[Bug 201077] gfs-kmod

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: gfs-kmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077





------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com  2006-08-03 15:43 EST -------
In response to Comment #2
- Summary isn't capitalized because I was using the kernel module package
guidlines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules).  The line
they show is what I'm using:

Summary:        %{kmod_name} kernel modules

- Changelog has been added
- kmodtool needs to have that permission because it is script that is run from
the .spec file
- The .spec file does end in .spec, I'm not sure why this is an error.
- According to the kernel module specification, the name of the module should be
specified this way: (which it is)
     Name:           %{kmod_name}-kmod 

- This package will most likely never be in the mainstream kernel as it provides
support for GFS1 and we are only attempting to get GFS2 into the kernel.
- The userspace utilities are in gfs-utils, I'll get those in the proper format
according to the kernel module package guidlines.

In response to comment #3 & #4
- I've updated the kmodtool (from comment #5) this should work better now.
- Unfortunately utsrelease.h has the data that we need (#define UTS_RELEASE
"2.6.17-1.2462.fc6"), uts.h doesn't.

In response to comment #5
- I've put kmodtool back to the original, I had made modifications to get it to
work with an earlier version of the .spec file, and no longer needed those
modifications.

New SRPM/spec are here:
http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kmod-0.1.0-1.2.6.17_1.2505.fc6.src.rpm
http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kernel.spec






-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.