[Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Aug 6 12:51:42 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477


pertusus at free.fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2006-08-06 08:42 EST -------
A blocker:

- For t/pod99.t missing BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule)

4 remarks:
- no need to 
  mv LICENCE LICENSE
  it is the spec file that must be american english
- in the man page there is a reference to t/invalid and 
  t/sample_dates, so it may be relevant to package t/ in
  %doc
- I have the habit to add a trailing / to directories in %files
  for example notes could be notes/
- it may be relevant to contact the upstream about version
  strings, and try to convince him to have version strings in ascii
  ascending order (relevant for other DateTime modules)

Otherwise
* rpmlint warning, may be ignored
W: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail strange-permission filter-requires.sh 0755
* free software, licences included
* meets packaging guidelines
* spec legible
* match upstream
d3940d6b387b75de0332201db1685e7d  ./DateTime-Format-Mail-0.30.tar.gz
* sane provides:
Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Mail) = 0.30
* %files right

If you fix (or explain) the BuildRequires I'll approve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list