[Bug 201551] Review Request: db4o
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 8 07:17:18 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: db4o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551
------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-08 03:07 EST -------
E: db4o no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.
I'll change that.
E: db4o only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
Mono packages aren't sane when it comes to this and until mono is fixed, this
one can be ignored
* documentation takes up 75% of the installed size, -docs subpackage is necessary
Not a problem - I did that with XaraLX
i.e. mono(System) and mono(mscorlib) are provided by mono-core
* documentation takes up 75% of the installed size, -docs subpackage is necessary
It needs mono-core as a R and mono-devel as a BR.
* package doesn't meet packaging guidelines
- {_prefix}/%{_lib} vs. %{_libdir}, See
Permitted for the time being - have a look at the mono packaging guidelines
* Also, I don't like the use of sed where tr -d would suffice.
I'm not sure that's a blocker though
I'll fix the docs and noarch and upload a new spec file. Thanks for the review
up to now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list