:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061301.k76D1efw025338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-08-06 08:52 EST ------- I'll do a formal review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 13:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 09:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201476] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061304.k76D4sAI025395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 08:55 EST ------- Blocker: - For t/pod99.t missing BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) Remarks: - the Summary could be more precise, like HTTP protocol date conversion routines - no need to mv LICENCE LICENSE it is the spec file that must be american english Otherwise * rpmlint is silent * free software, licences included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * match upstream 8f40176f012e293743ffbdb42791e40c ./DateTime-Format-HTTP-0.36.tar.gz * sane provides: Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::HTTP) = 0.36 * %files right If you fix (or explain) the BuildRequires I'll approve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 14:00:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061400.k76E0ELK026479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 09:50 EST ------- A wrong buildrequires BuildRequires: perl(version) crept in... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 14:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061404.k76E4IPe026560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-06 09:55 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-1.4.1-8.src.rpm * Sun Aug 06 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-8 - Apply upstream 1.4.1-3 maintenance patch. * Sun Jul 23 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-7 - Apply upstream 1.4.1-2 maintenance patch. - Use VFAT compatible recording names by default. * Sun Jul 16 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-6 - Don't use %bcond_with to appease buildsys. * Sat Jul 15 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-5 - Update liemikuutio patch to 1.8. - Patch dumpability to work with PR_SET_DUMPABLE changes in recent kernels, add corresponding warning to sysconfig snippet comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 14:11:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061411.k76EBWgf026699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 10:02 EST ------- Ooops sorry perl-version is really a package !! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 14:19:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061419.k76EJOIN026844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 10:10 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 658df11ea3e1090a4c673b50860449b3 ./Smart-Comments-v1.0.2.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Smart::Comments) * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 15:39:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 11:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] New: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor.spec SRPM URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0-0.2.RC6.src.rpm Description: phpDocumentor is the current standard auto-documentation tool for the php language. phpDocumentor has support for linking between documentation, incorporating user level documents like tutorials and creation of highlighted source code with cross referencing to php general documentation. phpDocumentor uses an extensive templating system to change your source code comments into human readable, and hence useful, formats. This system allows the creation of easy to read documentation in 15 different pre-designed HTML versions, PDF format, Windows Helpfile CHM format, and in Docbook XML. Note: 1. The reason why phpdoc is a separate package is because FC6 separates php-cli (required for command-line execution) into a separate package. PhpDocumentor doesn't require the command-line utility -- it can be run from the web if configured to do so. 2. PHP Pear packaging guidelines are still only a draft, so I have used Remi Collet's existing php-pear modules currently already in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:08:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061608.k76G8EdZ029359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-06 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > Also, any custom applications added to the default list of favorite applications > is not retained on reboot. The context menu on the application browser says > "Remove from favorites" but the favorites list doesnt show the application. > Removing and readding it works. The bug was even a bit weirder then that, if you were to add one more favorite after reboot, all old fav's plus the new one would show up again Turns out on initial load, it limits the amount of 'tiles' there to 6 by default, then on drag and drop, adding or removing, etc it 'refreshes' the area, and notices it should show all the other buttons too As a temporary solution i've patched the schemas file to default to 'limit to 128 entries', this way 'hell should freeze over' (and you screen being very full) before this limit is hit, and the issue manifests its self again. Might try to come up with a 'better solution' sometime, but for now this will do i think. Uploaded the latest changes to the same place again: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.src.rpm http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:19:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061619.k76GJBD6029626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-06 12:09 EST ------- Add / remove from startup seems to suffer from the same kind of confusion. if you add a application to 'startup automaticly' the links are created propperly, and app will be started ok on login, however the label isn't updated to 'remove from startup' untill you restart the slab menu. Quite confusing for the end user, so disabled this functionality for now, but will keep it on my 'to fix somewhere in the future' list :-) Update in the usual location -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:24:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061624.k76GOYh6029750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 12:15 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:28:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061628.k76GSvG4029929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-06 12:19 EST ------- Summary: The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier (InChI^TM) library The piece in brackets should just read TM. ^TM is causing problems on my buildsys in mock For both the main and subpackage Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Needs pkgconfig as well. %files %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so Should you not be just claiming the %{name} directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:33:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201476] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061633.k76GX5Nk030025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 12:23 EST ------- Additional BuildRequires added; summary updated. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP-0.36-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:48:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061648.k76GmUoj030341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-06 12:39 EST ------- rpmlint results openbabel : clean openbabel-devel : W : no docs openbabel-debuginfo : clean inchi : clean inchi-devel : W : no docs inchi-debuginfo : not generated (should it have been?) srpm : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:48:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061648.k76Gmg6A030360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-06 12:39 EST ------- rpmlint results openbabel : clean openbabel-devel : W : no docs openbabel-debuginfo : clean inchi : clean inchi-devel : W : no docs inchi-debuginfo : not generated (should it have been?) srpm : clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 16:55:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061655.k76Gtnrw030483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 12:46 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail-0.30-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec (In reply to comment #1) > A blocker: > > - For t/pod99.t missing BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) Addressed above. > 4 remarks: > - no need to > mv LICENCE LICENSE > it is the spec file that must be american english Agreed, but easier to find this way, I think (particularly in an automated fashion). > - in the man page there is a reference to t/invalid and > t/sample_dates, so it may be relevant to package t/ in > %doc Point well taken; added to %doc > - I have the habit to add a trailing / to directories in %files > for example notes could be notes/ Appears directory ownership is maintained properly with this in %doc; changed. > - it may be relevant to contact the upstream about version > strings, and try to convince him to have version strings in ascii > ascending order (relevant for other DateTime modules) I'll drop them a note. The version being filtered here is pretty old, so it might not even be relevant in most cases anymore. > Otherwise [...snip...] > If you fix (or explain) the BuildRequires I'll approve Updated above! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 17:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061706.k76H6nGp030728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-08-06 12:57 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.9-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 17:06:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201478] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061706.k76H6o6P030740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201478 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 12:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - Since it is a noarch package, OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" isn't needed Dropped those bits post-import. +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4,FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 17:07:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061707.k76H721v030763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 Bug 201480 depends on bug 201478, which changed state. Bug 201478 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201478 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 17:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061719.k76HJhCi031019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 redhat at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |166035 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 17:23:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201479] Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061723.k76HNV1u031084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201479 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 13:14 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) (In reply to comment #2) > The combination of GPL and artistic in one file is dubious, > since only verbatim redistribution of the GPL is allowed... > This issue should be taken upstream in my opinion, but is > not a blocker. I'll send them a note; I've seen a couple modules do this now but it doesn't appear to be common practice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 17:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608061723.k76HNkdg031116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 Bug 201480 depends on bug 201479, which changed state. Bug 201479 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201479 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:25:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062025.k76KPMIe004349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-08-06 16:16 EST ------- Thanks for the review guys. Package updated with fixes from Comment #1 and Comment #2: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SPECS/tuxpuck.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SRPMS/tuxpuck-0.8.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:27:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062027.k76KRIgh004416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-06 16:18 EST ------- mock comes up clean once I change the ^TM to just TM in the spec file (this though could just be my system). Once you've addressed the other small issues in #1, I'll do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:27:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062027.k76KRT9p004431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-06 16:18 EST ------- Just checking on the status of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:32:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062032.k76KWMiC004621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 16:23 EST ------- The remaining issue is fixed, so APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:33:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062033.k76KXLFU004640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:34:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201476] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062034.k76KYUIn004720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 16:25 EST ------- The issues have been solved, so APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:39:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062039.k76KdqDn004969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-06 16:30 EST ------- Ok the biggest patch is done too, it now has a "Suspend" button in the system list, took a few hours to make that happen though :-) Result at: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.src.rpm http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec Slab suspend patch: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.suspend.patch All patches & sources at: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/ Full list of today's changes: * Sun Aug 6 2006 Chris Chabot - 0.6.2-2.20060801cvs - Changed icon to gnome-main-menu instead of gnome-fs-client - Fixed typo in applet description - Fixed mixed spaces/tabs in spec file - Renamed applet name from "Slab Main Menu" to "Computer Menu" - Changed network control to call redhat-neat-control.desktop - Changed menu icon size to GTK_ICON_SIZE_{SMALL,LARGE}_TOOLBAR based on the current panel size, instread of GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU - made "Computer" label on the menu button optional (gconfkey location: desktop/gnome/applications/main-menu/show_menu_label) - Changed itemlimit to 128 by default (was 6) - Removed add/remove from startup menu's, wasn't updating menu labels until after restart - Added "Suspend" button to System menu & actual g-p-m suspend code based on gnome-panel's implimentation Will do a final runover tomorrow or tuesday (work permitting) and might just call it 'ready for review'! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:45:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062045.k76KjueS005220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-06 16:36 EST ------- APPROVED dda9b98415609b18e331855af6cf09c7 python-psycopg2-2.0.3-3.src.rpm 74219613b9f5b187f4e476264e2c966c psycopg2-2.0.3.tar.gz 969e406141358bd286652e1a3bb858a9 python-psycopg2.spec All blockers fixed. Package builds in mock, installs and runs. rpmlint only complains about the License (GPL with exceptions) which is fine. This package is approved. Let's work on getting you approved this week so you can import this yourself. If we don't get that done, I can import the package and gateway your changes into cvs until you are sponsored but it's better if you can do that yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:52:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062052.k76Kqt67005349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-08-06 16:43 EST ------- I really would like to co-maintain hylafax together with Lee. But there are still 3 things to be done before: 1. Somebody has to review this package. As I'm not a sponsor and it's Lee's first and most likely only package, I'm not allowed to do the review. Also I don't think it's a good idea to review a package I'm planing to maintain. 2. Lee needs a sponsor. Thorsten, can you please sponsor him? I promise to keep an eye on his commits ;) 3. We need an official co-maintainership policy for extras. I know you and FESCO are working on it, but AFAIK there's nothing official yet. Please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062054.k76Ksulm005410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #127683|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 20:55:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062055.k76KtPf9005455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-06 16:46 EST ------- blocker: For the tests, needed buildrequires: Test::Pod::Coverage >= 1.04, Test::Pod >= 1.14 remark: instead of %{_bindir}/* you could have %{_bindir}/module-starter such that you notice if a new binary is distributed in later versions. Otherwise: * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, licences not included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream baf4a379d93c3a49c90a889626783d88 Module-Starter-1.42.tar.gz * sane provides perl(Module::Starter) = 1.42 perl(Module::Starter::Plugin::Template) = 0.02 perl(Module::Starter::Simple) = 1.42 * %files right I'll approve if you fix (or explain) the BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 21:34:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 17:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062134.k76LYWFT006242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-06 17:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Looking good. How do you choose which hard drive to display? It probably makes > sense to display the partition of the users home directory. (It looks like it > may be defaulting to the first ext2 partition which is my /boot partition. Or > maybe it's defaulting to that because my home dir is nfs mounted?) Ps i looked into this and it uses 'g_get_home_dir' to determine what drive to show, devhelp tells me: "Note that in contrast to traditional UNIX tools, this function prefers passwd entries over the HOME environment variable." Hope that awnsers your question -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 21:47:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 17:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062147.k76Ll3RO006600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-08-06 17:37 EST ------- Maybe that function doesn't like LVM or something because it's not working on my laptop either. My account is in the local password file and the home dir is on an lvm /home partition. I don't know if it matters or not but this is on FC5. I assume it's working fine for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 22:21:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062221.k76MLrR5007389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-06 18:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > Maybe that function doesn't like LVM or something because it's not working on my > laptop either. My account is in the local password file and the home dir is on > an lvm /home partition. I don't know if it matters or not but this is on FC5. I > assume it's working fine for you? That depends, on my home computer with dm-raid volumes, it also doesn't show the correct hd stats (ie: none), however on my laptop and work computer with normal hd setups it works fine. Maybe worth an upstream gnome bug report? I'll check and if the problem is there, file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 6 22:30:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608062230.k76MUTPP007637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-06 18:21 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clipsmm-0.0.6-1.src.rpm * Sun Aug 6 2006 Rick L Vinyard Jr - 0.0.6-1 - New release - Added m4 to BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 00:08:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201498] Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070008.k7708pp3009652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201498 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-06 19:59 EST ------- Looking at the spec file... Why not just claim %{_datadir}/xchemdraw/ and be done with it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 00:42:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070042.k770gXV5010611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-06 20:33 EST ------- Yes. And it does look like the PostScript cairo surface is no longer being built for Fedora's cairo. That doesn't have any bearing on papyrus, but it did have an impact on cairomm that at the time built the PS surfaces because they were present in Fedora's cairo. $ less /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/result/ build.log mockconfig.log papyrus-0.2.2-1.fc5.i386.rpm papyrus-0.2.2-1.fc5.src.rpm papyrus-debuginfo-0.2.2-1.fc5.i386.rpm papyrus-devel-0.2.2-1.fc5.i386.rpm root.log $ And from root.log: cairo i386 1.0.4-1 updates-released 317 k cairo-devel i386 1.0.4-1 updates-released 100 k cairomm i386 0.6.0-2.fc5 extras 36 k cairomm-devel i386 0.6.0-2.fc5 extras 175 k The 0.6.0-2 is the rebuilt cairomm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 01:23:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070123.k771Nn3R011374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 21:14 EST ------- Added additional buildrequires for tests: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-1.42-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 01:35:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201476] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070135.k771Z3sq011614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 21:25 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4,FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 01:35:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070135.k771ZRK4011652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 Bug 201480 depends on bug 201476, which changed state. Bug 201476 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201476 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 01:48:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070148.k771m3aZ011992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-06 21:38 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 01:48:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070148.k771mLjn012016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 Bug 201480 depends on bug 201477, which changed state. Bug 201477 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 03:29:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 23:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070329.k773TA6a014769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-06 23:19 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/papyrus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.2.3-1.src.rpm * Sun Aug 6 2006 Rick L Vinyard Jr - 0.2.3-1 - New release - Added m4 to BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 04:09:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 00:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177249] Review Request: jrtplib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070409.k7749lRa015770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jrtplib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177249 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-08-07 00:00 EST ------- Nearly forgot about this one... Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/jrtplib-3.6.0-1.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/jrtplib-3.6.0-1.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Aug 5 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 3.6.0-1 - Update to 3.6.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 05:48:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 01:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070548.k775msQ1017980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-07 01:39 EST ------- MUSTFIX items fixed. Please remember to bump the Release number and update the %changelog entries during the review. It makes it easier for the reviewers to track what's changed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 06:17:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 02:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070617.k776H65S018807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-07 02:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > 1. Somebody has to review this package. As I'm not a sponsor and it's Lee's > first and most likely only package, I'm not allowed to do the review. Also I > don't think it's a good idea to review a package I'm planing to maintain. > 2. Lee needs a sponsor. Thorsten, can you please sponsor him? I promise to keep > an eye on his commits ;) Can you do the review as well? Then I'll take a last quick look and sponsor him and we both keep an eye on his commits ;-) > 3. We need an official co-maintainership policy for extras. I know you and FESCO > are working on it, but AFAIK there's nothing official yet. Please correct me if > I'm wrong. Well, it's in the works but it's a huge task and even the minimal stuff (the initial CC-list from owners.list) currently doesn't work properly. But that hopefully gets fixed soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 08:36:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 04:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070836.k778awvY027034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-07 04:27 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 08:38:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 04:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070838.k778cUtb027154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 09:25:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608070925.k779PTlA030148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-07 05:16 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/openbabel.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/openbabel-2.0.2-2.src.rpm - ^TM removed - pkgconfig Req: added - simplified file lists - inchi-debuginfo isn't generated, because all the debuginfo is in openbabel-debuginfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 10:56:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 06:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071056.k77Au0ot003159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-08-07 06:46 EST ------- I usually only bump the release number when in the reviews, the update to the specfile is major and significant :) Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 11:02:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 07:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201498] Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071102.k77B2SnB003564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201498 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-07 06:53 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/xdrawchem.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/xdrawchem-1.9.9-2.src.rpm Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 11:14:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 07:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] New: Review Request: db4o Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 Summary: Review Request: db4o Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o-5.5-1.src.rpm Description: db4o is an open source object database for .NET/mono and Java (though I've only packaged the mono version!) Objects are stored natively, eliminating the added complexity and performance drain of conversion to other formats such as SQL. The native support of object-oriented database functionalities, such as db4o's acclaimed Native Queries and object-oriented replication, boost the performance and flexibility gains of object-oriented programming languages such as Java and .NET. Its is *incredibly* powerful! This software is like Qt3 in that it has a commercial and GPL version, which may cause problems for RHEL. The version here is not the stable version, but the developer version (the stable version does not compile with mono-1.1.16-1. This has been reported upstream and also to the mono developers) It also has the mono hack (though it is commented on). There is no devel package as there is no .pc file The src rpm also includes the API and tutorials. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 13:26:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201153] Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071326.k77DQofg012602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - 3D Shufflepuck Pong Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201153 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-08-07 09:17 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 14:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071430.k77EUvvo016832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-08-07 10:21 EST ------- One other thing with this new version. I use the Unofficial Tango icon set and I guess because you recently switched to using the Fedora icon instead of the Computer icon, I get two shoe prints instead of a computer icon for the applet on the panel. OK, I just looked at my "Add to Panel" dialog and it seems you're probably using the "Main Menu" icon, which when using the clearlooks icon theme is the same as the "Menu Bar" icon (fedora symbol). Under tango though, "Main Menu" is two shoe prints while "Menu Bar" is the Gnome foot. Would it be possible if not using the Computer Icon to use the Menu Bar icon? This must be one of those icon naming things that will eventually be straightened out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 14:47:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201491] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071447.k77ElUk6017999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-07 10:38 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 14:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071447.k77ElgEN018029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 Bug 201493 depends on bug 201491, which changed state. Bug 201491 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 17:07:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201588] New: Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201588 Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mbroz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cvs.devel.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/rpms/lvm2-cluster/FC-5/lvm2-cluster.spec SRPM URL: http://devserv.devel.redhat.com/~mbroz/lvm2-cluster-2.02.01-1.0.FC5.src.rpm Description: This is for the lvm2-cluster rpm for FC-5. The package is present in FC-4 (and in devel/FC-6 - review bug #191200) but got dropped from FC-5 by an oversight. If possible this package should go through update process to FC-5 too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 17:16:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071716.k77HGrQ3027731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-08-07 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Indeed, but not a tarball for libGLw, a tarball for Mesa, so it's dubious > to use the same source, Mesa-*.tar.bz2 for 2 distinct srpms. It is not > explicitly forbidden but I consider it bad practice. Maybe another reviewer > could accept that practice, or as I said above we could also ask on the > fedora-extras-list for advice. Mesa has no intention of splitting out libGLw. Mesa's packaging lacks for many things; this is one of them. Updated spec and srpm in the same place as before: Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/libGLw/libGLw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/libGLw/libGLw-1.0-1.src.rpm I think I've addressed everything by now. I hope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 17:52:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071752.k77HqnpY031996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-07 13:43 EST ------- I can review this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 18:20:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071820.k77IKaCt002713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-07 14:11 EST ------- Looks pretty good so far... offhand, 1. IMO, package should follow upstream name and version, ie, Name: mesa-libGLw Version: 6.5 that is, unless there is (strong, but so far unclear to me?) reasoning to do otherwise. If renamed, then you no longer need the Obsoletes: mesa-libGLw 2. These Obsoletes seem overkill to me: Obsoletes: Mesa Obsoletes: XFree86-libs Obsoletes: xorg-x11-libs These are (should be!) already Obsoleted elsewhere. IMO, no need to include them here. 3. -devel should Requires: libGL-devel since its headers include references to GL/gl.h GL/glx.h 4. (minor/cosmetic) in -devel, change Requires: libGLw = %{version}-%{release} to Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to save hassle if/when pkg is ever renamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 18:27:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071827.k77IRBMc003413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ajackson at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-07 14:17 EST ------- And 5. (corrolary to 2,3), since this is a pkg split, you may want to consider including in main pkg: Requires: mesa-libGL >= VER-REL and in -devel pkg Requires: mesa-libGL-devel >= VER-REL where VER-REL represent when the split occurred. This could also be accomplished with using Conflicts: mesa-libGL < VER-REL but that's potentially messier. I'll leave it up to as to how you'd rather deal with this (if at all). Address these 5 items, and we're *very* close to pkg approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 18:34:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201588] Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071834.k77IY4O5004210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201588 ------- Additional Comments From agk at redhat.com 2006-08-07 14:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133751) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133751&action=view) spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 18:35:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071835.k77IZSVi004417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-07 14:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > And > 5. (corrolary to 2,3), since this is a pkg split, you may want to consider > including in main pkg: > Requires: mesa-libGL >= VER-REL > and in -devel pkg > Requires: mesa-libGL-devel >= VER-REL This would be a fault. libGLw must not be tied to mesa-libGL. It should require libGL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 19:13:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071913.k77JDFh0010658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-07 15:03 EST ------- Got a response from upstream. They've included the license text (LGPL) inside. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libtlen.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libtlen-0-0.4.20060309.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 19:16:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201588] Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071916.k77JG6Kl011453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201588 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|188265 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-07 15:06 EST ------- I discussed with Jeremy Katz and he feels we should not introduce a "new" package to FC5 this late in the release. Fc6 is coming soon, if you have specific users that care about it, you can provide them a people page to the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 19:35:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608071935.k77JZcl2013758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-07 15:26 EST ------- Built into dist-fc6, still has a question on why not in comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 20:15:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072015.k77KF3fR018667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ajackson at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-08-07 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > This would be a fault. > > libGLw must not be tied to mesa-libGL. It should require libGL. So libGLw should conflict with earlier mesa instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 20:22:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072022.k77KMsxG019639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-07 16:13 EST ------- ajax, Either way is fine with me, but Ralf's comment has merit, so it's probably best to go the Conflicts route. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:07:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072107.k77L7FY0022860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at mharris.ca 2006-08-07 16:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Looks pretty good so far... offhand, > > 1. IMO, package should follow upstream name and version, ie, > Name: mesa-libGLw > Version: 6.5 > that is, unless there is (strong, but so far unclear to me?) reasoning to do > otherwise. > If renamed, then you no longer need the > Obsoletes: mesa-libGLw In theory, this is a good idea, as it would allow for someone to package SGI libGLw, or some other implementation that could theoretically exist, which was the intent behind existing package naming and virtual provides. I agree that the package version should probably match the Mesa version it is from also. If it is named "mesa-libGLw{,-devel}", then the Obsoletes indeed is not needed. > 2. These Obsoletes seem overkill to me: > Obsoletes: Mesa > Obsoletes: XFree86-libs > Obsoletes: xorg-x11-libs > These are (should be!) already Obsoleted elsewhere. IMO, no need to include > them here. libGLw was present in the above packages in older OS releases previously, and as such, those Obsoletes lines must remain in order for package upgrading to work properly. They should IMHO not be removed ever. > 3. -devel should > Requires: libGL-devel > since its headers include references to GL/gl.h GL/glx.h Right > 4. (minor/cosmetic) in -devel, change > Requires: libGLw = %{version}-%{release} > to > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > to save hassle if/when pkg is ever renamed. Agreed, that makes sense. (In reply to comment #14) > And > 5. (corrolary to 2,3), since this is a pkg split, you may want to consider > including in main pkg: > Requires: mesa-libGL >= VER-REL > and in -devel pkg This is bad for 2 reasons: 1) It forces libGLw to have a dependency on the mesa implementation of libGL, instead of working with _any_ libGL implementation. Whenever possible, dependencies on libGL should be generic, not implementation specific. 2) rpm automatically detects a dependency on libGL during packaging and will add a Requires: libGL.so.1 to the package, so there is no need to hard code one in the spec file. The same applies to all library packages. > Requires: mesa-libGL-devel >= VER-REL > where VER-REL represent when the split occurred. Also a bad idea. It should only contain: BuildRequires: libGL and in the libGLw-devel it should have: Requires: libGL-devel No version should be specified on either, as these virtual provides are intentionally versionless and implementation agnostic. > This could also be > accomplished with using > Conflicts: mesa-libGL < VER-REL > but that's potentially messier. I'll leave it up to as to how you'd rather > deal with this (if at all). In general "Conflicts" should always be avoided, and Obsoletes used instead, for the benefit of anaconda and yum. Obsoletes usually does the right thing without user intervention for upgrade handling case. If someone has an older version of mesa-libGLw or -devel installed, so long as all of the above Obsoletes lines I indicated should NOT be removed are present, and so long as Obsoletes: mesa-libGLw{,devel} is present (if the package remains named libGLw{,-devel}), then upgrades should always work properly without any conflicts at all. If the Obsoletes were inadvertently or intentionally missing however, rpm itself would see the file conflicts during install time and inform the user, so a hard coded Conflicts line is redundant. I'd avoid using Conflicts unless there is an actual problem it is solving which rpm does not automatically detect on it's own, or which proper Obsoletes lines do not fix. Hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:15:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201588] Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072115.k77LFQvQ023500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster - FC-5 update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201588 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-07 17:05 EST ------- clustered lvm is a basic block for cluster/gfs. Other packages that are published effectively depend on its functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:16:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072116.k77LG6BD023605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-08-07 17:06 EST ------- So, libGLw-6.5-1 should be Obsoletes: mesa-libGLw ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:17:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201636] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: thomasasta at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:18:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201637] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201637 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: thomasasta at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:19:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201638] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201638 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: thomasasta at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:22:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201638] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072122.k77LM4Q8024120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201638 thomasasta at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Instant Messenger> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:30:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072130.k77LUMl3024449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-07 17:21 EST ------- 2.0.2-2 fails to build File not found by glob : /var/tmp/openbabel-2.0.2-2-root-build/usr/lib/libinchi.so.* File not found : /var/tmp/openbabel-2.0.2-2-root-build/usr/lib/include/inchi File not found : /var/tmp/openbabel-2.0.2-2-root-build/usr/lib/libinchi.so This is outside of mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:36:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072136.k77La9tv024909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:37:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072137.k77LbgQa025093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-07 17:28 EST ------- OK, I'll review this as soon as I can figure out how to assign this bug to myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:45:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072145.k77LjTNL025381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rpm at greysector.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072151.k77LpsWF025775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From mharris at mharris.ca 2006-08-07 17:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > So, libGLw-6.5-1 should be > > Obsoletes: mesa-libGLw If the new package name stays "libGLw" and "libGLw-devel", then yeah. That ensures that the new package gets installed on upgrades - in theory - since it is in Extras now, that would only happen in reality if anaconda handles Extras during install. But it also matters for yum upgrades too, so if someone has mesa-libGLw installed in FC5 and upgrades to FC6 using yum, with the above Obsoletes, they should end up with the Fedora Extras libGLw package(s) installed and everything stays working. HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:55:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072155.k77LtojK025989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-07 17:46 EST ------- Fixed. I uncommented the defines at the top by accident. Uploaded with the same release, as there's no functional change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 21:55:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072155.k77Ltwrr026004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-07 17:46 EST ------- Spec: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d-0.5.16.0-1.src.rpm Paul, thanks for your patience and for your comments. I was able to borrow a build system and do a little more testing, and I also exchanged a few emails with upstream developers. Comments embedded below. > --mode 644 : Is this required for the desktop icon? No, about 5% of extras packages specify it explicitely. I removed it. > E: k3d devel-dependency k3d-devel Ok, I checked with upstream and the good news is that this requirement can be dropped (they updated the wiki to clarify). So this is fixed. > Also has the devel-file-in-non-devel warnings Those are false positives, as confirmed by upstream: Timothy M. Shead Wrote: "The .h files in /share/shaders are part of the shader source code, not the K-3D source code. They are there so that shaders can be compiled *at runtime* by the user's RenderMan engine. So they belong in the runtime package." > E debuginfo script-without-shellbang > /usr/src/debug/k3d-0.5.15.0/k3dsdk/nodes.cpp (as an example) Fixed. > The devel package contains a pile of warnings about > dangling-relative-symlinks Right, this occurs when a package uses library symlinks in a subdirectory of /usr/lib (those in /usr/lib are ignored by rpmlint). For example, 'graphviz' is another package that has the same problem. Anyways, this actually was an error in the spec as the run-time package requires the .so files, so I had to move them into the main package. K-3D will not load the plugins correctly if only the .so.0.0.0 files are present. There are a couple of libs in /usr/lib that also need their .so files in the main package, because they are dlopened directly by k3d-bin. I think those really belong in /usr/lib/k3d and I've reported the problem upstream, a fix would require a pretty intrusive autoconf/automake patch which i think is not worth the effort. > E: k3d-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Should no longer occur, as /usr/lib/k3d is in the main package now. Should build cleanly in mock, for devel and FC-5. FC-4 requires a small BR change, but otherwise also builds cleanly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 22:13:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072213.k77MDs7r026700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-07 18:04 EST ------- 1) undefined-non-weak-symbols ============================= rpmlint on installed packages reports undefined-non-weak-symbols, they should certainly be reported upstream: rpmlint vtk W: vtk undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libvtkMPEG2Encode.so.5.0.1 sqrt ... So it seems that there is a missing -lm for vtkmpeg2encode rpmlint vtk-python: many undefined-non-weak-symbol, maybe should be linked against a python library? 2) rpmlint on debug package =========================== There are still many rpmlint errors in debuginfo package due to bad perms. You could do something along find . \( -name \*.txt -o -name '*.[ch]' -o -name '*.[ch][px][px]' \) -print0 | xargs -0 chmod -x 3) included sources =================== Now comes the included sources issues. There are still copies of other projects codes included, that aren't solved as easily as the other that were solved above, since there doesn't seems to be support for that upstream. I checked in Utilities. Those 2 are not problematic: * Exodus2: I didn't found a clear upstream on the web, so it could be kept as is * the internal gl2ps is not used, and cannot be used for licence reasons (either vtk becomes LGPL, or proprietary...). That's not a problem, but having upstream able to link against an external gl2ps would be nice (it could be rather easily packaged for extras) gl2ps is at http://www.geuz.org/gl2ps/ Those 3 are outdated. At least it should be reported and discussed upstream: * the netcdf part is based on an netcdf library older than what is in extras * the included DICOMParser library is older that the one on http://sourceforge.net/projects/dicomparser/ * the included FTGL is older then the one on http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/henryj/code/ This one is certainly a blocker: * the code in vtkmpeg2encode for mpeg2 encoding is covered by patents, and it doesn't seems that it is possible to sold the corresponding software in the USA. If I'm not wrong, I don't see any other way to handle that issue (except from reporting upstream) than removing the offending code from the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 22:21:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072221.k77ML3K9026959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-07 18:11 EST ------- I've commented the two defines (_with_perl and _with_python) at the top but still get the same files not being packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:19:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072319.k77NJCDc029585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-07 19:09 EST ------- %defines can't be commented (rpm wart). Instead of doing #%define, do #define or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:26:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072326.k77NQAmN029738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-07 19:16 EST ------- Here's a formal review: MUST items OK: * package meets naming guidelines * source files match upstream $ md5sum db4o-5.5-mono.tar.gz 4aea1da3b96a2b92c9ac69ee2ccb9a63 db4o-5.5-mono.tar.gz * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper * rpmlint errors can be ignored $ rpmlint -i db4o-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm E: db4o no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. E: db4o only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. * final provides are sane mono(Db4oMonoTest) = 0.0.0.0 mono(Db4oTools) = 0.0.0.0 mono(db4o) = 5.5.1.0 db4o = 5.5-1 * no traditional shared libraries are present * package is not relocatable * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * %clean is present * %check is not present * no scriptlets present * code, not content * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * no headers * no pkgconfig files * no libtool .la droppings * no locales * not a GUI app * not a web app MUST items BAD: * package doesn't meet packaging guidelines - {_prefix}/%{_lib} vs. %{_libdir}, See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#head-ae42c4b5de20e082855e2f5151542730ef40f15b http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#head-932fb76878e1f34706c9962336a5f23fcc277af2 - installs shipped precompiled binaries, See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#head-1d3454f431ec1c8761eb46582e7f66bbddc1fd08 * source URL returns 404 $ wget http://www.db4o.com/community/db4o-5.5-mono.tar.gz --00:31:44-- http://www.db4o.com/community/db4o-5.5-mono.tar.gz => `db4o-5.5-mono.tar.gz' Resolving www.db4o.com... 213.203.204.172 Connecting to www.db4o.com|213.203.204.172|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 00:31:44 ERROR 404: Not Found. * final requires contain duplicates mono(Db4oTools) = 0.0.0.0 mono(System) = 1.0.5000.0 mono(db4o) = 5.5.1.0 mono(mscorlib) = 1.0.5000.0 mono-core i.e. mono(System) and mono(mscorlib) are provided by mono-core * documentation takes up 75% of the installed size, -docs subpackage is necessary SHOULD items: * License text included in package (License text not included upstream) Also, I don't like the use of sed where tr -d would suffice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:30:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] New: Review Request: gstm-1.2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm-1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Gstm, short for Gnome SSH Tunnel Manager, is a graphical front-end for managing ssh tunneled portredirects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:35:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072335.k77NZS5f030019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-07 19:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > undefined-non-weak-symbols I can't reproduce that on my builds (see http://ATrpms.net/name/vtk/ for binary builds for several platforms). What distro/arch and build tool did you use? > * the code in vtkmpeg2encode for mpeg2 encoding is covered by > patents, and it doesn't seems that it is possible to sold the > corresponding software in the USA. I'll check that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:44:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072344.k77NiCJL030331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-07 19:34 EST ------- That's why I told you to comment them with #% (hash, percent) explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:53:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072353.k77Nr6uC030636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-08-07 19:43 EST ------- So here is the latest version I prepared. I hope it includes all the points mentined above. Spec Name or Url: in the src.rpm SRPM Name or Url: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mondo-2.0.9-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A program which a Linux user can utilize to create a rescue/restore CD/tape -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:54:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072354.k77NsDBF030701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-08-07 19:44 EST ------- So here is the latest version I prepared. I hope it includes all the points mentioned above. Spec Name or Url: in the src.rpm SRPM Name or Url: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-1.0.7-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Mindi takes your kernel, modules, tools and libraries, and puts them on N bootable disks (or 1 bootable CD image). You may then boot from the disks/CD and do system maintenance - e.g. format partitions, backup/restore data, verify packages, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 7 23:58:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608072358.k77NwkSL030851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-08-07 19:49 EST ------- Oops, URL is : ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-1.0.9-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 00:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080012.k780CUuQ031159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-07 20:03 EST ------- New package online at http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/palantir-2.6-2.src.rpm (spec at original URL). All rpmlint warnings have been fixed, scripts have been updated according to hints given (in the other review requests). The mentioned problem has been fixed with an extended Makefile patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 00:26:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080026.k780QEpY031471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-07 20:16 EST ------- A new package is available at http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.2-2.src.rpm (the spec is available at http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/NetworkManager-openvpn.spec now). Cleaned up and incorporated most suggestions. Upstream: It's from the 0.6 branch (0.6.4 tag) from CVS. The more recent versions are incompatible because the VPN DBUS API has changed. There are no tarballs, source is only available in CVS, thus no URL tag for now. Four warnings remain: W: NetworkManager-openvpn no-url-tag explained above W: NetworkManager-openvpn conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/NetworkManager/VPN/nm-openvpn-service.name W: NetworkManager-openvpn conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-openvpn-service.conf These are directly relevant to a functioning service and should not be modified, thus I did not add noreplace (for if the files have to change during an upgrade). If it is policy to add noreplace anyway I can easily do this but from my understanding this is just error prone. W: NetworkManager-openvpn devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libnm-openvpn-properties.so This is needed, it contains the GUI for configuring the VPN and is called from inside NM (to be more precise: nm-vpn-properties). The find_lang has been removed for now. It should be used for i18n support but only threw errors so I commented it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 00:34:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080034.k780Yukm031741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-07 20:25 EST ------- A new package is available at http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/asuka-1.2.1-2.src.rpm (spec file at known place). I have incorporated most of the suggested changes. One problem remains to be discussed: E: asuka incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ircd W: asuka incoherent-init-script-name ircd As we see these both point to the same: name incoherency. As you can see the binary is called ircd. So it is expected to be _the_ ircd on a system. The reason for these names of the files is that the package contains the undernet irc daemon with a specific Asuka patchset from Quakenet (which assumes exclusiveness on the machine). I saw that there is an ircd-hybrid in extras. It contains the very same files (everything just named ircd). So we have two options: * it may be an option to rename the package to ircd-asuka and rename the other files (and the user) appropriately. This should make it easy to distuinguish the packages and install them side-by-side. * Another way is to make the packages conflict. This makes sense since in general you do not want two ircds on your system that you can confuse... So this decision has to be made now. I'd vote for the latter way since this is closer to what a asuka-user is known. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 01:55:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080155.k781tH3v002724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 moe at blagblagblag.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moe at blagblagblag.org ------- Additional Comments From moe at blagblagblag.org 2006-08-07 21:45 EST ------- FWIW, I was able to use this gutenprint.spec to successfully print to an HP Photosmart 7760 by using the 7550 driver. My build was against FC5. It's the first time I was able to print to it's Photo tray correctly. This is a needed improvement for gimp printing--a very nice "must have" for fc6. Total build was over 80 megs versus 25 megs for gimp-print 4.2.7. #196989 is a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 03:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080313.k783D34b006352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-07 23:03 EST ------- Thanks for testing the package. I was not knowing that gutenprint was already requested here. Updating to #196989 bug about this package link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 03:36:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080336.k783aI08007352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-08-07 23:26 EST ------- The URL tag is required... It should probably point to . It's not a link to the source. Since you are using a CVS snapshot, you should include comments on how to recreate the snapshot. Also, since this is a CVS snapshot "autogen.sh" has never been run before. This script requires gnome-common, automake, autoconf, libtool, and intltool none of which are available by default in the FE build system. So you'd either need to BuildRequire them, or run autogen.sh manually in the directory before you create the tarball. I'd go with the 2nd option... it'll keep things cleaner. Other than that it seems to build fine. Creating a VPN connection seemed worked fine (the mouse on this laptop is getting flaky so I'm sure any difficulty I had was due to that), other than the known problem with VPN connections not showing up until you restart the NetworkManager applet. However, when I actually tried to connect to the new VPN connection I made, SELinux threw a fit: kernel: audit(1155005417.964:12): avc: denied { execute } for pid=2924 comm="nm-openvpn-serv" name="openvpn" dev=dm-0 ino=758428 scontext=user_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:openvpn_exec_t:s0 tclass=file This would sometimes cause the NetworkManager daemon to crash: NetworkManager: file nm-vpn-service.c: line 459 (nm_vpn_service_stage3_connect_cb): assertion failed: (service != NULL) (BTW, I'm testing with NetworkManager 0.6.4 from FC5). For purposes of testing, I disabled SELinux for NetworkManager by changing the NetworkManager_disable_trans SELinux boolean variable. Before this package gets accepted a more permanent solution needs to be found. Once the SELinux problems were bypassed the VPN connection seemed to work fine. I couldn't check for sure because I was connecting to my home VPN server from inside my home network. Once I'm back at work tomorrow I check that out for sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 04:19:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080419.k784J36P008846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-08 00:09 EST ------- packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + Desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 7fa71b86969d8d695c3b062780a5694e gstm-1.2.tar.gz + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 04:47:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080447.k784lnmf009653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From moe at blagblagblag.org 2006-08-08 00:38 EST ------- /usr/share/gutenprint/doc should be /usr/share/doc/gutenprint, I believe. ========= from %configure using your spec: Build genppd statically: no ***WARNING: Use of --disable-static-genppd or --disable-static when building CUPS is very dangerous. The build may fail when building the PPD files, or may *SILENTLY* build incorrect PPD files or cause other problems. Please review the README and release notes carefully! ./configure --help --enable-static-genppd build a statically-linked cups-genppd and rastertogutenprint. WARNING: Please read the README and NEWS (release notes) CAREFULLY before disabling this! [(automatic)] >From NEWS, section about static: 7) Due to the implementation of CUPS, it is necessary on some systems to link the programs associated with the CUPS driver (in particular, cups-genppd and rastertogutenprint) statically against the Gutenprint library. Please see bugs 865253 and 865265 for full details. This fix works correctly unless --disable-static (to disable building static libraries) is passed on the command line. Normally, only people packaging up Gutenprint for distribution use this option. If you wish to use this option, please read item (6) in Exceptions and Workarounds *carefully* for a full description of the problem along with suggested methods of procedure. As far as I can tell, "Exceptions and Workarounds" ends at item 5. ;) In another place, which I think may be a fix for the above, is to build it, install it, and rebuild it, which mock may not be accoustomed to. I'm not sure where the built .a files should be if it's compiled without --disable-static (typically in -devel). ========= >From the README: NOTES TO PACKAGERS: * We recommend that your installation package run cups-genppdupdate.5.0 and restart CUPS as part of the installation process. CUPS is being restarted, cups-genppdupdate.5.0 isn't being run in %post ========= You may want to break out the languages into other sub-packages. /usr/share/cups/model/gutenprint/5.0 is 124 megs, but is just 7.3 megs times 17 languages. The main gutenprint package size could be greatly reduced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 05:11:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 01:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080511.k785BXDW010381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-08 01:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > /usr/share/gutenprint/doc should be /usr/share/doc/gutenprint, I believe. > I followed the way Makefile is installing those doc files here. Should i move /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to /usr/share/doc/gutenprint ? > ========= > from %configure using your spec: > Build genppd statically: no > ***WARNING: Use of --disable-static-genppd or --disable-static > when building CUPS is very dangerous. The build may > fail when building the PPD files, or may *SILENTLY* > build incorrect PPD files or cause other problems. > Please review the README and release notes carefully! > > ./configure --help > --enable-static-genppd build a statically-linked cups-genppd and > rastertogutenprint. WARNING: Please read the README > and NEWS (release notes) CAREFULLY before disabling > this! [(automatic)] > > From NEWS, section about static: > 7) Due to the implementation of CUPS, it is necessary on some > systems to link the programs associated with the CUPS driver (in > particular, cups-genppd and rastertogutenprint) statically > against the Gutenprint library. Please see bugs 865253 and > 865265 for full details. > > This fix works correctly unless --disable-static (to disable > building static libraries) is passed on the command line. > Normally, only people packaging up Gutenprint for distribution > use this option. If you wish to use this option, please read > item (6) in Exceptions and Workarounds *carefully* for a full > description of the problem along with suggested methods of > procedure. > > As far as I can tell, "Exceptions and Workarounds" ends at item 5. ;) In > another place, which I think may be a fix for the above, is to build it, install > it, and rebuild it, which mock may not be accoustomed to. I'm not sure where the > built .a files should be if it's compiled without --disable-static (typically in > -devel). Will check that > > ========= > From the README: > NOTES TO PACKAGERS: > > * We recommend that your installation package run > cups-genppdupdate.5.0 and restart CUPS as part of the > installation process. > > CUPS is being restarted, cups-genppdupdate.5.0 isn't being run in %post I modififed SPEC file to run cups-genppdupdate.5.0 in %post > ========= > You may want to break out the languages into other sub-packages. > /usr/share/cups/model/gutenprint/5.0 is 124 megs, but is just 7.3 megs times 17 > languages. The main gutenprint package size could be greatly reduced. Will do that and then post updated package link. But how can i handle this? I mean how can i make separate packages for all languages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 05:29:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 01:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080529.k785TX2x010878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From moe at blagblagblag.org 2006-08-08 01:20 EST ------- > Will do that and then post updated package link. But how can i handle this? I > mean how can i make separate packages for all languages? I'm just getting familiar with the package, but it appears that those ppd's and a few other bits may(?) be moved to gutenprint-cups (to "%files cups" section instead of "%files"): %{_sbindir}/cups-genppd* %{_mandir}/man8/cups-calibrate.8*, %{_mandir}/man8/cups-genppd*.8* %{_datadir}/cups/model/gutenprint/ I don't know the best way to make the package for multiple languages. Perhaps see the openoffice.org spec. Or you could just do an -i18n- package. ======== BTW, gimp 2.4 looks like it will be swtiching to gtk's printing module and not using gutenprint. Gimp 2.4 won't be out for fc6 (i'm guessing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 07:17:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 03:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080717.k787HIWj014239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-08 03:07 EST ------- E: db4o no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. I'll change that. E: db4o only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Mono packages aren't sane when it comes to this and until mono is fixed, this one can be ignored * documentation takes up 75% of the installed size, -docs subpackage is necessary Not a problem - I did that with XaraLX i.e. mono(System) and mono(mscorlib) are provided by mono-core * documentation takes up 75% of the installed size, -docs subpackage is necessary It needs mono-core as a R and mono-devel as a BR. * package doesn't meet packaging guidelines - {_prefix}/%{_lib} vs. %{_libdir}, See Permitted for the time being - have a look at the mono packaging guidelines * Also, I don't like the use of sed where tr -d would suffice. I'm not sure that's a blocker though I'll fix the docs and noarch and upload a new spec file. Thanks for the review up to now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 07:36:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 03:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080736.k787av23015803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-08 03:27 EST ------- Regarding movong docs from /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to /usr/share/doc/gutenprint, I'd only attempt that if there's a configure option for doing ot; otherwise you may find that any built-in documentation references in the software may point to the wrong place. Regarding --disable-static: this needs to be looked at carefully; building, installing, and rebuilding is a non-starter as far as packaging is concerned. Regarding splitting off separate packages for each language: take at look at how it's done in gcompris: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gcompris/gcompris.spec?root=extras&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 07:58:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 03:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080758.k787wvkZ017723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-08 03:49 EST ------- I don't know which mono packaging guidelines you've been reading, but those I pointed you to (from the Mono SIG page) say to use %{_libdir} and nothing else. They also say those rpmlint errors are to be ignored, so I don't understand why you want to make it a noarch package. Mono packages aren't supposed to be noarch, according to those guidelines. I've already said that. About Requires: mono-core - it's not necessary, as I've already said. Please read what I have written. Using sed instead of my preferred tr -d isn't a blocker, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 08:23:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080823.k788NAtG019771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-08 04:13 EST ------- "I don't know which mono packaging guidelines you've been reading, but those I pointed you to (from the Mono SIG page) say to use %{_libdir} and nothing else." See what happens when you build on x86_64 and you'll see why %{_prefix}/lib is permissable. Until such time that mono is fixed (that is, on x86 builds to /usr/lib and x86_64 builds to /usr/lib64) either upstream or for FC, the only 100% guaranteed method for others to be able to pick it up is to statically define where things go. This has been accepted in the short term (have a look at every other mono package registered to me and you'll see exactly the same hack is applied) "They also say those rpmlint errors are to be ignored, so I don't understand why you want to make it a noarch package. Mono packages aren't supposed to be noarch, according to those guidelines. I've already said that." Normally on a mono package, the executable is in /usr/lib/ with a symlink back to %{_bindir} and so rpmlint moans. What has happened here is I was in a rush to get out to get to work and have misread what you've said. Requires : mono-core, point taken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 08:36:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080836.k788a9Kw020719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-08 04:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o.spec Addresses #2 Not uploaded a new src.rpm - there is no difference other than the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 08:43:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] New: Review Request: codeblocks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 Summary: Review Request: codeblocks Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.1.2824svn.src.rpm Description: Code::Blocks is a free C++ IDE built specifically to meet the most demanding needs of its users. It was designed, right from the start, to be extensible and configurable. Built around a plugin framework, Code::Blocks can be extended with plugin libs. It includes a plugin wizard, so you can compile your own plugins. Notes: - rpmlint output is clean, there are only false positives (about no doc in subpackages and *.c and *.h files in main package, but they are used as templates for new projects) - there is a patch (codeblocks-plugins.patch) to install plugins not under /usr/share/codeblocks but in /usr/lib/codeblocks - a hack to disarm the rpath is applied as patch (codeblocks-rpath.patch) after running autotools - builds in devel on i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 08:57:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080857.k788v8Q9022075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-08 04:47 EST ------- Thanks Paul for your comments. I will prefer not to move docs from /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to /usr/share/doc/gutenprint. I will check gcompris SPEC and do same for this package. For --disable-static i will really need suggestions whether i should remove it from passing a option to %configure or keep it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 09:00:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080900.k7890kis022255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 markmc at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From markmc at redhat.com 2006-08-08 04:51 EST ------- Closing this as deferred for now - the device-mapper changes didn't make it into the kernel in time for feature freeze Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 09:05:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080905.k7895vPQ022649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 09:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080912.k789C85N023037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 05:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I can't reproduce that on my builds (see http://ATrpms.net/name/vtk/ for binary > builds for several platforms). What distro/arch and build tool did you use? I have the same rpmlint error with http://dl.atrpms.net/all/vtk-5.0.1-10.fc5.90.at.i386.rpm I'm on rawhide rpmlint-0.77-1.fc6 it only shows up when running rpmlint against the installed rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 09:15:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200551] Review Request: cachefilesd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080915.k789Fm58023320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cachefilesd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200551 ------- Additional Comments From dhowells at redhat.com 2006-08-08 05:06 EST ------- > I'm a bit confused, if its not a Requires of something, nor in Comps > anyplace, how will a user actually install it? That means we need to update the installer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 09:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080923.k789Nbrn023803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-08-08 05:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > I will prefer not to move docs from /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to > /usr/share/doc/gutenprint. Hmmm, we don't seem to have anything in the guidelines for this AFAICS. But IMHO all docs should be marked as %doc and thus should land in /usr/share/doc/ (the proper place used by all other packages) Maybe we need to add such a rule :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 09:31:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080931.k789VXEc024190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-08 05:22 EST ------- The question is: are these files docs or are they data? I don't know in this specific instance because I don't know the package, but many apps with GUI front ends have built-in ways to access their docs, which are expected to be in the place they're configured with. Marking them as %doc and/or moving them elsewhere could cause this built-in means of accessing the docs to fail, which would violate the rule: MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 09:47:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608080947.k789lf8F024956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-08 05:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > I will prefer not to move docs from /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to > > /usr/share/doc/gutenprint. > > Hmmm, we don't seem to have anything in the guidelines for this AFAICS. But IMHO > all docs should be marked as %doc and thus should land in > /usr/share/doc/ (the proper place used by all other > packages) > > Maybe we need to add such a rule :-/ Sure if you think like that. Primary looking at package said me that let that doc files be in /usr/share/gutenprint/doc Then i check under /usr/share on my system using find . -name doc * and i got following output ./sane/xsane/doc ./cups/doc ./apps/quanta/doc ./sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets-1.69.1-5/htmlhelp/doc ./scrollkeeper/doc ./vim/vim70/doc ./eclipse/plugins/org.python.pydev_0.9.3/PySrc/ThirdParty/logilab/common/doc ./eclipse/plugins/org.python.pydev_0.9.3/PySrc/ThirdParty/logilab/pylint/doc ./pear/doc ./gutenprint/doc where some of the entries belongs to Fedora Core packages. So it looks to me that either we have different strategy for Fedora Extras or we have some Guidelines that will require a major changes when a package moves from Fedora Extras to Fedora Core. Then i would like to see that Guidelines page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 10:00:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081000.k78A05sT025501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 05:50 EST ------- Also the .so associated with Python and Tcl may not be necessary if no program should link against those libraries. This way it may become possible to remove the dependency of the devel package on the python and tcl subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 10:01:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081001.k78A1JLc025603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From moe at blagblagblag.org 2006-08-08 05:51 EST ------- The files in /usr/share/gutenprint/doc appear to me to be %doc and won't affect runtime. The reference-html subdir should be in gutenprint-devel, as it's titled "The Developer's Guide to Gutenprint". Same with gutenprint.pdf. Using gutenprint in gimp 2.2.12 has an "About" button, but no "Help" button (with the docs in /usr/share/gutenprint/doc). gutenprint-users-manual.odt (OpenDocument Text) and gutenprint-users-manual.pdf should be in the main package's %doc, AFAICT. Parag, I'm not certain about --disable-static, but this package sure seems to warn against it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 10:03:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081003.k78A3Gsi025754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-08 05:53 EST ------- Some days ago my rpmlint on FC5 even refused to recognize the objformat in FC6 and I have seen similar reports in bugzilla. Now it will pass the FC6 packages with the same output like the FC5 packages. Maybe this is an rpmlint false alarm? rpmlint-0.77-1.fc5 at x86_64 doesn't show any undefined weak symbols, neither on FC5 builds, not FC6. > it only shows up when running rpmlint against the installed rpm. OK, I can't test that at the moment only external rpmlint application is possible for me. But that sounds like an rpmlint bug the more. The output should be the same whether applied on an external package or on an installed one. Did you invoke an example on rawhide? Did the executable puke on missing sqrt? That would display whether the rpmlint error is flase or not. It looks strange, but for the pupose of the review I wouldn't invest more time into understanding latest rawhide and rpmlint changes. FWIW I'm rebuilding all of ATrpms with a disttag of fc5.91 for test2. Maybe it makes a difference, let's see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 10:27:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081027.k78ARnnE026944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 06:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > OK, I can't test that at the moment only external rpmlint application is > possible for me. It is not a blocker, it is just an information that something could be ameliorated upstream (and there may be portability issues, but that's not our problem). > But that sounds like an rpmlint bug the more. The output should be the same > whether applied on an external package or on an installed one. No, it can't. Basically rpmlint invokes "ldd -d -r" on libs. > Did you invoke an example on rawhide? Did the executable puke on missing sqrt? > That would display whether the rpmlint error is flase or not. If I recall well, on fedora the weak symbols don't break executables, but prelinking is less efficient. > It looks strange, but for the pupose of the review I wouldn't invest more time > into understanding latest rawhide and rpmlint changes. FWIW I'm rebuilding all > of ATrpms with a disttag of fc5.91 for test2. Maybe it makes a difference, let's > see. I guess it won't, but as I said above it is just a remark. Ville explains all that here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00569.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 10:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081043.k78AhqJa028260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-08 06:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133778) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133778&action=view) SELinux policy modules for NetworkManager-openvpn Please try the attached SELinux policy modules (myNetworkManager and myopenvpn), which should allow NetworkManager to run openvpn under SELinux. For details of how to build modules: http://www.city-fan.org/tips/BuildSeLinuxPolicyModules To install the modules once built: # semodule -i myNetworkManager.pp -i myopenvpn.pp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:18:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178003] Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081118.k78BIxfv030445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178003 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:21:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177860] Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081121.k78BL5N4030581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177860 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 07:11 EST ------- I agree that there isn't much point in getting that package in extras, as you also agree, could you please close the bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:25:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081125.k78BPPPd030867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-08 07:16 EST ------- Ok, upon further reading I see that you're right about %{_libdir}, though the guidelines say it is a temporary solution. However, you still haven't addressed my concerns about installing a precompiled binary. In particular, /usr/lib/mono/gac/db4o/*/db4o.dll (installed) is binary identical to db4o-5.5/dll/db4o.dll (shipped). The guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#head-1d3454f431ec1c8761eb46582e7f66bbddc1fd08 say explicitly that "All packages must build from source". And I'd like you to name the docs package db4o-doc, not db4o-docs, as this naming seems to be more common among extras packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:40:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081140.k78BeJKa031926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-08 07:31 EST ------- This package is built from the source. It's simple enough to fix this problem, just %exclude it. That said, I have unearthed a slightly more sinister problem... Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o.spec Fixes the problems in #7 though -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:41:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081141.k78BfmHu032026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-08 07:32 EST ------- Thanks for the pointer, now I understand the issue a bit better and it's reproducable even on FC5, so nothing is rawhide-relavant. Since it only occurs in a part that is anyway under investigation of being cropped I'll defer that until it's clear what happens to vtkmpeg2encode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:48:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081148.k78Bmsut032713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 07:39 EST ------- I sent a mail to the debian gdal maintainers about the licensing issue and put all of you who appear in the report as blind carbon copies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:50:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081150.k78Boqs5000347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-08 07:41 EST ------- *ping* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:51:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182440] Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081151.k78BproJ000458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - High-performance Fast CGI engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182440 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 11:56:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081156.k78Buukr000765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-08 07:47 EST ------- *ping* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 12:17:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081217.k78CHO1a001676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-08 08:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o-5.5-5.src.rpm I've removed the gacutil from the package as it's broken and added a devel (with .pc file) This now means that mcs foo.cs -pkg:db4o can now be used in much the same way as gtk-sharp needs to be used The tarball includes the .pc file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 12:19:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081219.k78CJrIW001725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 08:10 EST ------- For tests, missing BR: perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::More) maybe perl(DTFB::OnFailTest) perl(DTFB::Quick) maybe Params::Validate => 0.72 since it is in Build.PL, but is it required for build? I guess so for tests? README and LICENCE missing from %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 13:08:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081308.k78D8rO7004241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-08 08:59 EST ------- Comment from original author of postgresql_autodoc: "I would like to know what text in the license made you, or Red Hat's lawyers, think it was restricted so that I can change it suitably." So? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 13:33:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081333.k78DX81K005614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-08 09:23 EST ------- ok I have updated package Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.7.fc5.src.rpm I need review for this package. I have not donr any work on --disable-static issue as i need suggestions on that issue. * Wed Aug 09 2006 Parag Nemade - 5.0.0-0.7 - Moved /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to %doc of main rpm and devel rpm - Additionally added API documents for gutenprint and gutenprintui2 * Tue Aug 08 2006 Parag Nemade - 5.0.0-0.6 - Added cups-genppdupdate.5.0 at post section - Splitted gutenprint main rpm for separate languages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:23:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178003] Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081423.k78EN0ZM009054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178003 ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net 2006-08-08 10:13 EST ------- I'm sorry to say that but I'll close this package for now. (I hope I could re-add it later, but I have no time to rewrite it now) Thank you for your patience for reviewing it so long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:26:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081426.k78EQGjU009228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:16 EST ------- Missing BuildRequires for perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:30:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201637] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081430.k78EUOXt009518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201637 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Instant Messenger> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:21 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 201636 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:30:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201638] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081430.k78EUJHI009505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201638 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:20 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 201636 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:30:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081430.k78EURim009532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:21 EST ------- *** Bug 201637 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:30:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081430.k78EUfuC009560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:21 EST ------- *** Bug 201638 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:34:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081434.k78EYCd8009750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Instant Messenger> ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:24 EST ------- Please put an url to your spec file in Spec URL: and an url to the srpm file in SRPM URL: and also provide a description (in general the same than what appears in %description in the spec file). The enclosing <> are not needed. If you are unsure, look at other reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:39:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193380] Review Request: hardinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081439.k78EdCfk010210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193380 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:43:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081443.k78Eh0SD010497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From thomasasta at gmx.net 2006-08-08 10:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://cspace.in - Windows Homepage Spec URL: http://www.aabdalla.com/cspace/ - Linux SRPM URL:http://www.aabdalla.com/cspace/releases/cspace-0.1.24-r0.i386.rpm Description: CSpace - Secure, decentralized Peer-to-Peer Instant Messenger -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:45:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081445.k78Ej62G010623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Instant Messenger CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-08-08 10:35 EST ------- thommi: As far as I can tell, that Spec URL contains no actual .spec file for the RPM, and the SRPM link points to a binary RPM. Please ensure that you link us to a full .spec file and a source RPM instead. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081448.k78EmpkJ010946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:39 EST ------- The debian maintainer response: This is relevant. I would move those data into a non-free package a part. That would involve re-packaging the upstream tarball, of course. Maybe the best thing to do at that point would be to contact the upstream and ask them to precise their licence. Otherwise some split should be needed. (isn't there a bug to block in such cases, like FE-LEGAL?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:55:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185776] Review Request: gitweb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081455.k78EtQAH011358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gitweb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185776 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:56:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081456.k78EuKpi011463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-08-08 10:46 EST ------- I'm just back from a few weeks of vacation, and I'm sorry about my slow response to this issue. I'm a bit uncertain if the tag generated by 'make tag' is correct (vorbisgain-0_34-1_fc6). However the package is built by the plague build system (as job id 13875) and is in status needsign at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:56:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185845] Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081456.k78Eurdm011493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185845 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 14:58:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187325] Review Request: jaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081458.k78EwCF1011576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187325 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:03:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081503.k78F3YAC011898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 10:54 EST ------- Found it, it isn't FE-LEGAL but FE-Legal.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:05:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081505.k78F5Mju012159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-08 10:55 EST ------- perl(Test::More) is a core module, but easy enough to include. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP-0.000003-3.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-Starter-PBP.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:05:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081505.k78F5XKW012204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-08 10:56 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, been swamped with work... Finally poked at the -3 version a bit, and got the following out of rpmlint: $ rpmlint -i /build/RPMS/noarch/luma-2.3-3.fc5.noarch.rpm E: luma only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. This would appear to require some hacking of install.py, and I'm actually wondering if maybe these bits should go in /usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages/luma/ instead of /usr/lib/luma, /usr/share/luma/ or /usr/share/luma/lib. But python packaging definitely isn't my area of expertise, so that could be a bad idea. :) rpmlint seems to think somewhere under /usr/share is the place to put things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:17:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081517.k78FHc3W013091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 11:08 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, licences not included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 2e39d69cd77f64721a875d903a632be3 Module-Starter-PBP-v0.0.3.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Module::Starter::PBP) * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081519.k78FJeZ2013310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 11:10 EST ------- If I'm not wrong this bug should block FE-REVIEW and be in ASSIGNED state... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187613] Review Request: sm_tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081522.k78FMX3e013665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sm_tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187613 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:28:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081528.k78FSkA4014015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-08 11:19 EST ------- BR's and %doc updated; perl(DTFB::*) are actually packages defined in and as part of the test suites, so they were not included. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Builder-0.7807-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DateTime-Format-Builder.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 15:58:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] New: Review Request: MemProf Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 Summary: Review Request: MemProf Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: sandmann at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/memprof.spec SRPM URL: http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/memprof.srpm Description: Memprof is a tool for profiling memory usage and detecting memory leaks. It can be used with existing binaries without need for recompilation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 16:01:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] Review Request: MemProf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081601.k78G1Tm3016293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MemProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2006-08-08 11:52 EST ------- Note that memprof used to be in Fedora, but was removed from FC-4 since it didn't work. It has now started working again though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 16:03:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081603.k78G37N8016376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 maestronn at wowway.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maestronn at wowway.com ------- Additional Comments From maestronn at wowway.com 2006-08-08 11:53 EST ------- The klash plugin fail to build on x86_64 arch using uptodate rawhide. Are there additional build-requirements? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 16:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] Review Request: MemProf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081608.k78G83Bf016595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MemProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2006-08-08 11:58 EST ------- Corrected URLs: Spec URL: http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/memprof.spec SRPM URL: http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/memprof-0.6-1.src.rpm I don't feel very strongly about this package, so if it is going to be a huge hassle getting this back in, maybe it's not worth it ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 16:11:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178003] Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081611.k78GBTva016739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178003 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 16:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178003] Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081612.k78GCVSn016847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lambda-jp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178003 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 16:36:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081636.k78GaMuk018280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-08 12:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.32.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Aug 8 2006 Alain Portal 2.32.0-1 - Update to 2.32.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 16:37:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081637.k78GbZSM018399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 12:28 EST ------- Make that review block FE-DEADREVIEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 17:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185845] Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081701.k78H1M5O019788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185845 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-08-08 12:52 EST ------- Sorry for delay, work :( http://stingr.net/l/fe/rpld-1.8-2.src.rpm and http://stingr.net/l/fe/rpld.spec have been updated accorting to your corrections. Please take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 18:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081850.k78IoZAV027149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-08 14:41 EST ------- I'm confused. Does the original author think the license is GPL? If so, the license at the top of postgresql_autodoc.pl needs to be changed to GPL. If the author is asking what is "restricted" about his license, then the answer is _nothing_. (Well, it's original BSD instead of new BSD. But that just makes it incompatible with the GPL; it's still open source.) The problem I'm mentioning in Comment #2 is that the License in your spec file says GPL which is contrary to the license in the source. So you are misrepresenting the license that the author has chosen for his work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 18:58:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081858.k78IwBPI027715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual Alias: php-manual-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |php-manual-en -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 19:01:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081901.k78J1eaD028087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-08 14:52 EST ------- Thank you for your report. I have tried to solve the reported issues. aplus-fsf-4.20-6 should be available on the mirrors in the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 19:14:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081914.k78JE0RY029303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-08 15:04 EST ------- I know this error message from rpmlint. But becouse other packages like yum does it in the same way. I decide not to change the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 19:19:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081919.k78JJuH6029920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 15:10 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, licences included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 4f6ee670cab944db0492e70ca8df3be3 ./DateTime-Format-Builder-0.7807.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Builder) = 0.7807 perl(DateTime::Format::Builder::Parser) = 0.77 perl(DateTime::Format::Builder::Parser::Dispatch) = 0.78 perl(DateTime::Format::Builder::Parser::Quick) = 0.77 perl(DateTime::Format::Builder::Parser::Regex) = 0.77 perl(DateTime::Format::Builder::Parser::Strptime) = 0.77 perl(DateTime::Format::Builder::Parser::generic) = 0.77 * %files section right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 19:25:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608081925.k78JPgnC030436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-08 15:16 EST ------- You could add a comment to mv LICENCE LICENSE And perl -pi -e 's/E/(C)/' `find lib/ -type f` could be more classically something along find lib/ -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/E/(C)/' {} \; but it is a perl module, so there is more than one way to do it ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:01:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177860] Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082001.k78K1rd3000906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177860 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:04:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177860] Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082004.k78K4keF001034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177860 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-08 15:55 EST ------- Done. I also removed it from FE-NEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] New: Review Request: xfsdump Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 Summary: Review Request: xfsdump Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cattelan at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://xfs.org/~cattelan/xfsdump.spec SRPM URL: http://xfs.org/~cattelan/xfsdump-2.2.38-1.src.rpm Description: package for xfs dump/restore xfs_copy xfs_defrag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:05:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082005.k78K5iMY001264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-08 15:56 EST ------- Yes. Jima said on IRC that he'll do it shortly, no worries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201493] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082009.k78K9qv4001531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-PBP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201493 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-08 16:00 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082022.k78KM1JB002042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-08 16:12 EST ------- > Can we do away with the FC 4 support? Personally? No, I intend to be able to (continue to) (re)build these on/for rhel4 as well. The ancient/legacy bits (like rh7 references) can certainly go. > fails in mock devel because its looking for libmeanwhile0-devel, but FC uses > meanwhile-devel Yeah, it needs libmeanwhile-0.4, which is API-incompatible with newer releases (and kopete doesn't yet support the newer API). I'll conditionalize out the meanwhile support for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:27:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082027.k78KRDsh002332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-08 16:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdenetwork.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/kdenetwork-3.5.4-3.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Aug 08 2006 Rex Dieter 7:3.5.4-3 - BR: gettext - don't --enable-sametime-plugin, libmeanwhile0 is not (yet) available. - drop legacy (rh7) bit(s). * Mon Jul 31 2006 Rex Dieter 7:3.5.4-2 - kopete patch "can't connect to IRC" (kde bug #131598) * Tue Jul 25 2006 Rex Dieter 7:3.5.4-1 - kde-3.5.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 20:31:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082031.k78KVgmu002543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-08 16:22 EST ------- updated URL: SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/kdeutils-3.5.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 21:27:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082127.k78LRCVb005293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-08 17:17 EST ------- Just because another package doesn't do the right thing doesn't make it okay (and the bulk of yum is in /usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages/yum/, only yum-plugins are in /usr/lib/ directly). I'll continue poking at the package for other feedback, but the way I'm leaning is the same as the advice I've gotten from other more experienced reviewers -- that this is a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 21:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082129.k78LTOS7005407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-08 17:20 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql_autodoc/postgresql_autodoc.spec New srpm: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql_autodoc/postgresql_autodoc-1.25-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 21:42:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082142.k78LgfxT006101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-08 17:33 EST ------- Looks almost perfect, except for these new rpmlint warnings: W: db4o-devel no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. It can be ignored. W: db4o-doc non-standard-group Development/Documentation The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: [...]"Documentation"[...] I think you should call it just that. :) Oh, and you can also add %define debug_package %{nil} so that the empty debug package isn't generated. Something like that is found in other mono packages, too, and follows the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo#head-29573c4f61c3a4698b2d07c7e73cfa194785f257 Running the built Db4oMonoTest.exe seems fine, too. Fix the group tag, disable debuginfo generation, and it's APPROVED. Good work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 22:16:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082216.k78MGf3n007671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-08 18:07 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching +Close bug Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #4) > perl -pi -e 's/E/(C)/' `find lib/ -type f` > could be more classically something along > find lib/ -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/E/(C)/' {} \; > but it is a perl module, so there is more than one way > to do it ;-) TMTOWTDI, even outside perl :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 22:16:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082216.k78MGv6e007700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 Bug 201481 depends on bug 201480, which changed state. Bug 201480 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 22:24:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082224.k78MO6SN007954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-08 18:14 EST ------- Any reason this hasn't been built yet? I see that it's in CVS and has branched for FC-5, but I don't see any packages in the repository and of course this bug hasn't been closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 22:29:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] New: Review Request: mbuffer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 Summary: Review Request: mbuffer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ad+rh-bugzilla at uni-x.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.uni-x.org/review/mbuffer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.uni-x.org/review/mbuffer-20060728-1.src.rpm Description: mbuffer is a tool for buffering data streams. Its special feature is to show the I/O rate and summary to the user. Comment: The package had already been under review, in "pre-bugzilla_review" times. But for some reasons I never committed it into CVS. So I feel it is better to again offer a review. Reference for previous review: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-August/msg00046.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-August/msg00152.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 23:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608082307.k78N76w9009631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-08 18:57 EST ------- That looks significantly better; the compiler is called properly and the debuginfo package includes the source. It looks like the directory ownership problem is being fixed in the core ruby-libs package as well, so I think things are ready to go. The only issue is whether ruby-libs will be fixed for FC5 and if not how you deal with that. I'll leave it to you since everything is fine on FC6. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 8 23:23:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201808] New: request for package in extras: aria2 (command line BitTorrent client) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201808 Summary: request for package in extras: aria2 (command line BitTorrent client) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: anthonybryan at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060808 BonEcho/2.0b1 Description of problem: This is a request that you will include aria2 (http://aria2.sourceforge.net/) RPMs in Fedora Extras. aria2 is a command line download utility that supports BitTorrent. It's like the aria2 download manager but light weight and no GUI. I've been using this .spec file to package it, but I don't really know what I'm doing. %define ver 0.7.0 %define rel 1.FC6 %define prefix /usr Name : aria2 Version : %{ver} Source : aria2-%{ver}.tar.bz2 Release : %{rel} Group : Productivity/Networking License : GPL Packager : Anthony Bryan URL : http://aria2.sourceforge.net/ Summary : aria2 is a download utility with BitTorrent and Metalink support. BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-buildroot BuildRequires: openssl-devel libxml2-devel %description aria2 is a download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. Supported protocols are HTTP/HTTPS/FTP/BitTorrent/Metalink. %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %setup %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --prefix=%{prefix} %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} %install [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) %doc ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README AUTHORS TODO #%{_libdir}/*.so.* #%doc doc/API.html doc/DOCUMENTATION doc/README.html %{_bindir}/* #%{_includedir}/libetpan/ #%{_includedir}/libetpan.h #%exclude %{_libdir}/*.a #%exclude %{_libdir}/*.la #%{_libdir}/*.so /usr/share/locale/* %changelog * Tue Aug 8 2006 Anthony Bryan - Update to version 0.7.0 * Fri Jul 28 2006 Anthony Bryan - Update to version 0.6.0+1 and FC6 * Mon Jun 5 2006 Malcolm A Hussain-Gambles - First release of this package by me Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. No packages included Actual Results: Expected Results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 00:35:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090035.k790ZSAT012000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-08 20:26 EST ------- OK folks, this builds but installation is a bit odd: GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 dirname: missing operand Try `dirname --help' for more information. mkdir: missing operand Try `mkdir --help' for more information. GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db: line 17: 4325 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool -n $dbLocation 64 GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 xargs: /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool: terminated by signal 11 GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 Any idea what this is about? It's an install in a mock chroot, so perhaps there's some weirdness due to that, but I doubt it's reasonable for things to segfault. rpmlint has some complaints: On the srpm: W: eclipse-subclipse mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Some lines are indented with tabs, some with spaces, and some of the Requires: and BuildRequires: lines have both. W: eclipse-subclipse patch-not-applied Patch10: eclipse-subclipse-1.1.4-plugin-classpath.patch Not sure what's up here; perhaps a comment as to why this isn't applied would help. On the binary rpm: W: eclipse-subclipse non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) I don't think there's any concensus as to what to do with groups at this point; following Eclipse is probably best. W: eclipse-subclipse invalid-license EPL Seems OK as that's what Eclipse uses. W: eclipse-subclipse no-documentation Indeed, there's nothing marked as %doc. Is there anything that should be so marked? There are license files as plain text and HTML changelog files and such, which seems like they qualify. W: eclipse-subclipse dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.core_1.1.4/lib/javasvn.jar /usr/share/java/javasvn.jar This is OK; it's a symlink to a dependency. W: eclipse-subclipse symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.core_1.1.4/lib/javasvn.jar /usr/share/java/javasvn.jar However, the link should be relative. The symlink warnings are repeated for these files: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.core_1.1.4/lib/ganymed.jar /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.core_1.1.4/lib/svnjavahl.jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 00:47:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090047.k790lxPb012358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-08 20:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.33.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Aug 9 2006 Alain Portal 2.33.0-1 - Update to 2.33.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 00:53:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183322] Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090053.k790rixD012654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 00:54:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090054.k790sAeb012718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Alias: conexusmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 Bug 199020 depends on bug 183322, which changed state. Bug 183322 Summary: Review Request: conexus (network and serial I/O library with Gtkmm widgets) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183322 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 01:22:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 21:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090122.k791MPaT014284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-08-08 21:13 EST ------- Patrice: Don't worry, Rathann and I are in active communication; he knows exactly what my status on this review is. :-) As for why I hadn't blocked FE-REVIEW yet, I was waiting until its dependent bug (187609) cleared review. There were some issues, but they've, well, sort of been cleared up. Other issues cropped up which delayed my turn in this review, but Rathann was understanding. (Thanks!) Rathann: Off the cuff, since tre has 'ExcludeArch: x86_64', shouldn't crm114 have it, too? I'd also welcome a newer version, if it's available. :-) I'll start poking this a little. Let me know if you have any revisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:11:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090311.k793Btlb018998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From wolters.liste at gmx.net 2006-08-08 23:02 EST ------- There is one problem now: before I was able to upload the ktorrent to cvs and start packaging, a new major version was released. It is a jump from version 1.2 to 2.0 with new features: - Support for distributed hash tables (mainline version) - Protocol encryption - Bandwith scheduling - Directory scanner to automatically load torrents in certain directories - Trackers can now be added to torrents - File prioritization for multi file torrents The old spec file works when I modify the file list and the version number as well. However, the installation of the 2.0 rpm has a file conflict with kdelibs, and I added %exclude %{_datadir}/mimelnk/application/x-bittorrent.desktop in the spec file. The new spec file and SRPM can be found here: Spec: http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/fedorarpms/ktorrent.spec SRPM: http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/fedorarpms/ktorrent-2.0-1.src.rpm Is the package in this form still approved/accepted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:20:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090320.k793KJHN019519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-08-08 23:10 EST ------- Hi Paul, * The .spec file you're linking to is not the same included in the .src.rpm. Anyway, I'm reviewing the one from the source rpm. * %{?smp_flags} should be %{?_smp_mflags}. * It seems a common practice in Extras is to use "dl.sourceforge.net" as value for the 'Source' tag instead of a mirror. This is not a blocker, though. Everything else looks fine. Fix the _smp_mflags typo and I'll approve this package. REVIEW (genchemlab-1.0-3) + rpmlint shows no error. + package meets the naming guidelines. + spec-file is properly named. X package doesn't meet the packaging guidelines - Parallel make macro should be %{?_smp_mflags} not %{?smp_flags} :) + package license is open-source compatible (GPL). + license field matches the actual license. + license file included in %doc. + spec file is written in english. + spec file is legible. + source files match upstream: ef364cff3f3e2dba4c62a5d1a0084bae genchemlab-1.0.tgz + package successfully compiled, built and tested on i386 (rawhide). + all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + package doesn't need to use %find_lang (no locales present). + package doesn't contain shared libraries. + package isn't relocatable. + package owns all directories that it creates. + no duplicate files in %files. + file permissions are properly set. + package has a %clean section containing rm -rf %{buildroot}. + package uses macros consistently. + package contains code, not content. + no -doc subpackage needed. + %docs don't affect application runtime. + package doesn't contain headers, static libraries or pkgconfig files (no devel package). + GUI application; includes .desktop file installed correctly with desktop-file-install. + package doesn't own directories owned by other packages. + package builds fine in mock (fedora-development-i386-core). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090325.k793PuQl019701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-08 23:16 EST ------- Sure, (still) approved, though I don't see any %exclude %{_datadir}/mimelnk/application/x-bittorrent.desktop in the referenced specfile. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:32:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090332.k793WDQt019849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-08 23:22 EST ------- OK, the updated package builds fine and still looks OK. The dist tag is there, as is the license file. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:33:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201637] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090333.k793XrDQ019920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201637 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:34:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201638] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090334.k793Y1hT019945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201638 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:35:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090335.k793ZsTZ020054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-08 23:26 EST ------- Why has this been closed and checked in? I don't see any approval, and it's still blocking FE-NEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 03:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090341.k793fjo6020239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 04:55:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090455.k794txib022205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 peter.de.groot at det.wa.edu.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.de.groot at det.wa.edu.au ------- Additional Comments From peter.de.groot at det.wa.edu.au 2006-08-09 00:46 EST ------- Sorry ... Newb problem ... I downloaded the src rpm from above and did a rpmbuild and rpm -i to install.... it appeared to compile via apsx and install ok. and the files are in the right place. I have a working samba, and squid ntlm auth works. I have added apache to the squid group. However this it does not seem to work for me.. Both with IE This is a bit distressing ... as I have had it working on another distro sum of my apache module ... sum mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.so 15693 16 Does this match yours ? Did I build the rpm correctly ... I assumed the spec file was in the source rpm ...newb question this :-) I did a rpmbuild --rebuild I am using FC 5 Apache 2.2.2 samba version 3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 drwxr-x--- 2 root squid 4096 Aug 8 14:10 winbindd_privileged Thanks ... log dump from apache follows Peter [Wed Aug 09 12:40:09 2006] [debug] mod_ntlm_winbind.c(1088): [client 10.251.20.195] doing ntlm auth dance [Wed Aug 09 12:40:09 2006] [debug] mod_ntlm_winbind.c(529): [client 10.251.20.195] Launched ntlm_helper, pid 29040 [Wed Aug 09 12:40:09 2006] [debug] mod_ntlm_winbind.c(699): [client 10.251.20.195] creating auth user [Wed Aug 09 12:40:09 2006] [debug] mod_ntlm_winbind.c(750): [client 10.251.20.195] parsing reply from helper to YR TlR MTVNTUAABAAAAB7IIogoACgAyAAAACgAKACgAAAAFASgKAAAAD0M3MTItUEVURVJDVVJSSUM0MTgy\n [2006/08/09 12:40:09, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:debug_ntlmssp_flags(63) Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa208b207 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_UNICODE NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_OEM NTLMSSP_REQUEST_TARGET NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_DOMAIN_SUPPLIED NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_WORKSTATION_SUPPLIED NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_ALWAYS_SIGN NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_128 NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_56 [Wed Aug 09 12:40:09 2006] [debug] mod_ntlm_winbind.c(788): [client 10.251.20.195] got response: TT TlRMTVNTUAACAAAAFA AUADAAAAAFgomiMfpcnS8gMLUAAAAAAAAAAKoAqgBEAAAAQwBVAFIAUgBJAEMANAAxADgAMgACABQAQwBVAFIAUgBJAEMANAAxADgAMgABABoAQwBVAFIA UgBJAEMANAAxADgAMgAtADAANQAEACYAYwB1AHIAcgBpAGMANAAxADgAMgAuAGkAbgB0AGUAcgBuAGEAbAADAEIAYwB1AHIAcgBpAGMANAAxADgAMgAtAD AANQAuAGMAdQByAHIAaQBjADQAMQA4ADIALgBpAG4AdABlAHIAbgBhAGwAAAAAAA== [Wed Aug 09 12:40:09 2006] [debug] mod_ntlm_winbind.c(455): [client 10.251.20.195] sending back TlRMTVNTUAACAAAAFAAUAD AAAAAFgomiMfpcnS8gMLUAAAAAAAAAAKoAqgBEAAAAQwBVAFIAUgBJAEMANAAxADgAMgACABQAQwBVAFIAUgBJAEMANAAxADgAMgABABoAQwBVAFIAUgBJ AEMANAAxADgAMgAtADAANQAEACYAYwB1AHIAcgBpAGMANAAxADgAMgAuAGkAbgB0AGUAcgBuAGEAbAADAEIAYwB1AHIAcgBpAGMANAAxADgAMgAtADAANQ AuAGMAdQByAHIAaQBjADQAMQA4ADIALgBpAG4AdABlAHIAbgBhAGwAAAAAAA== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 05:04:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090504.k7954QN6022423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 05:22:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090522.k795MTYh022897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-09 01:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Make that review block FE-DEADREVIEW I fail to see the usefulness of FE-DEADREVIEW. All it does is to add further bureaucracy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 06:40:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 02:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090640.k796ecTi025243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529 ------- Additional Comments From work.eric at gmail.com 2006-08-09 02:31 EST ------- SPEC: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/development/SPECS/gtkdatabox.spec SRPM: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/development/SRPMS/gtkdatabox-0.6.0.0-1.fc5.src.rpm Sorry for the delay but here is the updated .spec file and .srpm. I made the requested changes: * add %post/%postun for -devel * added examples/*.c to -devel Also updated to the latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 08:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 04:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090807.k7987Bji030328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-08-09 03:57 EST ------- There seems to be a packaging mistake here. #rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] package slab-1.0-5.20060721cvs (which is newer than slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs) is already installed Suspend menu item doesnt show up which I click "log out". Log out was called Exit in the previous package. I am not sure calling neat is useful for the end user. They usually wouldnt be setting up profiles. If the network is wireless, it should probably call Network Manager instead although the user interface is a applet which isnt suitable for direct interaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 08:18:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 04:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090818.k798I3i2031073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-09 04:08 EST ------- If I understand well it is not something mandatory, it may help contributors who want to submit a package, as in case it has allready been submitted but abandonned they can see it by looking at the FE-DEADREVIEW tree. If it was mandatory sure it would add more bureaucracy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 08:40:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 04:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090840.k798eHH2000554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-08-09 04:30 EST ------- Confused... But make the a complet review please! Someone could review this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 09:25:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 05:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608090925.k799PoMW003220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-09 05:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Patrice: Don't worry, Rathann and I are in active communication; he knows > exactly what my status on this review is. :-) You both know, but setting FE-REVIEW helps others know :-), so it is important to set it when you are sure that you'll review the package such that it appears as such, for example here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-REVIEW&hide_resolved=1 and also don't appear anymore in FE-NEW as a package to be reviewed... not a big deal, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 10:10:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201808] request for package in extras: aria2 (command line BitTorrent client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091010.k79AAo9N006255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: request for package in extras: aria2 (command line BitTorrent client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201808 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-09 06:01 EST ------- If you're interested in developing this package so as to meet the Fedora Packaging Guidelines and to maintain it yourself in Extras, you should read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines If not, it would be better to add it here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList in the hope that someone will pick up the package and maintain it in Extras themselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 10:52:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091052.k79AqlaN009026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 06:43 EST ------- Package imported, devel build successful, FC-4 and FC-5 branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 10:56:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091056.k79AuQqg009275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 06:47 EST ------- Any signs of the update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 10:58:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091058.k79AwXU7009411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 Bug 178904 depends on bug 200639, which changed state. Bug 200639 Summary: Either geckosharp or the glib bindings are causing a sigsegv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200639 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 11:06:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091106.k79B6DJS010067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 06:56 EST ------- Posted a question to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLegalIssues to keep track of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 11:17:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091117.k79BHoLq010780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 07:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/genchemlab.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/genchemlab-1.0-4.src.rpm Fixed the _smp_mflags thing * It seems a common practice in Extras is to use "dl.sourceforge.net" as value for the 'Source' tag instead of a mirror. This is not a blocker, though. sourceforge enjoys acting up on occassion which is why I always give a direct link to the ftp place which has the tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 11:59:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091159.k79BxWvU012763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 07:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o-5.5-7.src.rpm Fixes #10 I've even added R pkg-config to the devel requires! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091211.k79CBSO5013290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-08-09 08:02 EST ------- The log shows that the module itself works, ntlm_auth helper was invoked and successfully connected to winbindd... Some ideas: - Does your IE ask for login/password? If so, did you use "DOMAIN\user" or just "user" for login? - What is your "KeepAlive" parameter in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf? Anyway, try "KeepAlive on" and "MaxKeepAliveRequests 100" or another big enough value -- but NOT zero ("0") value. It these "two ideas" help nothing, send me (for my e-mail) your httpd.conf and /etc/httpd/conf.d/ntlm_winbind.conf ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:11:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091211.k79CBljT013322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-09 08:02 EST ------- Ping? I've updated to last release. Package you can found here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/klamav-0.38-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:12:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091212.k79CCvqw013382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-08-09 08:03 EST ------- "It these" => "If these" :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:14:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091214.k79CEWGU013529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-09 08:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I've even added R pkg-config to the devel requires! Unfortunately the pkg-config program comes in a package called pkgconfig so you need an R: pkgconfig rather than an R: pkg-config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:17:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091217.k79CHNZp013682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 08:07 EST ------- There's a typo now: %define debug_packahe %{nil} Also, please put Requires: pkgconfig in a separate line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:19:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091219.k79CJma7013773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-09 08:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Bad > > %{_libdir}/%{name}/lib*.la > > Why? There should be no .la or .a files in a package > Quoting from the specfile: "# .la files are needed for ltdl" What is not clear about that? > Should /sbin/ldconfig not be also executed? Quoting myself from comment #3: "The .so files also are not needed to link against, since this are not libs but plugins. The -devel package is to develop new plugins, not to develop programs using the existing ones, hence no .so files." Since they are not used to link against directly calling ldconfig is not needed, actually since they are not in a dir searched by ldconfig, calling ldconfig is futile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:36:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] New: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/plotutils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/plotutils-2.5-1.src.rpm Description: The GNU plotutils package contains software for both programmers and technical users. Its centerpiece is libplot, a powerful C/C++ function library for exporting 2-D vector graphics in many file formats, both vector and raster. It can also do vector graphics animations. Besides libplot, the package contains command-line programs for plotting scientific data. Many of them use libplot to export graphics. Notes to reviewer: - the cp's in the %prep section replace a symlink used in the source tree to share the same source file across multiple directories. This was breaking the debuginfo package. - examples moved to /usr/share/doc where they belong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091240.k79Ce6ZI014735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 08:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/db4o.spec Fixes the above Is there a reason for having the pkgconfig on another line? From what I can see, there is nothing in the docs about doing it that way (and I certainly haven't on other packages) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 12:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091240.k79Ce6q2014731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |196510 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 13:07:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091307.k79D7foH015927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-09 08:58 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM is not silent W: mbuffer mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 13:17:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091317.k79DHvus016453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-09 09:08 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent W: xfsdump summary-ended-with-dot Administrative utilities for the XFS filesystem. Summary ends with a dot. ==> Remove dot at end of Summary description E: xfsdump no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. ==> you have not added Changelog. Add it. W: xfsdump mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. When i look at SPEC file i found :- - dist tag is missing - I dont think Obsoletes and Conflicts is needed as package name is not changed from previous version. - You have added twice make %{?_smp_mflags}. Remove one line - No Document files added. try to add under %files %doc README doc/COPYING doc/CHANGES doc/README.xfsdump doc/xfsdump_ts.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 13:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091331.k79DVa8R017248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-09 09:22 EST ------- Given that I already approved this package back in the old days, I'll take another quick look at it later today when I a free moment or two; shouldn't take too long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 15:01:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091501.k79F1gu9021761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 15:12:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091512.k79FCrmk022785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 11:03 EST ------- Having each explicit dependency in a separate line makes it easier to see what is required. I, for one, had some trouble finding your addition at first glance. That said, it's not a blocker, so the current version is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 15:18:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091518.k79FI2Q2023365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-09 11:08 EST ------- In the interests of getting everything straightened out, I'll go ahead and review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 15:31:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091531.k79FV1Zl024176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 11:21 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net-1.0.7-6.src.rpm Lots of changes! Package now has the notorious mono hack included Quite a lot of fixes to the spec file (I think I was drunk when I wrote it!) Now includes a .pc file (means you can have -pkg:mysql-connector-net) Includes a devel package with examples and a testsuite It's warm, it's cuddly, it needs approving! ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 15:51:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091551.k79FpaI0026116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 11:42 EST ------- Thanks for such a wonderful first review (on your part). Keep up the good work and I'll see you on IRC :-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 15:55:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201873] New: Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201873 Summary: Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/wmix.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/wmix-3.1-1.src.rpm Description: Dockapp mixer for OSS or ALSA. Allows toggling record source, muting individual channels, adjusting volume and balance, all in a compact dockapp size, with TV-like on-screen-display for volume levels. Supports mousewheel to adjust current channel volume, and can be controlled remotely with SIGUSR1 / SIGUSR2 to adjust the volume, too. Can use a configuration file to control some of the features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 15:59:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091559.k79Fxtxv026707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-09 11:50 EST ------- The package imported into cvs still has the wrong pkg-config dependency for the -devel package, which will make this package uninstallable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 16:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091629.k79GTc3S028672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-09 12:20 EST ------- OK, you have right. Here the next release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma-2.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 16:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] Review Request: MemProf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091640.k79Geal8029226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MemProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-09 12:30 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Why only i386? Does this not work on x86_64? What about all our other arches? - GCONF needs help: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-ff64cd482595764f672082d5a3b83e1fc22962e8 - Package fails to build, probably missing intltool BuildRequires, possibly more. + autoreconf configure.in:24: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_INTLTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33363 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 16:41:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197791] Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091641.k79GfONW029356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stacaccli - Stateless Cached Client Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197791 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 16:58:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] Review Request: MemProf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091658.k79GwESl030412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MemProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-08-09 12:48 EST ------- Is this something needed for Core, or could it be in Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 17:44:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091744.k79Hi0hr000421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-09 13:34 EST ------- It seems as if this is a problem with the openvpn package and should be solved there, correct? If so please propose this patch to either the selinux policy or the openvpn package (and provide a link to the bugzilla id here). If not please explain to me why this is NetworkManager-openvpn specific. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 17:57:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091757.k79Hvlrf001521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-08-09 13:48 EST ------- Thanks for the comments, I think I've addressed the issues except for the dist tag. (not sure how that is suppose to be handled). The Buildrequires has also been fixed to include the needed devel libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 18:02:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091802.k79I2PJl002121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-08-09 13:52 EST ------- Ohh one other note: The patch to remove libdm has been checked in upstream, it is not the same patch as in the original post but meets the same goal of not needing libdm-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 18:04:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091804.k79I4Hv2002350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-09 13:54 EST ------- If the fixes work, I'll get them included in the upstream selinux-policy package. What I'm asking here is for someone actually using this package with SELinux enabled to try them out and see if they fix the issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 18:07:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091807.k79I7tJO002777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 ------- Additional Comments From ad+rh-bugzilla at uni-x.org 2006-08-09 13:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint on SRPM is not silent > W: mbuffer mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a > cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Thanks, did rpmlint just against the binary rpm. Now fixed it without version bump (the 2 compile options needed another tab indent). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 18:50:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201873] Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091850.k79IoNcQ007666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201873 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jtorresh at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 18:59:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] New: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: jakub at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: cvs://:cvs.devel.redhat.com/cvs/dist/rpms/compat-gcc-34/devel/compat-gcc-34.spec SRPM URL: make srpm in cvs.devel checkout Description: This package is analoguous to compat-gcc-32 in FC5 and earlier. The proposed compat compiler/libraries set for FC6/RHEL5 is: compat-gcc-34 (subpackages compat-gcc-34, compat-gcc-34-{c++,g77,libf2c}) is GCC 3.4.6-RH compiler (no compat-libstdc++-34, as GCC 4.1.1-RH libstdc++ is backwards compatible with 3.4.6-RH). compat-gcc-32 will only build compat-libstdc++-32 subpackage and compat-libstdc++-296 will still exist too, just with all pre-2.96-RH libraries nuked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:14:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091914.k79JEQd7010473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-09 15:04 EST ------- I personally think that this should live in extras not core. unless something in core needs the older compiler to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:16:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091916.k79JGZJT010733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:27:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091927.k79JRwqu011945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-09 15:18 EST ------- For the record here is the reply I got from upstream about the 2 different versions: --- Hi, On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:07:09PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > The one in the core package seems to be newer. I've attached a patch > > which upgrades the version on your website to this newer version, and > > thus shows the differences. > > > > Do you know how this is possible? That's very odd indeed - I have no idea how it happened. However, I don't use Linux nor GKrellM anymore since I've switched to FreeBSD, so I wont be making any updates to the sources. You're free to take over maintaining the plug-in if you'd like. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:31:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091931.k79JV783012246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-09 15:21 EST ------- I see that you've been sponsored by Tibbs some time ago, as I alreadyu said this packages looks good -> Approved! Feel free to import and build this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:54:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091954.k79JsvOK013997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 15:45 EST ------- So is anyone reviewing this formally? If not, I'm interested, as this solves one of the dependencies for oolite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:55:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091955.k79Jtsdd014110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 ------- Additional Comments From ezannoni at redhat.com 2006-08-09 15:46 EST ------- No, this needs to be in the core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:57:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091957.k79Jvm7m014188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-08-09 15:48 EST ------- Review (genchemlab-1.0-4) < X package doesn't meet the packaging guidelines > + package meets the packaging guidelines APPROVED then :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 19:59:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608091959.k79JxXf5014296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 20:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201470] Review Request: genchemlab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092018.k79KI9EX015064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genchemlab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201470 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 20:20:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092020.k79KKVBg015299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-09 16:11 EST ------- Dominik, it's still blocking FE-NEW, so no one has formally reviewed this yet. Go for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 20:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092044.k79Kixhf016967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 16:35 EST ------- Okay Good Builds fine and actually works rpmlint is clean on all packages (with the exceptions listed above which I'm willing to accept) No dupes in the BRs Includes documentation No issues with directory ownership Bad Needs pkgconfig adding to the R: on the devel You've packaged the same README in the main and devel package Unsure find -type f -regex '.*\.\(cpp\|h\|svg\)' -perm +111 -exec chmod -x {} ';' - seems like overkill to me. Fix the two bads (which aren't that bad!), and it's good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 20:58:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092058.k79KwabD017860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-09 16:49 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - Defining gcc_version and then using it in all places you could use Version: is silly, and unnecessarily complicated. - Ditto gcc_release - Don't start summary with "The" - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Lots of Obsoletes w/out provides - PreReq instead of Requires(pre) or Requires(post) or just Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:08:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092108.k79L84oo018594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-08-09 16:58 EST ------- OK, I will do another formal review ASAP (I'm pretty busy ATM). There are still some things in the specfile I'm not happy with, mainly the changelog and the permissions of some dirs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:17:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177603] Review Request: libpri In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092117.k79LHbFg019234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpri https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177603 ------- Additional Comments From erik at ilsw.com 2006-08-09 17:08 EST ------- http://www.ocjtech.us/libpri-1.2.2-1.src.rpm seems to be an out of date url, is there a more up to date one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] New: Review Request: tetex-elsevier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/tetex-elsevier.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/tetex-elsevier-0.1.20060416-1.src.rpm Description: LaTeX style files for the Elsevier publisher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:20:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092120.k79LK2wK019389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 jakub at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat.com 2006-08-09 17:10 EST ------- New spec file checked into CVS, except for the - Lots of Obsoletes w/out provides point. The Obsoletes are in primarily to avoid keeping 10 years old compat gcc's around on upgrades and because some of the old compat packages conflict with this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:30:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092130.k79LUxNB019992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-09 17:21 EST ------- The package consist in the style file and documentation files found on the elsevier web site. There is a package in ctan but it is very outdated. The documentation files don't have an explicit licence but they are tighly associated with the style files and available from the same web page so I packaged the documentation along. I didn't packaged te documentation sources, although they are available at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:33:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201498] Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092133.k79LXg65020177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201498 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 17:24 EST ------- Good : rpmlint clean no dupes no directory ownership problems no missing requires has documentation software works no missing BRs no incorrect permissions APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:38:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092138.k79LcBI8020793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 201498 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 17:28 EST ------- Good No dupes Compiles cleanly No permission issues No directory ownership problems rpmlint happy packages can compile against it without a problem (xdrawchem used as a test) Has documentation Licences fine Group okay Has R pkgconfig for the devel package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:38:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201498] Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092138.k79LcOae020811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201498 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|201485 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092150.k79LoZ0G021579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 17:41 EST ------- Okay. I'm happy with them. The software works fine Good Licence fine Includes update-icon-cache No permission problems No directory ownership problems Has documentation (devel doesn't, can be ignored) Software works and installs No missing R's when installed No missing BRs or Rs when compiling Bad Missing rm -rf %{buildroot} at the start of %install Fix the one bad and it's good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 21:58:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092158.k79LwMbj021871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 17:48 EST ------- Branches built successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:05:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092205.k79M5kG0022246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 17:56 EST ------- Can you also check that if you use the fedora libtool if the .la files are still needed? Please just upload the new spec file (unless something happens in the src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:11:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092211.k79MBhBi022635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 18:02 EST ------- Very well, I'll review this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:12:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092212.k79MCNT7022708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-09 18:03 EST ------- New srpm (shipping the web page wasn't convenient): http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/tetex-elsevier-0.1.20060416-2.src.rpm - Ship a README.fedora file instead of packaging the web page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:15:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092215.k79MFGfY022893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 18:05 EST ------- I'll review this, too, since it depends on #197649. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:16:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092216.k79MGbat023168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rpm at greysector.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:17:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092217.k79MHAY8023303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rpm at greysector.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:25:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092225.k79MPpq1024068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 18:16 EST ------- It may be worth actually patching the app to use the fedora libtool and seems pretty trivial to do... in LoaderModule.cpp, Line 86 change lt_dlopen() to lt_dlopenext() and remove the extension on the passed in filename There may be a couple more of those, so you'll need to grep the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092231.k79MVfoH024453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 22:38:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092238.k79McHLU024756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-09 18:28 EST ------- Looking at the spec file You need Requires (post) : ldconfig unless you change post to be -p /sbin/ldconfig mkdir docs-to-include Where exactly does that get made? Why not just create a directory in the buildroot and shift from there rather than interfere with the dearchived source? This is not a complaint, just a suggestion. Other than patches, doing things in the BUILD I've always considered a bad idea (TM) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 9 23:13:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201485] Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608092313.k79NDRen026077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbabel - Chemistry software file format converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201485 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 19:03 EST ------- Package imported and built for devel, FC-4 and FC-5 branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 00:22:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201498] Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100022.k7A0MBlG028191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdrawchem - 2D chemical structures drawing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201498 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 20:12 EST ------- Imported (and added dist tag), devel build successful, FC-4 and FC-5 braches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 00:24:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100024.k7A0O6Vh028249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-09 20:14 EST ------- Shouldn't this block FE-REVIEW instead of FC-REVIEW? I don't think this is destined for core quite yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 00:26:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100026.k7A0QCFZ028323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 20:16 EST ------- It should, my mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 00:28:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100028.k7A0S2Xr028401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-09 20:18 EST ------- Corrected to block FE-REVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 00:45:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100045.k7A0jdLo028948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-09 20:36 EST ------- In accordince with the stalled review policy, I will close out this review in one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 00:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100051.k7A0p6dr029085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-09 20:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133896) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133896&action=view) Patch to allow ltdl to load from an so instead of an la file Hey Hans, Here's a patch to load the modules from the .so file if the .la file is not present. This patch would be a good starting point with upstream but may need a little work (I'm not sure whether the fallback lt_dlopen() is necessary and my C++ dates from before the STL so you can tell how rusty I am.) I'll submit my spec file as well so you can diff for the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 00:52:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100052.k7A0qxOw029128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-09 20:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133897) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133897&action=view) My spec file. Patch the source. Include the .so file and rm the .la file. P.S. I suck at pinball :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 01:15:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100115.k7A1F1rH029859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-09 21:05 EST ------- The only rpmlint complaint: W: gstm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs There is a mix of indentation types used in the spec, but I don't know if there's a particular use that it's complaining about. What's the point of the BuildRequires: openssh? That just gives you ssh-keygen and some documentation; did you mean to BR: openssh-clients instead? Or, perhaps, did you mean to Requires: openssh-clients? Currently there's no SSH dependency in the final package. * source files match upstream: 7fa71b86969d8d695c3b062780a5694e gstm-1.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. O specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. ? BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: gstm = 1.2-1.fc6 = libICE.so.6()(64bit) libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit) libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-keyring.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * GUI app; desktop file looks OK and is installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 01:26:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100126.k7A1QU0e030306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From peter.de.groot at det.wa.edu.au 2006-08-09 21:17 EST ------- Bingo ..... Keepalive was set to OFF Enabled it and it works great... many thanks... BTW.. I did not change this parameter on my server....is it set to off by default ?? Perhaps something to check on install ??? Thanks again Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 01:58:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177603] Review Request: libpri In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100158.k7A1wYE9031380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpri https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177603 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-09 21:49 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2/fedora/5/SRPMS/libpri-1.2.3-1.fc5.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2/fedora/5/SRPMS/libpri-1.2.3-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 02:02:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100202.k7A22W8Z031582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-08-09 21:53 EST ------- Built.... A long time ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 02:36:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100236.k7A2axWT032605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 03:27:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100327.k7A3RJ5K001883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-09 23:17 EST ------- Whew! ok :) 1. It appears to me that this proxy can be run as a non-root user and still be able to do everything needed except use the "switch_user" command. (Read another way, it looks like you only need to run dircproxy as root if you want to use "switch_user".) Let's find a way to have this service start up as a non-root user by default (perhaps just "nobody" as README.identd suggests). It would seem to make sense to patch /etc/init.d/dircproxy to read values from /etc/sysconf/dircproxy (as other init scripts do) to determine what user to run under, etc. 2. The release tag here, as this is a beta package, should be something like: 0.x.beta%{?dist} Where x is the actual release. (On coming out of beta, it should start being the normal "x%{?dist}".) See wiki - Packaging/NamingGuidelines. 3. rpmlint emits two warnings -- both of these are easy enough to fix. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. X release tag doesn't meet naming guidelines. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + source files match upstream: bd6abe933f90d80fbc71a00563f9c7de dircproxy-1.2.0-beta.tar.bz bd6abe933f90d80fbc71a00563f9c7de dircproxy-1.2.0-beta.tar.bz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (fc5/x86_64). X rpmlint is silent. [build at zeus dircproxy]$ rpmlint dircproxy-1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5.src.rpm W: dircproxy mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs [build at zeus x86_64]$ rpmlint dircproxy-1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5.x86_64.rpm W: dircproxy wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dircproxy-1.2.0/README.ssl + final provides and requires are sane: ** dircproxy-1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5.x86_64.rpm == provides config(dircproxy) = 1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5 dircproxy = 1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5 == requires /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl config(dircproxy) = 1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5 perl(strict) perl(vars) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. O %check is not present, but there are no tests defined O scriptlets look sane, and conform to ScriptletSnippets + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 03:32:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100332.k7A3W05k002037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-09 23:22 EST ------- Spec file reflects requested changes. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 04:11:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100411.k7A4BuU4003417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 07:25:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201980] New: Add Remove Programs / Software updater Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201980 Summary: Add Remove Programs / Software updater Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: ian1959 at westnet.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description of problem: Consumption of bandwidth / Auto close when one action is completed,requiring restart to continue using the utility. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: These problems occur each time the applications are run. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results:Applications consume full bandwidth (adsl 512/128) Add remove programs closes automatically after a single operation. Expected results: I would like to be able to browse the web and or send receive mail, etc, while the applications are in progress (ie: updating software). Be able to install or remove a program with Add Remove Programs and not have to restart it to use it again. Additional info:There is no available help files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 07:30:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201980] Add Remove Programs / Software updater In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100730.k7A7UNHN011743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Add Remove Programs / Software updater https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201980 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-08-10 03:20 EST ------- Seems like a real problem with Pirut (the default graphical package add/remove tool), and not a package review request. Fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 08:03:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100803.k7A8365i014198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-10 03:53 EST ------- SPEC: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d-0.5.16.0-2.src.rpm > Needs pkgconfig adding to the R: on the devel Actually, k3d doesn't provide any pkgconfig .pc file, it provides its own 'k3d-config' executable. > You've packaged the same README in the main and devel package Fixed. > find -type f -regex '.*\.\(cpp\|h\|svg\)' -perm +111 -exec chmod -x {} ';' - Ah the lovely find command. Well I'd still rather do that than do a massive chmod -x over the whole tree since it contains all sorts of executable scripts and whatnot. Or did you have something even simpler in mind ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 09:32:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100932.k7A9WFA9021195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 05:21 EST ------- Okay, I'm happy with that. Is it worth adding the tests directory into the -devel directory as well as the docs/xml/sample_document.k3d file? Might be a useful addition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 09:49:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608100949.k7A9nNcB022249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-10 05:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Bad > Missing rm -rf %{buildroot} at the start of %install > Good catch! New version with this fixed (only specfile changed): Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pinball.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pinball-0.3.1-5.src.rpm (In reply to comment #9) > Can you also check that if you use the fedora libtool if the .la files are > still needed? Yes they are still needed. (In reply to comment #10) > It may be worth actually patching the app to use the fedora libtool and seems > pretty trivial to do... > It already is using the Fedora/system libtool, quoting from %setup: "rm -fr libltdl", so there is no way its using its own version :) > in LoaderModule.cpp, Line 86 change > > lt_dlopen() to lt_dlopenext() and remove the extension on the passed in filename > > There may be a couple more of those, so you'll need to grep the source. That is not using the Fedora libtool, that is patching arounds libltdl's behaviour / default use to open the .la files. All kde apps with plugings (as in Fedora) do this, and I see no reason why pinball shouldn't/couldn't there is no reason to deviate from upstream here / use ltdl in a non standard way here. .la files are evil / must be removed for normal libraries which are intended to link against, because when an application gets build using libtool and those .la files are there libtool will prefer the .la files above the .so files and will use the often broken dependencies in those .la files instead of the soname deps in the .so files (which get tracked by rpm). This is known as libtool dependency hell, but this only happens with libraries which are intented to link against by other apps and which thus are usually installed directly into %_libdir and not into a subdir of it as the *plugins* are. So there is no reason to start patching and deviating from upstream here, the .la files are harmless because they are for plugins and beside harmless also needed as this is the default mode of operation of ltdl. If you don't like this file a bug against ltdl and the zillion of kde packages doing the same. (In reply to comment #11) > Created an attachment (id=133896) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133896&action=view) [edit] > Patch to allow ltdl to load from an so instead of an la file > > Hey Hans, Here's a patch to load the modules from the .so file if the .la file > is not present. This patch would be a good starting point with upstream but > may need a little work (I'm not sure whether the fallback lt_dlopen() is > necessary and my C++ dates from before the STL so you can tell how rusty I am.) > I'll submit my spec file as well so you can diff for the changes. Thanks, but no thanks see above for the reasoning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 10:14:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101014.k7AAEDXw023952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-08-10 06:04 EST ------- > is it set to off by default? Yep. Atleast under Fedora. Don't know why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 10:43:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] New: Review Request: brandy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 Summary: Review Request: brandy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/brandy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/brandy-1.0.19-1.src.rpm Description: Brandy is an open source, GPL implementation of BBC BASIC V. It comes with documentation and example in %{_docdir}. I've not split the package into main binary and doc package as I'm not sure it warrants it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 10:49:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] New: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andy at smile.org.ua QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/fmio.spec SRPM URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/fmio-2.0.8-2.src.rpm Description: The fmio is a small program to set and change fm radio card parameters. It sets frequency, volume of the card, reports signal strength on the working frequency and can set the radio card output to mono (if the card driver supports it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 10:50:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101050.k7AAoffR026315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 06:41 EST ------- rpmlint on the src package is giving the warning that you've mixed spaces with tabs builds cleaning in mock installs cleanly using yun localinstall rpm -qa --requires is not showing anything untoward I'll need to do the full review when I'm sitting infront of the machine. Can you address the mixed spaces and tabs and just upload a new spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 10:56:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101056.k7AAuYxO026665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-10 06:47 EST ------- Not a bad idea but the test directory is not easily packagable, we'd have to provide custom Makefiles... We could add the gzip'ed sample file to the devel package, or even to the main package, i think it's a good idea. Is this a must item or did you approve the package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 11:02:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101102.k7AB21o8026973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 06:52 EST ------- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 11:26:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101126.k7ABQvVx028102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 07:17 EST ------- Sorry. Should be up in the next couple of mins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101215.k7ACFAFJ031207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From wolters.liste at gmx.net 2006-08-10 08:05 EST ------- Thanks for your hint, you're right. I somehow copied the old version instead of the new one. Please give me short feedback about the newest version and the exclude line, after that I will import ktorrent 2.0 to the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:21:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101221.k7ACLRMI031562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-08-10 08:12 EST ------- News? Some other questions: - What I have to do when I'll release ss5-3.6.1 ? - I have some installation on RedHat AS4.0, can I make a branches for RH? - Can I expose Fedora logo on my web site to promote the package? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:36:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101236.k7ACaR59032210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-10 08:27 EST ------- >From a quick look at the srpm name, it doesn't seems to be named according to the naming guidelines (although this case is a bit unusuall). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:39:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178932] Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101239.k7ACd33r032373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178932 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:41:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101241.k7ACf6v2032449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101252.k7ACqatR000564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-10 08:43 EST ------- Review ====== - rpmlint clean - package and spec file name OK - package meets guidelines - license is GPL, matches spec, text included - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstrem - package builds OK in mock for FC5.x86_64 - BR's OK - no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions issues - no duplicate files - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no desktop file needed for CLI app - package appears to function correctly - no scriptlets Needswork: * No point including the NEWS file as it just says to look in ChangeLog Are you sponsored? I don't see your bugzilla address in owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:52:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101252.k7ACqeXF000577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 08:43 EST ------- You will need to fix the permissions and mixed use of spaces and tabs Not sure about all the stuff at the top for determining the distro used - there seems to be alot in there for pre FC4. As FC4 is now officially in legacy, are you sure you need to go back that far? This is release 1, not 0 efont is another package and should be submitted as such. You then use R: (or BR if you need to use it to build). [ %{buildroot} != '/' ] || exit 1 isn't required You will also need BR : iconv What you need to do before a full review occurs is this 1. Decide how far back you want this package to go. If you really want it to go back prior to FC4, I would recommend either seeking advice on the Fedora Extras list or seeing what problems you will encounter as the distros get older and updates don't happen. 2. If you only support FC5 and FC6, you'll need to ditch a lot of the spec file 3. Separate out the fonts and source package and make this package drag in the fonts. Remember, other packages can make use of the fonts. You will need to submit that as another package for review and put a blocker on this package as it relies on the fonts package. 4. Fix the permissions - they won't be let through unless they're correctly set 5. Add BR iconv 6. Add BR whatever provides tic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101254.k7ACsEJU000697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 08:44 EST ------- Not much has changed, though I'm expecting an updated release from the Mono people soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 12:56:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101256.k7ACudSU000812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 13:06:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101306.k7AD6maU001318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 08:57 EST ------- Paul, thank you for (pre-?) reviewing. I will try to fix as requested by you quickly as I want to have this package released soon. However: for 4: Of what files do you refer the permissions are incorrect? for 5: iconv is in glibc-common so BR for iconv is not needed, I think for 6: BR tor tic (ncurses) is already. NOTE: this package is built cleanly in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 13:17:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101317.k7ADHUrj001784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 09:08 EST ------- For 4 : The patches - rpmlint showed them. They need to be 0644 5 and 6 - not a problem. For some reason, iconv always stuck in my head as being a package by itself! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 13:25:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101325.k7ADPkSl002236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 09:16 EST ------- Okay, now I am trying separate fonts from jfbterm quickly. When it is done, I will report it and block this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 13:39:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101339.k7ADdo3c003178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-10 09:30 EST ------- SPEC: http://www.poolshark.org/src/plotutils.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/plotutils-2.5-2.src.rpm > warning that you've mixed spaces with tabs Somehow I always get that even when I use tabs everywhere! :-) Fixed. > You need Requires (post) : ldconfig Fixed. > mkdir docs-to-include I think it's a pretty harmless trick to add directories straight into /usr/share/doc/%{name}. I use that already in the gtkmm packages. Now I'm not sure it would work the same way if you created it under BUILDROOT, because %doc works differently if you give it a relative or absolute path, and the relative path is always from the source dir... I think you'd have to explicitely move things from %{_datadir} into %{_docdir}/%{name}/ after installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 13:59:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101359.k7ADx2J2004063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:11:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101411.k7AEBdo2005145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-10 10:02 EST ------- andreas please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines namely the section on snapshot packages. it explains clearly how you should name and do the versioning on your package. otherwise after a quick glance it looks ok. you state how to get the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:13:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101413.k7AEDrmE005418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-10 10:04 EST ------- I forgot to say its nice to add a bash script that does a checkout and tarballs it up but that is not vital as long as we know how you created your tarball so that we can reproduce to verify source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:18:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101418.k7AEIWhi005850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-10 10:09 EST ------- (Still) looks good, good ahead and import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:18:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101418.k7AEIYp4005870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 10:09 EST ------- Oh!! Now font package is split: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-1.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jfbterm.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/jfbterm-0.4.7-1.src.rpm Currently, I cannot submit new review request: I encounter: Software error: DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: column "everconfirmed" specified more than once [for Statement "INSERT INTO bugs (version,rep_platform,bug_severity,priority,op_sys,assigned_to,bug_status,bug_file_loc,short_desc,target_milestone,resolution,qa_contact,everconfirmed,product_id,component_id, reporter, creation_ts, everconfirmed, estimated_time, remaining_time)VALUES ('devel','All','normal','normal','Linux','193505','NEW','','Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory','---','','197703','1','59','16465',166855, NOW(), 1, 0, 0)"] at Bugzilla/DB.pm line 71 Bugzilla::DB::SendSQL('INSERT INTO bugs (version,rep_platform,bug_severity,priority,...') called at Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1154 Bugzilla::Bug::Add('Bugzilla::Bug', 'HASH(0x1376c80)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/post_bug.cgi line 109 For help, please send mail to the webmaster (bugzilla-owner at redhat.com), giving this error message and the time and date of the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101421.k7AELaC5006062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 10:12 EST ------- Note: I am continuing to submit new package review request (efont-unicode-bdf) Both (efont-unicode-bdf and jfbterm) now bear no rpmlint complaint (for both src.rpm and binary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:24:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101424.k7AEOfGF006425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 10:15 EST ------- Remember to add a blocker on this bug with the bugzilla reference for the new package (this one will rely on that one). As soon as it's in, I'll add it to my review list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:42:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101442.k7AEga3T007860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 10:33 EST ------- Currently, I cannot submit new FE review request: I mailed this problem to bugzilla-owner at redhat.com and am waiting for reply. Once I am able to sumbit new request, I will make the new bug block this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:44:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] New: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec SRPM URL:http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides Unicode bitmap fonts provided by Electronic Font Open Laboratory. Note: this package blocks bug 201170 (jfbterm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202033] New: Review Request: deltarpm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 Summary: Review Request: deltarpm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: misa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/misa/rpms/deltarpm/deltarpm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/misa/rpms/deltarpm/deltarpm-3.3-2.src.rpm Description: Create deltas between rpms. A deltarpm contains the difference between an old and a new version of a rpm, which makes it possible to recreate the new rpm from the deltarpm and the old one. You don't have to have a copy of the old rpm, deltarpms can also work with installed rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101445.k7AEjVHb008154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:46:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101446.k7AEkheK008292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201170 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:47:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101447.k7AElFsF008363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202032 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 14:49:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101449.k7AEnD7a008671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 10:39 EST ------- Okay. I suceeded in submitting new FE review request (efont-unicode-bdf) Now, this bug is blocked by bug 202032. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101500.k7AF0eu4009660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:10:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101510.k7AFAsb8010499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-10 11:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > cvs tag -c ss5-3_5_9-1 > ERROR: The tag ss5-3_5_9-1 is already applied on a different branch > ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches > ss5-3_5_9-1:devel:mricchet:1150827849 It means that you have 2 packages with the exact same tag (name) in cvs. The usual way to workaround that issue is to add a dist tag, so that the release looks like Release: 1%{?dist} You could also read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag (it covers much more) After you have added the dist tag, you should be carefull to make sure that the upgrade path between fedora versions is clean, such that ss5 on fedora 6 appears newer for rpm than ss5 on fedora 5 which appears newer than ss5 on fc4 and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:14:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101514.k7AFEcMh010806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-10 11:05 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.34.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Aug 10 2006 Alain Portal 2.34.0-1 - Update to 2.34.0 - New mansupfr.tar.bz2 tarball where pages are now UTF-8 encoded - Remove BR utrac that is no more needed - fcron and gputils man pages are no more in manfrsup.tar.bz2, like some man and shadow-utils man pages. * Wed Aug 9 2006 Alain Portal 2.33.0-2 - New extra tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:15:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101515.k7AFFf1X010902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|202032 | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 11:06 EST ------- Just chewing over the spec - I've not built it yet (my remote machine connection is down) The whole font section in %prep - is this actually required for building the package? The calls to aclocal et al. Normally, the configure system calls them (unless the configure scripts have been messed with and need regenerating). The website certainly says that it's just a matter of running configure/make/make install On the make line, is there a reason for not using _smp_mflags? If there is (for example, it won't build), could you please add a comment to that effect? %{_mandir}/man*/* No. If it needs man1/package-name, then call it that. There are not normally that many man files to install and using /man*/* takes an incorrect ownership. A quick way if there are many files are to glob them together viz %{_mandir}/man1/foo* %{_mandir}/man4/bar* Can you please check them and if just upload a new spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:15:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101515.k7AFFrbD010935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201170 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:23:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101523.k7AFNhc6011338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-10 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > - What I have to do when I'll release ss5-3.6.1 ? Have a look at the beginning of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq > - I have some installation on RedHat AS4.0, can I make a branches for RH? There is no such thing in fedora. AS4.0 should be more or less compatible with fedora core 3 (and there is somewhere a repo with fedora extras packages rebuilt for centos4 which should be compatible with AS4), but inclusion of FC-3 branches isn't possible anymore as it is legacy since quite a long time. > - Can I expose Fedora logo on my web site to promote the package? I think the best information about the logo is to be found here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:35:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101535.k7AFZZJX012248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 11:26 EST ------- A. >The whole font section in %prep - is this actually required for building the package? not in build stage, however, make install requires these fonts. B. aclocal and so on... A patch is for Makefile.am. This is for removing sticky bit on /usr/bin/jfbterm binary. So perhaps aclocal and so on is needed, I think. C. man entry Split. new spec file and srpm is now uploaded. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jfbterm.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/jfbterm-0.4.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101538.k7AFcEeT012519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 11:28 EST ------- Oh: D. _smp_mflags I didn't try it. Now I added this and succeeded in building on 2.6.17-1.2157_FC5smp (_smp_mflags is -j3). This fix is included in 0.4.7-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:41:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101541.k7AFfe5k012736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-10 11:32 EST ------- Requested changes have been made to spec file. Looking back over the guidelines, there doesn't appear to be an explict dependency on a %check section. (Normally it's a good idea to have something of the form "%check\nmake test". See, e.g., almost any perl module package spec file.) As this package has no test suite, it doesn't make much sense for me to insist on it :) The package builds in mock(5/x86_64) after I added "BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils" to the spec. Add it and I'll approve... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:45:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101545.k7AFj0KQ012902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-08-10 11:35 EST ------- Please leave the FE-ACCEPT blocker... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 15:58:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101558.k7AFwYZw014095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-10 11:49 EST ------- Nuts. I meant to assign this to myself last night to review -- I figured I have a vested interest in it as a XFS fanboy since the first XFS-enabled RH 7.x "installer CD's" were out -- but Russell, are you sponsored? If not, then this bug needs to also block "FE-NEEDSPONSOR", and I can make comments but can't do the first binding review. It's also convention when making updates during a review to bump the release and spin a new srpm. Helps people make sure that we're all talking about the same package:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101609.k7AG9HNg015263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202032 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:09:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101609.k7AG9mE7015304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201170 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:12:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101612.k7AGCexc015545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |packages at amiga-hardware.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:16:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101616.k7AGGBiZ015939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-10 12:06 EST ------- > A patch is for Makefile.am. This is for removing sticky bit on /usr/bin/jfbterm > binary. So perhaps aclocal and so on is needed, I think. It would be better to patch Makefile.in instead if possible (I haven't looked at that precise example, but from your explanation it seems so). And, if possible, you could report upstream that making the setuid bit should be in a specific make target, or it should be checked the the user running make is root, since otherwise it prevents staged installs (like we do for rpms). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101643.k7AGhJcF017943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-10 12:33 EST ------- Ok, looks good now, all the rpmlint warnings can be ignored (gcc is speshul). Bill, tech ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:48:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101648.k7AGm2Y3018242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-10 12:38 EST ------- New srpm (ifac style isn't redistributable) http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/tetex-elsevier-0.1.20060416-3.src.rpm - don't ship the ifac style, it is not redistributable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:48:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101648.k7AGmv6O018338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-08-10 12:39 EST ------- Sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101653.k7AGrg7K018527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 12:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > It would be better to patch Makefile.in instead if possible (I > haven't looked at that precise example, but from your explanation > it seems so). Okay, another attempt to fix Makefile by patching against Makefile.in is done on http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/jfbterm-0.4.7-3.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jfbterm.spec This removed the necessity of automake, aclocal. Note: the previous spec file is preserved on http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jfbterm-0.4.7-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:55:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101655.k7AGtr9p018728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 12:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > The whole font section in %prep - is this actually required for building the > package? > In jfbterm-0.4.7-3, copying fonts section is moved after %{__make}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 16:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101656.k7AGuWO1018779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-10 12:46 EST ------- I've added it to dist-fc6, jakub does this need to be in comps somewhere? (which I would assume given the "it must be in core" attitude) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 17:13:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101713.k7AHDNrh019717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 ------- Additional Comments From ad+rh-bugzilla at uni-x.org 2006-08-10 13:03 EST ------- Thanks Paul! I removed the NEWS file from %docs and bumped release. The new SRPM URL: http://www.uni-x.org/review/mbuffer-20060728-2.src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.uni-x.org/review/mbuffer.spec Yes, I was sponsored last year by Warren and maintain 2 packages (keychain + pam_abl) in Extas. My FE mail address is different to my BZ account - please see the %changelog for the FE address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 17:34:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202033] Review Request: deltarpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101734.k7AHYB8I020830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deltarpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-10 13:24 EST ------- Good: + Tar ball matched with upstream. + Local Build works fine. + Local install works fine. + Local uninstall works fine. + License is OK. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Rpmlint on the source rpm complaints: W: deltarpm non-standard-group Applications/Utilitie s W: deltarpm setup-not-quiet - Rpmlint complaints on binary package: W: deltarpm non-standard-group Applications/Utilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 17:35:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101735.k7AHZ1ll020888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-10 13:25 EST ------- Looks like this review is going nowhere, so I'll close it soon unless somebody has something new to add. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 17:37:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101737.k7AHbdhk021130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 jakub at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat.com 2006-08-10 13:27 EST ------- Yes, Legacy software development. But that category will need some further editing (e.g. most of the compat-gcc-32-* subpackages are going away, compat-gcc doesn't exist for ages, etc.). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 17:37:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101737.k7AHbYwq021123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-10 13:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks Paul! I removed the NEWS file from %docs and bumped release. The new > > SRPM URL: http://www.uni-x.org/review/mbuffer-20060728-2.src.rpm > Spec URL: http://www.uni-x.org/review/mbuffer.spec OK, APPROVED. > Yes, I was sponsored last year by Warren and maintain 2 packages (keychain + > pam_abl) in Extas. My FE mail address is different to my BZ account - please see > the %changelog for the FE address. Hmm, I thought the FE and BZ addresses had to match or things got very confused. As long as you receive your bug reports it's OK though :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 17:47:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101747.k7AHl0gY021679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 13:37 EST ------- Add it to the devel package and it's good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 17:49:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101749.k7AHn29L021768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-08-10 13:39 EST ------- * rpmlint: no problems * Package named correctly: Yes * Patches named correctly: N/A * Spec file named correctly: Yes * Licence field matches: Yes * Licence file installed: No (OK but should query upstream) * Spec file in American English: Yes * Source matches upstream: Yes * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: Yes * Specfile legible: Yes * Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock: fc5/ppc) * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: Yes * Owns directories it creates: Yes * Duplicate files: No * Permission set correctly: Yes * Consistent macro use: Yes * %doc affects runtime: No * Headers and static libs in -devel: Yes * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: Yes * -devel requires base: Yes * Contains .la files: No * Owns files it didn't create: No * .desktop files installed correctly: N/A 1. As it needs allegro >= 4.2.0, i suggest putting a version dependency on allegro-devel for both the base and -devel packages 2. As faq.txt contains information exclusively of interest to developing/ building with alleggl I suggest moving it to -devel 3. readme.txt is primarily build instructions, I suggest excluding it. 4. In -devel, the *.hhk *.hhc and *.hhp files are Microsoft Windows HTML Help files if I remember right, probably of no interesting in Linux, I would exclude them. Otherwise it's cool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 18:03:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101803.k7AI30bR022588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-10 13:53 EST ------- Ok, patches welcome (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 18:15:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101815.k7AIFYLQ023380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-10 14:06 EST ------- The new packaging guidelines for python packages says that *.pyo files should include as normal files into the package. Therefor I have changed the packages: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/luma/luma-2.3-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 18:31:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101831.k7AIVVOV025109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-10 14:21 EST ------- I still dont get why this needs to be in core. it could live perfectly happy in extras. extras has a comps is installable at initial install time. is available in pirut. AFAICT the only reason any of the compat-gcc packages should be in core is if a package in core relies on it to build. otherwise they all should be moved to extras. living in Extras does not preclude it from being in RHEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 18:40:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101840.k7AIe9cs026217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 ------- Additional Comments From ad+rh-bugzilla at uni-x.org 2006-08-10 14:30 EST ------- Thanks Paul for the work and approval. I will ask at other place about the mail address. So far I am listed in the owners.list with my bugzilla address, and I am getting bug tickets about my packages properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 18:48:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101848.k7AImLBl028060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-08-10 14:38 EST ------- New version is available at: Spec URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion.spec SRPM URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion-1.99.8-1.src.rpm * Thu Aug 10 2006 David Necas (Yeti) - 1.99.8-1 - Changed `GNU GPL' to `GPL' to placate rpmlint - Fixed requirement of gtk2-devel 2.2 -> 2.6 in devel package - Removed python abi requirement as it is only needed in FC3- - Set plug-in permissions in the filesystem since they are not set in %%files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 18:59:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101859.k7AIxrK2029279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-08-10 14:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > The release has the following problems: > - aplus.el contains /usr/local/bin/a+ instead of /usr/bin/a+ This is not fixed. > - on startup of a+ > /usr/lib/idap.+: No such file or directory > somethere a path /usr/lib must be changed to /usr/lib/a+ Fixed. As to fonts: file /usr/share/fonts/apl is not owned by any package the x11 fonts should remain in /usr/share/X11/fonts, only the truetype fonts need to go to /usr/share/fonts. I propose the following: fonts-truetype-apl (is it really necessary to include this in the X11 font path?): /usr/share/fonts/apl /usr/share/fonts/apl/KAPL.TTF fonts-x11-apl: /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/fonts.alias /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/fonts.dir /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplcour-14.pcf.gz /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplgallant-19.pcf.gz /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplscreen-11.pcf.gz /usr/share/X11/fonts/apl/Kaplscreen-Bold-14.pcf.gz Please make sure that the correct files and also the directories are included in the files list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 19:25:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101925.k7AJP9Rr031272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 15:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133970) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133970&action=view) build log of efont-unicode-bdf in mock Build log of efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-1.fc5 in mock on fc5 system. rpmlint shows no errors. efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-1.fc5.noarch.rpm: efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-1.fc5.src.rpm: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 19:27:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101927.k7AJRvxe031547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 15:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=133971) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=133971&action=view) build log of jfbterm in mock Build log of jfbterm-0.4.7-3.fc5 in mock on fc5 system. Note that efont-unicode-bdf is installed from LOCAL. rpmlint shows no errors. jfbterm-0.4.7-3.fc5.i386.rpm: jfbterm-0.4.7-3.fc5.src.rpm: jfbterm-debuginfo-0.4.7-3.fc5.i386.rpm: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 19:35:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101935.k7AJZFsd032154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-08-10 15:25 EST ------- Hmm sorry I'n new to the whole review process so I'm not sure what it takes to be "sponsored", is there some info on this someplace. bump the release, ok will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 19:45:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608101945.k7AJjJb2000629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-10 15:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. As it needs allegro >= 4.2.0, i suggest putting a version dependency on > allegro-devel for both the base and -devel packages > I would rather not, tihs package is targeted soley at FC-5 and higher, so this is not nescesarry. Versioned dependencies IMHO only give a false sense of security, since often they are never updated after the initial specfile creation even if upstreams requirements change. > 2. As faq.txt contains information exclusively of interest to developing/ > building with alleggl I suggest moving it to -devel > I was thinking along the same lines when creating the package, but I wasn't sure since you agree I'll move it to devel. > 3. readme.txt is primarily build instructions, I suggest excluding it. > I was thinking along the same lines (again) when creating the package, but I wasn't sure since you agree I'll remove it. > 4. In -devel, the *.hhk *.hhc and *.hhp files are Microsoft Windows HTML Help > files if I remember right, probably of no interesting in Linux, I would > exclude them. Agreed, done. Thanks for the review!, new version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alleggl-0.4.0-0.4.rc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:10:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102010.k7AKA1cu002261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-10 16:00 EST ------- the .la files here should be ok as-is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102010.k7AKAT3o002312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 16:01 EST ------- With the change to the spec and the explanations here (and on IRC), I'm happy. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:11:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102011.k7AKBsul002411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-10 16:02 EST ------- Not sure why you're removing lib*.so, but I'm sure you have a good reason. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:15:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102015.k7AKFOjh002651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-10 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > With the change to the spec and the explanations here (and on IRC), I'm happy. > > APPROVED Thanks! (In reply to comment #16) > Not sure why you're removing lib*.so, but I'm sure you have a good reason. (: The .la files which are used / openened by pinball refer to the .so.x files, not to the .so ones, so for loading the plugins they are not nescesarry, since these .so files are plugins and libs they are not meant to be linked against either, so the .so files aren't nescesarry for that either. Thus they are completly unused, hence I remove them. I must say I didn't look what other ltdl using packages do with the .so files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:15:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102015.k7AKFx9x002713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-08-10 16:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Any signs of the update? I am waiting for confirmation on a patch and will re-submit once I have it. Should be any day now. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102030.k7AKUvEe004082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-08-10 16:21 EST ------- > I would rather not, tihs package is targeted soley at FC-5 and higher, so this > is not nescesarry. Versioned dependencies IMHO only give a false sense of > security, since often they are never updated after the initial specfile > creation > even if upstreams requirements change. No problem. I prefer versioned dependencies if the source makes a specific request for a version but for different reasons :) Looks good Hans, Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:37:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102037.k7AKbBI6004564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 16:27 EST ------- %post umask 133 mkfontdir %{fontdir} && /usr/sbin/chkfontpath -q -a %{fontdir} fc-cache 2>/dev/null %postun fc-cache 2>/dev/null Okay, there needs to be some wrappers around this you need something like %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/mkfontdir ]; then if [ - x %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath ]; then %{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{fontdir} && %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath -q -a %{fontdir} fi fi if [-x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache 2>/dev/null fi %postun if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [-x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache 2>/dev/null fi fi Also, why are you using umask? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:45:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102045.k7AKjcPQ004957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-10 16:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Hmm sorry I'n new to the whole review process so I'm not sure what > it takes to be "sponsored", is there some info on this someplace. The process of becoming a Fedora Extras Contributor is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors You've already done much of what's described there. There's more information on getting sponsored linked from there too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:49:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102049.k7AKnYbk005290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-10 16:40 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: widelands description-line-too-long Your objective is not to send hordes of warriors to destroy a enemy, but to build a strong economy. E: widelands description-line-too-long Your objective is not to send hordes of warriors to destroy a enemy, but to build a strong economy. W: widelands no-documentation E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/empire/buildings/lumberjack/CVS/Root E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/worlds/greenland/bobs/tree1/CVS/Repository E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/barbarians/buildings/tavern/CVS/Tag E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/barbarians/buildings/deep_oremine/CVS/Entries E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/worlds/blackland/bobs/pebble6/CVS/Root E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/worlds/greenland/bobs/tree1/CVS/Tag E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/barbarians/buildings/warmill/CVS/Repository And then tons more og the "version-control-internal-file" errors. These must all be fixed. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissible content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * .desktop file as required and properly installed MUST FIX: ========= * During build desktop-file-install gives this message: widelands.desktop: missing encoding (guessed UTF-8) * rpmlint output: E: widelands description-line-too-long Your objective is not to send hordes of warriors to destroy a enemy, but to build a strong economy. E: widelands description-line-too-long Your objective is not to send hordes of warriors to destroy a enemy, but to build a strong economy. W: widelands no-documentation E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/empire/buildings/lumberjack/CVS/Root E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/worlds/greenland/bobs/tree1/CVS/Repository E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/barbarians/buildings/tavern/CVS/Tag E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/barbarians/buildings/deep_oremine/CVS/Entries E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/worlds/blackland/bobs/pebble6/CVS/Root E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/worlds/greenland/bobs/tree1/CVS/Tag E: widelands version-control-internal-file /usr/share/widelands/tribes/barbarians/buildings/warmill/CVS/Repository And then tons more og the "version-control-internal-file" errors. These must all be fixed. Hint for the version-control-internal-file" errors do a rm -fr `find -name CVS` on your CVS co before creating the tarbal, this way you get a substantial smaller tarbal too. * Drop the "A Settlers II OpenSource clone. " from the summary, this may be inspired by Settlers II bu advertising it as a clone is asking for legal trouble. * As already said don't put the desktop file into a tarbal, just refer to it directly. Also don't copy it to the build-dir instead just refer to it as %{SOURCE1} in the desktop-file-install command. * Remove the bogus "#make %{?_smp_mflags}" line from the spec, this package uses sconstruct, so that line makes no sense at all. * There ARE usuable docs, for example the COPYING file and probably others too. * Please add an icon file according to the freedesktop.org icon standard, it should go under: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps Where 32x32 is the size of the icon, please do ls /usr/share/icons/hicolor/ to see the available valid sizes, if the icon doesn't match any pick the closest. * Once the icon is in the proper place you must add %post(un) script to update the icon-cache see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d * RPM_OPT_FLAGS do not get used during the build, good luck with fixing this as this can be a bitch with SConstruct builds, let me know if you need any help with this. Questions ========= * Why the build=debug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:50:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102050.k7AKo0h4005386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-10 16:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Hmm sorry I'n new to the whole review process so I'm not sure what > it takes to be "sponsored", is there some info on this someplace. Basically, sponsorship is just a way for people with established track records in the Extras community (sponsors) to mentor new packagers. It's designed to both educate (sponsoree) and ensure responsibility (sponsor). There are a couple good pages in the wiki about this: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored The second would seem to be on point here... Also, is it just me or should this spec have a buildrequires of ncurses-devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 20:51:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201178] Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102051.k7AKpNES005568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinball - Emilia Pinball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201178 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-10 16:41 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:03:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102103.k7AL3Qpr006323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 16:54 EST ------- Well, A: %Requires(post) requires xorg-x11-font-utils, /usr/sbin/chkfontpath, fontconfig. Then, the check for existence of binary is already done by this, I think? B. The usage of "umask 133" was borrowed from fonts-japanese. This is because mkfontdir creates fonts.dir in the directory in which fonts are installed (in this case, /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc ). This is to ensure that fonts.dir should be 0644 permission. (There may be the case that a people like me install rpm as a normal user by sudo, whose umask has 0077. In this case, fonts.dir cannot be read by another normal user.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201198] Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102109.k7AL9HGw006728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleggl - OpenGL support library for Allegro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201198 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-10 16:59 EST ------- Thanks! Imported & build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:13:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102113.k7ALDb6n007143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 17:04 EST ------- A. I'd still want to see the wrapper and in any case, it needs to be %{_sbindir} B. No. If you want to ensure the correct permission, use chmod. In anycase, mkfontdir should be setting the permission correctly on creation. If it isn't, you need to bugzilla it as it is a problem. The use of umask is discouraged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102116.k7ALGir7007617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 17:07 EST ------- %{_datadir}/papyrus-0.2.3/demo/ Who owns %{_datadir}/papyrus-0.2.3? Change to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ and all should be happy :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:42:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102142.k7ALgoxv015159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual Alias: php-manual-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-08-10 17:33 EST ------- -rpmlint output clean -package named according to Package Naming Guidelines -spec file name matches package %{name} -package licensed with open-source compatible license O I could not find the license file in the package or on the web site. Please let me know where I can find the upstream license -license file not included in %doc -spec file written in American English -spec file legible -source matches upstream a8ef43e9ff1da2ce18df90e67fc5758f php_manual_en.tar.gz -package successfully compiles and builds on FC-5 x86_64 -package does not need any BuildRequires -spec file does not contain any locales -package does not contain any shared libraries -package is not relocatable -package owns all directories it creates -package does not contain any duplicate files in %files -file permissions set properly -package contains proper %clean section -macro usage is consistent -package contains permissible content -use of -doc subpackage does not make sense in this context since package is already a doc package -package does not include %doc -package does not include header files or static libraries -package does not use pkgconfig -package does not contain any .so files -package does not build a -devel subpackage -package does not contain any .la files -package is not a GUI needing a .desktop file -package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - Explain where documentation is licensed ==== SHOULD ==== - include a license file and place it in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:47:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102147.k7ALlcnK016832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 17:38 EST ------- Builds fine in mock, but rpmlint on the main installed package is coming up with a pile of warnings along the lines of W: papyrus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libpapyrusgtk.so.0.0.0 _ZTIN7Papyrus6MarkerE The others are clean rpm -qa --requires is not showing any missing Rs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:48:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102148.k7ALmuIK017167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 17:39 EST ------- Okay, from that I checked for xorg-x11-fonts-base, umask treatment seems no necesarry, removing. The updated spec and srpm are: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-2.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 21:52:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102152.k7ALqPZW017963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 17:43 EST ------- #15 : any sign of the update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 22:03:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102203.k7AM3N0Z020747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-10 17:53 EST ------- I know this has sat around for too long, but the end is in sight. The packaging committee accepted the PHP guideline draft, although honestly it didn't say much about extensions like this one. In any case, I'm ready to move forward with this review. The first problem is that it doesn't build; I had to add a BR: on pkgconfig. Previously you indicated that this wasn't required, but it certainly is a problem. Perhaps the new minimal buildroots have changed things since you were able to build without the BR. rpmlint finds this in SRPM: W: php-shout macro-in-%changelog buildroot You just need to double a percent sign somewhere. and in the built RPM: E: php-shout script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/php-shout-0.3.1/TODO E: php-shout script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/php-shout-0.3.1/README These are executable for some reason, and shouldn't be. E: php-shout-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/phpShout-0.3.1/php_shout.h E: php-shout-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/phpShout-0.3.1/php_shout.c These source files are executable, and should be chmodded in %prep. The final set of macros which were chosen: %global php_apiver %((echo 0; php -i 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/^PHP API => //p') | tail -1) %global php_extdir %(php-config --extension-dir 2>/dev/null || echo "undefined") Care to fix things up to use those? Finally, I can't fetch the upstream source from the given URL. The only thing that seems to be available is 0.3a. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 22:08:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102208.k7AM8beV021301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-10 17:59 EST ------- mkfontdir %{fontdir} && %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath -q -a %{fontdir} You need to be consistent. This should be %{_bindir}/mkfontdir %files %{fontdir}/* Should just be %{fontdir}/ %build gzip -9 $g To use this you need to include BR gzip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 22:22:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102222.k7AMM0Ke022545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 18:12 EST ------- > (In reply to comment #6) > mkfontdir %{fontdir} && %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath -q -a %{fontdir} > > You need to be consistent. This should be Oops! Again updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 23:07:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102307.k7AN7duq026951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-10 18:58 EST ------- Note: (In reply to comment #6) > Should just be > %{fontdir}/ > To use this you need to include BR gzip These are also fixed in 0.4.2-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 23:13:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102313.k7AND09o027376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-08-10 19:03 EST ------- Fixed it: Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/gnome-phone-manager-0.7-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 10 23:46:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608102346.k7ANkeGt030218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-10 19:37 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 00:21:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110021.k7B0LcSj031437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://gentoo- | |wiki.com/HOWTO_hfsplus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 00:42:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201806] Review Request: mbuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110042.k7B0g3NT032649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mbuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201806 alex at dalloz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alex at dalloz.de 2006-08-10 20:32 EST ------- Though not a requirement, I changed my bugzilla email address to prevent any future confusion. The devel branch build properly, so I am closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 01:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110110.k7B1AgJc001770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-10 21:00 EST ------- Let's try to make some forward progress here, since this is blocking a whole pile of PHP modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 01:18:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110118.k7B1IurE002247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 02:24:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110224.k7B2OZwc005290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-10 22:15 EST ------- There's not much to this package; upstream doesn't distribute this as anything other than a bunch of separate files. However, one things that concerns me is the files are essentially unversioned upstream. One thing you might consider doing is preserving the original file dates, but that might be difficult when fixing up the line endings. Also, why do you have BuildRequires: tetex-latex? It doesn't seem to be required for anything since you're just copying files around. Otherwise rpmlint is quiet and everything looks good. * source files match upstream: bb7c3602a593e7801068a0f4e3ac794e elsart1p.cls 2708bc993954490cb837de6a50548adc elsart3p.cls 06e26323c76bcfac2186918a050e84a2 elsart5p.cls 42609cbfaf1af3a660af564dbab9d42c elsart.cls 9205bf5292356dd1f0c924de61bc8dda elsart-harv.bst d94d325492f5efdb522bc1b966338ffd elsart-num.bst 0c563cda4d6a90aed64b1842cd1a3cc1 instructions-harv.pdf d705c36eed9d254a25749bbf76e32a8f instructions-num.pdf cc0c1c70f26472955aeb9e278e230858 template-harv.tex aa0283ae870ebb69c2dee52eb3881b58 template-num.tex * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. ? BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: tetex-elsevier = 0.1.20060416-3.fc6 = /usr/bin/texhash tetex-latex * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets look OK. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. (Actually the documentation is several times larger than the rest of the package, but the whole thing is only 500K.) * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 02:39:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110239.k7B2dNhU005944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Bug 201481 depends on bug 201480, which changed state. Bug 201480 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 02:56:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110256.k7B2u9qq006412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-10 22:46 EST ------- Looks like all of the dependencies for this are in; this builds fine and rpmlint has no complaints. * source files match upstream: f52377ecdeb19055ae64037fb1ef530e DateTime-Format-MySQL-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is not necessary) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Format::MySQL) = 0.04 perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL = 0.04-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DateTime) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=46, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.27 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.34 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 02:57:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110257.k7B2vcD5006478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 03:09:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110309.k7B393Md006899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 03:55:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200597] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110355.k7B3t0EL008281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200597 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 04:16:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201481] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110416.k7B4GG9k008839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201481 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-11 00:06 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 04:21:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200597] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110421.k7B4LdQT009026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200597 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-11 00:12 EST ------- This builds and installs fine; the provided example file runs fine. The only rpmlint issue is: W: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/TrayIcon/Install/trayicon-autogen.h which is normal for arch-specific Perl modules. * source files match upstream: 4c627fd00cc316ac018732e7739a5c4f Gtk2-TrayIcon-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignorable errors. * final provides and requires are sane: TrayIcon.so()(64bit) perl(Gtk2::TrayIcon) = 0.03 perl(Gtk2::TrayIcon::Install::Files) perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon = 0.03-1.fc6 = libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Gtk2) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present but necessarily disabled. It does run manually. * shared libraries are present, but internal to Perl. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * the single header file is internal to Perl. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 04:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110424.k7B4O8LB009149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net 2006-08-11 00:14 EST ------- I'm taking a quick trip this weekend (Six Flags wooo!), and will get to these after the weekend! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 04:34:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200597] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110434.k7B4YXYo009542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200597 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-11 00:24 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC4, FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 04:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110459.k7B4xDAj010244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-11 00:49 EST ------- This builds fine; rpmlint just has this to say: W: php-pecl-xdebug setup-not-quiet which is no big deal but it's true that there's little point in showing the full tar output when unpacking the source. Pass "-q" to %setup to quiet both tar and rpmlint. We settled on the following macro definitions: %global php_apiver %((echo 0; php -i 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/^PHP API => //p') | tail -1) %global php_extdir %(php-config --extension-dir 2>/dev/null || echo "undefined") can you switch things over to using those? I'm not sure it's a good idea to require a minimum php-api; you'd almost certainly require a rebuild if the API changes, so wouldn't you need to require a specific php-api? Also, there's not much point in requiring a specific PHP version as even FC1 had PHP 4.3.4; you have to go back to RH9 to find something older. Other than those bits, everything looks pretty good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 05:01:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110501.k7B51vHT010309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-11 00:52 EST ------- MUST: ===== O rpmlint output is: W: palantir hardcoded-packager-tag Tim W: palantir redundant-prefix-tag W: palantir setup-not-quiet W: palantir mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs These all must be fixed * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * "Compiles" and builds on FC-5 i386 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no .desktop file required MUST fix ======== * rpmlint output: W: palantir hardcoded-packager-tag Tim Remove the packager tag W: palantir redundant-prefix-tag Remove the prefix tag W: palantir setup-not-quiet Add -q to %setup W: palantir mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Only uses spaces for indenting, not tabs * Add: "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" to the subpackages %files . * Source0 must be a full URL Questions: ========== * I assume the java client doesn't build with gcj? Have you tried? * Why is the building of the QT client optional and not done by default, since it is in a subpackage the user can always choose to not install it so I would prefer to always build it and atleast build it by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 05:11:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110511.k7B5BPRZ010684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-11 01:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > A new package is available at > http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.2-2.src.rpm > (the spec is available at > http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/NetworkManager-openvpn.spec > now). Cleaned up and incorporated most suggestions. > > Upstream: It's from the 0.6 branch (0.6.4 tag) from CVS. The more recent > versions are incompatible because the VPN DBUS API has changed. > There are no tarballs, source is only available in CVS, thus no URL tag for now. > > Four warnings remain: > W: NetworkManager-openvpn no-url-tag > explained above > Okay, please add a comment above source0 with the bash commands which can be used to recreate the tarbal (I know the tarbal might not be the same because CVS has chanced, but thats ok). > W: NetworkManager-openvpn conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/NetworkManager/VPN/nm-openvpn-service.name > W: NetworkManager-openvpn conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-openvpn-service.conf > > These are directly relevant to a functioning service and should not be modified, > thus I did not add noreplace (for if the files have to change during an > upgrade). If it is policy to add noreplace anyway I can easily do this but from > my understanding this is just error prone. > OK > W: NetworkManager-openvpn devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/libnm-openvpn-properties.so > > This is needed, it contains the GUI for configuring the VPN and is called from > inside NM (to be more precise: nm-vpn-properties). > OK > The find_lang has been removed for now. It should be used for i18n support but > only threw errors so I commented it out. > OK TODO: -Add an URL tag (see previous comments by others) -Add comments to Source0 to explain how the tarbal was created -Remove this as its probably no longer needed: "rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib*.a", if it is still needed then the --disable-static %configure argument isn't working and should be removed -Remove these 2 lines: Requires(post): %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache Requires(postun): %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache These are not needed / unwanted, the scrip checks for existence of this file before using it and if its not there there is no reason to call it. Once these are done (assuming you agree with the proposed changes) I'll approve this and sponsor you. Feel free to create an account in the account system / request FE membership if you alreadty have one, then I can approve and sponsor in one go. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 05:31:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110531.k7B5VgsE011392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-11 01:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > One problem remains to be discussed: > E: asuka incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ircd > W: asuka incoherent-init-script-name ircd > > As we see these both point to the same: name incoherency. As you can see the > binary is called ircd. So it is expected to be _the_ ircd on a system. The > reason for these names of the files is that the package contains the undernet > irc daemon with a specific Asuka patchset from Quakenet (which assumes > exclusiveness on the machine). > > I saw that there is an ircd-hybrid in extras. It contains the very same files > (everything just named ircd). So we have two options: > * it may be an option to rename the package to ircd-asuka and rename the other > files (and the user) appropriately. This should make it easy to distuinguish the > packages and install them side-by-side. > * Another way is to make the packages conflict. This makes sense since in > general you do not want two ircds on your system that you can confuse... > > So this decision has to be made now. I'd vote for the latter way since this is > closer to what a asuka-user is known. I agree that this should be decided upon before this package gets included into FE. But I'm not sure if I'm the one who should make this descission. I think it would be best to discuss this on the fedora-extras-list. I personally would prefer renaming the binary and init script instead of using a Conflicts, a user should be able to install both if he wants to toy around. If he then tries to start them both at the same port the latest one will fail, which is kinda what he is asking for when doing things like that. Also I believe that there is an unwritten policy that Conflicts should never be used within FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 06:39:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110639.k7B6dbbh014086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-11 02:30 EST ------- I think it might be worth getting together with the other ircd maintainer(s) in Extras and working out how to use the "alternatives" system for ircd, much like is done in Core for MTAs like sendmail, postfix etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 06:45:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110645.k7B6ju9d014364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-11 02:36 EST ------- SPEC: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d.spec SRPM: http://www.poolshark.org/src/k3d-0.5.16.0-3.src.rpm Paul, thanks for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 07:21:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 03:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110721.k7B7LL9D015649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-11 03:11 EST ------- Thanks for making the addition APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 07:37:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 03:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110737.k7B7bves017232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-08-11 03:28 EST ------- 1) I read the steps about "Import of complete src.rpm packages" (it's my case), so I ask you to check how I want to proceed: * My package is named ss5 (ss5-3.5.9-1.src.rpm) and is under Devel/FC-4/Fc-5 branch; * I am releasing new version of ss5 (ss5-3.6.1-1.src.rpm), so: export CVSROOT=:ext:USERNAME at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras export CVS_RSH=ssh cvs co ss5 cd ss5/devel cd ss5/common a ... b ./cvs-import.sh -b -m "ss5 updated to 3.6.1-1" ~/rpmbuild/SRPM/ss5- 3.6.1-1.src.rpm c cd ../FC-5 d cvs up e make build ... (steps a,b,c,d,e also for FC-4 branch) 2) About logo, I read guidelines and I wrote to mailbox to requests usage permission. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 07:50:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 03:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110750.k7B7owoI018682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual Alias: php-manual-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-08-11 03:41 EST ------- copyright.html describes the distribution license opl.license.html and linked pages are the license itself I'd be tempted to symlink these into %{doc}, except that they are generated HTML pages that would have broken links out of context. How does creating a "placeholder" LICENSE file in %{doc} that says "For licensing information please see %{defaultdocdir}/php-manual/en/copyright.html" sound? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 09:02:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 05:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608110902.k7B92Tx0024353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-11 04:53 EST ------- Built :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 10:37:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 06:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111037.k7BAbbDT028659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-08-11 06:28 EST ------- About the "build=debug" this is needed to enforce a build with "-g", otherwise the package is not built with debugging info and the -debuginfo package starts crying. I am not currently on Fedora (I like KDE best, and the RH artwork loooks ugly on it), but I'm configuring the system to receive RPM builds. When I'm done with this, I will rebuild the package. While I don't finish it, I'll only update the spec file. I'm looking forward to UnleashKDE's approval :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 13:07:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111307.k7BD7fIv004636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-11 08:58 EST ------- With the new src.rpm the timestamps are kept for the source files (normally I try to always keep the timestamps, and I used them to construct the version, although I made a mistake on the month). I also keep the timestamp for the installed files. The result is a spec which is rather verbose since I don't know how to preserve the creation date when copying a file. install -p and cp -p don't keep it. Tell me if you prefer that I remove those changes. - keep files timestamps, even for installed files - remove unneeded tetex-latex BuildRequires - correct the version by using the right month from the file timestamps http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/tetex-elsevier-0.1.20060516-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 13:09:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111309.k7BD9w5I004726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 jmp at safe.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-11 09:00 EST ------- Version 2.1-186 SPECS file fine tuning, logs are not in /usr/share/clement anymore Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-186.spec SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-186.src.rpm Beside SPEC file fine tuning, numeros improvement and bug-fix since 2.1-176, see Changelog within SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 16:00:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111600.k7BG0KYA018869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-11 11:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > With the new src.rpm the timestamps are kept for the source files > (normally I try to always keep the timestamps, and I used them > to construct the version, although I made a mistake on the month). Ah, I was wondering where that version came from, since it didn't match the dates on the files. > I also keep the timestamp for the installed files. The result is > a spec which is rather verbose since I don't know how to preserve > the creation date when copying a file. install -p and cp -p don't > keep it. How odd, cp -p should work and in fact it does seem to work for me; I commented out the touch statements in %install and built in mock and the resulting package had Apr 12 and May 16 for the .bst and .cls files, respectively. Even the .pdf files in %doc came out correctly. I then commented out the first touch staement in %prep and things were still OK. However, even with an unmodified spec, the .tex files still came out with the build time. Perhaps it would be best just to leave things alone since they really are being modified. > Tell me if you prefer that I remove those changes. I think it's useful to try and preserve the timestamps as possible, but just using cp -p seems to work fine for me so the extra work seems unnecessary. I wonder why you're seeing different behavior? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 16:32:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111632.k7BGWFBY021111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-08-11 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > #15 : any sign of the update? Not yet. I will work on it today and have it ready by Monday. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 16:58:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202220] New: Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{, x} Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202220 Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{,x} Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: jakub at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://devserv/~jakub/compat/compat-gcc-295.spec SRPM URL: http://devserv/~jakub/compat/compat-gcc-295-2.95.3-82.src.rpm Description: IBM asked again for s390{,x} 2.95.3 libstdc++. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 17:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202220] Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{, x} In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111709.k7BH9igo024095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{,x} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202220 jakub at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Red Hat Enterprise Linux | |Beta Version|devel |5.0.0 Component|Package Review |Package Review OtherBugsDependingO| |202216 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 17:16:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111716.k7BHG4xp024725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 ------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net 2006-08-11 13:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-shout.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-shout-0.3.1-5.src.rpm Okay I did find some time to update the package with these fixes. The reason I removed pkgconfig is that it was decided that libshout-devel would already require pkgconfig (and I still think it should...), but you're right... I tried it in mock and it fails without pkgconfig. You should also be able to find the 0.3.1 sources on SourceForge now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 17:23:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202220] Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{, x} In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111723.k7BHNCpV025386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{,x} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202220 ezannoni at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |196083 nThis| | Flag| |rhel-5.0.0+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 17:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] New: Review Request: libtirpc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 Summary: Review Request: libtirpc Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: steved at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/tirpc/lib/libtirpc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/tirpc/lib/libtirpc-0.1.7-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: This package contains SunLib's implementation of transport-independent RPC (TI-RPC) documentation. This library forms a piece of the base of Open Network Computing (ONC), and is derived directly from the Solaris 2.3 source. This package also support RPC over IPv6 which will be needed for all the RPC applications to support IPv6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 17:55:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111755.k7BHtlHN027638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 ------- Additional Comments From alan at redhat.com 2006-08-11 13:45 EST ------- I'd second that - why does this need to be in core ? What package in core requires it to build ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 18:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111801.k7BI1Mk7028074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529 work.eric at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 18:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111807.k7BI7qcB028590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-08-11 13:58 EST ------- What's going to use it initially? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 18:34:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111834.k7BIY0Ox031385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-11 14:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.36.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Aug 11 2006 Alain Portal 2.36.0-1 - Update to 2.36.0 * Fri Aug 11 2006 Alain Portal 2.35.0-1 - Update to 2.35.0 * Thu Aug 10 2006 Alain Portal 2.34.0-2 - New mansupfr.tar.bz2 tarball : alsa-utils, man, nano and shadow-utils man pages are no more in this tarball, so, no need to remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 18:39:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202236] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202236 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-SSLify/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SSLify-0.04-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SSLify.spec Description: This component represents the standard way to do SSL in POE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 18:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202236] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111839.k7BIdhxv032113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202236 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 18:58:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608111858.k7BIwkV5001544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-11 14:49 EST ------- rpcbind which will replace portmapper. I'm currently working on the rpcbind rpm now, but I need the libtirpc lib in place to move forward. Once these two rpms are in place, I can start moving forward on porting all the RPC applications (yp*,nfs*, etc) to the new library resulting in making them IPv6 aware... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 20:28:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608112028.k7BKS4D1008069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr CC|gauret at free.fr | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-08-11 16:18 EST ------- Needs work: * The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install * It doesn't look like the build uses the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * The spec files has a mixed use of spaces and tabs * Directory /usr/lib/helix/ is unowned * The desktop file should be installed with desktop-file-install and with the vendor prefix set to "fedora" (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain X-Fedora (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * The translation files are not properly tagged. Use the %find_lang macro (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post and postun, since you install icons to %_datadir/icons/hicolor. (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 21:10:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608112110.k7BLAA6h010630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-08-11 17:00 EST ------- SPEC: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat.spec SRPM: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/dstat-0.6.3-5.src.rpm I fixed the above mentioned things. rpmlint is clean on both the srpm and the binary rpm. I don't know how much time I'll have to review another project however. Plus I'm not sure I have the expertise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 21:27:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608112127.k7BLRF3V011648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-11 17:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > I wonder why you're seeing different behavior? Because I did testing stupidly. I didn't used cp -p for the first cp when testing. Now it should work, and I also fixed the .tex timestamps. http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/tetex-elsevier-0.1.20060516-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 22:42:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608112242.k7BMgPVu014177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-11 18:32 EST ------- I still don't know if this supports IPV6. I'm having a heck of a time getting ipv6 running on my test system. This latest package removes all %ghost lines per the recent Packaging committee decision to not %ghost .pyo files. I know this hasn't been ratified by FESCo/FC groups yet, but I'm hopeful that it will be. This also cleans up some of the semanage issues reported earlier, so there should be no more error/warning messages when installing/uninstalling on a system that isn't running selinux. There should also not be any more problems turning selinux off and on and having the port context get set correctly. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis-0.5.8-5.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 22:55:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608112255.k7BMtXYS014493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Alias: conexusmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-11 18:45 EST ------- * /usr/share/conexusmm-0.2.0/ is not included. * Only other issue I see is not a packaging problem, but a run-time problem: The demo is in $PATH, but it doesn't look in its datadir for the source code files. Gives ugly warnings in a terminal and an incomplete demonstration. As I believe you can fix those things: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 11 23:50:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608112350.k7BNonTa016002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-08-11 19:41 EST ------- Imported and built successfully into devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 00:33:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120033.k7C0X2R3017257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841, 197974 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-11 20:23 EST ------- You might even trace the pkgconfig problem further back; libshout-devel depends on libogg-devel, which also has a .pc file but no pkgconfig dependency. It seems there's bustage all around. I filed a bug against libogg-devel so there's a chance of this getting fixed in the future, but of course you have to target existing releases and so keeping the pkgconfig dependency here is the right thing to do. In any case, things look much better now; rpmlint is quiet and I can grab the upstream source. The only thing I notice, which I'm not too clear on, is your requirement of a minimum php-api version. Shouldn't this be a requirement of a specific php-api version (i.e. "=" instead of ">=")? I'll wager that you know more about PHP APIs than I do, so I'll leave it to you to decide what's best here. Well, there is one tiny thing. Your most recent changelog line is dated Jun 30 instead of Aug 11. You can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: 3a630c1953e0bd0c42a3324f5e449077 phpShout-0.3.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(php-shout) = 0.3.1-5.fc6 shout.so()(64bit) php-shout = 0.3.1-5.fc6 = config(php-shout) = 0.3.1-5.fc6 libogg.so.0()(64bit) libshout.so.3()(64bit) libspeex.so.1()(64bit) libtheora.so.0()(64bit) libvorbis.so.0()(64bit) php-api >= 20041225 * %check is present and the included test seems to pass. * shared libraries are present, internal to PHP. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED. Go ahead and apply for cvsextras membership (and fedorabugs if you want it). I'll set you up and then you can check in and request your builds. Let me know if you need any help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 00:33:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120033.k7C0XUE8017325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|181445 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 00:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202236] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120037.k7C0bnYD017516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202236 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 01:01:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120101.k7C11gCm018051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-08-11 20:52 EST ------- OK, I suppose. Would have really liked to have had this for feature freeze. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 01:58:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120158.k7C1w1FE019232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-08-11 21:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I'd second that - why does this need to be in core ? What package in core > requires it to build ? I'll second that second :). I also see no reason why this needs to be in core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 02:54:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202236] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120254.k7C2sLbk020309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202236 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-11 22:44 EST ------- Not much to say; builds fine and rpmlint is quiet. * source files match upstream: 8c3a9c5d538453105e20b2a3a0fce183 POE-Component-SSLify-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::SSLify) = 0.04 perl(POE::Component::SSLify::ClientHandle) = 0.02 perl(POE::Component::SSLify::ServerHandle) = 0.02 perl-POE-Component-SSLify = 0.04-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(Net::SSLeay) perl(POE) perl(POSIX) perl(Symbol) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests (test?) pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.05 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 05:48:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 01:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120548.k7C5mFPj023595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-12 01:38 EST ------- Almost there, why are these: %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_usr}/bin/%{name} %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ %attr(-,mail,mail) ? Perhaps the binary is suid? In that case please reflect that in the %attr, even if it already is made suid in %install. And I see no reason for the %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} being mail.mail, prhaps this is a leftover from when it contained the log files? I also found some more should fixes, I see you use: %{_usr}/bin in various places, you should replace that with %{_bindir} also you use %{_usr}/lib, which will result in things getting installed under /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64 on 64 bit archs, is that intentional? If not please replace it with %{_libdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 08:24:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120824.k7C8Owqm029279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-08-12 04:15 EST ------- Well I removed openssh in br :) New Spec : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm.spec Nex SRPM : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm-1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 08:31:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176580] Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608120831.k7C8V8sq029638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-08-12 04:21 EST ------- thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 13:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121311.k7CDBSWo006592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-12 09:01 EST ------- We need to be consistent here: rpmlint is complaining about putting an application in setuid how could you suggest to do this? Clement is started un root priviledges and lets them go as soon proper port (SMTP) are open, to do this it seteuid with the application program ownership. So there is NO purpose to put clement setuid, not from the security stand point, not from the rpmlint stand point, not from application stand point. file in %{_usr}/lib are shell for clement application (utilities, support), shell are not archs dependent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 15:26:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121526.k7CFQCsY009593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-12 11:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.37.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Aug 12 2006 Alain Portal 2.37.0-1 - Update to 2.37.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 16:45:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196570] Review Request: mirage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121645.k7CGj2KM011436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196570 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-12 12:35 EST ------- Hey Michael. I would be happy to formally review this. Before I do: Are the links in comment #2 current? Or did you make changes in comment #4 that aren't reflected yet in the spec? Also, it looks like moving forward the python guidelines are going to change to require .pyo files to just be included instead of ghosting them. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00018.html Can you make that change as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 17:54:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121754.k7CHsWOD012868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-12 13:44 EST ------- Greetings. Here's a review: OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 578208faf944100a233ae216fa230350 clusterssh-3.19.1.tar.gz 578208faf944100a233ae216fa230350 clusterssh-3.19.1.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage. n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage. n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} n/a - .la files are removed. See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. (fc6/i386) OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. Issues: 1. The Source0 line doesn't work for me. I guess the osdl mirror doesn't have a copy of this source. http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/clusterssh/clusterssh- 3.19.1.tar.gz worked ok for me. 2. You need to run desktop-file-install in %install for your .desktop file. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop 3. Might include the "THANKS" file as a %doc? 4. Why do you have the: Requires: perl-Tk perl-X11-Protocol rpm picks up those requirements just fine without help. You should remove those Requires unless there is some reason I don't see why they are there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 17:59:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202236] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121759.k7CHxh7J013038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SSLify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202236 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-12 13:50 EST ------- I like it when there's not much to say :) +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 18:04:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121804.k7CI4LAv013138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-12 13:54 EST ------- I'd really like to see nqc in FE. If there's no interest or time to move this forward, I'll offer to adopt it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 18:54:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202317] New: Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202317 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-File-HomeDir.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-File-HomeDir-0.58-1.src.rpm Description: File::HomeDir is a module for dealing with issues relating to the location of directories for various purposes that are "owned" by a user, and to solve these problems consistently across a wide variety of platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 18:57:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193108] Review Request: libsexymm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121857.k7CIvIQH016229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsexymm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193108 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-12 14:47 EST ------- Greetings. Here's a review: OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: cb01af4595000d9e192f5d9fcff5b742 libsexymm-0.1.7.tar.gz cb01af4595000d9e192f5d9fcff5b742 libsexymm-0.1.7.tar.gz.1 See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch See below - BuildRequires correct n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See Below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. See Below - Should build in mock. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. Issues: 1. The COPYING file included is the GPL, not the LGPL that this package is distributed under. Perhaps ping upstream to include the correct license file? 2. Doesn't build under mock for me, I get: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lxml2 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[5]: *** [libsexymm.la] Error 1 Possibly missing BuildRequires: libxml2-devel? With that added it builds. 3. Are these Requires in the main package needed: Requires: gtkmm24 Requires: libsexy >= 0.1.7 and in the devel package: Requires: gtkmm24-devel 4. rpmlint says: W: libsexymm one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: libsexymm one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig Suggest: Might change your post and postun to just do -p /sbin/ldconfig E: libsexymm-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These should be under /usr/include and /usr/share? /usr/lib/libsexymm/include /usr/lib/libsexymm/include/libsexymmconfig.h /usr/lib/libsexymm/proc /usr/lib/libsexymm/proc/m4 /usr/lib/libsexymm/proc/m4/convert.m4 /usr/lib/libsexymm/proc/m4/convert_libsexymm.m4 W: libsexymm-devel no-documentation This one can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 18:58:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202317] Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121858.k7CIwwuu016318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202317 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-08-12 14:49 EST ------- Note: This module is new requirement of perl-AppConfig (version 1.63). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 19:02:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121902.k7CJ2OXB016405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 ------- Additional Comments From nomis80 at nomis80.org 2006-08-12 14:52 EST ------- Go ahead and adopt it. I've got no time now and in the foreseable future to work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 19:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121903.k7CJ3UxA016429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-12 14:54 EST ------- I can't find your email as a member of the cvsextras group, so it looks like you need to be sponsored. Here are some links to read about becoming sponsored and contributing to fedora extras: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 19:05:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202318] New: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202318 Summary: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Scalar-Properties.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Scalar-Properties-0.12-1.src.rpm Description: Scalar::Properties attempts to make Perl more object-oriented by taking an idea from Ruby: Everything you manipulate is an object, and the results of those manipulations are objects themselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 19:08:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202319] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202319 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Data-Compare.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Data-Compare-0.13-1.src.rpm Description: This module compares arbitrary data structures to see if they are copies of each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 19:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202319] Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121909.k7CJ923c016686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202319 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202318 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 19:09:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202318] Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608121909.k7CJ9Nma016700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202318 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202319 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 21:06:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202324] New: Review Request: nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc - Nagios SNMP plugins to monitor remote disk and processes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202324 Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc - Nagios SNMP plugins to monitor remote disk and processes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: These plugins allow you to monitor disk space and running processes on a remote machine via SNMP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 22:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202220] Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{, x} In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608122212.k7CMCUYF020622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{,x} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202220 riek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |urgent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 12 22:38:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608122238.k7CMcNIl021229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 18:28 EST ------- Rick, go ahead and make a new submission for your package. You can close this as a duplicate of the new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 00:12:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] New: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/jetty5.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/jetty5-5.1.11-0.rc0.4jpp.src.rpm Description: Jetty is a 100% Java HTTP Server and Servlet Container. This means that you do not need to configure and run a separate web server (like Apache) in order to use java, servlets and JSPs to generate dynamic content. Jetty is a fully featured web server for static and dynamic content. Unlike separate server/container solutions, this means that your web server and web application run in the same process, without interconnection overheads and complications. Furthermore, as a pure java component, Jetty can be simply included in your application for demonstration, distribution or deployment. Jetty is available on all Java supported platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 00:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130038.k7D0ctWJ023695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 20:29 EST ------- I'll go ahead and take a look at this. It builds fine in mock; rpmlint on the SRPM has this to say: W: abook macro-in-%changelog rlz1 W: abook macro-in-%changelog rlz1 W: abook macro-in-%changelog rlz1 W: abook macro-in-%changelog rlz1 W: abook macro-in-%changelog rlz1 You just need to double some percent signs. E: abook no-cleaning-of-buildroot You should clean out $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install. rpmlint on the built RPM is quiet. * source files match upstream: 87d25df96864a7c507a4965e6d1da49d abook-0.5.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints * final provides and requires are sane: abook = 0.5.6-1.fc6 = libncursesw.so.5()(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) lynx * %check is not present; no test suite upstream * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. * locale files present; fing_lang used appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 01:18:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201417] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130118.k7D1In7a024470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201417 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-12 21:09 EST ------- Starting alleyop and exiting via menu "File > Quit" gives a backtrace and a hanging main window: $ alleyoop *** glibc detected *** alleyoop: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08106000 * ** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6[0x6472b7] /lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x78)[0x64a7ac] /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0(poptFreeContext+0x266)[0xdf07d6] /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0[0x247f8c9] /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_unref+0x16c)[0x95d24c] /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0[0x247d5e4] /lib/libc.so.6(exit+0xe6)[0x60e65e] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4)[0x5f921c] alleyoop[0x804d231] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 01:43:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130143.k7D1htRQ025116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 21:34 EST ------- Is the package back in comment #1 the one that should be reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 02:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130223.k7D2N6Qe025791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 22:13 EST ------- Well, the python guidelines have been changed to get rid of the "ghost the .pyo files" bit. So your files section should shrink a bit. (In any case, you didn't ghost the .pyo files in the contrib directory.) This builds fine in mock; rpmlint has the following to say about the SRPM: W: buildbot mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs You use spaces everywhere except for Patch0: and BuildArch:. Not a really big deal. There are many subdirectories under python_sitelyb/buildbot that you don't own. Getting rid of the %ghost bits should fix this as well. There's something that looks like a test suite in buildbot/test. Is this something that could be run at package build time? Should it really be included with the installed package? Review: * source files match upstream: 7be16fe13f173e46df711ed51648e750 buildbot-0.7.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: buildbot = 0.7.3-3.fc6 = /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.4 python-cvstoys python-twisted >= 1.3.0 ? %check is not present but there might be a test suite. * package is not relocatable. X owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 02:53:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130253.k7D2rkBC026476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 22:44 EST ------- It's been some months now with no reviewer input. I propose that we invoke the stalled review policy and assign this back to the phantom address so that someone else can have a go at it. I'll do this in a week unless the assignee indicates otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 03:11:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202317] Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130311.k7D3BZH7026817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202317 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 23:01 EST ------- Boring easy Perl module review follows: * source files match upstream: 295ee8b4f580bea5fa5714cdf8ac965b File-HomeDir-0.58.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(File::HomeDir) = 0.58 perl(File::HomeDir::Darwin) = 0.58 perl(File::HomeDir::MacOS9) = 0.58 perl(File::HomeDir::TIE) perl(File::HomeDir::Unix) = 0.58 perl(File::HomeDir::Windows) = 0.58 perl-File-HomeDir = 0.58-1.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(File::Spec) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 4 subtests skipped. Files=3, Tests=35, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.14 CPU) (the skipped dests are meaningless except on Windows) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 03:19:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187236] Review Request: smixer - A simple interface to /dev/mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130319.k7D3J412027008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smixer - A simple interface to /dev/mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187236 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 23:09 EST ------- So what's up here? Does this still need a review or should it be dropped? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 03:35:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130335.k7D3Z1Gl027369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-12 23:25 EST ------- Is Steve back in action? The python guidelines were changed to remove the recommendation that the .pyo files be ghosted, so that's good. The package still builds fine and the only rpmlint issue is: W: sos setup-not-quiet which can be eliminated by adding "-q" to the %setup line. Not a big deal at all. Is there a proper upstream source or URL for this package now? Regarding sponsorship, lately I've been sponsoring Red Hat folks with just a single package submittion if they've responded quickly to comments. I know everyone's busy with FC6 and RHEL5 at the moment, but let's see how it goes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 03:37:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130337.k7D3bfRr027560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 04:12:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130412.k7D4CdHr028210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-13 00:03 EST ------- This failed to build for me: + chmod a+x bootstrap acinclude.m4 src/update + ./bootstrap ./bootstrap: line 43: libtoolize: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76866 (%build) Looks like a BuildRequires: libtool is needed. Also, I note that the naming guidelines require that a SVN checkout be dated instead of using the revision number, but I'm not sure that requirement makes much sense. Is there a reason why you disabled parallel make? If so, you should note that in the spec. (This takes ages to build single-threaded.) Ah, the build just failed again: ++ -O2 -ffast-math -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DCB_PRECOMP -Winvalid-pch -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/codeblocks app.o appglobals.o compilersettingsdlg.o crashhandler.o dlgabout.o dlgaboutplugin.o environmentsettingsdlg.o main.o prefix.o printdlg.o scriptconsole.o splashscreen.o startherepage.o -pthread -L/builddir/build/BUILD/codeblocks/src/src/wxAUI /builddir/build/BUILD/codeblocks/src/src/wxAUI/.libs/libwxaui.a -L/builddir/build/BUILD/codeblocks/src/sdk /builddir/build/BUILD/codeblocks/src/sdk/.libs/libcodeblocks.so -lwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6 -lwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6 -lwx_gtk2u_html-2.6 -lwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6 -lwx_gtk2u_core-2.6 -lwx_baseu_xml-2.6 -lwx_baseu_net-2.6 -lwx_baseu-2.6 -lpthread -ldl -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create_for_bitmap' /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create' /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_set_size' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [codeblocks] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/codeblocks/src/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/codeblocks/src/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/codeblocks/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.41997 (%build) Not sure what to do at this point. Perhaps a missing BR: on some X or cairo library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 04:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130433.k7D4Xlda028663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-13 00:24 EST ------- This package looks good and builds and runs fine, but you seem to leave out the documentation and the examples, save for COPYING and READ.ME. It looks liks stuff manually copied into _docdir doesn't get added to the package, yet you can't manually list _docdir in %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 05:06:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130506.k7D56DOq029385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-13 00:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This failed to build for me: > > + chmod a+x bootstrap acinclude.m4 src/update > + ./bootstrap "chmod a+x"'ing acinclude.m4 doesn't make any sense. acinclude.m4's are not executable. They are source files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 07:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130740.k7D7e6Ab000437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-13 03:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This failed to build for me: > > + chmod a+x bootstrap acinclude.m4 src/update > + ./bootstrap > ./bootstrap: line 43: libtoolize: command not found > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76866 (%build) > > Looks like a BuildRequires: libtool is needed. OK, BR for all autotools are needed :-) > > Also, I note that the naming guidelines require that a SVN checkout be dated > instead of using the revision number, but I'm not sure that requirement makes > much sense. I think that for SVN repos there should be possible to use revision number. With CVS there is no such possibility so the dates must be used. It makes also possible to track the official "nightly build" which use revision numbers. > Is there a reason why you disabled parallel make? If so, you should note that > in the spec. (This takes ages to build single-threaded.) It is only an omission from some bug hunting. > Ah, the build just failed again: > > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to > `cairo_xlib_surface_create_for_bitmap' > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create' > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_set_size' > > Not sure what to do at this point. Perhaps a missing BR: on some X or cairo > library? I have no idea too, all required libraries should be taken to the linker via wxWidgets libraries. Is this from x86_64 rawhide? How much up-to-date was the rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 07:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130742.k7D7gRhT000563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-13 03:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > + chmod a+x bootstrap acinclude.m4 src/update > > + ./bootstrap > > "chmod a+x"'ing acinclude.m4 doesn't make any sense. > > acinclude.m4's are not executable. They are source files. Cut'n'paste from upstream, fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 07:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130750.k7D7ovQi001013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-13 03:41 EST ------- > > Ah, the build just failed again: > > > > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to > > `cairo_xlib_surface_create_for_bitmap' > > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create' > > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to > `cairo_xlib_surface_set_size' > > > > Not sure what to do at this point. Perhaps a missing BR: on some X or cairo > > library? > > I have no idea too, all required libraries should be taken to the linker via > wxWidgets libraries. Is this from x86_64 rawhide? How much up-to-date was the > rawhide? It builds clean on rawhide from 20060810 on i386, now I am updating my build system and will try it later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 09:34:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608130934.k7D9YrPc023175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-13 05:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > Ah, the build just failed again: > > > > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to > > `cairo_xlib_surface_create_for_bitmap' > > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create' > > /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to > `cairo_xlib_surface_set_size' > > > > Not sure what to do at this point. Perhaps a missing BR: on some X or cairo > > library? > > I have no idea too, all required libraries should be taken to the linker via > wxWidgets libraries. Is this from x86_64 rawhide? How much up-to-date was the > rawhide? No linking problem on just updated rawhide, so it could be a x86_64 problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 10:50:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 06:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131050.k7DAoVhn026093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-13 06:41 EST ------- > I think that for SVN repos there should be possible to use > revision number. With CVS there is no such possibility so the > dates must be used. Not true. Surely you could check out from CVS using a branch tag or revision. Please use the date for SVN checks, too, and optionally put the revision number at the right. Like: codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn.src.rpm or: codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn2824.src.rpm or: codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060803cvs.src.rpm There is no necessity to squeeze SVN revision numbers or CVS tags/revs into the package Release. Instead, add a comment in your spec on how to check out the included source code. The most interesting information about pre-releases is the date, which is independent from whether the source is maintained in SVN or CVS or a different VCS. Further info: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 11:16:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131116.k7DBGubw027022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-13 07:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > I think that for SVN repos there should be possible to use > > revision number. With CVS there is no such possibility so the > > dates must be used. > > Not true. Surely you could check out from CVS using a branch tag > or revision. I meant situation between tagged revisions as the tags in CVS are not usually created after every commited change. > > Please use the date for SVN checks, too, and optionally put the > revision number at the right. Like: > > codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn.src.rpm > or: > codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn2824.src.rpm OK, I will use the above (date + rev) > or: > codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060803cvs.src.rpm > > There is no necessity to squeeze SVN revision numbers or CVS tags/revs > into the package Release. Instead, add a comment in your spec on how > to check out the included source code. > > The most interesting information about pre-releases is the date, which > is independent from whether the source is maintained in SVN or CVS or > a different VCS. Using the date versus revision depends on the the style of upstream development. And I see using the revisions useful as the revision is exact identification of the development state and should be visible. When placed in the spec file, it would be hidden from most users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 11:50:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202317] Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131150.k7DBoU3E028030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202317 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-08-13 07:40 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for development. Pending FC-5 branch creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 13:18:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131318.k7DDInXC029968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-13 09:09 EST ------- * error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/fmio-wrapper.pyc /usr/bin/fmio-wrapper.pyo * Run "rpmlint" on the binary rpms. * The setuid program is unacceptable. * Sub-packages ought to require full %{version}-%{release} of the main packages to stay in sync with them (in particular since the shared lib does not have a proper soname). * %defattr missing for all packages. * Couldn't get any good results with or without the "bktr" driver, so I think this software is not ready yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 16:21:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] New: Review Request: terminus-font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 Summary: Review Request: terminus-font Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://n-dimensional.de/software/terminus-font/terminus-font.spec SRPM URL: http://n-dimensional.de/software/terminus-font/terminus-font-4.20-3.src.rpm Description: Clean fixed width font The Terminus Font is designed for long (8 and more hours per day) work with computers. Version 4.16 contains 690 characters, covering code pages ISO8859-1/2/5/9/13/15/16, IBM-437/852/855/866, KOI8-R/U/E/F, Windows-1250/1251/1252/1254/1257, Paratype-PT154/PT254, Bulgarian-MIK, Macintosh-Ukrainian, Esperanto and many others (a total of about 110 language sets). Also included are the IBM VGA, vt100 and xterm pseudographic characters. The sizes present are 6x12, 8x14, 8x16, 10x20, 12x24, 14x28 and 16x32. The styles are normal and bold (except for 6x12), plus EGA/VGA-bold for 8x14 and 8x16. The font is available for the Linux console and for X11. This is my first package for Fedora, so I'm going to need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 16:22:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131622.k7DGMavo003052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 16:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131623.k7DGNmvv003144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 16:32:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131632.k7DGWcYc003524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-08-13 12:23 EST ------- * Sun Aug 13 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.1.23-0 - updated to 0.1.1.23 http://ensc.de/fedora/tor/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 16:36:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131636.k7DGanAB003674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2006-08-13 12:27 EST ------- A few notes on the package: * rpmlint reports no problems. * The package name is derived from the upstream tarball name "terminus-font". However, there is no binary package "terminus-font", only the two subpackages "terminus-font-console" and "terminus-font-x11". * The spec file hopefully meets the Packaging Guidelines. There are no specific Packaging Guidelines for fonts, therefore a little guesswork and copying from other packages had to happen. * The font is licensed under the GPL. * It builds with mock for FC5 and FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 19:46:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131946.k7DJk82P011136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-13 15:36 EST ------- I'm getting a build failure in development: g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -o lostirc main.o MainWindow.o MainNotebook.o Tab.o Prefs.o ServerWindow.o GuiCommands.o Entry.o StatusBar.o TextWidget.o NickList.o DCCList.o ../libirc/libirc.a -L/lib64 -lgtkmm-2.4 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdkmm-2.4 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -latkmm-1.6 -latk-1.0 -lpangomm-1.4 -lglibmm-2.4 -lpango-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create_for_bitmap' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_create' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `cairo_xlib_surface_set_size' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status This is the second build failure I've had like this today; I think my tree is busted. It builds fine on FC5. I'm seeing two .desktop files installed: fedora-listirc.desktop and lostirc.desktop. It looks like the package installs its own desktop file and then the second one gets installed when you call desktop-file-install. I guess you'll need to delete lostirc.desktop. * source files match upstream: 501cd56bc0740d599540fb415718b939 lostirc-0.4.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: lostirc = 0.4.6-2.fc5 = /bin/sh libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libatkmm-1.6.so.1()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangomm-1.4.so.1()(64bit) libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual testing shows that the package runs fine. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets present are OK (gtk-update-icon-cache * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. X problems with desktop file installation. * locale files installed; %find_lang called properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 19:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608131947.k7DJlilF011321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-13 15:38 EST ------- I cannot fetch the spec from the above URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 20:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608132001.k7DK1MJj011577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-13 15:51 EST ------- Everything looks fine to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 21:19:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608132119.k7DLJnKm014066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-13 17:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > We need to be consistent here: > rpmlint is complaining about putting an application in setuid how could > you suggest to do this? > Clement is started un root priviledges and lets them go as soon > proper port (SMTP) are open, to do this it seteuid with the application program > ownership. So there is NO purpose to put clement setuid, not from the > security stand point, not from the rpmlint stand point, not from application > stand point. > I think you understood me wrong here, I didn't want to suggest to make %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_usr}/bin/%{name} setuid, I thought it was setuid and that was why it has owner and group mail, if its not setuid, then why not just owner and group root? > file in %{_usr}/lib are shell for clement application (utilities, support), > shell are not archs dependent. > OK. You still haven't explained why you do: %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ Instead of just: %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ Or is that just a copy and paste error and will you fix that with the next version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 21:22:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608132122.k7DLMTCp014118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-13 17:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/brandy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/brandy-1.0.19-2.src.rpm Fixes docdir problem and examples problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 22:24:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] New: Review Request: openwebmail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 Summary: Review Request: openwebmail Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/openwebmail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/openwebmail-2.52-1.src.rpm Description: OpenWebmail is an open source webmail system which is designed to replace Outlook (which face it, isn't hard!), but also offer spam filtering, out of office notices and everything else you'd expect from a fully-fledged webmail system Note for reviewers : due to a large number of permission issues with this package, I've fixed the permissions and repackaged. This was also required in order to get it to install correctly (and create sane directories under BUILD. The tarball is tar.bz2 and not .gz - I don't therefore expect the md5sums to be the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 22:40:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608132240.k7DMeHDR016021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-13 18:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Note for reviewers : due to a large number of permission issues with this package, I've fixed the permissions and repackaged. IMHO, this is not good solution. I think it will be better if you report these issues to upstream and upstream will fix it. Also, you can include patch to fix these issues. IMHO, that's better than repackaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 23:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608132306.k7DN6nbK016532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: terminus- |Review Request: terminus- |font |font - Clean fixed width | |font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 23:16:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608132316.k7DNGnt8016699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-13 19:07 EST ------- I think datadir is not a problem, I need to double check with the PHP person, should be fixed in the next version. clement is not 'setuid' but must be root open < 1024 port. such the Clement daemon is started as root and clement take the application ownership to become a standard user mail to avoid the have a daemon with root priviledge open on the (wild) outside. I would rather have a "clement" username but rpmlint seems to be rather reluctant to 'give/declare' new username. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 13 23:59:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608132359.k7DNxwJP017654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-13 19:50 EST ------- The repackaging is for two purposes 1. To install into BUILD so that it actually works (the original spec installed directly into /var) 2. The permissions I've sent the changes upstream but haven't had a reply yet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 01:12:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] New: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gnome2-GConf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.032-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-GConf.spec Description: This module allows you to use the GConf configuration system in order to store/retrieve the configuration of an application. The GConf system is a powerful configuration manager based on a user daemon that handles a set of key and value pairs, and notifies any changes of the value to every program that monitors those keys. GConf is used by GNOME 2.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 01:12:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140112.k7E1Cp7g019566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 01:57:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202384] New: Review Request: dates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 Summary: Review Request: dates Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/dates/dates.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/dates/dates-0.1-1.20060813svn.src.rpm Description: Dates is a small, lightweight calendar that uses Evolution Data Server as a backend. Dates features an innovative, unified, zooming view and is designed for use on primarily hand-held devices. It features both a ?vanilla? GTK user interface and tailored support for the Nokia 770 maemo interface. rpmlint complains about mixed tabs and spaces, but I'm having a hard time finding that. Also, no docs for -devel but I think thats ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 02:15:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202384] Review Request: dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140215.k7E2FiCM021205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-13 22:06 EST ------- When using dates, I discovered that it cannot display recurring events. I've filed a bug upstream: http://bugzilla.o-hand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 03:38:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140338.k7E3cNkc023769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-13 23:28 EST ------- Given that -fPIC is being passed let's ignore shlib-with-non-pic-code. A couple things yet to address: Needs work: - Fix the cp line in %install to a %doc macro or explain why it's needed. - missing smp flags or a note on why not needed (was in 0.1.2-2 ?) Recommend: * Changing URL to http://www.gnome.org/projects/devtools/gnomebuild.shtml Good: + license (GPL) + sources good + builds on devel x86_64 + %find_lang macro + version-release good, is latest + macros used consistently + proper -devel subpackage + %clean good + ldconfig good + proper file ownership + proper permissions + removed .la files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 03:44:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140344.k7E3icP9023876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-13 23:34 EST ------- ok quick thing drop the define addreq and just put your requires in a Requires line you do realise you dont have to have them all on one line? do not hard code .fc5 in release use %{?dist} is there any reason you are not using %{?_smp_mflags} with make you really should just call make not %{__make} drop --program-prefix=%{?_program_prefix} from %configure your not using it at all you really should not add all the Requires unless they are only needed at run time. if they please state so. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires you dont need to require gcc http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList dont use %makeinstall http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 I would write the spec file more like attached spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 03:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140346.k7E3kCCl024000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-13 23:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134115) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134115&action=view) corrected spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 04:02:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140402.k7E426i9024387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bruno.cornec at hp.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-13 23:52 EST ------- remove the %post section. You cant have that kind of output you have binary statically linked files that you don't build this is very bad as one you shouldn't have anything statically linked, it should not be prebuilt, extras packages support multiple arches those files will not run on ppc or sparc for instance. they will run on x86_64 but 64 bit binaries are preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 05:05:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202398] New: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398 Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/python-musicbrainz2-0.3.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/python-musicbrainz2-0.3.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The package python-musicbrainz2 is a client library written in python, which provides easy object oriented access to the MusicBrainz Database using the XMLWebService. It has been written from scratch and uses a different model than PythonMusicbrainz, the first generation python bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 05:13:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140513.k7E5DVwt026036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-14 01:04 EST ------- Needs work: - Run rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT right after %install like the templates - Need smp flags or comments why not Good: + version-release + file permissions good + file ownership good + license (GPL) + sources match -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 06:02:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140602.k7E624SQ027245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-14 01:52 EST ------- Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.src.rpm Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec Changes: - added autotools to BR - changed Release per NamingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 06:19:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201489] Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140619.k7E6JMAL027747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreeTDS - libraries for MS SQL and Sybase databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201489 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-08-14 02:09 EST ------- Added info the above page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 06:21:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202384] Review Request: dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140621.k7E6LM4U027801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-08-14 02:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Also, no docs for -devel but I think thats ignorable. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to simply add the COPYING file to %doc in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 07:44:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: FE-NEEDSPONSOR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140744.k7E7i5YC031095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FE-NEEDSPONSOR Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: | |FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 07:46:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140746.k7E7klaG031291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |FE-NEEDSPONSOR | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 07:50:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140750.k7E7oOiZ031660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-14 03:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > I think datadir is not a problem, I need to double check with the PHP person, > should be fixed in the next version. > > clement is not 'setuid' but must be root open < 1024 port. > such the Clement daemon is started as root and clement take > the application ownership to become a standard user mail > to avoid the have a daemon with root priviledge open on the > (wild) outside. I understand, but then the %{_usr}/bin/%{name} file doesn't have the be owned by mail.mail and could be just root.root, right? My real question al allong has been why is %{_usr}/bin/%{name} owned by mail.mail? > I would rather have a "clement" username but > rpmlint seems to be rather reluctant to 'give/declare' new > username. > Thats possible, add the following lines (at the appropiate places): Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd, /usr/sbin/groupadd %pre /usr/sbin/groupadd -r clement 2> /dev/null || : /usr/sbin/useradd -s /sbin/nologin -M -d / -c "Clement daemon" -r -g clement \ clement 2> /dev/null || : And then you can use %attr (-,clement,clement) in %files. You will ofcourse also need to patch the daemon to drop its root rights to the user clement instead of mail. This might generatre some rpmlint warnings but these may be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 07:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140751.k7E7phSs031772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-14 03:42 EST ------- Sorry, wrong permissons. Now I've fixed their. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 08:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 04:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140821.k7E8L4Q9001793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-14 04:11 EST ------- Hello. ======================================================= I cannot sponsor you formally because I do not have a member of sponsors. You may ask someone to review you on fedora-extras mailing list, for example. ======================================================= However, I do a kind of pre-review of your package. Note: my review cannot be a formal review. First, please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines . Then: * rpmlint is not silent. Fix below unless you have a opinion not to do so. gcin-1.2.1-2.i386.rpm: W: gcin summary-not-capitalized gcin - Chinese input method server W: gcin no-version-in-last-changelog W: gcin no-soname /usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so E: gcin script-without-shellbang /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/gcin W: gcin devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/gcin-im-client.h gcin-1.2.1-2.src.rpm: W: gcin summary-not-capitalized gcin - Chinese input method server E: gcin unknown-key GPG#476a8659 W: gcin hardcoded-packager-tag Chung-Yen W: gcin setup-not-quiet E: gcin use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR W: gcin mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs gcin-debuginfo-1.2.1-2.i386.rpm: W: gcin-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog * This package doesn't be rebuilt in mock. Check the missing BuildRequires. In mock, this build of this package shows: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gcin-1.2.1' gcc -o gcin gcin.o eve.o win0.o pho.o tsin.o win1.o util.o pho-util.o gcin-conf.o tsin-util.o win-sym.o intcode.o pho-sy m.o win-int.o win-pho.o gcin-settings.o table-update.o win-gtab.o gtab.o gtab-util.o phrase.o win-inmd-switch.o pho-dbg.o locale.o win-pho-near.o gcin-switch.o win-status.o IC.o IMdkit/lib/libXimd.a im-srv/im-srv.a -lXtst -L/lib -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgli b-2.0 -L/usr/X11R6/lib /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXtst collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake[2]: *** [gcin] Error 1 * Commands needed for %post and so on which are in the paths normal users don't use (such as /usr/sbin) must be used with full path. * Why does this package have the definition of %prefix or %Docdir ? I strongly suspect this is not necessary. Especially, unless you have a reason that this package can be relocatable, removing %prefix is necessary. * Check files which this package should have. I suspect that this package should own %{_datadir}/gcin/ . * Check %Require. Is a explicit requirement of gtk2 is necessary? * Don't use Packager. Fedora buildsys overrides it. * The format of BuildRoot is not preferred. Especially, why use %{_builddir}, not %{_tmppath}? * Perhaps the description of Group is not proper. * Using of %makeinstall is now discouraged. * debuginfo rpm includes no files. Perhaps binaries in this package is stripped in build or install stages, which is incorrect and needs fixing. * Use macro, instead of using /etc and so on. * Don't use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR, use %SOURCE?? so that we can check where the sources is used easier. * Specify the location of %Source0 by URL, not by only the filename. Note: I didn't check this package by using this. I only checked packaging issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 08:39:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 04:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140839.k7E8duNe003369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-14 04:30 EST ------- Oops!! debuginfo includes some files, however, apparantly it is not sufficient. Anyway, check where binaries are stripped in build or install stages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 08:43:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 04:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140843.k7E8hC3Z003560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 08:47:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 04:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608140847.k7E8lvtf003882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 10:49:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141049.k7EAnCDo011113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 06:39 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.3-8.src.rpm Fixes #23 Added pkgconfig as a R for the -devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 11:34:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141134.k7EBYm2r013747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-14 07:25 EST ------- Re comment #1 and #2 You *really* should use pristine/upstream sources and patch/fix them instead, else a reviewer cannot (reasonably) confirm that they match upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 11:40:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141140.k7EBeQBF014073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 07:30 EST ------- Fair comment. I'll see what I can respin. Still no reply from upstream on the fixes submitted though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:06:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202384] Review Request: dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141206.k7EC6UT0015268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-14 07:57 EST ------- COPYING is already in the main package, and the devel package requires the main package. Putting it in the devel package seems silly to me, and just fiddling to make rpmlint happy on a warning. If there are ever any development docs I'll add them to the devel package, but for now there are hardly _ANY_ docs to speak of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:14:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141214.k7ECE82b015683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-14 08:04 EST ------- Seems I do not explain myself right... %{_usr}/bin/%{name} MUST be own by 'somebody' else than root to have clement to know, once started, under which ID it must run (the application look about the file ownership and say 'ok lets seteuid to this'), if the application is not setuid the only other way is to hard code the effective uid, this is not good from my stand point. I choosed 'mail' because this ID is used by related application. I want to give possibility to change this on the fly by local sysadmin. useradd and groupadd clement where part of the original implementation but removed to comply to rpmlint. If rpmlint is a reference tools to 'the right way to do something' warning can't ignore. IMHO rpmlint warning are 'you are doing something which can work but are against established standard'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:15:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202423] New: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/trackballs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/trackballs-1.1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Trackballs is a game in which you steer a marble ball through tracks of varying difficulty. The game features 3D graphics, an integerated level editor and high quality soundeffects and background music. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:16:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] New: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/trackballs-music.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/trackballs-music-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Some great music to listen to while playing Trackballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:17:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141217.k7ECHUJ3016025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:17:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202423] Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141217.k7ECHfNx016041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202424 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:24:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141224.k7ECOXWk016430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-14 08:14 EST ------- > I choosed 'mail' because this ID is used by related application. This asks for a very close look. Either it is a necessity, by design, that the program must run as "mail". Or it is a fault, and it runs with a shared uid/gid it should not have access to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:28:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141228.k7ECSFpe016702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-14 08:18 EST ------- This review appears to be stalled, with no response from the submitter for over a month. Please provide an update soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:51:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141251.k7ECpeYG018291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-14 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > > I choosed 'mail' because this ID is used by related application. > > This asks for a very close look. Either it is a necessity, by design, > that the program must run as "mail". Or it is a fault, and it runs with > a shared uid/gid it should not have access to. > OK.... lets resolv the equation 1) the application must not run as root 2) rpmlint complain if you add/create a user 3) We should not use an existing user -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:52:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141252.k7ECqsYC018356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-14 08:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Seems I do not explain myself right... > %{_usr}/bin/%{name} MUST be own by 'somebody' else than root to have clement to > know, once started, under which ID it must run (the application look about > the file ownership and say 'ok lets seteuid to this'), if the application > is not setuid the only other way is to hard code the effective uid, this is > not good from my stand point. I choosed 'mail' because this ID is used by > related application. I want to give possibility to change this on the fly > by local sysadmin. > I understand. > useradd and groupadd clement where part of the original implementation but > removed to comply to rpmlint. > If rpmlint is a reference tools to 'the right way to do something' warning > can't ignore. IMHO rpmlint warning are 'you are doing something which can work > but are against established standard'. No, a rpmlint warning means you shouldnot be doing this unless you've got a good reason, and it this case we have a good reason so using user and groupadd is ok. (In reply to comment #19) > > I choosed 'mail' because this ID is used by related application. > > This asks for a very close look. Either it is a necessity, by design, > that the program must run as "mail". Or it is a fault, and it runs with > a shared uid/gid it should not have access to. > If I understand jmp correctly its the latter (a fault) jmp if you think it is better to have it run as clement, feel free to add the user, in exceptional cases (which daemons always are) you can ignore the relevant rpmlint warnings, thats why they are warnings, rpmlint deliberatly has 2 levels of compaining, warn and error, and these are only warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 13:01:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141301.k7ED1W3l018867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-14 08:52 EST ------- Correct, I was building FC6 on FC5. I notice MySQL is enabled, but configure also looked for Postgre. Would this be something you would want to --enable but not Require? You'll also want zabbix-web to Require php-mysql Please substitute the references to /var with %{_localstatedir} in your sed scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 13:29:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202384] Review Request: dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141329.k7EDT0PX020618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 13:35:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141335.k7EDZ5lr021016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2006-08-14 09:25 EST ------- I'm here. I'll make the setup quiet, and I'm also ready to deliver a new release that fixes a couple of minor problems. I'll roll that today or tonight and make it available. The project is hosted at sos.108.redhat.com, and that is the upstream. I'll also make sure that's reflected in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 13:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141350.k7EDoK5O021975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-14 09:40 EST ------- > 2) rpmlint complain if you add/create a user Hmm? The "dangerous-command-in" _warning_ about userdel/groupdel? This is misinformation. Surely there are valid cases when creating a new user or group is required/justified. Similarly, there are cases when deleting a user or group during package removal can be done, i.e. if no files owned by that uid/gid are left anywhere. In particular, since you want a "centralized quarantine area" (quote), you need a special uid/gid and not use an existing uid/gid which is shared with other programs/services. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:02:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141402.k7EE2OCL022895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-14 09:52 EST ------- Building with mock on both FC5 and FC6 I still get checking history... ERROR: cannot determine hash mode of /var/lib/news/history Try running makehistory first. Adding --without-history to configure does make it build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141406.k7EE64pC023184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-14 09:56 EST ------- My newest srpm is in comment #16. Paul, would you check it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:06:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141406.k7EE6E04023196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-14 09:56 EST ------- My newest srpm is in comment #7. Paul, would you check it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:12:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141412.k7EEChkV023518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-08-14 10:03 EST ------- It's been a month over the last response from anyone. Can anyone take a look at this? It seems the earlier RPM issues are resolved and it would be nice if someone could confirm packaging issues are ok so I we can go forward with the next steps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:14:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] New: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/perl-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/perl-SDL-1.20.3-8.src.rpm Description: SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer) bindings for the perl language. --- Notice that this package comes from the repo that must be named, where it used to live because it depends on smpeg which contains patented code, however it can be build without smpeg support too and currently the packages using it don't need the smpeg part. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:15:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141415.k7EEFRvk023780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-14 10:05 EST ------- So I added clement as group & user as suggested. got this from rpmlint (many lines of this kind) E: clement non-standard-gid /var/spool/clement-2.1/mqueue clement A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users Does not look like as a 'Warning' to me, how to make it as a Warning? Also got this warning W: clement dangerous-command-in-%preun userdel because I would like to delete created user when removing all the application, there is a kind of ambiguity here as some file could be left if the application was in production previously. My understanding of the last Michael comment is to let the sys-admin delete the remaining user/group himself, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:24:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] New: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble-1.0.0-6.src.rpm Description: Full-featured, colorful animated penguin eyecandy, 100 levels of 1p game, hours and hours of 2p game, 3 professional quality 20-channels musics, 15 stereo sound effects, 7 unique graphical transition effects and a level editor. You need this game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:28:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141428.k7EESiVI024665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-14 10:19 EST ------- > E: clement non-standard-gid /var/spool/clement-2.1/mqueue clement Who cares? This is not the first package that creates a new user/group. > My understanding of the last Michael comment is to let the sys-admin > delete the remaining user/group himself, right? Yes. If package removal does not get rid of all files owned by that user/group, the next package might allocate the same uid/gid and give some other software access to the old files, which are still left on the file-system as orphans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:31:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166205] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141431.k7EEVk84024855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166205 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-14 10:21 EST ------- OK. the new review request is bug 201417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:49:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141449.k7EEnMDT025893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-14 10:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > > E: clement non-standard-gid /var/spool/clement-2.1/mqueue clement > > Who cares? This is not the first package that creates a new user/group. Me!. Agree this is not the first package creating a user/group.... problem, if rpmlint is THE reference and rpmlint is reporting error how can I make the difference between real error which are errors from simple advice... now in my case there is 48 "errors" which are 'who cares',.... hmmmm...... > > > My understanding of the last Michael comment is to let the sys-admin > > delete the remaining user/group himself, right? > > Yes. If package removal does not get rid of all files owned by that > user/group, the next package might allocate the same uid/gid and give > some other software access to the old files, which are still left > on the file-system as orphans. OK, lets keep the user/group then > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:50:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166205] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141450.k7EEo96f025967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166205 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-14 10:40 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 201417 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201417] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141450.k7EEoAHn025979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201417 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-14 10:40 EST ------- *** Bug 166205 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:58:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141458.k7EEw4fo026683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-14 10:48 EST ------- A bit late due to a bugzilla collision, but I fully agree with Michael: (In reply to comment #23) > So I added clement as group & user as suggested. > > got this from rpmlint (many lines of this kind) > > E: clement non-standard-gid /var/spool/clement-2.1/mqueue clement > A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. > Standard groups are: > root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, > news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users > > > Does not look like as a 'Warning' to me, how to make it as a Warning? > Erm, so its an error (my mistake), still it can be ignored, rpmlint us an automated validation tool and sometimes it can be just plain wrong. Trust me (and Michael) on this between the 2 of us there is a ton of packaging experience. > > Also got this warning > W: clement dangerous-command-in-%preun userdel > because I would like to delete created user when removing all the application, > there is a kind of ambiguity here as some file could be left if the application > was in production previously. > My understanding of the last Michael comment is to let the sys-admin delete > the remaining user/group himself, right? Yes, you should not remove the user, the user may only be removed if your 100.1% sure that no files owned by that user will be left around, which in this case we aren't actually we are pretty sure that files will be left around, so the userdel must be removed from the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141458.k7EEwpvj026776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202437 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 14:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141458.k7EEwrQR026788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202439 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 15:05:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141505.k7EF5q53027476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-14 10:56 EST ------- I've partially fix all found issues. * Sun Aug 13 2006 Andy Shevchenko 2.0.8-3 - set defattr in files sections - fix Requires tag in subpackages - drop setuid attribute from certain binaries (README.fedora has been added) - update fmio-gq-wrapper to 0.4.1 - satisfy rpmlint claim (use -fPIC for library) Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/fmio-2.0.8-3.src.rpm About python files. I try to build on FC4 distribution and have no problem with a single python file. I'll try to rebuild it on fc6 and fix if it's needed. Additional words for usage. I've sf-64pcr3 fm card. I try to use the 'sfr64' as native fmio's driver as well as 'v4l' as kernel driver. Both are work correctly. 'bktr' is only for *BSD systems. I've written README.fedora with several words. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 15:07:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202384] Review Request: dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141507.k7EF7JP9027760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-08-14 10:57 EST ------- PUBLISH +1 Good: * tarball verified against svn * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Desktop entry is fine * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Scriptlets look good. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5 * rpmlint is basically clean. The warning about the devel package not having docs can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 15:11:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141511.k7EFB3Sj028151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-14 11:01 EST ------- The stalled review policy indicates that we give John one more week to respond and then he can be unassigned from the package. However, just a quick once over from me: Source0: does not contain a URL to the upstream tarball. I'd consider this a blocker unless somehow there is no upstream other than this package. rpmlint on SRPM says: W: cobbler strange-permission cobbler.spec 01664 Really odd for the sticky bit to be set on a spec file. W: cobbler setup-not-quiet Not a big deal; pass -q to the %setup macro if you want to quiet this. rpmlint on the built RPM says: E: cobbler non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cobbler/gui.py 0644 rpmlint fires this off anytime it sees a shebang line in a file that's not executable. For Python source this is often bogus; it depends on whether the code is actually runnable (i.e. contains something other than class definitions). This seems to be the case here, so the rpmlint complaint can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 15:22:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] New: Review Request: gnome-sharp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: alexl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.gnome.org/~alexl/gnome-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnome.org/~alexl/gnome-sharp-2.15.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The gtk-sharp2 package was split up upstream into two tarballs, gtk-sharp and gnome-sharp as part of getting accepted into the gnome bindings set. This is the split out package for gnome-sharp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 15:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141532.k7EFWkXF030463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-08-14 11:23 EST ------- If you need to build this you first need: http://www.gnome.org/~alexl/gtk-sharp2-2.9.0-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 15:50:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202384] Review Request: dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141550.k7EFoo5u031871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-14 11:41 EST ------- Dates has been built for extras-development. Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 15:52:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141552.k7EFqPMJ032090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 11:42 EST ------- # Mono only availible on these: ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc # no mono on s390 for now: s390 s390x Is this really required now? I can only remember seeing it on FC packages - it has certainly never been pulled up on anything in FE How does this build in a non x86 based system. Unless something has changed, this will try to install material to lib64 rather than %{_prefix}/lib so the build won't work. The way I have fixed this is to have %define monodir %{_prefix}/lib %configure --libdir=%{monodir} %files %{monodir}/blah... I will try this out tonight on the x86_64 box and let you know what happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 16:01:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] New: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crack-attack.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crack-attack-1.1.14-7.src.rpm Description: A puzzle/action game in which you rush to eliminate colored blocks before they fill your screen. Particularly clever eliminations cause garbage to clutter your opponent's screen. Who will survive the longest!? Playable both online and off. --- Notice that there has been some legal discussion about this package on f-e-l because it uses game mechanics from a well known game, which in itself is not a problem. The problem is however that the docs mention this well known and trademarked game as the inspiration for the game mechanics. Since this name is trademarked I have added a patch to the srpm removing the trademarked name from the binary packages. I haven't made a special source tarbal without this name because Core cotnains a package (gnome-games) with similar issues and also handles this in the spec file and not with a modified tarbal, and what is good enough for Core should be good enough for FE (when talking about legal issues) . I've compared this game with screenshots from the game this is inspired by and except for the game mechanics nothing has been copied, the graphics logo, controls etc all are different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 16:02:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141602.k7EG2AA2000379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-08-14 11:52 EST ------- The exclusivearch is needed of course. Otherwise things break on the other arches. FE doesn't build on any non-mono arch, so that doesn't matter. I haven't tried on x86-64. Maybe it needs: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT GACUTIL_FLAGS="/package gtk-sharp /gacdir %{_prefix}/lib /root ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_prefix}/lib" that gtk-sharp2 has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 16:17:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141617.k7EGHejV001439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-14 12:08 EST ------- Updated Spec and SRPM. Found a problem with last release. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/tirpc/lib/0.1.7-3/libtirpc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/tirpc/lib/0.1.7-3/libtirpc-0.1.7-3.fc6.src.rpm WRT Bill's Comment #7, I totally agree... sooner whould have been better... So now if you would like be to wait until early FC7 for this code, just let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 16:19:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141619.k7EGJISx001538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-08-14 12:09 EST ------- tested on x86_64 (FC5) builds and works fine here. (nvidia drivers + 7800GTX) one thing I found: rpmlint /home/dragoran/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/crack-attack-1.1.14-7.x86_64.rpm W: crack-attack unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/crack-attack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 16:28:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141628.k7EGSFQj001892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-14 12:18 EST ------- There is no policy which says that all rpmlint errors/warnings must be fixed. Look at it from a different perspective to understand. There is nothing about this in the Package Review Guidelines. Nothing at all about creating user/group accounts. Not even the guideline about "setuid root" from fedora.us QACheckList is included. When we agreed on the initial rather long list of MUST/SHOULD items in a FESCO meeting, we didn't cover useradd/groupadd/userdel/groupdel or fedora-useradd and friends. | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines | | - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. | This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine | sanity. If anything had changed over time, it should have been announced clearly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 16:56:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141656.k7EGuBnA003409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-08-14 12:46 EST ------- should there be any sound? here I can here nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 17:27:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141727.k7EHROYB005497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-14 13:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.38.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Aug 14 2006 Alain Portal 2.38.0-1 - Update to 2.38.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 17:45:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202220] Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{, x} In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141745.k7EHjYAJ007070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-295 - RHEL5 2.95.3 compatibility libstdc++ for s390{,x} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202220 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188271 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 18:10:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141810.k7EIAOjx008448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-14 14:00 EST ------- rpmlint still says E: python-simplejson zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/simplejson-1.3-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe I agree it can be ignored. Good: + sitelib macro + source matches + license (MIT) + mock builds on devel x86_64 + proper %clean section + macro usage throughout + noarch APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 18:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141828.k7EISSDJ010736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2006-08-14 14:18 EST ------- The source RPM and spec file are available at http://people.redhat.com/sconklin, and the release is tagged r0-1-10 in the source tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 18:35:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141835.k7EIZNGq011585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-08-14 14:25 EST ------- I think this game was removed from Fedora in the past for some legal reason. I don't have any details of this though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 18:43:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141843.k7EIhNGN012750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-14 14:33 EST ------- This package does not follow the guidelines from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono .pc file is not in -devel package gacutil is not used to register dlls no call to ldconfig for .so file placed in %{_libdir}/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 18:47:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141847.k7EIlK2F013442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-08-14 14:37 EST ------- There is no reason this game can't be in extras. See bug #202437 for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 18:52:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141852.k7EIqiV7014539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 wolters.liste at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wolters.liste at gmx.net 2006-08-14 14:43 EST ------- Had to add a build require, gmp-devel, but now it builds in devel, I will ask for a FC5 branch also. Closed as NEXTRELEASE according to http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 19:13:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141913.k7EJDxwW016730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 19:28:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141928.k7EJSmef017927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 19:29:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141929.k7EJTapi018035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual Alias: php-manual-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-08-14 15:20 EST ------- Actually, this is good enough. I just needed to know where it was located in order to complete the review. You may want to add a comment in the spec file indicating where the license is located, but not necessary. Approved as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 19:31:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141931.k7EJVTZV018248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-14 15:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > There is no reason this game can't be in extras. See bug #202437 for more > information. Exactly, this game wasn't in FE because perl-SDL wasn't in FE. perl-SDL wasn't in FE because it can use smpeg, however it turns out that perl-SDL is just fine without smpeg as (sofar) no perl-SDL using packages use the smpeg part. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 19:38:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141938.k7EJca5Q018680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-14 15:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > tested on x86_64 (FC5) > builds and works fine here. > (nvidia drivers + 7800GTX) > one thing I found: > rpmlint /home/dragoran/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/crack-attack-1.1.14-7.x86_64.rpm > W: crack-attack unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/crack-attack > I ran rpmlint too and it didn't give that warning for me, there seems to be a bug in rpmbuild which sometimes causes this (yes sometimes, strange but true) often a rebuild of the very same srpm / spec will fix it :| (In reply to comment #2) > should there be any sound? > here I can here nothing. Sound would be nice, but isn't included upstream, so you not hearing anything is to be expected :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 19:53:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608141953.k7EJrwXM019891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(steved at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-14 15:43 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - Use %{name}-%{version} in URL field as to not have to update it every time the version changes. - Remove Requires(postun) and (pre) on ldconfig, as %post -p picks that up automagically - Replace %makeinstall with make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}. %makeinstall has been known to break packages in bad ways and its use is highly discouraged. - Don't package static libraries unless there is a VERY good reason to do so. - Don't list gssapi requirement specifically, rpm will figure that out on its own when building the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 20:15:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142015.k7EKFvXZ021719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-08-14 16:06 EST ------- Imported to CVS, added to owners.list, FC-5 branch requested, tagged and built for devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 20:17:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Quod Libet is a music management program. It provides several different ways to view your audio library, as well as support for Internet radio and audio feeds. It has extremely flexible metadata tag editing and searching capabilities. Ex Falso is a tag editor with the same tag editing interface as Quod Libet, but it does not play files. Supported file formats include Ogg Vorbis, MP3, FLAC, MOD/XM/IT, Musepack, Wavpack, and MPEG-4 AAC. (FYI, Quod Libet uses GStreamer for audio playback so it will actually only support the audio formats that GStreamer supports). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 20:19:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142019.k7EKJ1qg022166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|A music management program ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-14 16:09 EST ------- DOH! Forgot to set a proper summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 20:20:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142020.k7EKKh9J022312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 16:10 EST ------- If this is for core, does it still need to follow the FE guides? (sorry if this is a blindingly obviously question) As to installing gtk-sharp2 : with *that* spec file? You gotta be joking! Where's the -devel file? what is GACUTIL - it doesn't exist (gacutil does)! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 20:29:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142029.k7EKTmT4022965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-14 16:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > If this is for core, does it still need to follow the FE guides? (sorry if this > is a blindingly obviously question) Yes. The packaging guidelines are for Fedora, ALL of Fedora. Not just Extras or Core. There is ONE set of guidelines that applies to ALL of Fedora, including Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 20:30:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142030.k7EKUBbv023001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 16:20 EST ------- Requires(post): xorg-x11-font-utils, %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath, fontconfig Requires(postun): fontconfig rpmlint will complain that you're using a mixture of spaces and tabs. Use one or the other. %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/japanese/misc This is a problem. This directory is already owned by fonts-japanese-0.20050222-11.1.1.noarch This means that you can't have %files %{fontdir}/ You will need to explicitly define what your package owns. It seems to build fine, rpmlint complained about the mixed tabs and spaces Builds cleanly in mock. I'm not going to install it until the ownership problem is resolved as I already have the japanese fonts rpm installed. Please fix and resubmit the spec file only. I'll check that, rebuild and then test the other package from you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 20:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142053.k7EKrZlT024488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-08-14 16:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.39.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Aug 14 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-1 - Update to 2.39.0 French man pages are now uptodate against man-pages. Is there a language so advanced in translation? Please, consider the work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 21:12:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142112.k7ELCf5U025633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-14 17:03 EST ------- rpmlint just says W: gnome-build-devel no-documentation Dependencies OK. APPROVED as per comment 23. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 21:24:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142124.k7ELOKYw026344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 17:14 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 21:24:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142124.k7ELOhhC026384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 Bug 189685 depends on bug 182320, which changed state. Bug 182320 Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 21:32:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142132.k7ELWCJP026872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-14 17:22 EST ------- Build failed: checking for bison... no checking for byacc... no configure: error: Bison is required to build Cherokee error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21464 (%build) You will need to add a BuildRequires for this, bison-devel I think. Also, please add a %changelog section to document changes between releases. Delete the gzip line in %prep, the %setup macro handles that. Delete the Autoreqprov: on line, automatic dependencies are already on. If you must manually export CFLAGS use CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 21:36:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142136.k7ELaKag027135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 17:26 EST ------- Release: %{rel}.%{cvsver} - you need the %{?dist} tag adding %build %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} INSTALL_DIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" does the install dir need to be here (and the CFLAGS)? install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT{%{_bindir},%{_datadir}/%{name}} the make install should create these directories for you. If they don't, mkdir -p is the way to go. %{__make} BINDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir} install Isn't make DEST_DIR=%{buildroot} install more usual? %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.crm This just needs to be %{_datadir}/%{name}/ The binary files should already be 755, so the %defattr before them shouldn't be required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 21:53:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142153.k7ELrarv027901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-14 17:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Build failed: > > checking for bison... no > checking for byacc... no > configure: error: Bison is required to build Cherokee > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21464 (%build) > > > You will need to add a BuildRequires for this, bison-devel I think. > > Also, please add a %changelog section to document changes between releases. > > Delete the gzip line in %prep, the %setup macro handles that. > > Delete the Autoreqprov: on line, automatic dependencies are already on. > > If you must manually export CFLAGS use CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" Done. Bison-devel is not necesary at all, just bison. Thanks John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 21:54:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] New: Review Request: RutilT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 Summary: Review Request: RutilT Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/RutilT.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/5/SRPMS/RutilT-0.11-1.kwizart.FC5.src.rpm Description: Configuration tool for Ralink Wireless devices -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:06:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142206.k7EM6dFY028358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-14 17:57 EST ------- Configuration tool for Rt2400 rt2500 rt2570 rt2600 wifi chipset Related to rt2500-kmod and rt2500 packages... (driver for rt2500 Ralink chipset) web : http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com forum : http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=12685#12685 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142215.k7EMFeYB028850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 18:06 EST ------- ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64 You need a note explaining why it won't work elsewhere BuildRequires: gtk2-devel You also need desktop-file-utils sh configure.sh \ --prefix=%{_prefix} Not required %configure --prefix=%{_prefix} (though the --prefix shouldn't be needed either) %install needs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the start is there no make install on the package? %{_datadir}/rutilt/RutilT128x128.png %{_datadir}/rutilt/RutilT16x16.png ...etc Not needed %{_datadir}/rutilt/ does the same job and you don't need all the pngs listed. It also gives the package ownership of that directory %{_datadir}/applications/livna-RutilT.desktop Um? livna? cat > %{name}.desktop < Message-ID: <200608142216.k7EMGLJC028890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:16:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142216.k7EMGYr4028923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189685 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142217.k7EMHF1W028940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 18:07 EST ------- Just a thought, shouldn't those png files conform to them being placed in the normal icons directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:30:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] New: Review Request: rt2500-kmod Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/kmod-rt2500.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/5/SRPMS/rt2500-kmod-0.0.0.2006080806-3.2.6.17_1.2174_FC5.src.rpm Description: Kernel module and Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices kmodtool v10 linked with RutilT Raconfig2500 cannot ask for root access, but can be dropped to use RutilT... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:33:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202423] Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142233.k7EMX9Ul029452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:36:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142236.k7EMag4N029617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:37:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202529] New: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529 Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/rt2500.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/5/SRPMS/rt2500-0.0.0.2006080806-3_FC5.src.rpm Description: User module and Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:47:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142247.k7EMlrE8030084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-14 18:38 EST ------- Have you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules? Can you provide the requested information, in particular: * A publishable explanation from the author(s) why the module is not merged with the mainline kernel yet and when it's planed to get merged. You of course can ask the author to explain it directly in the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 22:48:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142248.k7EMmvCD030177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 18:39 EST ------- BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3.2.1 If you're only packing this for FC5/6/rawhide, you won't need this. You will need to include desktop-file-utils ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64 Needs a note explaining why also needs a note why smp_mflags are not used on the make line %install cd Utilitys No. If the file is in Utilitys from the BUILD directory, it should be install Utilitys/foo $RPM_BUILD_DIR%{_bindir}/foo You don't need to use cd mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/rt2500 install -D -p -m 0644 THANKS CHANGELOG FAQ LICENSE $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/rt2500 These should be done in the %files section using %doc ie. %doc THANKS CHANGELOG FAQ etc. If the mode is not already correct, %prep is the correct place to fix it. cat > %{name}.desktop </dev/null || : update-desktop-database &>/dev/null || : Have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d for advice on this. You can't just assume gtk-update-icon-cache or update-desktop-database exist, they have to be checked and the package they come from included in the BRs %{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500/RaConfig2500.xpm %{_datadir}/pixmaps/rt2500/adapter.xpm No. %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/ is all that is required %doc %{_datadir}/doc/rt2500/* See above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 23:01:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142301.k7EN15rq030539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 23:06:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142306.k7EN6FQC030831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-08-14 18:56 EST ------- SPEC URL:http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec SRPM URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-8.src.rpm > You don't seem to have added anywhere the runlevels this should run at This one I was not sure about. Initially it was set to run at level 3. But it fails if your machine does not have an IBM RSA card installed. Since many machines don't have this, the runlevels in RHEL4/RHEL5 were removed so that the system admin would have to do this himself/herself. I can make it to be in runlevel 3 again, since this package would be initially in Fedora Extras and then hopefully moved to Core (at which point it definitly should not set the runlevel and let the system admin do it - or perhaps do a lspci and check to see if the PCI device is installed?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 23:17:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193108] Review Request: libsexymm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142317.k7ENHH62031451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsexymm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193108 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-14 19:07 EST ------- Hello, thanks for reviewing my package. * Here's the updated spec : http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/libsexymm.spec * The srpm : http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/libsexymm-0.1.7-3.src.rpm * rpmlint output: [kurosaki at localhost i386]$ rpmlint -i libsexymm-0.1.7-3.i386.rpm [kurosaki at localhost i386]$ rpmlint -i libsexymm-devel-0.1.7-3.i386.rpm W: libsexymm-devel no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. * Issues: 1) About the license, I added a patch to correct the license file. Debian developers were told by libsexymm maintainers (David Trowbridge & Christian Hammond) that the license of the bindings is LGPL. http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/libs/libsexymm/libsexymm_0.1.7-3/libsexymm-dev.copyright It has been fixed 2 weeks ago in libsexymm's svn but no release has been made since, if needed, I'll mail libsexymm maintainers. http://osiris.chipx86.com/svn/osiris-misc/trunk/libsexymm/ChangeLog 2) Right, it needs libxml2 to build. 3) Removed. 4) Corrected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 23:32:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202423] Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142332.k7ENW71n031883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-14 19:22 EST ------- This is a fairly easy package: GOOD ==== * rpmlint output clean * Package/spec name matches upstream * GPL license ok, license file included * Source matches upstream: 9ea9ca93d87bb0f9ad8abca1b34af594 trackballs-1.1.2.tar.gz * Builds in mock on FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64, FC6-i386, FC6-x86_64 * No need for a -devel subpackage * No need for a -doc subpackage * locale files installed correctly * .desktop file installed correctly * icon files installed and updated in %post/%postun correctly * No duplicate %files * Owns all directories that it creates; does not own directories that it should not. * Runs on FC5-x86_64. MUSTFIX ======= * BR: libGL-devel is redundant. This is already required by libGLU-devel. * BR: gcc-c++ is already part of the minimal buildroot, so it can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 23:50:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608142350.k7ENonlh032366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-14 19:41 EST ------- rt2x00 is in development and will be merged with the mainline kernel as soon as it will be ready, this is planned! (and then provide kernel module for all ralink wifi chipset) But there is a bug and rt2x00 cannot be built on fedora ( i'm searching for already submitted bug... ) asking publishable information from the author... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 00:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150003.k7F0393O032668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-14 19:53 EST ------- The only reference I've been able to find for a license for the music files is a general "GPL" tag on the sourceforge project page, which probably explains the License: GPL in the spec file. Have you found any other license info that's specific to the game's music files, as GPL seems a bit odd for music files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 00:39:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150039.k7F0dVLZ001091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-14 20:30 EST ------- updated version of the spec file: - drop qt-devel >= 3.2.1 * how to include desktop-file-utils? - drop exclusive arch, may build on i586, i686, x86_64 - maybe on pcc?(asking team) * what is a version tag example with applet desktop ? - dropped gtk-icon-cache (not high res directory - remplaced with ln rt2500/foo.xpm - doc ok! What else may -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 01:14:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150114.k7F1Ecn9002189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-14 21:04 EST ------- Version 2.1-192 SPECS file fine tuning, user/group clement used to run the main daemon Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-192.spec SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-192.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 01:22:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202318] Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150122.k7F1M0NN002478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202318 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 01:53:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150153.k7F1rnBe003504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-14 21:44 EST ------- For some reason several things have stopped building for me in rawhide, including this package. It still builds fine in FC5, though. OK, so you removed the BR: openssh-client, but you seem to have neglected the other comments I made. The mixed-spaces-and-tabs thing isn't really a blocker but it's still there and it would be good if you fixed it. More troubling is that there's still no dependency on openssh-clients. At minimum you need to require /usr/bin/ssh because gstm will call that directly. (Actually it calls "ssh" and relies on PATH to find it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:05:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193108] Review Request: libsexymm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150205.k7F25oEo003892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsexymm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193108 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-14 21:56 EST ------- The rpmlint warning on no docs in the devel subpackage can be ignored in this case I think. Including a copy of the license is a SHOULD item in the review guidelines, not a MUST, so it's not a blocker either way. Your patch should be fine for now, glad they fixed it upstream. Everything else looks good to me, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:22:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150222.k7F2MlgK004804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-08-14 22:13 EST ------- Hi Laurent, I'm interested in reviewing CGAL but am getting a 404 Not Found error when trying to download the SRPM. Is this submission still active? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:24:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150224.k7F2O3WF004954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-14 22:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) >From your option, I came to think that this package (efont-unicode-bdf) should own its ORIGINAL font directory. This package doesn't require fonts-japanese, of course. However, putting the fonts in /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc will cause problem, especially when fonts-japanese is removed when this package is installed because fonts-japanese calls "chkfontpath -q -r /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc", which removes the entry of efont-unicode-bdf, too. We must treat which package of this package and fonts-japanese will be removed first, which is somewhat troublesome. So, I moved the font directory from /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc to /usr/share/fonts/japanese/%{name} and added some necessary ghost files. The updated spec file is http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec (0.4.2-4) Note: the previous spec file is preserved as http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-3.spec Note: this change affects bug 201170 (jfbterm), so please check if this change is proper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:25:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202318] Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150225.k7F2PeTm005099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202318 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-14 22:16 EST ------- Everything looks good. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + source files match upstream: 19aefcff9043f8645d42f0bbe8c39d18 Scalar-Properties-0.12.tar.gz 19aefcff9043f8645d42f0bbe8c39d18 Scalar-Properties-0.12.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (5/x86_64). + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: == provides perl(Scalar::Properties) = 0.12 perl-Scalar-Properties = 0.12-1.fc5 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass: + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:26:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202319] Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150226.k7F2QC6G005182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202319 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:28:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202319] Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150228.k7F2SmpL005411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202319 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:35:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150235.k7F2ZhjP005909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:39:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202319] Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150239.k7F2dvbn006336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202319 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-14 22:30 EST ------- + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + source files match upstream: 874a13f201c6948e84867f82d950907a Data-Compare-0.13.tar.gz 874a13f201c6948e84867f82d950907a Data-Compare-0.13.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock ( ). + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: == provides perl(Data::Compare) = 0.13 perl(Data::Compare::Plugins::Scalar::Properties) = 1.0 perl-Data-Compare = 0.13-1.fc5 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Compare) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Find::Rule) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=76, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.55 cusr + 0.20 csys = 0.75 CPU) %check is present and all tests pass: + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 02:45:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150245.k7F2jXjV006864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-14 22:36 EST ------- Would this package be helped any by the recent addition of the compat-gcc-34 package to core? (it's 3.4.6, not 3.4.5 however). Ie, could this be reconfigured to just build the frontends and require compat- gcc-34? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 03:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150310.k7F3AUR7008803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-14 23:00 EST ------- Per talking with tibbs on IRC I am going to take over the review, as I had just started in on one just before he did. OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ab7fb92a1ed0db54a88839e64b9ce2c6 SDL_perl-1.20.3.tar.gz ab7fb92a1ed0db54a88839e64b9ce2c6 SDL_perl-1.20.3.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage. n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage. n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} n/a - .la files are removed. n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues/Questions: 1. There is a SDL_perl 2.1.3 on CPAN: http://search.cpan.org/~dgoehrig/SDL_Perl-2.1.3/ Is that version usable for the packages that use this version? Or totally diffrent interface? If that package is imported someday would it conflict with this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 03:42:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150342.k7F3g3ZK010847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-14 23:32 EST ------- It's possible. Frankly I was hoping that their GCC4 work would happen sooner rather than later, but they're still working out 4.0 compatibility while the world is moving on to 4.1 and beyond. The spec actually has the ability to build minimally if the installed GCC version matches the base GCC that GPC is being patched into. (Actually that's pretty much required to avoid file conflicts.) The only real issue with that is all of the patching that Red Hat generally does to GCC. In the past I haven't had problems with this, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 04:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150416.k7F4GqOK011944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-15 00:07 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/abook.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/abook-0.5.6-2.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 04:25:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150425.k7F4P0lN012221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-15 00:15 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gnomeradio.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gnomeradio-1.6-2.src.rpm This one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 04:29:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150429.k7F4TXRS012475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-15 00:20 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/regionset.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/regionset-0.1-4.src.rpm Fixed, although there really is no point in using smp flags, because there's only one gcc command ever executed. Well, it doesn't hurt, either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 05:42:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150542.k7F5gsCY014733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-15 01:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > rpmlint will complain that you're using a mixture of spaces and tabs. Ah.. rpmlint didn't complain, however, spaces and tabs mixed. Fixed by http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec (0.4.2-5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 05:56:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150556.k7F5u1ha015003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-15 01:46 EST ------- bug 202032 (efont-unicode-bdf): Change in efont-unicode-bdf (font path change) affects jfbterm packaging. Please check bug 202032 before this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 06:17:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150617.k7F6HRhj015653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 02:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues/Questions: > > 1. There is a SDL_perl 2.1.3 on CPAN: > http://search.cpan.org/~dgoehrig/SDL_Perl-2.1.3/ > Is that version usable for the packages that use this version? > Or totally diffrent interface? I haven't tried myself but have been told by the previous maintainers from the repo that must not be named that that version is not usable, so I assumed it has a different interface. Also the frozen-bubble package which this bug block contains: "Requires: perl-SDL >= 0:1.19.0, perl-SDL < 0:2.0" and an identical BR. However I've just checked a few other distros / rpm-repo's and I've found that rpmforge have frozen-bubble working with perl-SDL 2.1.2 (with a small patch, so I guess the interface really is different). > If that package is imported someday > would it conflict with this one? > I honestly don't know, but since it seems that frozen-bubble can be made to work with 2.1.x quite easily I'll guess it would be better to make the jumpt to 2.1.x now. I'll post a new version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 06:36:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150636.k7F6aX7M016441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-15 02:27 EST ------- I would run lspci first to check for the device and then if it's there set the run level. I'm not exactly happy at making it run level 3 for extras and then changing it for Core (or RHEL) - it should be correct in all versions before being accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 07:13:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150713.k7F7D1PW017538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-15 03:03 EST ------- It works fine on FC5 ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 07:14:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150714.k7F7EoqK017572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: | |Flexible WebServer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 07:21:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201417] Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150721.k7F7LqBE017801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alleyoop : Graphical front-end to the Valgrind memory checker for x86 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201417 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-15 03:12 EST ------- New spec and srpms at: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/alleyoop.spec http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/alleyoop-0.9.3-1.src.rpm fixes the problem at program exit and mock (FC5) build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 07:43:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150743.k7F7hu9N019050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-15 03:34 EST ------- There is still a dependency on perl(GBF::Make) in the built package, which makes it uninstallable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 08:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150826.k7F8QbkB022162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-15 04:17 EST ------- Sorry. The url is there: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-13.fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec I am thinking about simplifying the spec file. Tell me what you think about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 08:55:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201941] Review Request: tetex-elsevier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150855.k7F8tHTi024308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-elsevier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201941 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-15 04:45 EST ------- Imported in cvs, built for devel, added in owners, branch asked for FC-5. Thanks for the helpfull review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 08:55:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150855.k7F8tmkm024378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-15 04:46 EST ------- Dammit! The package itself creates perl(GBF::Make). It looks like I'll need to explicitly include that it provides perl(GBF::Make). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:00:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150900.k7F9076x024682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-15 04:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) I have uploaded a new version of the package with the suggested changes. The SRPM is available at http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:22:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150922.k7F9M9iI026011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-15 05:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134200) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134200&action=view) Log of connection with SELinux openvpn policy module It seems that it does not work. I'm using the targeted policy in permissive mode (it just does not work with enforcing, so many simple little details fail, coding is a hassle with selinux enabled etc.). See the dmesg log for the problems. It seems that the management connection (local TCP socket) is not allowed and access to the user's certificate files is denied (it's in the user home directory somewhere probably), also there seems to be a problem with the dbus communication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:23:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150923.k7F9NxkT026252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-15 05:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > The package itself creates perl(GBF::Make). It looks like I'll need to > explicitly include that it provides perl(GBF::Make). I think you should filter out the perl(GBF::Make) dependency, as you've done with the others. This is because the perl modules provided by and used by this package are not in the standard perl module install directories, which means that no other packages will be able to use these perl modules unless they know exactly where to look for them. I'd check to ensure that no perl Provides: have slipped through as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:31:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150931.k7F9VVTt026986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-08-15 05:21 EST ------- I updated the spec and the srpms with new versions. ldconfig is added. We do use gacutils to install the dlls, but not in the strange way that the packaging guidelines example show, its just called as a normal part of the upstream makefiles. We do pass the GACUTIL_FLAGS to make to override some of the flags passed to it though. I also added the -devel packages, but I don't think this is a very good idea. The packaging guidelines says its bad because it'll somehow pull in devel packages in a non-devel install, but that is simply not true (it has no dependencies). Instead we duplicate all the package metadata for a 900 byte package, bloating the install. Furthemore, having a -devel package means the distro compose will pull in the 32bit version of the packages into the 64bit distro, reinstating the yum update multilib conflict we solved this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:35:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150935.k7F9Z71Y027408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 05:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Version 2.1-192 SPECS file fine tuning, user/group clement used to run the main > daemon > > > Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-192.spec > SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-192.src.rpm Looks good, I've sponsored you and its ok to import this now. There is one small thing you should fix before importing, please add " || :" at the end of all the commands (not the if / endif lines) in the pre / post / postun scripts, that way if one of these commands fail it doesn't cause the entire rpm transaction to fail. This is especially important for the pre script, because of a user installs, then removes and then tries to reinstall clement the groupadd and useradd will fail because they already exist (which is ok, the exisiting user may be recycled in this corner case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150935.k7F9ZWmK027479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 05:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > (In reply to comment #43) > > I have uploaded a new version of the package with the suggested changes. The > SRPM is available at > http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.2-4.src.rpm > Looks good, approved! I've sponsored you now as promised so you should be able to import this. (In reply to comment #45) > Created an attachment (id=134200) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134200&action=view) [edit] > Log of connection with SELinux openvpn policy module > > It seems that it does not work. I'm using the targeted policy in permissive > mode (it just does not work with enforcing, so many simple little details fail, > coding is a hassle with selinux enabled etc.). > > See the dmesg log for the problems. It seems that the management connection > (local TCP socket) is not allowed and access to the user's certificate files is > denied (it's in the user home directory somewhere probably), also there seems > to be a problem with the dbus communication. Thats unfortunate, still this review has been going on long enough as is, please add a big FAT warning to %description, and maybe somewhere in the docs that selinux needs to be in permissive mode for this to work :| After adding this to owners.list, please open a seperate bug with NetworkManager-openvpn as component to track the SELinux issues, and post a link to that bug here for reference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:36:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150936.k7F9aNHi027664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-08-15 05:26 EST ------- A question on point 2 - the "desktop-file-install". I have included Source1: %{name}.desktop and %install desktop-file-install --vendor %{desktop_vendor} \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ %{SOURCE1} but when i try to build it i get an error "cannot find clusterssh.spec". It seems as though it is not looking in the right place to find it. How should I specify the Source1:? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 09:56:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608150956.k7F9uZtt029168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-15 05:47 EST ------- I've corrected two oversight on the spec file, for instance, I forgot ":" after BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:02:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151002.k7FA2gtA029507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-15 05:53 EST ------- Do the certificate files *have* to be the user's home directory (this is a biggie for SELinux, which likes to keep "user" and "system" space as far apart as possible), or could they go in the usual /etc/openvpn place? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:36:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151036.k7FAaKoP031372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-15 06:26 EST ------- ** gstm-1.2-2.src.rpm builds and runs fine on my x86_64 machine under FC-5. ** rpmlint produces: W: gstm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs ** However, I think that %{_bindir}/gaskpass should go into a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:40:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151040.k7FAeXPd031599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-15 06:31 EST ------- quote of IvD: * Ivo van Doorn (aka IvD) o Source-rebuild rt2x00 main developer o rt2400/rt2500 Source Code fixes and enhancements "The legacy drivers: rt2400, rt2500, rt2570, rt61 and rt73 will _never_ be merged with the kernel tree since they do not comply with any of the kernel coding rules. The design is ugly, it is not portable and is buggy on SMP and PREEMPT enabled machines, and is even more buggy on big endian machines. rt2x00 already is in the wireless-dev tree and will be merged upstream when rt2x00 and the dscape stack are stable. When they are it would also finally resolve the solution that rt2x00 is not working with Fedora Core kernels because he Fedora Core kernels are so heavily patched that the API of certain structures have changed and external module compilation will always fail. " Answear about how much time it will take will follow... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151041.k7FAfH9E031625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 06:31 EST ------- Ok, I've updated both perl-SDL and frozen-bubble to work with the newer perl-SDL. New perl-SDL here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/perl-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/perl-SDL-2.1.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:42:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151042.k7FAg1Y1031708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 06:32 EST ------- New version to work with the new perl-SDL-2.1.3: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble-1.0.0-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:46:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151046.k7FAkfAU031935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 06:37 EST ------- p.s. I think this should only be build for the devel branch now since it breaks existing apps, which is BAD todo with release versions. Leaving it in that other repo for FC-4 and FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:47:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151047.k7FAlUYB031992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-15 06:38 EST ------- In general this will not be possible. Since connections are user-specific settings certificates are user-specific, too. We authenticate users, not machines. And users do not have write permission in /etc/openvpn anyway. And since NM is the gateway from the user to the system space for networking stuff this makes sense. There may be the need then to communicate certificates through in NM in the worst case. For now I think the policy should allow openvpn to read the certificates from the user's home until we found a better solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:50:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151050.k7FAoG2a032162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-15 06:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. Actually, it does: in %files, "%{_datadir}/pixmaps" should be "%{_datadir}/pixmaps/*". This is a MUST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151050.k7FAoZn1032192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 06:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The only reference I've been able to find for a license for the music files is a > general "GPL" tag on the sourceforge project page, which probably explains the > License: GPL in the spec file. Have you found any other license info that's > specific to the game's music files, as GPL seems a bit odd for music files. You're right, I've just send a mail asking upstream and will let you know the result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 10:52:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151052.k7FAqZOh032331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-15 06:42 EST ------- (Sorry for the spam.) Another comment: the %description should preserve the case chosen upstream: "gSTM" instead of "Gstm". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 11:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151118.k7FBIfQU000988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-15 07:09 EST ------- Question about how much time... quote of IvD: "Well it all depends on when rt2x00 is considered stable, dscape might make it to the main kernel tree within a few months. How soon rt2x00 follows afterwards really depends on how fast successes are being achieved with the last few issues regarding association time and the remaining RX issues. So no schedule can be given for neither the next rt2x00 beta, the final rt2x00 or rt2x00 moving to main kernel tree. rt2x00 will be considered stable when it is stable. " I see a lot of theses Ralink wifi chipset in computers around me, but not so much drivers for Fedora or other distributions... That 's why i've made a pre-compiled module for FC5 (may work with FC4 and legacy!) Obviously it may be better than using Ndiswarper... The driver will be osolete as soon as the rt2x00 can build on a Fedora kernel... ( compilation fails for rt2x00- here is somme info : http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=12631#12631) I don't know if a bug is already submitted for this issue... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 11:40:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151140.k7FBePqA002158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(steved at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-15 07:30 EST ------- > - Use %{name}-%{version} in URL field as to not have to update it every time the > version changes. Done. > - Remove Requires(postun) and (pre) on ldconfig, as %post -p picks that up > automagically Done. > - Replace %makeinstall with make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}. %makeinstall > has been known to break packages in bad ways and its use is highly > discouraged. Done. This good to know... I thought %makeinstall was the approved way... I guess I'll need to make this change other packages as well... > - Don't package static libraries unless there is a VERY good reason to do so. So we no longer support static libraries in devel packages? I don't think that is a very good idea.. Being that this is a relatively small library and the RPC code is pretty legacy code... I really don't think excluding the static library is a good idea... > - Don't list gssapi requirement specifically, rpm will figure that out on its > own when building the package. So your saying to removed the "Requires: libgssapi" from the spec file? How will rpm know that this library needes libgssapi? I must be missing something... Spec file and RPM updated with first three requests... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 12:16:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151216.k7FCGh8r003513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-15 08:07 EST ------- Hello! The script make install exist but cannot work well with %RPM_BUILD_ROOT (ie: the binary searches icons in /var/tmp/RutilTv0.11-buildroot/usr/share/rutilt where it should be /usr/share/rutilt. I was using sh configure.sh --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} - So i've just noted where make install place files and use normal prefix to manual install files... What is the regular way of updatating the .spec file? - Make a patch and import (what's the old/new name?) - Upload to new version of the .spec on my website? Quote of INSTALL file: " - Rutilt helper's install path has changed between v0.07 and v0.08. Before, it was /usr/libexec/, it's now /usr/local/share/rutilt/. Ditto with the main binary, is was previously installed in /usr/bin/, it's now in /usr/local/bin/. Make sure you erase the old binaries. ... - "make install" installed the program in /usr/sbin before v0.06, it's now /usr/bin. Make sure you erase your old binary." -> so maybe i can change from /usr/share to /usr/local/share? what is the name of this directory for using in a spec file? But INSTALL is not really clear so i've used path result of the make install script... changed livna to extra and %{_datadir} png.... ExclusiveArch: may be dropped (ppc version of the kmod-rt2500 may be very buggy ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151300.k7FD0nGq004879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-15 08:51 EST ------- ... be corrected? ppc (big endian) may be very buggy cf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 dropped for testing? i586 is certainly good also... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151303.k7FD38tG004950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151303.k7FD38rE004954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202529 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:04:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151304.k7FD4iHe005056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-08-15 08:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > tested on x86_64 (FC5) > > builds and works fine here. > > (nvidia drivers + 7800GTX) > > one thing I found: > > rpmlint /home/dragoran/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/crack-attack-1.1.14-7.x86_64.rpm > > W: crack-attack unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/crack-attack > > > I ran rpmlint too and it didn't give that warning for me, there seems to be a > bug in rpmbuild which sometimes causes this (yes sometimes, strange but true) > often a rebuild of the very same srpm / spec will fix it :| > ok will try to rebuild it > (In reply to comment #2) > > should there be any sound? > > here I can here nothing. > > Sound would be nice, but isn't included upstream, so you not hearing anything is > to be expected :) > ok now the "bad" news : I tested the same rpm on a second box (FC5/UP/x86_64/6600GT) -> the start game button does not launch the game but the same window again. the package versions are not the same as on this box (which works) because there is no internet connection, but it isn't a fresh FC5 install either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:21:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151321.k7FDLVP5005836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-15 09:11 EST ------- Why haven't you imported this package to Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:24:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151324.k7FDOuuc005964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 09:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Actually, it does: in %files, "%{_datadir}/pixmaps" should > be "%{_datadir}/pixmaps/*". This is a MUST. Indeed. In FC5 is it very common for gnome packages to own this directory; 40 packages provide it. When I looked at the list of packages I seem to have missed the fact that "filesystem" is one of those packages, and so you must not own it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:25:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151325.k7FDPZkc006040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-15 09:15 EST ------- I think Chitlesh has been on vacation: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 13:54:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151354.k7FDsbeL007630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 09:45 EST ------- Why has this ticket been closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:00:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151400.k7FE0iBe008124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151403.k7FE3Uwt008393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-15 09:54 EST ------- reopen (don't know why it has closed) really new to bugzilla so i need also a sponsort! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:05:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151405.k7FE5l78008556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat.com 2006-08-15 09:55 EST ------- > I really don't think excluding the static library is a good idea... There really is no good reason to ship a static archive. You're not doing anybody a favor. People might inadvertendly link against it and then security or bug updates don't apply. Of you want to debug a system and use a specially annotated DSO which would not be picked up. Archives should be distributed only for _very_ good reasons. Small and "pretty legacy" code is none of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:12:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151412.k7FEC75o009007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:14:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151414.k7FEE1fJ009205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-15 10:04 EST ------- You will also need to add the review of RutiL-kmod will block this and that this will block RutiL-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:44:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151444.k7FEirPR011450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 10:35 EST ------- Alex, if the guidelines don't make sense, PLEASE PLEASE help us to make them better. Mono is one of those things that leave most of us scratching our heads and trying to make sense of it. The -devel package is to prevent development files being packaged in the main package. We've gone over this before, users may want to develop 32bit mono software on a x86_64 host. If mono isn't arch specific, then why aren't the packages noarch? I don't believe we "solved" anything last week, the headers from the 32bit package and the 64bit package shouldn't conflict. If they do, the package needs to be fixed, not just avoided to sweep the problem under the rug. if you wish to discuss the guidelines, please send mail to fedora-packaging-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:50:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202317] Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151450.k7FEoOKm011925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-HomeDir - Get the home directory for yourself or other users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202317 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-08-15 10:40 EST ------- Also build for FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 14:52:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151452.k7FEq0IN012036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(steved at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 10:41 EST ------- I agree w/ Ulrich. As to the rpm requirement, When building a package, RPM will ldd the libraries to see what other libraries it is linked against and uses that to populate the Requires list. I tested your package myself by removing the explicit Requires: line, and the rpm that was produced DID have a requirement on the gssapi library. This is the preferred method of determining deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 15:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151502.k7FF2UQB012995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ed at eh3.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-08-15 10:52 EST ------- Hi Laurent, thanks for fixing the URL! I grabbed the SRPM and am looking through it. I agree with you that it would be a very good idea to cleanup the spec file and remove all the bits that are unnecessary for Fedora Extras (eg. all the internal_release, prefix, build_doc, etc. macros). As soon as you have a slimmed-down SRPM available, please post it and I'll start doing a thorough review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 15:04:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151504.k7FF43oR013186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-15 10:54 EST ------- Not sure to understand well! Don't know if its really a kmod because it do not produce .ko file! But it's true he seems to need a kernel path (maybe to include headers of wireless extensions...) So, do you expect that I need to make kdump smp xenO or XenU versions of this? Or only provides binaries to related kernel version like 2174_FC5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 15:15:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151515.k7FFFRpB014052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-15 11:05 EST ------- This application (i.e. the application associated to this bug) is not the kernel module but the configuration tool for said module. You need to file this question against the kmod package you've submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 15:21:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151521.k7FFLp33014426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-15 11:12 EST ------- Zabbix 1.1.1 has been released: http://www.zabbix.com/rn1.1.1.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 15:29:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202324] Review Request: nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc - Nagios SNMP plugins to monitor remote disk and processes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151529.k7FFT63q014829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc - Nagios SNMP plugins to monitor remote disk and processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202324 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-08-15 11:19 EST ------- New location: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc.spec ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc-1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 15:44:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151544.k7FFiwLs015857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-15 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I notice MySQL is enabled, but configure also looked for Postgre. Would this be > something you would want to --enable but not Require? We could do that. However, based on the 1.1.1 release notes, it looks like postgres support is currently broken, fix slated for 1.1.2. Speaking of which, new build is updated to v1.1.1 (thank you, Jeff). > You'll also want zabbix-web to Require php-mysql Okay, I simply changed Requires: php to php-mysql, since php-mysql requires php. > Please substitute the references to /var with %{_localstatedir} in your sed scripts. Done. Latest build: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 15:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151551.k7FFp353016445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-08-15 11:41 EST ------- Paul, Sounds good. I made a fix so that it would check the PCI Vendor ID and if found, add the service to the proper run-level. Here are the updated URLs: SPEC URL:http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec SRPMS URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 16:12:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151612.k7FGCBoa017700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-15 12:02 EST ------- OK! But this config file also work for rt2400 rt2570and rt2600. That 's why i've proposed an independant package for RutilT. It can be linked inside rt2500-kmod to provide rt2500-kmod-util ( I don't know how to do this for now - with use of kmodtool) Or use requires: RutilT-kmod inside rt2500-kmod to link with the same kernel version. Since this config tool is optionnal (not needed by rt2500-kmod which provide ra2500config ) but is smarter than the one provided. I have proposed not do link it with the driver for now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 16:39:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177249] Review Request: jrtplib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151639.k7FGdjXm019408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jrtplib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177249 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-15 12:30 EST ------- + built on devel x86_64 + follows naming conventions + license (MIT) + source matches + BuildRequires sane + consistent use of macros + devel subpackage with the development files, requires base package n-v-r + calls to ldconfig + proper %clean + proper permissions + rm of *.a and *.la rpmlint says: E: jrtplib shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/libjrtp-3.6.0.so A result of not --disable-static or equivalent so I'll ignore. Rationale commented in spec. Bit of a typo in devel subpackage %description, mentions JThread. Cut and paste, I see. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 16:40:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177247] Review Request: jthread In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151640.k7FGeEjn019468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jthread https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177247 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 16:47:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151647.k7FGlEjV019966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 16:56:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187282] Review Request: sax2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151656.k7FGuRW9020506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sax2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187282 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-15 12:46 EST ------- I am dropping reviewing this. The current spec does look a bit tricky to maintain with the SuSE and Fedora parts. And I would use system-config-display anyway. If anyone else wants to pick it up go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 18:02:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151802.k7FI2sdQ025362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 13:53 EST ------- Good news, I got a repsonse from upstream and the music really is GPL: --- Hi Hans, I agree with you that having a GPL licence is a bit odd for binary data but since this was not a question if had thought of very hard when the first release of trackballs was made several years ago this is the licence i choose for the whole project (including music, sfx, levels and music). Also, since the music files have been contributed to the project by others than me under the GPL licence (as I explicitly asked for) it makes it very difficult for me change this. So, in short, yes the music is also licensed under the GPL license. I hope this does not pose any difficult question such as "what/where is the sourcecode for the music..." cheers / Mathias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 18:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202423] Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151804.k7FI4VOL025490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 13:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > MUSTFIX > ======= > * BR: libGL-devel is redundant. This is already required by libGLU-devel. > * BR: gcc-c++ is already part of the minimal buildroot, so it can be removed. New version with this fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/trackballs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/trackballs-1.1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 18:08:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151808.k7FI8b7Q025686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 13:58 EST ------- Finally my mirror is updated and I can build again. This still builds fine and indeed all of the documentation and examples are there. However, there are a couple of issues: Proper flags are not pased to the compiler. I use this hack at the end of %prep to get them passed properly; the resulting package still seems to work correctly: perl -pi -e "s/^(CFLAGS.*=.*)/\1 %{optflags}/" makefile I wonder if the examples would be more proper as documentation. This would be more in line with what I've seen in the past, but I don't think it's a blocker. * source files match upstream: 0aedef51e76cf07533d82fe4dcd89efa brandy_119.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none!) X compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete (even though the compiler flags are wrong, -g is still passed) * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: brandy = 1.0.19-2.fc6 = (no non-glibc or rpm dependencies) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual testing shows that things at least install and run. (My BASIC is not the best after a couple of decades of disuse.) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 18:08:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151808.k7FI8siH025712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-15 13:59 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint output, which can be safely ignored: W: trackballs-music no-documentation * Package/spec named appropriately * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Source matches upstream: 5a8911006ca2be3b3571875ce34a5105 tb_design.ogg 2d254de734c8d1c07ebd0c8d6fb893c0 tb_genesis.ogg ab033eac91054ed9700f6e0a8e2f1280 tb_hrluebke.ogg 5a968fb86cc43fa08bbe323b63d0a457 tb_plinkeplanke.ogg * Contains no code, but acceptable game content * No need for -doc subpackage * No need for -devel subpackage * No need for a .desktop file * Package does not need to own any directories * File permissions ok * Package works as expected when installed with the game SHOULD ====== * You can prevent unneeded copying of the files by removing the 'cp' commands from %prep and using 'install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE0} %{SOURCE1} ...' in %install. There's not too much to review here. The confirmation of the GPL license from the author is good enough for me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 18:10:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202423] Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151810.k7FIApAF025883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-15 14:01 EST ------- All MUSTFIX items fixed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 19:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202423] Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151909.k7FJ9kw6000729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 15:00 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 19:10:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151910.k7FJAB3n000783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 Bug 202424 depends on bug 202423, which changed state. Bug 202423 Summary: Review Request: trackballs - Steer a marble ball through a labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202423 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 19:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151912.k7FJCcRD001000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 15:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > now the "bad" news : > I tested the same rpm on a second box (FC5/UP/x86_64/6600GT) -> the start game > button does not launch the game but the same window again. > the package versions are not the same as on this box (which works) because there > is no internet connection, but it isn't a fresh FC5 install either. > Hmm, is your other machine 64 bit too? Although I doubt that is the problem, my devel machine is 64 bit. Could you try fully updating the affected machine, maybe some of crackattacks dependencies cause this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 19:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151919.k7FJJhY0001552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 19:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202033] Review Request: deltarpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151928.k7FJSLks002184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deltarpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 ------- Additional Comments From misa at redhat.com 2006-08-15 15:18 EST ------- Do you have any good suggestion on a good group for this to live in? I can see it in: Development/Tools Applications/Archiving (well, maybe not, rpms are not generally for archives) Aplications/System -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 19:39:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202424] Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151939.k7FJd06O003289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trackballs-music - In-game music for Trackballs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202424 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-15 15:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > SHOULD > ====== > * You can prevent unneeded copying of the files by removing the 'cp' > commands from %prep and using 'install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE0} %{SOURCE1} ...' > in %install. > Good idea, done. > > APPROVED Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 19:47:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608151947.k7FJlOP3004072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 15:37 EST ------- Seems to be some 64-bit problems: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/*.so.* File not found: /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins File not found: /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins/libastyle.so (and so on for many files). Looks like the upstream source wants to install into /usr/lib regardless of what configure is told. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 20:02:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] New: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/bygfoot/bygfoot.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/bygfoot/bygfoot-2.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Bygfoot is a small and simple graphical football (a.k.a. soccer) manager game featuring many international leagues and cups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 20:11:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152011.k7FKBoia006112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-15 16:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Seems to be some 64-bit problems: > > RPM build errors: > File not found by glob: > /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/*.so.* > File not found: > /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins > File not found: > /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins/libastyle.so > (and so on for many files). > > Looks like the upstream source wants to install into /usr/lib regardless of what > configure is told. > Should be a libtool issue I think as the Makefile.am files are very clean and all are used on the build system to create the "executable" files. Can you check how is defined libdir in Makefile.in and Makefile in some src/plugins/ subdir? I have libdir = @libdir@/@PACKAGE@/plugins in Makefile.in and libdir = ${exec_prefix}/lib/codeblocks/plugins in Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 20:26:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152026.k7FKQWNg007216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manuel at todo-linux.com ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-15 16:16 EST ------- It also works perfectly on: [root at Arbusto ~]# cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) And: [root at Arbusto ~]# lspci | grep -i vga 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 20:33:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152033.k7FKX0Of007783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 20:35:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152035.k7FKZUr9007907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-15 16:26 EST ------- I'll give this a look over :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 20:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152044.k7FKin53009104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-15 16:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > I notice MySQL is enabled, [...]. Would this be > something you would want to --enable but not Require? I would concur with this statement. I would think that on larger installations a person would want to run the Zabbix server and the MySQL server on separate systems, and wouldn't want to have mysql-server installed needlessly. Sure having as a Require will make things easier for newbie administrators, but I don't think that that is as important right now. Plus hopefully the Zabbix devs will have PostgreSQL support fixed soon and I'm sure that PostgreSQL users wouldn't want the MySQL server installed on their systems and vice-versa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 20:50:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152050.k7FKo2Hk009580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-15 16:40 EST ------- I have updated the spec file with libdir defined when running configure. Can you try to rebuild the sources using this spec file? I will upload the SRPM tomorrow. Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152107.k7FL7hqw010605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 16:58 EST ------- No problem; I rebuilt with that spec and everything seems OK. Aside from the rpmlint warnings that you indicated were false positives (which I agree with, BTW), there is: W: codeblocks setup-not-quiet W: codeblocks mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (You have to run rpmlint on the SRPM to see this.) The former is IMHO not a blocker but can be cured by passing -q to %setup. The latter can be fixed by deciding whether you're going to use tabs or spaces for indentation and stick with it. (You mostly use tabs but use spaces in %package devel and the Requires: bit of %package contrib.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152107.k7FL7lEo010618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(steved at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-15 16:57 EST ------- Just curious.... what is an valid reason to include a static library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:11:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152111.k7FLBfjc010794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-15 17:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > I notice MySQL is enabled, [...]. Would this be > > something you would want to --enable but not Require? > > I would concur with this statement. Heh, I think John was only talking about Postgres there, but see my note on this very issue in the initial description. I'm definitely open to not including mysql-server as a Requires (I'll make that change to my local copy now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:37:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152137.k7FLbPZ5012168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-15 17:27 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/crm114.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/crm114-0-1.20060704a.src.rpm New version, fixed parallel make and rpmlint problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:40:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152140.k7FLes1H012407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 17:31 EST ------- I personally can't think of any off the top of my head. Others have come up with reasons, I think maybe some stuff used in a boot environment where you don't want shared libs perhaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:47:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202701] New: Review Request: python-xeninst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202701 Summary: Review Request: python-xeninst Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: katzj at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/xeninst/python-xeninst.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/xeninst/python-xeninst-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: Set of python modules to create and install Xen guests. Note that this is a refactoring of the xenguest-install code currently included in the xen package itself. It's being split out to ease maintenance as well as to make it easier for other things (virt-manager) to use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:52:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152152.k7FLqbee013459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-08-15 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Can you include something to the effect that this is the modified version - > altered in order to not break the patent? Ok, I've added this text to the %description: "Due to patent restrictions, this library has a maximum fisheye field-of-view restriction of 160 degrees to prevent stitching of hemispherical photographs." http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano12.spec http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano12-2.8.4-7.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 21:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152153.k7FLrgV4013569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 17:43 EST ------- Bah, mid-air collision. But I'll submit this anyway. There are precious few reasons: The thing just won't build a .so. It needs to be linked against something used at boot time or in rescue or single user mode. That's about all I can think of. I've seen that argument for things like numerical libraries where folks want to link and then run on a different system without having to install any additional libraries, but I don't recall whether that argument was persuasive. Just realised I'm talking about Extras here and this is a Core review, so perhaps the criteria are different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 22:05:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152205.k7FM50xw014157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-15 17:55 EST ------- > - Don't package static libraries unless there is a VERY good reason to do so. Done. > - Don't list gssapi requirement specifically, rpm will figure that out on its > own when building the package. Done. Spec file and srpm have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 22:34:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152234.k7FMY1mK015725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From seandarcy at hotmail.com 2006-08-15 18:24 EST ------- ImageMagick-6.2.8.0-2.x86_64 still has this bug. While the libpng bug has been fixed in libpng-1.2.10-6, IM needs to be rebuilt against it. I did, and it worked fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 22:34:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152234.k7FMYPpY015777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 18:24 EST ------- rpmlint is now quiet; everything looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 22:46:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152246.k7FMkPQR016348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 23:07:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152307.k7FN7Dra017373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-15 18:57 EST ------- Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-14.fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec I have pruned the spec files from non Fedora stuff. I eventually admit that the spec file is complicated enough, even now: the %install stage is quite complicated, as the upstream installation process is not yet well adapted to Fedora Extras requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 23:33:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152333.k7FNXpre018298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(steved at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 19:24 EST ------- Whoops, just noticed that buildroot isn't quite right. You have: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) but the guidelines prefer: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) By using make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} you no longer have to use --prefix=%{buildroot} as files install in the right place. %{_sysconfdir}/netconfig should probably be marked as a config file, perhaps even config(noreplace). 'netconfig' is a pretty generic term, does anything else use it or are you claiming that namespace? (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 15 23:37:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608152337.k7FNbU5A018499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 19:27 EST ------- Proposed patch to fix things up: Also changes my example removal of static libs to use your preferred %{buildroot} rather than $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, for consistency sake. --- ./libtirpc.spec.jk 2006-08-15 18:03:45.000000000 -0400 +++ ./libtirpc.spec 2006-08-15 18:36:58.000000000 -0400 @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ %build autoreconf -fisv -%configure --enable-gss --prefix=%{buildroot} +%configure --enable-gss make all %install @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} # Don't package .a or .la files -rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.{a,la} +rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.{a,la} %post -p /sbin/ldconfig @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ %defattr(-,root,root) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README %{_libdir}/libtirpc.so.* -%{_sysconfdir}/netconfig +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netconfig %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,755) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 00:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160010.k7G0A7OF019853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(steved at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-15 20:00 EST ------- Made the following changes and updated the spec file and srpm. diff -r1.6 libtirpc.spec 9c9 < BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) --- > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 54c54 < %configure --enable-gss --prefix=%{buildroot} --- > %configure --enable-gss 62c62 < rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.{a,la} --- > rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.{a,la} 75c75 < %{_sysconfdir}/netconfig --- > %config(noreplace)%{_sysconfdir}/netconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 00:14:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160014.k7G0Eg7p020050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(steved at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 20:04 EST ------- Ok, approved. I'm supposing that this will be a dep of other things, so it doesn't need to be explicitly listed in comps, correct? Please close when you've built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 00:16:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202701] Review Request: python-xeninst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160016.k7G0G6fU020165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xeninst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202701 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(katzj at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 20:06 EST ------- Everything looks good. rpmlint complains about the #! in some .py files. Do these .py files have an init or main? Do they do anything if executed on their own? E: python-xeninst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xeninst/util.py 0644 E: python-xeninst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xeninst/FullVirtGuest.py 0644 E: python-xeninst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xeninst/XenGuest.py 0644 E: python-xeninst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xeninst/ParaVirtGuest.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 01:34:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160134.k7G1YjcC023006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 21:25 EST ------- Builds fine; here's the rpmlint complaint list: W: quodlibet mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs I'm seeing this quite a bit lately. Just do "less -U *spec" and you can see the inconsistencies in indentation. W: quodlibet incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.22-1 0.23-1.fc6 Looks like a typo in your changelog entry. E: quodlibet non-executable-script /usr/share/quodlibet/plugins/songsmenu/replaygain.py 0644 E: quodlibet non-executable-script /usr/share/quodlibet/plugins/songsmenu/_subprocobj.py 0644 I think these are valid. These errors are often false positives, when the python code is actually runnable. But these seem to contain only class definitions, and as such they shouldn't have the shebang line. At least that's my interpretation of things. A while back there was a good IRC discussion about this; I'll try to dig up the log if you'd like to read it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 02:05:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160205.k7G25gOh023959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |osgcal ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-08-15 21:56 EST ------- Going down my own review checklist: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/review-checklist.txt 1. One rpmlint error; will cover below. 2. I have some concerns about the version/release of this package. Will discuss below. 3. Spec is named crm114.spec, check. 4. Package meets Packaging Guidelines, AFAICT. 5. Licensed under GPL, check. 6. License: GPL, check. 7. n/a, no LICENSE/COPYING file in tarball. 8. Spec appears to be American English. 9. Spec seems legible. 10. md5sum on crm114-20060704a-BlameRobert.no-TRE.src.tar.gz does NOT match upstream. WTF? 11. Compiles and builds on i386/ppc (my two supported build platforms). 12. x86_64 excluded, as per dependency on tre-devel. You should know the drill. 13. Builds under Plague, so I imagine all of its dependencies are listed. 14. n/a, I think. 15. n/a (no shared libs) 16. n/a 17. crm114-emacs does not own %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp/; I believe emacs-el does. Please add a dependency. 18. No duplicate %files entries. 19. Not 100% certain on the defattr for the main package. 20. Has valid %clean section. 21. Macro use appears consistent. 22. Package contains code, not content. 23. The doc directory makes up more than half the package's size; you may want to consider splitting it off to a -doc subpackage. (As discussed on IRC.) 24. I don't see anything in %doc affecting runtime. 25. No header files or static libraries. 26. No .pc files. 27. No library files, much less ones with suffixes. 28. n/a (no -devel subpackage) 29. No .la files. 30. No GUI applications. 31. Doesn't own any directories owned by other packages (to the best of my knowledge). 32. Packager should poke upstream to include a LICENSE file. 33. I'm not sure there are any description/summary translations available. 34. Package builds as i386 and ppc in Plague (and thus Mock). 35. Package won't build on x86_64 due to dependency's ExcludeArch: x86_64; other architectures, yes. 36. I can't verify full functionality, but the binary doesn't segfault on i386/ppc. 37. No scriptlets. 38. The -emacs subpackage doesn't Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}; submitter may want to consider doing so. So the standing issues, as I see them (some of which we discussed), are: - rpmlint returns: W: crm114-emacs no-documentation Not sure it's worth remedying. I welcome more experienced reviewers to chime in on this. - I'm concerned about the versioning scheme. How will you be able to re-release 20060704a if there's a bug? Incrementing Release to 2.20060704a will preclude resetting the first digit to 1 with the next release. Also, I believe the 'a' violates the Naming Guidelines. Again, I welcome outside feedback on this. - #10 concerns me greatly. Did you repack the tarball or something? - I think you're missing ExcludeArch: x86_64 (I wouldn't notice, as I don't have an x86_64 buildsys, but this has been a subject of discussion). - Maybe add Req: emacs-el for -emacs, due to that package owning the directory the file is in. (I believe you did this already, offline.) - Is %defattr(-,root,root,-) well-defined enough? - You might want to split out the documentation to a subpackage. - Maybe ask upstream to provide a LICENSE file. - Maybe add Req in #38. I'm sure we'll be in touch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 02:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160212.k7G2CFUM024144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|osgcal |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-08-15 22:02 EST ------- Hmm, I guess Firefox's focus was on Component when I hit PageUp. Oops! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 02:20:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202701] Review Request: python-xeninst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160220.k7G2KdDD024660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xeninst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202701 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(katzj at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-08-15 22:10 EST ------- Nope, but you want python -tt at the top to make it easier to a) add some test coverage (not there yet, but I do actually want to write a little bit of that :-) and b) so that you can always be sure that tabs/spaces are being used consistently in files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 02:40:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160240.k7G2et6k026095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-15 22:31 EST ------- Odd. Can you upload your current spec and desktop file? what is %{desktop_vendor} set to? %{SOURCE1} should be right for Source1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 02:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202701] Review Request: python-xeninst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160254.k7G2seHH027045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xeninst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202701 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-15 22:45 EST ------- Ok, I can waive on that. Approved. I'll let you make the ocmps changes (: Added to dist-fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 02:59:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160259.k7G2xmZ9027314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-15 22:50 EST ------- The version from comment #3 fails in mock here with (from build.log): + echo 'Patch #0 (sdlperl_2.1.2-1.diff.gz):' Patch #0 (sdlperl_2.1.2-1.diff.gz): + /bin/gzip -d + patch -p1 -s + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + patch -p1 -b -z .deb patching file src/OpenGL.xs + patch -p1 patching file src/OpenGL.xs Hunk #1 succeeded at 912 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 1006 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 1090 (offset 2 lines). + echo 'Patch #1 (perl-SDL-no-mixertest.patch):' Patch #1 (perl-SDL-no-mixertest.patch): + patch -p1 -b --suffix .no-mixertest -s The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- t/mixerpm.t~ 2003-03-21 19:48:58.000000000 +0200 |+++ t/mixerpm.t 2004-07-11 00:12:59.851670873 +0300 -------------------------- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2893 (%prep) Agreed with comment #4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 03:14:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160314.k7G3Esvl028056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-15 23:05 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.dyn-o-saur.com/pub/papyrus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.dyn-o-saur.com/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.3.0-1.src.rpm I think this one addresses everything from the previous comments, plus a few more: - New release fixes some problems with the missing demo files - Changed ownership of the demo directories - Added papyrus to the libtool LIBADD automake line should resolve the symbol warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 03:29:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160329.k7G3TwMh028769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-15 23:20 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint output clean * Package and spec named appropriately * Source matches upstream: 2be5ead2aee72adc3fb643630a774b59 frozen-bubble-1.0.0.tar.bz2 * GPL license ok, license file included * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where it ought to be * .desktop file and icons installed correctly * No duplicate %files * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds in mock on FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64, FC6-i386, FC6-x86_64 * No need for -doc subpackage * No need for -devel subpackage * No locales * Owns all directories that it creates * Does not own any directories that it should not * Contains code and allowable game content * File permissions look ok * Not relocatable MUSTFIX ======= * BR: perl is not necessary. It is already picked up by perl-SDL. SHOULD ====== * There is some inconsistency in the use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs. ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}. Both work. Pick one and stick with it. * The perl autoprovider in rpm adds some automatic provides since this package installs files into %{perl_vendorarch}. If these files are only going to be used by frozen-bubble, wouldn't it be better to put them somewhere in %{_datadir}/frozen-bubble instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 03:41:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160341.k7G3f3KR029572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-15 23:31 EST ------- Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 03:47:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160347.k7G3lPLw029944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-15 23:37 EST ------- rpmlint: E: python-pastescript zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/PasteScript-0.9-py2.4.egg-info/not-zip-safe Ignore. W: python-pastescript doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pastescript-0.9/docs/example_cgi_app.ini /usr/bin/env W: python-pastescript doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pastescript-0.9/docs/example_wsgiutils_app.ini /usr/bin/env Many python scripts require this, ignore. About the name, upstream does use capitals when refering to Paste Script, however Debian also does python-pastescript, I'm inclined to follow along. * Uses both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Still readable but easily fixed on next commit. Good: + builds on devel x86_64 + uses setuptools + license (MIT) + noarch + sources match upstream + sitelib macro + follows python templates for macros and file listing script + proper %clean + macro usage throughout + file permissions and ownership Nearly ready for approval, but let's get resolution on the naming issue. See also python-pastedeploy, bug #198288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 04:35:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160435.k7G4Zt6K000455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-16 00:26 EST ------- I have fixed some rpmlint problems. The new Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.1-3.src.rpm I still have problems, but I don't know how to solve it. E: gcin script-without-shellbang /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/gcin This executable text file does not contain a shebang, thus it cannot be properly executed. Often this is a sign of spurious executable bits for a non-script file, but can also be a case of a missing shebang. To fix this error, find out which case of the above it is, and either remove the executable bits or add the shebang. W: gcin-devel no-soname /usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 04:53:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160453.k7G4r1fN001122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 00:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The version from comment #3 fails in mock here with (from build.log): > + echo 'Patch #0 (sdlperl_2.1.2-1.diff.gz):' > Patch #0 (sdlperl_2.1.2-1.diff.gz): > + /bin/gzip -d > + patch -p1 -s > + STATUS=0 > + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' > + patch -p1 -b -z .deb > patching file src/OpenGL.xs > + patch -p1 > patching file src/OpenGL.xs > Hunk #1 succeeded at 912 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1006 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 1090 (offset 2 lines). > + echo 'Patch #1 (perl-SDL-no-mixertest.patch):' > Patch #1 (perl-SDL-no-mixertest.patch): > + patch -p1 -b --suffix .no-mixertest -s > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- t/mixerpm.t~ 2003-03-21 19:48:58.000000000 +0200 > |+++ t/mixerpm.t 2004-07-11 00:12:59.851670873 +0300 > -------------------------- > File to patch: > Skip this patch? [y] > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2893 (%prep) > > Agreed with comment #4. Erm, a patch failing to apply is not mock specific, it seems that for some reason you are still using the patch from the 1.20.3 package which was updated for / in the 2.1.3 package. I just tried to install the provided SRPM on a different PC then where it was developed and there it builds fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 04:56:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160456.k7G4urpF001222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 00:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > MUSTFIX > ======= > * BR: perl is not necessary. It is already picked up by perl-SDL. > Ok, will fix as soon as we've got agreement on the things below > SHOULD > ====== > * There is some inconsistency in the use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs. > ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}. Both work. Pick one and stick with it. > Agree, thats because I didn't do the original specfile I'll make it all $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > * The perl autoprovider in rpm adds some automatic provides since this package > installs files into %{perl_vendorarch}. If these files are only going > to be used by frozen-bubble, wouldn't it be better to put them somewhere > in %{_datadir}/frozen-bubble instead? Erm, there are .so files installed to %{perl_vendorarch}, hence the package is not noarch. I could try dropping them in %{_libdir}/frozen-bubble instead, but I've got no clue howto make perl find them there (first perl package ever for me). Or we could just leave them there :) (in which case I could add a provides filter to make it stop providing this if you want). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 05:16:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160516.k7G5GRiS001830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-16 01:06 EST ------- I must be missing something very basic: # rpm -qlp CGAL-3.2.1-14.i386.rpm /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1 /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.FREE_USE /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.LGPL /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.QPL /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/README.Fedora This doesn't look like a reasonable packaging to me. Also: # rpmlint CGAL-*3.2.1-14.i386.rpm E: CGAL devel-dependency CGAL-devel E: CGAL no-binary W: CGAL-devel no-dependency-on CGAL E: CGAL-devel file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/CGAL/make/makefile E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 05:22:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160522.k7G5Manc001939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-16 01:12 EST ------- ugh. I thought I checked all the files, but I missed that patch, you are right. Sorry for the trouble... Since this is pretty much a totally new package, I will go ahead and run thru my review checklist on it again. ;) OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 6ce26e1b710ce52def4ec22637cd5176 SDL_Perl-2.1.3.tar.gz 6ce26e1b710ce52def4ec22637cd5176 SDL_Perl-2.1.3.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage. n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage. n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} n/a - .la files are removed. n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. rpmlint says: W: perl-SDL strange-permission filter-depends.sh 0755 I think that can be ignored. It should be 755 I would think. 2. I see the package is providing: perl(Walker) and perl(main) Is that correct or should those be filtered out as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 05:26:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160526.k7G5QrUB002031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 01:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > ugh. I thought I checked all the files, but I missed that patch, you are right. > Sorry for the trouble... > No problem. > 1. rpmlint says: > > W: perl-SDL strange-permission filter-depends.sh 0755 > > I think that can be ignored. It should be 755 I would think. > Yes very much so. > 2. I see the package is providing: > perl(Walker) > and > perl(main) > Is that correct or should those be filtered out as well? > That indeed looks wrong I'll do a new version filtering out those too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 05:53:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160553.k7G5rM7X002715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 01:43 EST ------- Version without the wrong Provides: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/perl-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/perl-SDL-2.1.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 06:24:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160624.k7G6O3Dr003554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-16 02:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > * The perl autoprovider in rpm adds some automatic provides since this package > > installs files into %{perl_vendorarch}. If these files are only going > > to be used by frozen-bubble, wouldn't it be better to put them somewhere > > in %{_datadir}/frozen-bubble instead? > > Erm, there are .so files installed to %{perl_vendorarch}, hence the package is > not noarch. Yes, my bad. The main point was that if these aren't perl modules that can be used by other applications then they should live in an application-specific directory instead of the system-wide perl tree. > I could try dropping them in %{_libdir}/frozen-bubble instead, but > I've got no clue howto make perl find them there (first perl package ever for me). > > Or we could just leave them there :) (in which case I could add a provides > filter to make it stop providing this if you want). I've seen python programs work with python libraries that don't live in %{python_sitearch} and figured that perl could work the same way. But if that's a problem, then a Provides: filter should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 06:33:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160633.k7G6X7lA003840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-16 02:23 EST ------- Excellent. That looks all good to go to me, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this as NEXTRELEASE when you have it checked in and built for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:02:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160702.k7G72DPo004741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-16 02:52 EST ------- Further issues: - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE IMO, this directory name is too general. - Static libs: /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a /usr/lib/libcore++.a - A more general design problem: Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:09:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160709.k7G795H8004960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-16 02:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134280) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134280&action=view) New SRPM made after John Patrick told me some errors on my spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:09:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160709.k7G79nsk004976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-16 03:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134281) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134281&action=view) New spec file for Cherokee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160711.k7G7BN3a005027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-16 03:01 EST ------- (From update of attachment 134281) # Cherokee # 2006 Alvaro Lopez Ortega Name: cherokee Version: 0.5.4 Release: 1 License: GPL BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build Docdir: %{_datadir}/doc Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Summary: Flexible and Fast web server Group: Productivity/Networking/Web/Servers URL: http://www.0x50.org BuildRequires: bison %description Cherokee is a very fast, flexible and easy to configure Web Server. It supports the widespread technologies nowadays: FastCGI, SCGI, PHP, CGI, TLS and SSL encrypted connections, Virtual hosts, Authentication, on the fly encoding, Apache compatible log files, and much more. %prep %setup -q %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ --enable-pthreads make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" %install make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT #rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/cherokee/sites-enabled/default %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post /sbin/ldconfig ln -s %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-available/default \ %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-enabled/default mkdir -p /home/httpd %postun /sbin/ldconfig %files %{_mandir}/* %{_bindir}/* %{_libdir}/* %{_datadir}/* %{_sbindir}/* %{_includedir}/* %{_sysconfdir}/* /home/httpd/* %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:21:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160721.k7G7LGGn005396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-16 03:11 EST ------- Actions(In reply to comment #7) > I must be missing something very basic: > > # rpm -qlp CGAL-3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1 > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.FREE_USE > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.LGPL > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.QPL > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/README.Fedora > > This doesn't look like a reasonable packaging to me. > > Also: > > # rpmlint CGAL-*3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > E: CGAL devel-dependency CGAL-devel > E: CGAL no-binary > W: CGAL-devel no-dependency-on CGAL CGAL is a meta-package that requires CGAL-libs, CGAL-devel, and CGAL-sources. The reason is that the CGAL users community is used to get CGAL as a whole. > E: CGAL-devel file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/CGAL/make/makefile > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. (In reply to comment #8) > Further issues: > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > IMO, this directory name is too general. CGAL-3.2.1 ships CORE-1.7, http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core_pages/intro.html This directory is from CORE. > - Static libs: > /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a > /usr/lib/libcore++.a upstream libCGALQt is static only, as indicated in comment #1, as well as upstream libcore++. I know that static libraries should be avoided "as far as possible", in Fedora. Is the upstream devs choice a sufficient reason? > - A more general design problem: > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt > > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. Yes, it should only be /usr/include/CGAL/compiler_config.h. Is it a blocker? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:21:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160721.k7G7LIlH005406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-16 03:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ > ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ > --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ > --mandir=%{_mandir} \ > --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ > --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ > --enable-pthreads Any particular reason for not using %configure? Also, here you are not passing --includedir, nevertheless you are using it in %files. > make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" Why this? Above you are exporting CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", here you are overriding it with something compatible again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160722.k7G7MHqW005464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-16 03:12 EST ------- Typo: s/compatible/incompatible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:33:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160733.k7G7XXs4006211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-08-16 03:23 EST ------- I have put 3 files onto http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/ clusterssh.spec clusterssh.desktop clusterssh.rpmbuild - contains all the output from me trying to run $ rpmbuild -ta SOURCES/clusterssh-3.19.1.tar.gz This process was working until I attempted to add the "desktop-file-install". >From what I was able to find out, "%(desktop_vendor}" was a more neutral way of setting the vendor to "fedora", but in the files above it is expliclty set to "fedora" (which makes no difference). Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:34:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160734.k7G7Yi3S006297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-08-16 03:25 EST ------- Oh, and in "playing" I have set replaced SOURCE1 with %{name}.desktop, but that made no difference either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:35:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160735.k7G7ZoOd006386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-16 03:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Actions(In reply to comment #7) > > I must be missing something very basic: > > > > # rpm -qlp CGAL-3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1 > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.FREE_USE > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.LGPL > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.QPL > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/README.Fedora > > > > This doesn't look like a reasonable packaging to me. > > > > Also: > > > > # rpmlint CGAL-*3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > > E: CGAL devel-dependency CGAL-devel > > E: CGAL no-binary > > W: CGAL-devel no-dependency-on CGAL > > CGAL is a meta-package that requires CGAL-libs, CGAL-devel, and CGAL-sources. Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense. Consider this to be a MUST FIX. Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into *-devel. > > E: CGAL-devel file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/CGAL/make/makefile > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX > (In reply to comment #8) > > Further issues: > > > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > > IMO, this directory name is too general. > > CGAL-3.2.1 ships CORE-1.7, http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core_pages/intro.html > This directory is from CORE. And? This doesn't answer my remark. > > - Static libs: > > /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a > > /usr/lib/libcore++.a > > upstream libCGALQt is static only, as indicated in comment #1, as well as > upstream libcore++. I know that static libraries should be avoided "as far as > possible", in Fedora. Is the upstream devs choice a sufficient reason? Formally not, but it's sufficient reason for me not to approve a package and to classify a package's quality as "low" ;) > > - A more general design problem: > > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt > > > > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. > > Yes, it should only be /usr/include/CGAL/compiler_config.h. Is it a blocker? Well, there actually are 2 issues with this. - Package dependencies. You will have to find a way to handle the hard-coded version dependencies in rpm. - Hard-coding compiler characteristics is a common design flaw many packages suffer from. This should not be much of a problem for current Fedora, but can easily become one. In many cases, such stuff disqualfies a package from inclusion in multilib'ed distros. This is an upstream problem, which probably doesn't affect current Fedora. [Wrt. endianness: Many people miss that endianness is a compiler feature. Packages hard-coding endianness break on biendian targets, e.g. for multilib'ed mips and sh distros] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 07:55:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160755.k7G7tTl6007736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-08-16 03:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ > > ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ > > --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ > > --mandir=%{_mandir} \ > > --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ > > --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ > > --enable-pthreads > Any particular reason for not using %configure? > > Also, here you are not passing --includedir, nevertheless you are using it in > %files. > > > make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" > Why this? Above you are exporting CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", here you are > overriding it with something compatible again? > You're right, I've corrected it, here the spec file after those new points of view. Thank you very much, Ralf. %prep %setup -q %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ %configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ --enable-pthreads #make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" %install make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT #rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/cherokee/sites-enabled/default %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post /sbin/ldconfig ln -s %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-available/default \ %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-enabled/default mkdir -p /home/httpd %postun /sbin/ldconfig %files %{_mandir}/* %{_bindir}/* %{_libdir}/* %{_datadir}/* %{_sbindir}/* %{_includedir}/* %{_sysconfdir}/* /home/httpd/* %changelog *2006-08-16 Manuel Arostegui Ramirez -Misc changes on spec file in order to make it much more polished. Thanks John and Ralf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 08:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160808.k7G8839s008940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-16 03:58 EST ------- Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.4.20060812svn2840.src.rpm Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec Changes: - make setup section quiet - use only tabs for indentation - define libdir in configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 08:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160808.k7G88WrJ008975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-16 03:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > CGAL is a meta-package that requires CGAL-libs, CGAL-devel, and CGAL-sources. > > Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense. > Consider this to be a MUST FIX. > > Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into *-devel. For the moment (CGAL-3.2.1-14), libs are in CGAL-libs, and devel files are in CGAL-devel. > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. > Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX Ok. I thought it was agreed that shell scripts in /etc/profile.d/ should not have shell bangs. If it is really a MUSTFIX, this should be written somewhere, and bugs should be reported, against all almost all package that ship something in /etc/profile.d/ > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > Further issues: > > > > > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > > > IMO, this directory name is too general. > > > > CGAL-3.2.1 ships CORE-1.7, http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core_pages/intro.html > > This directory is from CORE. > And? This doesn't answer my remark. I do not see any solution, here. is the documented way to include CORE headers. If this is a blocker, CORE cannot be into Fedora. That's it. > > > - A more general design problem: > > > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > > > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt > > > > > > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. > > > > Yes, it should only be /usr/include/CGAL/compiler_config.h. Is it a blocker? > Well, there actually are 2 issues with this. > - Package dependencies. You will have to find a way to handle the hard-coded > version dependencies in rpm. Actually, these version macros are not used in CGAL. They are not even documented. They could be pruned. They are used by the CGAL test suite to display dependencies' versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 08:27:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160827.k7G8RCud010101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-16 04:17 EST ------- Hello. -------------------------------------------------------- Again I have to mention that I cannot sponsor you formally because I am not a member of sponsors. You may ask on fedora-extras mailing lists for someone to sponsor you. -------------------------------------------------------- I see lots of rpmlint complaints were removed. mock builds cleanly. Then: * rpmlint: gcin-1.2.1-3.i386.rpm: E: gcin script-without-shellbang /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/gcin --- I suspect the permission of /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/gcin can be 0644 (see /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim.conf in scim). gcin-1.2.1-3.src.rpm: W: gcin strange-permission gcin 0755 --- change the permission of gcin (source 1) to 0644 gcin-debuginfo-1.2.1-3.i386.rpm: gcin-devel-1.2.1-3.i386.rpm: W: gcin-devel no-soname /usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so --- This is unwilling, however, this is a problem of this package, not your packaging. You may tell upstream that a proper soname should be added or you can add a soname by yourself for a moment. By the way, can this file be in devel package, not in main package? (I don't know well about gcin......) * debuginfo rpm is of no use. This is because this package.... A. does not accept CFLAGS. i.e. This package is not built with debug option "-g". Overwrite OPTFLAGS like ----------------------------------------------------------------- in %build stage: make OPTFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" %{?_smp_mflags} ----------------------------------------------------------------- B. This package strips binaries, which is not accepted for fedora packages. Fix makefile not to strip binaries, like ----------------------------------------------------------------- in %prep stage: sed -i.strip -e 's|install[ \t][ \t]*-s|install|' Makefile ----------------------------------------------------------------- With fix by A and B: rpmlint complains: W: gcin non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/gcin -- can be ignored, I think W: gcin-devel no-soname /usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so -- you may ask upstream to fix this. E: gcin-devel shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so -- I don't know well about shared libraries, however, this error means: The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option. Another common mistake that causes this problem is linking with ``gcc -Wl,-shared'' instead of ``gcc -shared''. --- libgcin-im-client.so is made by gcin-im-client.o im-addr.o gcin-conf.o util.o gcin-crypt.o and actually gcin-crypt.o is not compiled with -fpic. gcin-crypt.o is used to make another binary and in this case, gcin-crypt.o should be compiled without -fpic. So I think gcin-crypt.c must be compiled twice with different ways. Fix this. For example: ----------------------------------------------------------------- --- gcin-1.2.1/im-client/Makefile.orig 2006-05-01 18:57:43.000000000 +0900 +++ gcin-1.2.1/im-client/Makefile 2006-08-16 16:55:01.000000000 +0900 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ -DCLIENT_LIB=1 -DGCIN_BIN_DIR=\"$(GCIN_BIN_DIR)\" \ -DDEBUG="0$(GCIN_DEBUG)" -DGCIN_TABLE_DIR=\"$(GCIN_TABLE_DIR)\" \ -DFREEBSD=$(FREEBSD) -OBJS = gcin-im-client.o im-addr.o gcin-conf.o util.o gcin-crypt.o +OBJS = gcin-im-client.o im-addr.o gcin-conf.o util.o gcin-crypt-fpic.o .c.E: $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -E -o $@ $< @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ im-addr.o: ../im-srv/im-addr.c $(CC) -c -fpic $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $< +gcin-crypt-fpic.o: gcin-crypt.c + $(CC) -c -fpic $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $< + clean: rm -f *.o *.so *~ *.E *.db config.mak tags core.* .depend ------------------------------------------------------------------- E: gcin-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gcin-1.2.1/IMdkit/include/IMdkit.h E: gcin-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gcin-1.2.1/IMdkit/include/Xi18n.h E: gcin-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gcin-1.2.1/IMdkit/include/XimProto.h --- fix this with: ------------------------------------------------------------------- in %prep stage: find . -name \*.h -o -name \*.c | xargs chmod ugo-x ------------------------------------------------------------------- * %post and %postun Require something to execute %post (and %postun) properly. e.g. Requires(post): /usr/sbin/alternatives, chkconfig * Requires: Requires: gtk2 >= 2.2.4 atk cairo glib2 pango All of these are not needed because gcin requires libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libatk-1.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 and these libraries require the package above. So explicit requirements of those above are unnecessary. * Again: Check files which this package should have. I suspect that this package should own %{_datadir}/gcin/ The file entry contains: ------------------------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/gcin/* ------------------------------------------------------------------- I think that this must be ------------------------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/gcin/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- , which includes the files under /usr/share/gcin AND the directory /usr/share/gcin . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 08:43:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160843.k7G8hj9F011322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-16 04:34 EST ------- Other issues I noticed now: * /usr/lib/menu/ : this directory is not owned by other packages. So this package should own this directory. * gcin (main) package requires libgcin-im-client.so, so this library should be in main package, not in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 09:31:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 05:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193108] Review Request: libsexymm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160931.k7G9VJFL014510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsexymm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193108 karlthered at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-16 05:21 EST ------- The package has been imported into cvs. The builds succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 09:44:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 05:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608160944.k7G9i8hY015745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-16 05:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134287) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134287&action=view) Twealked spec file The attached spec file works for me, both for mock builds of a regular SRPM, and when inserted into the tarball, using "rpmbuild -ta tarball" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:07:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161007.k7GA7gBZ017547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 05:58 EST ------- Thanks I'll import it right away but I'll wait with the building until frozen-bubble is approved too, so I can build them in quick succession in order to not brake anybody's systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:25:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161025.k7GAPrwl018390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-16 06:16 EST ------- Is Greg really going to review this or should it be reassigned to nobody at fedoraproject.org? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:31:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161031.k7GAVCdO018682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-16 06:21 EST ------- Thanks, problems in comment 24 and comment 25 (comment 28) should be fixed in: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-5.src.rpm I reproduced comment 26: this no longer seems to happen with gnash cvs head fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161032.k7GAWgAY018826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #133235|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:39:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161039.k7GAdxw5019271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 06:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I've seen python programs work with python libraries that don't live in > %{python_sitearch} and figured that perl could work the same way. I know I'vr actually done that with python programs. I think perl can do this too, but don't ask how. > But if that's > a problem, then a Provides: filter should be fine. Its a problem as I lack the nescesarry knowledge to make this happen, so I've added a provides filter. Notice that this filter does not filters out the fb_c_stuff.so()(64bit) provides, even though that is private too, as moving the perl stuff to an other dir wouldn't have removed that provides. This has made me thinking many packages have .so's which are mean't as plugins not as libraries and which thus are kinda private, yet these files are currently listed in the autogenerated provide lists, which doesn't seem entirely correct? REDO FROM START Erm, I just tried installing the version with the filtered provides and that gives me the following error: [hans at shalem SPECS]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/frozen-bubble-1.0.0-8.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl(FBLE) is needed by frozen-bubble-1.0.0-8.x86_64 perl(fb_c_stuff) is needed by frozen-bubble-1.0.0-8.x86_64 perl(fb_stuff) is needed by frozen-bubble-1.0.0-8.x86_64 perl(fbsyms) is needed by frozen-bubble-1.0.0-8.x86_64 So I think that filtering the provides is a bad idea, I think/hope that these provides will even be generated with the perl stuff in another dir, because I'm pretty sure the deps will still be generated since those come from the main script. So I think that filtering them is a bad idea, and we will just have to leave things as they are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:40:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161040.k7GAerAa019340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-16 06:31 EST ------- If greg steps down, I'm happy to take it on (I use it quite regularly anyway) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:44:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161044.k7GAidVj019609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-16 06:35 EST ------- For computation package like this one I think it is much better to keep the static libraries, since the usual reasons for not having static libraries don't hold, while it is very convenient to be able to link models statically to run them on any linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:51:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161051.k7GAp2D1019990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-16 06:41 EST ------- %post gnome gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/hicolor 2>/dev/null || : Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d %pre server /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd This really needs to be checked ala the above link %triggerin -- %handled_pkgs for name in %handled_progs; do for c in $name i386-redhat-linux-$name This is an "out of interest" question - why only i386-redhat? There is no excludearch up there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 10:51:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161051.k7GApRs1020035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-16 06:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Actions(In reply to comment #7) > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. > Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX This is really an ignorable error. These files are sourced and not executed. Most of the files in /etc/profile.d don't have a shebang. > > > - Static libs: > > upstream libcore++. I know that static libraries should be avoided "as far as > > possible", in Fedora. Is the upstream devs choice a sufficient reason? > Formally not, but it's sufficient reason for me not to approve a package and to > classify a package's quality as "low" ;) Although it would be preferable to have dynamic libraries, it is important in my view to have static library for computational packages too, in order to be able to build statically compiled executables to be able to run on any linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 11:14:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161114.k7GBEGvb021631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-08-16 07:04 EST ------- sorry; forgot to upload/announce the updated spec file * Wed Aug 09 2006 Enrico Scholz - 2.18.3-1.6 - bound a %postun script to -gnome subpackage - use %bcond* macros * Sun Jul 09 2006 Enrico Scholz - 2.18.3-1.5 - updated to new fedora-usermgmt code - updated to new ccache path - added distccmon-gnome-icon.png to the pkgdatadir http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc/ I will comment the issues in comment #11 in this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 11:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161130.k7GBUnYS022503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-16 07:21 EST ------- Ping :-) (we're so close!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 12:27:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161227.k7GCRtG8025278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-16 08:18 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-2.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-2.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Aug 15 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.23-2 - Convert tabs to spaces. - Add shell plugin - Get rid of some shebang lines. - Add Google search plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 12:44:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161244.k7GCiCoK026055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-16 08:34 EST ------- Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.5.20060815svn2854.src.rpm Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec Changes: - updated to revision 2854 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 12:44:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161244.k7GCiRQ4026110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-16 08:34 EST ------- It appears that the dir %{_libdir}/quodlibet/ is unowned, easiest fix, imo, change %{_libdir}/quodlibet/_mmkeys.so to simply %{_libdir}/quodlibet/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 13:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161310.k7GDAU44028137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-16 09:00 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-3.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-3.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Aug 16 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.23-3 - Make sure that %%{_libdir}/quodlibet/ is owned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 14:42:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202318] Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161442.k7GEgZWV002616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202318 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-08-16 10:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 14:43:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202319] Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161443.k7GEh8xV002693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202319 Bug 202319 depends on bug 202318, which changed state. Bug 202318 Summary: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202318 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 14:51:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202319] Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161451.k7GEpMEP003290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Compare - Compare perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202319 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-08-16 10:41 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 15:12:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161512.k7GFCumO005513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-16 11:03 EST ------- I have fixed the rpmlint problems. New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.1-4.src.rpm Mamoru Tasaka thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 15:14:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161514.k7GFEfh7005765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2006-08-16 11:04 EST ------- I've discovered a regression during a code cleanup. I'll have new packages out as soon as I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 16:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161604.k7GG4sRD009743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-08-16 11:55 EST ------- > - Static libs: My view on static libs is somewhere between Patrice and Ralf. In situations where upstream does not provide a build mechanism for shared libs then I think it is acceptable for Fedora Extras packagers to ship static libs in -devel (that is, I don't think its necessary to force FE packagers to modify the build files to the extent needed to produce shared instead of static). And, this view is entirely consistent with the Packaging Guidelines as they are currently written. That said, we can always submit patches to the upstream folks and try to help them build and use shared libs. Helping the upstream projects is an honorable thing! :-) In any case, using the latest (-14) SRPM: + significantly cleaned up spec file (good!) + built for me in mock on FC5-i386 + has an ability to work with LEDA but, since LEDA is now proprietary, its fine that we don't try to use it (OK) - has an ability to work with TAUCS and, since TAUCS is LGPL, we should seriously consider packaging it for FE and using it as a CGAL build dependency Anyway, I'll submit a more thorough review later this week... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 16:24:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] New: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/libconfuse/libconfuse.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/libconfuse/libconfuse-2.5-1.src.rpm Description: ----- libConfuse is a configuration file parser library, licensed under the terms of the LGPL, and written in C. It supports sections and (lists of) values (strings, integers, floats, booleans or other sections), as well as some other features (such as single/double-quoted strings, environment variable expansion, functions and nested include statements). It makes it very easy to add configuration file capability to a program using a simple API. The goal of libConfuse is not to be the configuration file parser library with a gazillion of features. Instead, it aims to be easy to use and quick to integrate with your code. ----- Note: the tarball is 'confuse', but the project pages all refer to libconfuse, and both suse and debian package this as libconfuse as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161711.k7GHBS26014278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-16 13:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134326) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134326&action=view) build log of gcin-1.2.1-4 in mock -------------------------------------------------------- Again I have to mention that I cannot sponsor you formally because I am not a member of sponsors. You may ask on fedora-extras mailing lists for someone to sponsor you. -------------------------------------------------------- Well, * rpmlint is clean. * debuginfo rpm is created correctly. I think now you may well ask for someone to sponsor you because I cannot sponsor you and I cannot approve your package. 2 points: * I cannot check this other than on i386 machine (because I only have i386 machine), however, on x86_64, libraries may be installed on /usr/lib64. You may have to configure gcin-i386.conf and also change its name according to architecture (for example, by using %{_arch} ). For example, qt-3.3.6-12.x86_64 has qt-x86_64.conf with entry "/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib". * I cannot build this in mock (local build okay). Perhaps qt-devel or so is missing for BR? Please check my build log attached. Again, I only tested packaging issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:18:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161718.k7GHIP9W014954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-16 13:08 EST ------- Still missing glib2-devel in BuildRequires. Also missing mono-devel Missing a %clean section. Doesn't build on x86_64, pkgconfig is not finding mono. checking for mono >= 1.1.13 glib-2.0 >= 2.0.0 ... Package mono was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `mono.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'mono' found configure: error: Library requirements (mono >= 1.1.13 glib-2.0 >= 2.0.0 ) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. mono-devel does provide /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/mono.pc on x86_64. The redefining _libdir part should go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161739.k7GHdYBk016923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-16 13:30 EST ------- Well, qt-devel seems sufficient for missing buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:43:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161743.k7GHhSCA017371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-16 13:33 EST ------- Thanks Paul. If you will look at Paul's working spec file you can see the issue... With desktop-file-install it adds the vendor to the filename, so your files section needs to change from: %{_datadir}/applications/clusterssh.desktop to %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-clusterssh.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161744.k7GHiJVx017430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-16 13:34 EST ------- Adding a directory to Perl's library search path is as simple as sticking: use lib '/blah'; near the top of the script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:48:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161748.k7GHmv0S017801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Adding a directory to Perl's library search path is as simple as sticking: > > use lib '/blah'; > > near the top of the script. > > Thanks, does that work for binary stuff (.so) which is hidden under an auto dir too? Also should regular perl apps but their stuff in a seperate dir. The current behaviour is upstreams default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161749.k7GHndro017877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-16 13:40 EST ------- Oops!! * debuginfo rpm is created correctly. Well, no. It is not. debuginfo contains no debug information. Build log shows: gcc -Wall -O -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 ...... This means that codes are compiled with no debug option (-g). You must change the optional flag of compilation so that gcc is called with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS . You can see from my build log that $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used in compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:58:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202836] New: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/abuse.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/abuse-0.7.0-1.src.rpm Description: This is the SDL version of Abuse, the classic Crack-Dot-Com game. It can run in a window or fullscreen and it has stereo sound with sound panning. --- notice that the name could be discussed, I didn't name it abuse-sdl or abuse_sdl because this is THE abuse for Linux, I checked other distro's and only debian has got the original version and that contains a note in its "%description" that it is discontinued and that users are adviced to use the SDL version instead. This requires a form of abuse-data I'm also submitting fRaBs I'll post a link to the fRaBs review here as soon as I've got one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 17:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202837] New: Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202837 Summary: Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/fRaBs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/fRaBs-2.10-1.src.rpm Description: Free data files for Abuse, the classic Crack-Dot-Com game. --- Notice that this requires abuse itself to be usefull, see bug 202836 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 18:00:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161800.k7GI01JP019105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-08-16 13:50 EST ------- Thanks for your help Spec URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh.spec SRPM URL: http://queeg.dyndns.org/clusterssh/clusterssh-3.19.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 18:00:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161800.k7GI0p1E019211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-16 13:51 EST ------- The fRaBs review is bug 202837 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 18:14:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161814.k7GIEDR3020983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-16 14:04 EST ------- Great! I'm really looking forward to having this in extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 18:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161830.k7GIUnvY022882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-16 14:21 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC5 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 18:53:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177507] Review Request: pida In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161853.k7GIrHrV025876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(che666 at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 18:54:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202701] Review Request: python-xeninst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161854.k7GIsl56026073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xeninst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202701 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-08-16 14:44 EST ------- Built and comps change made (well, as soon as intltool finishes translation merging anyway) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 19:07:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161907.k7GJ7RUw027134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 19:39:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161939.k7GJd5O0029868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-16 15:29 EST ------- - there is a missing defattr line in the devel package - the devel package should go into Development/Libraries instead of System Environment/Libraries otherwise it looks good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 19:49:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202853] New: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfut.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfut-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Media updater tool for WorldForge applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 19:51:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161951.k7GJp4vH031424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-16 15:41 EST ------- Thanks for poking at it, both issues are remedied in a -2 build: http://wilsonet.com/packages/libconfuse/libconfuse.spec http://wilsonet.com/packages/libconfuse/libconfuse-2.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 19:51:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202853] Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161951.k7GJpCD9031434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198839 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 19:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608161951.k7GJpIfx031447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202853 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 20:00:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162000.k7GK0qWf000507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-16 15:51 EST ------- Review: - no rpmlint output on any package - package name OK - spec file name OK, is in English and is legible - package meets the Packaging Guidelines - license OK (LGPL) and is included - source matches upstream 4bc9b73d77ebd571ac834619ce0b3582 confuse-2.5.tar.gz 4bc9b73d77ebd571ac834619ce0b3582 confuse-2.5.tar.gz.1 - compiles and builds at least on i386 (FC4 and devel) - BuildRequires are correct - localized files are handled with %find_lang - has shared lib with appropriate ldconfig calls - does not create any directory - no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr - has %clean section - consistent use of macros - contains code - no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime - devel subpackage required and present, contains pkgconfig file - no .la libtool archives - not a GUI application - it works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 20:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162031.k7GKVfL8004009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-16 16:22 EST ------- Taucs suffers the "static-only-libs" problem too. And its build/config system is really strange. Let us see if CGAL can be include in FE, then I will handle Taucs as a further step (CGAL libraries do not depend on Taucs: only the templates library, in headers, do). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 20:31:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162031.k7GKVqW8004050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-16 16:22 EST ------- Thanks much, package imported and built for devel branch, FC5 branch pending. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 20:52:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202398] Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162052.k7GKqC7o006345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-16 16:42 EST ------- Okay, I'll give you a review. MUST ITEMS: * rpmlint doesn't show anything * package is named good * ! improper spec file name, change it to python-musicbrainz2.spec * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with open-source compatible license (BSD) * license file is included in %doc * spec file is written in American English * spec file is legible * upstream md5sum matches md5sum of the source used to build the package (2ff59193f357c84e9e7b2f89356c0939) * BR is listed properly * there is no locales * there is no need to ldconfig * package is not designed to be relocatable * package own directories correctly * permissions are set correctly * package has a good %clean section * package handles macros properly * there is no need to -doc subpackage * %doc doesn't affect runtime * there is no need to -devel subpackage * package doesn't contain any .la files * no gui WHAT TO DO: * correct spec file name, only to show that it is correct ;) * package owns test command, so you should add %check section to spec file and run %{__python} setup.py test in it If you do what I mention above, I'll approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 20:53:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202398] Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162053.k7GKrWAV006576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mr.ecik at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 20:57:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162057.k7GKv1bG006982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-16 16:47 EST ------- The downloads page has all source rpms so I assume this srpm is the canonical source. I agree with the rest of comment 15. The scripts in %install seemed to have worked around the warning in the python packaging guidelines about INSATLLED_FILES and directories. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Needs work: rpm added a Requires of python(abi) = 2.4. This makes Requiring python >= 2.3 redundant on FC4+. Good: + noarch + permissions + uses setuptools + clean section + macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:14:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162114.k7GLEKC9009462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-16 17:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.30-1.src.rpm Bump to new version Fixes the problems listed above. The mono hack is currently okay (grudgingly) I have a feeling that when this is approved, that monodevelop will be able to use it as well :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162119.k7GLJRTh010001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-08-16 17:09 EST ------- """ Source0: does not contain a URL to the upstream tarball. I'd consider this a blocker unless somehow there is no upstream other than this package. """ I am the upstream; the SRPM is canonical. This app is not expected to work outside of RHEL4+/FC5+ without modification. Seeing it includes kickstart features (which are already very distro specific) that shouldn't be a problem. -------------- "Really odd for the sticky bit to be set on a spec file." Fixed. -------------- """ W: cobbler setup-not-quiet Not a big deal; pass -q to the %setup macro if you want to quiet this. """ Fixed. ---------------------------- """ cobbler non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cobbler/gui.py 0644 """ Fixed. That file should not have been in the release. -------------------- rpmlint on both RPM's yields no output at this point and unit tests pass. New versions: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler-0.1.1-5.src.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/cobbler-0.1.1-5.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:21:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162121.k7GLLgKw010161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-16 17:12 EST ------- mono-devel does provide /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/mono.pc on x86_64. No. mono-libs-devel provides the mono.pc file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:25:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202876] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202876 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Alias/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-Alias-1.0-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-Alias.spec Description: Aliasing is the phenomenon where two different expressions actually refer to the same thing. Modifying one will modify the other, and if you take a reference to both, the two values are the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:25:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202876] Review Request: perl-Data-Alias In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162125.k7GLPv41010617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202876 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:27:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162127.k7GLR2NL010785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-16 17:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/brandy.spec Updated the spec file (the src.rpm is the same) Adds in the perl hack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:34:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202398] Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162134.k7GLYPOE011664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-16 17:24 EST ------- > WHAT TO DO: > * correct spec file name, only to show that it is correct ;) The spec file is renamed on the web site so that I can keep multiple revisions online. The spec file inside the SRPM is named according to the guidelines. > * package owns test command, so you should add %check section > to spec file and run %{__python} setup.py test in it Done. In addition, I noticed that there are a couple of more packages that are Required for full functionality. Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/python-musicbrainz2-0.3.1-2.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/python-musicbrainz2-0.3.1-2.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Aug 16 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.3.1-2 - Add Requires for python-ctypes and libmusicbrainz. - Add check section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:37:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162137.k7GLb884011993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-08-16 17:27 EST ------- """ rpm added a Requires of python(abi) = 2.4. This makes Requiring python >= 2.3 redundant on FC4+. """ There's a good reason for this. Currently the same SRPM file can be used to build the RPM on RHEL4/Centos, which is desirable to preserve. The noarch has a 2.4 abi because it was built using distutils on a FC5 system. Cobbler itself will build on either platform as it only requires Python 2.3 (no Python 2.4 features and no extensions included). Using the example of IETF RFC 2119 the Wiki entry about abi appears to be more of a "SHOULD NOT" than a "MUST NOT". The redundancy will not break a build system or RPM, so it shouldn't be a problem. If it is, it can be dealt with, though it seems sensible to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:44:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162144.k7GLi3FB012911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-08-16 17:34 EST ------- Updating koan to match comments made on the cobbler submission (setup not quiet, odd permission on spec file) http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan-0.1.1-5.src.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan-0.1.1-5.noarch.rpm http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/cobbler/koan.spec rpmlint is clean on both rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 21:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202398] Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162158.k7GLw5mj015407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-16 17:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The spec file is renamed on the web site so that I can keep multiple revisions > online. The spec file inside the SRPM is named according to the guidelines. Right. Okay, now everything looks fine. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:13:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162213.k7GMDW7w017054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-16 18:03 EST ------- New record for quickest review approval ? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:20:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202853] Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162220.k7GMKxuP017359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Alias: wfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |wfut ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-16 18:11 EST ------- This one loses the "BR: autoconf automake" as they aren't needed anymore: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfut.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfut-1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:22:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162222.k7GMMirk017477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-08-16 18:13 EST ------- * Wed Aug 16 2006 Enrico Scholz - 2.18.3-1.8 - simplified LSB initscripts and support only one $DISTCC_OPTS variable - ship sample sysconfig file for LSB - use rpm macros to create the platform tuple instead of hardcoding 'i386-redhat-linux' - added '%%bcond_without fedora' http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc/ ===== comment #8: ----------- > But the file /etc/sysconfig/distccd is missing in your installation. it will be read only, when existing. Hence, there is no real need to ship it. For documentation purposes, I added it in the current package > I would furthermore suggest not to test for readability (-r) but for > existance (-a)of the sysconf-file. I do not see problems with '-r' > E: distcc-server-lsb non-standard-gid /var/run/distccd distcc > E: distcc-server-lsb non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/distccd 0775 > > That should be fixed, I guess. permissions/group are fine comment #11: ------------ > %post gnome > gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/hicolor 2>/dev/null || : > > Please check > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d is ok; the 'touch ...' in the sample scriptlet might be from old FC when 'gtk-update-icon-cache' did not know the '-f' flag. I do not see sense in checking for existence first: the command will be called with trailing '|| :' and potential error messages redirected into /dev/null > %pre server > /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd package should have the corresponding 'Requires(pre): fedora-usermgmt' > for c in $name i386-redhat-linux-$name > > This is an "out of interest" question - why only i386-redhat? thx; I compose the platform tuple from rpm macros now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162225.k7GMP7KR017763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Component|Package Review |openbabel OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778, 177841, 197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:25:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162225.k7GMPGNF017807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 holbrookbw at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |181445 Bug 197974 depends on bug 181445, which changed state. Bug 181445 Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:26:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162226.k7GMQETa017949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-16 18:16 EST ------- All the outstanding issues from comment #8 appear to be fixed, everything looks good to me, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once this package is imported and built for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:30:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162230.k7GMUC5C018332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-16 18:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen-5.8.5-1.src.rpm Bump to new version It has the /etc/alternatives in now and has renamed the binaries to autogen.* When I run rpmlint over it though, there are errors which I can't quite suss out, mainly as the alternatives binaries are set at 2755 rather than the more usual 755 - I'm guessing this is down to them being alternatives. The code was copied from sendmail, so if this is wrong, that is as well! Looks okay in mock (i386) and works fine on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 22:32:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162232.k7GMWuvS018521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-16 18:23 EST ------- Sorry - not been that well recently, I'm usually out of it by about 9.30pm (British Summer Time). It's 2nd on my list for tomorrow's reviews. Who knows, it may even be good to go (TM) by this time tomorrow! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:00:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162300.k7GN0OI1019791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|openbabel |Package Review OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841, 197974 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-16 18:50 EST ------- Somehow things got a bit screwed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:00:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162300.k7GN0fDq019855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|181445 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:24:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162324.k7GNOD9N020762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-16 19:14 EST ------- I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is named abuse_sdl. My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for package name, but that's just me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:30:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162330.k7GNUUGV021125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-16 19:20 EST ------- I fixed all above problems. New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.1-5.src.rpm I only have i386 machine (no x86_64 machine), Tasaka can you help me to test it? If all is right, then I may start to ask for someone to sponsor me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:39:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] New: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine-0.7-2.src.rpm Description: pgFouine is a PostgreSQL log analyzer. It generates text or HTML reports from PostgreSQL log files. These reports contain the list of the slowest queries, the queries that take the most time and so on. pgFouine can also: - analyze VACUUM VERBOSE output to help you improve your VACUUM strategy, - generate Tsung sessions file to benchmark your PostgreSQL server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:39:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162339.k7GNdvct021682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202905] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202905 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Server-HTTP/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP-0.09-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP.spec Description: POE::Component::Server::HTTP (PoCo::HTTPD) is a framework for building custom HTTP servers based on POE. It is loosely modeled on the ideas of apache and the mod_perl/Apache module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:56:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202905] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162356.k7GNux5v022315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202905 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 16 23:58:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608162358.k7GNwlu9022382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-16 19:49 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/crm114.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/crm114-0-0.1.20060704.src.rpm Changed the versioning like we discussed on IRC. Fixed all of the above, too. Added %check. Referenced the bug in tre which prevents x86_64 version from working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202908] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202908 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC-0.05-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC.spec Description: POE::Component::Server::XMLRPC is a bolt-on component that can publish a event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:08:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202908] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170008.k7H08BT7022737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202908 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202905 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:08:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202905] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170008.k7H08Csf022757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202905 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202908 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202910] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202910 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Server- SimpleHTTP/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-1.11-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP.spec Description: This module makes serving up HTTP requests a breeze in POE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:26:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202910] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170026.k7H0QJfg023326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202910 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202913] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202913 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Server-SOAP/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP-1.09-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP.spec Description: This module makes serving SOAP/1.1 requests a breeze in POE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:51:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202913] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170051.k7H0ppqO024098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202913 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202910 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 00:51:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202910] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170051.k7H0ppAL024102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202910 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202913 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 01:51:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] Review Request: MemProf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170151.k7H1pAfH025837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MemProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2006-08-16 21:41 EST ------- I don't think we really need this in core. Extras should be fine. I'll look at the packaging problems, but probably not right away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 02:05:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] Review Request: MemProf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170205.k7H25atD026213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MemProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sandmann at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 02:33:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170233.k7H2XnNx027535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-16 22:23 EST ------- Greetings. Here's a review: OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 94273fc16a35123f1d3003f1080bf2c0 sexy-python-0.1.8.tar.gz 94273fc16a35123f1d3003f1080bf2c0 sexy-python-0.1.8.tar.gz.1 See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used. n/a - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage. n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage. n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. See below - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. The spec says the license is LGPL, but the COPYING file is the GPL, and there's nothing else that says it's LGPL. Can you get upstream to clarify? 2. No need to include the generic INSTALL document. There is no useful information in it. 3. Package doesn't built in mock. Missing BuildRequires: libxml2-devel. 4. python_sitelib isn't used, can remove the first line of the spec where it's defined? 5. rpmlint output: W: python-sexy setup-not-quiet setup-not-quiet : You should use -q to have a quiet extraction of the source tarball, as this generate useless lines of log ( for buildbot, for example ) (removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as you were already sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 02:52:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170252.k7H2qxDD028691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-16 22:43 EST ------- Build failed on devel x86_64. RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/menu/gcin* File not found: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-gcin.so File not found: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods/libqgcin.so File not found: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/gcin/libgcin-im-client.so As you might guess this is not getting libdir set correctly. From looking at the custom configure script I believe you can just do %configure libdir=%{_libdir} in your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 03:40:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170340.k7H3ehXF031027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-16 23:30 EST ------- I update it for lib64 problems. New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.1-6.src.rpm John Mahowald can you help me to build it on x86_64 again and see if it still failure? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 03:51:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170351.k7H3p2KO031809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-16 23:41 EST ------- %configure should set libdir automatically (in this case, the macro includes "--libdir=/usr/lib64"), but some things still ignore it. In any case, I grabbed and build -6 and now the build doesn't complete. It gets down to the qt bit and fails: gmake[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gcin-1.2.1/qt-im' /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/moc qgcininputcontextplugin.h -o qgcininputcontextplugin.h_moc.cpp gmake[3]: /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/moc: Command not found gmake[3]: *** [qgcininputcontextplugin.o] Error 127 I've no idea what's happening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 03:51:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170351.k7H3pd1O031861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 04:02:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170402.k7H42BN6032601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-16 23:52 EST ------- Looks good to me. The CFLAGS hack is kind of nasty but to my eyes it produces a proper set of flags and the resulting package is fine. I'm going to go ahead and approve this; I didn't get much guidance on the subject of whether the examples should be included as %doc (instead of living in %_datadir) so I'm not going to block on it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 04:55:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170455.k7H4tkfK003352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-17 00:46 EST ------- There are many problems about lib64 in the source code, I try my test to make a patch for it. Hope this time can fix all the problems. Please help me to build it on x86_64 machine. New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.1-7.src.rpm Also, I will report the issues to the upstream, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 05:39:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170539.k7H5dOgD004695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-17 01:29 EST ------- It was carefully prepared so the formal part was easy for me. PS: you should close the bug now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 06:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170611.k7H6BSOT005400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 02:01 EST ------- You missed one tab, in Source58. You should package COPYING, HACKING, NEWS and README as %doc. Also, what's the upstream for google.py? From the looks of things, it's you, which would be OK. It seems to me that there must be a simpler way to copy 50 sources into place. The README file says there are unit tests included, but I don't see them in the package. I built this for i386 and installed it on my home machine; it seems to run OK but I saw this odd bit on startup: Introspect error: The name org.gajim.dbus was not provided by any .service files I found errors with four plugins: ImportError: No module named musicbrainz ImportError: No module named CDDB ImportError: No module named lastfm ImportError: No module named path I guess the first three are optional requirements, which should be OK. The last one is odd; here's the full backtrace: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/quodlibet/plugins/songsmenu/shell.2.py", line 11, in ? import os File "/usr/lib/python2.4/os.py", line 133, in ? from os.path import (curdir, pardir, sep, pathsep, defpath, extsep, altsep, ImportError: No module named path In addition, I chose View->File System and got this backtrace: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/quodlibet/qltk/quodlibet.py", line 518, in select_browser self.browser = Browser(library, player) File "/usr/share/quodlibet/browsers/filesystem.py", line 67, in __init__ dt = DirectoryTree(initial=const.HOME, folders=folders) File "/usr/share/quodlibet/qltk/filesel.py", line 68, in __init__ folders = filter(is_folder, folders) UnboundLocalError: local variable 'is_folder' referenced before assignment I exited the program which left the default view that way and now neither quodlibet nor exfalso will start. These are probably issues for upstream, but I just wanted to make sure that something wasn't missing from the package. For some reason I don't get any desktop menu entry, even though the desktop file looks OK to me. (I use KDE.) Review: * All 9000 source files match upstream: 195c39433b4e2a5bf930af7570b61f3e quodlibet-0.23.tar.gz 0b7d2ff31c4c113b52b74e1b8c867843 albumart.py 2385a15ea0f8c4ccbcf347eb9e5ef174 _amazon.py b5f85eb37b75acba938d082913d31b32 animosd.py 17421585b258ac44a0c04a50f06b25da ape2id3.py 680c7f7df3ac0cd949daa153c419e451 automask.py f3d86669ab18d4c25075212943cd74e1 autorating.py 9a984fb37453ff86ac861b01b31f6594 bookmarks.py 3865f4f3ece8d667c20fe3b8d34418dd brainz.py ab800ac4b48a0a228f1504914f198b5a browsefolders.py ae0be895b7441c9d38b0d8725f53f46c cddb.py 73c4409dfbdc8a9d8b7cd1a04f86ac23 clock.py c898ef2d38ad04b64137f0b6a8845852 fixlatin1tags.py 0fb2b513d89026c809b77c423c5080f8 gajim_status.py ae32b874d01fb16bed24626602ed2a98 html.py 4b71dfdbed6d5e8248028f62a3290888 iconv.py cd8f349983822b0429ef36d51c506992 ifp.py 4fd524e514cb0da6714628c7c1078242 importexport.py 57c82a80c4f30f6ac9b87801e7c80728 iradiolog.py d73546846d3280d0d3b2548a97bd8991 jep118.py 692f212693a86de9858e4979d6cec1b6 k3b.py 437ab5e65b7788641880b1ff7f4ae9f4 kakasi.py 57cf89358975fc75267bbff6d629749f lastfmsubmit.py c235836bb4b3f0480f674b6d21996407 nautilus.py 2a140f01260cb7dc5fc89f95fe11b4e0 notify.py d9868612bc1a13536f37d321bd4748d2 qlscrobbler.py 77dd97961b563ce6a0e0e596d98c39fe randomalbum.py f179c4db522561eed1629854b8de3a4d replaygain.py cb8f5b018503b2f0ad44fc10fc0bd3be reset.py dbd51ebd76b5a8e0a23558480c79da7b resub.py e5fc6a506f63de6f9661d2ded274d70d splitting.py 09c6da4082b6aa33d998991be7c508a8 _subprocobj.py 18ba6a789e95d5d202d911d826d94747 titlecase.py 12a36f1cc82b14cb25ba54b3d84503c8 trayicon.py 87065bf6d3b2084ca1a1c1f06f2b3f6c wikipedia.py 705e734f3d755a1e05854bc68ed90f6a write_cover.py Source58, pulled manually according to the comments, also matches: 5a9d7e599fab9be828a6244ee12e3542 shell.2.py?format=raw No upstream for google.py * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. X license is open source-compatible. License text upstream but not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint is silent (just one tab) * final provides and requires are sane: _mmkeys.so()(64bit) quodlibet = 0.23-3.fc6 = /usr/bin/env gnome-python2-libegg gstreamer-python >= 0.10 libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) pygtk2 >= 2.8 python >= 2.4 python-mutagen >= 1.5 vorbisgain ? %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual testing reveals a few problems; see above. * shared libraries are present, but they aren't in the ld search path. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * desktop file looks correct and is installed properly. (Note that I don't get a desktop menu entry, but I don't see anything wrong with the desktop file.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 07:05:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170705.k7H75Nlr007098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-17 02:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is > named abuse_sdl. My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for package > name, but that's just me. I can live with that too, but as said this really is THE abuse now these days hence my dropping of the -/_ sdl I don't want people to start looking for the main abuse package, cause there won't be one. But as said either way is eventually fine by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 07:15:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170715.k7H7FHsg007518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From reuben-redhatbugzilla at reub.net 2006-08-17 03:05 EST ------- I've just attempted to rebuild the SRPM, and I get this: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS -fomit-frame-pointer -Wno-missing-prototypes -Wno-missing-declarations -DZAPATA_PRI -DIAX_TRUNKING -DCRYPTO -fPIC -c -o chan_phone.o chan_phone.c chan_phone.c:41:29: error: linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory chan_phone.c: In function 'phone_write': chan_phone.c:750: warning: value computed is not used make[1]: *** [chan_phone.o] Error 1 Perhaps another buildreq missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 07:16:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170716.k7H7GldW007650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-17 03:07 EST ------- Any chance we can get some progress on this, this is blocking the building of perl-SDL as I want to build them in quick succession so that it doesn't break peoples systems from updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 07:39:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170739.k7H7dfrZ009259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-17 03:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > Actions(In reply to comment #7) > > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > > > > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. > > Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX > > This is really an ignorable error. Well, agreed, it's minor error, nevertheless it's an error and easy to fix. > These files are sourced and not > executed. Then they should NOT be executable => chmod -x > Most of the files in /etc/profile.d don't have a shebang. Just because others are sloppy, doesn't mean I need to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 07:41:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170741.k7H7fcKL009373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-17 03:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec > SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.1-7.src.rpm These seem OK for i386. Build is fine, rpmlint is clean, debuginfo is correct (this time it is really okay) and these seems to work well on i386. However, I only have i386 machine so I cannot check this on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 08:44:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608170844.k7H8iQoe013769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-17 04:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > the alternatives binaries are set at 2755 rather than the more > usual 755 - I'm guessing this is down to them being alternatives. The code was > copied from sendmail, so if this is wrong, that is as well! That has nothing to do with alternatives. The sendmail executable is intentionally setgid smmsp [0], but having setgid root ones in this package sounds like a plain packaging bug which is also possibly a security issue. [0] http://www.sendmail.org/security/secure-install.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 10:20:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171020.k7HAK08v019862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-17 06:10 EST ------- Current srpm is in comment #12. I hope I can release this srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 10:34:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171034.k7HAYl2K020629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-17 06:24 EST ------- http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2006-July/021652.html(In reply to comment #50) > > > Perhaps another buildreq missing? Something changed kernel-wise: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2006-July/021652.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 11:58:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171158.k7HBwMXh025416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-17 07:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > These files are sourced and not > > executed. > Then they should NOT be executable => chmod -x Agreed. It is patch in my spec file. Maybe should someone fill bugs about other packages that share that issue. I do not know how to use XML-XPC. >> TODO-latter (In reply to comment #8) > - A more general design problem: > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt The CGAL_FOOBAR_VERSION macros are not used in CGAL, actually. They are here only for internal uses (to be displayed by the testsuite). I can prune that from the package. > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. The endianness detection has been fixed in the upstream SVN repository yesterday, from your comment #10. It now uses macros, and no longer hard-code endianness. I will backport the patch in the src.rpm package. (In reply to comment #8) > Further issues: > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > IMO, this directory name is too general. > > - Static libs: > /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a > /usr/lib/libcore++.a These two issue last. And I do not see how to deal with that (especially the /usr/include/CORE issue, which cannot be fixed without changing CORE documentation and uses). (In reply to comment #10) > > CGAL is a meta-package that requires CGAL-libs, CGAL-devel, and CGAL-sources. > > Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense. > Consider this to be a MUST FIX. > > Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into *-devel. As I said in comment #11, libs already are in CGAL-libs, and devel files are in CGAL-devel. I do not understand your point. What is the contradiction with Fedora conventions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 12:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171204.k7HC4VLB025745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |CGAL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 13:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171320.k7HDKpIg029674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 09:11 EST ------- Sorry - been under the weather recently. I should have this done in the next 24 hours or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 13:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] New: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/aqsis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/aqsis-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Aqsis is a high quality, photorealistic, 3D rendering solution. It complies with the Renderman? interface standard defined by Pixar. Aqsis comprises a command line rendering tool, a tool for compiling shaders in the RSL language, a tool for preparing textures for optimal use, and various developer libraries to enable integration with third party tools. Notes to reviewer: - The latest stable release is not happy with g++ 4, so the package requires g++ 3.4 and adds some patching to remove CXXFLAGS options that g++ 3.4 doesn't like. Current CVS snapshots are ok with g++4, so this will disappear when 1.1 is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 13:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171328.k7HDSXBB029998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-17 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense. > > Consider this to be a MUST FIX. > > > > Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into > *-devel. > > As I said in comment #11, libs already are in CGAL-libs, and devel files are > in CGAL-devel. I do not understand your point. What is the contradiction with > Fedora conventions? CGAL would be assumed to contain runtime libs and/or applications and must not depend on *-devel. I would rename CGAL-libs into CGAL and drop the current CGAL entirely. It doesn't make sense. Alternatively, if you want to keep *-libs, just drop CGAL entirely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 13:32:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202033] Review Request: deltarpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171332.k7HDWBDd030259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deltarpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 ------- Additional Comments From riek at redhat.com 2006-08-17 09:22 EST ------- Even non-standard yum plugins are in System Environment/Base, so I guess this goes there as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 13:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171345.k7HDjV9G031058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-17 09:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > New record for quickest review approval ? :-) I was wondering that myself. :p (In reply to comment #6) > It was carefully prepared so the formal part was easy for me. I do put quite a bit of effort into trying to make the reviewer's job as easy as possible (and its a relativley simple package). :) > PS: you should close the bug now Not quite yet, still waiting on the FC5 branch to be created. Once that's done, I'll close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 14:16:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171416.k7HEGdSD000624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-17 10:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > the alternatives binaries are set at 2755 rather than the more > > usual 755 - I'm guessing this is down to them being alternatives. The code was > > copied from sendmail, so if this is wrong, that is as well! > > That has nothing to do with alternatives. The sendmail executable is > intentionally setgid smmsp [0], but having setgid root ones in this package > sounds like a plain packaging bug which is also possibly a security issue. Specifically, these lines: %attr (2755, root, root)/%{_bindir}/autogen.columns %attr (2755, root, root)/%{_bindir}/autogen.getdefs Which should probably be: %{_bindir}/autogen.columns %{_bindir}/autogen.getdefs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 14:18:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171418.k7HEIVW7000782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-17 10:08 EST ------- Hi * updated spec: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/python-sexy.spec * updated srpm: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/python-sexy-0.1.8-1.src.rpm * Issues: 1/ I send a mail to Christian Hammond and Raphael Slinckx the authors of the bindings to clear that issue. For the moment, the spec says it's GPL waiting sexy-python maintainers answer. 2/ That's OK for me, done. 3/ Tested under Mock: it builds fine now. 4/ That's OK for me, done. 5/ Thank you for the advice. rpmlint output : [build at localhost result]$ rpmlint -i python-sexy-0.1.8-4.i386.rpm [build at localhost result]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 14:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171421.k7HELaTa000984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-17 10:12 EST ------- Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-15.fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec %changelog * Thu Aug 17 2006 Laurent Rineau - 3.2.1-15 - Change the permissions of /etc/profile.d/cgal.*sh - Remove the meta package CGAL. CGAL-libs is renamed CGAL. - Added two patchs: - CGAL-3.2.1-config.h-endianness_detection.patch which is an upstream patch to fix the endianness detection, so that is is no longer hard-coded in , - CGAL-3.2.1-install_cgal-no_versions_in_compiler_config.h.patch that removes hard-coded versions in . I have new errors from rpmlint: E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh E: CGAL-devel non-executable-script /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh 0644 E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh E: CGAL-devel non-executable-script /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh 0644 that comes from the new permissions of those files. And two new warnings: W: CGAL-devel non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh W: CGAL-devel non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh that could be fixed easily. Reporter Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) Assigned To Ed Hill (ed at eh3.com) Save Changes Bug Comments Opened by Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-07-17 13:36 EST [reply] Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-13-fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec Description: Computational Geometry Algorithms Library CGAL is a collaborative effort of several sites in Europe and Israel. The goal is to make the most important of the solutions and methods developed in computational geometry available to users in industry and academia in a C++ library. The goal is to provide easy access to useful, reliable geometric algorithms. Homepage: http://www.cgal.org/ Packager notes: * With CGAL-3.2.1, the tarball has been pruned from documentation files with undecided license, in order to make packaging possible. * A Debian package has been submitted, and has been accepted http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251885 * Whereas the Debian packager choose to extract the core++ library and put it in a separate package, I choose to ship libcore++.a in the CGAL package. It could be modified, if needed. * rpmlint shows several errors or warnings. Some of them come from the meta-package CGAL that requires all sub-packages. * The -devel sub-package ships several static library. It is because upstream developers do not want to maintain SOMAJOR numbers for them, now, for libcore++.a, and libCGALQt.a 20060801173634 Comment #1 From Dennis Gilmore (dennis at ausil.us) on 2006-08-01 17:36 EST [reply] static linking is highly frowned upon http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for more info developer laziness is generally not considered a good enough reason. Looking at the sepc all those macros make the spec file confusing. Dont redefine name version and release. you need full urls to the upstream source tarball. I really sugegst reading the packaging guidelines and doing some work on them 20060802035012 Comment #2 From Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-08-02 03:50 EST [reply] 1/ I know that static libraries should be avoided, when possible (see my not in comment #1). In that case, the upstream developpers do not provide shared library for libCGALQt.a and libcore++.a. For libcore++, I could package Core separately (http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core/download/core_v1.7/). But, for libCGALQt.a, do you see a solution? Waiting for the next release which could have shared version for all libraries cannot be a solution: CGAL releases come each year. It was really a chance that I manage to make the documention files removed from the upstream tarball of CGAL-3.2.1 (for license issues). 2/ As regards the macros... yes I know. This spec file is configurable, so that it can be applied to internal release of CGAL as well. What do you mean by redefining name of version or release? If I am not wrong, the conditionals make them be defined only once. If reviewers agreed that it is two much, I will pruned the spec file to remove the macro, as if the default values were hard-coded. 3/ For the upstream source tarball, I do not understand your point. spectool (from package fedora-rpmdevtools) can understand the macros and give the full URLs. I know pretty well the packaging guidelines. Please give me pointers to paragraphs that I could have missed. 20060814221318 Comment #3 From Ed Hill (ed at eh3.com) on 2006-08-14 22:13 EST [reply] Hi Laurent, I'm interested in reviewing CGAL but am getting a 404 Not Found error when trying to download the SRPM. Is this submission still active? 20060815041708 Comment #4 From Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-08-15 04:17 EST [reply] Sorry. The url is there: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-13.fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec I am thinking about simplifying the spec file. Tell me what you think about it. 20060815105259 Comment #5 From Ed Hill (ed at eh3.com) on 2006-08-15 10:52 EST [reply] Hi Laurent, thanks for fixing the URL! I grabbed the SRPM and am looking through it. I agree with you that it would be a very good idea to cleanup the spec file and remove all the bits that are unnecessary for Fedora Extras (eg. all the internal_release, prefix, build_doc, etc. macros). As soon as you have a slimmed-down SRPM available, please post it and I'll start doing a thorough review. 20060815185744 Comment #6 From Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-08-15 18:57 EST [reply] Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-14.fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec I have pruned the spec files from non Fedora stuff. I eventually admit that the spec file is complicated enough, even now: the %install stage is quite complicated, as the upstream installation process is not yet well adapted to Fedora Extras requirements. 20060816010647 Comment #7 From Ralf Corsepius (rc040203 at freenet.de) on 2006-08-16 01:06 EST [reply] I must be missing something very basic: # rpm -qlp CGAL-3.2.1-14.i386.rpm /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1 /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.FREE_USE /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.LGPL /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.QPL /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/README.Fedora This doesn't look like a reasonable packaging to me. Also: # rpmlint CGAL-*3.2.1-14.i386.rpm E: CGAL devel-dependency CGAL-devel E: CGAL no-binary W: CGAL-devel no-dependency-on CGAL E: CGAL-devel file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/CGAL/make/makefile E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh 20060816025233 Comment #8 From Ralf Corsepius (rc040203 at freenet.de) on 2006-08-16 02:52 EST [reply] Further issues: - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE IMO, this directory name is too general. - Static libs: /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a /usr/lib/libcore++.a - A more general design problem: Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. 20060816031135 Comment #9 From Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-08-16 03:11 EST [reply] Actions(In reply to comment #7) > I must be missing something very basic: > > # rpm -qlp CGAL-3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1 > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.FREE_USE > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.LGPL > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.QPL > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/README.Fedora > > This doesn't look like a reasonable packaging to me. > > Also: > > # rpmlint CGAL-*3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > E: CGAL devel-dependency CGAL-devel > E: CGAL no-binary > W: CGAL-devel no-dependency-on CGAL CGAL is a meta-package that requires CGAL-libs, CGAL-devel, and CGAL-sources. The reason is that the CGAL users community is used to get CGAL as a whole. > E: CGAL-devel file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/CGAL/make/makefile > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. (In reply to comment #8) > Further issues: > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > IMO, this directory name is too general. CGAL-3.2.1 ships CORE-1.7, http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core_pages/intro.html This directory is from CORE. > - Static libs: > /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a > /usr/lib/libcore++.a upstream libCGALQt is static only, as indicated in comment #1, as well as upstream libcore++. I know that static libraries should be avoided "as far as possible", in Fedora. Is the upstream devs choice a sufficient reason? > - A more general design problem: > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt > > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. Yes, it should only be /usr/include/CGAL/compiler_config.h. Is it a blocker? 20060816032618 Comment #10 From Ralf Corsepius (rc040203 at freenet.de) on 2006-08-16 03:26 EST [reply] (In reply to comment #9) > Actions(In reply to comment #7) > > I must be missing something very basic: > > > > # rpm -qlp CGAL-3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1 > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.FREE_USE > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.LGPL > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/LICENSE.QPL > > /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/README.Fedora > > > > This doesn't look like a reasonable packaging to me. > > > > Also: > > > > # rpmlint CGAL-*3.2.1-14.i386.rpm > > E: CGAL devel-dependency CGAL-devel > > E: CGAL no-binary > > W: CGAL-devel no-dependency-on CGAL > > CGAL is a meta-package that requires CGAL-libs, CGAL-devel, and CGAL-sources. Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense. Consider this to be a MUST FIX. Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into *-devel. > > E: CGAL-devel file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/CGAL/make/makefile > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX > (In reply to comment #8) > > Further issues: > > > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > > IMO, this directory name is too general. > > CGAL-3.2.1 ships CORE-1.7, http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core_pages/intro.html > This directory is from CORE. And? This doesn't answer my remark. > > - Static libs: > > /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a > > /usr/lib/libcore++.a > > upstream libCGALQt is static only, as indicated in comment #1, as well as > upstream libcore++. I know that static libraries should be avoided "as far as > possible", in Fedora. Is the upstream devs choice a sufficient reason? Formally not, but it's sufficient reason for me not to approve a package and to classify a package's quality as "low" ;) > > - A more general design problem: > > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt > > > > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. > > Yes, it should only be /usr/include/CGAL/compiler_config.h. Is it a blocker? Well, there actually are 2 issues with this. - Package dependencies. You will have to find a way to handle the hard-coded version dependencies in rpm. - Hard-coding compiler characteristics is a common design flaw many packages suffer from. This should not be much of a problem for current Fedora, but can easily become one. In many cases, such stuff disqualfies a package from inclusion in multilib'ed distros. This is an upstream problem, which probably doesn't affect current Fedora. [Wrt. endianness: Many people miss that endianness is a compiler feature. Packages hard-coding endianness break on biendian targets, e.g. for multilib'ed mips and sh distros] 20060816035855 Comment #11 From Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-08-16 03:58 EST [reply] (In reply to comment #10) > > CGAL is a meta-package that requires CGAL-libs, CGAL-devel, and CGAL-sources. > > Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense. > Consider this to be a MUST FIX. > > Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into *-devel. For the moment (CGAL-3.2.1-14), libs are in CGAL-libs, and devel files are in CGAL-devel. > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. > Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX Ok. I thought it was agreed that shell scripts in /etc/profile.d/ should not have shell bangs. If it is really a MUSTFIX, this should be written somewhere, and bugs should be reported, against all almost all package that ship something in /etc/profile.d/ > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > Further issues: > > > > > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > > > IMO, this directory name is too general. > > > > CGAL-3.2.1 ships CORE-1.7, http://www.cs.nyu.edu/exact/core_pages/intro.html > > This directory is from CORE. > And? This doesn't answer my remark. I do not see any solution, here. is the documented way to include CORE headers. If this is a blocker, CORE cannot be into Fedora. That's it. > > > - A more general design problem: > > > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > > > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt > > > > > > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. > > > > Yes, it should only be /usr/include/CGAL/compiler_config.h. Is it a blocker? > Well, there actually are 2 issues with this. > - Package dependencies. You will have to find a way to handle the hard-coded > version dependencies in rpm. Actually, these version macros are not used in CGAL. They are not even documented. They could be pruned. They are used by the CGAL test suite to display dependencies' versions. 20060816063508 Comment #12 From Patrice Dumas (pertusus at free.fr) on 2006-08-16 06:35 EST [reply] For computation package like this one I think it is much better to keep the static libraries, since the usual reasons for not having static libraries don't hold, while it is very convenient to be able to link models statically to run them on any linux. 20060816064157 Comment #13 From Patrice Dumas (pertusus at free.fr) on 2006-08-16 06:41 EST [reply] (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Actions(In reply to comment #7) > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. > Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX This is really an ignorable error. These files are sourced and not executed. Most of the files in /etc/profile.d don't have a shebang. > > > - Static libs: > > upstream libcore++. I know that static libraries should be avoided "as far as > > possible", in Fedora. Is the upstream devs choice a sufficient reason? > Formally not, but it's sufficient reason for me not to approve a package and to > classify a package's quality as "low" ;) Although it would be preferable to have dynamic libraries, it is important in my view to have static library for computational packages too, in order to be able to build statically compiled executables to be able to run on any linux. 20060816115516 Comment #14 From Ed Hill (ed at eh3.com) on 2006-08-16 11:55 EST [reply] > - Static libs: My view on static libs is somewhere between Patrice and Ralf. In situations where upstream does not provide a build mechanism for shared libs then I think it is acceptable for Fedora Extras packagers to ship static libs in -devel (that is, I don't think its necessary to force FE packagers to modify the build files to the extent needed to produce shared instead of static). And, this view is entirely consistent with the Packaging Guidelines as they are currently written. That said, we can always submit patches to the upstream folks and try to help them build and use shared libs. Helping the upstream projects is an honorable thing! :-) In any case, using the latest (-14) SRPM: + significantly cleaned up spec file (good!) + built for me in mock on FC5-i386 + has an ability to work with LEDA but, since LEDA is now proprietary, its fine that we don't try to use it (OK) - has an ability to work with TAUCS and, since TAUCS is LGPL, we should seriously consider packaging it for FE and using it as a CGAL build dependency Anyway, I'll submit a more thorough review later this week... 20060816162206 Comment #15 From Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-08-16 16:22 EST [reply] Taucs suffers the "static-only-libs" problem too. And its build/config system is really strange. Let us see if CGAL can be include in FE, then I will handle Taucs as a further step (CGAL libraries do not depend on Taucs: only the templates library, in headers, do). 20060817032959 Comment #16 From Ralf Corsepius (rc040203 at freenet.de) on 2006-08-17 03:29 EST [reply] (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > Actions(In reply to comment #7) > > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > > > > > As far as I know, these rpmlint errors should be ignored. > > Nope, these scripts are incomplete. MUSTFIX > > This is really an ignorable error. Well, agreed, it's minor error, nevertheless it's an error and easy to fix. > These files are sourced and not > executed. Then they should NOT be executable => chmod -x > Most of the files in /etc/profile.d don't have a shebang. Just because others are sloppy, doesn't mean I need to be. 20060817074840 Comment #17 From Laurent Rineau (laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org) on 2006-08-17 07:48 EST [reply] (In reply to comment #16) > > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh > > > > > E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh > > These files are sourced and not > > executed. > Then they should NOT be executable => chmod -x Agreed. It is patch in my spec file. Maybe should someone fill bugs about other packages that share that issue. I do not know how to use XML-XPC. >> TODO-latter (In reply to comment #8) > - A more general design problem: > Some headers in /usr/include/CGAL hard-code configuration-time detected > * system features, e.g. the version of zlib and Qt The CGAL_FOOBAR_VERSION macros are not used in CGAL, actually. They are here only for internal uses (to be displayed by the testsuite). I can prune that from the package. > * compiler characteristics, e.g. endianness. The endianness detection has been fixed in the upstream SVN repository yesterday, from your comment #10. It now uses macros, and no longer hard-code endianness. I will backport the patch in the src.rpm package. To summarize, the issues that remains: (In reply to comment #8) > Further issues: > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > IMO, this directory name is too general. > > - Static libs: > /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a > /usr/lib/libcore++.a These two issue last. And I do not see how to deal with that (especially the /usr/include/CORE issue, which cannot be fixed without changing CORE documentation and uses). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 14:25:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171425.k7HEPNv6001241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-17 10:15 EST ------- (Sorry for the bug spam: it seems that I have copy-pasted the whole bug history, in comment #19. Here is the comment as it should have been.) Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL-3.2.1-15.fc5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/CGAL.spec %changelog * Thu Aug 17 2006 Laurent Rineau - 3.2.1-15 - Change the permissions of /etc/profile.d/cgal.*sh - Remove the meta package CGAL. CGAL-libs is renamed CGAL. - Added two patchs: - CGAL-3.2.1-config.h-endianness_detection.patch which is an upstream patch to fix the endianness detection, so that is is no longer hard-coded in , - CGAL-3.2.1-install_cgal-no_versions_in_compiler_config.h.patch that removes hard-coded versions in . I have new errors from rpmlint: E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh E: CGAL-devel non-executable-script /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh 0644 E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh E: CGAL-devel non-executable-script /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh 0644 that comes from the new permissions of those files. And two new warnings: W: CGAL-devel non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh W: CGAL-devel non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh that could be fixed easily. To summarize, the issues that remains: (In reply to comment #8) > Further issues: > > - The *-devel package ships /usr/include/CORE > IMO, this directory name is too general. > > - Static libs: > /usr/lib/libCGALQt.a > /usr/lib/libcore++.a These two issue last. And I do not see how to deal with that (especially the /usr/include/CORE issue, which cannot be fixed without changing CORE documentation and uses). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 14:31:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202033] Review Request: deltarpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171431.k7HEVhIT001621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deltarpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 ------- Additional Comments From misa at redhat.com 2006-08-17 10:22 EST ------- Suggested changes were incorporated, please have a look (spec file path is the same). http://people.redhat.com/misa/rpms/deltarpm/deltarpm-3.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 15:20:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171520.k7HFKDJF005228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-17 11:10 EST ------- wrong URL for the srpm: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/python-sexy-0.1.8-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 16:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171600.k7HG0lr0008350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-17 11:51 EST ------- Isn't there anyone @redhat.com that can determine the original license of this module? Barring that, have we looked at RPM4 on CPAN? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 16:07:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202224] Review Request: libtirpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171607.k7HG7dY5008777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtirpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202224 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(steved at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2006-08-17 11:57 EST ------- Build task: http://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=160309 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 16:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171619.k7HGJjgT009754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-17 12:10 EST ------- e3bc24955e52a78166ff297f1a5e14ee dstat-0.6.3-5.src.rpm f833f3e0f8bb34ed50bf1388b7281cb7 dstat.spec a2df5d7fecc0115f8eef84141a068e86 dstat-0.6.3.tar.bz2 You can get rid of this line if you'd like: /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile # FC4 and FC5 run this automatically as you've noted, it gets run automatically on FC4+. If you are building for FC3, that script won't be present at all so the spec file will fail to build. All blockers have been resolved. I'm ready to ACCEPT this package, we just need to get you sponsored. As for reviewing and sponsorship. You get sponsored after you show an understanding for the guidelines. Understanding of the guidelines is all it takes to be able to do reviews. And since you're in the sponsorship process, I'll be watching over your shoulder so I can correct anything that you do wrong. (And you already know how to get into #fedora-extras on IRC which is a great resource for asking questions that might come up during the review process.) Basically, once you are sponsored, you will be able to make changes to any package in the CVS tree and be able to approve other people's packages. So having some examples showing you have the knowledge to do that well is essential. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 16:38:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202033] Review Request: deltarpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171638.k7HGc49i010903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deltarpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-17 12:28 EST ------- You don't need to specify gcc as a BR. So, If you may remove this BR you are APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 16:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171645.k7HGjVDm011399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 12:35 EST ------- The -7 package still fails for me on x86_64: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/menu/gcin* File not found: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-gcin.so File not found: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods/libqgcin.so File not found: /var/tmp/gcin-1.2.1-7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/gcin/libgcin-im-client.so Error building package from gcin-1.2.1-7.src.rpm, See build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 17:01:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171701.k7HH1onV012239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-17 12:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > The -7 package still fails for me on x86_64: Dear Jason; What does your full build log on x86_64 say? Perhaps a full build log will be useful. I cannot very this package other than on i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 17:41:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171741.k7HHf92R015745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 13:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134397) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134397&action=view) Log from failing x86_64 build of gcin-1.2.1-7 in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 18:00:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171800.k7HI0xwB017322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-08-17 13:51 EST ------- I could found compat-gcc-34-c++ on FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 18:08:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171808.k7HI8EE0017800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-17 13:58 EST ------- No, this is targeted at Rawhide and rawhide only. FC-5 needs compat-gcc-32-c++ and patch modifications... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:23:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171923.k7HJNVes024771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-17 15:13 EST ------- Neal ping on status of your employer ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:24:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171924.k7HJOlDr024956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 15:15 EST ------- 1+ month since last inquiry. I think it's same to assume submitter has gone awol, closing (WONTFIX?) Feel free to reopen, Kushal, if you're still out there, interested in this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:26:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171926.k7HJQVTw025162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-17 15:16 EST ------- Is there a justification for examples in %{_datadir}? I see that you're even copying them yourself.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:31:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171931.k7HJV645025506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-17 15:21 EST ------- "reassigned" to the new nobody id to make it clear this has not been formally taken for review yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:31:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171931.k7HJVibR025579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 15:22 EST ------- I can try reviewing this... Pierre, do you have any notions/intentions to maintain more than just this in Fedora Extras? I ask mainly because as your first reviewer, I'll need to also sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:32:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171932.k7HJWrLM025692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: optipng - a |Review Request: optipng - a |PNG optimizer and converter |PNG optimizer and converter |- need a Sponsor | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 15:23 EST ------- FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker already set, no need to be in Summary too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:33:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171933.k7HJXiOg025767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:35:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171935.k7HJZK0U025945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 15:25 EST ------- Duh, just checked all(most?) other bugs depending on this one, and they're mostly yours too. Nevermind the silly question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:37:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171937.k7HJbEGq026188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:38:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171938.k7HJc2dC026312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 15:28 EST ------- Fair enough, game on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:40:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171940.k7HJeZ12026446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:48:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202837] Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171948.k7HJmsAE026910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202837 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:49:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171949.k7HJnC9t026930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu CC|rdieter at math.unl.edu | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:53:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202837] Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171953.k7HJrFhR027280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202837 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 15:43 EST ------- Simple, clean, and best of all, it works! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:53:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171953.k7HJrMxl027319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 15:43 EST ------- Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED. One small thing, you should add %doc COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 19:57:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608171957.k7HJv3q0027617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |201502 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:01:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172001.k7HK1Nk9027889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-17 15:51 EST ------- Looking good + Built on FC5 x86_64 + Did not harm a vfat partition I tested it with + License (GPL) + spec readable + Name good + source matches upstream + macro usage + file ownership and permissions APPROVED I'll sponsor, apply for cvsextras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:10:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172010.k7HKAto7028654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:11:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172011.k7HKB912028696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(michael at knox.net.n | |z) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:14:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172014.k7HKEDro028890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 16:04 EST ------- Michal, the package looks in pretty good shape, now for some testing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:18:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172018.k7HKI4E8029223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-17 16:08 EST ------- Why have you added FE-NEEDSPONSOR block? I'm already sponsored and I'm owner of kadu and python-mutagen packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172020.k7HKKElL029300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 16:10 EST ------- MUSTFIX: lib-devel contains pkgconfig file(s), so it ought to: Requires: pkgconfig Can you explain/justify the existence of *both* a pulseaudio-devel and a pulseaudio-libs-devel pkg? I'm also inclined to say that there's needless complexity splitting out separate packages for module-alsa, lib-glib2, lib-zeroconf subpkgs. These are pretty low-level, core libraries that will (should?!) be present on any audio-capable/desktop-config machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:30:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] New: Review Request: pyxdg Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 Summary: Review Request: pyxdg Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,jpmahowald at gmail.com,notting at redhat.co m I've been asked to build alacarte into Fedora Core, it requires pyxdg, so we'll need to get pyxdg into core also. http://people.redhat.com/rstrode/pyxdg/pyxdg.spec http://people.redhat.com/rstrode/pyxdg/pyxdg-0.15-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:33:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172033.k7HKXLKp030146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-08-17 16:23 EST ------- Tech ack. Is that the extras package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:36:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] New: Review Request: alacarte Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 Summary: Review Request: alacarte Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,jpmahowald at gmail.com,notting at redhat.co m,sundaram at redhat.com I've been asked to build alacarte into Fedora Core so that we can ship a more complete gnome 2.16 release., it requires pyxdg, so I've filed bug 203019 to track getting it into Core as well. http://people.redhat.com/rstrode/alacarte/alacarte.spec http://people.redhat.com/rstrode/alacarte/alacarte-0.8-8.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:37:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172037.k7HKb2KN030520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |203022 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:37:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172037.k7HKbFUl030582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |203022 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-08-17 16:27 EST ------- yup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:37:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172037.k7HKbqL5030744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:37:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172037.k7HKbxRb030780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188267 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172038.k7HKcEKF030868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |188267 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:41:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172041.k7HKfprj031117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 16:32 EST ------- Because I'm lame and read comment #1 that said you were looking for a sponsor, and *assumed*... (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:43:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202876] Review Request: perl-Data-Alias In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172043.k7HKh5nY031197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202876 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:43:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172043.k7HKhrHq031279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-08-17 16:34 EST ------- Tech ack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202033] Review Request: deltarpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172043.k7HKhxEI031296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deltarpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 ------- Additional Comments From misa at redhat.com 2006-08-17 16:34 EST ------- Removed, in deltarpm 3.3-4 (I didn't like 3.3-3 anyway) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:46:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172046.k7HKkEu3031488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-17 16:36 EST ------- Probably want to Require: fping so that the icmpping and icmppingsec checks work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172048.k7HKmneG031642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-17 16:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Because I'm lame and read comment #1 that said you were looking for a sponsor, > and *assumed*... (: Never mind ;) So, what with approvement this package to extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172052.k7HKqfrW031935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-17 16:42 EST ------- The web interface also needs to Require: php-gd for graphs to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:53:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172053.k7HKrrvF032075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(rstrode at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-17 16:44 EST ------- Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]"), %{python_sitelib} is no longer needed. This is automagic now. Otherwise approved. Please coordinate its move from Extras to Core. Added to dist-fc6. Close when built for rawhide (and Extras is removed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 20:57:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172057.k7HKvGT8032505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO BugsThisDependsOn|188267 |188268 Flag| |needinfo?(rstrode at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-17 16:47 EST ------- Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") not needed anymore. Provides: smeg %{version}-%{release} should be Provides: smeg = %{version}-%{release} %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} isn't used anywhere, please remove it. Make those changes and approved. Please coordinate its removal from Extras. Added to dist-fc6, close this when built for rawhide and I'll add it to the default gnome Desktop. What package is this removing btw? (the old menu editor..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:00:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202853] Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172100.k7HL0ZRM000380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Alias: wfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-17 16:51 EST ------- Added a .desktop file and icon, and removed the unnecessary shell script in /usr/bin: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfut.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/wfut-1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:04:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172104.k7HL4Gut000889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-17 16:54 EST ------- looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172111.k7HLBNPD001383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 17:01 EST ------- #20 : This is probably why I'm seeing cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc/b16.pcf.gz': No such file or directory Can you fix the spec file and just upload that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172112.k7HLCUmJ001540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-08-17 17:02 EST ------- Going down my checklist again... 1. One rpmlint warning (W: crm114-emacs no-documentation), which was deemed acceptable. 2. Package appears to meet Package Naming Guidelines. 3. Spec is named crm114.spec, check. 4. Package meets Packaging Guidelines, AFAICT. 5. Licensed under GPL, check. 6. License: GPL, check. 7. %doc contains GPL-License.txt, which I missed on my first pass. 8. Spec appears to be American English. 9. Spec seems legible. 10. md5sum on tarball matches upstream now (not sure what was up with that). 11. Compiles and builds on i386/ppc (my two supported build platforms). 12. x86_64 excluded, as per dependency on tre-devel. You noted bug #202893, the blocker. Good. 13. Builds under Plague, so I imagine all of its dependencies are listed. 14. n/a, I think. 15. n/a (no shared libs) 16. n/a 17. You changed crm114-emacs' Req to emacs-el, resolving this issue. 18. No duplicate %files entries. 19. Defattr seems valid. 20. Has valid %clean section. 21. Macro use appears consistent. 22. Package contains code, not content. 23. Documentation makes up over 50% of the package's size, but that's still not that much. 24. I don't see anything in %doc affecting runtime. 25. No header files or static libraries. 26. No .pc files. 27. No library files, much less ones with suffixes. 28. n/a (no -devel subpackage) 29. No .la files. 30. No GUI applications. 31. Doesn't own any directories owned by other packages (to the best of my knowledge). 32. n/a, I overlooked GPL-License.txt 33. I'm not sure there are any description/summary translations available. 34. Package builds as i386 and ppc in Plague (and thus Mock). 35. Package won't build on x86_64 due to dependency's ExcludeArch: x86_64; other architectures, yes. 36. I can't verify full functionality, but the binary doesn't segfault on i386/ppc. 37. No scriptlets. 38. The -emacs subpackage doesn't depend on the main package, ergo no listed Req. Unless I screwed something up, it looks like crm114 is APPROVED. Go forth and import. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:19:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172119.k7HLJCwT002034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-17 17:09 EST ------- Requires: on mysql-server removed, Requires: for fping (main package) and php-gd (-web package) added. Updated files: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1.1-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:19:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172119.k7HLJgXL002110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rstrode at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-08-17 17:09 EST ------- John, can you make sure this gets dropped from extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172120.k7HLKNBL002185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rstrode at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-08-17 17:10 EST ------- John can you make this gets dropped from extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:22:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172122.k7HLMpXS002370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-08-17 17:13 EST ------- Jesse, no package is getting removed. The menu editor ships in gnome-menus, but we still need gnome-menus. (we could potentially drop the editor from the build though I guess) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:33:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172133.k7HLX4MU002883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 17:23 EST ------- Good Builds cleanly in mock and installs fine. rpmlint shows no problems Directories are correctly owned spec file is in american english no ownership conflicts Not showing up any duplicates upstream corresponds with package md5sums Same version Correct use of scriptlets Consistent use of macros Bad Should be Requires: mkfontdir %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath This is the only issue I can spot, so fix it and it should be good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:42:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172142.k7HLg777003473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 17:32 EST ------- Good Software works! rpmlint is clean on all packages and subpackages builds cleanly in mock no duplicates in the rpm consistent use of macros in the spec file spec file is in american english upstream version same as this version md5sums match no ownership problems correct use of scripts Docs okay Needs work %files %{_bindir}/* If you change this to %{_bindir}/bygfoot* then I'm happy to FE-APPROVE this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:50:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172150.k7HLoMZV003965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-17 17:40 EST ------- I forgot to mention in the notes that the main package contains some header files that rpmlint will complain about. Those are ok, shader code is compiled during runtime by the rendering engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 21:53:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172153.k7HLrdRM004198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-17 17:43 EST ------- Corrected SPEC file: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/bygfoot/bygfoot.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172201.k7HM1DmG004491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 17:51 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec Fixes the problems in #16/#17 and another issue it had. Now builds cleanly, doesn't invade neighbouring countries and destroys 99% of all known cults dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:11:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172211.k7HMBIM4005004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 18:01 EST ------- What is pkgconfig in there for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:12:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203039] New: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt/perl-Sys-Virt.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1-2.src.rpm Description: The Sys::Virt module provides a Perl XS binding to the libvirt virtual machine management APIs. This allows machines running within arbitrary virtualization containers to be managed with a consistent API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172214.k7HMExkJ005153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-17 18:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > What is pkgconfig in there for? I don't know, but it is needed for fine mock build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:21:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172221.k7HMLgYQ005507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 18:12 EST ------- Wierd! I've checked in mock and you're right. APPROVED Don't forget to close the bug and set it as NEXT-RELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172222.k7HMMh5u005632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-17 18:13 EST ------- Per Toshio's review; here is the new spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine-0.7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:42:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172242.k7HMg0C7006781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 18:32 EST ------- Where would be a better place that in %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/examples? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172242.k7HMgRZ3006808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 22:50:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172250.k7HMoc6f007221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-17 18:41 EST ------- Good Software works (tested against Ortep) Consistent use of macros Includes documentation No static libs/.la files No dupes from the rpms spec file in american english rpmlint clean mock builds fine Includes devel file, no .pc file, so no pkgconfig required for devel Correct use of scriptlets Dist tag fine Doesn't leave a mess when deinstalling I'm happy with this. APPROVED Please remember to close the bug and change the tab to NEXT-RELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 23:03:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202004] Review Request: brandy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172303.k7HN36FL007893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brandy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202004 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-17 18:53 EST ------- Why not:: %doc examples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 17 23:18:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608172318.k7HNIPUM008841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-17 19:08 EST ------- Imported and built for devel. FC5 branch requested. Should I try and convince FESCo to allow FC4 branch? tre managed to get in... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 00:00:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180000.k7I00oBr010264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 00:23:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180023.k7I0N4Y2011053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-17 20:13 EST ------- So bad, too many problems about x86_64. The upstream author and I only have i386 machine, so we can not test and debug it on x86_64. Anyway, I will see the mock build log first then try to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 00:48:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202876] Review Request: perl-Data-Alias In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180048.k7I0mTY8011977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202876 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 20:38 EST ------- You should be careful with that method of requires filtering, because there's no guarantee that __perl_provides will always be /usr/lib/rpm/perl.prov. The safest method is detailed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl. That said, many modules do use it and it is relatively simple. Other than that there's not much to say. * source files match upstream: 390fc2fefbf3fa9bf30d482a46989953 Data-Alias-1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: Alias.so()(64bit) perl(Data::Alias) = 1.0 perl-Data-Alias = 1.0-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Data::Alias) = 1.0 perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=26, Tests=561, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.78 cusr + 0.25 csys = 1.03 CPU) The skipped test checks for the //= operator and won't run otherwise; I think that's a Perl6 thing. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 00:49:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180049.k7I0nNtZ012061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 20:39 EST ------- Just an experiment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 00:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180050.k7I0ovUM012179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 00:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202905] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180051.k7I0px1T012279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202905 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:21:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180121.k7I1LUvw013336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-17 21:11 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-4.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23-4.fc6.src.rpm * Thu Aug 17 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.23-4 - Instead of manually copying all of the plugins, pack them into a tarball and include a script for generating the tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:22:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180122.k7I1M3oi013379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-17 21:12 EST ------- Again, the new file: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-2.src.rpm i386 mock builds cleanly Hope the x86_64 problems will be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:32:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180132.k7I1WL1O013885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-17 21:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > Requires: mkfontdir %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath You refer to Requires(post)? Well, I changed Requires(post) to %{_bindir}/mkfontdir, %{_sbindir}/chkfontpath, fontconfig (fontconfig is for fc-cache) and the fixed spec file is http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec (0.4.2-6). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:32:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180132.k7I1WNmm013891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-17 21:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/rt2500-kmod.spec SRPMS URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/5/SRPMS/rt2500-kmod-1.1.0.cvs2006081716-4.2.6.17_1.2174_FC5.src.rpm Description: Kernel module for RT2500 wireless devices Ok i've made a new update conforming to naming rules... rpmlint -i kmod-rt2500-* (only one kind of warning) W: kmod-rt2500 summary-not-capitalized rt2500 kernel module(s) Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. kmodtool reason %{name} kernel module(s) W: kmod-rt2500 unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2174_FC5/extra/rt2500/rt2500.ko What does it mean? W: kmod-rt2500 no-documentation rt2500-kmod-common provides documentation... W: kmod-rt2500-kdump filename-too-long-for-joliet kmod-rt2500-kdump-1.1.0.cvs2006081716-4.2.6.17_1.2174_FC5.i686.rpm This filename is too long to fit on a joliet filesystem (limit is 64 unicode chars). Can i solve it? src.rpm W: rt2500-kmod mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. May i fix? tool for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:37:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180137.k7I1bPJ4014179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-17 21:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > #20 : > cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc/b16.pcf.gz': No such file or > directory Yes, this is because I changed the directory in efont-unicode-bdf, is it okay? The spec of jfbterm with efont-unicode-bdf > 0.4.2-5 is: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jfbterm.spec (0.4.7-4) This should fix the error on the comment #20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180140.k7I1eT1W014329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 21:30 EST ------- Interesting, so you can get a package back to the "NEW" state by closing and then reopening it. Russell, lately I've been sponsoring various Red Hat folks on the basis of a single package as long as they're responsive, which it looks like you've been. Unfortunately, I don't really have the means to test this properly. If there's someone who is willing to chip in with the testing, I'm willing to sponsor and do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:42:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180142.k7I1g1sN014398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-17 21:32 EST ------- I'll volunteer to test. Every box of mine is XFS :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:44:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180144.k7I1i5vX014495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-08-17 21:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/rt2500.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/5/SRPMS/rt2500-1.1.0.cvs2006081716-4_FC5.src.rpm Description: Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices rpmlint -1 success... (i686, debug, src) There is still a problem with RaConfig2500 for asking root password with pam... ( Any info about this ? ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 01:45:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202876] Review Request: perl-Data-Alias In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180145.k7I1jnDu014564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202876 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-17 21:36 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 02:05:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180205.k7I25IlN015635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-17 21:55 EST ------- I use mock to build i386 and x86_64 and ppc version for FC5, and all those builds are cleanly. Also, I use mock to build it for FC4, and the builds are cleanly, too. But I use my i386 machine to build all those, so I don't know will it builds cleanly on x86_64 machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 02:19:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180219.k7I2J4sL016380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 22:09 EST ------- That is significantly shorter. I was just hoping that some specfile wizard knew of a way to loop over those %{S:n} entries. In any case, it does look like you addressed the %doc issue even though you didn't mention it. The spaces-tabs thing is still there; Source1, 2, and 3 are all tab-indented while none of the other lines are. Not that this is a huge deal, but I have to mention it. What about the problems I had in testing? It would be nice to know they're expected, if there are missing dependencies or if something went wrong in the build. And do you have any idea where the _sanity.sh unit tests promised by the HACKING file are? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 03:07:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202905] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180307.k7I37A5G019200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202905 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 22:57 EST ------- Man, I have to say I really wish the Perl people would take their licensing a bit more seriously. This package says it's released under the same terms as POE. POE says it's released under the same terms as Perl. Love the double indirection. Thanks for the great comment about the POE::API::Peek requirement. The remaining tests seem to run fine in mock and I'd expect them to be OK in the buildsys. * source files match upstream: d20963ebc65bebea4c863813861b9985 POE-Component-Server-HTTP-0.09.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP) = 0.09 perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Connection) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Response) perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP = 0.09-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(HTTP::Request) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Connection) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Response) perl(POE::Component::Server::TCP) perl(Socket) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=26, 11 wallclock secs ( 0.45 cusr + 0.13 csys = 0.58 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 03:25:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202908] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180325.k7I3PSu2020095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202908 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 03:41:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180341.k7I3fUsJ021006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 23:31 EST ------- Has someone actually talked to the maintainer of alacarte in Extras? He was asking on #fedora-devel Tuesday whether or not someone would at least talk to him about it, given that the release notes indicate that the package is supposed to go into FC6. I know everyone is busy but it would be really nice if there was a bit more communication with the Extras maintainers when packages go to Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 03:42:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180342.k7I3gFmS021080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 23:32 EST ------- BTW, > releases alacarte Found package alacarte in owners.list: Distro: Fedora Extras Desc: Simple menu editor for GNOME Owner: jpmahowald at gmail.com CC: foolish at guezz.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 03:49:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203039] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180349.k7I3nKpu021510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 03:55:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180355.k7I3tOOA021894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-08-17 23:45 EST ------- Jason, John is on the CC list for this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 04:20:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202905] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180420.k7I4KLc1023454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202905 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 00:10 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 04:20:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202908] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180420.k7I4KMFc023467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202908 Bug 202908 depends on bug 202905, which changed state. Bug 202905 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202905 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 04:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203039] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180423.k7I4NSWL023671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 00:13 EST ------- The full test suite requires perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::Pod) to run; these should be buildrequires'ed. Add these two and I'll approve. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + source files match upstream: 63b776d65213df313685fc93b808b3bf Sys-Virt-0.1.1.tar.gz 63b776d65213df313685fc93b808b3bf Sys-Virt-0.1.1.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (5/x86_64). + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1-2.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Virt.so()(64bit) perl(Sys::Virt) = 0.1.1 perl(Sys::Virt::Domain) perl(Sys::Virt::Error) perl-Sys-Virt = 0.1.1-2.fc5 == requires libvirt.so.0()(64bit) libxenstore.so()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Sys::Virt::Domain) perl(Sys::Virt::Error) perl(XSLoader) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) ** perl-Sys-Virt-debuginfo-0.1.1-2.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Virt.so.debug()(64bit) perl-Sys-Virt-debuginfo = 0.1.1-2.fc5 == requires + no shared libraries in the system paths are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. X %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=7, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.28 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.34 CPU) + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 04:31:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180431.k7I4VpmP023936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 00:22 EST ------- 1.2.2-2 does indeed build on x86_64 and rpmlint is quiet to boot. Note that I haven't signed on to review this package, but since I have the build logs in front of me I'll check a few things. You don't use the %{?dist} tag. It's not required but it does make maintenance across multiple releases much easier and you should probably use it unless you know that you don't want to. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag for more information. You must include the COPYING file in %doc. You should also consider including ChangeLog, and putting README in the main package instead of the -devel subpackage if it includes any end-user documentation. (I am not capable of reading it so I can't tell. The configure script isn't a regular configure script, so I'm not sure it's productive to call it with the %configure macro, which will call configure with many flags that it doesn't seem to understand. It looks like the Makefile ignores CFLAGS, so the compiler is not called with the proper set of flags. I think you will need to patch the makefile, or perhaps the generated config.mak. I added the following hack to the end of %prep: perl -pi -e "s/^(OPTFLAGS.*=)/\1 %{optflags} /" config.mak and it does get the right flags passed to the compiler, but it also causes the build to fail on my 8CPU machine unless I disable parallel make. I have no idea why. I have a suspicion it has something to do with the "-pipe" option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 05:24:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180524.k7I5OXrY025255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-18 01:14 EST ------- I add the COPYING and Changlog to %dco and remove README from -devel subpackage. I also remove the configure script. (It is no use) I add "perl -pi -e "s/^(OPTFLAGS.*=)/\1 %{optflags} /" config.mak" after %configure, then I build fail on my SMP machine, too. I disable parallel make then it build success. Now, I am reading the DistTag Document, and I will try to use the %{?dist} tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 05:33:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180533.k7I5Xr6F025496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 01:24 EST ------- Oops. Every village needs its idiot, I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 05:46:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180546.k7I5k6o9025908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-18 01:36 EST ------- It looks like the unit tests are only in SVN: http://svn.sacredchao.net/svn/quodlibet/trunk/quodlibet/_sanity.sh http://svn.sacredchao.net/svn/quodlibet/trunk/quodlibet/tests/ I chatted with the developer on IRC and he said that the tests use PyGTK which needs X so that's a non-starter for a rpm build. He also said that the tests use a number of other libraries that may or may not be in Fedora. See: http://www.sacredchao.net/quodlibet/changeset/3795 (In reply to comment #7) > Also, what's the upstream for google.py? From the looks of things, it's you, > which would be OK. Yup, it's me. > It seems to me that there must be a simpler way to copy 50 sources into place. > > The README file says there are unit tests included, but I don't see them in the > package. > > I built this for i386 and installed it on my home machine; it seems to run OK > but I saw this odd bit on startup: > > Introspect error: The name org.gajim.dbus was not provided by any .service files Probably because you don't have gajim installed. One of the plugins is for > I found errors with four plugins: > > ImportError: No module named musicbrainz Expected... libmusicbrainz is in Core, but the python-ctypes package needed for the libmusicbrainz python bindings are in Extras. There is now a python-musicbrainz2 package in extras but the API is completely different from the original bindings. > ImportError: No module named CDDB > ImportError: No module named lastfm Neither of these modules are available in Fedora at the moment. My reasoning for including these plugins anyway is that Quod Libet handles errors like this cleanly, and if the user was to obtain these modules some other way (say by manually installing from the source) the plugins would work for them. > ImportError: No module named path > > I guess the first three are optional requirements, which should be OK. The last > one is odd; here's the full backtrace: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/quodlibet/plugins/songsmenu/shell.2.py", line 11, in ? > import os > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/os.py", line 133, in ? > from os.path import (curdir, pardir, sep, pathsep, defpath, extsep, altsep, > ImportError: No module named path > > In addition, I chose View->File System and got this backtrace: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/quodlibet/qltk/quodlibet.py", line 518, in select_browser > self.browser = Browser(library, player) > File "/usr/share/quodlibet/browsers/filesystem.py", line 67, in __init__ > dt = DirectoryTree(initial=const.HOME, folders=folders) > File "/usr/share/quodlibet/qltk/filesel.py", line 68, in __init__ > folders = filter(is_folder, folders) > UnboundLocalError: local variable 'is_folder' referenced before assignment The developer feels that these tracebacks may indicate some local problem with the Pythin library. I was unable to duplicate the problem on by screen > I exited the program which left the default view that way and now neither > quodlibet nor exfalso will start. You should be able to get the view back to the default by editing ~/.quodlibet/config and changing "browser = FileSystem" to "browser = SearchBar". > For some reason I don't get any desktop menu entry, even though the desktop file > looks OK to me. (I use KDE.) > > Review: > * All 9000 source files match upstream: > 195c39433b4e2a5bf930af7570b61f3e quodlibet-0.23.tar.gz > > 0b7d2ff31c4c113b52b74e1b8c867843 albumart.py > 2385a15ea0f8c4ccbcf347eb9e5ef174 _amazon.py > b5f85eb37b75acba938d082913d31b32 animosd.py > 17421585b258ac44a0c04a50f06b25da ape2id3.py > 680c7f7df3ac0cd949daa153c419e451 automask.py > f3d86669ab18d4c25075212943cd74e1 autorating.py > 9a984fb37453ff86ac861b01b31f6594 bookmarks.py > 3865f4f3ece8d667c20fe3b8d34418dd brainz.py > ab800ac4b48a0a228f1504914f198b5a browsefolders.py > ae0be895b7441c9d38b0d8725f53f46c cddb.py > 73c4409dfbdc8a9d8b7cd1a04f86ac23 clock.py > c898ef2d38ad04b64137f0b6a8845852 fixlatin1tags.py > 0fb2b513d89026c809b77c423c5080f8 gajim_status.py > ae32b874d01fb16bed24626602ed2a98 html.py > 4b71dfdbed6d5e8248028f62a3290888 iconv.py > cd8f349983822b0429ef36d51c506992 ifp.py > 4fd524e514cb0da6714628c7c1078242 importexport.py > 57c82a80c4f30f6ac9b87801e7c80728 iradiolog.py > d73546846d3280d0d3b2548a97bd8991 jep118.py > 692f212693a86de9858e4979d6cec1b6 k3b.py > 437ab5e65b7788641880b1ff7f4ae9f4 kakasi.py > 57cf89358975fc75267bbff6d629749f lastfmsubmit.py > c235836bb4b3f0480f674b6d21996407 nautilus.py > 2a140f01260cb7dc5fc89f95fe11b4e0 notify.py > d9868612bc1a13536f37d321bd4748d2 qlscrobbler.py > 77dd97961b563ce6a0e0e596d98c39fe randomalbum.py > f179c4db522561eed1629854b8de3a4d replaygain.py > cb8f5b018503b2f0ad44fc10fc0bd3be reset.py > dbd51ebd76b5a8e0a23558480c79da7b resub.py > e5fc6a506f63de6f9661d2ded274d70d splitting.py > 09c6da4082b6aa33d998991be7c508a8 _subprocobj.py > 18ba6a789e95d5d202d911d826d94747 titlecase.py > 12a36f1cc82b14cb25ba54b3d84503c8 trayicon.py > 87065bf6d3b2084ca1a1c1f06f2b3f6c wikipedia.py > 705e734f3d755a1e05854bc68ed90f6a write_cover.py > > Source58, pulled manually according to the comments, also matches: > 5a9d7e599fab9be828a6244ee12e3542 shell.2.py?format=raw > > No upstream for google.py > > * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is correct. > * license field matches the actual license. > X license is open source-compatible. License text upstream but not included in > package. > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). > * debuginfo package looks complete. > X rpmlint is silent (just one tab) > * final provides and requires are sane: > _mmkeys.so()(64bit) > quodlibet = 0.23-3.fc6 > = > /usr/bin/env > gnome-python2-libegg > gstreamer-python >= 0.10 > libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) > libcairo.so.2()(64bit) > libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) > libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) > pygtk2 >= 2.8 > python >= 2.4 > python-mutagen >= 1.5 > vorbisgain > ? %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual testing reveals a few > problems; see above. > * shared libraries are present, but they aren't in the ld search path. > * package is not relocatable. > * owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no scriptlets present. > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * no headers. > * no pkgconfig files. > * no libtool .la droppings. > * desktop file looks correct and is installed properly. (Note that I don't get > a desktop menu entry, but I don't see anything wrong with the desktop file.) > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 05:57:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180557.k7I5vio8026120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |toshio at tiki-lounge.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-18 01:48 EST ------- MD5Sums 249021f97fc8f90836205db8d5c2cd5a pgfouine-0.7-3.src.rpm c6b09d495fd11e0b8e9b4b86e4252449 pgfouine-0.7-include_path.patch 536a23564b21eb28d98485a3746b90a5 pgfouine-0.7.tar.gz 13783dd119055e07a1f4bb5822b5e768 pgfouine.spec Blockers: * Source does not match upstream tarball. It looks like upstream has taken some changes from you and you have repackaged the 0.7 release with these changes included. This is not okay. Instead you can either: 1) Use the vanilla 0.7 tarball with any necessary patches applied afterwards. 2) Use a snapshot from upstream's SCM and in a comment show how to recreate the snapshot package. Since a diff of the files doesn't show any changes that will affect building or what is installed on the system, I would suggest using upstream's 0.7 tarball in this case. * Macros are used everywhere except in the patch file. So if %{_datadir} is ever redefined, the include_path will still be set to /usr/share/.... I would suggest using a patch file that does something like: + ini_set('include_path', '@INCLUDEPATH@'); + And then in the spec using: sed -i 's!@INCLUDEPATH@!%{_datadir}!' pgfouine_vacuum.php sed -i 's!@INCLUDEPATH@!%{_datadir}!' pgfouine.php If the upstream package had a build script it would do something like that to allow the paths to be redefined. * INSTALL is not needed in the package as it doesn't give any information that would be relevant to someone who installed via the rpm. ChangeLog could go in but that depends on how useful you think it will be to users of the package. * Why are the tests installed into %{_datadir}/pgfouine? Are they necessary for the package to run? If not, they should be installed to %doc (if they are useful for the user to know how to run the programs) or left out. Cosmetic: * There's no need to check that the buildroot is not "/" before rm'ing it because you are already setting the buildroot in the spec file. So: [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && rm -rf %{buildroot} can be reduced to: rm -rf %{buildroot} * I favor more verbose Changelog entries. Since the previous reviewing occurred on IRC rather than bugzilla, it would be especially nice (When in bugzilla, you can reference the bugzilla number; when on IRC, things can get lost.) Good and Already Fixed: * Name conforms to the naming guidelines. * Spec file name matches the package name. * Package is licensed under the GPL and this is reflected in the license tag. * License is included as the COPYING file. * Spec file is written in English and is legible. * Builds to noarch on x86_64. * No language files, no need for %find_lang. * No shared libraries. * Not relocatable. * Owns all directories that are created. * No duplicate files listed in %files. * permissions are set correctly on files. * %clean section that removes the buildroot is present. * Code not content. * Nothing in %doc affects the program's operation. * Not a library package so no headers, static or dynamic libs, pkgconfig files, or .la files. * Not a GUI application so no .desktop needed. * Does not own files or directories owned by another package. * No scriptlets included or needed. * No subpackages * Removed AutoReq: no and Requires: php. This change let rpm's dependency resolver pick up the dependence on /usr/bin/php on its own. * Changed patch to remove the "." path from being included in the scripts. This was a security hole. (Invoke the script from a world writable directory and someone could inject a trojan php file into the script.) * Packager, Vendor, Copyright, and PreReq tags are not used as per Packaging/Guidelines. * BuildRoot in prefered form. * Builds in mock. * No necessary or optional buildrequires were left out. * rpmlint returns no issues for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 06:04:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180604.k7I64Pkc026300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-18 01:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED. > Thanks, imported and build, closing. > One small thing, you should add > %doc COPYING Woops, I forgot todo this, I've made the change in CVS now, a new version will be forthcoming shortly since there are some annoyances I wan't to fix (which require diving into the source first) such as -f to start fullscreen not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 06:13:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202837] Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180613.k7I6D4Ic026539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fRaBs - Free data files for abuse the game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202837 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-18 02:03 EST ------- Thanks, Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 06:22:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180622.k7I6MWlQ026751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-18 02:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > MUSTFIX: lib-devel contains pkgconfig file(s), so it ought to: > Requires: pkgconfig Hmm... is this to get the correct directory structure? Because a owner of .pc files has no need for the pkgconfig command (the users of the .pc files are the ones that need the command). > > Can you explain/justify the existence of *both* a pulseaudio-devel and a > pulseaudio-libs-devel pkg? > Of course. :) pulseaudio-devel is the headers and libraries for building modules for the server. pulseaudio-libs-devel is the headers and libraries for building PulseAudio clients. > I'm also inclined to say that there's needless complexity splitting out separate > packages for module-alsa, lib-glib2, lib-zeroconf subpkgs. These are pretty > low-level, core libraries that will (should?!) be present on any > audio-capable/desktop-config machine. I couldn't find any reasonable list of libraries that are "always present", so I went with the approach of least dependencies. Note though that a machine running pulseaudio server/clients isn't necesariliy a desktop machine. You could have a machine hooked up to output sound on your living room stereo, or you could have a dedicated mp3 player (HTPC perhaps) that you want to stream data somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 06:52:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180652.k7I6qmXd027606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method server for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 candyz0416 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc5 |devel ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-18 02:43 EST ------- Add COPYING Changelog to %doc Use Dist Tag The New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-3.src.rpm The mock build cleanly on my machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 07:42:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180742.k7I7gj88029894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-18 03:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > What is pkgconfig in there for? > > I don't know, but it is needed for fine mock build. I'm unable to reproduce an issue with this. I removed the buildreq of pkgconfig and it still got pulled in properly as a dependency of other buildrequired packages when running mock builds on FC5.x86_64 and FC6.i386. Where is the failure happening when you guys tried this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 07:57:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180757.k7I7vZ1I030720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-18 03:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #39) > > MUSTFIX: lib-devel contains pkgconfig file(s), so it ought to: > > Requires: pkgconfig > > Hmm... is this to get the correct directory structure? Because a owner of .pc > files has no need for the pkgconfig command (the users of the .pc files are the > ones that need the command). A .pc file is useless without pkgconfig, hence packages providing .pc files should require pkgconfig. And even if you don't buy that argument, the directory that the .pc file is installed into is owned by the pkgconfig package, which is another reason why it must be required. Moreover, libpulse-mainloop-glib.pc in the pulseaudio-lib-devel package contains: Requires: libpulse glib-2.0 glib-2.0.pc is provided by glib2-devel so pulseaudio-lib-devel should have a dependency on glib2-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 09:40:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180940.k7I9ecME007588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-18 05:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm unable to reproduce an issue with this. I removed the buildreq of pkgconfig > and it still got pulled in properly as a dependency of other buildrequired > packages when running mock builds on FC5.x86_64 and FC6.i386. > > Where is the failure happening when you guys tried this? I realized why you're unable to reproduce that issue. I notice that pkgconfig is installed as a dependency for gtk2-devel, gettext or desktop-file-utils. This is mock build report: ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: desktop-file-utils x86_64 0.10-6.1 core 62 k gettext x86_64 0.14.5-3 core 1.4 M gtk2-devel x86_64 2.8.15-1 core 2.7 M Installing for dependencies: atk x86_64 1.11.3-1 core 209 k atk-devel x86_64 1.11.3-1 core 104 k ....... ....... pkgconfig x86_64 1:0.20-2.2.1 core 61 k So probably we can delete pkgconfig BR. I can do it in next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 09:49:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608180949.k7I9niGH008509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-18 05:40 EST ------- I think it may be down to my i386 buildsys, but it gtk2-devel wasn't dragging in pkgconfig. I'll need to check at home in case there is a conflict somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 10:36:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181036.k7IAabtK011190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-18 06:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I think it may be down to my i386 buildsys, but it gtk2-devel wasn't dragging in > pkgconfig. > > I'll need to check at home in case there is a conflict somewhere. There's something wrong there because gtk2-devel requires glib2-devel, which in turn requires pkgconfig >= 1:0.8 The pkgconfig in FC5 is 1:0.20, which should be pulled in by this dependency. The same dependency chain is there in rawhide too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 11:49:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201842] Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181149.k7IBnomg015190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotutils - GNU plotutils graphics libs and utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201842 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-18 07:40 EST ------- Paul, thanks for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 13:00:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181300.k7ID0ALQ019164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-08-18 08:50 EST ------- I replaced the specfile with a new version that will not have multilib conflicts. However, its part of a large package update i'm working on, so it won't build with whats in FC6 now, so I didn't upgrade the SRPMS. However, its basically just the old version with a patch added and prefix/lib changed to libdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 13:40:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181340.k7IDeDAX021509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-18 09:30 EST ------- The devel package needs a Requires: pkgconfig since it contains a .pc file AND puts it in the pkgconfig owned directory. Other than that I think this is passible. Approving so you can build the stack, the whole mono stack is in flux and I understand that. As we fix it more we should revisit the guidelines to make sure they are kept in line with reality. Please close when you've built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 15:03:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181503.k7IF3iSm029466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-18 10:53 EST ------- Thanks for Paul's helpful analysis, (in addition to MUSTFIX item from comment #39): 2. MUSTFIX, pulseaudio-lib-devel needs: Requires: glib2-devel Since you're upstream dev, it may be worth perusing pulseaudio's headers to see if dependancies on other pkgs exist as well (I'm betting not, but you never know). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 15:10:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202908] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181510.k7IFAETd030557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202908 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 11:00 EST ------- You might want to take out that commented "BR: perl(" line, but other than that it's another clean cpanspec-generated package. * source files match upstream: 263fd98df07331d64be5beb75b07835a POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC-0.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Server::XMLRPC) = 0.05 perl(XMLRPCTransaction) perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC = 0.05-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP) perl(XMLRPC::Lite) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and the single test passes: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.17 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 15:11:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181511.k7IFBvno030894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-18 11:02 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. I'm playing with a few things to see if I can move the perl bits from %{perl_vendorarch} to %{_libdir}. I'll have an update later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 15:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181516.k7IFG2k6031604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-08-18 11:06 EST ------- Note the xfs-cmds cvs tree on oss.sgi.com contains the xfstest scripts, many of which run xfsdump/restore regression tests. This scripts are run nightly by Nathan Scott at SGI but only on x86 and ia64 machines. If anybody has other architectures available to test it would to good to have those results as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 15:18:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202910] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181518.k7IFIvFF032093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202910 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 16:01:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202910] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181601.k7IG1Tld007002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202910 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 11:51 EST ------- This package looks fine, but I'm unsure about the long comment list of Requires: bits. It looks like those are all either found automatically by RPM or pulled in by the perl-POE dep so everything should be OK. * source files match upstream: dec01e04284b5acda6d706018b1f499c POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-1.11.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP) = 1.11 perl(POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP::Connection) = 1.05 perl(POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP::PreFork) = 0.01 perl(POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP::Response) = 1.03 perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP = 1.11-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(IPC::Shareable) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::SSLify) perl(POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP::Connection) perl(POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP::Response) perl(POE::Driver::SysRW) perl(POE::Filter::HTTPD) perl(POE::Wheel::ReadWrite) perl(POE::Wheel::SocketFactory) perl(Socket) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=4, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.12 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.17 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 16:03:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202913] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181603.k7IG35WP007406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202913 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 16:14:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202908] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181614.k7IGEYeb008817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC - Publish POE event handlers via XMLRPC over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202908 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 12:05 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 16:47:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181647.k7IGlVr9013431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-18 12:37 EST ------- Build still fails with error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/fmio-wrapper.pyc /usr/bin/fmio-wrapper.pyo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 17:04:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181704.k7IH4bZK015644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-18 12:54 EST ------- Build failed. devel x86_64. Traceback (most recent call last): File "configure.py", line 1132, in ? main(sys.argv) File "configure.py", line 1099, in main pyqt.check_modules() File "configure.py", line 124, in check_modules check_module("QtGui", "qwidget.h", "QWidget()") File "configure.py", line 403, in check_module if check_class(incfile, ctor, mname): File "configure.py", line 430, in check_class return compile_qt_program(cfgtest, mname) File "configure.py", line 359, in compile_qt_program exe, build = makefile.build_command(name) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/sipconfig.py", line 1622, in build_command build.append(self.required_string("CXX")) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/sipconfig.py", line 781, in required_string raise ValueError, "\"%s\" must have a non-empty value" % name ValueError: "CXX" must have a non-empty value -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 17:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202910] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181723.k7IHNb40018110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202910 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 13:14 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 17:23:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202913] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181723.k7IHNpmF018156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202913 Bug 202913 depends on bug 202910, which changed state. Bug 202910 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP - Serve HTTP requests in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202910 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 17:35:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202913] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181735.k7IHZZD5019609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202913 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 13:25 EST ------- cpanspec makes reviewing new package requests a breeze in Extras.... * source files match upstream: dcda3222ea8cf981c2aace003aa33733 POE-Component-Server-SOAP-1.09.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Server::SOAP) = 1.09 perl(POE::Component::Server::SOAP::Response) = 1.02 perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP = 1.09-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Server::SOAP::Response) perl(POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP) perl(SOAP::Lite) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.18 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 17:36:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181736.k7IHaIfj019710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-18 13:26 EST ------- Offhand, I'd say looks like a bug in sip. It's not returning a value for CXX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 17:39:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181739.k7IHdfRk020331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-18 13:30 EST ------- On my rhel4 box, with latest sip /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/sipconfig.py contains 'CXX': 'g++' What does your sipconfig contain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 17:45:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181745.k7IHjsft021221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 13:36 EST ------- > It looks like the unit tests are only in SVN: No problem. > I chatted with the developer on IRC and he said that the tests use PyGTK which > needs X so that's a non-starter for a rpm build. OK, that's fine. It's just that I always want to see available test suites run if it's possible to do so. > Probably because you don't have gajim installed. One of the plugins is for OK, I can accept that some of the included plugins don't run if optional modules aren't installed. Since we have no other way to specify optional modules, can you create a README.fedora file or somesuch with information about which optional modules can be installed to give more functionality? Either that or split out the plugins with extra dependencies into separate packages that have those dependencies. > Expected... libmusicbrainz is in Core, but the python-ctypes package needed for > the libmusicbrainz python bindings are in Extras. So I just need to install python-ctypes? Or is the issue that the python bindings aren't built in the core package because a requisite module is not in core? Is it possible to get this plugin working at all with the current state of the libmusicbrainz packages? If not, there's probably not much point in shipping the plugin. > Neither of these modules are available in Fedora at the moment. My reasoning > for including these plugins anyway is that Quod Libet handles errors like this > cleanly, and if the user was to obtain these modules some other way (say by > manually installing from the source) the plugins would work for them. I can buy that; hopefully the libraries will make it in at some point. > The developer feels that these tracebacks may indicate some local problem with > the Pythin library. I was unable to duplicate the problem on by screen I have a plain extremely stock FC5 system. It would be nice to get another tester to see if anyone else can duplicate this. I'll try it on a freshly installed machine at work, but the remote display will be sloooow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 18:09:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203039] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181809.k7II91Vv024531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-08-18 13:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The full test suite requires perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and > perl(Test::Pod) to run; these should be buildrequires'ed. Oops. I tested a mock build, but I forgot to look at build.log. -3 has those added. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 18:32:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181832.k7IIWnTO027530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(michael at knox.net.n | |z) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 18:33:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181833.k7IIXULt027689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(chris.stone at gmail. | |com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 18:34:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203039] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181834.k7IIYSBD027874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 14:24 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 18:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181840.k7IIewwc029025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 19:00:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181900.k7IJ0UrP032384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(chrisw at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 14:50 EST ------- Closing and blocking FE-DEADREVIEW. The original submitter should feel free to reopen if he wants to continue this submission later. If someone else wants to submit this module, open a new ticket and mark this as a duplicate of the new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 19:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608181924.k7IJOC2g003684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 19:53:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203180] New: Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203180 Summary: Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/hnb.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/hnb-1.9.18-1.src.rpm Description: Hierarchical notebook(hnb) is a curses program to structure many kinds of data in one place, for example addresses, to-do lists, ideas, book reviews or to store snippets of brainstorming. Writing structured documents and speech outlines. The default format is XML but hnb can also export to ASCII and HTML. External programs may be used for more advanced conversions of the XML data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:03:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203180] Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182003.k7IK3RKN008713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203180 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jima at beer.tclug.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:07:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182007.k7IK7kCd009321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 15:58 EST ------- Note that FC5 and later will compile every single .py file in existence (which is a bug) and it will do that at the very end of the rpmbuild run so that you can't delete the extraneous files. So you need to have this in %files: %exclude %{_bindir}/fmio-wrapper.py[co] If you want to target FC4 and earlier or you want to continue to build if this bug gets fixed, you'll also need to do this in %install: touch %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/fmio-wrapper.pyc touch %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/fmio-wrapper.pyo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:28:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] New: Review Request: netlabel_tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: james.antill at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools-0.16-2.src.rpm Description: NetLabel is a kernel subsystem which implements explicit packet labeling protocols such as CIPSO and RIPSO for Linux. Packet labeling is used in secure networks to mark packets with the security attributes of the data they contain. This package provides the necessary user space tools to query and configure the kernel subsystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:34:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182034.k7IKYeir012291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 16:25 EST ------- I'll review this, but I'm not sure I can test it as I'm not a gnome user (partially because of gconf itself). Unfortunately, the build fails for me: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'OPTIMIZE=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' *** can not find package gconf-2.0 >= 2.0.0 *** check that it is properly installed and available in PKG_CONFIG_PATH at Makefile.PL line 44 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14178 (%build) Looks like a missing BR: GConfig2-devel. I replaced the unnecessary BR: perl with that (^_^) and now it builds. The usual rpmlint warnings for arch-specific Perl packages: W: perl-Gnome2-GConf devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/GConf/Install/gconfperl-autogen.h W: perl-Gnome2-GConf devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/GConf/Install/gconfperl-version.h W: perl-Gnome2-GConf devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/GConf/Install/gconfperl.h All of which are OK. I'm going to assume for the purposes of this review that the missing BR: GConf2-devel is there. Hmm, it looks like rpmbuild has trouble generating a proper debuginfo package. I added this to the end of %build and it does better: cp xs/* . I don't know what's up with the seven skipped subtests. Any idea? Review: * source files match upstream: 887b979e04df4adbfd616729cda0f37b Gnome2-GConf-1.032.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (after adding GConf2-devel.) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignorable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: GConf.so()(64bit) perl(Gnome2::GConf) perl(Gnome2::GConf::Client) perl(Gnome2::GConf::Install::Files) perl(Gnome2::GConf::Value) perl-Gnome2-GConf = 1.032-1.fc6 = libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Glib) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: t/00.GConf....ok 7/11 skipped: basic-gconf-app directory not found in GConf. All tests successful, 7 subtests skipped. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers (other than those internal to Perl). * no pkgconfig files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:38:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182038.k7IKcUcQ012862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(robert at marcanoonli | |ne.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203180] Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182041.k7IKfriL013080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203180 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-08-18 16:32 EST ------- Again, using my review checklist: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/review-checklist.txt 1. No rpmlint output. Yay! 2. Package appears to meet Naming Guidelines. 3. Spec is named hnb.spec. 4. Package seems to meet the Packaging Guidelines, too. 5. Package licensed GPL... 6. ...as the spec claims. 7. COPYING in included in %doc. 8. Spec appears to be American English...not perfect (incomplete sentence in %description), but English enough. 9. Spec is readable. 10. Tarball matches upstream. Err, sort of; will elaborate below. 11. Package builds for i386 & ppc (the two supported archs I have). 12. n/a, AFAIK. 13. BuildReq's ncurses-devel, which seems valid enough. 14. n/a 15. n/a 16. n/a 17. n/a, doesn't create any directories (besides %doc, which it does own). 18. No duplicate %files entries. 19. %defattr looks good. 20. %clean looks good. 21. Macro use appears consistent. 22. Package contains only code, AFAICS. 23. Documentation is minimal. 24. %doc files don't appear to affect runtime. 25. No header/static libraries. 26. No .pc files. 27. No library files. 28. No -devel subpackage. 29. No .la files. 30. No GUI applications. 31. Doesn't own any directories besides %doc, which I doubt any other packages own. :) 32. n/a, already has COPYING. 33. No translations available, that I immediately see. 34. Package builds in Plague. 35. I verified i386/ppc, submitter says he built it on x86_64. 36. Package runs, and certainly appears to work! 37. No scriptlets. 38. No subpackages. As discussed on IRC, the submitted version (1.9.18) isn't listed in their download section, only behind a link on their page leading to a directory supposedly containing hnb-1.9.18pre3. While (as you said, and I agree) the site looks fairly abandonned, I'd appreciate if you'd attempt to contact the authors to get them to make the release a teeny bit more official. Also, keep in mind that if the project *is* abandonned, you're probably responsible for fixing any critical bugs with the package that might come up. Anyways, since this submission meets the guidelines as far as I understand them, I think we can call this APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:49:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182049.k7IKnEmw013743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 16:39 EST ------- I don't see you in owners.list; do you require sponsorship? Is there an upstream location for the source? You should provide a URL to the packages main page and make Source0: a full URL so that reviewers can compare against the upstream source. (I'm guessing that http://free.linux.hp.com/~pmoore/projects/linux_cipso/ is the upstream.) You don't use the %{?dist} tag, which is not strictly required but is recommended because it greatly simplifies maintainance across multiple releases. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Your build root is not the recommended one: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) No %{?_smp_mflags} on your make line. If the package won't build in parallel, please add a comment indicating that. Note that this is not a complete review; I'm just commenting on a few things I noticed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 20:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203039] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182054.k7IKsuRP014411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-08-18 16:45 EST ------- Looks like we missed two things: 1) libvirt has an ExclusiveArch that I needed to match, and 2) building on rawhide is broken due to a missing dependency in libvirt-devel. I've hopefully fixed both, andI'm testing mock builds now. Anyway, branches have been created, so I'm going to close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 21:12:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182112.k7ILCs7G016297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2006-08-18 17:03 EST ------- > I don't see you in owners.list; do you require sponsorship? I'm not 100% sure what that means. I completed the CLA request successfully. However step three[1] gives me a traceback, if I try and add myself to the cvsextras group (which I assumed I needed to be in, but I'm not sure) ... so I just tried creating a package review request. All the changes to the packaging that you requested have been done (same spec file URL): http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools-0.16-3.src.rpm [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 21:23:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203205] New: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203205 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkonrath at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-7.src.rpm Description: The PHPeclipse plugin allows developers to write PHP webpages and scripts in Eclipse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 21:34:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203180] Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182134.k7ILYI9j017873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hnb - Hierarchical Notebook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203180 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-18 17:24 EST ------- Imported, added dist tag which we both missed, built successfully for devel, requested FC-5 branch. Thanks for the speedy review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 21:49:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182149.k7ILnfpR018743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 17:40 EST ------- I know it's hideously long, but the entire process document is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors And there's a helpful bit at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored The bottom line is that you have to be sponsored in order to receive a cvsextras account and so you need to find a willing sponsor. My plate is a bit full at the moment, unfortunately, since I've just today sponsored someone else from Red Hat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 21:50:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182150.k7ILosu6018831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 17:41 EST ------- OK, I'll go ahead and review this. The links at the top are the only ones I could find for the package; is that actually the current version? First off, it doesn't build due to a lack of ncurses-devel. Once I add that it does build. Here's what rpmlint says: W: xfsdump symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/xfsrestore /sbin/xfsrestore W: xfsdump symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/xfsdump /sbin/xfsdump Indeed, these should be relative symlinks. Plus there are tons of these in the debuginfo package: W: xfsdump-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/xfsdump-2.2.38/dump/inv_stobj.c ../inventory/inv_stobj.c It seems that rpmbuild doesn't include the "common" directory in the package for whatever reason. I don't know how to convince it to do so. I guess that if it were a big deal you could flatten the links. Unfortunately I don't know whether it's a big deal or not so I'll have to ask around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 22:03:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187325] Review Request: jaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182203.k7IM3rgO019410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187325 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 17:54 EST ------- Closing this bug and blocking FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 22:29:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182229.k7IMTZOk020535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-18 18:19 EST ------- About the whole obsoletes discussion, since mesa-libGLw is in FC-5 already (mesa-)libGLw can be introduced into FE for FE-6 at its earliest, FE-6 should only be used with FC-6 in which case all those obsoletes for packages which we haven't shipped for a while can be dropped, since those will all have been replaced with newer packages already because they are obsoleted by packages in FC-6. So depending on the name we should include an Obsoletes: mesa-libGLw (if we choice libGLw as name), or no obsoletes at all. Which name is the best depends on if we are planning to ever ship an alternative libGLw if the answer is most likely not, then libGLw is the best name IMHO. Last about the discussion of the conditional building with / without somestuff, I would personally prefer to see it removed but I won't insist. The same goes for the dri stuff, AFAIK that is irrelevant for this package when build without the rest of Mesa and thus should preferably be removed. when it comes to spec files less often is more. I also have a question, who is the submitter of this package review? I assume its ajax (ajackson at redhat.com), but some of the comments above have confused me. Rex (Dieter) in the light of the openmotif saga it would be nice to get this into extras soon, I asume you're astill going todo the review? Maybe you can post a short list of must and should fix items so that Ajax can have a go at those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 22:48:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182248.k7IMmcJS021314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jima at beer.tclug.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-08-18 18:38 EST ------- Using my own review checklist: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/review-checklist-1.1.txt 1. No rpmlint output, good. 2. The package doesn't use the upstream name (diskdev_cmds), as recommended by the Package Naming Guidelines. However, the upstream name isn't particularly descriptive, and your choice is. I think the name is acceptable. 3. Spec is hfsplus-tools.spec, check. 4. As far as I can tell, this package meetings the Packaging Guidelines. 5. Licensed under Apple Public Source License, verified OSI-approved by http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apsl-2.0.php 6. Spec lists license as "Apple Public Source License" -- should it be this or "APSL"? Most licenses seem to be abbreviated, but this is the first APSL-licensed package in Fedora I've seen (and I checked all of FC5/FE5). 7. Package doesn't contain a copy of the license text -- submitter has acquired it as suggested by a quasi-reviewer (thanks Tibbs!). 8. Spec is written in American English. 9. Spec is legible, but slightly confusing -- fortunately the submitter made lots of comments. 10. Source/patch match upstream, as verified by md5sum. 11. Package built on i386/ppc, the two supported architectures I have. 12. n/a, I suspect. 13. I imagine all BuildReqs are listed; the package built in Plague. 14. n/a 15. No shared libraries (or libraries at all). 16. n/a 17. Doesn't create any directories (besides %doc). 18. No duplicate %files entries. 19. %defattr looks okay. 20. %clean looks good. 21. Macro use appears consistent. 22. Package contains code (and associated documentation). 23. %doc is one file; probably not excessive. 24. %doc does not affect runtime of software. 25. No headers or static libraries. 26. No .pc files. 27. No library files. 28. No -devel subpackage. 29. No .la files. 30. No GUI apps. 31. Package owns files owned by hfsplusutils, but has an appropriate Conflicts entry. hfsplusutils' most recent upstream release appears to be over four years old; I'm not sure if offering a more current alternative is much of a crime. (I'd like to hear some more feedback on this, though.) 32. Release tag contains %{?dist}. 33. The tarball lacks a text copy of the license; you may want to query upstream to include it. (Optional.) 34. No translations are available, as far as I'm aware. 35. The package built in Plague for i386 & ppc. 36. I can't verify x86_64 for lack of hardware, so I can't guarantee this. 37. I specifically reconnected the Mac OS X hard drive in one of my PPC systems to test this program: # fsck.hfsplus /dev/hda9 ** /dev/hda9 ** Checking HFS Plus volume. ** Checking Extents Overflow file. ** Checking Catalog file. ** Checking multi-linked files. ** Checking Catalog hierarchy. ** Checking volume bitmap. ** Checking volume information. ** The volume Macintosh HD appears to be OK. Not a surefire test, but it definitely didn't segfault. 38. I don't see any scriptlets. 39. n/a, no subpackages. I'd like to get some public opinion on the hfsplus-tools vs. hfsplusutils issue (and the License tag, too), but aside from that, I don't see anything holding this package up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 23:02:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182302.k7IN2RgT021726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew.| |edu) | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-08-18 18:52 EST ------- Uber-reviewer Tibbs chimed in and didn't see anything wrong with either matter, so I'm putting the APPROVED stamp on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 23:22:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182322.k7INMDMl022383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-18 19:12 EST ------- IMO, items 1-4 in comment #13 should be addressed. In light of comments, skip suggestion 5. After that, we're real close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 23:26:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] New: Review Request: libgalago-gtk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/libgalago-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/libgalago-gtk-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: A collection of widgets that work with the Galago desktop presence framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 18 23:33:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608182333.k7INX2FQ022671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-18 19:23 EST ------- Re: Obsoletes, item 2. I'll leave that optional(SHOULD), even though imo they're not needed anymore, mharris feels strongly otherwise (comment #18), so I'll defer to his uber-supreme X11 judgement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 00:42:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197764] Review Request: hfsplus-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190042.k7J0gcoT024556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hfsplus-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197764 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 20:33 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review, jima! My iPod thanks you as well ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 00:56:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202913] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190056.k7J0uscV024907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP - Publish POE event handlers via SOAP over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202913 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 20:47 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 01:01:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190101.k7J116cL025058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-18 20:51 EST ------- Nuts. I hate it when I miss obvious BR's.... The skipped tests are due to a gconf client not being available inside the mock chroot. There are other tests (a very few) and the dependent tests are properly skipped, so I didn't nix the test suite. I'll make the other requested changes and post a new spec/srpm shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 01:03:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188997] Review Request: magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190103.k7J133Bd025109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188997 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 20:53 EST ------- No response from the package submitter in four months and the needinfo ping went out three weeks ago. I'm closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 01:05:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187613] Review Request: sm_tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190105.k7J15l8m025256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sm_tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187613 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 20:56 EST ------- I will close this bug in one week if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 01:07:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178932] Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190107.k7J17HWE025309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178932 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 20:57 EST ------- I will close this bug in one week if there is no response from the package submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 01:10:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190110.k7J1AtEj025380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 21:01 EST ------- Andreas, do you still want to try to get this in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 01:42:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190142.k7J1gNp6026158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 21:32 EST ------- This does build fine in mock (x86_64, rawhide). rpmlint says: W: socat doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/socat-1.5.0.0/proxy.sh /bin/bash W: socat doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/socat-1.5.0.0/proxyecho.sh /bin/bash W: socat doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/socat-1.5.0.0/daemon.sh /bin/sh W: socat doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/socat-1.5.0.0/ftp.sh /bin/sh W: socat doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/socat-1.5.0.0/gatherinfo.sh /bin/sh W: socat doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/socat-1.5.0.0/mail.sh /bin/sh Documentation should not be executable. I'll go ahead and work up a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 01:48:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190148.k7J1m79V026344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 02:32:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] New: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcbw at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/csound/csound.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/csound/csound-5.03.0-1.src.rpm Description: Csound is a sound and music synthesis system, providing facilities for composition and performance over a wide range of platforms. It is not restricted to any style of music, having been used for many years in at least classical, pop, techno, ambient... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 03:54:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190354.k7J3sW8V032608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 23:44 EST ------- So all of the problems I see arise from those six executable bits of documentation. A quick chmod should fix them up. * source files match upstream: 84b709de13e236198a4606fb4b80e123 socat-1.5.0.0.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: socat = 1.5.0.0-1.fc6 = /bin/bash X /bin/sh libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are appropriate (executable documentation) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 04:05:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190405.k7J454gW000732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-18 23:55 EST ------- I didn't see any warnings from mockbuild. I do see a pile of compiler warnings of the form: dump_video.c:98: warning: suggest parentheses around + or - inside shift but I'm sure you see those yourse.f The only rpmbuild warning is: W: theora-exp-devel no-documentation which is fine. I'll give this a full review soon if nobody else takes it. It may be a couple of days, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 04:13:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190413.k7J4Dtrg001253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From dirtyepic.sk at gmail.com 2006-08-19 00:04 EST ------- re: the build error, we recently had a user encounter the same thing with socal-1.4.3.1. i don't know if the causes are the same, but thought you might find it helpful in some way. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 06:56:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 02:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190656.k7J6uAkK005657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-19 02:46 EST ------- Quick update: I moved the files from %{perl_vendorarch} to %{_libdir}/%{name}, without changing anything else, and the game still seemed to run with no problems. I'll try it on a clean system tomorrow just to be sure, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 07:22:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 03:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190722.k7J7Mpx4006246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-19 03:13 EST ------- I've fixed python issue. Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/fmio-2.0.8-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 07:45:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 03:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190745.k7J7jMG1007417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-19 03:35 EST ------- If we do item 1 (name it mesa-libGLw) then is should have a virtual provides libGLw-devel, just like mesa-libGL-devel provides libGL-devel, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 08:05:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190805.k7J85tRO008722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gcin - |Review Request: gcin - |Chinese input method server |Chinese input method for |for Traditional Chinese |Traditional Chinese AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |petersen at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 03:56 EST ------- Thanks for all your work on this. I just tested it on my x86_64 and it seems to work ok (though I'm not very familiar with TC). A couple of comments: Is the -devel subpackage really necessary? Are there any extensions to gcin that would use the include file it contains? Probably it would be clearer to rename the xinput file from gcin to xinput-gcin say. I will attach a patch for the spec file to improve it further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 08:13:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190813.k7J8D5sw009088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 04:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134501) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134501&action=view) gcin.spec-3.patch More necessary improvements. - don't use configure macro - add .conf suffix to xinput.d file and update install scripts for fc6 - move lib to libdir and drop ld.so.conf.d file - other minor cleanup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 08:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190814.k7J8EJqK009171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 08:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190844.k7J8inrD010592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 04:35 EST ------- [I forgot to thanks all the earlier reviewers for their work on this too.:)] Also you buildrequire desktop-file-utils but don't use it I think. You probably should to install the .desktop file with it or else remove it entirely. See . Once all these things are fixed I think the package can be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 08:49:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190849.k7J8nZYG010757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 04:40 EST ------- Note the changes I made in %post/%preun are only for fc6. Since like you had is needed for fc5 and earlier btw. It is hope to you how you want to handle that: either using %{fedora} and different .spec files on branches say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 09:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 05:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608190929.k7J9TOu9012265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-19 05:19 EST ------- Petersen, thanks for your spec patch These days I have read all http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/* documents. I merge your spec patch and create a new version, and mock build cleanly for fc6 and fc5. The New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 10:55:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191055.k7JAtiKQ017506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 06:46 EST ------- Thanks. What do you think about removing the -devel package? You still need to install the desktop file in %install: check some other spec files for examples, and then you can restore the desktop-file-utils buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 10:57:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191057.k7JAvO3N017615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 06:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134505) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134505&action=view) gcin-5.patch a few more fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 11:20:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191120.k7JBK3hl018439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-19 07:10 EST ------- I had email to the upstream author and ask him about the header file is necessary? I am waiting for his reply. If the header file is not necessay, then the -devel package can be removed. About desktop file: "make install" already install "%{_datadir}/applications/gcin-setup.desktop" What should I do? Remove gcin-setup.desktop and then use "desktop-file-install" in %install? Another question, should I use gcin.desktop rather than gcin-setup.desktop? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 11:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191140.k7JBe6VR019154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From maestronn at wowway.com 2006-08-19 07:30 EST ------- Browsing to sites with flash 9 causes my X session/server to restart on my x86_64 running rawhide. I'm not sure if it's because of flash 9 but it happens on sites like gap.com & myspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 11:42:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196281] Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191142.k7JBg5Wg019270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-manual-en - English language PHP manual Alias: php-manual-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196281 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-08-19 07:32 EST ------- Imported & built - job #14355. Thanks for all the input! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 13:05:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191305.k7JD5Exs021249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-19 08:55 EST ------- Hans' suggestion makes sense: 6. after 1, main pkg SHOULD Provides: libGLw and -devel SHOULD Provides: libGLw-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 13:30:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191330.k7JDUaPA021839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-19 09:20 EST ------- I fixed with the gcin-5.patch and use desktop-file-install in %install (ref. from scim's spec file) The New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 17:22:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191722.k7JHMDZL028210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-19 13:12 EST ------- Jens, while it's great that you're reviewing this (as I don't really have the expertise to review it properly) the fact remains that because this is a FE-NEEDSPONSOR ticket, and according to the current rules for contributorship the review must be done by a sponsor. This does sort of put us in a bit of a quandary, however, as there might not be an available sponsor. Might you be willing to co-maintain this package? (Assuming of course that Chang would agree.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 19:03:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191903.k7JJ3vIF002022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com.| |au) | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-19 14:54 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kdmtheme-1.1.2-2.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kdmtheme.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 19:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608191905.k7JJ5Tig002113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com.| |au) | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-19 14:55 EST ------- I'm back :) Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kmenu-gnome-0.6-3.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kmenu-gnome.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 19:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] New: Review Request: kpolynome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 Summary: Review Request: kpolynome Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome-0.1.2-1.src.rpm Description: KPolynome is a program to calculate mathematical polynomes based on given data coordinates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:04:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192004.k7JK4gqJ004098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |toshio at tiki-lounge.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-19 15:54 EST ------- MD5Sums: ef45084bb065b11def33ef7885ee694b postgresql_autodoc-1.25-3.src.rpm f61071a23f6b34f948bbf799de91e8e4 postgresql_autodoc-1.25.tar.gz 72f9c48a19b9a0d2999f1274e0e4398d postgresql_autodoc.spec Blockers: * Package installs to %{_datadir}/pgsql but it neither owns the directory nor depends on anything which requires it. This may be a bug in the postgresql packaging. Care to ask Tom Lane if the postgresql package rather than postgresql-server should own %{_datadir}/pgsql? I don't know the purpose of the directories well enough to judge. * Package does not own %{_datadir}/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc Cosmetic: * Perl packages typically have virtual provides detailing what perl dependencies they are providing. The prefered way to Require perl modules is through this virtual provide method. So instead of BuildRequires: perl-HTML-Template BuildRequires: perl-Pg-DBD you want to have: BuildRequire: perl(DBD::Pg) BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Template) * Using %{?dist} in the release makes upgrades across Fedora Core releases work more or less seamlessly. Consider adding %{?dist} to the end of your Release: tag. * The package does not come with a detached license file. You should ask upstream to include one next time they release a tarball. (Since the license is included as part of the source code and this is a script so it is in the installed package, this is not a blocker. But it is convenient for end-users to have this.) * When manually installing files in the spec file you should try to preserve the file timestamps. This can be done with cp -p in your Questions: * If I'm reading the source correctly, this package will only work with postgresql, not other db's that use the perl DBI interface. But the Requires picked up by rpm do not include perl(DBD::Pg). Should there be a Requires: perl(DBD:Pg) in the spec? * Running the program just errors for me. Any clues? $ postgresql_autodoc -d orchard --password='XXXXX' Can't call method "finish" on an undefined value at /usr/bin/postgresql_autodoc line 1203. * It appears that the only method for providing a password to use when connecting to the database is via the commandline. This is insecure as it allows another user to see the password with something as simple as the "ps" command. It would be a very good idea to ask upstream for other methods of sending the password: prompt, config file, etc. Good: * Source matches upstream * Package follows naming guidelines. (The _ comes from the upstream project). * spec file name matches the package name. * The license is original BSD and matches in SOURCE and spec file. * The spec file is readable. * No locales so %find_lang is not present. * Not a library package. * Not relocatable. * Does not contain duplicate files. * Package has a proper %clean section. * Code, not content. * Macros are used consistently. * No %doc affects the application runtime. * Not a GUI application. * Does not own directories or files owned by someone else. * No scriptlets. * Builds in mock. * Permissions are okay. Notes: * rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint postgresql_autodoc-1.25-3.* W: postgresql_autodoc no-documentation Which is ignorable because the package doesn't provide any documentation at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:08:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192008.k7JK8Bpc004177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kpolynome |Review Request: kpolynome ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-19 15:58 EST ------- Quick, not-official review: * mock build fails. You have to add autoconf and automake BRs. * rpmlint gives a lot of output: E: kpolynome script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/AUTHORS W: kpolynome dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpolynome/common /usr/ share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kpolynome symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpolynome/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kpolynome zero-length /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/README E: kpolynome script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/NEWS W: kpolynome dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/hu/kpolynome/common /usr/ share/doc/HTML/hu/common W: kpolynome symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/hu/kpolynome/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/hu/common E: kpolynome script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/COPYING E: kpolynome script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/ChangeLog You should change doc files permissions in %%prep section and probably remove README file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:14:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192014.k7JKE9AU004290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-19 16:04 EST ------- Okay, with that fix, it's good to go. I can't spot anything which breaks any of the guidelines. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192023.k7JKN6ia004506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-08-19 16:13 EST ------- I forgot to look into %%files section in your spec file. There is a few things you have to correct. Your package doesn't own directories that it creates. For example, RPM creates %{_datadir}/apps/%{name} directory, but during uninstall, it won't be deleted. Why? Because it is refering to file (%{name}ui.rc), not directory. Idem with HTML-doc files. You have to refer to whole directory, not to particular files. So, your %%files section should look like: %{_datadir}/apps/%{name} %{_docdir}/HTML/en/%{name} etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:34:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192034.k7JKYhME004830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-19 16:25 EST ------- Hello, > Blockers: > * Package installs to %{_datadir}/pgsql but it neither owns the directory nor > depends on anything which requires it. This may be a bug in the postgresql > packaging. Care to ask Tom Lane if the postgresql package rather than > postgresql-server should own %{_datadir}/pgsql? I don't know the purpose of > the directories well enough to judge. After thinking a bit, I realized that it is my bad: I've changed the dependency. > * Package does not own %{_datadir}/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc Fixed. > Cosmetic: > * Perl packages typically have virtual provides detailing what perl > dependencies they are providing. The prefered way to Require perl modules > is through this virtual provide method. So instead of > BuildRequires: perl-HTML-Template > BuildRequires: perl-Pg-DBD > you want to have: > BuildRequire: perl(DBD::Pg) > BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Template) Fixed. > * Using %{?dist} in the release makes upgrades across Fedora Core releases > work more or less seamlessly. Consider adding %{?dist} to the end of your > Release: tag. Fixed. > * The package does not come with a detached license file. You should ask > upstream to include one next time they release a tarball. (Since the > license > is included as part of the source code and this is a script so it is in the > installed package, this is not a blocker. But it is convenient for > end-users to have this.) Ok, let's keep it for the future. > * When manually installing files in the spec file you should try to preserve > the file timestamps. This can be done with cp -p in your Done. > Questions: > * If I'm reading the source correctly, this package will only work with > postgresql, not other db's that use the perl DBI interface. But the > Requires picked up by rpm do not include perl(DBD::Pg). Should there > be a Requires: perl(DBD:Pg) in the spec? Yeah, fixed. > * Running the program just errors for me. Any clues? > $ postgresql_autodoc -d orchard --password='XXXXX' > Can't call method "finish" on an undefined value at > /usr/bin/postgresql_autodoc line 1203. Works for me: # postgresql_autodoc -d test -u postgres --password test -l /usr/share/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc/ (in cleanup) dbd_st_destroy called twice! at /usr/bin/postgresql_autodoc line 199. DBI handle 0x9bad4c4 has uncleared implementors data at /usr/bin/postgresql_autodoc line 199. dbih_clearcom (sth 0x9bad4c4, com 0x9e2ec38, imp DBD::Pg::st): FLAGS 0x100113: COMSET IMPSET Warn PrintError PrintWarn PARENT DBI::db=HASH(0x9baca20) KIDS 0 (0 Active) IMP_DATA undef NUM_OF_FIELDS -1 NUM_OF_PARAMS 0 Producing test.dia from /usr/share/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc//dia.tmpl Producing test.dot from /usr/share/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc//dot.tmpl Producing test.html from /usr/share/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc//html.tmpl Producing test.neato from /usr/share/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc//neato.tmpl Producing test.xml from /usr/share/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc//xml.tmpl Producing test.zigzag.dia from /usr/share/pgsql/postgresql_autodoc//zigzag.dia.tmpl > * It appears that the only method for providing a password to use when > connecting to the database is via the commandline. This is insecure as it > allows another user to see the password with something as simple as the > "ps" command. It would be a very good idea to ask upstream for other methods > of sending the password: prompt, config file, etc. AFAIK it can use environmental variable for the password stuff. Thanks for the review. The new spec and srpm will be up shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:36:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192036.k7JKaJQl004883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-19 16:26 EST ------- Hello. Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql_autodoc/postgresql_autodoc.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql_autodoc/postgresql_autodoc-1.25-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:42:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192042.k7JKglZP005036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-19 16:33 EST ------- Hello. New spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/phpPgAdmin/phpPgAdmin-4.0.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 20:46:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192046.k7JKkZgv005135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-19 16:36 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/pgpool.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/pgpool-3.1.1-3.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 22:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192211.k7JMBSd3006922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-08-19 18:01 EST ------- Added openssh-clients and repackaged. SRPM : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm-1.2-3.src.rpm SPEC : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 19 23:23:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608192323.k7JNNHGn008297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-19 19:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Okay, with that fix, it's good to go. I can't spot anything which breaks any of > the guidelines. > > APPROVED Thank you. Then I will try to upload this package. Please check jfbterm, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 01:12:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] New: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/nqc.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/nqc-3.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: Not Quite C is a simple language with a C-like syntax that can be used to program Lego's RCX programmable brick (from the Mindstorms set). Notes: This is built on Simon Perreault's work, which is a closed duplicate of this bug report. About the warnings: I don't know of any other app using the lego group. The udev/group rules are based on fuse's spec, so if this is wrong at least I've got company. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 01:17:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200117.k7K1HVEp011177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-19 21:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Rick, go ahead and make a new submission for your package. You can close this > as a duplicate of the new bug. Bug #203265 is the new submission. I don't have permissions to close this bug though; someone else will have to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 01:18:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200118.k7K1IgAK011206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-19 21:09 EST ------- Simon's original submission is here: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 02:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200235.k7K2ZQkw012699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 22:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Browsing to sites with flash 9 causes my X session/server to restart on my > x86_64 running rawhide. This sounds like the problem in comment 26, but I agree this blocks acceptance. As I noted in comment 29 it seems to be fixed in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 02:54:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200254.k7K2sVNM013129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-19 22:44 EST ------- I agree. Jens will you like to co-maintain this package? And Tibbitts can you sponsor this package? Another information about -devel subpackage, it seems the gcin-im-client.h only need for rxvt/mrxvt. If the rxvt/mrxvt was patched with gcin IM client support, then it is need gcin-im-client.h to build rxvt/ mrxvt. http://www.csie.nctu.edu.tw/~cp76/linux/mrxvt-gcin-0.4.1.tar.bz2 is a mrxvt with gcin IM client patched http://www.csie.nctu.edu.tw/~cp76/linux/rxvt-gcin.tbz is a rxvt with gcin IM client patched But both mrxvt-gcin-0.4.1.tar.bz2 and rxvt-gcin.tbz are a little bit out-of-date, so I think the -devel subpackage is not necessary now. So now I remove the -devel subpackage. The New files with no -devel subpackage: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 03:27:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200327.k7K3RjDn013747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-19 23:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134521) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134521&action=view) gcin-7.patch Fix changelog. ;) Otherwise looks good to me. IMHO the package could now be approved, but unfortunately as Jason pointed out I don't have Sponsor status either... I don't really feel qualified or motivated to maintain this package in the long term, but if there is a strong demand to have it in Extras asap then I suppose I could take it for now. Though I'd really rather we try to find a sponsor for Chung-Yen Chang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 03:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200339.k7K3ds8a014063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-19 23:30 EST ------- Fix changelog: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-8.src.rpm Now I still need to find a sponsor for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 04:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202032] Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200400.k7K40e27014427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-19 23:51 EST ------- Okay. * Build queue for devel requested as id 14365 succeeded. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/14365-efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-6.fc6/ * SyncNeeded is requested for FE-5 branch. Now I close this as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you for reviewing this package!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 04:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200401.k7K41D3P014460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 Bug 201170 depends on bug 202032, which changed state. Bug 202032 Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 05:01:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200501.k7K51VFx015644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-20 00:51 EST ------- Chung-Yen Chang, have you done any pre-reviews of any other packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 05:12:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200512.k7K5CO5b015812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-20 01:02 EST ------- Jens, no, I am new to FE bugzilla. But I will try to do some pre-reviews of other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 05:21:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200521.k7K5Lx2D015992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-20 01:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134522) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134522&action=view) Move per libs to app directory This is a patch to the spec file to move the application-specific perl libraries out of the global perl library tree and into %{_libdir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 05:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200552.k7K5qk7i016563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-20 01:43 EST ------- Thanks! Applied and I've also fixed the inconsistent RPM_BUILD_ROOT usage, new version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble-1.0.0-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 06:44:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200644.k7K6i2SD017598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-20 02:34 EST ------- All necessary items addressed. Game still functions as expected. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 06:49:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200649.k7K6n27f017704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-08-20 02:39 EST ------- Thanks for the information! glad to see it builds with mock now. I've fixed the documentation execute bits in the example shellscripts. I added a few more examples that i hadn't noticed were added. New specfile and rpms available at: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/socat/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/socat-1.5.0.0-2.src.rpm ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/socat/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/socat.spec Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 07:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 03:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608200738.k7K7cKMA019088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-20 03:28 EST ------- I think moving the files but leaving the perl(...) Provides in is worse than leaving the files in the usual locations (and leaving the Provides intact). Moving should be coupled with Provides (and probably Requires due to comment 8) filtering but that's of questionable gain anyway, I'd revert moving the files and doing things as usual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 10:15:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201015.k7KAFMGm010746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 06:05 EST ------- There is a problem. I'm trying to build against gtk-sharp2 (which provides gnome-sharp-2.0.pc). When running through mock, it complains that said gnome-sharp-2.0.pc file is missing (or more accurately, it's not installed). This has only happened since the push to the -2 release on the 19th Aug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 10:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201015.k7KAFbvU010774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 06:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #31) > > Browsing to sites with flash 9 causes my X session/server to restart on my > > x86_64 running rawhide. > > This sounds like the problem in comment 26, but I agree this blocks acceptance. > As I noted in comment 29 it seems to be fixed in cvs. Once again it is not a gnash bug, but certainly an xorg/mesa bug triggered by gnash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 10:27:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201027.k7KARK90011218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 06:17 EST ------- %{_sbindir}/groupadd You don't have anything in Requires(pre) for this (or the similar one in postun) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 10:36:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201036.k7KAakbn011849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 06:27 EST ------- rpmlint warnings .src.rpm : mixed used of spaces and tabs rpm : non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/60-legousbtower.rules dangerous-command-in-%postun groupdel I'm not worried about the src.rpm warning, but am about the two in the rpm (especially the dangerous command one). Fails to build in mock /bin/sh: flex: command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 10:39:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201039.k7KAdaqc012010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 06:29 EST ------- Builds fine normally and rpmlint is clean. I am a tad concerned with this snippet though and have asked for advice on it. There may be both a security and SELinux implication with it. 8--> %{__cat} > 60-jfbterm.perms < 0660 /dev/tty0 0660 root 0600 /dev/console 0600 root EOF %{__mkdir_p} -m 755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d %{__install} -m 644 60-jfbterm.perms \ %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/ <--8 As for the spec file... Good Follows FE dist tags No duplicates in the BRs In american english and with correct permissions No ownership conflicts Includes docs Set out logically It looks good. Unsure Are you installing fonts to %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}? if you are, you'll need to do what you did with fonts package this relies on with mkfontdir Very unsure Security implications (detailed above) Builds cleanly in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 10:47:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] New: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif-0.95.0-1.src.rpm Description: LessTif is a free replacement for OSF/Motif(R), which provides a full set of widgets for application development (menus, text entry areas, scrolling windows, etc.). LessTif is source compatible with OSF/Motif(R). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 10:54:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201054.k7KAslxA012732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-20 06:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.4-2.src.rpm Update to 0.9.4 and the dependency fix included. I haven't touched the number of subpackages as I want some more comments on the current state. These are the current split out packages: pulseaudio-lib-glib2: Client side dependency on GLib 2.0. pulseaudio-lib-zeroconf: Client side dependency on Avahi. pulseaudio-module-alsa: Server side dependency on ALSA libs pulseaudio-module-lirc: Server side dependency on LIRC libs. pulseaudio-module-x11: Server side dependency on X11, SM and ICE libs. pulseaudio-module-zeroconf: Server side dependency on Avahi. Personally, I don't care for packages that pull in everything and the kitchen sink because of some optional components, hence all these sub-packages. I am open to input if the concensus is that some/all of these are excessive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 11:02:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201102.k7KB29Jp013061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 06:52 EST ------- lesstif is never abi compatible with openmotif. The soname provided for the libraries is different than the one of the current openmotif, and corresponds with earlier openmotif releases (lesstif being abi incompatible with the openmotif library providing those sonames). I don't know if it is correct or not nor what should be done. I couldn't get the tests to work, since some bitmaps are missing, which are in http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/app/bitmap-1.0.2.tar.bz2 but don't seem to be in fedora extras or core (I reported that on fedora-devel-list). I'll try to have the tests built, but I think it isn't that important. I don't know if I did the right things with the obsolete/provides/conflicts. It is not obvious that lesstif should obsolete openmotif, maybe only conflict. But in that case the buildrequires should be changed in all the packages depending on openmotif, and openmotif-devel will not be updated to lesstif-devel on upgrades. lesstif-devel really conflicts with openmotif-devel (same header and library names). And I think we should really avoid having openmotif and lesstif libraries installed along since as I said above they are binary incompatible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 11:06:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201106.k7KB6RxI013256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 06:56 EST ------- Looking at the spec file... Release: 1 Needs the dist tag Are both of the obsoletes and provides required (yes, I've read the note about the second one) for both the main package and in the devel package? %package mwm Does this not need requires %{name} = %{version}-%{release} as well? What is lynx sucked into the BRs for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 11:07:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201107.k7KB7ei2013324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-20 06:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol-0.9.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 11:17:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201117.k7KBHJh0013580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 07:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Looking at the spec file... > > Release: 1 > > Needs the dist tag Right, missed it. I'll add it. > Are both of the obsoletes and provides required (yes, I've read the note about > the second one) for both the main package and in the devel package? I don't know. I'm seeking advice on that matter. > %package mwm > Does this not need requires %{name} = %{version}-%{release} as well? I don't think so, since I think it could be linked against a binary compatible motif library. It may be safer, though. I'll add it when I update the spec file. > What is lynx sucked into the BRs for? It is used to transform some html to text for the docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 11:17:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201117.k7KBHxo0013596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 07:08 EST ------- I didn't test an install of the lesstif packages I propose, since they conflict with openmotif and there are apps (from fedora core and extras) I use that need openmotif, but I will test lesstif install (and rebuild the rpms) when the review seems right. Of course lesstif violates the guidelines because it conflicts with a package in core, openmotif, but that's not unexpected... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 11:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201129.k7KBT3X2014016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-20 07:19 EST ------- Wart, I'm waiting for a reply to comment 17 from you before continuing, the raised concern seems valid. (Although I'm getting the strange feeling with this that for some reason people are more stricy about perl(xxx) Provides/Requires then about .so Provides/Requires, because we have similar issues with .so Provides in a gazillion packages). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 12:21:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201221.k7KCLKxX015486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-20 08:11 EST ------- Before fixing spec file: (In reply to comment #23) > Builds fine normally and rpmlint is clean. I am a tad concerned with this > snippet though and have asked for advice on it. There may be both a security and > SELinux implication with it. > > 8--> > %{__cat} > 60-jfbterm.perms < # permission definitions > 0660 /dev/tty0 0660 root > 0600 /dev/console 0600 root > EOF > > %{__mkdir_p} -m 755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d > %{__install} -m 644 60-jfbterm.perms \ > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/ > <--8 > > > Very unsure > Security implications (detailed above) This application (/usr/bin/jfbterm) needs device access right for /dev/console and /dev/tty0. So usual compilation of jfbterm sets sticky bit on /usr/bin/jfbterm, with the permission 4755 like /usr/bin/kon (in kon2-0.3.9b-26.2.1 rpm) With stilly bit, installing 60-jfbterm.perms is not necessary. Note: kon cannot deal with frame buffer. Note: pam has /etc/security/console.perms.d/50-default.perms Original packager (Hideki Machida) and me concluded that it may be better that we use console.perms method than use sticky bit. What do you think of this? Umm. I don't know well about SELINUX.... > Are you installing fonts to %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}? jfbterm requires some fonts (in install stage and on the "real use"), however, these fonts are actually the copies of fonts in other packages (in fonts-japanese, xorg-x11-fonts-XXXXX, and fonts-japanese) Would it be better that I use only the symlink against that fonts? Doing so requires a bit of trick on install stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 13:02:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201302.k7KD2WFT016419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 08:52 EST ------- The patch works for me. It fills /tmp with temporary dirs, but it is better than what was before. It should be documented, however. So I propose to add a README.fedora in the gnash-plugin documentation. I attach a spec diff and a gnash-README.fedora. I also think that it would be better to prefix plugin-tempfile-dir.patch with gnash, such that it is called gnash-plugin-tempfile-dir.patch instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 13:05:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201305.k7KD5BAc016532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-08-20 08:55 EST ------- I have checked in the package to Extras and have built the current version successfully for devel. Now I'm waiting for the module to appear in bugzilla to add the SELinux bug. Paul, did you make any progress on that end? An FC-5 branch has been requested but no one has dropped by yet, probably due to the weekend or so. So we're close to get this bug closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 13:05:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201305.k7KD5OkT016564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 08:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134526) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134526&action=view) explanation of the /tmp/gnash-XXXXXX files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 13:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201307.k7KD7BeY016679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 08:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134527) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134527&action=view) spec file diff to install the README for the plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 13:08:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185205] Review Request: nqc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201308.k7KD8O4e016736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185205 nomis80 at nomis80.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From nomis80 at nomis80.org 2006-08-20 08:58 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 203265 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 13:08:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201308.k7KD8adT016756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 nomis80 at nomis80.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nomis80 at nomis80.org ------- Additional Comments From nomis80 at nomis80.org 2006-08-20 08:58 EST ------- *** Bug 185205 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 13:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201315.k7KDFLoq016934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 09:05 EST ------- Another remark, autoconf is required by automake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 14:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201412.k7KECVdp018149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 10:02 EST ------- Okay, I've had the advice back and it seems like there is nothing untoward security wise. If the package is making a copy of fonts, I'd prefer a symlink rather than bloating the system up with needless copies. A more favourable solution though would be to have the application just use the fonts already there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 15:11:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201511.k7KFBuaM019571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-20 11:02 EST ------- That's probably because things are in better shape with perl(...) autoprovides/requires than generic .so elsewhere, problems elsewhere are not really a good reason to inflict them everywhere, the cases where this arises in perl related packages are pretty rare, and can be more cleanly filtered in these cases than others -- eg. no need to disable rpmbuild's internal dep generator. Note however that comment 17 is just an opinion, not a veto. But thanks for considering it anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 15:21:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201521.k7KFLW8u019857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 11:10 EST ------- Please remove the groupdel from the next iteration of the spec file - it's a recipe for disaster. Does the %pre check to ensure that lego doesn't already exist first? It looks like it does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 15:56:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201556.k7KFuXfl020942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 11:46 EST ------- Checked, it seems to be a problem at my end. pkgconfig is not required. You can remove it safely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 15:57:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201557.k7KFvsud020977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 11:48 EST ------- Time's up for this, can someone deallocate this package so someone else can pick it up. Anyone. Please. Someone. Pick it up and review it ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 15:58:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201558.k7KFw6if021000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-20 11:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Okay, I've had the advice back and it seems like there is nothing untoward > security wise. > Okay, then I use console.perms method. > If the package is making a copy of fonts, I'd prefer a symlink rather than > bloating the system up with needless copies. A more favourable solution though > would be to have the application just use the fonts already there. Umm... It seems that I have to install fonts required to /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm . So, I changed so that requires fonts are installed as symlinks to that directory. The fixed spec and srpm are: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jfbterm.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/jfbterm-0.4.7-6.src.rpm rpmlint says than symlink should be relative (not absolute), whic made spec file a bit complex. This spec file (0.4.7-6) leaves rpmlint messages: W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/shnmk16.pcf.gz ../japanese/misc/shnmk16.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/shnm8x16r.pcf.gz ../japanese/misc/shnm8x16r.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-14.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-14.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/b16.pcf.gz ../japanese/efont-unicode-bdf/b16.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-9.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-9.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-7.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-7.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x16.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x16.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-5.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-5.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/hanglg16.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/hanglg16.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/gb16fs.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/gb16fs.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz ../japanese/misc/jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-8.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-8.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-2.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-2.pcf.gz W: jfbterm dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/fonts/jfbterm/8x13-ISO8859-15.pcf.gz ../../X11/fonts/misc/8x13-ISO8859-15.pcf.gz .... I cannot help but leave this because the "real" fonts are in other packages. I added some font packages to Require. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 16:07:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201607.k7KG7gup021239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 11:58 EST ------- Can you not do ln -s %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/jfbterm/shnmk16.pcf.gz %{_datadir}/fonts/japanese/misc/shnmk16.pcf.gz ? That should avoid the dangling problem (that said, the dangling isn't that big a worry from what I can see) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 16:17:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201617.k7KGHPhK021451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-20 12:07 EST ------- ln You mean ln -s %{_datadir}/fonts/japanese/misc/shnmk16.pcf.gz \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/jfbterm/shnmk16.pcf.gz ? Anyway, %{_datadir}/fonts/japanese/misc/shnmk16.pcf.gz is not in jfbterm but in fonts-japanese and this cause dangling-symlink (not dangling-"relative"-symlink). Also, rpmlint warn about "symlink-should-be-absolute" (although I think that absolute symlink can be allowed......) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 17:13:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203286] New: Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203286 Summary: Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/sjasm.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/sjasm-0.39-0.3.g1.src.rpm Description: SjASM is a two pass macro Z80 cross assembler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 17:24:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] New: Review Request: devilspie Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 Summary: Review Request: devilspie Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ml at deadbabylon.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie-0.17.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A window-matching utility, inspired by Sawfish's "Matched Windows" option and the lack such functionality in Metacity. Devil's Pie can be configured to detect windows as they are created, and match the window to a set of rules. If the window matches the rules, it can perform a series of actions on that window. For example, I can make X-Chat appear on all workspaces, and make a particular xterm not appear in the pager or task list. This is also my first package and im searching for an sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 17:25:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201725.k7KHPnq6023296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-20 13:16 EST ------- IIRC, lesstif used to be parallely installable with openmotif 2.x and it provided compatibility with the older API (1.x) of Motif. Has this changed lately? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 17:32:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201732.k7KHW2LK023483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 ml at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 17:36:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203286] Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201736.k7KHak2t023721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203286 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-20 13:27 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok (but license file not included) * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on FC-5 i386 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no .desktop file required Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 17:41:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201741.k7KHfDmi024037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-20 13:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/nqc.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/nqc-3.1.4-2.src.rpm Changes: - Removed groupdel lego - Added faq, manual and guide docs - Added flex BuildRequires and groupadd Requires(pre) - Added -f option to groupadd (success if group exists) It build fine in mock (x86_64) now. Also, I tested the groupadd -f option to ensure that it doesn't have any problems with the group if it's already present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 18:35:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201835.k7KIZaCY026480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-20 14:25 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.032-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-GConf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 18:40:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201840.k7KIet85026877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 14:31 EST ------- Builds fine in mock. It's 19:37 in the UK which can mean only one thing, it's time for the official UK review procedure... (cue naff 90's music trying to sounds like crumby '06 noises) At 10... No ownership problems rpmlint is clean (well, spaces/tabs in srpm and config file in rpm) builds clean in mock (i386) No dupes No devel, so no pkgconfig, no .so/.la problems software does as it should no problems with documentation consistent use of macros upstream matches the package (version and md5) works fine with smp_mflags And this weeks number 1... It controls the lego! (fade really terrible music) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 18:54:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201854.k7KIs1ou027701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-20 14:44 EST ------- As the review bug says, this package is intended for rawhide/devel only. The licensing is interesting. The spec notes "GPL and LGPL" -- but it's not package wide (that is, there's a bundled library that's LGPL, whereas the main program itself is GPL). Is it worth splitting the library out into its own package, even if just a subpackage of this one, in order to clarify this at the package level? I suppose a relevent question here is: do we expect this library to be used by other packages? I'm inclined to defer to the judgement of the packager. Unfortunately, my mock build (devel/x86_64) fails: -------------------------------- /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o libgif2tif.la -rpath /usr/lib64/aqsis gif2tif.lo ../common/libcommon.la gcc -shared .libs/gif2tif.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../common/.libs/libcommon.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -L/usr/local/lib -ltiff -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgif2tif.so.0 -o .libs/libgif2tif.so.0.0.0 /usr/bin/ld: ../common/.libs/libcommon.a(pixelsave.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC ../common/.libs/libcommon.a(pixelsave.o): could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libgif2tif.la] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqsis-1.0.1/plugins/gif2tif' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqsis-1.0.1/plugins' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16921 (%build) -------------------------------- This prevents me from completing the formal review... I can post the build.log, etc, here if it'll help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 18:57:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201857.k7KIvMcn027849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-20 14:47 EST ------- Ping? Looks like this was imported and built OK, can we close the bug? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 19:00:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201900.k7KJ0k0b027932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-20 14:51 EST ------- No pressure, just want to note the state :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 19:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201902.k7KJ28TI027982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-20 14:52 EST ------- Updated spec and SRPM locations (the University was having trouble with DNS records at the time): Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/papyrus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.3.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 19:12:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201912.k7KJC6Ns028203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-20 15:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Note the xfs-cmds cvs tree on oss.sgi.com contains the xfstest scripts, many of > which run xfsdump/restore regression tests. > > This scripts are run nightly by Nathan Scott at SGI but only > on x86 and ia64 machines. > If anybody has other architectures available to test it would > to good to have those results as well. If there is a test suite, doesn't it make sense to include it in the package as well? Even if it's another tarball, %check makes such testing easy, and we'd be able to take advantage of automating this routine testing during the build on the builders (which include ppc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 19:56:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201956.k7KJuLJr029560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-20 15:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I think moving the files but leaving the perl(...) Provides in is worse than > leaving the files in the usual locations (and leaving the Provides intact). > Moving should be coupled with Provides (and probably Requires due to comment 8) > filtering but that's of questionable gain anyway, I'd revert moving the files > and doing things as usual. My main concerns with leaving the files in %{perl_vendorarch} is that these are application-specific perl modules. They have no use outside of this package. I strongly prefer moving things like this into application specific directories such as %{_libdir}/%{name} instead of polluting the language library tree. I know languages like python and Tcl can handle this with no problem, which is why I advocated doing it here as well. It seems to me that we have two choices here: 1) Move the files to %{_libdir}/%{name} and turn off the autoprovides/autorequires for the perl modules 2) Leave the files where they are and live with obscurities like perl(fbsyms) and perl(fb_c_stuff) in the system-wide perl library tree. If the current standard practice for app-specific perl modules is #2 then I won't argue, even though I think it's a bad policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 19:58:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608201958.k7KJwRue029610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 15:48 EST ------- rpmlint is clean, mock is clean Time for a review I suppose... Upstream version is the same as this package No ownership problems Documentation included Software does what it says it does Consistent use of macros pkgconfig included with R for devel No problems with the devel package No dupes found in the installed rpms No smp_mflags problems I think this is good to go APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 20:26:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202026.k7KKQEoa030230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 16:16 EST ------- It's built cleanly in mock and rpmlint said nothing when I ran the rpms past it, so that's find. Review time consistent use of macros no ownership problems documentation included no dupes in the installed rpms builds cleanly in mock no devel, so no problems with pkgconfig, .so/la etc software works when run no security problems (according to advice) installed rpm has no missing requires I'm happy for this to go APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 20:29:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202029.k7KKTHbM030312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-20 16:19 EST ------- 10 days further on... I'm not going to be able to review this week (starting a new job), so if you can get the update in tonight (20th Aug), I'll see what's happening, failing that, it'll be after the 27th. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 20:52:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202052.k7KKqoHh030859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 16:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > IIRC, lesstif used to be parallely installable with openmotif 2.x and it > provided compatibility with the older API (1.x) of Motif. > Has this changed lately? Indeed lesstif was only packaged for the 1.x compatibility api (up to Fedora Core 3). But following the discussion initiated here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00076.html I am now packaging it as an openmotif replacement. And there is certainly no need for the 1.x api. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 20:55:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202055.k7KKtrZk030940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-20 16:46 EST ------- New version here, that builds in mock http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif-0.95.0-1.src.rpm - BuildRequires automake for the shipped autoconf macro - add %%dist in release - tie mwm to the lesstif version and release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 21:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202155.k7KLtBJe000564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-08-20 17:45 EST ------- It doesn't build on devel because (I think) Evolution Data Server has changed its interface. I need to communicate with upstream and perhaps write patches first... :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 23:17:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202317.k7KNHsPD003446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-08-20 19:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > 10 days further on... Tell me about it, doesn't time fly. http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher/jokosher.spec http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher/jokosher-0.1-5.src.rpm The only response rpmlint gives is on the license which I understand is okay as it is. I have now patched the released 0.1 source and these are also available at http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 23:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203286] Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202332.k7KNWkrs003794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203286 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-08-20 19:23 EST ------- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 20 23:41:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203286] Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608202341.k7KNfpqQ004111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sjasm - A z80 cross assembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203286 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 00:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210015.k7L0F8tu006233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(michael at knox.net.n| |z) | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-20 20:05 EST ------- Hey, just a quick ping to let you know that I am alive, just still in the trows of unpacking/new job/etc etc. I hope to tidy this review up before/by the end of the week. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 00:16:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210016.k7L0GtIX006403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(michael at knox.net.n| |z) | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-20 20:06 EST ------- Hey, just a quick ping to let you know that I am alive, just still in the throws of unpacking/new job/etc etc. I hope to tidy this review up before/by the end of the week. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 00:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210017.k7L0HC86006451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-20 20:07 EST ------- Hey, just a quick ping to let you know that I am alive, just still in the throws of unpacking/new job/etc etc. I hope to tidy this review up before/by the end of the week. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 00:18:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210018.k7L0I6a1006521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-20 20:08 EST ------- Hey, just a quick ping to let you know that I am alive, just still in the throws of unpacking/new job/etc etc. I hope to tidy this review up before/by the end of the week. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 00:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196570] Review Request: mirage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210018.k7L0IbdA006547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196570 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-20 20:08 EST ------- Hey, just a quick ping to let you know that I am alive, just still in the throws of unpacking/new job/etc etc. I hope to tidy this review up before/by the end of the week. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 00:19:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210019.k7L0JEZ9006589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-08-20 20:09 EST ------- Hey, just a quick ping to let you know that I am alive, just still in the throws of unpacking/new job/etc etc. I hope to tidy this review up before/by the end of the week. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 00:58:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203265] Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210058.k7L0wOru007845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nqc - Programming environment for Lego's RCX (Mindstorms) bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203265 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 01:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210123.k7L1NZPJ008726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-20 21:13 EST ------- No rush, this won't get deployed until *after* fc6 is released anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 01:56:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210156.k7L1uwqP010358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-20 21:47 EST ------- Ok, so let's open up another bug against this component directly about the devel issues and close out this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 01:57:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210157.k7L1vwqG010424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-20 21:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > Once again it is not a gnash bug, but certainly an xorg/mesa bug > triggered by gnash. Nod, but until that is fixed it doesn't make sense really to include gnash in Extras. I suggest a bug be opened for that issue and that it block this bug. (In reply to comment #34) > The patch works for me. It fills /tmp with temporary dirs, but > it is better than what was before. It should be documented, however. > So I propose to add a > README.fedora in the gnash-plugin documentation. I attach a spec > diff and a gnash-README.fedora. Ok. > I also think that it would be better to prefix plugin-tempfile-dir.patch > with gnash, such that it is called gnash-plugin-tempfile-dir.patch > instead. Why? :) (In reply to comment #37) > Another remark, autoconf is required by automake. So you mean it shouldn't be in BR? It can be removed I suppose though it makes the dependency on autoreconf less obvious... Perhaps autoconf should require automake too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 03:08:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201170] Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210308.k7L38OSZ013344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfbterm - Japanese Console for Linux Frame Buffer Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201170 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-20 22:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > I'm happy for this to go > > APPROVED Thank you!! * Finally released as 0.4.7-7 to fix the mixed use of %{build_root} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and the compilation problem on ppc (now 0.4.7-7 can be built on i386, x86_64, ppc). http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14387 * SyncNeeded is requiested for FE-5. Now I close this as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you for reviewing this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 04:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210405.k7L455tu014949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-20 23:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I am now packaging it as an openmotif replacement. FE package MUST NOT replace FC packages. 1. Unless openmotif is formally discontinued in Core, you MUST NOT do this. 2. Lesstif is not ABI compatible to OpenMotif, so you are breaking all Motif based apps in FE, once this package should be released. > And there is certainly no need for the 1.x api. Who sais that? 1. There still exist tons of Motif-1.x SW. 2. The Motif-2.x API (==OpenMotif) has changed and extended many times. Lesstif hardly has any chance to follow up these changes, because it's a clone and OpenMotif is the master. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 06:59:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210659.k7L6xLjF020142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-21 02:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > Nod, but until that is fixed it doesn't make sense really to include gnash in > Extras. I suggest a bug be opened for that issue and that it block this bug. This bug will likely be driver dependent... > > I also think that it would be better to prefix plugin-tempfile-dir.patch > > with gnash, such that it is called gnash-plugin-tempfile-dir.patch > > instead. > > Why? :) Because it helps knowing that it is a source file associated with the gnash rpm. Especially handy when you have a lot of patches and source in SOURCES. But it is not a blocker, just a remark. > (In reply to comment #37) > > Another remark, autoconf is required by automake. > > So you mean it shouldn't be in BR? It can be removed I suppose > though it makes the dependency on autoreconf less obvious... > Perhaps autoconf should require automake too? autoconf shouldn't require automake, since it doesn't require automake. In our case builrequires for autoconf is not that bad, it is just an unneeded buildrequires, and the practice (and I think it is somewhere in the guidelines) is to avoid buildrequires when there are allready implied by another package. Not a blocker (other reviewers would consider that a blocker, I think) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 07:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210722.k7L7MhMB021060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-21 03:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > I am now packaging it as an openmotif replacement. > FE package MUST NOT replace FC packages. > > 1. Unless openmotif is formally discontinued in Core, you MUST NOT do this. That's the idea. openmotif shouldn't be in fedora since it is not free software. It seems that you are reading that thread on fedora-maintainers, aren't you ;) I don't plan on importing lesstif once it is approved, there must be some agreement on how and when to proceed, if openmotif is really to be replaced by lesstif. > 2. Lesstif is not ABI compatible to OpenMotif, so you are breaking all Motif > based apps in FE, once this package should be released. Indeed, and that's bad, but unfortunately necessary to rely only on free software. > > And there is certainly no need for the 1.x api. > Who sais that? I don't have any idea on that matter, but I supposed so since it is not shipped since fedora core 3. Did anybody complain? > 2. The Motif-2.x API (==OpenMotif) has changed and extended many times. > Lesstif hardly has any chance to follow up these changes, because it's a clone > and OpenMotif is the master. lesstif tries to follow the 2.1 api. Having a non free application providing more features is not a reason to ship it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 07:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210724.k7L7O8MO021183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-08-21 03:14 EST ------- gtk-sharp2 is not providing gnome-sharp-2.0.pc. gnome-sharp-devel is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 07:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196262] Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210736.k7L7a0WQ021845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196262 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-21 03:26 EST ------- Sorry, yes I was on vacation :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 09:12:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210912.k7L9CMHQ028329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-08-21 05:02 EST ------- Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.6.20060820svn2882.src.rpm Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec Changes: - updated to revision 2882 - added missing Requires: pkgconfig for devel subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 09:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198758] Review Request: gnome-phone-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608210954.k7L9sMrA030919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-phone-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198758 triad at df.lth.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-08-21 05:44 EST ------- OK builds nicely in FC5 some problem in devel related to changes in E-D-S. Would open a bug for it on gnome-phone-manager but it haven't appeared in Bugzilla yet so can't. Thanks to Chris for the review and all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:20:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211120.k7LBKY3f003447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ndbecker2 at verizon.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-08-21 07:10 EST ------- My employer legal dept has OK'd this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211124.k7LBO8pR003645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-21 07:14 EST ------- I've not had time to do anything with the SELinux policy yet. Can you please CC me on the SELinux bug when you raise it? I'm thinking of creating an SELinux boolean to allow openvpn to read files from users' home directories (off by default), much like the one for spamassassin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:24:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211124.k7LBOr85003726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-21 07:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Indeed lesstif was only packaged for the 1.x compatibility > api (up to Fedora Core 3). But following the discussion > initiated here: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00076.html Thanks for the pointer. I guess it's time for me to subscribe YAML... I have at work some legacy Motif apps: if you think it is useful I could try rebuilding them against this new package. Additionally, since in their FAQ [1] I can see: Q: Will Motif be made Open Source in the future? A: Yes, we hope to be able to make a distribution under a license complying with the Open Source guidelines sometime in the future. For now this is as close as to Open Source as we could get. maybe we could try to bugging them for a real Open Source release, otherwise it will be removed from Fedora ASAP [1] http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/faq.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:29:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211129.k7LBTMuw004152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-21 07:19 EST ------- Reassigning to nobody at fedoraproject.org as per the stalled review policy (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:33:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211133.k7LBXRak004410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-21 07:23 EST ------- Well, ASSIGNED is not really the correct status of this package. But i do not see what could be best, now that is can no longer be NEW. Maybe VERIFIED. Do you still need a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:36:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211136.k7LBajrV004663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-08-21 07:27 EST ------- Yes, I have several submissions waiting on a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:38:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211138.k7LBc9rt004928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-21 07:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #17) > > I think moving the files but leaving the perl(...) Provides in is worse than > > leaving the files in the usual locations (and leaving the Provides intact). > > Moving should be coupled with Provides (and probably Requires due to comment 8) > > filtering but that's of questionable gain anyway, I'd revert moving the files > > and doing things as usual. > > My main concerns with leaving the files in %{perl_vendorarch} is that these are > application-specific perl modules. They have no use outside of this package. I > strongly prefer moving things like this into application specific directories > such as %{_libdir}/%{name} instead of polluting the language library tree. And I'm strongly in agreement with Wart. Whilst it's a little hassle in the spec file, it's cleaner on the system the package gets installed into and is less likely to result in future namespace collisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211148.k7LBmJ0J005553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-21 07:38 EST ------- Neal, please try to answer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492#c3 where Hans offer you an opporunity to get sponsored. You silence could interpreted badly. I would like to review the current request (kdiff3), but I cannot give sponsorship. Your future sponsor has priority. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 11:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211153.k7LBrgvL005820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-08-21 07:44 EST ------- OK, this sounds fine. Sorry for the delay, I thought I had already replied to this but it seems not. I will collect 3 packages for review. I think that one that had progressed the farthest is kdiff3. I will also suggest 2 others and get back to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 12:04:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211204.k7LC4NnG006366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-21 07:54 EST ------- Quick-n-dirty items I see: 1. MUST drop Obsoletes/Provides: openmotif, openmotif-devel at least for now(*). No Conflicts either. See also 6. (*) Maybe we could consider using versioned Ob/Pr, say something like Obsoletes: openmotif < 2.2, openmotif21, Provides: openmotif = 2.1, but there would have to be a strong demonstratable need for this (and I currently don't see any). 2. MUST: +BuildRequires: fontconfig-devel, since ./configure says: checking for fontconfig-config... no checking fontconfig/fontconfig.h usability... yes checking fontconfig/fontconfig.h presence... yes checking for fontconfig/fontconfig.h... yes checking for FcInit... yes 3. MUST: +BuildRequires: mesa-libGLw-devel 4. MUST: use versioned Obsoletes/Provides: lesstif-clients, ie, Obsoletes: lesstif-clients < %{version}-%{release} Provides: lesstif-clients = %{version}-%{release} 5. SHOULD: drop Oboletes/Provides: lesstif-1.2-devel, lesstif-2.0-devel I see no purpose for this (anymore), especially Provides. 6. SHOULD: Come up with a better co-installable solution, maybe split out lesstif-clients again (like upstream) so the main pkg doesn't conflict. Conflicts in -clients and/or -devel is ok, imo. But for now, maybe don't worry about this too much... we're going on the assumption (for now) that openmotif's non-OSI license will eject it from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 12:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211215.k7LCFjr0007106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(drzeus- | |bugzilla at drzeus.cx) ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-21 08:06 EST ------- 0. Comment in specfile: # configure --disable-static had no effect; delete manually. FYI, this is most likely due to your using LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool No suggestion here, just an FYI. (: 1. SHOULD/COULD: You could use the %{fedora} macro (defined in Fedora's buildsystem), to conditionalize this bit: # FC5 BuildRequires: libXt-devel, xorg-x11-proto-devel # FC4 or earlier # BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel into something like: %if "%{?fedora}" > "4" BuildRequires: libXt-devel, xorg-x11-proto-devel %else BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel %endif But I'll leave the choice of doing this up to you (you're the one that'll have to maintain it afterall). 2. Regarding split-out server/client libs/modules. Will pulseaudio apps link with these (and automatically include them as dependancies)? If yes and/or dependancies are handled automatically for end-users, end of problem. If no, how will users' get these extra dependancies installed on their machines (other than doing so manually)? Address this last 2 issues, and I'll APPROVE this (and sponsor you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 12:36:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211236.k7LCaAfB007789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-21 08:26 EST ------- FYI, see also: Bugzilla Bug #202527 ? openmotif's licensing is poor and it should be moved to Fedora Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 12:41:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211241.k7LCfoii008148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-21 08:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Quick-n-dirty items I see: > > 1. MUST drop Obsoletes/Provides: openmotif, openmotif-devel > at least for now(*). No Conflicts either. See also 6. I will do that but don't we want to have mutually exclusive packages, at least for -devel, with lesstif-devel replacing openmotif-devel on upgrades? > (*) Maybe we could consider using versioned Ob/Pr, say something like Obsoletes: > openmotif < 2.2, openmotif21, Provides: openmotif = 2.1, but there would have to > be a strong demonstratable need for this (and I currently don't see any). I can't see how it would help either. > 2. MUST: +BuildRequires: fontconfig-devel, since ./configure says: > checking for fontconfig-config... no > checking fontconfig/fontconfig.h usability... yes > checking fontconfig/fontconfig.h presence... yes > checking for fontconfig/fontconfig.h... yes > checking for FcInit... yes Right, missed it. > 3. MUST: +BuildRequires: mesa-libGLw-devel or libGLw-devel? > 4. MUST: use versioned Obsoletes/Provides: lesstif-clients, ie, > Obsoletes: lesstif-clients < %{version}-%{release} > Provides: lesstif-clients = %{version}-%{release} If you like. > 5. SHOULD: drop Oboletes/Provides: lesstif-1.2-devel, lesstif-2.0-devel > I see no purpose for this (anymore), especially Provides. I kept them from the fc3 spec. I'll remove. > 6. SHOULD: Come up with a better co-installable solution, maybe split out > lesstif-clients again (like upstream) so the main pkg doesn't conflict. I don't view it like this. If openmotif is going away, it would be better to split openmotif to have a compat package that only provides the binary libraries (with the issue of the sonames I report above that could be very painfull). If I haven't misunderstood what xmbind is, it should be provided with the library, not in a separate package. And uil is, in y opinion much better in the -devel subpackage. > Conflicts in -clients and/or -devel is ok, imo. But for now, maybe don't worry > about this too much... we're going on the assumption (for now) that openmotif's > non-OSI license will eject it from Fedora. In any other case packaging lesstif to be fully parallel installable would be too much pain without benefit, and may prove hard to achieve, and using the lesstif library would be in that case quite painfull. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 12:53:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211253.k7LCrDRF008689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-21 08:43 EST ------- Okay, I'll add filters for the bogus provides then, do the same to the requires since otherwise things won't work and then post a new version. This may take a few days though since my vacation is over, so my spare time has been drasticly reduced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 12:54:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211254.k7LCsgNP008769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-21 08:44 EST ------- >> 3. MUST: +BuildRequires: mesa-libGLw-devel >or libGLw-devel? Right, better: BuildRequires: libGLw-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 13:14:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211314.k7LDE9on010334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-21 09:04 EST ------- Besides kdiff one other is enough, this one counts too :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 13:28:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211328.k7LDS8NV011260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-08-21 09:18 EST ------- Any news? Thx! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 14:28:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211428.k7LESC9V016794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2006-08-21 10:18 EST ------- The following are available at http://people.redhat.com/sconklin sos-0.1-11.noarch.rpm sos-0.1-11.src.rpm sos.spec The regression is fixed, and a lot of cleanup has been done to remove inaccurate comments, unused variables, and improve readability -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 14:39:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211439.k7LEd4GO017685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-21 10:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > > I suggest a bug be opened for that issue and that it block this bug. > > This bug will likely be driver dependent... Quite possible. Perhaps better would be to update the gnash source to cvs head? > Because it helps knowing that it is a source file associated with > the gnash rpm. Especially handy when you have a lot of patches and > source in SOURCES. Ok, you're right of course. It is so long that I've used the default directories for rpmbuilding, that I had quite forgotten about this namespace issue. (Personally I think it is much saner to build packages from separate directories...) > autoconf shouldn't require automake, since it doesn't require automake. (but autoreconf does) > In our case builrequires for autoconf is not that bad, it is just an > unneeded buildrequires, and the practice (and I think it is somewhere > in the guidelines) is to avoid buildrequires when there are allready > implied by another package. Not a blocker (other reviewers would consider > that a blocker, I think) I'll remove it anyway. Updated package: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-5.src.rpm For the record I don't really like the "flooding" of tmpdirs behaviour very much, but it seems like the simplest secure implementation possible. I guess X uses something similar for its /tmp/xses-$USER.XXXXXX session log files. A better implementation would probably save the .swf files in a directory like "/tmp/gnash-$USER/" owned by USER having permission 0700. It should also take account of TMPDIR I suppose. But I'm lazy... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 14:44:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211444.k7LEi2cP018425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rdieter at math.unl.edu | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-21 10:34 EST ------- Excellent, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 14:46:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211446.k7LEk57W018877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-21 10:36 EST ------- Good work, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:17:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189004] Review Request: irsim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211517.k7LFHJZ7021967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189004 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-21 11:07 EST ------- Ping. Please comment in a week if you are still interested in packaging this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:20:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188440] Review Request: dispatcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211520.k7LFKjbK022239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dispatcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188440 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-21 11:11 EST ------- Ping. Please comment in a week if you are still interested in packaging this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:22:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189004] Review Request: irsim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211522.k7LFMMQE022385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189004 ------- Additional Comments From nomis80 at nomis80.org 2006-08-21 11:12 EST ------- I haven't got any spare time, so I can't do it. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:30:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211530.k7LFULFU023218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-21 11:20 EST ------- Ticket closed due to lack of submitter response as per the stalled review policy (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews). If someone would like to submit a new version of this package for review, please mark this ticket as a duplicate of the new one so that reviewers of the new ticket can easily find the work that was done on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:32:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192310] Review Request: PySyck In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211532.k7LFWtqn023741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySyck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192310 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-21 11:23 EST ------- Ping. Please comment in a week if you are still interested in packaging this. I notice that a blog has replaced the spec and srpm URLs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:39:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192310] Review Request: PySyck In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211539.k7LFdv8U024381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySyck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192310 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-08-21 11:30 EST ------- My mail filter must have missed the earlier two replies -- my apologies. Following the traffic on yaml-core for PyYAML (which is picking up considerably), I don't think packaging this is neccessary. I personally don't like the way YaML is growing in complexity, but it appears there is much more active development there in the 1.1 stuff after all -- and given that, I don't think we really want a bunch of users piling on a dead-end codebase. The application that needed this as a prereq has moved on to other serializing options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192310] Review Request: PySyck In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211541.k7LFfPdF024499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySyck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192310 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 15:47:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211547.k7LFlk2M025005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-21 11:37 EST ------- The Packaging Committee discussed this naming briefly on the fedora-packaging mailing list and decided that it was the maintainer's discretion how to format this portion of the package name. Some upstream packages might name their packages a specific way (pastescript.tar.gz or paste-scripts.tar.gz) in which case it would be good to following upstream's lead is a good indicator. But the maintainer has final say as to what makes the most sense. FWIW, Debian seems to have adopted the same policy, with some packages with a dash (python-twisted-conch) and others not (python-pastescript). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211607.k7LG7lwZ026498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-21 11:58 EST ------- Doesn't build on x86_64 devel, however, something about *** glibc detected *** ../camlrunm: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x0000000000633000 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:09:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211609.k7LG9X4q026594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-21 11:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134570) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134570&action=view) Build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211625.k7LGPufG027286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-08-21 12:16 EST ------- Thanks for looking into the naming issue Toshio. http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-script-0.9-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-script.spec * Sat Jul 29 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9-3 - Require python-paste-deploy * Wed Jul 26 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9-2 - Rename to python-paste-script - Use consistent buildroot variables - Fix docs inclusion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:25:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211625.k7LGPrXw027268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-21 12:15 EST ------- So, the name is up to you. In the mean time the guidelines about ghosting .pyo have somehow changed, it seems like they shouldn't be ghosted now. As it is still a draft, I don't make that a blocker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:41:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192310] Review Request: PySyck In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211641.k7LGfRWa028296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySyck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192310 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:42:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211642.k7LGg0B2028339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-08-21 12:32 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-script-0.9-4.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-paste-script.spec * Mon Aug 21 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9-4 - Include .pyo files instead of ghosting them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:55:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211655.k7LGtKaV029194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-08-21 12:45 EST ------- * Mon Aug 21 2006 Luke Macken - 0.5-3 - Include .pyo files instead of ghosting them. Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, FC-5 CVS branch requested, tagged and built for devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 16:56:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211656.k7LGuO9P029339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 Bug 198287 depends on bug 198288, which changed state. Bug 198288 Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 17:02:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211702.k7LH2fB5029814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-21 12:52 EST ------- Looks fine, builds fine, see review in comment 1. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 17:26:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211726.k7LHQ6V5031526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-08-21 13:16 EST ------- Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, requested FC-5 CVS branch, tagged and built for devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 17:26:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211726.k7LHQTmX031585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastedeploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 Bug 198288 depends on bug 198289, which changed state. Bug 198289 Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 17:26:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198287] Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211726.k7LHQmL0031676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste - Tools for using a Web Server Gateway Interface stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198287 Bug 198287 depends on bug 198289, which changed state. Bug 198289 Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 18:18:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211818.k7LIIsVi004183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidf at sjsoft.com ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2006-08-21 14:09 EST ------- URL in comment #43 should be http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.4-1.src.rpm (-1 not -2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 18:26:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211826.k7LIQxa6005152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-08-21 14:17 EST ------- This is bad. The error appears probably due to new checks in glibc and I guess that on i386 this will also happen. Could you try in a i386 build environment? I mailed upstream about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 18:49:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211849.k7LInrvs007855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-21 14:40 EST ------- Issues 2-5 look good and corrected. I would prefer to have clarification on the License before approving the package. I would be unfortunate for us to try and distribute it under the wrong license. Any word from the upstream authors on License issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 18:58:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203042] Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211858.k7LIwYBl008689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203042 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188265 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 19:20:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203042] Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211920.k7LJKPos010524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203042 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-21 15:10 EST ------- Since epoch is 0, you don't need to list that as part of our Provides. (or in the spec at all) Do you really need to define name, version, and release, just to fill them in at Name: Version: and Release:? Please don't do that. Othewise looks ok, for a java package (: Please create an srpm with the new name and import it as jakarta-oro. We'll stop using the 'oro' module. This would be a good time to change the release string to remove the _. Added to dist-fc6. Please close when built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 19:21:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211921.k7LJLriM010623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-21 15:12 EST ------- http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif-0.95.0-3.src.rpm - BuildRequires libGLw-devel - remove openmotif Obsoletes/Provides - add versioning to the Obsoletes/Provides for lesstif-clients -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 19:32:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211932.k7LJWFl9011184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-21 15:22 EST ------- I got an answer from Christian Hammond 08/17 , he thinks that all bindings to libesexy should be licensed under LGPL, but since he doesn't hold copyright on all the code it's up to Raphael Slinckx who still hasn't answered my mail. If he hasn't answered later this week, I'll ping him again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 19:37:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203042] Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211937.k7LJbIJ1011597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203042 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2006-08-21 15:27 EST ------- Yes, the duplicate definition for name, version and release had already been removed from the package in the latest upstream release, which incorporated GCJ AOT bits (otherwise the same), so I merged that in. All new packages are being rebuilt without the '_NNfc' -- this one will be a .1 (as the first of our builds from this upstream release). The only thing that was not yet done was the removal of Epoch as we are trying to get it removed from all upstream packages so that the next round only have the Epoch > 1 ones specified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 19:44:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203042] Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608211944.k7LJieA2012135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203042 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 20:24:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212024.k7LKOVTQ014815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-08-21 16:14 EST ------- Tibbs, sure. I've just gotten back from my vacation... Care to do a review after I updated the package to current versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 20:49:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196177] Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212049.k7LKnjMr016485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdmtheme - Theme Manager for KDM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196177 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 20:50:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196003] Review Request: Kmenu-gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212050.k7LKo5Y5016536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kmenu-gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196003 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 21:10:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212110.k7LLADFS018019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-21 17:00 EST ------- I am just in the need for a packaged smokeping, so I'd gladly review it if tibbs is bored :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 21:28:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212128.k7LLSgmo019762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-08-21 17:19 EST ------- sounds good. ;D Just gimme a day or four... ;D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 21:47:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212147.k7LLleCD021333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-21 17:37 EST ------- oops I forgot.... http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif-0.95.0-4.src.rpm - BuildRequires fontconfig-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 21:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212151.k7LLpTgP021546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-21 17:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #6) > I have at work some legacy Motif apps: if you think it is useful I could try > rebuilding them against this new package. Indeed it would be usefull (but wait until it is certain that lesstif will replace openmotif...). Are these 1.x or 2.x motif apps? > Additionally, since in their FAQ [1] I can see: > Q: Will Motif be made Open Source in the future? > A: Yes, we hope to be able to make a distribution under a license complying with > the Open Source guidelines sometime in the future. For now this is as close as > to Open Source as we could get. > > maybe we could try to bugging them for a real Open Source release, otherwise it > will be removed from Fedora ASAP That would be a good idea, but I won't do that. I don't feel speaking in the name of fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 21 23:58:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608212358.k7LNwBxA027514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-21 19:48 EST ------- Everything builds fine and now rpmlint is silent. The issues I had are fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 02:02:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220202.k7M22JEx031055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-21 21:52 EST ------- I think there must be some sort of communication problem here. The way this works is that reviewers make comments and point out things that need to be changed. You should either make the indicated changes or discuss why you think those changes shouldn't be made. Instead, you seem to be ignoring most of the comments. The following issues have not been addressed: Still owns %{_datadir}/pixmaps. %description still says Gstm instead of gSTM. In addition, could you also comment on Laurent's comment that gaskpass should be in a separate package? (I admit to not understanding the issue here; perhaps Laurent could elaborate.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 02:10:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220210.k7M2AG3f031325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-21 22:00 EST ------- Axel, there are plenty of other packages I can review so please do take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 03:23:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220323.k7M3NKFl003048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-21 23:13 EST ------- The package now builds and the debuginfo subpackage looks good. The only issues I had have been addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 04:10:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220410.k7M4AALn005730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-08-22 00:00 EST ------- Updated: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse-1.1.5-1.fc6.src.rpm http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse.spec > W: eclipse-subclipse patch-not-applied Patch10: > eclipse-subclipse-1.1.4-plugin-classpath.patch > Not sure what's up here; perhaps a comment as to why this isn't applied would > help. comment added and it was changed to a %Source tag, this patch is applied at install time, not at the "prep" stage > W: eclipse-subclipse no-documentation > Indeed, there's nothing marked as %doc. Is there anything that should be so > marked? There are license files as plain text and HTML changelog files and > such, which seems like they qualify. I added the svnClientAdapter related readme.txt and changelog.txt, subclipse uses eclipse help system, and it is packages the same way that eclipse-cdt (no documentation) > W: eclipse-subclipse symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.core_1.1.4/lib/javasvn.jar > /usr/share/java/javasvn.jar > However, the link should be relative. All eclipse related RPMs package dependencies as absolute links, i just did the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 04:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220458.k7M4w7vX008733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-22 00:48 EST ------- $ rpmlint -i devilspie-0.17.1-1.fc5.src.rpm W: devilspie mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. So I replace all the tabs with spaces in the spec file. After the modify, the rpmlint is cleanly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 07:37:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220737.k7M7bwx1014699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 07:52:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220752.k7M7qZTU015722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-22 03:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134620) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134620&action=view) spec.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 07:55:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220755.k7M7t30k015872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 candyz0416 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |candyz0416 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-22 03:45 EST ------- it is just a pre-review Things To Check - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint -i devilspie-0.17.1-1.fc5.src.rpm W: devilspie mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. So I replace all the tabs with spaces in the spec file. (see spec.patch) After the modify, the rpmlint is cleanly. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is GPL - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK - mock build cleanly for FC5 i386 - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK - MUST: If the package contains shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths, that package must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig OK - this package contains no shared library files - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK - this package is not relocatable - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard ( http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: Header files or static libraries must be in a -devel package. OK - MUST: Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) must be in a -devel package. OK - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK - mock build success and cleanly - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 09:32:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] New: Review Request: evolution-brutus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: colding at omesc.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-1.src.rpm Description: Hi, evolution-brutus (e-b) is an alternative to evolution-exchange for Evolution 2.4 and 2.6. It will add support for Microsoft Exchange 5.5 and later. e-b is destinguished from evolution-exchange by not using WebDAV to connect to Exchange but native MAPI, mediated by a Brutus Server, just like Outlook. e-b currently supports Exchange email, tasks and calendaring, is fully functional and ready for end-users. It has been tested on FC 4/5 and Gentoo. This is my first package so I am looking for a kind sponsor and would very much appreciate a review for inclusion in Fedora Extras. Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 09:37:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220937.k7M9brCR022799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-22 05:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > In addition, could you also comment on Laurent's comment that gaskpass should be > in a separate package? (I admit to not understanding the issue here; perhaps > Laurent could elaborate.) This is not an "issue". gAskpass could be totally independent from gSTM. I think that it has an interest outside of gSTM: one could like to install gAskpass without gSTM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 09:40:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608220940.k7M9e1s0023057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-08-22 05:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134623) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134623&action=view) Patch that create a gaskpass package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 11:42:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221142.k7MBgmIS031076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 jmp at safe.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jmp at safe.ca 2006-08-22 07:33 EST ------- Part now of the DEVEL EXTRAS, build successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 11:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221143.k7MBhoY2031201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 jmp at safe.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 12:42:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221242.k7MCg0gG001726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-22 08:32 EST ------- Yup, x86_64 needs the -fPIC option for the C-compiled modules: Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/aqsis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/aqsis-1.0.1-2.src.rpm Sure we could split libri2rib into a seperate RPM, but I'm not convinced it's worth the effort at this point since it doesn't like as though it is usable outside of aqsis at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 12:53:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221253.k7MCrKW5002883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rdieter at math.unl.edu | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-22 08:43 EST ------- Re: comment #12: > If the review cannot go through with the current tarball, I withdraw my request That is the case (imo). If you refuse to play by the rules (using verifiable, upstream source), then follow through on your threat and withdraw the Review Request (and close this bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 12:54:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221254.k7MCsV1T002962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-22 08:44 EST ------- Thanks, Chung-Yen Chang, for doing a pre-review of devilspie (bug 203288). I think I am able to sponsor you to become an Fedora Extras contributor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 12:54:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221254.k7MCsqCQ003044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-22 08:45 EST ------- Don't forget to close this bug once you've imported and submitted a build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:00:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221300.k7MD02iD003281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:00:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221300.k7MD0Vuq003343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:00:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221300.k7MD0PM2003333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:00:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221300.k7MD0aw1003382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:00:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221300.k7MD0qZW003422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:07:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221307.k7MD7jYG004172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:12:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221312.k7MDC36i004401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-08-22 09:02 EST ------- URLs updated: Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/kdiff3.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/kdiff3-0.9.90-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221335.k7MDZHEV006034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-22 09:25 EST ------- Ok it took a while b/c real life job took a to big toll on my time, but i've finaly found some time to 'finish' this package. Upstream (SuSe) had a new version (even though they still call it 0.6.2) which intergrates a lot of fixes from SLED, but they also reformatted all the source code and changed the library sources quite a bit, so i've had to re-base all the patches by hand, which took a bit of time :-) One of the 'major' bugs it fixes is that on startup 'Favorite Applications' would only show 6 entries, even if more were defined; This seems to work 'correctly' now, and it will show all fav applications on startup now. The new package can be found at: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-3.src.rpm The re-based & re-worked patches are: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/gnome-main-menu-0.6.2-fedora.patch http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/gnome-main-menu-0.6.2-disable-add-to-startup.patch I've made the second one seperate, because i hope 'add to startup' actions will be fixed soon(ish) by upstream, and this way it'll be easier to back out :-) I've also changed the network button action from redhat-neat-control to redhat-neat (aka system-config-network). (In reply to comment #47) The suspend button should show up if g-p-m reports it has this capability, else the button is hidden (In reply to comment #46) I've changed slab (aka gnome-main-menu) to use the vendor supplied default main menu icon, when using an fedora theme this will be the fedora logo, however other themes can override this and put their own icon there.. In your case i think tango inherits the default gnome iconset, and doesn't define the main menu icon, so it uses the fall back one (from default gnome). If you changed tango to inherit "bluecurve, gnome", then you should keep the fedora logo there Do note that the package version now is: 0.6.2-3. This is *not* a mistake, the previous packager choose 1.0 as a uneducated guess, the upstream version number is 0.6.2, which is the tarbal this is based on. To fix this please run: rpm -Uvh --oldpackage /location/to/rpms/slab-*.rpm The 'cvsYYYYMMDD' tag was dropped since its now based on SuSe's gnome-main-menu tarbal, and not a cvs checkout (which btw has the License: GPL tag, so this was an available option) I'd think this package is finally ready for review now :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:38:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221338.k7MDcPKp006426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-22 09:28 EST ------- Woops the previous comment was by me (chabotc at xs4all.nl) but i noticed to late bugzilla was still logged in using Hans's account (he's spend many hours here last weekend to fix a number of dm-raid / mkinitrd bugs). Logged out as hans and logged in under the correct account again :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:49:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221349.k7MDnvBp007396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-08-22 09:40 EST ------- Can you add a link to Pup near to the Pirut entry in the sidebar? I am done with the functionality review. Someone else has to review the packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 13:52:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221352.k7MDqt3L007723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-22 09:43 EST ------- I was hoping the default enabled (i think?) puplet would be good enough for the software updating part (?) i'd like to keep the # of entries in the right column (system commands) to a minimun, else it'll only become scary and confusing to end users again to have so many options there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 14:04:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221404.k7ME4eQA008964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-08-22 09:54 EST ------- Puplet is there only in FC6. I believe this package would also be pushed into the FE-5 branch. Its quite useful to have the ability the directly launch pup atleast in FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 14:34:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221434.k7MEYW8p011862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 14:36:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221436.k7MEaL6P012067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 15:24:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221524.k7MFOp06017303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-08-22 11:15 EST ------- MD5Sums: 2479a3fe9be3d7666c7f44605fa331c9 devilspie-0.17.1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint does not find problems * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: gtk2-devel (by libwnck-devel), pango-devel (by libwnck-devel), atk-devel (by gtk2-devel) Suggestions: * I would remove the 'For example' line from the description, since it seems unnecessary. * Shorten the summary line. I would remove the 'inspired by' portion of it. This package looks good, but before sponsoring you, I would like to see you review a few packages so I get a feel for your knowledge of FE packing guidelines. For more information refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 16:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221651.k7MGpX1H023225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2006-08-22 12:41 EST ------- The test suite doesn't just test xfsdump, it tests most all xfs functionality. There is no specific xfsdump testsuite. It also requires that other packages be installed, and requires scratch partitions available. And it can run for a very long time. The full test suite is probably much to invasive for an rpm %check phase. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 18:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203611] New: Review Request: compat-glibc - stubs and headers for RHEL4 compatibility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203611 Summary: Review Request: compat-glibc - stubs and headers for RHEL4 compatibility Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: jakub at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://devserv/~jakub/compat/compat-glibc.spec SRPM URL: http://devserv/~jakub/compat/compat-glibc-2.3.4-2.26.src.rpm Description: Similar to RHEL4 compat-glibc, contains all the needed stub shared libraries (for ld(1) only, not runtime) and headers so that it is possible to compile and link (a limited number) of programs that will then work on RHEL4. Especially useful because of the ppc*/s390* ABI changes for long double. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 18:51:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221851.k7MIpcY2001903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2006-08-22 14:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Re: comment #12: > > If the review cannot go through with the current tarball, I withdraw my request > > That is the case (imo). If you refuse to play by the rules (using verifiable, > upstream source), then follow through on your threat and withdraw the Review > Request (and close this bug). This was not a threat. And I appreciate if you don't call my acts like that. I removed freetype1 code from the Core package, so I tried to be nice and package it for Extras. If it's too much work for little to no benefit, I don't have the time to do that. I actually did download the tarball you linked to and it's sitting in my laptop waiting for some attention. But that doesn't mean much in this conversation... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 19:00:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221900.k7MJ0wFH003173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be 2006-08-22 14:51 EST ------- Why not add just one item called something like "Leave" that groups all stuff like shutdown, reboot, suspend, logout, lock screen, ... It also shows the harddisk usage of my /boot partition, which is pretty useless, this should be the partition where /home is located. But it starts to look very nice! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 19:25:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608221925.k7MJPamC005661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-22 15:15 EST ------- > This was not a threat. And I appreciate if you don't call my acts > like that. It was what it was, though I apologize for taking the too aggressive tone. I was cranky that I had too many (inactive) bugs not getting fixed this morning, and I took a little of that out on you. > I actually did download the tarball you linked to and it's sitting in > my laptop waiting for some attention. Thanks for the Extras (pun intended) effort. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 20:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222004.k7MK4Vbv008881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-08-22 15:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #53) > Why not add just one item called something like "Leave" that groups all stuff > like shutdown, reboot, suspend, logout, lock screen, ... Hi Bart, thanks for the comments, and its a good idea but please don't confuse me for 'upstream', i'm just the fedora packager who's trying to intergrate an existing product into fedora. SuSe's is upstream, so thats the place where you could report your sugestions :-) > It also shows the harddisk usage of my /boot partition, which is pretty useless, > this should be the partition where /home is located. Hmm heard such things before and have such a problem my self too .. i'll try to take a look into it, but i suspect its just an 'gnome-main-menu' bug that exists upstream too, so no guarantee's :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 20:24:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222024.k7MKO2vf009895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(drzeus- | |bugzilla at drzeus.cx) | ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-22 16:14 EST ------- 0. It was Toshio that did those additions. The Red Hat libtool was added to avoid getting a RPATH on x86_64. 1. I'm blisfully unaware to the the available macros. I'll get that into the next revision, thanks. :) 2. Yes and no, we'll have a look, package by package: pulseaudio-lib-glib2: This is for GLib 2 applications that want to easily integrate with the PulseAudio client lib. As such, they'll have a dependency on the .so file in this package and everything will be peachy. pulseaudio-lib-zeroconf: This is similar as it provides a shared object for automatically finding PulseAudio servers and connecting to them. It does, however, also contain a command line tool that might be of interest to the users. But as apt and yum can fetch based on knowing that tools name (pabrowse), users should be able to pull it in without much trouble. pulseaudio-module-alsa: Failure to have this package will result in error messages about failing to load modules, provided their configuration states that the ALSA modules should be loaded. As ALSA is the standard API, I suppose we could remove this subpackage. pulseaudio-module-lirc: Same result here. This module provides nothing as far as clients are concerned (it allows you to directly control the server via IR), so there will be an obvious error for those trying to use the function without having the package. pulseaudio-module-x11: This is more subtle from a user's point of view. This module provides some extra authentication features (allows you to set the security cookie as a X11 property). I am a strong proponent of keeping this subpackage though as X11 can be a big dependency. pulseaudio-module-zeroconf: This is a server-side feature and will therefore result in complaints about missing modules when trying to use it without the package. So I can accept removing the ALSA subpackage, but the others should stay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 20:30:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222030.k7MKUDda010363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-22 16:20 EST ------- Fair reasoning. So, the conclusion is to (only) drop the module-alsa subpkg (to be subsumed into -lib?), and I think this should be good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 20:42:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222042.k7MKgb0A011233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-22 16:32 EST ------- OK, now what to do with (potential) Conflicts: openmotif ? 1. What left in the main/core pkgs conflict (lesstif vs openmotif)? xmbind? We may want to split that out into -clients again to avoid that problem (for now). 2. -devel: the -devel pkgs conflict (right?), and that's allowable (imo), so having a Conflicts: openmotif-devel isn't unreasonable 3. Since openmotif's status is still not 100% certain, we could do something funky like adding a virtual Provides for motif and motif-devel (and if openmotif ever clears up it's status, it could add these too), so only could add something like (to main): Provides: motif = 2.1 and to -devel Provides: motif-devel = 2.1 (the 2.1 is based on what version of the motif api it provides). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 20:59:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222059.k7MKxZYL012486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-22 16:49 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.4-2.src.rpm Remove the ALSA subpackage. The %{?fedora} macro isn't defined in my rpm though, so I couldn't include that part. Is it perhaps only present on the build system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 21:22:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] New: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-4.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: OpenDX is a uniquely powerful, full-featured software package for the visualization of scientific, engineering and analytical data: Its open system design is built on familiar standard interface environments. And its sophisticated data model provides users with great flexibility in creating visualizations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 21:36:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222136.k7MLaxQh015137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-22 17:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > OK, now what to do with (potential) Conflicts: openmotif ? > > 1. What left in the main/core pkgs conflict (lesstif vs openmotif)? xmbind? > We may want to split that out into -clients again to avoid that problem (for now). I really feel uneasy about xmbind not being with the libraries, but if it helps, no problem. An alternative would be to rename one of the xmbind program (likely for the init script and the man page) to lesstif-xmbind or openmotif-xmbind. > 2. -devel: the -devel pkgs conflict (right?), and that's allowable (imo), so > having a > Conflicts: openmotif-devel > isn't unreasonable Yep, this seems unavoidable. And, I beleive, right! > 3. Since openmotif's status is still not 100% certain, we could do something > funky like adding a virtual Provides for motif and motif-devel (and if openmotif > ever clears up it's status, it could add these too), so only could add something > like (to main): > Provides: motif = 2.1 > and to -devel > Provides: motif-devel = 2.1 > (the 2.1 is based on what version of the motif api it provides). For -devel that would be nice, but for main I think it would be wrong since there is no ABI compatibility. In fact there should even be a way to make package compiled against lesstif require lesstif and for packages compiled against openmotif require openmotif. Indeed the usual way to have library dependencies (using soname) doesn't work well here, as the same soname is associated with binary incompatible libraries. Having a simple Requires: openmotif or Requires: lesstif should be enough, since the dynamical linker may get it wrong as they have the same soname, but then the library names would be the same and they would conflict. As long as the lesstif soname (and library name) differs from the openmotif soname this could be enough. Does this seems right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 21:38:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222138.k7MLcpMS015355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-22 17:29 EST ------- About the 1.x api, should it be shipped? I think not, since it hasn't been shipped for FC4 and FC5 (and I guess FC6) but opinions may vary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 21:46:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222146.k7MLk4uE015783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-22 17:36 EST ------- RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libDtPrint.la /usr/lib/libDtPrint.so /usr/lib/libDtPrint.so.1 /usr/lib/libDtPrint.so.1.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 21:51:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222151.k7MLpRpv016064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-22 17:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > RPM build errors: > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib/libDtPrint.la > /usr/lib/libDtPrint.so > /usr/lib/libDtPrint.so.1 > /usr/lib/libDtPrint.so.1.0.0 That's very weird... There is, in %install rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la and the appropriate globs in %files: %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* and in devel %{_libdir}/lib*.so Could you please attach the build log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 21:55:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222155.k7MLt0Zq016337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-08-22 17:45 EST ------- > > OK, I'll go ahead and review this. The links at the top are the only ones I > could find for the package; is that actually the current version? > > First off, it doesn't build due to a lack of ncurses-devel. > Ok added that to the BuildRequires > Once I add that it does build. Here's what rpmlint says: > > W: xfsdump symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/xfsrestore /sbin/xfsrestore > W: xfsdump symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/xfsdump /sbin/xfsdump > Indeed, these should be relative symlinks. > Ok fixed these up in the spec file. (new spec file uploaded) > Plus there are tons of these in the debuginfo package: > W: xfsdump-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/xfsdump-2.2.38/dump/inv_stobj.c ../inventory/inv_stobj.c > > It seems that rpmbuild doesn't include the "common" directory in the package for > whatever reason. I don't know how to convince it to do so. I guess that if it > were a big deal you could flatten the links. Unfortunately I don't know whether > it's a big deal or not so I'll have to ask around. > I appears that /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh is not picking up the files. using vpath vs symlinks would be the right thing to do. Unfortunately there seems to be some ugly hacks with a .c file picking up a different include file based on which directory is being compiled. Has to do with getop.h for each command the c file is common but it picks up different options based on which getopt.h it finds in the current directory. So ya it appears the debug package is not that trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 22:00:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222200.k7MM0NaW016603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-22 17:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > > Indeed it would be usefull (but wait until it is certain that lesstif > will replace openmotif...). Are these 1.x or 2.x motif apps? Ok, I will wait for this. They are 2.x > > > > maybe we could try to bugging them for a real Open Source release, otherwise it > > will be removed from Fedora ASAP > > That would be a good idea, but I won't do that. I don't feel > speaking in the name of fedora. Well, it should be just a warning to them that something will happen here if they do not act upon. I will try to get some more info and let you know -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 22:21:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222221.k7MMLSrq017460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-22 18:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) Not necessary. This is an x86_64 issue. Apply the following patch: --- lesstif-0.95.0/clients/Motif-2.1/mwm/Makefile.am.lib64 2005-03-26 07:52:24.000000000 +0100 +++ lesstif-0.95.0/clients/Motif-2.1/mwm/Makefile.am 2006-08-23 00:06:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ appdir= $(libdir)/X11/app-defaults -mwmddir= $(libdir)/X11/mwm +mwmddir= $(sysconfdir)/mwm mwmd_DATA= system.mwmrc alt.map README --- lesstif-0.95.0/lib/Dt/Makefile.am.lib64 2005-03-26 07:52:25.000000000 +0100 +++ lesstif-0.95.0/lib/Dt/Makefile.am 2006-08-22 23:56:46.000000000 +0200 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ MAINTAINERCLEANFILES=Makefile.in libDtPrint_la_LDFLAGS= -version-info 1:0 -no-undefined -libdir = $(exec_prefix)/lib +#libdir = $(exec_prefix)/lib if BuildLibDtPrint and regenerate auto* files before %configure: %{__libtoolize} --force %{__aclocal} %{__autoconf} %{__autoheader} %{__automake} -a For some reason, Dt includes don't get installed after that. Also, don't use hardcodec paths like /usr/lib or /usr/include. That's what %{_libdir} and %{_includedir} are for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 23:14:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222314.k7MNEg8C020204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-22 19:04 EST ------- A new version http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif-0.95.0-5.src.rpm - fix in Dt for x86_64, adapted Dominik patch - don't hardcode /usr/include and /usr/lib - add a Conflict for openmotif-devel Dominik, i modified your patch such that there is no need to rerun autoconf, could you please test? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 22 23:17:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608222317.k7MNHu99020471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-22 19:08 EST ------- For the record, it builds with lesstif (bugzilla #203274), so the transition after openmotif is dropped will be quite painless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 00:17:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230017.k7N0H7Su023770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-22 20:07 EST ------- Builds cleanly now, but please use proper English in the changelog and say "Dominik's patch". ;) As for the patch itself, I'd remove the commented line from it, i.e.: -libdir = $(exec_prefix)/lib +libdir = @libdir@ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 02:57:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230257.k7N2v75D029579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 03:34:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202379] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230334.k7N3YJqv031314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202379 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-22 23:24 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 09:03:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230903.k7N93NhX015537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2006-08-23 04:53 EST ------- Hmmm ... the URLs in comment #48 still don't work for me, pulseaudio.spec seems to be the version from 2006-08-20 and pulseaudio-0.9.4-2.src.rpm doesn't exist Curiously http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/public.html seems to contain the latest pulseaudio.spec Am I the only one having these problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 09:06:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] New: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/rawstudio.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/rawstudio-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Rawstudio is an open source raw-image converter written in GTK+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 09:10:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230910.k7N9AGnc015935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-23 05:00 EST ------- Please note this is my 3rd package open for review, but I am not yet an official contributor, so a sponsor is still needed for an official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 09:12:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230912.k7N9CGFJ016060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-23 05:02 EST ------- I guess it was a bit late when I uploaded those. They should work now. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 09:17:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230917.k7N9H4V2016467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 colding at omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 09:47:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608230947.k7N9l02b019324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2006-08-23 05:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134695) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134695&action=view) Patch to spec to build separate jack package When I build pulseaudio, because of having jack-audio-connection-kit installed, the build complains about unpackaged modules: /usr/lib/pulse-0.9/modules/module-jack-sink.so /usr/lib/pulse-0.9/modules/module-jack-source.so Attached a patch to include these in a separate pulseaudio-module-jack package, if an optional --with jack build switch is used. I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it or if there is a way to detect an optional dependency and use it automatically. If you have jack-audio-connection kit installed and build without "--with jack" the build will fail, so I'm sure there's a better way - any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 10:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231018.k7NAIf0l021349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-23 06:09 EST ------- Anything happening with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 10:21:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231021.k7NALWJI021497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-23 06:10 EST ------- Anything happening with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 10:49:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231049.k7NAnFI5023226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-08-23 06:39 EST ------- New SRPM with fixes to all rpmlint warnings: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-2.src.rpm -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 11:11:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231111.k7NBBKQh024532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-23 07:01 EST ------- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 11:12:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231112.k7NBCluj024652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-23 07:03 EST ------- Ping! It looks like mono-debugger is going to be required for the next release of MonoDevelop (due shortly) so this package could probably do with being looked at -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 11:27:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231127.k7NBRxMp025310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-23 07:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.4-3.src.rpm JACK should always be built, so this version has more or less your patch (just no if:s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 12:11:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231211.k7NCB3b4027404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-23 08:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.30-2.src.rpm Removes the old mono hack Rebuilt for new mono packages Added BR mono-nunit Added R pkgconfig for -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 13:05:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231305.k7ND5Gsv030039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-23 08:55 EST ------- Here are some comments from me: rpmlint shows some errors: W: whysynth-dssi incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.3-3 20060122-3.fc5 last changelog entry mentions version 0.1.3-3 but the package is 20060122-3, the other entries may have the wrong version, too. W: whysynth-dssi dangling-symlink /usr/bin/whysynth /usr/bin/jack-dssi-host Don't know, what this means. W: whysynth-dssi symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/whysynth /usr/bin/jack-dssi-host Make sure, the symlink is relative. W: whysynth-dssi macro-in-%changelog __rm W: whysynth-dssi macro-in-%changelog makeinstall Macros mentioned in %changelog must be escaped with an %, e.g. %%{__rm} instead of %{__rm} Package builds in mock, but there are some warnigs in the build log: whysynth_voice.c: In function 'y_voice_note_on': whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here [...] whysynth_voice_render.c: In function 'y_voice_render': whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2171: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2172: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2173: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2174: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2352: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2353: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2354: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2355: warning: called from here whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached whysynth_voice_render.c:2356: warning: called from here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 13:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231350.k7NDoAV7000401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-23 09:40 EST ------- You use %defattr(-,root,root) instead of %defattr(-,root,root,-) - is this intentionally? Why is there no desktop file as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 ? If you add it, please not inline but in an extra file. Why do you use '%makeinstall' instead of the favoured 'make install DESTDIR="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 13:50:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231350.k7NDol1k000444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-23 09:40 EST ------- * Wed Aug 23 2006 Hans de Goede 1.0.0-9 - Filter out the autogenerated Provides for our private perl modules and also filter out the matching AutoRequires to still get an installable package Go get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble-1.0.0-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 14:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231409.k7NE9i3N001870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-23 10:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134711) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134711&action=view) Build log of gcin-1.2.2-8 on fc6-devel with fedora undefined Hello. So I cannot sponsor formally for this package (because I am not a member), who will be the sponsor for this package? I think that this package leaves "little" problem, so it would be better that this package can be released ASAP. The reason I mentioned "little" is because * I can rebuild this package with mock. * however, I canNOT rebuild this package without mock even with proper BR rpms installed because usually %{fedora} is undefined and so Patch5 is applied when rebuilt withOUT mock, this is not right for FC5 and above. Now, FC4 and below FC4 are marked as regacy, so this package can be released only for FE5 and FE6-devel. So, Patch5 is not needed, perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 14:36:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231436.k7NEa2dX004515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-23 10:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > Created an attachment (id=134711) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134711&action=view) [edit] > Build log of gcin-1.2.2-8 on fc6-devel with fedora undefined > > Hello. > > So I cannot sponsor formally for this package (because > I am not a member), who will be the sponsor for this package? It is the submitter that is sponsored, not the package. > I think that this package leaves "little" problem, so > it would be better that this package can be released ASAP. > > The reason I mentioned "little" is because > * I can rebuild this package with mock. > * however, I canNOT rebuild this package without mock even > with proper BR rpms installed > because usually %{fedora} is undefined and so Patch5 is applied > when rebuilt withOUT mock, this is not right for FC5 and above. > > Now, FC4 and below FC4 are marked as regacy, so this package > can be released only for FE5 and FE6-devel. So, Patch5 is > not needed, perhaps? You can define the macro manyually if you wish: $ rpmbuild -ba --define 'fedora 5' --define 'dist .fc5' packagename.spec I think it would be better though if the default (i.e. with the fedora macro undefined) was appropriate for the current release (FC5/FC6) and the extra defines were only needed for the legacy distros, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 14:52:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231452.k7NEqRJE006087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-23 10:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > It is the submitter that is sponsored, not the package. Oh, yes. What I meant was who will sponsor Chung-Yen Chang? > I think it would be better though if the default (i.e. with the fedora macro > undefined) was appropriate for the current release (FC5/FC6) and the extra > defines were only needed for the legacy distros, I have the same opinion. It would be better that the spec file assumes that the distro is FC-5 or above if %fedora is not defined. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231515.k7NFFAq4008406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191036 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:15:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231515.k7NFFYQF008456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |187351 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:19:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231519.k7NFJwlM008809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-23 11:10 EST ------- Re: comment #48: > The %{?fedora} macro isn't defined in my rpm though, so I couldn't > include that part. Is it perhaps only present on the build system? Yes, the buildsystem defines it, as well as a few others, like %{dist}. You can similate that via: rpmbuild --define "fedora 5" -bb pulseaudio.spec That said, package looks good, APPROVED. Now I have to figure out this sponsorship thing. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:21:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231521.k7NFLhSi008979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-08-23 11:12 EST ------- Spec file for 1.2-3 : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/xmms-musepack.spec Please feel free to review, it's been a while, and I'd really like this package to get out of the queue... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:27:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231527.k7NFRf12009889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-23 11:17 EST ------- I am ready to approve, but with the -q to setup. It is not required by the guidelines, but it generates a rpmlint warning, isn't usefull and goes against what is done in most packages. I may approve it without the -q if you convince me that %setup without -q adds anything else than output lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:38:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231538.k7NFcIjV011270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-08-23 11:28 EST ------- I'm CC'ing Matthias (no, not myself) since he seems to be the one taking care of this package recently. I'll attach a new patch. The _important_ fix is to not own the base directories : /usr/share/applications/ /usr/share/gnome/ /usr/share/omf/ The rest is only cosmetic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:39:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231539.k7NFdAvU011373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #120956|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-08-23 11:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134727) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134727&action=view) Spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 15:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231546.k7NFkUSa011915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-08-23 11:36 EST ------- Here we go again :-) I won't try to convince you about anything, just point out two things : - Guideline discussions don't belong in package submission entries, please put the review on hold and start discussing on the maintainers, packaging or extras list if you feel something should be addressed. - From my POV, the -q to setup is silly, and should be configurable in the build system directly, pretty much like defattr, buildroot, clean... but again, this is something to bring up on a public list, not here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231605.k7NG5jKd013327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-23 11:55 EST ------- Fer cryin out loud, let's just bang this out and be done with it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:18:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231618.k7NGILER014097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-23 12:08 EST ------- * %excluding the .la file is probably not necessary, but not bad to do so either. * Provided SOURCE: url didn't work for me, but this did: http://files2.musepack.net/linux/plugins/xmms-musepack-1.2.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:20:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231620.k7NGKD8H014223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-23 12:10 EST ------- Some source files do not have an Copyright / GPL header: fskip.c malloc.c itypes.h util.h About the license file: MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Please ask upstream to add the license and add copyright headers to the mentioned files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:20:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231620.k7NGKZs9014254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #127652|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:20:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231620.k7NGKwwC014306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-23 12:11 EST ------- upstream source checks out: ff7f5f9122d09ad63af9c564046086cf xmms-musepack-1.2.tar.bz2 Everything else is simple, clean... APPROVED. (and please fix the Source: URL, before requesting any builds) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231625.k7NGP7Cm014549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-23 12:15 EST ------- I noticed something else: A BR is: tcl-devel >= 8.4 and in %build you use TCL_VERSION=8.4 It seems to me that because of this the spec file will not work for tcl-devel version 8.6 so you may better use tcl-devel = 8.4 imho. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:27:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231627.k7NGRKi1014711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-23 12:17 EST ------- Sorry for writing so many comments, I forgot to mention that rpmlint shows an error: E: vkeybd non-executable-script /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybd.tcl 0444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:27:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231627.k7NGRan9014736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-08-23 12:17 EST ------- What spec file did you look at? The last link I posted already had the source you mention in comment #26 and it seems to work. All good to go I guess, thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:30:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231630.k7NGUASK014880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-23 12:20 EST ------- Such a felony against the holy -q, assigned traitor! This sad day, a battle I lost ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:33:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231633.k7NGX145015089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-23 12:23 EST ------- I must have looked at the spec from the last src.rpm (1.2-2?). oops. Patrice, sure, mark me a traiter, I just don't see why reviews should be held up on semantics and/or maintainer preferences (ie, non MUST items) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:44:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231644.k7NGiGQn015898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-23 12:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > I must have looked at the spec from the last src.rpm (1.2-2?). oops. > > Patrice, sure, mark me a traiter, I just don't see why reviews should be held up > on semantics and/or maintainer preferences (ie, non MUST items) No problem, I truely approve your felony, since it is a non MUST item :-) But with my high principles on setup -q I couldn't approve that evil specfile ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 16:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231651.k7NGpOMR016220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-08-23 12:41 EST ------- Thanks, fixed in 2.15.92-2.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 17:32:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231732.k7NHWWbn019582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-23 13:22 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome-0.1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 17:41:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231741.k7NHfpMs020256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 ------- Additional Comments From ml at deadbabylon.de 2006-08-23 13:32 EST ------- I patched the specfile and fixed the minor issues and suggestions. New Version: Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie-0.17.1-2.fc5.src.rpm I will try to review some packages the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:11:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] New: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-1.src.rpm Description: Xcircuit is a general-purpose drawing program and also a specific-purpose CAD program for circuit schematic drawing and schematic capture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:26:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231826.k7NIQJgE024437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-23 14:16 EST ------- Request for take over ? Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown-0.8.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231834.k7NIYQ0L025265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-23 14:24 EST ------- I guess the new SRPM URL is http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdeedu-3.5.4-1.src.rpm :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:41:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231841.k7NIfxj9026113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-23 14:32 EST ------- Sorry, I was on vacation. With your latest release, on launching klamav, I'm falling on the error I mentioned before. http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223058851&size=o Same for updating the database :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:47:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231847.k7NIlcIN026678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-23 14:37 EST ------- Well, only for packaging issue. mock build is okay. * %post and %postun calls %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache. Require it as Requires(post) and Requires(postun). * %patch0 -p0 -b . Very cosmetic, however, adding some suffix is perhaps preferable. * chmod 644 %{_builddir}/%{name}-0.1/AUTHORS Why the explicit directory %{_builddir}/%{name}-0.1 necessary? Usually, in %build or %install stage, the working directory is what is written in %setup stage. * Any reasons that document HTML files should be in %{_docdir}/HTML/??/%{name} ? On my system, the only rpm which uses %{_docdir}/HTML/ is fedora-release-notes. Documents in other rpms should be in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}. I suggest moving HTML document files. * rpmlint is not silent. E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/drawwidget.h E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/maindialog.h E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/drawwidget.cpp E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/maindlg.ui.h E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/matdata.cpp E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/curvedialog.h E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/main.cpp E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/curvedialog.cpp E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/matdata.h E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/maindialog.cpp E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/curvedlg.ui.h --- permission issue. Fix this by changing the permissions of these files to 644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:53:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231853.k7NIrCim027212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-23 14:43 EST ------- Chitlesh, I'd suggest opening a new report (so that you are properly marked as Reporter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231853.k7NIrcdS027307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-23 14:43 EST ------- Good guess! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:54:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231854.k7NIsiXn027439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-23 14:45 EST ------- Ok :) I'm closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:56:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203789] New: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown-0.8.2-4.src.rpm Description: KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 18:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231858.k7NIwpcK027791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 ------- Additional Comments From mej at eterm.org 2006-08-23 14:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Ideally yes, but rpm doesn't do this by default so it has to be done in each > package. One, RPM *does* do this by default now. Two, RPM is a package manager, not a build system. You'll note I said "build system." > Even if rpm was changed to do this automatically, packages desiring > compatibility with older distributions would still need to clean the buildroot > themselves. Not if you're using a sane build system, like Mezzanine, which handles all that for you like a good build system should. For what it's worth, there's now a LICENSE file in LibAST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 19:01:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231901.k7NJ1rg5027992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-23 14:52 EST ------- What's the status of this submission? It'd be great to have kdebluetooth included soon. Comment 13 does not seem to be addressed yet. I'm unable to use SELinux in enforcing mode for various reasons at the moment and I don't have a Rawhide setup available to test with its policy, so in case nobody takes over review responsibility of this package from me (everyone's welcome!), I'm afraid it'll take until some time after FC6 release until I can promise to continue the review. It's not entirely impossible earlier though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 19:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231905.k7NJ5WDU028248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-23 14:55 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 203789 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 19:05:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203789] Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231905.k7NJ5tWO028295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kushaldas at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-23 14:56 EST ------- *** Bug 186817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 19:07:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231907.k7NJ7SdQ028381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 mej at eterm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mej at eterm.org ------- Additional Comments From mej at eterm.org 2006-08-23 14:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi Terje, I think the rpath error is a blocker (can anyone else comment > here?) That is one of the "stupid policies" I mentioned in the other bug. There is nothing inherently wrong with rpath, and blindly rejecting packages because of it is ridiculous. Particularly since the paths Eterm uses are NOT WRITEABLE. The "fix" (I use the term loosely) is to edit Makefile.am to remove the -rpath parameter. > Please try to get the license issues sorted out *within* the upstream > source since they are a blocker. If the upstream maintainers clarify > things (say, if they put a single COPYING or LICENSE file that makes it > clear what the overall terms with--with *no* inconsistencies in the > individual files), that would be ideal. Eterm 0.9.4, which has just been released, has the appropriate LICENSE file to clarify the situation. (In reply to comment #4) > I sent a mail to Michael some time ago, however no feedback yet. Had I *actually* been contacted about this, I would've taken action sooner. As it is, no one who has posted on this bug contacted me about it, nor did the Debian maintainer or any debian developer. It wasn't until a USER named Nolius dropped me an e-mail with a link to the eterm package news page that I heard of this issue. Shame on you both. (In reply to comment #8) > Its a shame that upstream could not or would not sort out the licenses. I did, and I would've done it sooner had either of you e-mailed me directly about it. I was e-mailed about the other bug, WRT LibAST, but not Eterm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 19:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203789] Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608231943.k7NJhW8m031268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-23 15:33 EST ------- Duplicate, to mark myself as the reporter :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 20:18:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232018.k7NKIGjA001258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-23 16:08 EST ------- Rpmlint complains, chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/kdeedu-3.5.4-1.i386.rpm E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/blinken.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/blinken.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kalzium.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kalzium.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kanagram.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kanagram.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kbruch.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kbruch.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/keduca.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/keduca.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kgeography.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kgeography.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/khangman.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/khangman.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kiten.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kiten.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/klatin.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/klatin.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/klettres.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/klettres.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kmplot.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kmplot.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kstars.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kstars.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/ktouch.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/ktouch.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kturtle.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kturtle.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kverbos.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kverbos.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kvoctrain.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kvoctrain.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kwordquiz.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kwordquiz.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/languagesettings.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/languagesettings.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/presettings.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/presettings.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/khangmanrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/khangmanrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/klettresrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/klettresrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kstarsrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kstarsrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kvoctrainrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kvoctrainrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kwordquizrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kwordquizrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/magic/cabri.magic W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/magic/cabri.magic E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/magic/drgeo.magic W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/magic/drgeo.magic W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kvoctrain/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klettres/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmplot/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kstars/common ../common W: kdeedu hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/Edutainment/Mathematics/.directory W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kbruch/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kig/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kanagram/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kwordquiz/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kiten/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kalzium/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kgeography/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kverbos/common ../common W: kdeedu hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/Edutainment/Tools/.directory W: kdeedu hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/Edutainment/Miscellaneous/.directory W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/keduca/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klatin/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpercentage/common ../common W: kdeedu hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/Edutainment/Languages/.directory W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/khangman/common ../common W: kdeedu hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/Edutainment/Science/.directory W: kdeedu non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/pykig.pyo 0644 W: kdeedu non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/pykig.pyc 0644 W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kturtle/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/blinken/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/common ../common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 21:11:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232111.k7NLBVwx005755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-23 17:01 EST ------- Quick notes... Release: 1 - needs the dist License: IBM Public License - is this a valid licence Fedora is happy with? %prep %{__libtoolize} --force %{__aclocal} %{__autoconf} %{__autoheader} %{__automake} -a Is this lot really needed or can the relibtoolize thing work? --with-jni-path=%{java_home}/include \ You need something in the BR if java is going to be used You have %{_libdir}/%{name}/ in files and %{_libdir}/%{name}/samples in samples. As the files has already taken ownership of %{_libdir}/%{name}, does the second one need to be in there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 21:17:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232117.k7NLHI4t006286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-23 17:07 EST ------- dist - ACK, will fix License is OSI-approved: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ibmpl.php %prep - I prefer to spell them out, autoreconf never worked for me java support is in todo it doesn't build currently, hence commented out BuildRequires: java-devel I have %exclude %{_libdir}/dx/samples in main and %{_libdir}/dx/samples in -samples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 21:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203825] New: yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203825 Summary: yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: kevin.benton at amd.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: When attempting to install gdl as a part of the listed packages for pirut, it depends on ImageMagic - a package that doesn't exist. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: See description Steps to Reproduce: 1. See description 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 22:10:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232210.k7NMANc3012663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597 ghenry at suretecsystems.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghenry at suretecsystems.com ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2006-08-23 18:00 EST ------- Hi, What is the status of this package? Thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 22:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232218.k7NMI92e013107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ghenry at suretecsystems.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghenry at suretecsystems.com ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2006-08-23 18:08 EST ------- Any news from Digium yet? Thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 22:18:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232218.k7NMIpt4013181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2006-08-23 18:09 EST ------- Hi, What is the status of this package? Thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 22:57:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232257.k7NMvERg015108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 23:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232313.k7NND3cu015656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-23 19:03 EST ------- In response to comment #22: I think it's waiting to hear the fate of the zaptel-kmod submission. Once thats decided we can close or move this one forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 23:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232318.k7NNIOOA015827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-08-23 19:08 EST ------- Yup. There was a new release of cairomm that was just pushed into FC6 with a stable API and a few minor changes. In particular Cairo::clear_path() became Cairo::begin_new_path() so I was waiting to do the builds until I could have FC6 and FC5 at the same time. I just got FC6 on my laptop last night, so I'm hoping to do some final tests tonight or tomorrow night. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 23 23:57:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608232357.k7NNvkan017079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-23 19:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > > What is the status of this package? It's in a bit of limbo... There's not much point to getting spandsp in Extras unless Asterisk makes it in, and there's not much point for Asterisk in Fedora Extras without the Zaptel kernel modules (you lose a lot of important/interesting functionality in Asterisk without Zaptel). The Zaptel modules are being held up due to disagreements about how to package them properly (or even if they should be packaged at all). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 00:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240003.k7O039xG017327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-23 19:53 EST ------- I agree about the debuginfo package, and it's OK if it's not really possible to make it complete, but I don't know what to do about the dangling symlinks. You can't just delete them from the source directory as that would break short-circuit builds. I wanted to build the package with your changes but the src.rpm link is no longer valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 00:59:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240059.k7O0x1vr019015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-23 20:49 EST ------- It seems to me that you still / again need a sponsor since your other package is (going to be) in Fedora Core instead of Extras and I do not find your e-mail address in the list of cvsextras members. This means you need to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the "blocks" input field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 01:06:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240106.k7O16l6u019392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-23 20:57 EST ------- Tasaka thanks for you review and test. This is mistake for patch5, but now I think patch5 is not necessary, so I remove it. Both Howarth's and Tasaka's suggestion are very good. So I think set fc5/fc6 to default in spec is more appropriate, I will keep in mind. The new files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-10.src.rpm I use mock build for fc6/fc5 are cleanly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 02:17:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240217.k7O2Hcxs022122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-23 22:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134765) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134765&action=view) gcin.spec-10.patch If the package is only for fc5 and later, then I think it is better to just simplify it like this. (There is no problem to use gcin.conf on fc4 and earlier afaics.) As I tried to say in comment 40, I will sponsor Chung-Yen Chang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 02:33:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240233.k7O2XJ0e022806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-23 22:23 EST ------- Hi, Petersen, I try to merge it to spec file (for fc3 fc4 fc5 fc6 and rhel4). But, after all, I think it is better to simplify it like your patch. So maybe it is better form me to seperate the spec file for "fc5 and later" and "fc4 and earlier and rhel4". And another question, I know use gcon.conf on fc4 and earlier is no problem, but I think it is better for use gcin then gcin.conf on fc4 and earlier. (It look a little stranger if use gcin.conf) [candyz:~] im-switch -z zh_TW -l xinput-zh_TW - status is manual. link currently points to gcin scim - priority 81 oxim - priority 30 gcin.conf - priority 40 Current `best' version is scim. ======================================================= The following languages currently have input methods configured: as_IN bn_IN en_US gu_IN hi_IN ja_JP kn_IN ko_KR ml_IN ne_NE or_IN pa_IN si_LK ta_IN te_IN th_TH vi_VN zh_CN zh_HK zh_SG zh_TW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 03:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240314.k7O3ExqD024924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134765|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-23 23:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134766) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134766&action=view) gcin.spec-10.1.patch Okay, you're right - I was being too hasty. Here is a better patch, which should handle %fedora correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 03:26:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240326.k7O3QDQx025441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134765|1 |0 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 03:26:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240326.k7O3QZUx025486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134765|1 |0 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-23 23:16 EST ------- I merge the gcin.spec-10.1.patch New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-11.src.rpm Petersen, thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 03:27:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240327.k7O3RBms025526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-23 23:17 EST ------- Whoops, forgot to close this out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 03:29:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240329.k7O3Ta2b025675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-23 23:19 EST ------- But sorry, the last patch still doesn't help when %fedora is not defined. So yes, it is probably easiest just to branch the spec file for fc5 as I originally thought too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 03:58:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240358.k7O3wotr027403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-23 23:48 EST ------- Now I branch the spec file. New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-12.src.rpm Spec for fc4 and earlier URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec-branch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 04:15:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] New: Review Request: tripwire - IDS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire-2.4.0.1-1.fc6.2.src.rpm Description: tripwire has been orphaned for some time now, and neglected upstream for almost as long. I talked with Warren a while back about taking over and have finally decided to do so. However, upstream is still active on their forums and has been promising the next release since March. Nonetheless, I have contacted upstream in hopes of spurring some activity, and hopefully a new release that is gcc4-compatible out of the box, but no replies as of yet. This SRPM builds and runs on my FC5 i386 (has been running for the last 3 days without incident) as well as builds in mock FC6 i386, but I don't have access to x86_64 hardware to test builds. The spec file _does_ specify ExclusiveArch ix86, but that is leftover from 2.3.0 and some posts in the forums vaguely indicate that 2.4.0 builds and runs fine on 64bit hardware. I'd appreciate anybody willing to remove the ExclusiveArch and test building/executing on an x86_64 machine. It looks ugly while it's building, throws LOTS of warnings, 95% of which are complaining about non-virtual dtor's. I brought this up in my letter to upstream, but the binaries seem to run fine despite being narrowly compilable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 04:18:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240418.k7O4ID8O028714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-24 00:08 EST ------- srpm looks good to me and gcin.spec-branch. (I think you forgot to update gcin.spec.:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 04:21:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240421.k7O4LJvj028965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-08-24 00:11 EST ------- I also requested access to his SVN repository (he houses the code outside of sourceforge), or if there's even anything in there worth having, so we could possibly pacakge newer SVN code without an official release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 04:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240423.k7O4NkCF029154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2006-08-24 00:13 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot to update gcin.spec. Now the gcin.spec updated. :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 04:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240456.k7O4uaPJ031054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(robert at marcanoonli| |ne.com) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-24 00:46 EST ------- Things look very good and I will work up a full review tomorrow, but I wanted to comment on one thing: > All eclipse related RPMs package dependencies as absolute links, i just did the > same. Given the state of many core packages, unless you can point to an Extras-style review then pointing to what an existing package does is not generally a valid argument. Still, in this case I asked around and the issue of the symlink-should-be-relative warning is not clear cut. The main reason for the warning is the fact that absolute symlinks get in the way of proper operation with chroots (since the links will point to different files depending on whether you've chrooted or not). Symlinks can have this problem too if they contain excessive ".." components, but hopefully that would be caught in a review. So I tend to believe that it would be better to use relative symlinks, but it's not really essential for a desktop application and in this case the rest of eclipse is bound to have the same issue. I won't block on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 05:16:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240516.k7O5GJu3031629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-24 01:06 EST ------- Well, srpm and spec seems well for me. too. (I only tested for http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 05:53:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240553.k7O5rIFS000530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-24 01:43 EST ------- Well, as far as I check this rpm very quickly, the packaging issue is almost okay. # rpmlint is clean. # mock build okay. * Source: http://xcircuit.ece.jhu.edu/... They say that http://xcircuit.ece.jhu.edu/ is obsolete, and I can find this source on: http://opencircuitdesign.com/xcircuit/archive/xcircuit-3.4.26.tgz . * %patch0 -p0 -b . For kindness, please add some suffix. * %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then Require %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache on post and postun. * The included file /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 is necessary? * I don't know well how to use this, however, when I launch this by just typing "xcircuit &", then I see the following error message: loading history file ... 1 events added error in slave eval: image type "xpm" doesn't exist Main console display active (Tcl8.4.13 / Tk8.4.13) Is this okay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 06:19:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240619.k7O6Jch9001724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-24 02:09 EST ------- The release tag is off by a little bit, the %{?dist} tag should always be at the end of the tag unless it's a sub-release bump. 0.2%{?dist}.%{rcrel} -> 0.2.%{rcrel}%{?dist} According to Packaging/PHP, the package should also "Requires: php". The latest version is 1.3.0 GA, but RC6 is being packaged. To be fair, GA was released the day after I assigned the review to myself, but... :) Please update the package to 1.3.0. For the rpmlint warnings, the second is spurious and can be ignored. The first, however, could be fixed, but it appears part of the pear install process is to check the md5sums of each file. If the line ending can be fixed w/o too much pain and mucking around with the pear-based install process, I'd like to see it addressed. You have php.ini both listed as source1, and created in %prep. One or the other works nicely, but both is redundant. (Especially given nothing is ever done with %{SOURCE0}...) Also, while using php.ini to override the default memory and execution limits works during the rpm build, the install fails on %post with the defaults on the system: [root at zeus mock]# rpm -ivh php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0-0.2.fc5.RC6.noarch.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:php-pear-PhpDocumentor ########################################### [100%] PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 229 bytes) in /usr/share/pear/PEAR/Installer.php on line 283 Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 72 bytes) Installing the created php.ini as an additional .ini file in /etc/php.d enables the install to suceed, e.g. in %install: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/php.d cp -p php.ini $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/php.d/phpDocumentor.ini I don't get a good feeling from overriding core php.ini values in a package's own modular ini file, but there doesn't seem to be another clean way to do this. (ideas/comments from those reading are solicited :) ) Perhaps it would be a good idea to open a bug asking for the core memory limits be updated? The response at least from the php maintainer would be valuable. There's nearly a meg of tutorials and examples, which is great, but that's a bit large to not be put in a -docs subpackage. SO, to recap: * release tag * check on fixing rpmlint warning * update version * decide how php.ini is going to be included in srpm * deal with memory limits (a la a /etc/php.d/foo.ini file), open bug * split %_docdir/Documentation and %_docdir/tutorials off into a -docs package X package meets naming and packaging guidelines. (release tag) + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is present (but in the wrong place) + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible (LGPL). License text included in package. + source files match upstream: e6f31c313b0b06c09acaf7047e6a5b23 PhpDocumentor-1.3.0RC6.tgz e6f31c313b0b06c09acaf7047e6a5b23 PhpDocumentor-1.3.0RC6.tgz.srpm X latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. X package has required requires/provides statements. + package builds in mock (devel/x86_64). O rpmlint is silent. (see below) O final provides and requires are sane (except as noted above): ** phpdoc-1.3.0-0.2.fc5.RC6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides phpdoc = 1.3.0-0.2.fc5.RC6 == requires /usr/bin/php php-cli >= 5 php-pear(PhpDocumentor) = 1.3.0 ** php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0-0.2.fc5.RC6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint W: php-pear-PhpDocumentor wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0/Documentation/Release-old/Release-0.3.0 W: php-pear-PhpDocumentor dangerous-command-in-%post install == provides php-pear(PhpDocumentor) = 1.3.0 php-pear-PhpDocumentor = 1.3.0-0.2.fc5.RC6 == requires /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.4.9 + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. O %check is not present; no automated test suite + sane scriptlets present. + code, not content. X documentation is large (~876k), so -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 06:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240622.k7O6MXmv001824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-24 02:12 EST ------- Package is APPROVED. When you are ready please follow the instructions carefully to import into extras cvs. Thanks for contributing gcin to Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 08:08:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240808.k7O8862M008000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-24 03:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > > Well, it should be just a warning to them that something will happen here if > they do not act upon. I will try to get some more info and let you know For those interested, discussion going on here: http://www.motifzone.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3883 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 08:11:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240811.k7O8BQrq008235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-24 04:01 EST ------- 0.7.4 is out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 09:29:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608240929.k7O9TXsi013422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-24 05:19 EST ------- Erm, never mind I spoke too soon, I'll start a review on kdiff soonish (I just started a new job) and then I'll hear 2 others which you would like to get reviewed for the sponsor process from you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 10:32:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241032.k7OAWnG9018280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 fedora at soeterbroek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at soeterbroek.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-08-24 06:23 EST ------- Only 1 rpmline error: $ rpmlint tripwire-2.4.0.1-1.fc6.2.i386.rpm E: tripwire executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/tripwire-check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 10:49:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241049.k7OAn4jY019340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 06:39 EST ------- Built successfully for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 11:23:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203825] yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241123.k7OBNa4F021152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203825 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Component|Package Review |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-24 07:13 EST ------- This works for me: # yum install gdl Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories updates [1/3] core [2/3] extras [3/3] Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package gdl.i386 0:0.8.11-4.fc5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libplplotcxxd.so.9 for package: gdl --> Processing Dependency: libMagick++.so.9 for package: gdl --> Processing Dependency: libplplotd.so.9 for package: gdl --> Processing Dependency: libgslcblas.so.0 for package: gdl --> Processing Dependency: libfftw3.so.3 for package: gdl --> Processing Dependency: libgsl.so.0 for package: gdl --> Processing Dependency: libhdf5.so.0 for package: gdl --> Processing Dependency: libfftw3f.so.3 for package: gdl --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package ImageMagick-c++.i386 0:6.2.5.4-4.2.1.fc5.4 set to be updated ---> Package fftw.i386 0:3.1.1-1.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package gsl.i386 0:1.7-1.2.1 set to be updated ---> Package hdf5.i386 0:1.6.5-5.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package plplot.i386 0:5.6.1-2.fc5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libqhull.so.5 for package: plplot --> Processing Dependency: libWand.so.9 for package: ImageMagick-c++ --> Processing Dependency: libgfortran.so.1 for package: plplot --> Processing Dependency: libMagick.so.9 for package: ImageMagick-c++ --> Processing Dependency: ImageMagick = 6.2.5.4-4.2.1.fc5.4 for package: ImageMagick-c++ --> Processing Dependency: libLASi.so.0 for package: plplot --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package qhull.i386 0:2003.1-5.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package libgfortran.i386 0:4.1.1-1.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package ImageMagick.i386 0:6.2.5.4-4.2.1.fc5.4 set to be updated ---> Package lasi.i386 0:1.0.5-2.fc5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libwmflite-0.2.so.7 for package: ImageMagick --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package libwmf.i386 0:0.2.8.4-5.2 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: gdl i386 0.8.11-4.fc5 extras 2.0 M Installing for dependencies: ImageMagick i386 6.2.5.4-4.2.1.fc5.4 updates 3.1 M ImageMagick-c++ i386 6.2.5.4-4.2.1.fc5.4 updates 143 k fftw i386 3.1.1-1.fc5 extras 890 k gsl i386 1.7-1.2.1 core 742 k hdf5 i386 1.6.5-5.fc5 extras 2.6 M lasi i386 1.0.5-2.fc5 extras 36 k libgfortran i386 4.1.1-1.fc5 updates 194 k libwmf i386 0.2.8.4-5.2 updates 821 k plplot i386 5.6.1-2.fc5 extras 2.9 M qhull i386 2003.1-5.fc5 extras 382 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 11 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 14 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Exiting on user Command Complete! If you are still having problems, please provide the output of "yum install gdl" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 11:25:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203825] yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241125.k7OBPEIo021263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203825 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |gdl CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 11:30:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241130.k7OBUKHc021584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 colding at omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |evolution-brutus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 11:58:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173249] Review Request: Music Player Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241158.k7OBwv1D023146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Music Player Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173249 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidf at sjsoft.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 14:14:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241414.k7OEEAI4031657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 candyz0416 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 15:21:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241521.k7OFLvHs004633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-08-24 11:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134825) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134825&action=view) poor font rendering example -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 15:24:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241524.k7OFOJOg004961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-08-24 11:14 EST ------- I'm getting poor font rendering in slab. See previous attachment. Under FC5. It's not the standard font but Maiandra GD. I don't see the poor font rendering anywhere else on my desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 15:28:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241528.k7OFSTuh005378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-08-24 11:18 EST ------- Sorry to spam but I guess it could be just bad looking bolding? Or non standard bolding? I just tried bolding some text in an html email in evolution with the same font and it looked fine even at different sizes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 15:29:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241529.k7OFT4c1005442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 alriddoch at zepler.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alriddoch at zepler.org ------- Additional Comments From alriddoch at zepler.org 2006-08-24 11:19 EST ------- Sorry about the clash. This is the first and only package I have distributed which is not under the GPL, so I screwed up. The wording was intended to be GPL compatable, but still allow essentially unrestricted commercial use. I will re-word the copyright statement in the code, and release a new version without any reference to the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 15:35:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241535.k7OFZSAo006056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From alriddoch at zepler.org 2006-08-24 11:25 EST ------- IPv6 should be supported via skstream which I also maintain. I tested using IPv6 with cyphesis at the time I did the development work on skstream. I have not had much chance to test since, but as I work at a site with native IPv6 on the whole network, it is likely my test machines use IPv6 by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 16:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241603.k7OG3882008443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From alriddoch at zepler.org 2006-08-24 11:53 EST ------- After re-reading the thread, I am no longer exactly clear what is wrong with clause 2. Can someone suggest a minimal wording for requiring that source changes are marked as such, while keeping compatable with the wordier requirements in the GPL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241703.k7OH39O4012197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-08-24 12:53 EST ------- Couple of quick items: 1. Source should be full URL. 2. Package fails to build in Mock. I'll attach the build log for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:03:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241703.k7OH3bp0012234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-08-24 12:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134832) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134832&action=view) Mock Build Log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:14:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241714.k7OHEkPS013059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-08-24 13:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134834) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134834&action=view) mail from upstream Here is the answer from Peter Sestoft. Since I don't have access to x86_64, could you look at the points raised? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:19:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241719.k7OHJ7cx013419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-08-24 13:09 EST ------- Looking at the .spec alone reveals several orphaned/unincluded directories: %{_libdir}/%{name}/ %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/ # -devel %{_includedir}/%{name}/ # -tk %{_libdir}/%{name}/tcl/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:23:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241723.k7OHNFEI013809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:24:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241724.k7OHOLUL013931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 uosiumen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |uosiumen at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From uosiumen at gmail.com 2006-08-24 13:14 EST ------- Hi I would like to ask about progress of work with this package, I have a hope that it'll be ready to include it into FC6 to extras repository additionally I want to report a bug in XGL I have problem with XGL in KDE with compiz installed with this tutorial: http://illawarra.org/linux/index.php?id=howto The problem is Polish letters- shortcuts for XGL are - Left Shif - Left Ctrl - Left Alt, but right alt is locked too, so I can't write polish characters. my Xorg.conf is [uosiu at uosiumen ~]$ pastebin /etc/X11/xorg.conf http://en.pastebin.ca/147785 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:24:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241724.k7OHODIX013917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:32:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241732.k7OHWvt6014582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-24 13:23 EST ------- Alacarte has been built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:33:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203019] Review Request: pyxdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241733.k7OHXbgs014638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-24 13:23 EST ------- This is not going to go into Core, alacarte no longer uses it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:34:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203022] Review Request: alacarte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241734.k7OHYAnl014704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alacarte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203022 Bug 203022 depends on bug 203019, which changed state. Bug 203019 Summary: Review Request: pyxdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203019 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 17:55:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241755.k7OHtNQ7016983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-24 13:45 EST ------- This is closed for now. They've gone into core, but a new bug could be opened to ask for their move to Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 18:34:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241834.k7OIYZAt020905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-24 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, as far as I check this rpm very quickly, > the packaging issue is almost okay. > > # rpmlint is clean. > # mock build okay. > > * Source: http://xcircuit.ece.jhu.edu/... > They say that http://xcircuit.ece.jhu.edu/ is obsolete, and I can > find this source on: > http://opencircuitdesign.com/xcircuit/archive/xcircuit-3.4.26.tgz . > > * %patch0 -p0 -b . > For kindness, please add some suffix. > > * %post > if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then > Require %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache on post and postun. Corrected. > * The included file /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 is > necessary? Manual :) > * I don't know well how to use this, however, when I launch this > by just typing "xcircuit &", then I see the following error > message: > > loading history file ... 1 events added > error in slave eval: > image type "xpm" doesn't exist > Main console display active (Tcl8.4.13 / Tk8.4.13) > > Is this okay? > Actually, I was unable to recreate this on my FC5. Check again with the updated srpm. Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 18:45:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241845.k7OIjKPx022056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-24 14:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134843) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134843&action=view) Updated spec file We're trying to base our audio packages off othe PlanetCCRMA packages, but PlanetCCRMA's Csound is a fair bit older than this one. I'm attaching an updated spec file, but it still isn't perfect. It adds support for java, jack, OSC, DSSI and the Csound GUI. Please include incorporate these changes. I think we should also have a -tutorial subpackage, and solve the missing manual problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 18:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] New: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libburn/libburn.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libburn/libburn-0.2-1.20060823svn.src.rpm Description: Libburn is an open-source library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs. For now this means only CD-R and CD-RW. The project comprises of several more or less interdependent parts which together strive to be a usable foundation for application development. These are libraries, language bindings, and middleware binaries which emulate classical (and valuable) Linux tools. rpmlint warns about no docs and mixed use of spaces and tabs. Those could be ignored IMHO. rpmlint also errors about shellbang stuff in the debuginfo package and I think thats because the upstream files have execute permissions on them or some such. I think I can fix that in my svn checkout, and will need to make sure that the upstream released tarballs have correct perms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 19:02:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241902.k7OJ2BBs024002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-08-24 14:52 EST ------- I managed to build in mock on fedora-development-i386-core flawlessly without the problem you had. So this seems very much related to x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 19:15:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608241915.k7OJFT0u025288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-24 15:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=134843) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134843&action=view) [edit] > Updated spec file > > We're trying to base our audio packages off othe PlanetCCRMA packages, but > PlanetCCRMA's Csound is a fair bit older than this one. > > I'm attaching an updated spec file, but it still isn't perfect. It adds > support for java, jack, OSC, DSSI and the Csound GUI. Please include > incorporate these changes. > > I think we should also have a -tutorial subpackage, and solve the missing > manual problem. > I'll incorporate your patch. BTW, do you know if enabling Jack makes it required at runtime, or is csound smart enough to not use it? I don't think OLPC won't have Jack and we don't want to fork... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:00:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242000.k7OK0fvR028930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-24 15:50 EST ------- Herm, proper url: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libburn/libburn-0.2-1.20060823svn.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:05:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242005.k7OK5nss029284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 15:56 EST ------- I guess to avoid rpmlint symlink errors/warnings you can change ln -s %{_bindir}/jack-dssi-host $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/fluidsynth-dssi to cd %{_bindir} ln -s jack-dssi-host fluidsynth-dssi cd - because there is no need to make the symlinks across the filesystem if source and target are in the same directory. This concerns also your other dssi plugin(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242009.k7OK9k0W029608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 16:00 EST ------- The specfile uses "make" instead of "make %{?_smp_mflags}" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:25:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193784] Review Request: linuxdcpp - A port of DC++ to Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242025.k7OKPAY4030628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - A port of DC++ to Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193784 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 16:15 EST ------- "%lang(ru) %doc README.lang.ru" should not work as expected, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-August/msg00071.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:29:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242029.k7OKT6H3030928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 16:19 EST ------- Cannot access specfile: $ curl -I http://beta.glwb.info/gresistor/gresistor.spec curl: (7) couldn't connect to host -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:30:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242030.k7OKUK02031019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-24 16:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I'll incorporate your patch. BTW, do you know if enabling Jack makes it > required at runtime, or is csound smart enough to not use it? I don't think > OLPC won't have Jack and we don't want to fork... Try packaging %{_libdir}/csound/plugins/librtjack.so into a subpackage. The same may work for the libdssi4cs.so and libosc.so if you want to make it really modular. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:50:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242050.k7OKo68c032376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-24 16:40 EST ------- I'm a tad concerned that it's redefining printf for some reason in a HELL of a lot of files. It seems to be coming from h/csoundCore.h line 119 rpmlint warnings. src.rpm is clean csound-5.03.0-2 : W: csound no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so (should this not be in the -devel package? csound-devel : W: csound-devel no-docs (can be ignored) csound-python: W: dangling-symlink %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/_csnd.so %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so csound-python: W: symlink-should-be-relative %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/_csnd.so %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so csound-java: W: no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_jsound.so W: no-docs W: symlink-should-be-relative %{_datadir}/java/csnd.jar %{_libdir}/csound/java/csnd.jar csound-tk: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: no docs csound-debuginfo: clean For the missing .so files, these really should be in the csound-devel package (and java-devel package). The tk Error must be attended to. Your specfile is also missing Requires(post and postun): /sbin/ldconfig Does the package not come with other vocabulary languages? If this is for the OLPC programme, then it makes sense for translations to be in there! In %files... The %{_bindir} entries can be globbed to make things easier to read (or better still, a simple for loop on the package names. In %files devel %{_includedir}/%{name}/* Need to be changed to %{includedir}/%{name}/ to take ownership of the directory and files In %files tk I'm not sure about the .tk files in %{_libdir}. Is this the correct place for them? csound is currently building in mock - I'll report back when it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 20:53:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242053.k7OKrLiT032687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-24 16:43 EST ------- http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor.spec http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor-0.0.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:05:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190344] Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242105.k7OL5NdQ001333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 16:55 EST ------- The URL to the spec file is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190346] Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242109.k7OL9CaA001471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190346 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 16:59 EST ------- The URL to the spec file is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242112.k7OLCSBq001772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 17:02 EST ------- The URL to the spec file is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:27:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242127.k7OLRXBj003247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwilson at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:30:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242130.k7OLU8GW003475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-24 17:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm a tad concerned that it's redefining printf for some reason in a HELL of a > lot of files. It seems to be coming from h/csoundCore.h line 119 I asked about that, upstream is now aware that we dislike it :) It was added to make sure that all plugins use the Csound logging facilities. I think it may go away in the near future, and we can likely remove it if we wish. > > rpmlint warnings. > > src.rpm is clean > > csound-5.03.0-2 : W: csound no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so (should this not be > in the -devel package? No, it's the python module code, and it should be in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/. I'll move it. > csound-devel : W: csound-devel no-docs (can be ignored) > > csound-python: W: dangling-symlink %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/_csnd.so > %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so > csound-python: W: symlink-should-be-relative > %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/_csnd.so %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so Will be fixed when that lib moves to python's site-packages. > csound-java: W: no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_jsound.so > W: no-docs > W: symlink-should-be-relative %{_datadir}/java/csnd.jar > %{_libdir}/csound/java/csnd.jar This one shouldn't be a symlink either, should probably move csnd.jar to %{_datadir} too. > csound-tk: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > W: no docs > > csound-debuginfo: clean > > For the missing .so files, these really should be in the csound-devel package > (and java-devel package). The tk Error must be attended to. Except that most aren't devel libs; they are the java and python module libraries and should live in those packages, not in the main csound packages. > > Your specfile is also missing Requires(post and postun): /sbin/ldconfig Will add. > Does the package not come with other vocabulary languages? If this is for the > OLPC programme, then it makes sense for translations to be in there! I don't think so... I couldn't see a switch for it at build-time, but I'll ask. > In %files... > > The %{_bindir} entries can be globbed to make things easier to read (or better > still, a simple for loop on the package names. Can that be done even if some stuff from %{_bindir} is owned by a sub-package? > In %files devel > %{_includedir}/%{name}/* Need to be changed to %{includedir}/%{name}/ to take > ownership of the directory and files Will do. > In %files tk > > I'm not sure about the .tk files in %{_libdir}. Is this the correct place for them? Yeah, that's odd. I'm not sure. > csound is currently building in mock - I'll report back when it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:31:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242131.k7OLVIHB003556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-24 17:21 EST ------- mock fails - you need to add BR libpng-devel (failed building the GUI) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:31:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242131.k7OLVLIS003570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |203993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:33:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242133.k7OLXoK5003692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-24 17:23 EST ------- 8---> > In %files... > > The %{_bindir} entries can be globbed to make things easier to read (or better > still, a simple for loop on the package names. Can that be done even if some stuff from %{_bindir} is owned by a sub-package? <---8 I know I've done it in other packages - but only where the main package has owned the root directory. Remember, you can always use %dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:34:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242134.k7OLYFkc003756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-24 17:24 EST ------- I have filled Bug #203993 against openmotif to have parallel installable openmotif and lesstif, and set it to block that bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:47:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242147.k7OLlZOw005086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-24 17:37 EST ------- I am not convinced that this package is interesting enough. I have posted a spec file anyway: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/Wcl.spec Are you really interested in that package being in extras? Xbae depends on it, but only to build an example, so maybe it should better be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:51:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242151.k7OLpaq3005275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-24 17:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > csound-java: W: no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_jsound.so I think this is ignoreable, as lib_jcsound.so is only ever ldopened (btw, what happened to the 'c' in lib_jcsound.so? cut-n-paste error?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:56:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242156.k7OLu4gc005605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-24 17:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > W: symlink-should-be-relative %{_datadir}/java/csnd.jar > > %{_libdir}/csound/java/csnd.jar > > This one shouldn't be a symlink either, should probably move csnd.jar to > %{_datadir} too. I think we should keep this as a symlink (although I suppose it can be relative). Upstream wants it in %{_libdir}/csound/java, but our fedora standard is to place .jar files in %{_javadir} (== %{_datadir}/java). We should leave it in both places to satisfy both our requirement and any upstream packages that expect to find it in csound's %{_libdir}/csound/java directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 21:59:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242159.k7OLxlkJ005836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 dcbw at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134843|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-24 17:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134864) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134864&action=view) Specfile v3 Splits out the jack, dssi, and osc bits. We want this _really_ modular so OLPC can use it. Also incorporates cleanup suggestions from above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 22:02:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242202.k7OM2iuG006219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-24 17:53 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-1.4.1-11.src.rpm * Mon Aug 21 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-11 - Set device permissions in both console.perms and udev (#202132). - Sync restart and DVB module reload functionality with upstream runvdr. * Fri Aug 18 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-10 - Fix build with recent kernel headers where _syscallX are no longer visible. - Drop ia64 patch (superseded by the above) and the thread poison patch. * Fri Aug 11 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.1-9 - Set device permissions using console.perms instead of udev rules to work around new pam trumping udev config (#202132). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 22:03:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190344] Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242203.k7OM3nX6006385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-24 17:54 EST ------- And intentionally so. Dealing with lots of packages and having multiple versions of specfiles of some floating around is a scenario I'm guaranteed to screw up every now and then. And because the specfile is only a part of a submission and the whole SRPM contents need to be reviewed anyway, I prefer to not upload specfiles separately -- doing so and uploading just the SRPM is IMO more efficient use of everyone's time. If this is a blocker for your review of this package, let me know and I'll upload the spec somewhere. Note however that the parent vdr package (bug 190343) needs to be reviewed first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 22:05:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190346] Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242205.k7OM5l7l006523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190346 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-24 17:56 EST ------- See bug 190344 comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 22:21:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242221.k7OMLdvq007250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 18:11 EST ------- I just looked into old review requests to push them forward, so go ahead and close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 22:30:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242230.k7OMUHrQ007687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-24 18:20 EST ------- A couple of vulnerabilities reported against 1.2.10: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-4345 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-4346 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 22:34:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190344] Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242234.k7OMYAq9007980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-24 18:24 EST ------- I do not know about other reviewers but I like to take a look into the spec file before I decide whether or not to spend more time with a review request. When the URL is provided it only takes the browser to look into it which is a lot less work than to download the srpm, extract it and look into the spec file. Besides I am yet very unexperienced and this way I can easily decide whether or not the spec file is too complicated for me now. As well the first impression of the spec file helps me to anticipate how much work the review will be and how long a mock test build will take. For this reasons maybe you get someone to review your package faster if you provide a separate spec file but it won't be a blocker for me. If I find some time I will look into your srpm and review it as soon as I am in fedorabugs and I feel capable of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 23:43:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242343.k7ONhnb5010968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-24 19:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134870) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134870&action=view) Update spec file (v3++) This version adds -javadoc and -tutorial subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 24 23:54:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608242354.k7ONsYpw011269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-24 19:44 EST ------- I've talked to Raphael Slinckx on IRC and he agrees that python-sexy should be under LGPL. I've mailed Christian Hammond in order to update the license file on svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 00:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250023.k7P0NZSD012239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-24 20:13 EST ------- BYI, this also builds fine on x86_64. The compiler warnings are almost exclusively "warning: 'class blah' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor." I don't see anything about incompatible sizes or the like. No %check, though, and I'm not sure how I'd go about doing a quick test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 01:25:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250125.k7P1PHw9014564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-24 21:15 EST ------- Excellent. Thats the last blocker I saw, so this package is APPROVED. Remember to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once it's imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 02:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250215.k7P2FVJv016748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 dcbw at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134864|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #134870|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-24 22:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134885) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134885&action=view) spec v4 Incorporate v3++ changes and revert change that moved the jarfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 04:45:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250445.k7P4jihs025965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-25 00:35 EST ------- I just realized that the gcj related stuff in %post and %postun need to move to %post and %postun for the -java subpackage. My bad. Sorry about that! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 05:00:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250500.k7P50Tnr026347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-25 00:50 EST ------- I had to chase dependencies a bit to make sure that %libdir/gjc is properly owned, but I'm pretty sure it is. I wish there was a handy recursive dependency chaser. * source files match upstream. (No checksums possible; see above. Comparison using diff shows the source to be identical.) * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate (as far as I can tell for Java) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete (no source, but there are debug symbols). * rpmlint complaints are acceptable. * final provides and requires are sane: eclipse-subclipse-1.1.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.ui_1.1.5.jar.so()(64bit) subclipse-core.jar.so()(64bit) svnClientAdapter.jar.so()(64bit) eclipse-subclipse = 1.1.5-1.fc6 = /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db eclipse-platform ganymed-ssh2 >= 209 java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.33 javasvn >= 1.1.0 libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) subversion-javahl >= 1.3.1 eclipse-subclipse-book-1.1.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm eclipse-subclipse-book = 1.1.5-1.fc6 = eclipse-subclipse = 1.1.5-1.fc6 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets present (rebuild-gcj-db) are OK. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. The subversion book is provided as an eclipse plugin in a separate package. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 05:27:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250527.k7P5R622027217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 01:17 EST ------- Assigning to me. * manual file issue >> * The included file /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 is >> necessary? > Manual :) Well, I should have explained why I asked for this manual. My build log by using mock says: ...... /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 lib/xcircuit.1 /var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 ...... /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 './lib/xcircuit.1' '/var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man1/xcircuit.1' ...... So, actually the file /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 and /usr/share/man/man1/xcircuit.1.gz are the same. So I mentioned that /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 may be unnecessary. * desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ -add-category Engineering \ This requires "update-desktop-database /usr/share/applications" on %post and %postun stage and adding %{_bindir}/update-desktop-database to Requires(post), Requires(postun) . Now /usr/share/applications/fedora-xcircuit.desktop says: --------------------- [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=XCircuit Exec=xcircuit Icon=xcircuit Type=Application Terminal=false GenericName=xcircuit Categories=Qt;KDE;Education;Science;X-Fedora;Engineering; X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.10 --------------------- Does Qt or KDE required? I still gain the following error message: --------------------- loading history file ... 1 events added error in slave eval: image type "xpm" doesn't exist Main console display active (Tcl8.4.13 / Tk8.4.13) (xcircuit) 2 % --------------------- Is this message related to Qt or KDE? Please check why I get this message or tell me what other information you want to diagnose this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 05:28:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250528.k7P5SnnZ027303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 06:33:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250633.k7P6XSfA029084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-08-25 02:23 EST ------- Blocker: * should not require nagios-plugins; see bug #203689 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 06:49:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250649.k7P6nhlh029717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-25 02:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134889) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134889&action=view) csound manual sources extracted from cvs repository. These manual sources come from the csound cvs repository and correspond to the 5.03 release. Details are in the spec file I'm about to upload. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 07:01:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250701.k7P71xw8030387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134885|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-25 02:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134891) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134891&action=view) spec v4++ This version creates a -manual subpackage from the csound manual sources I've uploaded (%{SOURCE1} in the spec file). csound5gui's Help menu should be fixed to look for HTML from this package instead of from somewhere in /usr/share. I can do this tomorrow unless somebody beats me to it. Now that I think of it, csound5gui should get an application desktop icon. Sorry for all of these changes -- I just want this package to be all that it can be (and not have any feature regressions from the older PlanetCCRMA csound package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 07:55:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250755.k7P7t5AO001019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 03:45 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-3.src.rpm Since I'm unable to recreate the "image type "xpm" doesn't exist" error, can you test the patch I've included ? %changelog - 3.4.26-3 - Fixed xcircuit.desktop and removed unneccessary installation for manual - Used update-desktop-database in %%post and %%postun - patch for "image type "xpm" doesn't exist" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 08:23:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 04:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190344] Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250823.k7P8NV4b003364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-08-25 04:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I do not know about other reviewers but I like to take a look into the spec file > before I decide whether or not to spend more time with a review request. I agree with Till. In addition to that, during reviews, reviewing the spec often is sufficient to provide comments on/monitor progress of a package. In such cases, the spec file avoids unnecessarily wasting bandwidth on d/l's of srpms. (In this particular case, the srpm is small, so providing the spec would not make much difference to d/l'ing the srpm. In case of XX MB packages, it does.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:03:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250903.k7P93GWs006111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 04:53 EST ------- Well, I have not yet tested 3.4.26-3, however, I have noticed one thing which may solve the problem "image type "xpm" doesn't exist" problem. When I rebuilt 3.4.26-2 WITH mock, I always get the error above, However, when I rebuilt 3.4.26-2 WITHOUT mock (i.e. usual "rpmbuild"), it seems that I don't get the error. So I suspect that some BR are missing and something needed is not rebuilt or created. I attach the build logs with/without mock. Currently, I get errors on mock build so I cannot check 3.4.26-3 with/without mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:05:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250905.k7P95nk2006287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 04:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134899) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134899&action=view) Build log of 3.4.26-2 withOUT mock Build log of 3.4.26-2 with normal rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:11:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250911.k7P9B5RS006646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 05:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134900) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134900&action=view) Build log of 3.4.26-2 WITH mock Build log of 3.4.26-2 WITH mock. Through quick check, I am concerned in the following diff: checking if -Wno-pointer-sign accepted in CFLAGS... yes -checking for deflate in -lz... yes +checking for deflate in -lz... no checking for va_copy... yes checking for __va_copy... yes checking if u_char defined... yes -checking X11/xpm.h usability... yes -checking X11/xpm.h presence... yes -checking for X11/xpm.h... yes -checking for XpmCreateImageFromData in -lXpm... yes +checking X11/xpm.h usability... no +checking X11/xpm.h presence... no +checking for X11/xpm.h... no +configure: WARNING: Xpm header not found checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:20:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250920.k7P9KGaQ007220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-08-25 05:10 EST ------- Major issue - Tripwire initialisation fails, missing twinstall.sh file: According to /etc/cron.daily/tripwire-check (and quickstart guide) you need to: **** Run "/etc/tripwire/twinstall.sh" and/or "tripwire --init". **** - /etc/tripwire/twinstall.sh file does not exist - $ tripwire --init ### Error: File could not be opened. ### Filename: /etc/tripwire/tw.cfg ### No such file or directory ### Configuration file could not be read. ### Exiting... Minor issue - version mismatch documentation: Quickstart Guide /usr/share/doc/tripwire-2.4.0.1/quickstart.txt refers multiple times to Tripwire v2.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:24:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250924.k7P9OcXx007706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-08-25 05:14 EST ------- > Minor issue - version mismatch documentation: > > Quickstart Guide /usr/share/doc/tripwire-2.4.0.1/quickstart.txt refers multiple > times to Tripwire v2.3. Man pages also refer to Tripwire 2.3.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:24:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250924.k7P9Ov78007752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 05:15 EST ------- In accordance to http://opencircuitdesign.com/pipermail/xcircuit-dev/2006/000232.html, I've patched the wrapper.tcl. If this doesn't help I'll add libXpm-devel and zlib-devel as BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:37:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250937.k7P9bjfS009105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 05:27 EST ------- Chitlesh, surely I received your mail and I redownloaded 3.4.26-3 . Currently as mentioned on comment #5 mock build fails because of mock itself, not because of your srpm so I cannot check your package now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:49:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250949.k7P9nw0B009932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-08-25 05:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Major issue - Tripwire initialisation fails, missing twinstall.sh file: > > According to /etc/cron.daily/tripwire-check (and quickstart guide) you need to: > > **** Run "/etc/tripwire/twinstall.sh" and/or "tripwire --init". **** Ok, I missed '/usr/share/doc/tripwire-2.4.0.1/README.RPM' which states you should run /usr/sbin/tripwire-setup-keyfiles after RPM install (in stead of /etc/tripwire/twinstall.sh). Maybe this information should be included in file /etc/cron.daily/tripwire-check as well, because it could lead to confusion with users during initialisation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:55:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250955.k7P9twd1010173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|192417 | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-25 05:46 EST ------- Updated srpm, such that xbae don't depend on Wcl http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/xbae.spec http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/xbae-4.60.4-2.src.rpm - remove dependency on Wcl-devel (was only of use for an example) - clean docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:56:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250956.k7P9uBxt010194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|192418 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 09:57:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608250957.k7P9vCNU010256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-25 05:47 EST ------- Closing for lack of submitter interest, and certainly lack of reviewer interest. I could reopen it if somebody is interested in reviewing it and having it in extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 10:31:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251031.k7PAV7bf011897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182027 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-08-25 06:21 EST ------- Could we give a spin to this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 10:34:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251034.k7PAYC19012097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 06:24 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome-0.1.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 10:35:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251035.k7PAZwx1012231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-25 06:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > Quite possible. Perhaps better would be to update the gnash source to cvs head? That would be bad idea, since the cvs head is moving very fast. In my case what fixed the X crash issues was not a change in gnash, but switching to the rawhide Mesa/xorg (but not to the latest drv-i810...) > Updated package: > http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec > http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-5.src.rpm > > For the record I don't really like the "flooding" of tmpdirs behaviour very > much, but it seems like the simplest secure implementation possible. I guess > X uses something similar for its /tmp/xses-$USER.XXXXXX session log files. > A better implementation would probably save the .swf files in a directory like > "/tmp/gnash-$USER/" owned by USER having permission 0700. > It should also take account of TMPDIR I suppose. But I'm lazy... ;) It also seems the best compromise to me. It won't be a problem in next release anyway, with streaming, and personal directory. All the issues have been solved, so I am ready to approve. One last thing I would like is that somewhere it is marked that gnash is usable, but also that it won't work for many flash sites and that it is known to crash often and even trigger bugs that crash the graphical system (or something along those lines), either in the README.fedora or, maybe better, in the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 11:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251110.k7PBA7FA015049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-25 07:00 EST ------- There is a missing %defattr(-,root,root,-) for klash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 12:11:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251211.k7PCBAjS018653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 08:01 EST ------- Well, I temporally downgraded yum to 2.9.3-2 to use mock. (In reply to comment #8) > In accordance to > http://opencircuitdesign.com/pipermail/xcircuit-dev/2006/000232.html, > I've patched the wrapper.tcl. > > If this doesn't help I'll add libXpm-devel and zlib-devel as BR Well, mock build 3.4.26-3.fc6 still bear the same error, no icons appear on left side, while normal rpmbuild 3.4.26-3 seems okay. Try adding some BR. BTW, %SOURCE2 (xcircuit.png) is something that one can get from some URL? If so, specify the URL where xcircuit.png exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 12:12:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251212.k7PCCaE2018719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 08:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, mock build 3.4.26-3.fc6 still bear the same error, no icons > appear on left side, Oops.. I meant no icons appear on RIGHT side...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 12:23:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251223.k7PCNpd6019236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-25 08:14 EST ------- Patrice, good points: would you like to take ownership of this package? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 12:49:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251249.k7PCn9XG020595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 08:39 EST ------- rpmlint became clean. I think that this package is almost okay. Assigning to me. Well: * HTML documents [tasaka1 at localhost SOURCES]$ rpm -ql kpolynome /usr/bin/kpolynome /usr/share/applications/fedora-kpolynome.desktop /usr/share/apps/kpolynome /usr/share/apps/kpolynome/kpolynomeui.rc /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2 /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/COPYING /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/NEWS /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/TODO /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/kpolynome.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/kpolynome.png ...... All HTML docs disappeared. I think you forgot to add some entry to %doc. * Changelog %changelog * Fri Aug 25 2006 Chitlesh Goorah - Fixed xcircuit.desktop I think this is only a typo. * chmod -x src/{drawwidget.*,maindi ..... Umm, well, it is okay, however, $ find . -name \*.cpp -o -name \*.h | xargs chmod 0644 (pwd is $builddir/kpolynome-0.1.2) in %prep stage is perhaps simpler. * Requires: kdelibs is necessary? This package requires libkdecore.so.4 and this correctly requires kdelibs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 12:56:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251256.k7PCuP5e020922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-25 08:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134912) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134912&action=view) spec file patch to add a warning in description and fix deffatr for klash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 12:57:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251257.k7PCv8eE020981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-25 08:47 EST ------- Sure, but it will be simpler if I take ownership after it is imported in cvs by you. I attach a patch for the spec file, with that patch applied it is approved, you can then import it in cvs, but add me in the owner.list as primary owner, and put yourself in the initial cc list. Does it sounds good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 13:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251300.k7PD0cqq021138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-25 08:50 EST ------- Another thing, I don't think there shouldn't be a branch for FC-5, given that gnash seems to trigger a mesa bug a bit too often, which seems to be fixed in FC-6. Does that sound good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 13:54:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251354.k7PDs3kA024407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-25 09:44 EST ------- I'm working on getting an account up, but the CLA system doesn't seem to like me. I've sent a mail to the suggested email address for help, but so far no reply. I'll keep you posted as things progress... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 14:07:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251407.k7PE7LTa025586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-25 09:57 EST ------- I've got an specfile that does the doc redirect, and also fixes up Requires. Turns out I can't glob %{_bindir} files in the main package, because then RPM thinks that the main package owns %{_bindir} files that it should not. I'm talking about: %files %{_bindir}/ %files tk %{_bindir}/brkpt That makes the main package think it owns brkpt, which means both a perl and a tk dep in the main package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 14:22:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251422.k7PEMekk026555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 dcbw at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134832|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #134891|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-25 10:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134917) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134917&action=view) specfile v5 This specfile re-adds the non-globbed bindir and libdir files. I folded in the documentation changes and added bits to change the documentation path in csound5gui to the correct path for the manual package, and also to use 'xdg-open' rather than the hardcoded 'firefox'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 14:26:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251426.k7PEQKb6026833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-08-25 10:16 EST ------- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 14:53:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251453.k7PErhJR028978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-08-25 10:43 EST ------- This is by no means blocked. The comments listed in 203689 are not required in the packaging guidelines anywhere (that I found anyway) If I'm mistaken please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 15:02:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251502.k7PF23Od029810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-08-25 10:52 EST ------- Sorry, I thought I posted these: SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nrpe/nrpe.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nrpe/nrpe-2.5.2-3.src.rpm Changelog: - no longer owns libdir/nagios - buildrequires tcp_wrappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 15:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251508.k7PF8eHc030322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 10:58 EST ------- > Well, mock build 3.4.26-3.fc6 still bear the same error, no icons > appear on right side, What do you mean? in the kmenu/gnome menu ? > BTW, %SOURCE2 (xcircuit.png) is something that one can get from > some URL? If so, specify the URL where xcircuit.png exists. > The original png is from http://opencircuitdesign.com/xcircuit/archive/xcircuit.xpm but I've changed it to 32x32 in order to use you it in the kmenu/gnome menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 15:32:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251532.k7PFW1HY031933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 11:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134927) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134927&action=view) snapshot of xcircuit build in mock (In reply to comment #12) > > Well, mock build 3.4.26-3.fc6 still bear the same error, no icons > > appear on right side, > > What do you mean? in the kmenu/gnome menu ? I don't use KDE, so I usually use GNOME. When using 3.4.26-3 rebuild by normal rpmbuild, I can see some colorful icons on the right side. On the other hand when using 3.4.26-3.fc6, the same error appears and no icons appear. Please see the attached snapshot of xcircuit-3.4.26-3.fc6 in GNOME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 15:36:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251536.k7PFatCm032514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 11:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134930) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134930&action=view) snapshot of xcircuit build by usual rpmbuild snapshot of 3.4.26-3 rebuild by usual rpmbuild. I can see some colorful icons on the right side, perhaps which is expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 15:41:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251541.k7PFfQ2c000370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-08-25 11:31 EST ------- Files section still wrong: Package needs to own %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} *.pyo files should no longer be ghosted, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#head-e48d83dfeb5e671e2018d361d6e75d7e6c6e519c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 15:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251542.k7PFggJ0000562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 11:32 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-4.src.rpm %changelog - Added libXt-devel and zlib-devel as BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 15:46:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251546.k7PFkjwm000994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-25 11:37 EST ------- I tested the rpm, it worked fine on x86. I got the same result as here. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134930&action=view -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 16:28:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251628.k7PGSwa6004200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 12:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Updated: > Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec > SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-4.src.rpm > > %changelog > - Added libXt-devel and zlib-devel as BR Still not okay for me. Adding libXpm-devel for BR furthermore seems to work well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 16:59:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] New: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ochusha.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ochusha-0.5.8.2-1.src.rpm Description: The ochusha is BBS, especially 2ch.net, browser with GUI. It uses the GTK+ toolkit for all of its interface needs. The ochusha offers a sort of features such as multi-level popup view of `response's, inlining and popup view of images that helps users to interact with BBSs. ----------------------------- Note: Details of 2ch are on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2channel >From en wikipedia: 2channel is thought to be the largest Internet forum in the world. With over 10 million visitors every day (as of 2001), it is gaining significant influence in Japanese society, approaching that of traditional mass media such as television, radio, and magazines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 17:04:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251704.k7PH4JNF006344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 13:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134937) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134937&action=view) Rebuild log of ochusha in mock * This package can be rebuilt in mock. * rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 17:30:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251730.k7PHUgXX007579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134917|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-25 13:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134940) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134940&action=view) spec file v5++ This adds a -fluidsynth subpackage. I didn't realize this was available until I built on a machine with fluidsynth-devel installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 18:07:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251807.k7PI7XVK009641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 14:07 EST ------- Updated http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor.spec http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor-0.0.1-5.src.rpm before, I forgot to increment from 3 to 4, that's why we are at 5 now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 18:28:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204121] New: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 Summary: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Tremulous is a free, open source game that blends a team based FPS with elements of an RTS. Players can choose from 2 unique races, aliens and humans. Players on both teams are able to build working structures in-game like an RTS. These structures provide many functions, the most important being spawning. The designated builders must ensure there are spawn structures or other players will not be able to rejoin the game after death. Other structures provide automated base defense (to some degree), healing functions and much more... Player advancement is different depending on which team you are on. As a human, players are rewarded with credits for each alien kill. These credits may be used to purchase new weapons and upgrades from the Armoury The alien team advances quite differently. Upon killing a human foe, the alien is able to evolve into a new class. The more kills gained the more powerful the classes available. The overall objective behind Tremulous is to eliminate the opposing team. This is achieved by not only killing the opposing players but also removing their ability to respawn by destroying their spawn structures. --- Notice that this package is build from a modified upstream source because the original upstream source contains a tool called lcc which is not Free Software. Luckily tremulous can be build without this just fine. So this package is build from a modified source with lcc removed. Also notice that this package requires tremulous-data, which I will submit for review right after this and then post the bug no here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 18:29:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251829.k7PITLmI011674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 kyrian at ore.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kyrian at ore.org ------- Additional Comments From kyrian at ore.org 2006-08-25 14:29 EST ------- The recipie used here is about the same as I came up with to create an RPM that built with GCC4, using the patch detailed under the SF.net project for Tripwire. It is possible to get prior versions to compile using backward-compatible libstdc++ and gcc-c++ packages, but I don't think that should be a concern any more. The version and documentation changes required should be basically trivial to do. I have no idea what rpmlint does, but I'd be willing to find out, and I think we should be sure to include the 'COMMERCIAL' and 'TRADEMARK' documents from the original source tarball. As per threads on Fedora Extras list, and in the IRC meeting, I would be happy to step forward as formal maintainer of a Tripwire package for FC5 and onwards. In theory at least, I should be able to do this for i386 and x86_64 as I have machines of both architectures, but I am hesitant about the latter since I am actively trying NOT to use x86_64 native stuff on it because it breaks LOADS of Desktop stuff on Fedora at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 18:32:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201913] Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251832.k7PIWOCp012130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-gcc-34 - GCC 3.4.6-RH compatibility compiler and libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201913 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-08-25 14:31 EST ------- New bug #204124 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 18:32:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] New: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Data files for tremulous the Quake 3 based FPS game --- Notice that this package requires tremulous to be usefull, see bug 204121 for the tremulous review. Also I unfortunatly uploaded the binary noarch file instead of the SRPM, so you have to wait for atleast an hour after the submission of this bug before donwloading the SRPM, so that the SRPM upload can finish (yes its huge). If you want the data in the mean time to test the tremulous engine package, its here: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data-1.1.0-1.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 18:45:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251845.k7PIjDhW013486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-25 14:45 EST ------- Woops, I forgot one other very important thing, the COPYING file included in this package says: ---------------------------------------------------------- Tremulous License -- Tremulous is licensed in two broadly separate sections: the code and the media. The code is licensed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. This license is contained in full in the file named GPL. Please be aware of the exceptions to this license as listed below. The media is licensed under the CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION-SHAREALIKE 2.5 LICENSE. Please read http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ to learn more about this license. The full license text is contained in the file named CC. Please be aware of the exceptions to this license as listed below. --------------------------------------------------- Media License Exceptions -- All shaderlab (http://www.shaderlab.com/) textures (by Randy 'ydnar' Reddig) are subject to the following license: Usage and redistribution policy: Textures may be freely downloaded, modified, and used in free maps, mods or total conversions provided this copyright notice is left intact and a link to Shaderlab is provided in the credits or read-me file. Other non-commercial applications are considered on a case-by-case basis via e-mail. All other usage requires written permission. Bulk redistribution or archival of the textures in any medium, digital or otherwise (except mapping packages for mods) is prohibited. This non free exception no longer is valid. There has been some discussion about this on debian-legal where it it claimed that the involved textures have been relicensed / rereleased by Randy 'ydnar' Reddig under the same CC license as the rest of the tremulous data. I know such a claim in itself is not good enough to distribute so I've contacted Randy 'ydnar' Reddig myself and this was his reply: --- I already released the Tremulous textures (I think) under a CC license so it could be included with Debian. This should suffice for FC right? Randy --- Which unfortunatly is still a bit vague, but has made me believe that Debians claim is valid. I've asked Randy for a more clear statement with regard to the license, to have something sane to include into the SRPM. I myself concider not having this statement a blocker, but I expect to receive it soon and wanted to start the review process now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 19:19:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251919.k7PJJX6M015968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 15:19 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-5.src.rpm - Added libXpm-devel as BR to prevent "image type "xpm" doesn't exist" error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 19:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608251925.k7PJPsqD016439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-25 15:25 EST ------- Erm, Oops, this was already approved and here I'm waiting for approval. I guess that the approval still stands? Then I'll omport 1.0.0-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 20:26:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608252026.k7PKQIsL020441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-25 16:26 EST ------- Yup, sounds good to me. I will import it over the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 20:30:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] New: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: triad at df.lth.se QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/libmtp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/libmtp-0.0.13-1.src.rpm Description: libmtp is a client library to access devices using the MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) for file and metadata transfer to different digital media players. This package is currently used by gnomad2 and amarok, both in FE and users are mailing me bug reports.. If you have questions for upstream then post them here because as with libnjb I *am* upstream. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 20:47:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608252047.k7PKlE48021975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-25 16:47 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome-0.1.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 21:03:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608252103.k7PL3XpL022864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-25 17:03 EST ------- I just did a quick double check of the -9 package and it both looks and plays ok. APPROVED (still) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 21:07:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608252107.k7PL7ugt023060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-25 17:07 EST ------- Are there any translations available for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 21:25:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] New: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-File-NFSLock.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-File-NFSLock-1.20-1.src.rpm Description: Program based of concept of hard linking of files being atomic across NFS. This concept was mentioned in Mail::Box::Locker (which was originally presented in Mail::Folder::Maildir). Some routine flow is taken from there -- particularly the idea of creating a random local file, hard linking a common file to the local file, and then checking the nlink status. Some ideologies were not complete (uncache mechanism, shared locking) and some coding was even incorrect (wrong stat index). File::NFSLock was written to be light, generic, and fast. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 25 21:29:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] New: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: A flexible, scriptable, extensible screen reader for the GNOME platform that provides access via speech synthesis, braille, and magnification. This is a 200%+ better accessibility library than gnopernicus of which it replaces and has been adopted upstream by GNOME to replace gnopernicus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 02:37:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260237.k7Q2bSUo030970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 22:37 EST ------- Moving to final check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 02:37:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260237.k7Q2bSRK030971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-25 22:37 EST ------- Seems functionally okay. Moving to final check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 04:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260442.k7Q4gW0w003435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 05:35:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260535.k7Q5ZEg5004501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-26 01:35 EST ------- Build (finally), closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 05:35:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260535.k7Q5ZPs3004524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 Bug 202439 depends on bug 202437, which changed state. Bug 202437 Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 05:48:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260548.k7Q5m1X5004905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-08-26 01:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire-2.4.0.1-1.4.src.rpm Thanks for the feedback all, I have updated all the external documentation to reflect version 2.4, but not the internal text files (quickstart.txt) or man pages. I've submitted a bug to upstream asking them to correct the documentation in the next release. In the mean time, is it Fedora's (and thus ours as the packagers) responsibility to fix silly things like forgetting to bump version numbers in your documentation? Obviously some quick command-line perl will do the job nicely in %pre... what is everyone's feeling on the subject? I have removed the %config flag from the cron script... I'm not entire sure why it was there to begin with. rpmlint output is now nonexistent :) Also, I now echo the contents of README.RPM upon package install to let users know about the next step required to initialize their tripwire database. I also now include the COMMERCIAL file as a %doc (TRADEMARK was already there) Kyrian, I would love to have you join this package as a co-maintainer once this gets approved for FC5/6, especially as an x86_64 sanity check and another pair of eyes at maintaining this rarely-updated code. Are there any other differences between this approach and the RPM that you created? rpmlint is a quick rpm 'sanity check' utility that scans through source as well as binary RPM files for common mistakes and guideline violations. It is usually the first tool run by package reviewers to make sure there isn't anything majorly wrong with a submitted package before diving in and running checks manually. You can 'yum update rpmlint' to get it, and then run it against any RPM. The output is usually self-explanatory ('E'rrors and 'W'arnings), and SOME output can be justified on a per-package basis, but no complaints from rpmlint is usually desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 06:01:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 02:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260601.k7Q61GvP005211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-26 02:01 EST ------- Thanks, Importad and build, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 07:10:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260710.k7Q7Ad4a006709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 03:10 EST ------- A question: Would you check the files in /usr/share/doc/kpolynome-0.1.2/{en,hu}/ , especially Makefile* in that directory necessary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 07:15:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260715.k7Q7F4Jp006862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 03:14 EST ------- Still I am checking...... Remove windows related files, i.e. please remove /usr/share/doc/xcircuit-3.4.26/examples/win32 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 07:41:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193102] Review Request: python-mad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260741.k7Q7fOpN008219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193102 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-08-26 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/python-mad.spec > SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/python-mad-0.5.1.src.rpm > Description: Python Bindings to libmad > This is my first package and I need a sponsor You'd better push it into Livna repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 07:52:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260752.k7Q7qFkO008815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 03:52 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome-0.1.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 09:02:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] New: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Heap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Heap-0.71-1.src.rpm Description: The Heap collection of modules provide routines that manage a heap of elements. A heap is a partially sorted structure that is always able to easily extract the smallest of the elements in the structure (or the largest if a reversed compare routine is provided). If the collection of elements is changing dynamically, the heap has less overhead than keeping the collection fully sorted. The elements must be objects as described in "Heap::Elem" and all elements inserted into one heap must be mutually compatible - either the same class exactly or else classes that differ only in ways unrelated to the Heap::Elem interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 09:11:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204163] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.06-1.src.rpm Description: HTML::FormatText::WithLinks takes HTML and turns it into plain text but prints all the links in the HTML as footnotes. By default, it attempts to mimic the format of the lynx text based web browser's --dump option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 09:14:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204164] New: Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204164 Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: LWP::Authen::Wsse allows LWP to authenticate against servers that are using the X-WSSE authentication scheme, as required by the Atom Authentication API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 09:18:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260918.k7Q9IJVO013162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 05:18 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 09:27:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260927.k7Q9Rvrg013491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-26 05:27 EST ------- Okay, from the latest... fails to build in mock - you need to add libjpeg-devel to the BRs rpmlint is mostly clean (I'm ignoring packages without docs). The exceptions are csound-java : W: no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_jcsound.so W: symlink-should-be-relative %{_datadir}/java/csnd.jar %{_libdir}/%{name}/java.csnd.jar csound-osc: E: explicit-lib-dependency liblo csound-manual: E: zero-length %{_docdir}/%{name}-manual-%{version}/examples/ifthen.csd Other things... The Dist: number doesn't get increased with each new release. The problem with that is that when I'm tracking, it's a bitch to find a difference when you have to check datestamps instead of something nice like the Dist number. Can you please increment with each alteration? When you add a new tarball, can you please respin the src.rpm - it makes life a damned sight easier for review and testing purposes. I don't have a problem with minor things like spec files and patches, but whopping huge addins - that's another thing. Please change the printf redefinition. Not interested in upstream, it's wrong and is also a possible security problem (printf is well defined in terms of what it does and it's problems, the new printf is a different kettle of fish). If it helps, rename the function cs_printf. It will probably take a minute to do a glob|regex search and replace on the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 09:37:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204166] New: Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204166 Summary: Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/xeuphoric.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/xeuphoric-0.18.2-2.src.rpm Description: xeuphoric is an emulator which covers the range of Oric computers and it's add ons. The ROMS are not a problem on this application - all of the companies which at one time have owned or been part of the lineage of the ORIC computers have all bit the dust with no successors in name or who have the rights. The emulator itself has been around for 7 years now (it was written by an engineer at Microsoft!) and is widely used around the world. Current development has stopped which means there are a number of unresolved issues (such as the x86_64/ia64 blocker due to problems with the assembler code). However, I will shortly be taking this package over and will resolve this issue. There will also be a desktop icon at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 09:38:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204166] Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608260938.k7Q9clHp014436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204166 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |179259 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 10:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 06:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] New: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libgeda.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libgeda-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: This package contains libgeda, the library needed by gEDA applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 10:15:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 06:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177107] Review Request: libgeda - library for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261015.k7QAFJZP016595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - library for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177107 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 06:15 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204168 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 10:15:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 06:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261015.k7QAFVQT016616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 06:15 EST ------- *** Bug 177107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 10:16:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 06:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261016.k7QAGsAu016683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 06:16 EST ------- I'll be using this library to push the Geda suite to FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 11:40:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261140.k7QBeMBL020045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 07:40 EST ------- Updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ochusha.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ochusha-0.5.8.2-2.src.rpm to explicitly require Japanese fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 12:27:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261227.k7QCRY0j021414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 08:27 EST ------- Fully checked. The remained things are: >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Using %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS You use both %{_builddir} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . Choose one (although this is very cosmetic). >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : - All is okay. Other packaging issues: * %{__rm} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/examples/.xcircuitrc The explicit description of the directory %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/ is not necessary because the working directory is that directory. * Well, you removed /usr/share/man/man1/xcircuit.1.gz and decided to install /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 , right? However, by doing this the simple use of "man xcircuit" no longer works, I have to explicitly point to the manual file "man /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1", which is unpleasant to me. Could you explain why? Other functional issues: - All is okay. xcircuit surely works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 13:08:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] New: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgarski at post.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dakar.lunixsys.com/~mgarski/digikam-doc.spec SRPM URL: http://dakar.lunixsys.com/~mgarski/digikam-doc-0.8.2-1.src.rpm Description: Documentation for the digiKam and Showfoto. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 14:04:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261404.k7QE48ua024809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 10:03 EST ------- Fully checked. The remained things are: >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires Requires: kdelibs Again, why is this exclicit requirement needed? /usr/bin/kpolynome requires libkdecore.so.4 and this is included in kdelibs. So this package automatically requires kdelibs even without the explicit statement above is not written. I suspect that the sentence can be removed. * Using %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS You use both %{_builddir} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . Choose one (although this is very cosmetic). Other thing are all okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 14:26:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261426.k7QEQIUP025346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 10:26 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome-0.1.2-6.src.rpm %Changelog - 0.1.2-6 - Replaced $$RPM_BUILD_ROOT by %%{buildroot} - Removed requires: kdelibs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 14:29:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261429.k7QETYw7025399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-26 10:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade-0.17-18.src.rpm -18 has epoch in versioned dependency for libxml-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 14:45:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261445.k7QEjsPE025945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 10:45 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 14:53:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261453.k7QErPU7026127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 karlthered at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-08-26 10:53 EST ------- It has been imported and it builds fine on all supported platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 15:27:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261527.k7QFRBdk026938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 11:27 EST ------- Sorry, one thing I missed to notice.... %{__cp} %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/..... Please use %{__cp} -p to keep timestamp. Aside for above, nothing to be fixed is left. Now I am pleased to say that this package (xcircuit) is APPROVED. ---------------------------------------------------- BTW, if you don't mind, would you review my package (bug 204112) ? (this package is usually for Japanese people using a BBS known to Japanese people) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 15:40:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261540.k7QFeBT2027402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 11:39 EST ------- Okay. Now I am pleased to say that this package (kpolynome) is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 15:52:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261552.k7QFqtMk028143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 15:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261554.k7QFsMia028241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 17:11:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261711.k7QHB22F030203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 13:10 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (BSD) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} . - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. **** For the installed icons to show up in GNOME/KDE menus right after package installation, and speeds up GTK+ applications' access to the icons, you should add (below) in your spec file Requires(post): %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache Requires(postun): %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache %post /sbin/ldconfig touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications %postun /sbin/ldconfig touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications **** - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 17:33:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261733.k7QHXoM2030820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 17:33:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261733.k7QHXvIe030842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 17:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261757.k7QHvXtI031574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 13:57 EST ------- Well, actually the icon of ochusha was not under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor, so I created a symlink and added gtk-update-icon-cache entry. Updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ochusha.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ochusha-0.5.8.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 17:59:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261759.k7QHxlVp031656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 13:59 EST ------- The build of x86_64 is failing :( + /bin/rm /var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-9.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 /bin/rm: cannot remove `/var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-9.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6460 (%install) http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14606 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 18:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261802.k7QI28Hd031815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-08-26 14:02 EST ------- Thanks for your patch Laurent, it's added to the spec file. Spec : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm.spec SPRM : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm-1.2-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 18:05:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261805.k7QI5mMo031995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 14:05 EST ------- * %{__rm} %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}-3.4/man/%{name}.1 build log (on x86_64) says: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 lib/xcircuit.1 /var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-9.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 So, a very simple idea is to change to: %{__rm} %{buildroot}%{_prefix}/lib*/%{name}-3.4/man/%{name}.1 or to change Makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 18:12:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261812.k7QICOsD032131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) Alias: conexusmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 18:50:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261850.k7QIoNbi002784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-26 14:50 EST ------- + /bin/rm /var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-12.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 As you can see this one is OK + chmod -x /var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-12.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/console.tcl chmod: cannot access `/var/tmp/xcircuit-3.4.26-12.fc5-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/console.tcl': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80812 (%install) but it fails here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 18:52:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261852.k7QIqRoJ002959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-26 14:52 EST ------- Well, I looked at the log of -11 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-extras/14611-xcircuit-3.4.26-11.fc5/ The build log says that configure failed to find tclConfig.sh and so finally /usr/lib*/xcircuit-3.4/console.tcl is not created. checking for tclConfig.sh... can't find Tcl configuration script "tclConfig.sh" Reverting to non-Tcl compilation I checked tcl-devel-8.4.13-1.1.x86_64 and tclConfig.sh was at /usr/lib64/tclConfig.sh . xcircuit configure seems to have the option: --with-tcl=DIR Find tclConfig.sh in DIR Try this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 18:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191507] Review Request: wifi-radar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608261854.k7QIsMKR003056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wifi-radar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191507 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 21:43:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608262143.k7QLhMh2007553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-26 17:43 EST ------- Just a minor remark: make LIBTOOL=%{_prefix}/bin/libtool should be make LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 22:07:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608262207.k7QM7oNM008223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-26 18:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec Fixes #20 and a couple of other minor points. I've not uploaded a new src.rpm as nothing has changed in that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 23:03:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608262303.k7QN3Klh009512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-08-26 19:03 EST ------- FYI, I have run it through mock without problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 26 23:27:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204210] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204210 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF/perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF-0.04-1.src.rpm Description: This module understands the W3CDTF date/time format, an ISO 8601 profile, defined at http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime. This format as the native date format of RSS 1.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 01:56:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270156.k7R1usxS013595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 03:17:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270317.k7R3H43S015977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-26 23:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Cool, looks good now and builds fine; rpmlint is silent. Sorry for the long delay. I've cleaned up everything you mentioned, with one exception: > I'm not sure that anything you depend on owns /usr/share/icons or the > directories under it. (At least in FC5.) Is this really a problem? If so, why? And what should I do about it? Thanks! Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx-2.2.1-7.src.rpm AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 04:09:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204210] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270409.k7R49r8v017326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204210 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-27 00:09 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software, licences included * spec legible * match upstream 5ad0a41bb5de08f9c16395ea311bb491 ./DateTime-Format-W3CDTF-0.04.tar.gz * sane provides: Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::W3CDTF) = 0.04 * %files right -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 04:10:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204210] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270410.k7R4AZU5017392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204210 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-27 00:10 EST ------- Forgot to say that it is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 04:10:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270410.k7R4Aoas017414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-27 00:10 EST ------- Okay, first run through the spec... FIXME's: 1) per the pre-release package naming conventions at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ NamingGuidelines, I believe the Release: ought to be 0.1.20060823svn%{?dist} 2) The tarball contains %doc-worthy material. These files need to be added to one of the packages: AUTHORS COPYING COPYRIGHT README, probably just to the main libburn package. 3) the 'mixed spaces and tabs' error can be remedied by replacing the tabs in cdrskin's Version: and Release: lines with spaces. 4) the rpmlint shellbang warnings appear to be due to everything in libisofs/ having execute permissions, an extra line in the spec can take care of it. Doesn't matter if its done in the spec or by hand in this case, since you created the svn tarball, but I think its ultimately better to do it in the spec, just in case the upstream 0.2 release still has execute bits set, so you don't have to modify an upstream release tarball in the future. Certainly holler at them to get that fixed though... 5) the Requires: in cdrskin needs to be corrected, it'll currently result in cdrskin requiring libburn 0.1.4. 6) I'd leave off the Release: field in cdrskin, since its redundant. 7) might want to use %{mainver} in more places, to avoid winding up with conflicting version numbers here and there (that different version on cdrskin certainly does make life interesting...). With some minor spec tweaks, I've got the rpmlint spew down to a minimum now, all ignorable warnings: $ rpmlint /build/RPMS/x86_64/*0.1.20060823*.rpm W: cdrskin no-documentation W: libburn-devel no-documentation W: libisofs no-documentation W: libisofs-devel no-documentation Spec diff (not directly applicable, since the tabs copied as spaces, just provided "for your viewing pleasure ;): --- libburn.spec.orig 2006-08-24 14:38:14.000000000 -0400 +++ libburn.spec 2006-08-27 00:06:16.000000000 -0400 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ # define this as version gets overridden by the subpackage with its own version Name: libburn -Version: 0.2 -Release: 1.20060823svn%{?dist} +Version: %{mainver} +Release: 0.1.20060823svn%{?dist} Summary: Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ %package -n cdrskin Summary: Limited cdrecord compatibility wrapper to ease migration to libburn Group: Applications/Multimedia -Version: 0.1.4 -Release: 1.20060823svn%{?dist} -Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} +Version: 0.1.4 +Requires: %{name} = %{mainver}-%{release} %description -n cdrskin A limited cdrecord compatibility wrapper which allows to use some libburn @@ -71,6 +70,8 @@ %prep %setup -n %{name}-%{mainver}svn -q +# These shouldn't be executable... +chmod -x libisofs/* %build @@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc +%doc AUTHORS COPYING COPYRIGHT README %{_libdir}/%{name}*.so.* %files devel @@ -131,5 +132,5 @@ %changelog -* Wed Aug 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.2-1.20060823svn +* Wed Aug 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.2-0.1.20060823svn - Initial package for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 05:10:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270510.k7R5A4ZF018852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-27 01:09 EST ------- Build of xcircuit-3.4.26-16.fc{5,6} succeeded on all archs (i386, x86_64, ppc). Please check: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14637 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14638 Closing this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 06:20:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203205] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270620.k7R6Kugp020148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203205 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-27 02:20 EST ------- Is this supposed to build on FC5? I get... BUILD FAILED Buildfile: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml does not exist because this file lives at: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.1.2/scripts/build.xml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 08:22:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270822.k7R8MBvo026270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-27 04:21 EST ------- As promised a formal review, one the must fixes are fixed we can do tihs for one or two of your other packages, once I'm convinced that you've got the hang of things I'll sponsor you. MUST: ===== O rpmlint output is: W: kdiff3 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: kdiff3 incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.88-5 0.9.90-5 W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/es/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kdiff3/common ../common W: kdiff3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/kdiff3/common ../common * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok (but license file not included!) * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * Locales handled as required * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files(except for the plugin). * .desktop file as required, but not properly installed, see below MUST Fix ======== * The following rpmlint output: W: kdiff3 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: kdiff3 incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.88-5 0.9.90-5 * The desktop-file-install command is missing "--add-category X-Fedora" from its argument list * The %post / %postun scriptlets are not updating the gtk-icon-cache, causing the icon to not appear in the gnome-panel menu, please use the full scriptlets for this as given here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda * Remove this (already commented) bogus line from %files: "#%{_datadir}/locale" * Replace the empty %doc with: %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README TODO and move the line to directly below the %defattr line. Also remove the empty line between %{_datadir}/services/* and %{_mandir}/man1/kdiff3* a manfile is treated as a normal file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 08:39:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270839.k7R8dWYp010477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-27 04:39 EST ------- I imported gnash-0.7.1-7 into cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 08:49:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270849.k7R8n5NK011006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-27 04:48 EST ------- and added entry in owners.list too. I think this can be moved to FE-ACCEPT now, thanks. Patrice, please feel free to go ahead and build this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 08:53:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608270853.k7R8rFhC011211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-08-27 04:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > Another thing, I don't think there shouldn't be a branch for > FC-5, given that gnash seems to trigger a mesa bug a bit too often Perhaps an FC-5 branch can be made if and when such a bug is resolved for fc5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 09:59:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 05:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] New: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SPECS/foremost.spec SRPM URL: http://rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SRPMS/foremost-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Foremost is a console program to recover files based on their headers, footers, and internal data structures. This process is commonly referred to as data carving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:03:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271003.k7RA3X40014187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-27 06:03 EST ------- Hehehe thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:04:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204228] New: Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204228 Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SPECS/sleuthkit.spec SRPM URL: http://rindt.name/fileadmin/download/fedora/SRPMS/sleuthkit-2.05-1.src.rpm Description: The Sleuth Kit is a collection of UNIX-based command line file system forensic tools that allow an investigator to examine NTFS, FAT, FFS, EXT2FS, and EXT3FS file systems of a suspect computer in a non-intrusive fashion. The tools have a layer-based design and can extract data from internal file system structures. Because the tools do not rely on the operating system to process the file systems, deleted and hidden content is shown. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:06:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271006.k7RA6xH6014314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-27 06:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.30-3.src.rpm Fixes correctly for 64 bit Additional BRs (autoconf and automake) Moved README.build to the -devel package Fixed ownership problem on a directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:08:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200498] Review Request: btsco-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271008.k7RA89pt014371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btsco-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-08-27 06:08 EST ------- the reason why it isnt in the mainline kernel included yet is that the code is still beta and in heavy development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:09:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271009.k7RA9YlP014424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-08-27 06:09 EST ------- the reason why it isnt in the mainline kernel included yet is that the code is still beta and in heavy development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:10:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271010.k7RAA3BI014465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-27 06:10 EST ------- This package ochusha-0.5.8.2-3 has been approuved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:20:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271020.k7RAK4MI014881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-27 06:20 EST ------- Thank you for very quick review!! Now I try to import to buildsys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:39:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271039.k7RAdPgl015751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 10:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271042.k7RAgRhZ015940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-27 06:42 EST ------- Well: * build for devel succeeded. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14640 * SyncNeeded is requested for FE-5. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 11:05:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204228] Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271105.k7RB50T2016840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204228 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-08-27 07:04 EST ------- NTFS support in sleuthkit may not be allowed, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#head-e52c1870d4467fe40c9da546fe3328e4a2430834 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/65749 As well you should look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors You seem not to be sponsored, so you need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 11:15:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271115.k7RBFqwh017384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-games-list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-27 07:15 EST ------- Since Randy (the author of the shaderlab textures) has dropped of the radar again and I read in some Debian mails that Randy had given upstream permission to relicense his stuff under the CC license, I've mailed upstream. Here is their response: --- On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:36:40 +0200 Hans wrote: > > First a short intro, I'm a Linux enthousiast and developer. Lately I'm > > mainly spending my time packaging good games for the Fedora > > distribution. I've recently packaged tremulous for inclusion into > > Fedora. However the license on the shaderlab textures is stopping us > > from shipping tremulous at the moment (because it doesn't match our > > licensing guidelines). I've heard from left and right that Randy has > > released these Textures under the same CC license as the rest of the > > tremulous content and that he has send you an official statement that > > those textures may be shipped with tremulous under this CC license. > > Can you confirm this, or even better forward Randy's message to me? "This is for all the textures & other assets that Tremulous uses. I hereby place all copies of my work in Tremulous 1.1.0 (either in whole or in part) under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence version 2.5. Users are also hereby licenced to apply any newer version of the Creative Commons ShareAlike licence as they wish. Cheers, Randy Reddig" --- So that clears the licensing issue with tremulous and now we're good to go to release it. Can someone please review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 11:45:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271145.k7RBjMM6018515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-27 07:45 EST ------- I don't have FC5 to test on. I'll try to have a look from time to time, to see if mesa is updated to mesa-libGL-6.5.* and otherwise wait for user asking a branch. This is built now in devel, Jens you can close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 13:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271310.k7RDATsj020653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-27 09:10 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-1.4.2-1.src.rpm * Sun Aug 27 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.2-1 - 1.4.2, syscall and maintenance patches applied upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 13:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271321.k7RDLAlQ020907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-08-27 09:20 EST ------- I believe all of the above are fixed. Please try: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/kdiff3-0.9.90-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 14:19:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271419.k7REJmHW022285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 14:41:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271441.k7REf7Wm023022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-08-27 10:40 EST ------- * rpmlint: no problems * Package named correctly: Yes * Patches named correctly: Yes * Spec file named correctly: Yes * Licence field matches: Yes * Licence file installed: Yes (and included upstream) * Spec file in American English: Yes * Source matches upstream: Yes * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: Yes * Specfile legible: Yes * Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock: fc5/ppc) * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A * Owns directories it creates: Yes * Duplicate files: No * Permissions set correctly: Yes * Consistent macro use: Yes (but see suggestion) * %doc affects runtime: No * Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: N/A * -devel requires base: N/A * Contains .la files: No * Owns files it didn't create: No * .desktop files installed correctly: Yes 1. The URL: tag appears to point to an old site, as the latest version on this site is 1.1.10 and the source location is different. I feel http:// www.nongnu.org/crack-attack/ would be a better choice. 2. No use of %{name}-%{version} macros in Source tag. Personal preference but just a heads up if you prefer to use them. 3. Several files are installed in the %doc directory which probably shouldn't be there: *.sanitize: The patch backup files crack-attack.6: An uncompressed copy of the man page, but the man page is correctly installed in %{_mandir}/man6/ crack-attack.xml: Really a 'source' file for generating the man page so I wouldn't install it. ready_to_release: Useless to the end user IMHO and shouldn't be installed. 4. /usr/share/crack-attack/crack-attack.desktop and /usr/share/crack-attack/ crack-attack.xpm, do these files really need to be there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 15:02:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271502.k7RF2Ls1023603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-27 11:02 EST ------- So, this isn't actually a pre-release. These peices of software have been released in the past, on other websites, which is why this is a svn snapshot on top of the old release, thus the 1. naming scheme. Docs added, tabs fixed, version requires fixed, and file perms changed. I want to only use mainver where its needed, as it should go away soon when the release numbers sync up. Then I only have to change it a few places. http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libburn/libburn.spec http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libburn/libburn-0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 16:44:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271644.k7RGi0Ce026358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-27 12:43 EST ------- Hey Hans. I will take a crack at reviewing this package and possibly sponsoring you. I should get a full review out on it hopefully later today. In the mean time, you may want to take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored and perhaps add some comments to other pending reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 17:55:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271755.k7RHtFBE028605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-08-27 13:55 EST ------- Version 1.7.2 push to CVS and build for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 17:55:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190007] Review Request: php-pecl-zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271755.k7RHtnPm028620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-zip Alias: php-pecl-zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190007 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 18:37:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271837.k7RIbprF031229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-27 14:37 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: fe9d8e25b9537f6b3154d07d3da50375 terminus-font-4.20.tar.gz fe9d8e25b9537f6b3154d07d3da50375 terminus-font-4.20.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage. n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage. n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} n/a - .la files are removed. n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. See below - Should have sane scriptlets. Issues: 1. Should ping upstream to include a copy of the GPL COPYING file. 2. The Group doesn't seem right here. Other font packages use: User Interface/X (Granted that rpm groups aren't very usefull, but we should try and be consistant at least). 3. perl and gawk are in the default BuildRequires, no need to list them. 4. rpmlint says: W: terminus-font-x11 dangerous-command-in-%preun rm Why remove those files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 18:46:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271846.k7RIkgRA031939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-27 14:46 EST ------- Ping Duncan. Do you still intend to import and maintain this package? It should be all approved and ready to import... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 18:50:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271850.k7RIouUU032230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 mario at pykix.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario at pykix.org ------- Additional Comments From mario at pykix.org 2006-08-27 14:50 EST ------- Hello, Sorry for making your life bitter with different cdrskin version number. Current status is that while cdrskin may make a major (or minor) step in a period of time valuable enough to increase version number, such thing doesn't have to be true in the same period for libburn library (and cdrskin depends on libburn). The most obvious reason for this is that cdrskin is still not using all of libburn options, and that libburn development is much more complicated then the one of cdrskin itself, altought even cdrskin development isn't without it's problems. Kind regards, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 19:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] New: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ng-spice-17-1.src.rpm Description: Ngspice is a general-purpose circuit simulator program. It implements three classes of analysis: - Nonlinear DC analyses - Nonlinear Transient analyses - Linear AC analyses Ngspice implements the usual circuits elements, like resistors, capacitors, inductors (single or mutual), transmission lines and a growing number of semiconductor devices like diodes, bipolar transistors, mosfets (both bulk and SOI), mesfets, jfet and HFET. Ngspice implements the EKV model but it cannot be distributed with the package since its license does not allow to redistribute EKV source code. Ngspice integrates Xspice, a mixed-mode simulator built upon spice3c1 (and then some tweak is necessary merge it with spice3f5). Xspice provides a codemodel interface and an event-driven simulation algorithm. Users can develop their own models for devices using the codemodel interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 19:13:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271913.k7RJD5bp000678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-27 15:13 EST ------- Almost perfect, but you're not using the gtk icon cache scriptlets as provided on the wiki, your current setup will cause errors to scroll on the console (although no further harm) on 100% kde setups (iow no gtk installed). Please use the scriptlets from the wiki where ever possible. If you disagree with a scriptlet discuss this on f-e-l. These scriplets are to be concidered best of breed and should always be used where possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 19:15:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271915.k7RJFMKc000792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-27 15:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > So, this isn't actually a pre-release. These peices of software have been > released in the past, on other websites, which is why this is a svn snapshot on > top of the old release, thus the 1. naming scheme. Ah, okay. Now that I think about it, I do recall seeing some mention of a 0_2_1 tag in some merge script in the source, so that makes sense. Works for me. > Docs added, tabs fixed, version requires fixed, and file perms changed. Both Makefile and Makefile.am still have unnecessary execute permissions, but rpmlint doesn't seem to care, so good enough. Ah, and your changelog entry refers to cdrtools instead of cdrskin. > I want > to only use mainver where its needed, as it should go away soon when the release > numbers sync up. Then I only have to change it a few places. Works for me, was only an idea, shouldn't have been under the "FIXME's". Really only needed it in the Requires: for cdrskin, looks good to me. On with the formal review... * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible (GPL), license text included in package * source files match upstream: n/a, svn snapshot * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper * package builds in mock (rawhide x86_64) * rpmlint only spits acceptable warnings (W: about lack of docs in some packages) * final provides and requires are sane: cdrskin-0.1.4-2.20060823svn.fc6.x86_64.rpm cdrskin = 0.1.4-2.20060823svn.fc6 = libburn = 0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6 libburn-0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6.x86_64.rpm libburn.so.1()(64bit) libburn = 0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6 = /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig libburn.so.1()(64bit) libburn-devel-0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6.x86_64.rpm libburn-devel = 0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6 = libburn = 0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6 libburn.so.1()(64bit) pkgconfig libisofs-0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6.x86_64.rpm libisofs.so.1()(64bit) libisofs = 0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6 = /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig libisofs.so.1()(64bit) libisofs-devel-0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6.x86_64.rpm libisofs-devel = 0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6 = libisofs = 0.2-2.20060823svn.fc6 libisofs.so.1()(64bit) pkgconfig * shared libraries are present, properly named (unversioned symlinks in -devel packages, versioned libs in the right places, with appropriate calls to ldconfig in scriptlets) * package is not relocatable * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * FIXME - no duplicates in %files libisofs-devel and libburn-devel both install the same include files, /usr/include/libburn/* * file permissions are appropriate * %clean is present * %check is present and all tests pass: n/a, there is a 'make check' target, but it doesn't appear to do anything useful... * scriptlets present -- proper ldconfig's * code, not content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * FIXME - headers properly in -devel packages, but currently duplicated * pkgconfig files in -devel packages, properly Requires: pkgconfig * no libtool .la droppings * not a GUI app * not a web app Looks like the only thing to fix is the duplication of the libburn header files. I presume just drop them from libisofs-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 19:18:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271918.k7RJIMb6000898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-27 15:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry for making your life bitter with different cdrskin version number. Doesn't make my life bitter, just makes it a little wonky to package. > Current status is that while cdrskin may make a major (or minor) step in a > period of time valuable enough to increase version number, such thing doesn't > have to be true in the same period for libburn library (and cdrskin depends on > libburn). The most obvious reason for this is that cdrskin is still not using > all of libburn options, and that libburn development is much more complicated > then the one of cdrskin itself, altought even cdrskin development isn't without > it's problems. I would say that they either really ought to be in separate tarballs, each with their own version number, or the version numbers sync'd up. Two differently versioned components in a single tarball is just plain confusing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 19:20:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271920.k7RJKv0g001058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-27 15:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > ... Ah, and your changelog entry refers to cdrtools instead of cdrskin. [...] > Looks like the only thing to fix is the duplication of the libburn header files. I presume just drop them > from libisofs-devel. Well, not the only thing, I'd fix the ref in the changelog too. :) /me goes off to play video games with son... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 19:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203205] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271938.k7RJcEB7001839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203205 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-08-27 15:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Is this supposed to build on FC5? No, I don't think the source will even compile against 3.1.2. Sorry I should have been clear about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 19:55:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608271955.k7RJt9iu002324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-08-27 15:55 EST ------- Did I miss something? I added the gtk-update-icon-cache as shown on the wiki to %post and %postun. Did you mean something else? %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 20:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272000.k7RK0c7x002488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-games-list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-27 16:00 EST ------- Everybody / anybody I'm cc-ing fedora-games-list as it looks like this package is going to be reviewed if you have any doubts, really any at all about the legal status of this package please speak up now, before it gets approved, imported and build! (In reply to comment #7) > 1. The URL: tag appears to point to an old site, as the latest version on this > site is 1.1.10 and the source location is different. I feel http:// > www.nongnu.org/crack-attack/ would be a better choice. > Fixed > 2. No use of %{name}-%{version} macros in Source tag. Personal preference but > just a heads up if you prefer to use them. > Missed those in the old specfile I inhereted, fixed. > 3. Several files are installed in the %doc directory which probably shouldn't > be there: > > *.sanitize: The patch backup files > crack-attack.6: An uncompressed copy of the man page, but the man page is > correctly installed in %{_mandir}/man6/ > crack-attack.xml: Really a 'source' file for generating the man page so I > wouldn't install it. > ready_to_release: Useless to the end user IMHO and shouldn't be installed. > Woops, fixed, thanks! > 4. /usr/share/crack-attack/crack-attack.desktop and /usr/share/crack-attack/ > crack-attack.xpm, do these files really need to be there? The .xpm is needed and I've used the .desktop as the .desktop and installed it with --delete-original. New version with all this fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crack-attack.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crack-attack-1.1.14-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 20:04:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272004.k7RK4KhP002665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-08-27 16:04 EST ------- the gtk cruft is not needed for kde packages http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda states "For KDE, just 'touch'ing the top-level icon directory is enough." there is no need to discusss this it is perfectly acceptable to not have the gtk stuff in kde packages. gtk-update-icon-cache is not part of the freedesktop.org specs and really doesn't belong in any spec see bug #170335 for more info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 20:10:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272010.k7RKAPRG002863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-27 16:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > Did I miss something? I added the gtk-update-icon-cache as shown on the wiki > to %post and %postun. Did you mean something else? My bad, it looks like the adviced scriptlets have changed. Thus the package is fine as is. Once I sponsor you I'll approve it and you can import it. Please select a second package for me to review and to get an idea of how familiar you are with FE's guidelines (this one went smotth, but had a bit of a head start). (In reply to comment #38) > the gtk cruft is not needed for kde packages > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > > states "For KDE, just 'touch'ing the top-level icon directory is enough." > > there is no need to discusss this it is perfectly acceptable to not have the gtk > stuff in kde packages. > For kdebase maybe, but for KDE packages which also are show in the gnome applications menu it must still be there. since kdiff3 is shown in the gnome applications menu, the update icon cache is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 20:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272012.k7RKCVD5002963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-27 16:12 EST ------- The correct URL is SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice-17-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 20:48:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272048.k7RKmCKt004093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-08-27 16:48 EST ------- All fixes verified so as far as I'm concerned the package is APPROVED! Of course, feel free to wait a while before import & build for any reasonable objections from fedora-games-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:01:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204258] New: Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204258 Summary: Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/mousepad/mousepad.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/mousepad/mousepad-0.2.6-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Mousepad is a text editor for Xfce based on Leafpad. The initial reason for Mousepad was to provide printing support, which would have been difficult for Leafpad for various reasons. Although some features are under development, currently Mousepad has folowing features: * Complete support for UTF-8 text * Cut/Copy/Paste and Select All text * Search and Replace * Font selecton * Word Wrap * Character coding selection * Auto character coding detection (UTF-8 and some codesets) * Manual codeset setting * Infinite Undo/Redo by word * Auto Indent * Multi-line Indent * Display line numbers * Drag and Drop * Printing NOTE: mousepad is included in the upcoming Xfce 4.4, but it builds fine with the existing Xfce 4.2 in devel/fc5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:07:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272107.k7RL70bo004676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-27 17:06 EST ------- * Sun Aug 27 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.2-3.20060823svn - don't install dupe headers in -devel packages - libisofs requires libburn devel for directory ownership http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libburn/libburn.spec http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libburn/libburn-0.2-3.20060823svn.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:29:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] New: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: Project manager for gEDA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:30:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177414] Review Request: geda - project manager for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272130.k7RLUYed005175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - project manager for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177414 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-27 17:30 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204259 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:30:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272130.k7RLUkmS005192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-27 17:30 EST ------- *** Bug 177414 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:40:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272140.k7RLeLvw005501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-27 17:40 EST ------- Ralf or Patrice: Do either of you intend to formally review this package? If not, I would be happy to start in on a formal review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:40:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272140.k7RLelxe005536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-27 17:40 EST ------- Hey Paul. I see only this one submission from you in bugzilla, so it's kinda hard to know if you are ready to be sponsored. Can you take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Adding some review comments to other bugs to show you know the guidelines, as well as submitting a few more packages would help a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:46:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272146.k7RLkj7W005725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-27 17:46 EST ------- Please do. I don't know how much time I have, so I'll do some testing if I have time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 21:49:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272149.k7RLnCqd005767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk 2006-08-27 17:49 EST ------- I have every intention of sorting it out. Time, however, is a little lacking currently. Duncs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 22:00:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272200.k7RM00M0006003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-08-27 17:59 EST ------- New upstream version: Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/libmtp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/libmtp-0.0.15-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 22:03:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272203.k7RM3IJa006228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-27 18:03 EST ------- Excellent. I just wanted to make sure you didn't miss that it had been approved. :) If you require any assistance at all, feel free to drop me a email or catch me on irc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 22:10:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] New: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: This package contains a bunch of symbols of electronic devices used by gschem, the gEDA project schematic editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 22:11:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177109] Review Request: geda-symbols - symbol repository for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272211.k7RMBZaP006610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - symbol repository for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177109 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-27 18:11 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204263 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 22:11:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272211.k7RMBk02006628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-27 18:11 EST ------- *** Bug 177109 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 23:12:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272312.k7RNCQUA007946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-27 19:12 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: cd29a876b34a7dd76555e9acd8f160bb ntop-3.2.tgz cd29a876b34a7dd76555e9acd8f160bb ntop-3.2.tgz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. - Should build in mock. See below - Should have sane scriptlets. Issues: 1. Oddly the web site ( http://www.ntop.org/ ) doesn't mention the sourceforge src download. It points only to their CVS repository for getting the source. Is the sourceforge download official for upstream? Perhaps just a bug in their download page on the web site? They do mention in the CVS FAQ file: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/n/nt/ntop/ 2. Doesn't build under mock/devel. The libpcap BuildRequires should be libpcap-devel ? (Note that this changed between fc5 and devel) 3. Why the post and postun calls to ldconfig? If ntop does dlopen directly on the .so files, there should be no need to call ldconfig. Also, if that is the case perhaps the .so files shouldn't be polluting libdir? I removed the non versioned files and ntop starts fine, so I think we can remove: /usr/lib/libntop.so /usr/lib/libmyrrd.so /usr/lib/libntopreport.so 4. rpmlint says: E: ntop non-standard-uid /var/ntop ntop E: ntop non-standard-dir-perm /var/ntop 0775 Those can be ignored. W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntop.so W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libmyrrd.so W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntopreport.so I think those can be removed. W: ntop mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Cosmetic, but would be nice to fix up. E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/fcUtils.c E: ntop-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ntop-3.2/globals- structtypes.h Permissions on those files should be 644? 5. There is currently nothing in the plugins directory. Do you intend to ship no plugins at all? 6. You need to run ntop "manually" the first time to set the password. Would there be some way to detect this in the init script and print a warning and tell the user exactly what they need to run? 7. Starting up after setting the password results in: /sbin/service ntop start Starting ntop daemon: Processing file /etc/ntop.conf for parameters... Sun Aug 27 16:54:45 2006 NOTE: Interface merge enabled by default Sun Aug 27 16:54:45 2006 Initializing gdbm databases NOTE: --use-syslog, no facility specified, using default value. Did you forget the =? [ OK ] Can that be redirected to the log or /dev/null? init scripts shouldn't print verbose information to the starting console. 8. Instead of removing the .a files you could just pass '--disable-static' to configure. Possibly also enable: --enable-snmp ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 23:50:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272350.k7RNoh1w009016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-27 19:50 EST ------- * Among the rpmling warning there is: W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntop.so W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libmyrrd.so W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntopreport.so I think those files shouldn't be shipped. * Seems like you removed too much in the plugins directory, there aren't plugins anymore... I propose something along for file in %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins/*.so; do if test -L $file; then base=`basename $file .so` mv %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins/$base-%{version}.so $file fi done The proper fix should be done upstream, by changing, for each plugin: libicmpPlugin_la_LDFLAGS = -shared -release @PACKAGE_VERSION@ @DYN_FLAGS@ into libicmpPlugin_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version @DYN_FLAGS@ Strangely, -shared doesn't seems to be a libtool option. It is certainly unneeded. * there are still bad perms, that should be fixed in %setup: chmod -x docs/ntop-autotools.pdf *.c *.h plugins/*.c * --enable-tcpwrap should be replaced by --with-tcpwrap * you could add to the configue call: --disable-dependency-tracking * there is still a dependency on logrotate missing * some doc files are missing: README in source directory, and in docs: 1STRUN.txt, KNOWN_BUGS, README, FAQ*, BUG_REPORT some shouldn't be packaged (INSTALL, CONTENTS) * during the first run with -t 5, I get: Mon Aug 28 01:31:32 2006 [MSGID0026798] **WARNING** ASN: Unable to open file 'AS-list.txt' Also ntop cannot be interrupted during that first run: hitting ctrl-C does nothing while ntop is prompting: Please enter the password for the admin user: I can kill ntop from another console but then the first one is broken * there is still lun 28 ao? 2006 01:36:52 CEST [MSGID0757670] **WARNING** Message is '/usr/lib/ntop/plugins/libxmldumpPlugin.so: undefined symbol: gdome_doc_documentElement' Otherwise it seems to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 27 23:58:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608272358.k7RNwTO9009207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-27 19:58 EST ------- 2 other remarks: ntop segfaults when interrupted by ctrl-C when launched on the console. in /var/ntop many files belong to root. I don't know if it is right or wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 00:02:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280002.k7S02NBV009434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-27 20:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > W: terminus-font-x11 dangerous-command-in-%preun rm > > Why remove those files? Hello, Hans: You have to take a "%ghost file" method. i.e. In install stage: touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.dir etc In file entry: %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.dir etc ... and get rid of rm command from %preun entry (I think that the whole %preun stage is unnecessary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 00:55:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280055.k7S0t0Wh010848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 02:21:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280221.k7S2LdHs012905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-08-27 22:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > - libisofs requires libburn devel for directory ownership Personally, I don't see a huge problem with multiple packages laying claim to a directory, not sure what the official stance on this is. It'd allow you to only install libisofs-devel without having to install libburn-devel, but how much we really care about being able to do that, I dunno. One minor thing, you used %mainver for that added Requires:, right below another Requires: that uses %version. No biggie though, everything else is golden. My name is Jarod Wilson, and I APPROVE this package. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 02:59:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203964] Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280259.k7S2xacj014332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-27 22:59 EST ------- Wheee! I was thinking that cdrskin version had been set by then and would be used. Silly me. This extra version stuff is fun (: I don't want there to be two packages owning the libburn include dir, perhaps upstream could be convinced at some point to drop libisofs.h into a libisofs folder instead of a libburn folder... (hint hint (: ) Package imported and built for development. Branch requested for FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 03:42:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280342.k7S3gT1G015580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-27 23:42 EST ------- Updated to latest upstream release: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis-0.5.9-1.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 03:45:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280345.k7S3jT38015746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-27 23:45 EST ------- Updated to address MUSTFIX items from comment #2: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/libmodelfile-0.1.92-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/libmodelfile.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 04:59:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280459.k7S4xi6W017924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 05:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280550.k7S5oKZG019810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-28 01:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Sure we could split libri2rib into a seperate RPM, but I'm not convinced it's > worth the effort at this point since it doesn't like as though it is usable > outside of aqsis at all. Works by me. Ok, so the package builds under mock for me, but rpmlint complains: [build at zeus aqsis]$ rpmlint aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm W: aqsis incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1-1 1.0.1-2.fc6 W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libbake2tif.so.0.0.0: File format not recognized E: aqsis binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aqsis/libdisplay.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libgif2tif.so.0.0.0: File format not recognized W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libjpg2tif.so.0.0.0: File format not recognized W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libpcx2tif.so.0.0.0: File format not recognized W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libppm2tif.so.0.0.0: File format not recognized W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libtga2tif.so.0.0.0: File format not recognized W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/libslpp.so.0.0.0: File format not recognized E: aqsis shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/libslpp.so.0.0.0 W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/bake.h W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/DPProctext.h W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/patterns.h W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/noises.h The headers sound like they should be there (comment #1); the first warning is an easyfix (needs a changelog entry). The rpath error needs to be dealt with; the objdump errors may be related to that I ran rpmlint against them on my fc5 system (anyone know an easy way to install rpmlint in a mock chroot?), but there's some additional funkiness in build.log: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/aqsis-1.0.1 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libargparse.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libaqsistypes.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libcodegenvm.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/librib2.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/librib2ri.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/librib2stream.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libslparse.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libshadervm.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libraytrace.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libslpp.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libri2rib.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libslxargs.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/aqsis/libdisplay.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/aqsis/libgif2tif.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/aqsis/libjpg2tif.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/aqsis/libppm2tif.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/aqsis/libpcx2tif.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/aqsis/libtga2tif.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/aqsis/libbake2tif.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libddmanager.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libaqsis.so.0.0.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/aqsl extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/aqsltell extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/aqsis extracting debug info from /var/tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/teqser cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/aqsis/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/aqsl/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/aqsltell/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/display/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libaqsistypes/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libaqsistypes/posix/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libargparse/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libcodegenvm/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libddmanager/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libraytrace/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libri2rib/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/librib2/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/librib2ri/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/librib2stream/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libshaderexecenv/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libshadervm/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/libslxargs/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/render/: No such file or directory cpio: aqsis-1.0.1/teqser/: No such file or directory 7653 blocks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 06:02:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280602.k7S62bkw020170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-28 02:02 EST ------- I see there's an examples directory/script, but it's not included in %doc. Let's include that, and this package is approved. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + source files match upstream: 68bddc5e2c32d9748ae689f398fc1147 File-NFSLock-1.20.tar.gz 68bddc5e2c32d9748ae689f398fc1147 File-NFSLock-1.20.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (5/x86_64) + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-File-NFSLock-1.20-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(File::NFSLock) = 1.20 perl-File-NFSLock = 1.20-1.fc5 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=161, 42 wallclock secs ( 0.69 cusr + 0.82 csys = 1.51 CPU) + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 06:52:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280652.k7S6q2QW022122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-28 02:51 EST ------- Ok, the CLA is now accepted. I've added myself to the cvsextras group, so feel free to approve that. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 08:17:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280817.k7S8Hm1Z027412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 04:17 EST ------- examples added with chmod -x: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-File-NFSLock-1.20-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 08:24:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280824.k7S8O5vl027838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 04:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > examples added with chmod -x: Wrong url, it is http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-File-NFSLock-1.20-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 08:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608280851.k7S8pnwK029815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 10:33:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281033.k7SAXCZs003478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-28 06:33 EST ------- I will review this package. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * rpmlint issue ( also * Exclusion of Static Libraries ) - W: ngspice devel-file-in-non-devel-package \ /usr/lib/ng-spice-rework/libbsim4.a This static archive should be removed unless there is a reason that this must be installed. (Try if this package works well with this archive removed.) * Compiler flags - This package does not accept Fedora specific compilation flags and debuginfo rpm is useless. Fix Makefile or the environment of "make" invocation to use Fedora specific compilation flags. (See build log). 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * shared library files - Does this package require to call ldconfig? This package does not have any shared libraries in default paths. 3. Other things I have noticed : * Spec file cosmetic issue - I think that %{_mandir}/man1/ngnutmeg.1* is more preferable than %{_mandir}/man1/ngnutmeg.1.gz . * File entry - /usr/share/doc/ngspice-doc-17/doc/ngspice.info* and /usr/share/info/ngspice.info* may be duplicate. Check if both of these are needed. * Mock issue - Ah... I don't know how to use this package at all!! However, I watched some URL and tried: $ cat > rc.cir < plot v(2) Then I installed ngspice with rebuilt in mock, I got... [tasaka1 at dhcp151 NGSPICE2]$ ngnutmeg rc.raw ****** ** ngnutmeg-17 : data analysis and manipulation program ** The U. C. Berkeley CAD Group ** Copyright 1985-1994, Regents of the University of California. ** Please submit bug-reports to: ngspice-bugs at lists.sourceforge.net ** Creation Date: Mon Aug 28 04:04:22 EDT 2006 ****** external error: no graphics interface; please check compiling instructions Loading raw data file ("rc.raw") . . . done. Title: Basic RC circuit Name: Transient Analysis Date: Mon Aug 28 19:18:36 2006 ngnutmeg 4 -> plot v(2) Can't open viewport for graphics. ngnutmeg 5 -> and.. when I tried the rpm rebuilt with normal rpmbuild, I got a X window graph (perhaps as expected) So, again, some BR are missing. I attach a full mock build log. The diff I am concerned in is: @@ -189,31 +478,14 @@ checking whether a program can dlopen itself... (cached) yes checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... (cached) yes appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool -checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes -checking whether to build shared libraries... yes -checking whether to build static libraries... yes -checking for f95 option to produce PIC... -fPIC -checking if f95 PIC flag -fPIC works... yes -checking if f95 supports -c -o file.o... yes -checking whether the f95 linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes -checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so -checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate -checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking whether windows code is enabled... no -checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path -checking for gethostbyname... yes -checking for connect... yes -checking for remove... yes -checking for shmat... yes -checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes -checking for main in -lXaw... yes -checking for main in -lXmu... yes -checking for XShmAttach in -lXext... yes -checking for bison... bison -y -checking for flex... flex -checking for yywrap in -lfl... yes -checking lex output file root... lex.yy -checking whether yytext is a pointer... yes +checking for X... no +checking for bison... no +checking for byacc... no +checking for flex... no +checking for lex... no +checking for yywrap in -lfl... no +checking for yywrap in -ll... no checking for pid_t... yes checking return type of signal handlers... void checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes @@ -295,7 +567,7 @@ checking readline/history.h usability... yes checking readline/history.h presence... yes checking for readline/history.h... yes -checking for library containing tputs... -lncurses +checking for library containing tputs... -ltermcap checking for readline in -lreadline... yes BSD editline disabled. configure: creating ./config.status @@ -447,12 +719,7 @@ checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E -checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path -checking for gethostbyname... yes -checking for connect... yes -checking for remove... yes -checking for shmat... yes -checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes +checking for X... no checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 10:38:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281038.k7SAccsb003860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-28 06:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135036) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135036&action=view) Build log of ngspice-17-1 with normal rpmbuild Build log of ngspice-17-1 with normal rpmbuild. You can see the Fedora specific compilation flags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is not passed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 10:40:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281040.k7SAemPT003998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-28 06:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135037) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135037&action=view) Mock build log of ngspice-17-1 Mock build log of ngspice-17-1. Please compare this with the previous build of (with normal rpmbuid) to find the missing BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 11:42:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281142.k7SBgJpr007702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-28 07:42 EST ------- OK, you are now sponsored. Import pulseaudio into cvs, and mark this as Resolved->NextRelease when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 12:20:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281220.k7SCKv0s009676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-28 08:20 EST ------- FYI, PyQt4 doesn't build against qt4-4.2 (yet), so don't bother trying to build on/for fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 12:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281224.k7SCOERL009867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-28 08:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.0.1-3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Aug 28 2006 Rex Dieter 4.0.1-3 - BR: qt4-devel < 4.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 13:20:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281320.k7SDKlvY012881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-08-28 09:20 EST ------- just to clarify: orca is replacing both gnopernicus and gnome-mag, right ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 14:35:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281435.k7SEZ3rX017908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-28 10:34 EST ------- Here's the review: 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines, however, I'd like to see some reasoning why /usr/libexec/gnustep is used instead of %{_libdir}/gnustep and, similarly, %{_datadir}/gnustep/Libraries instead of %{_libdir}/gnustep/Libraries 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. 3. dist tag is present. 4. build root NOT correct, should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 5. license field matches the actual license. 6. license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. 7. source files match upstream: 1883a6387405e51ff4c384fb5cc547a7 gnustep-make-1.12.0.tar.gz 8. latest version is being packaged. 9. BuildRequires are proper. 10. package builds in mock (fc5,devel). 11. rpmlint shows errors, but they can be ignored, as discussed in comment #1: E: gnustep-make non-executable-script /usr/share/gnustep/makefiles/executable.template 0644 E: gnustep-make non-executable-script /usr/share/gnustep/makefiles/java-executable.template 0644 12. final provides and requires are sane: config(gnustep-make) = 1.12.0-5.fc6 gnustep-make = 1.12.0-5.fc6 = /bin/csh /bin/echo /bin/sh config(gnustep-make) = 1.12.0-5.fc6 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) 13. no shared libraries are present. 14. package is not relocatable. 15. owns the directories it creates. 16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. 17. no duplicates in %files. 18. file permissions are appropriate 19. %clean is present. 20. %check is not necessary. 21. no scriptlets present. 22. code, not content. 23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. 24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. 25. no headers. 26. no pkgconfig files. 27. no libtool .la droppings. 28. not a GUI app. 29. not a web app. To summarize: all seems fine except 1. and 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 14:54:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281454.k7SEskiH019563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 15:04:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281504.k7SF4lko020643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-08-28 11:04 EST ------- Note that we plan on replacing esound in FC7 with pulseaudio. pulseaudio is supposed to be some kind of drop-in replacement to esound. So for < FC7 we need pulseaudio to co-exist without conflicting or removing esound, but FC7 we need to design a smooth upgrade path for both the sound server and packages that currently depend on it by name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 15:34:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281534.k7SFYadw023742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-28 11:34 EST ------- Reviewing: This package is almost okay. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * BuildRequires: pkgconfig can be removed because glib2-devel requires pkgconfig and gtk2-devel (this is written) requires glib2-devel . * Summary and description (This is a suggestion) Could you explain this package (geda) more concretely on Summary ? Perhaps you can use the description on http://www.geda.seul.org/ . 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : - Okay. 3. Other things I have noticed : Well, again I don't know how to use this package. However, as far as I can tell now, if I type "geda &" a gtk-2 application window is popped up and it seems okay. The requirements of this package makes no difference between the one rebuilt with normal rpmbuild and the one rebuilt in mock. I would appreciate it if you can attach a simple test case by which I can check if this package work well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 15:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281538.k7SFcKE4024229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-28 11:38 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 15:53:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281553.k7SFrPPm025340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-08-28 11:53 EST ------- Yes it does. I need to add teh obsolete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:01:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281601.k7SG1YwM026014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From brent at linux.wku.edu 2006-08-28 12:01 EST ------- This says fixed in 5, but I don't see this package either in Core or Extras. Am I not looking in the correct location or did it never get built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:05:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281605.k7SG5QDD026480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-28 12:05 EST ------- Still owns %datadir/pixmaps. %description still says Gstm instead of gSTM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281609.k7SG9iX9026645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-28 12:09 EST ------- Hello Mamoru, thanks for reviewing my packages. Geda is a suite of Electronic Design Automation tools. Hence it consists of several packages which all can be accessible by the Geda package (this package 204259) itself. I haven't packaged all of them yet, once done, ill file bug for each and set "related depends on". This explains why the items on the 'tool' menu are not working. I'll ping you once ready ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:19:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281619.k7SGJs0Z027663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:20:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281620.k7SGKrCk027784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-28 12:20 EST ------- + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + source files match upstream: 6934be7ffe351b3eea844d24a07ebc36 Heap-0.71.tar.gz 6934be7ffe351b3eea844d24a07ebc36 Heap-0.71.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (5/x86_64). + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Heap-0.71-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Heap) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Binary) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Binomial) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Elem) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Elem::Num) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Elem::NumRev) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Elem::Ref) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Elem::RefRev) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Elem::Str) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Elem::StrRev) = 0.71 perl(Heap::Fibonacci) = 0.71 perl-Heap = 0.71-1.fc5 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Heap::Fibonacci) perl(strict) perl(vars) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:33:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] New: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: scott at perturb.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Built rpms on 3 FC5 boxes all come up clean. rpmlint is happy on both the SRPM and the binary rpm. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Spec URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook-0.3.2-2.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook.spec Description: QComicBook is a viewer for comic book archives: rar, cbr, zip, cbz, ace, cba,tar.gz, cbg, tar.bz2, cbb. QComicBook aims at convenience and simplicity. Features include: automatic decompression, full-screen mode, two pages mode, japanese mode, thumbnails view, page scaling and rotating, page preloading and caching, mouse or keyboard navigation, bookmarks etc. QComicBook requires zip/unzip, rar/unrar, tar with gzip+bzip2 support and unace to handle archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:35:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281635.k7SGZvCd029427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-08-28 12:35 EST ------- So what's next? All I want to do is get this package in the extras tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:44:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281644.k7SGimBY030233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-28 12:44 EST ------- So it will be moved into core then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:47:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281647.k7SGlD3B030653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-28 12:47 EST ------- Per Warren's comment, I'd venture -> Core sometime after FC-6 release and before FC-7. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 16:58:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281658.k7SGwwxK031802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-08-28 12:58 EST ------- This package can't require unrar, since it is not allowed into FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:04:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281704.k7SH4h7T032457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-28 13:04 EST ------- You need sponsorship. The best way to do that is submit a couple of packages then those who have the power to do so can correctly evaluate if you understand the packaging rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:13:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281713.k7SHDDS0000653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-08-28 13:13 EST ------- Good catch... Updated and reposted. SRPM: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook-0.3.2-3.src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:17:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281717.k7SHHEU9000946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-08-28 13:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > So what's next? All I want to do is get this package in the extras tree. And qcomicbook? :-) You can also do reviews. This is explained in Comment #13, Comment #15, and http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored If you'd like, I can unassign this bug and you can seek someone else on fedora-extras to sponsor you. They'll probably review qcomicbook and look at this bug to judge how knowledgable you are and then decide if they want you to do reviews or anything else to show your knowledge. Your call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:17:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281717.k7SHHQY6000982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-28 13:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Geda is a suite of Electronic Design Automation tools. Hence it consists of > several packages which all can be accessible by the Geda package (this package > 204259) itself. Well, then this package is something like the "central package" of Geda related packages, I can think? Then it might be preferable that the explanation of Geda is included in this package, however, this is a suggestion and is up to you. > > I haven't packaged all of them yet, once done, ill file bug for each and set > "related depends onment". > > This explains why the items on the 'tool' menu are not working. > > I'll ping you once ready ok? Okay. However, it may take time for me to review all your packages only by myself... Anyway, the left points for this package is very few as I mentioned in the comment #2 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281719.k7SHJRSA001097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-08-28 13:19 EST ------- I'd prefer not to do reviews, I'm not sure if my knowledge is ready for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281728.k7SHSL4p001965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-08-28 13:28 EST ------- Couple of quick items (note this is not an official review): 1. Desktop file is not handled correctly. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 2. In the build section you should use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' instead of '%{__make}' 3. The Requires on qt & imlib2 are unnecessary since the sonames on the devel packages will pull these in. 4. You should use 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' instead of '[ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"' in your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:32:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281732.k7SHWmGJ002389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 17:51:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281751.k7SHp5VA003759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-08-28 13:51 EST ------- Updated the package with the comments in #3. rpmlint is clean on the SRPM and the binary RPM. SRPM: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook-0.3.2-4.src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 18:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281804.k7SI4Euc004605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-08-28 14:04 EST ------- Does this current version co-exist with esound without causing conflicts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 18:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281808.k7SI8MsF004901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 18:21:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281821.k7SILwC1006240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-28 14:21 EST ------- Better with the libdir fix, but still needs some work: - Missing a %defattr entry for devel package - Source0 is 404, looks like you want http://go-mono.com/sources/mono-debugger/mono-debugger-0.30.tar.gz - don't disable debug, there is debugging symbols. - license is not LGPL, looks like MIT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 18:42:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281842.k7SIgYk5008500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-08-28 14:42 EST ------- No direct conflicts no. Only one can have the local socket though of course. There aren't really any ways pulse can conflict with esound, apart from replacing "esd" with the esdcompat script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 18:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281853.k7SIrjlY009974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(johnp at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-28 14:53 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - python_sitelib isn't used, don't define it. - Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") is no longer needed. Automagically done. - Summary could lose "Orca is a", and the period at the end. - description should have 80char~ linefeeds - Missing BR: perl(XML::Parser) gnome-python2-bonobo gettext - Does orca provide a 'drop in replacement' for gnopernicus? Should it Provides: gnopernicus for upgrade paths? (ditto gnome-mag) - Group listed isn't a standard group from the RPM docs. - Some of the BuildRequires lines have tabs, some have spaces. Pick one (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 19:08:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281908.k7SJ89bx011388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-28 15:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec Fixes all from #15 - tar ball is the same -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 19:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281922.k7SJMCAb012938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-28 15:21 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice-17-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 19:33:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608281933.k7SJXcjb014027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-28 15:33 EST ------- rpmlint is not clean on the srpm - all warnings strange-permission jokosher 0755 3 patches not applied (patch0, 1, 2) invalid-licence (not worried about this one as discussed before - also applies to the rpm) mock does, indeed, build cleanly The URL you have above for the spec file is invalid. Looking at the spec file I have some concerns 1. Why have you got patches in the install section - they should be in prep. You can also make them easier on the eye by using %patch0 -p1 and that's it! 2. You need to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python?highlight=%28python%29 as the python packaging guides have changed. It means %ghost has gone (amongst other things) 3. I can't allow install -p -m 0755 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}. All binaries have to be from the package itself and not just dragged from some random website or other - the possibility for interception and security problems is boundless like that. If you need a file (such as patch) you bundle it with the srpm, this is then installed happily into the SOURCES directory when the srpm is installed. 4. The line mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name} is not required. It's automatically created by the next mkdir line down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 20:39:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282039.k7SKdw4x019402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-28 16:39 EST ------- Okay, this builds happily in mock, rpmlint is clean and I'm happy with the IPv6 statement in #27 Review time... Comment... %package selinux Requires(post): /usr/sbin/ Should be %{_sbindir} really, it's not a blocker though as you've used /usr/sbin throughout. Needs work %files all the %{_bindir} files can be globbed %{_bindir}/cy* You don't have a %files devel (that I can see) yet you have the subpackage defined in the spec. Good Everything else! No dupes in the rpms build The software works Spec file complies with the packaging guidelines Permissions correctly set rpmlint clean mock builds fine (i386) Has fallback if selinux is not available/enabled md5sums correspond Consistent use of macros throughout Fix the needs work section and I'm happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 21:30:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282130.k7SLUWYe023237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-28 17:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135088) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135088&action=view) New spec file Sorry had to put the new spec file here, but I can't seem to upload at the moment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 21:35:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282135.k7SLZ5fO023885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(james.antill at redha | |t.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-28 17:35 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - home_base_url is used exactly once. Why not just use it in Source0? - No URL tag - glibc-kernheaders package doesn't exist anymore. The new package name is kernel-headers. Kernel-headers provides glibc-kernheaders, but might as well use the new name. - Description starts with a space - setup should have -q flag for quiet. - Package does not build currently: INFO: entering directory libnetlabel/ ... CC netlabel_init.o In file included from netlabel_init.c:39: /builddir/build/BUILD/netlabel_tools-0.16/include/linux/netlabel.h:42:1: warning: "NLMSG_HDRLEN" redefined In file included from netlabel_init.c:38: /usr/include/linux/netlink.h:74:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from netlabel_init.c:39: /builddir/build/BUILD/netlabel_tools-0.16/include/linux/netlabel.h:45: error: redefinition of 'struct nlattr' In file included from netlabel_init.c:39: /builddir/build/BUILD/netlabel_tools-0.16/include/linux/netlabel.h:64:1: warning: "NLA_HDRLEN" redefined In file included from netlabel_init.c:38: /usr/include/linux/netlink.h:131:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition make[1]: *** [netlabel_init.o] Error 1 make: *** [libnetlabel] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 21:41:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282141.k7SLfMm3024944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-28 17:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135090) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135090&action=view) monodebug-configure patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 21:42:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282142.k7SLgYP5025077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-28 17:42 EST ------- build fails memory.c:69:23: error: linux/sys.h: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 21:44:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282144.k7SLiXPr025172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-28 17:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > ==== MUST ==== > - I could not get source package from Source URL, I had to use: > http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/worldforge/libmodelfile-0.1.92.tar.gz > (not sure why) But Source0 should be updated accordingly I've had mixed results using the various different forms of SF download URLs. It all depends on which mirror you happen to hit when you download the file. > - Have you tested this in FC4? If you plan to support FC4 please test, > BuildRequires might be different (might need xorg-x11-devel or something) I don't plan to support FC4 or FC5 for any of the WorldForge packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 22:22:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169974] Qalculate - A multi-purpose desktop calculator for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282222.k7SMMJKh027593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Qalculate - A multi-purpose desktop calculator for GNU/Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169974 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 18:21 EST ------- Maybe this shouldn't block Bug #170296? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 22:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168574] Review Request: perl-Convert-ASN1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282223.k7SMND9N027670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-ASN1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168574 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 18:22 EST ------- Perhaps this shouldn't block Bug #168607? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 22:24:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166504] Review Request: python-numarry - Python array manipulation and computational library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282224.k7SMOeu2027741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-numarry - Python array manipulation and computational library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166504 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 18:24 EST ------- Perhaps this shouldn't block Bug #166503? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 22:26:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282226.k7SMQB1a027843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-28 18:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Needs work > > %files > > all the %{_bindir} files can be globbed > > %{_bindir}/cy* Done. > You don't have a %files devel (that I can see) yet you have the subpackage > defined in the spec. The -devel subpackage isn't needed. I've removed the devel subpackage declaration. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis-0.5.9-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/cyphesis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 22:36:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168607] Review Request: perl-Convert-PEM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282236.k7SMaVHr028608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-PEM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168607 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|168574 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 22:59:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177249] Review Request: jrtplib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282259.k7SMxf2w029986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jrtplib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177249 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 18:59 EST ------- What is happening to that request? There seems to be nothing in owners.list and in repo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:01:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282301.k7SN1nUO030116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 19:01 EST ------- What is happening to that request? There seems to be nothing in owners.list and in repo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:03:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] New: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/libtelepathy.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/libtelepathy-0.0.31-1.src.rpm Description: The Telepathy project aims to provide a unified framework for all forms of real time conversations, including instant messaging, IRC, voice calls and video calls. It uses the DBus messaging system to provide a simple interface for client applications, allowing them to quickly benefit from Telepathy's functionality. libtelepathy is a glib library to ease writing telepathy clients. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:06:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] New: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-gabble.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-gabble-0.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: The Telepathy project aims to provide a unified framework for all forms of real time conversations, including instant messaging, IRC, voice calls and video calls. It uses the DBus messaging system to provide a simple interface for client applications, allowing them to quickly benefit from Telepathy's functionality. telepathy-gabble is a Jabber/XMPP connection manager, that handles single and multi-user chats and voice calls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:11:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282311.k7SNBvpj030611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-28 19:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > 1) I read the steps about "Import of complete src.rpm packages" (it's my > case), so I ask you to check how I want to proceed: It is not a "complete src.rpm packages", it is an update of a package allready in the cvs repository. > * My package is named ss5 (ss5-3.5.9-1.src.rpm) and is under Devel/FC-4/Fc-5 > branch; > * I am releasing new version of ss5 (ss5-3.6.1-1.src.rpm), so: > > export CVSROOT=:ext:USERNAME at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras > export CVS_RSH=ssh > > cvs co ss5 No need to do that > a ... > b ./cvs-import.sh -b -m "ss5 updated to 3.6.1-1" ~/rpmbuild/SRPM/ss5- > 3.6.1-1.src.rpm That's not the recommended way. The recommended way is to make new-sources FILES="new-tarball.tgz" modify specfile cvs commit (this should commit the change in sources). As I said above it is covered in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:18:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282318.k7SNInvu030892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-08-28 19:18 EST ------- This package has *not* yet been approved for FE. It is still stalled waiting on a review of the package at the location posted in comment 35 to be done by K12LTSP folks. I've just about given up on anyone actually reviewing it, and if noone responds by the next time I think to check this bug, I'll just close it since there doesn't seem to be any interest in reviewing/approving it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:43:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] New: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kdetv.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kdetv-0.8.9-1.src.rpm Description: kdetv is a KDE application that allows you to watch television on your GNU/Linux box running KDE. You probably know it as QtVision, the completely rewritten version of KWinTV. Note: rpmlint warnings about dangling symlinks can be ignored, as they point to files in another package. I also think the warnings about devel files in non devel package can also be ignored because KDE often seems to requite the .so and .la files (although I may be wrong :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:49:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] New: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libstroke-0.5.1-6.src.rpm Description: LibStroke is a stroke interface library. Strokes are motions of the mouse that can be interpreted by a program as a command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 23:56:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608282356.k7SNucwD032336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-08-28 19:56 EST ------- Thanks for the review! About 1. > 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines, however, I'd like to see some > reasoning why /usr/libexec/gnustep is used instead of %{_libdir}/gnustep and, > similarly, %{_datadir}/gnustep/Libraries instead of %{_libdir}/gnustep/Libraries libexec is chosen because the parts placed in there are called by parts of gnustep-make, e.g. which_lib. The choice about FHS'izing gnustep-make is a bit arbitrary since upstream hasn't yet properly addressed this, but most parts are derived from mail exchanges between gnustep-make authors and ogo authors. datadir instead of libdir is chosen because there is nothing arch-dependent in there. About 4. > 4. build root NOT correct, should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) This is the "preferred buildroot" which is not a must-buildroot. This issue was brought up some time ago in the packaging group and consensus was mostly, that if it works it passes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 00:42:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177249] Review Request: jrtplib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290042.k7T0gpFn001261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jrtplib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177249 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-28 20:42 EST ------- Thanks for reminding me! Imported and built for FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 00:43:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177249] Review Request: jrtplib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290043.k7T0hUxA001285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jrtplib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177249 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 00:48:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165779] Review Request: kasumi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290048.k7T0mvrO001416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kasumi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165779 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |UPSTREAM OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 00:49:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204210] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290049.k7T0nSqx001458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF - Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204210 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-08-28 20:49 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 00:57:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165779] Review Request: kasumi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290057.k7T0vFvn001685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kasumi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165779 ------- Additional Comments From ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net 2006-08-28 20:57 EST ------- I'm sorry for a bit confusing package request. - Firstly, I requested to import Kasumi into Extras. That time, SCIM is just a package of Extras. - Later, SCIM was moved into Core. That time, Kasumi has not yet been reviewed so that it's just imported into Core. There is no need for importing it into Extras anymore. - I have to close this post, but I've forgot to. That's my fault, I'm sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 01:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165779] Review Request: kasumi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290121.k7T1L1EB002842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kasumi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165779 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 02:03:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290203.k7T23Vuo004317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-08-28 22:03 EST ------- I had hoped that someone actually using this in K12LTSP would confirm that it works exactly as they are used to. The upstream K12LTSP is not a drop-in replacement for the K12LTSP version. Unfortunately, it seems that K12LTSP lacks a development community and relies too heavily on Eric Harrison to just hand them a solution. I cannot prioritize analyzing this myself, and holding it indefinitely doesn't seem to be a good solution either, so let's just let it publish and see if anybody screams. It will need to be fixed after the fact then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 02:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290224.k7T2OIiq005376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-08-28 22:24 EST ------- ACK - will build in mock to reconfirm that it builds, then push it to FE 5/devel normally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 02:56:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189004] Review Request: irsim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290256.k7T2uEA6007844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189004 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-28 22:56 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 04:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290458.k7T4wNN3014456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 00:58 EST ------- Review for libgeda: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * BuildRequires - pkgconfig is not needed because: glib2-devel requires pkgconfig and gtk2-devel (written) requires glib2-devel - added texi2html as BR to set HTML file creation enabled However, no HTML documents are installed and I cannot see the place where /usr/bin/texi2html is used in build log. Is texi2html needed? * Requires - -devel package. Check precisely the Requires of -devel package as the requirement of -devel package cannot be pulled automatically. /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgeda.pc says: Libs: -L${libdir} -lgeda -pthread -lguile -L/lib -lglib-2.0 \ -L/lib -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 ...... This means that this package (libgeda-devel) requires guile-devel, glib2-devel, gtk2-devel, ....... Add all these requirement, then remove redundant packages. For example, glib2-devel is requires by gtk2-devel, so explicit requirement of "glib2-devel" is not necessary. * Scriptlets requirements Add /sbin/ldconfig to main Requires(postun) . 2. Fro http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : 3. Other things I have noticed: * %exclude %{_libdir}/libgeda.la Well, finally %{_libdir}/libgeda.la is not installed, so remove this file on %install stage (rm -f $BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la) and get rid of this entry. * %doc Why do main and -devel packages have the same documents? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 05:01:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204439] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204439 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-SimpleDBI/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI-1.12-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI.spec Description: This module works its magic by creating a new session with POE, then spawning off a child process to do the "heavy" lifting. That way, your main POE process can continue servicing other clients. Queries are put into a queue, and processed one at a time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 05:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204439] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290502.k7T522TA014633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204439 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 05:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166317] Review Request: perl-X11-Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290538.k7T5celf016022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-X11-Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166317 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-29 01:38 EST ------- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 05:43:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204163] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290543.k7T5h7IF016257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 06:07:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 02:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204163] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290607.k7T67pfY017134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-29 02:07 EST ------- Package is missing a couple BR's, but is good aside from that :) For the purposes of the review I'm assuming they're in there. Missing: perl(URI::WithBase) ...for testing: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage), perl(Test::Pod) These are the only blockers. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + source files match upstream: 77a18dd8ad57d2443827b2458b7e78dd HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.06.tar.gz 77a18dd8ad57d2443827b2458b7e78dd HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.06.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. O package builds cleanly in mock with additional BR's (5/x86_64) + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.06-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(HTML::FormatText::WithLinks) = 0.06 perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks = 0.06-1.fc5 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder) perl(URI::WithBase) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=62, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.46 cusr + 0.48 csys = 1.94 CPU) + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 06:13:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 02:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178142] Review Request: Jakarta Commons CLI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290613.k7T6DUas017384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jakarta Commons CLI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178142 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com chabotc at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 06:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 02:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176653] Review Request: python-sqlite2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290614.k7T6Ewns017513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlite2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176653 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com chabotc at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 06:33:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 02:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290633.k7T6XS5R018303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2006-08-29 02:33 EST ------- fine. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 07:36:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194054] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290736.k7T7aZrt021416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194054 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 03:36 EST ------- It seems to me that this bug shouldn't block Bug #178904, and also that it could be better as a duplicate of Bug #178900, but that's not a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 07:45:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290745.k7T7jHAx022057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 03:45 EST ------- Second review: * rpmlint issue: - Well, will you check rpmlint issue before updating srpm and spec file, please? This time mock build is okay (except for one problem), however: E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/include/mif.h E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/evt/evtload.c E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cm/cmexport.c E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cm/cmmeters.c E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/mif/mif_inp2.c E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/include/enh.h E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cmpp/read_ifs.c ...... (continues) ....... ... perhaps this is due to permission issue. Change permissions of \*.{c,h,y,l} to 0644. E: ngspice-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cm/cmevt.c Perhaps cmevt.c has Windows-like end-of-line encoding. Try: %{__sed} -i -e 's|\r||' to get rid of this error. * BuildRequires: - compat-gcc-32-gc77 is unnecessary. This package does not use g77 when rebuilt. I could succeed in rebuilding without this package. Also, FC-6 devel doesn't have compat-gcc-32-g77 . - xorg-x11-proto-devel is required by libX11-devel. - libXmu-devel is required by libXaw-devel . - libXt-devel is required by libXaw-devel. - flex, bison, libtool Check if these packages are really needed. For me, mock build succeeds without these and the rebuilt packages seems functionally okay for the test case in the comment #2. * Exclusion of Static Libraries: - Well, %{_libdir}/ng-spice-rework/libbsim4.a seems unnecessary. So, remove this on %install stage by rm command and get rid of the use of %exclude. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 07:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170296] Review Request: qalculate-kde - qt gui frontends to qalculate In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290751.k7T7psi6022468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qalculate-kde - qt gui frontends to qalculate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170296 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|169974 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 08:55:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165892] Review Request: xsupplicant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290855.k7T8tiUI027399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsupplicant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165892 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 04:55 EST ------- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 08:55:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166208] Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290855.k7T8tq6R027437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166208 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 04:55 EST ------- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 08:55:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166966] Review Request: jam : Program construction tool, similar to make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290855.k7T8twDE027476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jam : Program construction tool, similar to make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166966 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 04:55 EST ------- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 08:55:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165485] Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290855.k7T8tvbt027468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165485 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 04:55 EST ------- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 09:01:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165892] Review Request: xsupplicant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290901.k7T91Xfp028032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsupplicant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165892 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jamatos at fc.up.pt ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 05:01 EST ------- Assignee fixed, closing again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 09:01:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165485] Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290901.k7T91S36028020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165485 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jamatos at fc.up.pt ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 05:01 EST ------- Assignee fixed, closing again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 09:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166208] Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290901.k7T91ZM3028051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166208 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jamatos at fc.up.pt ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 05:01 EST ------- Assignee fixed, closing again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 09:08:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290908.k7T98jQb028412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 09:13:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290913.k7T9DP7H028640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 manuel at todo-linux.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 09:21:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290921.k7T9LqEj029068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 05:21 EST ------- Actually this package allready exists in fedora extras cvs. But in the spec there is Build disabled. Package is without maintainer and has never been built before. The cvs log explains that this is a fire and forget package that was never built, and the devel branch has been disabled. I did a resurection request at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded This let you time to assign yourself to that bug ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 09:26:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204163] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608290926.k7T9Q4Lv029273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 05:26 EST ------- New srpm available - added BuildRequires for tests http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.06-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:05:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183694] Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291005.k7TA5wiV032516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:06:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180164] Review Request: muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291006.k7TA6An2032540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180164 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Bug 180164 depends on bug 183694, which changed state. Bug 183694 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:06:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291006.k7TA6hHK032588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181824 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:07:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183694] Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291007.k7TA7kP3032642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bugs.michael at gmx.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:08:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180164] Review Request: muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291008.k7TA8IG7032685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180164 Bug 180164 depends on bug 183694, which changed state. Bug 183694 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:40:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166758] Review Request: qps - visual process status monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291040.k7TAelAa001993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qps - visual process status monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166758 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166409] Review Request: gajim - jabber client written in PyGTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291041.k7TAfCGl002072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gajim - jabber client written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166409 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166588] Review Request: openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291042.k7TAgDVS002214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166588 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:56:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] New: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kita.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kita-0.177.3-3.src.rpm Description: Kita is a 2ch client for KDE. -------------------- Note: Details of 2ch are on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2channel >From en wikipedia: 2channel is thought to be the largest Internet forum in the world. With over 10 million visitors every day (as of 2001), it is gaining significant influence in Japanese society, approaching that of traditional mass media such as television, radio, and magazines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 10:59:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291059.k7TAx9g3003331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 06:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135118) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135118&action=view) Mock build log of kita-0.177.3-3 This package can be rebuilt in mock cleanly. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 11:31:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196635] Review Request: knetworkmanager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291131.k7TBVYmM005432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knetworkmanager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196635 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 11:32:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196635] Review Request: knetworkmanager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291132.k7TBW3To005481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knetworkmanager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196635 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 11:32:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196635] Review Request: knetworkmanager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291132.k7TBWMOl005507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knetworkmanager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196635 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE CC|rdieter at math.unl.edu | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 11:54:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291154.k7TBsa7j006885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 07:54 EST ------- I'm stuck with my patch, which I found useless ! Normally lidgeda requires libgdgeda as BR I want to make libgeda to require libgd.so.2 instead, because there isn't much difference between gd and libgdgeda. But I simply can't find the proper place to patch it :( Could you please point it to me ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 12:03:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291203.k7TC32Hu007350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 08:02 EST ------- Built in devel. Thanks for the review. I don't plan on doing a FC5 release except if somebody asks for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 12:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291204.k7TC4V1b007441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-29 08:04 EST ------- Wojciech Kazubski who was working on geda for FE previously already wrote a patch for this, see: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1479983&group_id=161080&atid=818428 (unfortunatly the lines got wrapped, so it won't apply unless you fix this) Here is a better version without the lines wrapped: http://archives.seul.org/geda/dev/Apr-2006/msg00076.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 12:17:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291217.k7TCHBQ7008214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-29 08:17 EST ------- Did the packager get sponsored ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 12:37:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291237.k7TCbrqo009576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 08:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135122) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135122&action=view) file lists of geda-symbols First review. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Timestamps - Well, it seems this package has many text files. So preserving timestamps is very desirable. Try to change "make install" option so that (perhaps) most files can keep timestamps. In xscreensaver case (I maintain xscreensaver), I use make INSTALL="install -p" install Check if this package accepts such options, or, if not, change Makefile so that install command is used with -p option. * File and Directory Ownership - %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme %{gedadocdir}/man I don't know why these empty directories needs to be included in this package. Usually if other packages install some files in these directories, it is the package which should own these directories, not this package. However, * if you aim to sumbit other packages and * the packages install some files in that directories and * the packages surely requires this package, these directories can be owned by this package. Let me know your opinion about these directories. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : okay. 3. Other things I have noticed : - Consider if /usr/share/gEDA/docs can be moved to usual document files' location, i.e. /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-%{version} - I will attach the file entry of geda-symbols rebuilt in mock. Please check if all files you want to install in this package are correctly packaged. --------------------- BTW, could you review my package (bug 204461) ? Again, this package is aimed for Japanese users...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 12:43:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291243.k7TChLjr009898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #135122|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:05:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183097] Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291305.k7TD5B49011053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183097 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:06:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183097] Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291306.k7TD6A1H011125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183097 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-29 09:06 EST ------- Assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:08:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291308.k7TD8Jce011321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181013 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:09:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291309.k7TD9GQT011407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181013 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-29 09:09 EST ------- Assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291324.k7TDOC9V012311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 09:24 EST ------- I've included 2 patches: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda-20060123-4.src.rpm As you can see it has been patched correctly + echo 'Patch #0 (libgeda-20060123-arc.patch):' Patch #0 (libgeda-20060123-arc.patch): + patch -p0 -b --suffix o_arc_basic.c -s + echo 'Patch #1 (libgeda-20060123-configure.patch):' Patch #1 (libgeda-20060123-configure.patch): + patch -p0 -b --suffix configure.ac -s + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.81346 + umask 022 but sounds like not: GLIB library version: 2.11.1 GTK+ library version: 2.9.1 GUILE library version: 1.6.7 libgdgeda (png output): no mingw build: no data directory: /usr/share/gEDA rc directory: /usr/share/gEDA LIBGEDA .so version: 25:0:0 dmalloc debugging: no ElectricFence debugging: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:41:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202398] Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291341.k7TDfGE1013669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-29 09:41 EST ------- Thanks for the review... sorry for the late acknowledgement. Imported into CVS and built.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:46:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291346.k7TDk9KT013977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-08-29 09:46 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23.1-1.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Aug 28 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.23.1-1 - Update to 0.23.1 * Thu Aug 24 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.23-5 - Include a README.fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 13:56:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291356.k7TDukFx014584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2006-08-29 09:56 EST ------- To my knowledge I have not yet been sponsored. If there's something I need to do for this please point me in the right direction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:03:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291403.k7TE34ZO015018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 10:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135132) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135132&action=view) No-mock build log of libgeda (changed) Well, do you mean that you want the following result of configure (as attached in this comment)? config.status: creating docs/Makefile config.status: creating libgeda.pc config.status: creating scripts/geda_totexi config.status: creating scripts/notangle_guile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing geda_totexi-chmod commands config.status: executing notangle_guile-chmod commands ** Configuration summary for libgeda 20060123: GLIB library version: 2.12.2 GTK+ library version: 2.10.2 GUILE library version: 1.8.0 gdlib (png output): yes 2.0.33 mingw build: no data directory: /usr/share/gEDA rc directory: /usr/share/gEDA LIBGEDA .so version: 25:0:0 dmalloc debugging: no ElectricFence debugging: no + make -j3 make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgeda-20060123' Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgeda-20060123/src' make all-am make[3]: Entering directory `/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgeda-20060123/src' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291408.k7TE8Wgm015726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 10:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135133) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135133&action=view) spec file used on the above comment. spec file I used for the comment #7 . No patch is applied. Note: I have not checked yet by mock. However, if this result is suitable for you, again please upload spec and srpm file and I will check it. Note: your patch includes the parameter change of a function. I cannot apply this because I don't know what this means. If the parameter change you included in your patch is necessary, please do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:19:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291419.k7TEJ7mn016730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 10:18 EST ------- Another comment: Check the BR for this package and Requirement for -devel package. For me, normal rpmbuild (i.e. rebuild without mock) WITH GDLIB ENABLED add the Requirement of libX11.so.6 libXpm.so.4 libfontconfig.so.1 ibfreetype.so.6 libjpeg.so.62 libpng12.so.0 libz.so.1 So, maybe libX11-devel, libXpm-devel, ...... are missing for BR. And this changes /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgeda.pc . With mock build. it says Libs: -L${libdir} -lgeda -pthread -lguile -L/lib -lglib-2.0 -L/lib -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -L/lib -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 But with normal build (and WITH GDLIB ENABLED) /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgeda.pc says Libs: -L${libdir} -lgeda -pthread -lguile -L/usr/lib -lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm -L/lib -lglib-2.0 -L/lib -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -L/lib -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:32:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291432.k7TEWOAI018114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 10:32 EST ------- shouldn't this directory be owned as well : %{_datadir}/apps/kita/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:41:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291441.k7TEfMl9019076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:41:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291441.k7TEfiEE019167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 Bug 185951 depends on bug 186327, which changed state. Bug 186327 Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:42:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195692] Review Request: guichan - Portable C++ GUI library for games using Allegro, SDL and OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291442.k7TEg66q019224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guichan - Portable C++ GUI library for games using Allegro, SDL and OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195692 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:43:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291443.k7TEh8YU019339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-29 10:42 EST ------- No need for Requires(post,postun): %{_bindir}/update-desktop-database Requires(post,postun): %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache Per the ScriptletSnippets wiki, no need to add dependancies for these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:43:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291443.k7TEhuHq019392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-29 10:43 EST ------- Reassigning to me as part of some bugzilla cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291444.k7TEiJlm019432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 Bug 185951 depends on bug 186327, which changed state. Bug 186327 Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:45:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195692] Review Request: guichan - Portable C++ GUI library for games using Allegro, SDL and OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291445.k7TEjcIJ019552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guichan - Portable C++ GUI library for games using Allegro, SDL and OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195692 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-29 10:45 EST ------- Reassigning to me as part of some bugzilla cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:50:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291450.k7TEoHKY019933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 10:50 EST ------- To the comment #2 : You mean that this package SHOULD NOT own the directory? If you mean that this package SHOULD, it is already because %{_datadir}/apps/kita/ equals to %dir %{_datadir}/apps/kita/ %{_datadir}/apps/kita/* This directory is used only by this package, so owning this package is necessary. To comment #3 : Why? %post and %postun uses these commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:51:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291451.k7TEpCP1020046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Try to change "make install" option so that (perhaps) > most files can keep timestamps. In xscreensaver case (I maintain > xscreensaver), I use > > make INSTALL="install -p" install > > Check if this package accepts such options, or, if not, It accepts "-p" ::) make INSTALL="install -p" install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} > > * File and Directory Ownership > > - %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme > %{gedadocdir}/man > > I don't know why these empty directories needs to be > included in this package. > 3. Other things I have noticed : > > > - Consider if /usr/share/gEDA/docs can be moved > to usual document files' location, i.e. > /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-%{version} > Actually geda-gsymbols are required by geda-gschem geda-gsymcheck geda-doc geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-utils. And all these are required by geda which is a suite. (though i haven't YET included them as Requires in the geda package) Hence these act as a centralised repository for geda. > - I will attach the file entry of geda-symbols rebuilt in > mock. Please check if all files you want to install in > this package are correctly packaged. Yes, everything is included :) luckily Updated: SPEC: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols-20060123-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:51:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291451.k7TEpaMu020091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-29 10:51 EST ------- So requested :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:53:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204163] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291453.k7TErOSR020297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-29 10:53 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 14:56:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291456.k7TEuXG7020719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-29 10:56 EST ------- > Why? %post and %postun uses these commands. They need not necessarily be present at install-time, hence the presence of ||: at the end of each command. For more details, please read the ScriptletSnippets wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:11:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291511.k7TFBbI9022030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 11:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Actually geda-gsymbols are required by geda-gschem geda-gsymcheck geda-doc > geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-utils. > And all these are required by geda which is a suite. (though i haven't YET > included them as Requires in the geda package) > > Hence these act as a centralised repository for geda. > Okay. Now this package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:20:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291520.k7TFK9wb022651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 11:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > Why? %post and %postun uses these commands. > > They need not necessarily be present at install-time, hence the presence of ||: > at the end of each command. For more details, please read the ScriptletSnippets > wiki. Okay. I removed those. spec, srpm are updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kita.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kita-0.177.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:24:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204493] New: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mozilla-DOM/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Mozilla-DOM-0.20-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Mozilla-DOM.spec Description: This module wraps the Mozilla DOM interface in Perl. In conjuction with an embedded Gecko widget (e.g. Gtk2::MozEmbed), you can use Perl to manipulate the browser DOM, handle DOM signals, and create events such as mouse clicks -- all within a Mozilla-like browser (so it also does JavaScript). See `perldoc Mozilla::DOM` for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:24:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291524.k7TFOcNa023088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:25:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204494] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-MozEmbed/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.06-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.spec Description: This module allows you to use the Mozilla embedding widget from Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:26:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204494] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291526.k7TFQAWw023312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204493 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:26:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291526.k7TFQBYE023316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204494 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:26:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188440] Review Request: dispatcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291526.k7TFQQHY023345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dispatcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188440 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-29 11:26 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:27:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] New: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/GStreamer/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GStreamer-0.09-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GStreamer.spec Description: GStreamer makes everybody dance like crazy. It provides the means to play, stream, and convert nearly any type of media -- be it audio or video. GStreamer wraps the GStreamer library in a nice and Perlish way, freeing the programmer from any memory management and object casting hassles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:27:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291527.k7TFRRxT023467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204497] New: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204497 Summary: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://squentin.free.fr/gmusicbrowser/gmusicbrowser.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gmusicbrowser-0.955-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gmusicbrowser.spec Description: Fast jukebox for large collections of audio files. Uses gstreamer or format-specific apps for playback. Main features: - artist/album lock : easily restrict playlist to current artist/album - easy access to related songs (same artist/album/title) - fully featured tag editor - simple mass-tagging and mass-renaming - support multiple genres for each song - customizable named 'flags' can be set for each song - filter history in the browser window - filters with unlimited nesting of conditions - customizable weighted random mode -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:28:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204497] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291528.k7TFSpod023566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204497 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204494, 204495 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204494] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291529.k7TFT361023595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204497 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291529.k7TFT3gI023591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204497 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:33:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291533.k7TFXqos024028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(johnp at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-08-29 11:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca-0.9.0-2.src.rpm I changed the Groups tag but I belive there should be an accessability group as it is an important segment that we must support. Having the group makes our support that much more visible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:34:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291534.k7TFYlwn024184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-29 11:34 EST ------- All of this: if [ -d %{_prefix}/lib64 ] ; then SUF=64 else SUF= fi for f in %{_prefix}/lib$SUF/qt-* ; do QTDIR=$f done ... --with-qt-libraries=... Can be omitted, and put this in before calling %configure: unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh which will setup the QT env. vars automatically/appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:38:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291538.k7TFcMis024661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-29 11:38 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Normally the reviewer who approved the package is responsible for sponsoring you. Is Adrian Reber awol ? Adrian ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:45:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291545.k7TFjsle025697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-29 11:45 EST ------- Details, details... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291551.k7TFp6mh026445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 15:56:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291556.k7TFuMbL026897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-29 11:56 EST ------- Another update. The recent FC5 selinux-policy package update has split out a separate selinux-policy-devel package, as per FC6. So the buildreqs are now the same for FC5 and FC6 onwards. Packages (1.10-6) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 16:00:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204502] New: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204502 Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: pknirsch at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pknirsch/FC/xosd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pknirsch/FC/xosd-2.2.14-8.fc6.src.rpm Description: XOSD displays text on your screen, sounds simple right? The difference is it is unmanaged and shaped, so it appears transparent. This gives the effect of an On Screen Display, like your TV/VCR etc.. The package also includes an xmms plugin, which automatically displays various interesting things as they change (song name, volume etc...) We have it working here on several laptops and it's really nice to have. Read ya, Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 16:03:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204502] Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291603.k7TG3Dpj027407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204502 pknirsch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Red Hat Enterprise Linux | |Beta Version|devel |5.0.0 Component|Package Review |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 16:04:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204502] Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291604.k7TG40uG027488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204502 pknirsch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 16:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291609.k7TG92VW027830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(johnp at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-29 12:08 EST ------- Actually the Group tag is used by NOTHING. Anaconda doesn't use it, pirut doesn't use it, yum doesn't use it, etc... It's actually on the chopping block to go away. Comps.xml is where the things get sorted into groups and presented as such. Hrm, looks like I missed it in the first review. Summary is more than 79 chars, it needs to be shortened. Could probably drop everything from 'for people' on, and caps the first word. Thats silly stuff you can fix once you import. Approving. I'm assuming that at the same time I should be blocking gnopernicus and gnome-mag from the collection (and removing from comps if its there)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 16:13:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291613.k7TGDSg1028054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(johnp at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-08-29 12:13 EST ------- Yes block away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 16:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291619.k7TGJehL028428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 12:19 EST ------- One remark (not a blocker), test.patch could be named with the package name prepended. * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, licence included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 4f6f27edded250b00055d076eb738ff5 GStreamer-0.09.tar.gz * sane provides (with the known insane GStreamer.so) Provides: GStreamer.so perl(GStreamer) perl(GStreamer::Caps) perl(GStreamer::Install::Files) * %files section right I tried to test using player.pl in examples, but it doesn't seems to work. Or maybe I am missing something: $ perl /usr/share/doc/perl-GStreamer-0.09/examples/player.pl /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Playing: /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Resource not found. at /usr/share/doc/perl-GStreamer-0.09/examples/player.pl line 21. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 16:54:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291654.k7TGsiLl029121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 12:54 EST ------- however with this spec file: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda.spec It fails checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... checking for gdlib_LIBS... configure: error: Package requirements (gdlib >= 2.0.15) were not met. Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively you may set the gdlib_CFLAGS and gdlib_LIBS environment variables to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66151 (%build) RPM build errors: compared to yours, checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... checking for gdlib_LIBS... -lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm checking for X... libraries , headers checking for gethostbyname... yes checking for connect... yes even though I don't feel it requires libgd.so.2 in yours too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 17:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291731.k7THVbI1031628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Can be omitted, and put this in before calling %configure: > unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh > > which will setup the QT env. vars automatically/appropriately. Well, configure seems to accept QTLIB. Again updated so as to call qt.sh : http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kita.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kita-0.177.3-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 17:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291742.k7THgW7Q032597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |196802 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-29 13:42 EST ------- While I don't have time at the instant moment to check to see if 16MB is enough to install this package with, I'm going to mark this bug as depending on bug 196802. (Definitely something we should validate however -- would solve a lot of the "bad feelings" I get contemplating overriding a core php.ini value.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 17:46:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291746.k7THklY0000531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 13:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > however with this spec file: > http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda.spec > > It fails > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... > checking for gdlib_LIBS... > configure: error: Package requirements (gdlib >= 2.0.15) were not met. > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > installed software in a non-standard prefix. > > Alternatively you may set the gdlib_CFLAGS and gdlib_LIBS environment variables > to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for > more details. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66151 (%build) > > > RPM build errors: > > compared to yours, > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... > checking for gdlib_LIBS... -lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 > -lz -lm > checking for X... libraries , headers > checking for gethostbyname... yes > checking for connect... yes > > > even though I don't feel it requires libgd.so.2 in yours too > So it means that this package don't have to libgd.so.2 , but have to use libXpm.so.?, libX11.so.?, .... etc. Also, "lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm" is returned by "gdlib-config --libs". gdlib-config is included in gd-devel, so you cannot compile without gd-devel when my change applied. You seems to have commented out the requirement of gd-devel. If so this package cannot be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 17:48:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204513] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amlai at columbia.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.columbia.edu/~amlai/xcalc/xorg-x11-xcalc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.columbia.edu/~amlai/xcalc/xorg-x11-xcalc-1.0.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A simple x11 calculator The program xcalc disappeared in FC5. A number of individuals have been looking for it. The source is from X11R7.0. rpmlint reports W: xorg-x11-xcalc invalid-license MIT/X11 However, this is consistent with the rest of the xorg packages in Core. This is my first package and I will need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 17:49:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204513] Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291749.k7THnB6R000732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 amlai at columbia.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 18:14:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291814.k7TIERGp002798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-08-29 14:14 EST ------- Yeah, let's block on that. I've added the hacks to create a temporary local php.ini in %post and %postun, but that's a horrible hack. I'd rather wait until PHP moves out of 1996, when 8M was considered a lot for a process. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 18:16:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291816.k7TIGXB9003033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 james.antill at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2006-08-29 14:16 EST ------- All the changes to the packaging that you requested have been done (same spec file URL). The .src.rpm now passes rpmlint on a rawhide system[1]: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools.spec http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools-0.16-4.src.rpm [1] Actually it warns the specfile is 600, but it's correct in the tar archive (before I create the .src.rpm) so I don't see how to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 18:23:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291823.k7TINYoI006884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 14:23 EST ------- > You seems to have commented out the requirement of gd-devel. If so this package cannot be built. It's to test it under mock Updated: SPEC: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda-20060123-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 18:23:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291823.k7TINhLV006919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2006-08-29 14:23 EST ------- Nevermind, I fixed the specfile thing too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 18:27:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291827.k7TIRVli007942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-08-29 14:27 EST ------- Since this isn't blocked by the ImageMagick/libpng screwiness anymore is there an eta on approval. I'd love to see Tango goodness on my desktop without hand compiling it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 18:35:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291835.k7TIZ8LU010736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-29 14:34 EST ------- The main holdup is that Piotr FE_NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:01:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291901.k7TJ1s1G014424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-29 15:01 EST ------- Ok, that's weird. Works for me: [cweyl at zeus ~]$ perl /usr/share/doc/perl-GStreamer-0.09/examples/player.pl /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Playing: /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Artist: Aleksi AUBRY-CARLSON Title: Album: Track number: 0 My system is a (mostly ) stock fc5/x86_64 system, with all updates. Is yours a devel/fc6tX box? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:13:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] New: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm Description: The Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) allows developers to take an existing application model and quickly create a rich graphical editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:19:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291919.k7TJJPVK015787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 15:19 EST ------- Yep it is devel, i386. The requires seem right: $ rpm -q --requires perl-GStreamer libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgstreamer-0.10.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1 perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Glib) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) I have gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.9-4 gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.4-1.fc6 gstreamer-devel-0.10.9-2 gstreamer-tools-0.10.9-2 gstreamer-0.10.9-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:20:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291920.k7TJKQgX015861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-08-29 15:20 EST ------- Warren, I hope you don't mind, but I updated to the latest version and made some other changes: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey/sqlgrey.spec http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey-1.7.4-1.src.rpm AFAIK, the only major issue left is that the init script is extremely broken. I'm going to try to work on that right now. Oh, and I'm inclined to completely drop the upstream changelog. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:26:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291926.k7TJQDaA016436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-08-29 15:26 EST ------- Thanks Steven, I haven't been able to prioritize working on this. Would you like to take over ownership? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:31:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291931.k7TJVP5S016862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 15:31 EST ------- Ok, a strace shows that it tries to open localhost/usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Changing the scipt a bit such that it doesn't call Glib::filename_to_uri and constructing the uri myself, it works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:46:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291946.k7TJksIS018174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:49:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291949.k7TJn8Gj018345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 15:49 EST ------- In fact gstreamer doesn't resolve an uri like file://localhost/usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg to /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Not sure that it is a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 19:57:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608291957.k7TJvIeN018808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 15:57 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice-17-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:02:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292002.k7TK2nGE019150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-29 16:02 EST ------- rpmlint has the following complaints. I think it should be easy to clean them all up. Let me know if you have questions about them. Also, spelling error: "demostrates". I have other questions as well, but let's start with these: [root at berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) W: eclipse-gef macro-in-%changelog java_home W: eclipse-gef mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs [root at berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) W: eclipse-gef no-documentation W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%post /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:05:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292005.k7TK5RO4019270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-08-29 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > In fact gstreamer doesn't resolve an uri like > file://localhost/usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg > to /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg > Not sure that it is a bug. It is, from RFC 3986 section 3.2.2: "For example, the "file" URI scheme is defined so that no authority, an empty host, and "localhost" all mean the end-user's machine [...]" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:07:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292007.k7TK7Eil019415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:07:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292007.k7TK7mg4019486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 Bug 198089 depends on bug 195221, which changed state. Bug 195221 Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:07:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292007.k7TK7m4o019498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 Bug 195222 depends on bug 195221, which changed state. Bug 195221 Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:08:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292008.k7TK86uY019536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204538 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-29 16:08 EST ------- Build successfuly in fc5 mock. It's a bug in kernel-headers in devel (missing sys.h). Filed bug #204538. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292008.k7TK8MWD019585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 Bug 195223 depends on bug 195221, which changed state. Bug 195221 Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:08:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292008.k7TK8LLe019573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 Bug 198088 depends on bug 195221, which changed state. Bug 195221 Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:10:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292010.k7TKA2bm019735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-08-29 16:09 EST ------- Sorry updated the wrong bug. There are now links to the latest srpm http://xfs.org/~cattelan/xfsdump.spec http://xfs.org/~cattelan/xfsdump.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:21:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292021.k7TKLU3G020731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-29 16:21 EST ------- Is it sufficient to fix the others, but leave the two warnings for csound-java? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:26:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292026.k7TKQ9EQ021166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-08-29 16:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Also, spelling error: "demostrates". Oops. Fixed. > [root at berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > Environments (IDE) > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > These are obviously not errors. The groups thing is wrong AFAIK since nothing's been standardized and that's what we're using for Eclipse itself and Subclipse just got approved with it. > W: eclipse-gef macro-in-%changelog java_home > W: eclipse-gef mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Fixed. > W: eclipse-gef no-documentation Hmm. I don't know what to do about this one. The doc plugins are in the -sdk sub-package. > W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%post /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db > W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db Fixed. Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:47:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292047.k7TKlnHk022846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-29 16:47 EST ------- All right then, I'm satisfied. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 20:49:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292049.k7TKnFqs022961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 21:17:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292117.k7TLH8Di024753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jamatos at fc.up.pt OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 17:16 EST ------- I will review this package. One question before starting, why do we need automake? # for the aclocal directory Requires: automake I am aware that automake is not as bad as autoconf, or is the other way around... ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 21:22:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292122.k7TLMM9l025156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 17:22 EST ------- It is for the aclocal directory detection which is done by calling aclocal which is part of automake. Moreover /usr/share/aclocal/ is in that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 21:33:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292133.k7TLXo4J025777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-29 17:33 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. ******* kdelibs-devel already requires qt-devel, libacl-devel, libart_lgpl-devel, arts-devel, pcre-devel, zlib-devel chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpm -qR kdelibs-devel /bin/sh arts-devel bzip2-devel fam-devel kdelibs = 6:3.5.4-0.1.fc5 libacl-devel libart_lgpl-devel libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libidn-devel libjpeg-devel libqt-mt.so.3 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libtiff-devel libxslt-devel openssl-devel pcre-devel qt-devel >= 1:3.3.6 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 zlib-devel ******* - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. This package lookss good to me. Clean the BR, then I'll approuve it afterwards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 21:42:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292142.k7TLgIMe026644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2006-08-29 17:42 EST ------- Ok, again, and this seems to fix the mock bugs... http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools.spec http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools-0.16-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 21:53:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292153.k7TLrNA6027658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(james.antill at redha| |t.com) | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-08-29 17:53 EST ------- Builds, passes rpmlint, provides/requires look good, I'm going to pass this. Go ahead and request access to cvsextras and I'll approve it (as I'm sponsoring you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 21:55:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292155.k7TLtgOZ027903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-08-29 17:55 EST ------- You are right, my mistake. The issue I was addressing relates with automake as BuildRequires and not Requires. I was wrong, apologies for that. Here I get: $ rpm -qf /usr/share/aclocal/ libXaw-devel-1.0.1-1.2 automake-1.9.6-2 and $ rpm -q --requires libXaw-devel libXaw = 1.0.1-1.2 libXmu-devel rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 xorg-x11-filesystem >= 0.99.2-3 So it seems that libXaw-devel is claiming /usr/share/aclocal/ wrongly. I should probably fill this as a packaging bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 22:32:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292232.k7TMWb6r029394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-29 18:32 EST ------- Is it a bug of gstreamer or perl-GStreamer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 23:19:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292319.k7TNJoMU031668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-08-29 19:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks Steven, I haven't been able to prioritize working on this. Would you > like to take over ownership? Sure. One more question... There doesn't appear to be an explicit dependency on postfix in this package. Should there be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 23:46:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608292346.k7TNkZw6000339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-08-29 19:46 EST ------- Oops, yes. =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 23:49:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] New: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jafo-redhat at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns-2.3.0-1.noarch.rpm Description: Another Python DNS library, this one is based on Guido's original code, updated by Anthony Baxter. It is required for the PySPF package. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 29 23:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] New: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jafo-redhat at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf-1.7-1.noarch.rpm Description: A Python library for doing SPF (Sender Policy Framework) lookups. This depends on python-pydns (just submitted). This is my second package, I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 00:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300017.k7U0HnhQ001361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 Bug 203662 depends on bug 204538, which changed state. Bug 204538 Summary: linux/sys.h is missing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204538 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 01:15:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300115.k7U1FwVL003108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 21:15 EST ------- Closing as it seems that geda-symbols is released under FE-5, FE6-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 01:25:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300125.k7U1P560003577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-29 21:24 EST ------- Well, not for reviewing issue. however: I use firefox and when I click the right button on your http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice.spec , choose "open the link in the new tab" (translated into Japanese), firefox always try to save this spec file as "file type BIN file" (in Japanese). However, when I do the same thing on http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/rpm/libgeda.spec , I can browse the spec file on firefox. Anyway, I will check the comment #7 . Do you know what is causing this difference? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 01:36:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300136.k7U1aPoq004015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 01:48:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300148.k7U1mYlW004455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com BugsThisDependsOn| |204560 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-08-29 21:48 EST ------- (Adding bug dependency for the python-pydns review request.) On a brief looking-over, your Source0 should be a full URL to the source tarball (or if that does not make, a brief explanation as to why it is not a full URL as a comment). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 01:48:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300148.k7U1mZZq004463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204561 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 01:56:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300156.k7U1uxDb004715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 jwb at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-08-29 21:56 EST ------- Updated in devel/, FC-[345] branches removed from CVS. Closing this bug / review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 02:10:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300210.k7U2Avtg005135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-29 22:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > [root at berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > > W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > > Environments (IDE) > > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > > These are obviously not errors. The groups thing is wrong AFAIK since nothing's > been standardized and that's what we're using for Eclipse itself and Subclipse > just got approved with it. Do you have a reference to the subclipse review bugzilla? > Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec > Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm Build error... /usr/share/eclipse/readme/readme_gef.html is installed but unpackaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 02:46:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300246.k7U2kKlo006852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-08-29 22:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > [root at berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > > > W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > > > Environments (IDE) > > > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > > > > > These are obviously not errors. The groups thing is wrong AFAIK since nothing's > > been standardized and that's what we're using for Eclipse itself and Subclipse > > just got approved with it. > > Do you have a reference to the subclipse review bugzilla? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 > > Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec > > Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > > Build error... > /usr/share/eclipse/readme/readme_gef.html is installed but unpackaged. Gah, I'm an idiot. Fixed. Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 02:48:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300248.k7U2mE7B006961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python-pydns|Review Request: python-pydns |- Another Pyhon DNS library.|- Another Pyhon DNS library. Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-29 22:48 EST ------- I'd be happy to take a look at this (and pyspf). Your SRPM link seems to be pointing to the noarch instead of the src.rpm... can you provide an updated link? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 02:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300252.k7U2qa2l007264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-29 22:52 EST ------- I'd be happy to take a look at this. In addition to the item from comment #1, the SRPM URL is pointing to the noarch package, not the src.rpm. Update those and I can do a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 03:18:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300318.k7U3ISY2009073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-29 23:18 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. Should the license really be "Python Software Foundation License" and not "Python license" ? a grep in the unpacked source gives: PKG-INFO:License: Python license README.txt:This code is released under a Python-style license. setup.py: license = 'Python license', 2. You should provide a full path to the source in Source0. Perhaps something like: Source0: http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pydns/ pydns-%{version}.tgz 3. You need to own the %{python_sitelib}/DNS/ directory, not just it's contents. 4. rpmlint says: W: python-pydns summary-ended-with-dot Python module for DNS (Domain Name Service). Suggest: remove the . at the end of the summary line. 5. You BuildRequire python-setuptools, according to the python package guidelines ( at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python ), "Python packages that use setuptools need to add python-setuptools as a BuildRequires and must either add --single-version-externally-managed to the line invoking setup.py in %install, or must add a .pth file containing the path to the egg or egg directory to %{python_sitelib}." Should this package do that? Or does it really need python-setuptools at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 04:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300430.k7U4U4F1013261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-30 00:29 EST ------- I tried to come up with some way to clean up the rpmlint warnings from the debuginfo package and I'm out of ideas. Perhaps some expert has a solution, but in the absense of one I'm not going to let that block things. The only thing rpmlint has to complain about is the debuginfo package. Some remaining issues that I've notices while doing the full review: Don't use Distribution:. You don't use the %dist tag in your Release:. It's not mandatory but strongly recommended; if you don't use it, you must be very careful to keep your versions straight across the potentially five different releases that this package will be built for. Really the only blocker is the use of Distribution:; I'll leave the dist tag up to you but remind you to take care if you do not add it, especially with your first FC5 build after you branch as it will have the same version and won't permit you to tag. At this point you should go ahead and request cvsextras membership, and fedorabugs if you want it. I'll approve you and then you'll be able to check in. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#GetAFedoraAccount has details. Review: * source files match upstream: 4e113a39b07723bbb140d2e5c5389cfe xfsdump_2.2.42-1.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). O debuginfo package has problems which aren't easily soluble. O rpmlint has valid but unfixable complaints (-debuginfo package only) * final provides and requires are sane: xfsdump = 2.2.42-1 = attr >= 2.0.0 libattr.so.1()(64bit) libattr.so.1(ATTR_1.0)(64bit) libhandle.so.1()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libuuid.so.1()(64bit) xfsprogs >= 2.6.30 * %check is not present; running upstream test suite is not reasonable. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED, provided you remove Distribution: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 05:05:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204513] Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300505.k7U55soh014519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-08-30 01:05 EST ------- My 2c: why name of package is so ugly? Maybe it would be better to call it just "xcalc"? Look at the xterm package - it calls "xterm", not "xorg-x11-xterm". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 05:25:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300525.k7U5PmaT015042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 01:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135186) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135186&action=view) Mock build log of ngspice-17-3 Okay. 3rd review. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines = rpmlint became silent. * Compiler flags - I checked this again, however, it is not yet okay. My mock build log says: + /usr/bin/make /usr/bin/make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/ng-spice-rework-17' Making all in xgraph make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph' /usr/bin/make all-am make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -MT xgraph.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/xgraph.Tpo" -c -o xgraph.o xgraph.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/xgraph.Tpo" ".deps/xgraph.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/xgraph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -MT xgX.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/xgX.Tpo" -c -o xgX.o xgX.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/xgX.Tpo" ".deps/xgX.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/xgX.Tpo"; exit 1; fi ....... So the compilation in ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph do not accept Fedora specific compilation flags. Check and change Makefile(.in) in ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph so that sources are correctly compiled with Fedora specific compilation flags. 2. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. The other things I have noticed : = Nothing. Please see the build log attached in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 05:30:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300530.k7U5UdEv015142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-30 01:30 EST ------- Somehow I managed to miss your reply. Sorry about that; too much bugzilla mail, I guess. About the unowned directory: here is the set of packages in FC5 (core+extras) which own /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps: HelixPlayer-1:1.0.6-1.2.2.i386 hicolor-icon-theme-0:0.9-2.noarch sound-juicer-0:2.14.4-1.fc5.1.i386 gdm-1:2.14.9-1.i386 fedora-logos-0:1.1.42-1.fc5.1.noarch k3b-0:0.12.15-0.FC5.1.i386 openoffice.org-core-1:2.0.2-5.17.2.i386 rssowl-0:1.2.1-1.fc5.i386 pikdev-0:0.9.1-1.fc5.i386 banshee-0:0.10.8-1.i386 rssowl-0:1.2.1-2.fc5.i386 banshee-0:0.10.9-1..fc5.i386 koffice-core-0:1.5.1-1.fc5.i386 taskjuggler-0:2.2.0-1.fc5.i386 kdirstat-0:2.5.3-3.fc5.i386 amarok-0:1.4.1-2.fc5.i386 amarok-0:1.4.1-3.fc5.i386 koffice-core-0:1.5.2-1.fc5.i386 pikdev-0:0.9.1-2.fc5.i386 sound-juicer-0:2.14.4-1.fc5.1.i386 fedora-logos-0:1.1.42-1.fc5.1.noarch gdm-1:2.14.9-1.i386 k3b-0:0.12.15-0.FC5.1.i386 openoffice.org-core-1:2.0.2-5.16.2.i386 openoffice.org-core-1:2.0.2-5.17.2.i386 Does this package depend, directly or indirectly, on any of those? It doesn't look like it to me. And thus you could install this package and its dependencies and /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps would be unowned, and that's problematic according to the guidelines. I honestly don't know what the proper solution is. Many packages own those directories, but I guess it might also be reasonable to depend on hicolor-icon-theme. Everything else looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 05:34:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204513] Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300534.k7U5YodF015286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 05:39:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300539.k7U5d4ZW015487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-30 01:38 EST ------- Given that 195353 was closed WONTFIX, is there any point in continuing this submission? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 05:59:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204513] Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300559.k7U5xcVf016069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 ------- Additional Comments From amlai at columbia.edu 2006-08-30 01:59 EST ------- I would actually prefer for it to be called xcalc myself, but I named it that way b/c I thought it was consistent with the rest of the xorg-x11 sourced packages. (Oddly enough, it appears that xterm is not an xorg package.) The other problem that I ran into (and if anyone has an idea of how to address this issue), I wanted to make the version number X11R7.0-1.0.1, but that is an illegal version number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300601.k7U61bUA016188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ifoox at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-30 02:01 EST ------- It's been another three weeks. Is anything going to happen here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:02:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300602.k7U629uV016231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 02:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135187) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135187&action=view) Mock build log of libgeda-20060123-5 I only tried to rebuild libgeda-20060123-5 (in the comment #12 ) (, which means that I have not checked about packaging or anything else of this package). I succeeded in rebuilding this in mock........ I attached the build log in mock. Well, now I will check this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:08:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300608.k7U68Gpc016516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-30 02:08 EST ------- I took a look at this package, but I find myself questioning the point behind the lsb, minit and initng subpackages. We have a defined system in Fedora for initscripts and such; I guess I don't see the point in splitting what's certainly going to be required out to a subpackage. Is there any existing daemon that has its initscripts in a subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:09:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178932] Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300609.k7U69pP6016563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AutoScan - A utility for network exploration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178932 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:10:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185325] Review Request: sparse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300610.k7U6AZfP016667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185325 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:12:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185776] Review Request: gitweb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300612.k7U6CWhQ016832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gitweb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185776 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(bkyoung at users.sour | |ceforge.net) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-30 02:12 EST ------- I will close this bug in one week if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:13:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187613] Review Request: sm_tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300613.k7U6DXKY016887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sm_tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187613 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:33:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300633.k7U6Xt6Z017819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-30 02:33 EST ------- It would be nice to document which plugins are expected to work, which aren't, and which need additional modules not available from Extras, but I'm not going to hold this up for something like that. If the problem I found in testing is common and persists with the new version, I'm sure you'll receive plenty of bug reports. All of the blocker issues I found have been addressed. The updated package builds cleanly and rpmlint is silent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:42:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300642.k7U6g9nY018325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 02:42 EST ------- Not worried about the symlink, not happy with the no-soname. However, if it's because the library is a java one masquerading as a real one for some reason, then I'm okay with it. Fix the others and so-name and we're good to go. The biggest killer IMO is the printf redefinition - I'd not allow it through if it's still complaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300643.k7U6hQWM018401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 02:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135188) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135188&action=view) Mock build log of kita-0.177.3-6 (In reply to comment #9) > Clean the BR Ah... Actually anything other than kdelibs-devel desktop-file-utils disappered.... Again I updated spec and srpm. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kita.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kita-0.177.3-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 06:44:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] New: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/atomic/libatomic_ops.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/atomic/libatomic_ops-devel-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Provides implementations for atomic memory update operations on a number of architectures. This allows direct use of these in reasonably portable code. Unlike earlier similar packages, this one explicitly considers memory barrier semantics, and allows the construction of code that involves minimum overhead across a variety of architectures. As most of this library is done in its headers, the ABI isn't considered stable. The package therefore only builds to a devel package, containing headers and static libs. This is also how Debian packages it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 07:06:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300706.k7U76T2N019836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-30 03:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Not worried about the symlink, not happy with the no-soname. However, if it's > because the library is a java one masquerading as a real one for some reason, > then I'm okay with it. It's a JNI library. Nobody ever links against it - it is dlopen'd by the JVM running the java code shipped in this package. Fedora Core/Extras includes many such libraries with no SONAME. This should be OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 07:14:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300714.k7U7Eqx8020061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-30 03:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I honestly don't know what the proper solution is. Many packages own those > directories, but I guess it might also be reasonable to depend on > hicolor-icon-theme. Done. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx-2.2.1-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 08:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300835.k7U8ZHkV025360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|204538 | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-30 04:35 EST ------- According to David, dx is to blame for using a private kernel header. I'll try patching it out of it then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 08:37:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300837.k7U8bvrp025667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Component|Package Review |python-psycopg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 08:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300844.k7U8ixgq026129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-30 04:44 EST ------- Shouldn't the JNI library be in %{_libdir}/java/, or %{_libdir}/java-ext/? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 08:57:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300857.k7U8vsdn027012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 08:57:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300857.k7U8vuH1027038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 09:07:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300907.k7U97Qqn027729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 Bug 196847 depends on bug 196802, which changed state. Bug 196802 Summary: 16M memory needs to be set in pear/pecl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196802 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 09:07:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300907.k7U97Rc8027747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 Bug 201502 depends on bug 196802, which changed state. Bug 196802 Summary: 16M memory needs to be set in pear/pecl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196802 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 09:07:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300907.k7U97cbq027770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 Bug 197411 depends on bug 196802, which changed state. Bug 196802 Summary: 16M memory needs to be set in pear/pecl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196802 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 09:07:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300907.k7U97dIZ027782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 Bug 196837 depends on bug 196802, which changed state. Bug 196802 Summary: 16M memory needs to be set in pear/pecl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196802 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 09:07:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300907.k7U97oOd027801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 Bug 196793 depends on bug 196802, which changed state. Bug 196802 Summary: 16M memory needs to be set in pear/pecl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196802 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 09:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608300947.k7U9li7D030784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-30 05:47 EST ------- Sorry about that. Here's the SRPM: SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns-2.3.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:06:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301006.k7UA6ScD000467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-30 06:06 EST ------- Thanks for the pointers, Kevin. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns-2.3.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:15:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301015.k7UAFrlx001311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 06:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Well, not for reviewing issue. however: > > I use firefox and when I click the right button on your > http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice.spec , > choose "open the link in the new tab" (translated into Japanese), > firefox always try to save this spec file as "file type BIN file" > (in Japanese). > > However, when I do the same thing on > http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/rpm/libgeda.spec , I can browse the spec > file on firefox. > > Anyway, I will check the comment #7 . > > Do you know what is causing this difference? Uploading to googlepages might be the reason, I'll opt for funpic.de as much as I can but forever at funpic i can't upload more that 1.5 mb :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:16:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301016.k7UAGjgM001378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 06:16 EST ------- This package (kita-0.177.3-6) havs been APPROUVED ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:17:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301017.k7UAHhd1001474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:19:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301019.k7UAJc2L001626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-30 06:19 EST ------- I've updated the URL, and have pushed new versions up. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf-1.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:26:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204163] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301026.k7UAQRJX002139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-30 06:26 EST ------- built in devel, FC-5 branch asked, owners.list updated. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:55:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] New: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: Gschem is an electronics schematic editor. It is part of the gEDA project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301056.k7UAuaqJ004105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:56:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301056.k7UAubVG004117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204598 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:56:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301056.k7UAuvgZ004154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|204168 |204423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:57:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301057.k7UAv8uD004186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|204598 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:57:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301057.k7UAveSW004272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204598 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177108] Review Request: geda-gschem - schematic editor for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301059.k7UAxM7m004385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - schematic editor for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177108 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 06:59 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204598 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 10:59:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301059.k7UAxXJZ004404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 06:59 EST ------- *** Bug 177108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:00:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301100.k7UB0Dao004463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-08-30 07:00 EST ------- Chitlesh, Have the libgd issues been fixed now, I'm kinda lost after the discussion above. If its not fixed and you want help can you explain what is the problem exactly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:00:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301100.k7UB0NjJ004489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301100.k7UB0bK7004520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204598 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:04:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301104.k7UB4Yu4004846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 07:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Chitlesh, > > Have the libgd issues been fixed now, I'm kinda lost after the discussion above. It has already been fixed :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:08:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301108.k7UB8Dtr005073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 07:08 EST ------- Mamoru: once you've installed geda-gschem, surely you will have to install geda-symbols first, gschem & Add > component (you will see the symbols ) Then you might want an example, open any .sch from /usr/share/gEDA/examples/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:09:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200918] Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301109.k7UB9pA4005167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200918 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-08-30 07:09 EST ------- A small update: Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgadmin3/pgadmin3-admin81.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgadmin3/pgadmin3-admin81-1.4.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:12:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200918] Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301112.k7UBCHRH005341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200918 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:13:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] New: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: This package contains circuit examples for the gEDA project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:14:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301114.k7UBEqwf005613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:15:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301115.k7UBFELR005668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204601 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:38:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177416] Review Request: geda-examples - some examples for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301138.k7UBciKW007202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - some examples for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177416 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 07:38 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204601 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:39:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301139.k7UBd7Op007226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 07:39 EST ------- *** Bug 177416 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:56:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] New: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gsymcheck.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gsymcheck-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: Gsymcheck is a utility to check symbols for gschem. It is part of the gEDA project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:58:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177110] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - symbol checker for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301158.k7UBw9rN008410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - symbol checker for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177110 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 07:57 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204605 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 11:58:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301158.k7UBwVge008434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 07:58 EST ------- *** Bug 177110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 12:01:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301201.k7UC11pL008568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 08:00 EST ------- Example: gsymcheck /usr/share/gEDA/sym/diode/led-3.sym -vv gEDA/gsymcheck version 20060123 gEDA/symcheck comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more details. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; please see the COPYING file for more details. Checking: /usr/share/gEDA/sym/diode/led-3.sym Warning: Missing footprint= attribute 1 warnings found No errors found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 12:22:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301222.k7UCMtId009810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 08:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > This package (kita-0.177.3-6) havs been APPROUVED ! Thank you!! Well, unset QTLIB was my misunderstanging, it should be unset QTDIR. Finally * 0.177.3-8 is pushed * rebuild for devel succeeded. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=15477 * SyncNeeded is requested for FE-5. I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thanks for reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 12:34:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301234.k7UCYpx1010457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-08-30 08:34 EST ------- Ok, maybe we should tackel a FC-5 version of this package first for review ? I can't reproduce those rpmlint warnings, but I build the package with mock under FC-4. Running rpmlint on rawhide on those packages yields warnings about weakly linked symbols which I'm not sure quite sure yet what to do about... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 12:46:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301246.k7UCkuhG011056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 12:47:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301247.k7UClMld011099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204605 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 13:51:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301351.k7UDp1Ce014873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-30 09:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Shouldn't the JNI library be in %{_libdir}/java/, or > %{_libdir}/java-ext/? What makes you think that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 14:17:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301417.k7UEHT11016593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 10:17 EST ------- #26 - fair enough. Once the other aspects are fixed and new srpm is uploaded (complete with any sub-package tarballs), I'll review it and hopefully, it'll pass and the world will carry one, but with a lot of people on the OLPC enjoying the benefits :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 14:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301420.k7UEKSmu016901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 10:20 EST ------- Review for libgeda-20060123-5: Almost okay. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires - Why does libgeda main package require texi2html ? = Requires for -devel package is now CORRECT . * BuildRequires - libXpm-devel libjpeg-devel libpng-devel <- all required by gd-devel - fontconfig-devel <- required by pango-devel <- required by gtk2-devel * File and Directory Ownership - Umm, I don't think that -doc package has to have /usr/share/doc/libgeda-doc-20060123/docs directory. All files in the directory can be moved to /usr/share/doc/libgeda-doc-20060123/ . Perhaps you want to write in -doc file entry %doc docs/* , not %docs/ 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. The other things I have noticed: = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 14:36:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301436.k7UEaiV1018280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204624 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 14:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301453.k7UErJ2o019444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-30 10:53 EST ------- Doesn't build, needs a BuildRequires: libtool to get past autoreconf. When it does build, I get: E: mono-debugger shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/libmonodebuggerreadline.so.0.0.0 Not sure why, the build log indicates compiling with -fPIC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 14:56:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301456.k7UEuv5G019675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-30 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #27) > > Shouldn't the JNI library be in %{_libdir}/java/, or > > %{_libdir}/java-ext/? > > What makes you think that? It is a wild guess that dlopened files are searched for by the JVM in these directories, but I may be wrong, since I don't know java packaging at all... Isn't there a directory more suitable that %_libdir? perl and python don't drop the similar object files in %_libdir, I guessed it was the same with java, but I may be missing something... (as a side note I couldn't rebuild csound, I would have liked to investigate more, but rpmbuild -ba stops at the very beginning with: Checking for C header file stdio.h... no *** Failed to compile a simple test program. The compiler is *** possibly not set up correctly, or is used with invalid flags. *** Check config.log to find out more about the error. trying the gcc command line that appears in config.log by hand, there is no error??? I am on up to date rawhide.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 15:07:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301507.k7UF73Js020269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 11:07 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libgeda.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libgeda-20060123-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 15:26:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301526.k7UFQaZj021911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-30 11:26 EST ------- FYI, I'd like to make an announcement soon regarding openmotif's departure, so please make the temporary adjustment here to lesstif to make it parallel installable with openmotif(as-is), so, per comment #19, > An alternative would be to rename one of the > xmbind program (likely for the init script and the man page) to > lesstif-xmbind or openmotif-xmbind. I'd say use xmbind.lesstif and go with that (and then I'll FE-APPROVE this) If/when openmotif goes away, the file renames can be reverted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 15:30:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301530.k7UFUZbl022336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 11:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135219) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135219&action=view) ngspice spec file corrected for compilation flags (In reply to comment #9) > Created an attachment (id=135186) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135186&action=view) [edit] > Mock build log of ngspice-17-3 > > Okay. 3rd review. > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > > = rpmlint became silent. > > * Compiler flags > - I checked this again, however, it is not yet okay. > My mock build log says: > > + /usr/bin/make > /usr/bin/make all-recursive > make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/ng-spice-rework-17' > Making all in xgraph > make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph' > /usr/bin/make all-am > make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph' > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -MT xgraph.o -MD -MP -MF > ".deps/xgraph.Tpo" -c -o xgraph.o xgraph.c; \ > then mv -f ".deps/xgraph.Tpo" ".deps/xgraph.Po"; else rm -f > ".deps/xgraph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -MT xgX.o -MD -MP -MF > ".deps/xgX.Tpo" -c -o xgX.o xgX.c; \ > then mv -f ".deps/xgX.Tpo" ".deps/xgX.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/xgX.Tpo"; > exit 1; fi > ....... > > So the compilation in ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph do not accept > Fedora specific compilation flags. > Check and change Makefile(.in) in ng-spice-rework-17/xgraph so that > sources are correctly compiled with Fedora specific compilation > flags. > Try the spec file attached and add some fix you think it is needed. If you upload new spec file, then I will check it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 15:55:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301555.k7UFtW3H024534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 11:55 EST ------- Okay!! Now I am pleased to say that this package (libgeda) is APPROVED . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:08:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301608.k7UG8d6G025655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-30 12:08 EST ------- I changed my mind and put uil and xmbind in a lesstif-clients package, like upstream. That way it will be easier to have a -devel package parallel installable for different arches. - split out a clients package that contains xmbind and uil Should appear soon on http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif-0.95.0-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:09:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301609.k7UG9r6V025761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-30 12:09 EST ------- + Follows naming conventions + proper %clean section + proper permissions + macro usage APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:15:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301615.k7UGFOhj026279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 12:15 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice-17-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:18:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301618.k7UGId6Q026656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 Bug 191350 depends on bug 191387, which changed state. Bug 191387 Summary: RFE: support for perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191387 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301620.k7UGKIKx026732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-30 12:20 EST ------- excellent, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:36:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301636.k7UGaFCx028034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-30 12:36 EST ------- I have posted a new version: - add a patch such that motif-config honors libdir http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/lesstif-0.95.0-7.src.rpm Should I import that version in cvs as usual, even though it conflicts with openmotif? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:36:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301636.k7UGaHjj028057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-30 12:36 EST ------- Seems you have combined the list of files and dirs into INSTALLED_OBJECTS but the files section is %files -f INSTALLED_FILES. Thus cobbler does not own its dir in site-packages. Good: + License: GPL + noarch python package + macro use + %clean section + file permissions + rpmlint clean + follows packaging guidelines APPROVED Just fix the %files before building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:38:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301638.k7UGcDhF028260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-08-30 12:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Is it a bug of gstreamer or perl-GStreamer? To me, it sounds like a bug in gstreamer, if it works here but not on devel. It looks as if it centers on not parsing the file:/... uri correctly from what you're saying.... For reference, these are my installed gstreamer packages: gstreamer-0.10.4-1.x86_64.rpm gstreamer-devel-0.10.4-1.x86_64.rpm gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.5-1.x86_64.rpm gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.2-1.x86_64.rpm gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.2-1.lvn5.x86_64.rpm gstreamer-tools-0.10.4-1.x86_64.rpm gstreamer08-0.8.12-5.fc5.x86_64.rpm gstreamer08-plugins-0.8.12-5.fc5.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301643.k7UGhq9F028519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-30 12:43 EST ------- Sorry, I'm not interested in reviewing this further at the moment. Reassigning, back to FE-NEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:55:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301655.k7UGt3mS029111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 12:54 EST ------- First review for libstroke: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Licensing + This package says it is distributed under GPL, however, this does not include the copy of GPL license. I won't block this package by this issue, however, it is recommended that you ask for upstream to include GPL documents to this package. * Requires - %package -n libgstroke-devel Conflicts: libstroke-devel What does this mean? Is there any way to remove this conflict sentence? * BuildRequirs - texinfo Is this really required? It seems that makeinfo is not used in rebuilding. - libX11-devel <- required by gtk+-devel * File and Directory Ownership %{_datadir}/libstroke %{_datadir}/libstroke/java %{_datadir}/libstroke/test --- not owned by any packages. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:56:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301656.k7UGu58A029167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-08-30 12:56 EST ------- Cobbler ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ) was just approved (thanks jpmahowald) here, so this submission is no longer blocked waiting on cobbler approval. Seeing this programs are paired (client & server RPM's, essentially) it would be great if I could submit them both to FC-E at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 16:58:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301658.k7UGwuIu029276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-30 12:58 EST ------- > Should I import that version in cvs as usual, even though it > conflicts with openmotif I thought we cleared up all the conflicting bits (in the main/core pkgs anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:01:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301701.k7UH1WUw029410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-30 13:01 EST ------- Sorry, but I don't intend to do a full review now. Reassigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:06:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301706.k7UH6hhN029741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 13:06 EST ------- Okay: This time this package (ngspice) is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:07:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173724] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301707.k7UH7HE0029836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173724 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-30 13:07 EST ------- Closing as per stalled review guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:13:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301713.k7UHDnpp030236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 13:13 EST ------- P.S. Not specified to this package: Just to mention: * Please remember to close review bugs when necessary process is finished. * For xcircuit and kpolynome : It seems that needs.rebuild files are in FC-6 branch. Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/FC6MassRebuild and remove this file by a proper way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:21:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301721.k7UHL7dB030772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:32:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301732.k7UHWCp1031281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 13:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > First review for libstroke: > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Licensing > + This package says it is distributed under GPL, however, > this does not include the copy of GPL license. > I won't block this package by this issue, however, it is > recommended that you ask for upstream to include GPL > documents to this package. > I've contacted upstream. > * Requires > - %package -n libgstroke-devel > Conflicts: libstroke-devel > > What does this mean? Is there any way to remove this > conflict sentence? > I don't see how. Updatedb: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:42:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199173] Review Request: clusterssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301742.k7UHgaCm031999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clusterssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199173 duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 17:49:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301749.k7UHnv5t032649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-30 13:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok, maybe we should tackel a FC-5 version of this package first for review ? I > can't reproduce those rpmlint warnings, but I build the package with mock under > FC-4. Running rpmlint on rawhide on those packages yields warnings about weakly > linked symbols which I'm not sure quite sure yet what to do about... Usually it means you need to link the binary/library against the library that the weakly-linked symbols come from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:13:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301813.k7UIDx3L002147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 dcbw at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134940|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-30 14:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135230) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135230&action=view) specfile v6 Latest specfile; changes in changelog entry at bottom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:15:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301815.k7UIFOEm002390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-30 14:15 EST ------- All the latest files are also at: http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/csound/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:26:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301826.k7UIQiX4003932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 14:26 EST ------- Well: * I just want to know why libgstroke-devel conflicts with libstroke-devel . * %{_datadir}/stroke/ (in main package) Well, no. When writing as this, this (main) package includes the directory %{_datadir}/stroke/ and all files under this directory. If you want to include only the directory, explicit declaration of %dir is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:37:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301837.k7UIbBns005441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 14:37 EST ------- Well: as I said in the comment #2 : * pkgconfig for BR is not needed. * Explain what is geda in this package as this seems to be the central package for geda. * Also, by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets , the requirement of gtk-update-icon-cache update-desktop-database for Requires(post,postun) should be removed and || : method should be used in %post and %postun. Re-upload spec and srpm files. Then I will check it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:49:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301849.k7UInDix006768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 14:49 EST ------- There are suprisingly not much difference, only libgstroke-devel is the gnome bindings of libstroke-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301851.k7UIpO2m007090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2006-08-30 14:51 EST ------- The versioning has been updated in order to separate the upstreamn from the RPM release. Since this represents a major change to the versioning, I went ahead and pushed to upstream release number 1.0 The following are available at http://people.redhat.com/sconklin sos-1.0-1.noarch.rpm sos-1.0-1.src.rpm sos.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301853.k7UIrgvA007364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 14:53 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:56:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301856.k7UIuosT007726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 14:56 EST ------- I'll leave this package the last to update since there are more work to be done on its requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 18:58:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301858.k7UIwxaa007936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From willey at etla.net 2006-08-30 14:58 EST ------- I'm not sure why there is a conflict -- is that some artifact of your packaging system? (Which I'm not familiar with.) I'll put COPYING in the next release. I haven't made a release for a long time, but I'll do so to resolve that and the conflict issue, if we can figure out exactly what's broken there and if there's something for me to fix on my release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:01:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301901.k7UJ1WJ0008296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 15:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > There are suprisingly not much difference, only libgstroke-devel is the gnome > bindings of libstroke-devel. Umm.. I still cannot understand why these conflicts each other. ( as Mark says ) * File lists do not make duplicate. * When using libstroke-devel, it requires to write "include " in source code and to use -lstroke. On the other hand when using libgstroke-devel they changes to "include " and -lgstroke . They never overwrite each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:16:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301916.k7UJGVsl009721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-30 15:16 EST ------- Built, added in owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:21:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301921.k7UJLeSF010073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-08-30 15:21 EST ------- There are a few more things that this package needs before it should be committed: - One of the headers needs to be fixed, or xpdf/ddd won't compile - There are some obvious x86_64 cleanups that can be made - We need to patch for CAN-2005-0605 - nuke host.def, imake owns that - resolve rpmlint error from rpm-braindead behavior on handling symlinks with debuginfo I took your package and fixed all of those items: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/MOTIF/lesstif-0.95.0-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:26:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301926.k7UJQqYU010477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 15:26 EST ------- Ok, the "conflict" in the spec was written by the previous packager. I thought it was founded enough. Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:32:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301932.k7UJW8cR011087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:32:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301932.k7UJWUsJ011136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 Bug 204598 depends on bug 204168, which changed state. Bug 204168 Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:32:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301932.k7UJWiMa011177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 15:32 EST ------- Well: As was in main package %files -n %{name}-devel %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/ %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/stroke_test %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/stroke_test.tcl %files -n javastroke %{_datadir}/stroke/java/ %{_datadir}/stroke/java/*.java These are duplicates. Please check file entries so that * all necessary files and directories are owned. * duplicate files are not listed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:33:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301933.k7UJXEHF011270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 Bug 204605 depends on bug 204168, which changed state. Bug 204168 Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:33:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301933.k7UJXLCU011290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:38:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301938.k7UJcfLA011996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 15:38 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 19:53:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608301953.k7UJriuL013330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-08-30 15:53 EST ------- OK, here's a new libGLw package for consideration that resolves all the items in comment 13 except the renaming (naming is up to the maintainer): http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/MOTIF/libGLw-1.0-3.src.rpm I also made some very minor spec file changes to fix this package for x86_64 and make the proper lib symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 20:03:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608302003.k7UK3HSV014306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 16:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Updated: > Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec > SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-10.src.rpm Well, not yet okay. rpm -qlp *0.5.1*rpm | sort says /usr/share/stroke/tests /usr/share/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test /usr/share/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test /usr/share/stroke/tests/stroke_test /usr/share/stroke/tests/stroke_test.tcl /usr/src/debug/libstroke-0.5.1 ... /usr/share/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test is owned by libstroke-devel and libgstroke-devel and... from this package: there is a case that only libgstroke and libgstroke-devel and libstroke are installed: in that case the directory %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/ is not owned by any packages. This is not correct. So: %files -n %{name} %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README COPYRIGHT ChangeLog NEWS AUTHORS TODO CREDITS %dir %{_datadir}/stroke/ %dir %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/ %{_libdir}/libstroke.so.* %files -n %{name}-devel %defattr(-,root,root) %doc doc/standard_strokes* %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/stroke_test* %{_datadir}/aclocal/libstroke.m4 %{_libdir}/libstroke.so %{_includedir}/stroke.h %files -n libgstroke %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README COPYRIGHT ChangeLog NEWS AUTHORS TODO CREDITS %{_libdir}/libgstroke.so.* %files -n libgstroke-devel %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README.libgstroke %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test %{_datadir}/aclocal/libgstroke.m4 %{_libdir}/libgstroke.so %{_includedir}/gstroke.h %files -n javastroke %defattr(-,root,root) %doc javastroke/README %{_datadir}/stroke/java/ is correct (I think. check it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 21:09:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] New: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/zvbi.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/zvbi-0.2.22-1.src.rpm Description: ZVBI provides functions to capture and decode VBI data. The vertical blanking interval (VBI) is an interval in a television signal that temporarily suspends transmission of the signal for the electron gun to move back up to the first line of the television screen to trace the next screen field. The vertical blanking interval can be used to carry data, since anything sent during the VBI would naturally not be displayed; various test signals, closed captioning, and other digital data can be sent during this time period. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 21:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608302118.k7ULIESo021542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-30 17:18 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-4.4.0-2.src.rpm And success! It builds in fc6 mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 21:22:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608302122.k7ULMLZS021688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204694 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-08-30 17:22 EST ------- Updated version with support for zvbi http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kdetv.spec http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kdetv-0.8.9-2.src.rpm Note: zvbi is also waiting for review :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 21:22:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608302122.k7ULMW8t021723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204421 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 21:24:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608302124.k7ULOqRg021895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-30 17:24 EST ------- Included and rebuilt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 21:44:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204700] New: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: triad at df.lth.se QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/njb-sharp-0.3.0-1.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/njb-sharp.spec Description: njb-sharp provides C# bindings to libnjb, which is interesting for the music player Banshee for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 22:49:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608302249.k7UMnBLX025943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 18:49 EST ------- Okay, as that was the only thing I objected to, I'm happy to approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 30 22:59:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608302259.k7UMxVv8026330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-08-30 18:59 EST ------- Don't set BuildArch. The build system builds on i386 not i686, so it won't build with mock. Not only that, but this breaks other architectures like x86_64 and ppc. If you must force it to build on certain arches only use ExclusiveArch. I don't think this will be necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 00:17:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310017.k7V0HmmA028604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #135088|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 20:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135251) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135251&action=view) Fixed spec file Fixes the libtool problem. I can't reproduce the fPIC problem (though I thought that problem was no longer a blocker or something like that) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 00:25:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310025.k7V0Pl0G028818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 20:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mod_mono.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mod_mono-1.1.17-1.src.rpm FINALLY! Compiles cleanly, rpmlint is more or less happy. The package is already architecture agnostic, though I had to mess in the spec so that the config when to http/conf.d instead of httpd/conf Plenty of fixes to the spec file as well -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 00:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310053.k7V0rjdd029725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 20:53 EST ------- #30 - I've only seen this once and that was when my system was seriously screwed up (mixed x86 and x86_64 rpms causing conflicts). Are you on a 64 bit box? If you are, get rid of the i386 versions and see if that's happier. #32 - Have you merged the two tarballs [source + manual] together? If so, you either need to document it or preferably have Source0 for the package and Source1 for the docs - I can't really verify md5sums if they're merged here and not upstream. You never did say if there were any translations for the package. Building the packages now... rpmlint comes up with the usual no-docs for a couple of packages and two warnings for the java package (symlink and so-name). I'll build it in mock and if all goes well, will do the full review on it tomorrow at some point. I do need the point above about if you have merged the tarballs together clarifying though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 01:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310114.k7V1Ewhg030500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 21:14 EST ------- Could we move on this as autogen is one of those very handy to have applications, so it's not just those using anjuta2 who will benefit from it's inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 01:29:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310129.k7V1TJw7031161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-30 21:29 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net-1.0.7-6.src.rpm 64 bit clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 01:56:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310156.k7V1uInd032267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-30 21:56 EST ------- Ok will wait for somebody to do that work. I am also too busy since 2 weeks and didn't got time to have any new updates here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 02:23:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310223.k7V2N4sH001232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-30 22:23 EST ------- ok, all the 5 issues above from comment #2 are fixed... one new thing however, you're missing a changelog entry for the -2 release. Fix that up and I think this will be all ready for approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 02:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310249.k7V2nbBC003294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-30 22:49 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: eabc78b67018efdfea68ae9b9d545e80 pyspf-1.7.tar.gz eabc78b67018efdfea68ae9b9d545e80 pyspf-1.7.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. There seems to be some confusion on the license on this package... You have 'Python License' in the spec, but the package lists 'Python Software Foundation License' in several places. Most confusingly, the spfquery.py file says it's released under the GPL: PKG-INFO:License: Python Software Foundation License PKG-INFO:Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Python Software Foundation License README:License: Python Software Foundation License setup.py: license='Python Software Foundation License', setup.py: 'License :: OSI Approved :: Python Software Foundation License', spfquery.py:# This code is under the GNU General Public License. See COPYING for details. 2. rpmlint has some output: W: python-pyspf summary-ended-with-dot Python module and programs for SPF (Sender Policy Framework). suggest: remove the . at the end of summary. W: python-pyspf incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.7-1 1.7-2.fc6 suggest: add changelog for -2 release. W: python-pyspf invalid-license Python License suggestion: see issue 1. E: python-pyspf non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spf.py 0644 spf.py has a #! for python, so it should either be 755 or (more likely) have the top line simply removed so it can be used as a python module instead of a script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 06:04:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310604.k7V64uNW012180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-31 02:04 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Kevin. I've got a corrected version at: Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf-1.7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 06:09:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310609.k7V69tjY012275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-31 02:09 EST ------- I've changed this to include a changelog for -3. I hope this is ok, as I pretty much consider everything <-3 to be part of the initial packaging, since I haven't released them otherwise. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns-2.3.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 07:28:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310728.k7V7SCJr015719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-31 03:28 EST ------- First review for geda-gsymcheck : 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * BuildRequires gtk2-devel guile-devel <- required by libgeda-devel libpng-devel <- required by gd-devel <- required by libgeda-devel * Encoding /usr/share/doc/geda-gsymcheck-20060123/AUTHORS is encoded in ISO-8859-1 and includes non-ascii character(s). Change the encoding to UTF-8 by iconv. * File and Directory Ownership The directory %{_datadir}/gEDA/ is already owned by geda-symbols-20060123-3.fc6 and this package requires geda-symbols (as written). 2. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = None. 3. Other things I have noticed: * URL Maybe http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gsymcheck/index.html is more proper? And would you check other gEDA related packages if more preferable URL can be found? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 08:21:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310821.k7V8L9hr019426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-31 04:21 EST ------- New version http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/xbae-4.60.4-3.src.rpm - rebuild against lesstif - add Obsolete/Provides for Xbae As a side note, I think that grace won't have to be modified otherwise than BuildRequiring xbae-devel instead of openmotif-devel once xbae is in, to switch to using lesstif. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 08:31:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203274] Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310831.k7V8VBvk020034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 Bug 203274 depends on bug 203993, which changed state. Bug 203993 Summary: change openmotif to be parallel installable with lesstif https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203993 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 08:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310843.k7V8hoNU020978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 08:57:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310857.k7V8vw9Z021837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-08-31 04:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135268) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135268&action=view) logfile from rpmbuild -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 08:58:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310858.k7V8wXq0021889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-08-31 04:58 EST ------- grant me some questions: why it is necessary to build these package as root? and why is the install method through rpm, instead of using pear? ok, the way by rpm is even ok and it is possibly better way to avoid obsolete files in the filesystem. but the build of that package is only possible as root. attached is a logfile of the buildprocess, unfortunatelly it did not build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 09:38:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310938.k7V9cab5025192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-31 05:38 EST ------- The only remaining warning is: libng/plugins/read-avi.c: In function 'avi_find_chunk': libng/plugins/read-avi.c:217: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'off_t' rpmlint complains: W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/flt-disor.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/conv-mjpeg.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/conv-audio.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/flt-gamma.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/read-avi.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/linedoubler.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/flt-invert.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/bilinear.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/linear-blend.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/drv0-v4l2.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/cubic.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/drv1-v4l.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/write-avi.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/snd-oss.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/drv0-v4l2-old.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/lib64/streamer/flt-smooth.so: File format not recognized W: streamer objdump-failed objdump: /tmp/streamer-1.1.4-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm.21567/usr/bin/streamer: File format not recognized I don't know why that's happening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 09:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310948.k7V9m0pc025988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From tobiasoed at hotmail.com 2006-08-31 05:47 EST ------- What is the motivation for switching from openmotif to lesstif? From my experience lesstif is more buggy than openmotif. Tobias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 09:48:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310948.k7V9mvve026222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-31 05:48 EST ------- TODO: use fedora-usermgmt for user creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 09:53:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608310953.k7V9rISp026571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-08-31 05:53 EST ------- You could have a look at Bug #202527, in short openmotif isn't OSI compatible, this conflicts with fedora goals. There are many threads on mailing lists also if you want further references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 10:24:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311024.k7VAOQng028436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-08-31 06:24 EST ------- Please, receive the output of following commands: pkgs=`rpm -qa | grep clam`; echo $pkgs; rpm -V $pkgs ldd /usr/bin/klamav P.S. On fresh updated fc6 the issue isn't reproduced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 11:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311120.k7VBKIB7031753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 07:20 EST ------- But on my i386 machine i didn't get any warning in compilation or error in rpmlint output. sorry i don't have x86_64 machine. How can i solve this problem now?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 11:41:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311141.k7VBfexa000858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 07:41 EST ------- packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + Desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball ab191878d0694c77c4e5dd1d22f3d14c qcomicbook-0.3.2.tar.gz + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 12:08:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204258] Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311208.k7VC80Dj002837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204258 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 08:07 EST ------- {Not a official review} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 but suggests *** Desktop database not updated. Remember to run: *** *** update-desktop-database /usr/share/applications *** More on that check at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef desktop-database section + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + Desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball f8c23b1de6d23927729c477689883c38 mousepad-0.2.6.tar.bz2 + No duplicate files + Desktop file handled correctly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:11:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311311.k7VDBjSA006498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 09:11 EST ------- {Not a official review} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 with warnings config.c: In function 'translate': config.c:27: warning: value computed is not used config.c:32: warning: value computed is not used config.c:37: warning: value computed is not used config.c:42: warning: value computed is not used config.c:47: warning: value computed is not used config.c:52: warning: value computed is not used config.c:57: warning: value computed is not used + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + Desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 650f6e42c1604a39601a48c3fffd814a foremost-1.2.tar.gz.1 + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:21:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311321.k7VDL8EP007008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | OtherBugsDependingO| |204598, 204605 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-31 09:20 EST ------- Well... A problem of owning the directory %{_datadir}/gEDA/bitmap between geda-symbols <-> geda-gsymcheck geda-symbols <-> geda-gschem . I reopen this bug to fix directory owning problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:21:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311321.k7VDLKm4007038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204263 Bug 204598 depends on bug 204263, which changed state. Bug 204263 Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:21:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311321.k7VDLvkA007112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |204263 Bug 204605 depends on bug 204263, which changed state. Bug 204263 Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311323.k7VDN6HS007264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311326.k7VDQb57007561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-08-31 09:26 EST ------- and now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:30:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311330.k7VDUB0a007707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 09:30 EST ------- wait for official package review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 13:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311336.k7VDaaUc008243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 09:36 EST ------- packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 - rpmlint on binary rpm is NOT silent W: digikam-doc summary-not-capitalized digiKam and Showfoto documentation Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. =>Make Summary start with capital letter E: digikam-doc no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. =>make package noarch type W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt_BR/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/es/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/es/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/showfoto/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: digikam-doc dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/digikam/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere => check link path where you want to link in SPEC file + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + Desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 5fea0b1d1aff7ce98954bbc3951d5fa9 digikam-doc-0.8.2-r1.tar.bz2 + No duplicate files why files from this package is not merged with digikam package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 14:11:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311411.k7VEB0jS011629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-08-31 10:10 EST ------- No, tarballs haven't been merged. They are separate Source lines in the specfile, since they are separate tarballs upstream. There appear to be no translations at this time, I'm still trying to get word from upstream about that though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 15:40:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311540.k7VFeSpk018893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 11:39 EST ------- I can review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 15:48:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311548.k7VFmEJ7019531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-31 11:48 EST ------- First review of geda-gschem : 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Naming - Maybe http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gschem/index.html is more suitable for URL . * Use rpmlint - E: geda-gschem devel-dependency libgeda-devel E: geda-gschem explicit-lib-dependency libgeda-devel E: geda-gschem explicit-lib-dependency libstroke-devel Please explain why this package (geda-gschem) should depend on libstroke-devel and libgeda-devel. * BuildRequires: - gtk2-devel, guile-devel, gd-devel <- required by libgeda-devel - gettext-devel ... is this really required? - mesa-libGL-devel ... also, is this really required? .... by my mock build, gettext-devel and mesa-libGL-devel seems unnecessary. * Encoding - /usr/share/doc/geda-gschem-20060123/AUTHORS is encoded in ISO-8859-1 and includes non-ascii character(s). Change the encoding to UTF-8. * Desktop files - Well, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets , update-desktop-database seems to be needed when desktop file includes mimetype key. * Using %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Mixed use is found. Please unify the usage. * Timestamps - Well, this package have many text files and xpm files so keeping timestamps is desirable. Again, try to keep timestamps (does this package accept 'make INSTALL="install -p" install' ?) * File and Directory Ownership Umm... this is somewhat complicated..... Please recheck the owning issue of directories. - the directory %{_datadir}/gEDA/bitmap is owned by both geda-gsymcheck and geda-gschem. - geda-gsymcheck has only the directory and does not have any files under the directory. So the entry %dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/bitmap can be removed from geda-gsymcheck. - Or, if the trick written above is not desirable, the owner of %dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/bitma should be geda-symbols as both geda-gsymcheck and geda-gschem requires geda-symbols. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:06:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200976] Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311606.k7VG6BHf020780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyphesis - WorldForge game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200976 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-08-31 12:06 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:17:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311617.k7VGHqXF021456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |dwmw2 at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-08-31 12:17 EST ------- Assigning to myself. It'll be a week or two before I'm home and able to look at it though -- so if anyone else wants to steal it from me and approve it in that time, feel free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311622.k7VGMHJf021915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-08-31 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > =>Make Summary start with capital letter digiKam is the proper name of the project, with capital letter it's invalid. > =>make package noarch type Adding 'BuildArch: noarch' cause this error: checking build system type... x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type... Invalid configuration `noarch-redhat-linux-gnu': machine `noarch-redhat' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh admin/config.sub noarch-redhat-linux-gnu failed > => check link path where you want to link in SPEC file Links point to ../common directory which is provided by i.e by kdelibs (required by digikam package, digikam package is needed by digikam-doc) > + License used is GPL License is GFDL > why files from this package is not merged with digikam package? This is how it's made in upstream, why? Probably because it's 40MB of docs against 4.2M of apps, so rebuilding digikam package (with docs included) cause almost 36MB bandwidth wasting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:33:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311633.k7VGXu1o022887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-31 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > =>Make Summary start with capital letter > > digiKam is the proper name of the project, with capital letter it's invalid. Perhaps a compromise would be to change the summary to: Documentation for digiKam and Showfoto > > =>make package noarch type > > Adding 'BuildArch: noarch' cause this error: > checking build system type... x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu > checking host system type... x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu > checking target system type... Invalid configuration `noarch-redhat-linux-gnu': > machine `noarch-redhat' not recognized > configure: error: /bin/sh admin/config.sub noarch-redhat-linux-gnu failed This is probably due to someone copy-and-pasting configure.ac bits between projects. What happens if you have a noarch package and you use: %configure --target=sparc64 Does that fix the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:42:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311642.k7VGgOkL023420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2006-08-31 12:42 EST ------- Adressing the issues raised in comment #3: 1. Will do so. 2. As per your wish, I have changed the groups for both the source package and the -console subpackage (which is completely unrelated to X11) from "Application/Text" to "User Interface/X". The -x11 subpackage has always been "User Interface/X", so that has not changed. 3. Removed perl and awk dependencies. 4. mkfontdir (called by %post) creates these files. As they are in a directory owned by this package, I want "rpm -e" to completely remove the directory including any content the package may have placed there. However, comment #4 seems to suggest the proper way to do that, which I did not know about probably due to the lack of documentation. WRT comment #4: Thanks a lot, this looks to be exactly what needs to be done here. I have just uploaded 4.20-5 with these changes incorporated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:47:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311647.k7VGlfSZ023838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-31 12:47 EST ------- failed to build in mock RPM builde errors: File not found: %{buildroot}/%{name}-%{version}.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/gcj/csound I'm also concerned with the file attached to the next entry when building the manual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:52:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311652.k7VGqNk3024112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-31 12:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135307) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135307&action=view) mock build log This log is repeated for most of the chapters with some having more errors than others, but in general, they follow the format here. It shouldn't constitute a problem, but it may make the manual look a bit odd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:55:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311655.k7VGt2RN024323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-08-31 12:54 EST ------- I removed the buildarch and created a new release. SRPM: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook-0.3.2-5.src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:56:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311656.k7VGuneQ024455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-31 12:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > failed to build in mock > > RPM builde errors: > > File not found: > %{buildroot}/%{name}-%{version}.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/gcj/csound You need to update your java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-devel to the -104 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 16:57:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311657.k7VGviqg024564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-08-31 12:57 EST ------- I think this is pretty close: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey/sqlgrey.spec http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey-1.7.4-2.src.rpm There's the pesky little detail that it doesn't seem to actually *work*, but the package seems clean to me. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 17:01:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311701.k7VH1VMS024781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-08-31 13:01 EST ------- Should we be using sqlite2 instead of 'sqlite' which is sqlite v3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 17:20:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311720.k7VHKevq026276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-31 13:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > This log is repeated for most of the chapters with some having more errors than > others, but in general, they follow the format here. > > It shouldn't constitute a problem, but it may make the manual look a bit odd The manual build process requires that we build it multiple times. Forward references are only resolved in the last build. The errors your pointing out happen prior to the final build, so they are ignoreable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 19:00:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204258] Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311900.k7VJ0S2Q003002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204258 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 15:00 EST ------- Thanks Parag. Updated to add 'update-desktop-database': Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/mousepad/mousepad.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/mousepad/mousepad-0.2.6- 2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 19:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] New: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/fedora/SPECS/wxMaxima.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/fedora/all/SRPMS.stable/wxMaxima-0.7.0-1.src.rpm Description: wxMaxima is a wxWidgets interface for the computer algebra system Maxima. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 19:36:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311936.k7VJa2kA005626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-08-31 15:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Perhaps a compromise would be to change the summary to: > > Documentation for digiKam and Showfoto Oh, you are right :) thanks. > > checking target system type... Invalid configuration `noarch-redhat-linux-gnu': > > machine `noarch-redhat' not recognized > > configure: error: /bin/sh admin/config.sub noarch-redhat-linux-gnu failed > > This is probably due to someone copy-and-pasting configure.ac bits between > projects. What happens if you have a noarch package and you use: > > %configure --target=sparc64 > > Does that fix the problem? "checking target system type... sparc64-unknown-none" and building goes fine, above error is caused by %configure macro which set "--target=noarch-redhat-linux-gnu". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 19:42:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311942.k7VJgjmg006152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-31 15:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > > checking target system type... Invalid configuration `noarch-redhat-linux-gnu': > > > machine `noarch-redhat' not recognized > > > configure: error: /bin/sh admin/config.sub noarch-redhat-linux-gnu failed > > > > This is probably due to someone copy-and-pasting configure.ac bits between > > projects. What happens if you have a noarch package and you use: > > > > %configure --target=sparc64 > > > > Does that fix the problem? > > "checking target system type... sparc64-unknown-none" and building goes fine, > above error is caused by %configure macro which set > "--target=noarch-redhat-linux-gnu". This isn't normally a problem unless there is for some reason AC_CANONICAL_* in the configure.ac, so that the configure script can make platform-specific decisions. Is that the case here, and if so, what is platform-dependent? I'd have thought nothing was platform dependent for a documentation package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 19:59:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608311959.k7VJxmeF007342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-08-31 15:59 EST ------- There isn't anything platform-dependent in documentation package, I've just tried to fix this in clean way, becuse IMHO "--target=" is more like a workaround. Anyway thanks for help, I've added "--target=x86" :) Spec URL: http://dakar.lunixsys.com/~mgarski/digikam-doc.spec SRPM URL: http://dakar.lunixsys.com/~mgarski/digikam-doc-0.8.2-2.src.rpm - Changed summary field - Build as noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:10:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312010.k7VKA2aE008002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-08-31 16:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > There isn't anything platform-dependent in documentation package, I've just > tried to fix this in clean way, becuse IMHO "--target=" is more like a > workaround. Anyway thanks for help, I've added "--target=x86" :) This is still a workaround; "--target=x86" certainly isn't true for a ppc build for instance. The proper fix would be to patch out the configure check for the platform. I'm not saying that you need to do that though, since the workaround gets the package building as noarch successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:10:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312010.k7VKAsAV008101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 16:10 EST ------- 1. MUST: --target=x86 will break on the buildsystem, as will may try to build .noarch on a ppc builder. (I'll attach a patch soon for that) 2. marking files under %_docdir as %doc is redundant (everything under %_docdir is already implicitly %doc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312012.k7VKCYKK008231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 16:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135326) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135326&action=view) fix for noarch build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:14:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312014.k7VKEEQJ008437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 16:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135327) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135327&action=view) specfile patch for items in comment #9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:18:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204258] Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312018.k7VKIAv6008862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-08-31 16:17 EST ------- I'd like to review this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:22:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312022.k7VKML93009132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 16:22 EST ------- Alternatively, or could avoid the need for patch + automake by changing --target=x86 to --target=%{_build_cpu} Not sure which, patching, or using --target is better (less hackish) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:23:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312023.k7VKNdkq009237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 16:23 EST ------- If it wasn't clear from comment #12, I'll leave it up to you to decide which approach you'd rather take in maintaining this (as a noarch build). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:48:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312048.k7VKmWXi011180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-08-31 16:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dakar.lunixsys.com/~mgarski/digikam-doc.spec SRPM URL: http://dakar.lunixsys.com/~mgarski/digikam-doc-0.8.2-3.src.rpm - Remove redundant %doc - Fix noarch building I have used --target=%{_build_cpu}, and will report this issue upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 20:52:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312052.k7VKqJXj011493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 16:52 EST ------- Looks good, thanks, APPROVED. BTW, you interested in doing digikamimageplugins-doc too? (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 21:21:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204852] New: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/tuxpaint-stamps/tuxpaint-stamps.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25-1.src.rpm Description: This package is a collection of 'rubber stamps' for Tux Paint's "Stamp" tool. (Thanks to Wart for doing all the work for me.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 21:25:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312125.k7VLPv3J013707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-08-31 17:25 EST ------- Thanks for approving. I will import package when CVS will be up (recently it had many downtimes). I will consider making digikamimageplugins-doc, but IMHO you as a digikamimageplugins maintainer could keep base and doc package in better sync :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 21:31:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312131.k7VLVUbm014005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-31 17:31 EST ------- This version has changelog entries for the -2 Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pydns-2.3.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 21:33:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312133.k7VLXTLO014091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-31 17:33 EST ------- This version has a changelog for the -2 release as well. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf-1.7-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 22:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312201.k7VM1DIH015749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-31 18:01 EST ------- According to an e-mail from the author, the license for spfquery will be changed to the Python license: From: "Stuart D. Gathman" Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:05:12 -0400 (EDT) To: Sean Reifschneider On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Sean Reifschneider wrote: > In pyspf 1.7, spfquery.py says it's GPLed, but the PKG-INFO file says it's > under the Python Software Foundation License. Spfquery is by me. It was originally for pymilter - which is GPL due to the original author. I will change it to Python license. I would like to change pymilter as well, with the original authors permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 22:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312224.k7VMOETY017266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-31 18:24 EST ------- If this package has been included, could you please close this bug and mark it as NEXTRELEASE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 22:38:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312238.k7VMc1sD018187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-31 18:38 EST ------- Right, it's happy in mock (i386) and I'm not overly concerned about the manual. Review time: Good : Consistent use of macros throughout the spec file Clear US-English builds cleanly in mock main package md5 matches upstream (cvs cannot be checked) Main package has docs, others report no docs (not worried) No problems with file permissions No dupes in the rpms Licences fine Doesn't have any locale stuff or desktop icon Compiles fine (x86) No ownership problems Needs work CVS archive doesn't match the guidelines (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease). It should reflect the date on which it was grabbed (so it really should be csound-manual-CVS20060816-disttag The files section can be globbed %{_bindir}/c* grabs all starting with c (etc) makes the spec file a lot simpler to read (IMO) Fix the CVS datestamp for the manual and I'm happy to let this one go in. I'd be happy if the file globbing in the spec file was done, but it's not a blocker if you don't -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 23:08:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312308.k7VN8AiC019549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-08-31 19:07 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 23:21:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312321.k7VNLnA1020098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-31 19:21 EST ------- And completely fails to build here. Dies when it gets to compiling the java stuff ERRORS uipp/java/./dx/net/WELApplication.java import netscape.javascript.JSObject; (netscape doesn't exist) import vrml.external.Node; (vrml doesn't exist) extends DXLinkApplication implements vrml... (vrml can't be resolved to type) private EventOutSFTime touchTimeEO; (EventOutSFTime can't resolved to type) private EventOutSFVec3f vps_tp = null; (as above for EventOutSFVec3f) private JSObject window; (JSObject can't be resolved to type) There plenty of these. Is the spec missing a BR or two? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 31 23:45:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200608312345.k7VNjKRN021165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-08-31 19:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > Needs work > CVS archive doesn't match the guidelines (see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease). It > should reflect the date on which it was grabbed (so it really should be > csound-manual-CVS20060816-disttag This applies to pre-release snapshots, but not in this case. In this case we pulled the sources out using the release tag upstream used in their cvs repository, as descripted in the spec file. The only reason we had to pull it out of cvs is because they only made the resulting PDF/html available, not the original source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.